Learn English With The Pursuit of Happyness Rachels English

You told me you want to study English with movies. 
And a lot of you suggested a Will Smith movie,  

“The Pursuit of Happyness”. By the way, 
the title of this film is intentionally  

misspelled. If you’re going to write this 
word, you definitely want to use an I. 

We’ll do a full pronunciation 
study of his job interview.  

So if you’re going to have a job interview in 
English anytime soon, this could be great for you.  

We’ll study reductions, linking, stress. 
All the things that make up the character  

of spoken American English. You’ll 
be surprised what you’ll learn. 

As always, if you like this 
video or you learn something new,  

please give it a thumbs up and subscribe and 
don’t forget to click that notification bell.

Let’s watch the clips we’ll study together.

Chris, what would you say if a guy walked 
in for an interview without a shirt on? 

And I hired him. What would you say?

He must’ve on some really nice pants.

(laughing)

Chris

You really pulled it off in there.
Thank you very much Mr. Twistle. 

Hey, now you can call me Jay.
Will talk to you soon.

And now the analysis.

Chris, 

Chris, He’s saying his name and that’s got a big 
up-down shape of stress. So that’s the shape of a  

stressed syllable in American English.
Chris 

We don’t have flat pitches for 
our stressed syllables. They  

have change in direction. Usually, it goes up 
and then down every once in a while it goes  

down and comes back up. But what’s important, 
it’s not flat. Chris, Chris, Chris. Chris.

Chris

And the CH letters there are making a K 
sound. CH in American English can be the  

SH sounds like in chef or Chicago, 
it can be K sounds like Chris  

or choir and of course it 
can be a CH sound like in choose

Chris

What would you say

What would you say. Then he puts a little break. 
So, when we have little breaks, that means the  

words aren’t linking together, there’s a little 
pause but aside from that break everything does  

link together and we call that a thought group. So 
he puts a break after Chris. He puts a break after  

say. So these four words linked together smoothly 
and we don’t want a feeling of choppiness.  

Words within a thought group should be very 
smooth and the melody should be smooth as well,  

no jumps or skips in the melody. So let’s 
listen to the melody of this phrase.

What would you say–

What would you say. What would you say. So would 
unstressed but what, some of that length and  

the up-down shape, you also has some of the 
up-down shape and then I think say actually  

goes the opposite way, starts going back up. So 
when we make the melody of our voice go up at  

the end of a phrase that means that we’re going to 
continue. It’s a signal that we have more to say.  

What, what would. What would. The T here is 
a stop T unreleased, it’s not T, what would,  

what would but what would, what would. 
It’s also not dropped. It’s not wha would,  

wha would. We have that little 
skip that little lift. What would.

What would–

The D sound in you also not released. 
It’s not would you but would you.  

Right from that vibration 
of the vocal cords of the D  

into the Y consonant. Now the letter L 
in would isn’t pronounced. What would.

What would

What would you say,

What would you say. Smoothly connected, no skips 
and if you’re practicing just those first two  

words what and would, make sure you’re feeling 
a difference there. What is stressed, would is  

unstressed, it shouldn’t feel the same. It’s 
not what, would but it’s what would, what would.

What would

What would you say if a guy walked in 
for an interview without a shirt on.

And now he finishes his thought group.

if a guy walked in for an 
interview without a shirt on.

Really this is a question isn’t it? He’s saying 
what, what would you say. His intonation does  

go down at the end. So sometimes people think 
for questions, intonation always goes up. But  

that’s now actually true. Definitely for yes no 
questions it’s true but questions that cannot be  

answered by yes or no usually the pitch goes 
down at the end which is what happens here.

if a guy walked in for an 
interview without a shirt on.

So let’s just look at this thought group 
again. We have a lot of words but no breaks.  

It’s not if a guy walked in. But it’s if a 
guy walked in. Ahhuauh. Smooth connection.

if a guy walked in

Let’s listen to it, see if you can identify. What 
are our longer syllables with a change in pitch?

if a guy walked in

If a guy walked in. if a guy walked, a little 
bit on guy but really the peak of stress there  

is walked. If and a, they’re just sort 
of part of the melody going up. If a,  

if a, if a, if a. It’s not if a but they’re said 
quickly, they’re unstressed. If a guy walked in.

if a guy walked in

Walked. This is another word with a silent L just like 
would. Now the ED ending in the word walked is  

pronounced as a T. And we have three different 
pronunciations for the ED ending. I do have a  

playlist on those ED endings so you can click 
here or see the link in the video description.

Walked in

Walked in, walked in.  

The T is just now released by itself. 
It’s released into the next word in.  

Walked in, walked in. So it’s not quite as strong, 
it’s subtle but this kind of linking is important.  

Because within thought groups we 
want to sounds to flow continuously.

Walked in

For an interview without a shirt on.

Walked in for an interview, an interview, 
more stress there without a shirt on.  

So walked in and stress, I’m sorry, and shirt are 
our most stressed syllables there. After walked,  

we have some unstressed syllables in, for, an 
and they’re not fully pronounced like that,  

are they? In for an, in for an, in 
for an, in for an, in for an. Can you  

understand that I’m saying those three words?
In for an. And they’re all linked together,  

the word for reduces. For, for. You can almost 
think of it as not having any vowel at all. It’s  

the schwa R sound. And the R links right into 
the schwa for our article an. For an for an,  

for an. In for an, in for an, in for an. 
Really unclear. And that’s what we want in  

our unstressed syllables. We have walked and 
interview. But in for an becomes in for an.  

in for an. in for an. We need that contrast of 
clear and less clear. Now you may have noticed  

in the word interview he dropped the T sound. 
That’s really common. T after N especially in the  

word part inter. Interview, internet, 
international. Really really common to drop the T.

Walked in for an interview without a shirt on

A little bit of stress on out. Without, 
without, without a, without (flap).  

What’s happening to that T? That becomes a flap T. 
I write that with the letter D. Because it sounds  

like the D between vowels in American English. 
But it’s coming between two vowel diphthong  

sounds. We have the OU diphthong in the 
word out. And we have the schwa and so a T  

between those two sounds is just (flap) going to 
flap against the tongue. Without a, without a.

Without a –

And there’s no break between interview 
and without either. Interview with, view  

with. Keep that sound going 
continuously, no choppiness.

Interview without a

Interview without a shirt on.

Without a shirt on. Now what’s happening with this 
T? Shirt on. (flap). It’s another flap T, why? It  

doesn’t come between two vowel of diphthong sounds 
because this is an R. Well the rules for flap T  

include after an R before a vowel or diphthong. 
So like in the word party, that’s a flap T,  

it comes after an R before a vowel or diphthong.
In the phrase shirt on. Shirt (flap) on.Flap T.

without a shirt on.

Let’s listen just to without a shirt on in slow 
motion so you can really focus in on those flaps,  

You’re not hearing ttt, that true T.

without a shirt on.

And I hired him.

Okay and he has one more thought group 
here. Everything links together. And I  

hired him. Everything is going up towards 
the peak of stress on our verb. And I,  

and I is just on the way to that peak of stress. 
And I hired him. One line, smoothly connected.

And I hired him.

We have a couple reductions. We have and,  

D is dropped. And I, and I. And that N consonant 
links right into the I diphthong. And I hired him.

And I hired him.

Hired him. Hired him. Can you tell that 
there’s no H there. He’s not saying hired him.  

He’s saying hired him. Dropping the H, it’s 
pretty common to drop the H in the word him,  

her, his, he. Definitely something 
that we do. And then we just link it  

on the word before. So here the ED ending 
makes a D sound. Hired him. Hired him.

Hired him.

What would you say? 

We have a four word thought group here. One word 
is the most stressed. Let’s listen to it three  

times. You tell me where your body wants to move, 
where do you feel the most stress is. If you were  

going to move your head once or move your hand 
once on the stress. Where would your body do that?

What would you say?

What would you say? Ahuhauh. I definitely 
hear that you is our one stress word,  

what and would lead up to it 
and then say falls away from it.

What would you say?

What. Stop T again not released. I should say 
with the Wh words, there is a pronunciation that  

has an escape of air before what, what, 
white, why. Have you ever noticed that?  

It’s not very common anymore and he doesn’t do 
that escape of air. It’s just a clean W sound.

What would—

What would, What would. Now we have a word 
ending in D, the next word is you, something  

interesting happening with the pronunciation. 
Listen three times and see if you can hear it.

What would you–

What would you, dyou, dyou, do you hear that? 
It’s a really clear J sound. Ju, ju. When a word  

ends in a D and the next word is you or your, 
it’s not uncommon to hear it turn it into a J,  

I think it sorts of helps smoothly link the 
two words together. We’d love smoothness in  

American English. What would you say? And then the 
voice falls down in pitch, everything connected.

What would you–

What would you say?

He must’ve had on some really nice pants.

He must’ve had on some. So in this thought 
group we have a first word stressed.  

He must’ve had on some. And then we have 
a bunch of words that are less stressed,  

flatter in pitch than our last three 
words stressed, longer. Really nice pants.

He must’ve had on some really nice pants.

Make sure everything is connected and 
smooth but also make sure you have rhythmic  

contrast. Speed up these words, make them less 
clear, we need that. He must’ve had on some.  

Do you notice must’ve. What’s happening there? 
The word have is being reduced all the way down  

to a single sound. The schwa, must’ve. Must’ve 
had on some. The D flaps as it links had and on.  

Must’ve had on some

He must’ve had on some–

And the word some. Not really fully pronounced. 
I would write that with a schwa instead of  

the UH as in butter sound. Some, some. He 
must’ve had on some. He must’ve had on some.

He must’ve had on some—

And then our last three words clearer, 
longer, up-down shape of stress.

Really nice pants.

Really nice pants. The word pants. The vowel 
there is a little tricky, it’s the AH vowel  

as in bat but when it’s followed by N like it is 
here, we make a sound in between. It’s like the UH  

as in butter vowel, back of the tongue relaxes. 
So it’s not ah, pa, pants. But it’s pae, [aeʌ] 

things relaxed and it changes the sound. 
Pae, pants. Pants, pants not pants.

Pants.

(laughing)

Chris..

Chris. Chris. Again, just like in the 
beginning we have a name a proper noun,  

stressed word, a single syllable so it 
has that up-down shape. Chris. Chris.

Chris.

You really pulled it off in there.

You really pulled it off in there. So we have 
a little bit of stress on really. You really  

pulled it. But most of on off in there. Most 
of it on off. Pull off. This is a phrasal verb.

You really pulled it off in there.

And it has a couple of different meanings. In 
this case it means to succeed at something,  

to achieve something. He had an interview  

and they loved him. He succeeded at 
that interview, he really pulled it off.

You really pulled it off in there.

The ed ending in pulled is just the D sound 
and that links right into the e vowel,  

for smoothness. Pulled it, pulled it. 
You really pulled it off. Now we have a T  

between vowels. Let’s listen for that.

It off–

It off, it off (flap). Yup, definitely a flap.  

You know we don’t have many rules in American 
English pronunciation that people follow but flap  

T, we follow that pretty well. Between two vowels 
or diphthong sounds or after an R before a vowel  

or diphthong sound we flap it. Pulled it off. 
It off, it off, it off. Pulled it off in there.

Pulled it off in there.

If it helps you to link more smoothly, think 
of the ending consonant as beginning the next  

word. So rather than thinking off in, you can 
think off-in. Off in, off in, off in there.

off in there.

Thank you very much Mr. Twistle.

So he stresses the word much and thank you, 
not very clear as in thank you very much Mr.  

Twistle. And then of course, stress on the name as 
well. But this is a nice way to show the contrast  

between the stress word much and the unstressed 
word thank you. So if all he had said was thank  

you, it probably would have been more clear. Thank 
you, thank you. But instead he wanted to stress  

much. So thank you became less clear. Thank 
you, thank you, thank you. Thank you very much.

Thank you very much–

It’s important that we don’t have that stress 
feel for every word. Thank you very much.  

Thank you very much. That stop sounding natural  

in American English. We have to have that 
contrast of the more clear and the less clear.

Thank you very much–

Thank you very much Mr. Twistle.

So we have a peak of stress on much. 
Much Mr. then Mr. becomes a little valley  

Mr. Twistle before our next peak of stress.

Much Mr. Twistle.

Hey, now you can call me Jay.

He says hey, hey. Just a little 
utterance. Not very clear, not very loud.  

Hey. Now you can call me Jay. And we have the 
stress on the first word and the last word there.  

The words in between, less clear, part 
of that valley. Hey, now you can call me.  

And we even have a reduction. How do you think 
this word is pronounced? You might think oh, I  

know that word. It’s can. But actually most of the 
time it’s not pronounced that way. Let’s listen.

Now you can call me Jay.

You can call me. You call me. I’m going to 
give a little bit of up down on call but can,  

what is happening to it? We reduced that and 
we have just the schwa instead of the ah vowel.  

Now schwa mixes with an, we kind of loose it 
all together. So it’s really just can, can, can  

like there’s no vowel at all. Now you 
can, now you can. And he even doesn’t  

make those consonant sounds very clear does 
he? That word is so fast. It almost gets lost.

You can call me–

Jay.

You can call me Jay. So a lot of rhythmic contrast 
there. You can so short. Call, a little longer.  

Jay, even longer. Me, also short. We 
love that contrast in American English.

You can call me Jay.

Alright.

Alright. Alright. Not very clear, he nods 
his head. Alright. I would still write  

that with an up-down shape of stress but 
it’s not very clear, it’s sort of mumbled

Alright.

Stop T at the end and probably no L 
sound. Just a,a,a. Alright, alright.

Alright.

We’ll talk to you soon.

We’ll talk to you soon. Two peaks of stress there. 
We’ll talk to you soon. And the other words less  

clear. We will, will becomes we’ll, we’ll. I 
would write that W schwa L. Not very clear. We’ll,  

we’ll, we’ll. We’ll talk. We’ll talk. Talk, 
another word with the silent L. We’ll talk.

We’ll talk–

We’ll talk to you soon.

We’ll talk to you. To and you, lower in pitch. 
Part of that valley and they’re not pronounced  

to you so fully pronounced we have to but 
reduced it becomes to with the schwa. To.  

You, fully pronounced has the U vowel as well 
but can reduce the schwa like it does here.  

So to you becomes to you, to you, to you. 
You can relax your mouth a lot more to say  

it that quickly. Try it. To you. To you. Talk 
to you. Talk to you soon. Important reductions.

We’ll talk to you soon.
Talk to you soon is way that you can end a  

phone conversation or a meeting with somebody and 
in this case, they will talk soon because they’re  

going to follow up on the job interview. But 
you can even say it when you’re not necessarily  

going to talk to that person soon. For example, 
yesterday I was talking to my aunt on the phone.  

We only talk like once a year maybe but 
when we hung up I said “Talk to you soon.”

We’ll talk to you soon.

Let’s listen to this scene one more time.

I love studying English 
movies like this. Don’t you? 

Put your suggestion for the 
next movie or even the next  

scene in the comments. Until then, keep 
your learning going now with this video  

and don’t forget to subscribe. I make new 
videos on the English language every Tuesday  

and I love to see you back here. That’s it 
and thanks so much for using Rachel’s English.

你告诉我你想通过电影学习英语。
你们中的很多人都推荐了一部威尔史密斯的电影,

《幸福的追求》。 顺便说一句,
这部电影的标题是故意

拼错的。 如果你要写这个
词,你肯定要使用 I。

我们将对
他的工作面试进行完整的发音研究。

因此,如果您打算很快用英语进行工作面试
,这对您来说可能很棒。

我们将研究减少、链接、压力。
构成

美式英语口语特征的所有事物。 你
会惊讶于你将学到什么。

与往常一样,如果您喜欢这个
视频或学到新东西,

请点赞并订阅,
别忘了点击通知铃。

让我们看一下我们将一起学习的剪辑。

克里斯,如果一个人不穿衬衫走进面试,你会怎么说

我雇用了他。 你打算说什么?

他一定穿了一些非常漂亮的裤子。

(笑)

克里斯

你真的成功了。
非常感谢 Twistle 先生。

嘿,现在你可以叫我杰了。
很快就会和你谈谈。

现在分析。

克里斯,

克里斯,他在说他的名字,
而且压力很大。 这就是

美式英语中重读音节的形式。
克里斯

我们的重读音节没有平调。 他们

的方向发生了变化。 通常,它会上升
然后下降,每隔一段时间就会

下降并重新上升。 但重要的是,
它不是平坦的。 克里斯,克里斯,克里斯。 克里斯。

克里斯 那里的 CH 字母发出 K
音。 美式英语中的 CH 可以

是 Chef 或 Chicago 中的 SH 音,
也可以是 Chris

或 choir 中的 K 音,当然也
可以是选择

Chris

What would you say

What would you say 中的 CH 音。 然后他稍作休息。
所以,当我们有很少的休息时,这意味着

单词没有联系在一起,会有一点
停顿,但除了那个休息之外,所有的东西都会

联系在一起,我们称之为思想组。 所以
他在 Chris 之后休息了一下。 他

说完就休息一下。 所以这四个词流畅地连接在一起
,我们不想要一种波涛汹涌的感觉。

思想组中的单词应该非常
流畅,旋律也应该流畅,旋律中

没有跳跃或跳跃。 那么让我们来
听听这句话的旋律。

你会

说什么——你会说什么。 你打算说什么。 所以会没有
压力,但是什么,一些长度

和上下形状,你也有一些
上下形状,然后我想说实际上

是相反的,开始回升。 因此,
当我们在乐句结尾处提高声音的旋律时,

这意味着我们将
继续。 这是一个我们有更多话要说的信号。

什么,什么会。 什么会。 这里的 T 是
一个未发布的停止 T,它不是 T,什么会,

什么会,而是什么会,什么会。
它也没有被丢弃。 这不是什么会,

什么会。 我们有那一点点
跳过那一点点电梯。 什么会。

什么会

——你的D音也没有释放。
不是你愿意,而是你愿意。

从 D 的声带振动

到 Y 辅音。 现在字母 L
in will 不发音了。 什么会。

你会说什么,

你会说什么。 连接顺畅,没有跳过
,如果您只练习前两个

单词 what 和 would ,请确保您在
那里感到与众不同。 有压力的,会是

无压力的,感觉不一样。
不是什么,会,而是什么会,什么会。

如果一个人
不穿衬衫走进面试,你会怎么说。

现在他完成了他的思想组。

如果一个人
不穿衬衫走进面试。

这真的是一个问题,不是吗? 他在说
什么,你会说什么。 他的语调

在结尾确实下降了。 所以有时人们
思考问题,语调总是上升。

但现在这确实是真的。 绝对是,否的
问题是正确的,但不能

用是或否回答的问题通常会
在最后下降,这就是这里发生的情况。

如果一个人
不穿衬衫走进面试。

所以让我们再看看这个思想
组。 我们有很多话,但没有休息。

不是一个人走进来。而是一个
人走进来。啊哈。 连接顺畅。

如果一个人走进来

让我们听听,看看你是否能识别。
我们的长音节有哪些音高变化?

如果一个人走进来

如果一个人走进来。如果一个人走进来,
有点对人,但真正的压力高峰

是走了。 如果和 a,它们
只是上升旋律的一部分。 如果a,

如果a,如果a,如果a。 不是如果 a,而是他们
说得很快,他们没有压力。 如果一个人走进来。

如果一个人走进来

走了。 这是另一个带有静音 L 的词,就像
会一样。 现在以 walk 这个词结尾的 ED

发音为 T。我们
为 ED 结尾提供了三种不同的发音。 我确实有

关于这些 ED 结尾的播放列表,因此您可以单击
此处或查看视频说明中的链接。

Walked in

Walked in, walk in

. T 刚刚自行释放。
它被释放到下一个单词中。

走进,走进。所以它不是那么强大,
它很微妙,但这种联系很重要。

因为在思想群体中,我们
希望声音持续流动。

走进去

面试,没穿衬衫。

走进面试,面试,
没有穿衬衫的压力更大。

所以走进来强调,对不起,衬衫是
我们那里压力最大的音节。 走后,

我们有一些不重读的音节,for,an
,它们没有完全像那样发音,

是吗? 为一个,为一个,
为一个,为一个,为一个。 你能

明白我说的是这三个字吗?
在一个。 它们都联系在一起,

减少这个词。 为,为。 你几乎可以
认为它根本没有任何元音。 这

是 schwa R 的声音。 R 直接链接到
我们文章的 schwa。 对于一个对于一个,

对于一个。 为一个,为一个,为一个。
实在不清楚。 这就是我们想要

的非重读音节。 我们已经步行和
采访了。 但是in for an变成了in for an。

换一个。 换一个。 我们需要
清晰和不清晰的对比。 现在您可能已经注意到

,在 interview 一词中,他去掉了 T 音。
这真的很常见。 N 之后的 T 尤其是在

单词部分 inter 中。 采访,互联网,
国际。 丢掉 T 真的很常见。

没穿衬衫就去面试

了 有点压力。 没有,
没有,没有,没有(襟翼)。

那个T怎么了? 这变成了一个襟翼 T。
我用字母 D 写它。因为它听起来

像美式英语中元音之间的 D。
但它出现在两个元音双元音之间

。 我们在单词 out 中有 OU 双元音
。 我们有 schwa,所以

这两个声音之间的 T 只是(拍打)会
拍打舌头。 没有一个,没有一个。

没有 -

面试和没有任何一个之间都没有休息
。 采访,

查看。 让声音持续
不断,没有断断续续的声音。

不穿衬衫的采访。

没穿衬衫。 现在这个 T 发生了什么
? 穿上衬衫。 (襟翼)。 这是另一个襟翼T,为什么? 它

不会出现在两个元音的双元音之间,
因为这是一个 R。Flap T 的规则

包括在元音或双元音之前的 R 之后。
所以就像在派对这个词中一样,那是一个襟翼 T,

它出现在元音或双元音之前的 R 之后。
在这句话上衬衫。 衬衫(襟翼)

上。没有衬衫的襟翼 T。

让我们只听不穿衬衫的慢动作,
这样你就可以真正专注于那些襟翼,

你没有听到 ttt,真正的 T.

不穿衬衫。

我雇用了他。

好的,他在这里还有一个思想小组
。 一切都联系在一起。 我

雇用了他。 一切都在朝着
我们动词的压力峰值上升。 而我

,我正处于压力高峰期。
我雇用了他。 一条线,顺畅连接。

我雇用了他。

我们有几个减少。 我们有,并且

D 被删除。 And I, and I. 而那个 N 辅音直接
连接到 I 双元音。 我雇用了他。

我雇用了他。

雇用了他。 雇用了他。 你能说
那里没有 H。 他不是说雇用他。

他说雇用他。 去掉 H,
在他、她、他的、他这个词中去掉 H 是很常见的

。 绝对
是我们做的事情。 然后我们将它链接

到之前的单词上。 所以这里的 ED 结尾
发出 D 音。 雇用了他。 雇用了他。

雇用了他。

你打算说什么?

我们这里有一个四字思想组。 一个词
是最重的。 让我们听

三遍。 你告诉我你的身体想往哪里移动,
你觉得压力最大的地方在哪里。 如果您

打算在压力下移动一次头部或移动
一次手。 你的身体会在哪里做到这一点?

你打算说什么?

你打算说什么? 啊哈。 我绝对
听说你是我们的一个重音词,

什么和会导致它
,然后说远离它。

你打算说什么?

什么。 停止 T 再次未释放。 我应该
用 Wh 词说,

在 what、what、white、why 之前有一个漏气的发音
。 你有没有注意到这一点?

这不再是很常见的了,他也不会做
那种逃逸的空气。 这只是一个干净的 W 声音。

什么会——

什么会,什么会。 现在我们有了一个
以 D 结尾的单词,下一个单词是你,

发音发生了一些有趣的事情。
听三遍,看看你能不能听到。

你会

怎样——你会怎样,你,你,你听到了吗?
这是一个非常清晰的J音。 朱,朱。 当一个词

以 D 结尾,而下一个词是你或你的时候,
听到它把它变成 J 的情况并不少见,

我认为这有助于将两个词平滑地连接
在一起。 我们喜欢

美式英语的流畅性。 你打算说什么? 然后
声音在音调中下降,一切都连接起来了。

你会——

你会说什么?

他一定穿了一些非常漂亮的裤子。

他一定吃过一些。 因此,在这个思想
组中,我们强调了第一个词。

他一定吃过一些。 然后我们有
一堆单词的压力较小,

音高比我们最后三个
单词的压力更长,更长。 真的很不错的裤子。

他一定穿了一些非常漂亮的裤子。

确保一切都连接
顺畅,但也要确保你有节奏的

对比。 加快这些词的速度,让它们变得不那么
清晰,我们需要它。 他一定吃过一些。

你注意到必须。 那里发生了什么?
have这个词一直被简化

为一个单一的声音。 施瓦,必须的。 一定
有一些。 D 襟翼,因为它链接,并继续。

一定有过一些

他一定有过一些——

还有一些。 没有真正完全发音。
我会用 schwa 而不是 UH 来写,

就像黄油声音一样。 一些,一些。 他
一定吃过一些。 他一定吃过一些。

他一定有过一些

——然后我们的最后三个词更清晰、
更长、上下的压力形状。

真的很不错的裤子。

真的很不错的裤子。 字裤。
元音有点棘手,它是 AH 元音,

就像在 bat 中一样,但是当它后面跟着 N 时,就像
在这里一样,我们在两者之间发出声音。 就像

黄油元音中的 UH 一样,舌后部放松。
所以不是啊,爸爸,裤子。 但它是 pae,[aeʌ

] 放松,它改变了声音。
佩,裤子。 裤子,裤子不是裤子。

裤子。

(笑)

克里斯..

克里斯。 克里斯。 再一次,就像一
开始我们有一个名字,一个专有名词,一个

重读的词,一个单音节,所以它
有上下的形状。 克里斯。 克里斯。

克里斯。

你真的把它拉到了那里。

你真的把它拉到了那里。 所以我们
真的有点压力。 你真的

拉了它。 但大部分时间都在那里。
大部分都处于关闭状态。 拔下来。 这是一个短语动词。

你真的把它拉到了那里。

它有几个不同的含义。 在
这种情况下,它意味着在某事上取得成功

,实现某事。 他接受了一次采访

,他们很喜欢他。 他在
那次面试中取得了成功,他真的成功了。

你真的把它拉到了那里。

以 pull 结尾的 ed 只是 D 音
,它直接连接到 e 元音,

为了平滑。 拉了,拉了。
你真的成功了。 现在我们

在元音之间有了一个 T。 让我们听听。

它关闭 -

它关闭,它关闭(襟翼)。 是的,绝对是一个皮瓣。

你知道,我们在美式英语发音中没有很多规则可以
让人们遵循,但是拍打

T,我们很好地遵循了这一点。 在两个元音
或双元音之间,或在元音或双元音之前的 R 之后,

我们拍打它。 把它拉下来了。
关了,关了,关了。 把它拉了进去。

把它拉了进去。

如果它可以帮助您更顺畅地链接
,请将结尾辅音视为下一个

单词的开头。 因此,您可以不考虑考虑,而是考虑
考虑。 关进去,关进去,关在那里。

关在那里。

非常感谢 Twistle 先生。

所以他强调了“非常感谢”这个词,
而不是像非常感谢 Twistle 先生那样说得很清楚

。 当然,还要强调
名称。 但这是一种很好的方式来显示

重音词 much 和非重音
词thank you 之间的对比。 所以如果他说的只是谢谢

你,那可能会更清楚。
谢谢谢谢。 但相反,他想强调

很多。 所以谢谢你变得不太清楚。
谢谢你,谢谢你,谢谢你。 非常感谢你。

非常感谢——

重要的是我们不要
对每个字都感到压力。 非常感谢你。

非常感谢你。 这

在美式英语中听起来不自然。 我们必须有
更清晰和更不清晰的对比。

非常

感谢——非常感谢 Twistle 先生。

所以我们对很多事情都感到压力很大。

在我们的下一个压力高峰之前,很多先生然后先生变成了一个小山谷先生。

多特威斯特先生。

嘿,现在你可以叫我杰了。

他说嘿嘿。 只是一点点的
话语。 不是很清楚,不是很响亮。

嘿。 现在你可以叫我杰了。 我们
强调第一个词和最后一个词。

中间的话,不太清楚,
是那个山谷的一部分。 嘿,现在你可以给我打电话了。

我们甚至有减少。 您认为
这个词的发音如何? 你可能会想,哦,我

知道这个词。 可以。 但实际上大多数
时候它并不是那样发音的。 让我们听听。

现在你可以叫我杰了。

你可以联系我。 你给我打电话。 我
会随叫随到,但可以,

发生了什么? 我们减少了它,
我们只有 schwa 而不是 ah 元音。

现在 schwa 与一种混合在一起,我们有点松散了
。 所以它真的只是可以,可以,可以

就像根本没有元音一样。 现在你
可以了,现在你可以了。 他甚至没有

把那些辅音发音很清楚,
不是吗? 这个词来得太快了。 它几乎迷路了。

你可以叫我——

杰。

你可以叫我杰。 那里有很多节奏
对比。 你可以这么短。 打电话,再等一会。

杰,甚至更长。 我,也很矮。 我们
喜欢美式英语中的这种对比。

你可以叫我杰。

好吧。

好吧。 好吧。 不是很清楚,他点了点
头。 好吧。 我仍然

会用上下压力的形式来写它,
但不是很清楚,它有点喃喃自语

好吧。

在结尾停止 T 并且可能没有 L
声音。 只是一个,一个,一个。 好吧好吧。

好吧。

我们很快就会和你谈谈。

我们很快就会和你谈谈。 那里有两个压力高峰。
我们很快就会和你谈谈。 其他词不太

清楚。 我们会,会变成我们会,我们会。 我
会写 W schwa L。不太清楚。 我们会,

我们会,我们会。 我们会谈谈。 我们会谈谈。 说话,
与沉默的 L 的另一个词。我们会说话。

我们会谈谈——

我们很快就会和你谈谈。

我们会和你谈谈。 To and you, 音调较低。
那个山谷的一部分,它们

对你来说并没有发音,所以我们不得不把
它简化为 schwa。 到。

你,完全发音也有 U 元音,
但可以像这里一样减少 schwa。

所以对你变成对你,对你,对你。
你可以放松嘴巴,

这么快说出来。 试试看。 给你。 给你。
跟你说话。 以后再聊。 重要的削减。

我们很快就会和你谈谈。
尽快与您交谈是您可以结束

电话交谈或与某人会面的方式,
在这种情况下,他们将很快交谈,因为他们

将跟进工作面试。 但是
,当您不一定要很快与那个人交谈时,您甚至可以说出来

。 例如,
昨天我正在和姑姑通电话。

我们可能一年只谈一次,
但当我们挂断电话时,我说“尽快和你谈谈”。

我们很快就会和你谈谈。

让我们再听一遍这个场景。

我喜欢学习这样的英语
电影。 不是吗? 在评论中

提出您对
下一部电影甚至下一

场景的建议。 在此之前,请
通过此视频继续学习

,不要忘记订阅。 我
每周二都会制作新的英语视频

,我很高兴在这里见到你。 就是
这样,非常感谢您使用 Rachel 的英语。