FAST ENGLISH The 1 Secret is REDUCTIONS

How do Americans do it?

How do they speak so quickly but still sound natural and are still easily understood by other native speakers?

Well, it’s because of something
called reductions.

American English is full of them, and today, we’ve invited standout Rachel’s English teacher, Tom Kelly,

to teach you and show you some reductions,

and not just a single reduction, but
several reductions in a row.

For example, how does the phrase ‘because it was a’ become: because it was a–?

How does it become that?

How does that sound natural? How does
that work in American English?

That’s what we’re going to study today.

Now first, I want to make sure you know
this is not lazy English,

this is not only conversational English,

this is even English that you might use in
a more formal setting.

All of the examples that Tom is going to use today are from either a TED Talk or an interview.

So a more formal situation, then just a
conversation with a friend.

We’re going to have Tom take it over in just a second,

but before we do, please subscribe with notifications if you haven’t already.

We make new videos on the English language every Tuesday and we love to see you back here again.

Okay, Tom. Take it away.

Hi! I’m Tom Kelly, a Rachel’s English teacher with Rachel’s English Academy.

Here at Rachel’s English, we talk about the rhythm and intonation of English all the time.

We hope non-native speakers hear the
music of English

so they can speak the language with
more accuracy and consistency,

helping them sound more like native speakers of the language.

If you’re someone who wants to know how to speak faster English but still be understood

and sound natural, this is a video for you.

One aspect of creating the music of American English

is making sure you have unstressed and stressed syllables in your speech

and that there is a clear contrast
between the two.

The unstressed syllables will be short and quick and produced with less vocal energy,

and the stressed syllables will be longer.

They’ll use the shape of stress and are produced with more vocal energy.

One of the things that helps create
better contrast

between your stressed and
unstressed syllables

is using reductions.

Now, Rachel has lots of
videos on reduction.

reduction is when we reduce the sounds
of a function word, words like:

the, of, for, your, and others, and don’t say them fully.

for example, ‘the’ is often pronounced as:
the, the, as in: she’s the best.

the, the. she’s the best.

‘Of’ is pronounced: of– or even just: uh,
uh– with a dropped V.

here’s a sentence with both of those
reductions of the word ‘of’.

I’ll take one of all of them.

I’ll take one of all of them.

‘For’ and ‘your’, both reduced down to just
an unstressed R vowel.

For, your. This is for your birthday.

This is for your birthday.

For your, for your.

What’s amazing about reduction is that native speakers use it all the time.

But if you ask them about it, they probably
don’t even know they’re doing it.

It is such a natural part of their speech they don’t even recognize it.

In fact, Rachel has received comments from native speakers on some of her reduction videos

saying that she’s teaching incorrect English, that reductions are only used in casual, lazy English.

But we guarantee that any native speaker
of English who does not use reductions

will actually sound overly formal and may
even be harder to understand.

Today, I’m going to demonstrate how reductions are used in a variety of American English speech.

Even in formal environments.

We’re going to take a look at a few common phrases and see how we reduce the function words

in order to sound more natural and create the music of American English.

So let’s get started.

First up, the phrase: for the, or: for the, for the.

This two-word phrase, two function words, is very often pronounced as ‘for the–’

in both casual and more formal situations.

Pronounced fully, these two words would sound like: for the– for the– but reduced, they become:

for the– F consonant, unstressed R vowel, voiced TH consonant and schwa.

For the– for the–

Here are some examples from TED talks and speeches where the speakers use this reduction.

We’ve got to keep fighting for the dignity of every veteran.

Did you hear the reduction?

For the– fighting for the dignity of every veteran.

Let’s listen again.

We’ve got to keep fighting for the dignity of every veteran.

For the–
for the dignity of every veteran.

We’ve got to keep fighting for the dignity of every veteran.

And that’s the President of the United States.

Now, here’s another one.

Or do you want me to hire the best person for the job?

Best person for the job.

For the– for the–

Or do you want me to hire the best person for the job?

For the– for the job?

Or do you want me to hire the best person for the job?

Okay, here are three more.

Teach them to yearn for the vast and endless sea.

For the–
for the vast and endless sea.

Teach them to yearn for the vast and endless sea.

But a hundred and fifty, you can read over and over for the rest of your life.

For the–
for the rest of your life.

But a hundred and fifty, you can read over and over for the rest of your life.

They do fill certain gaps in skills and knowledge that are good for the overall economy.

For the–
for the overall economy.

They do fill certain gaps in skills and knowledge that are good for the overall economy.

So obviously, for the– is used very commonly in formal speech as well as casual English.

Now, let’s take a look at the three-word
phrase ‘and in the’.

Pronounced fully, it would sound like this:
and in the– and in the–

but it’s almost never spoken like this in any circumstance.

Usually, all of these words are spoken quickly,

and, reduces to a schwa sound followed
by an N consonant, and, and.

The D is usually dropped.

The in, IN, becomes just a quick N consonant.

And in, and in, and in.

Or unstressed IH as in sit vowel followed
by an N consonant.

And in, and in, and in.

And ‘the’ reduces the same way, it reduces in ‘for the’. The, the, and in the– and in the– and in the–

Let’s hear some examples of this reduction in more formal environments.

Of what we have to do to meet this challenge.

And in the years ahead we will need an all-out global commitment to clean air.

And in the years ahead–

and in the–

Do you hear those three quick unstressed syllables?

And in the– and in the–

And in the–

and in the years ahead of what we have to do to meet this challenge.

And in the years ahead we will need an all-out global commitment to clean air.

Here’s another one.

You have to find the younger rocks of the Mesozoic. And in the case of dinosaurs, between 235

and 66 million years ago.

This one is very fast.

And in the– and in the–

And in the–

and in the case of dinosaurs between 235–

You have to find the younger rocks of the Mesozoic.

And in the case of dinosaurs, between 235 and 66 million years ago.

Okay, here are a few more examples of ‘and in the’ reduction in formal speech.

And in the fight against poverty, we’re treating governments–

And in the— And in the fight against poverty–

And in the fight against poverty, we’re treating governments–

So I was always gone a lot and in the book, I actually say that my youngest son drew me as a laptop.

And in the–

and in the book, I actually say that my youngest son drew me as a laptop.

So I was always gone a lot and in the book, I actually say that my youngest son drew me as a laptop.

And that is a really useful practice in
small and in the big.

And in the– and in the big.

And that is a really useful practice in
small and in the big.

Let’s take a listen to a few commonly
reduced and combined words.

Very often, ‘going to’ reduces to: gonna, gonna.

‘Want to’ reduces to: wanna, wanna.

And ‘got to’ reduces to: gotta, gotta.

This doesn’t just happen in casual speech.

Let’s take a look at some examples from
formal situations.

Here is ‘going to’ pronounced as: gonna, gonna.

Then they’re probably not going to want to
listen to me doing breathe.

Notice in that one we actually have
‘gonna’ and ‘wanna’.

Then they’re probably not going to want to
listen to me doing breathe.

Gonna–

Wanna–

Going to want to listen to me–

Then they’re probably not going to want to listen to me doing breathe.

Now here’s a few more.

We’re going to see more cancer.

Gonna–

we’re going to see more cancer.

That all of those people who had adored eat, pray, love,

were going to be incredibly disappointed in whatever i wrote next.

Gonna–

were going to be incredibly disappointed in whatever i wrote next.

That all of those people who had adored eat, pray, love,

were going to be incredibly disappointed in whatever i wrote next.

Now let’s listen to examples of the
reduction of ‘want to’, wanna.

There are some in Washington who want
to shut them down.

Wanna– wanna shut them down.

There are some in Washington who want
to shut them down.

Connected to all the different places they want to be.

Wanna– want to be.

Connected to all the different places they want to be.

In order to live the lives that we say we want to live.

Wanna– wanna live.

In order to live the lives that we say we want to live.

And now ‘got to’ as ‘gotta’.

In this environment today, we’ve got to
think of it all as one piece.

Gotta–
gotta think of it all as one piece.

In this environment today, we’ve got to think of it all as one piece.

If you want exponential growth, then you’ve got to be able to experience exponential productivity.

Gotta–got to be able to experience exponential productivity.

If you want exponential growth, then you’ve got to be able to experience exponential productivity.

And what can be accomplished in business, but we’ve got to have leadership.

Gotta–

And what can be accomplished in business, but we’ve got to have leadership.

And what can be accomplished in business, but we’ve got to have leadership.

Okay so hopefully by now it’s clear that reductions are not just used in casual conversations.

They’re a part of the music of American
English in all situations.

From the boardroom, to interviews, to
speeches, to offices, and on and on.

They’re a part of American English.

Just for fun, here are a few more examples.

Here’s the phrase: because it was a. Or reduced: because it was a– because it was a–

And when I was in business school I’d asked my

instructors because it was a big business school and there was, it was always about big business.

Notice she reduces each of these function words and links them all together,

saying them very quickly.

Because it was a– because it was a–

Because it was a–

because it was a big business school.

And when I was in business school I’d asked my instructors because it was a big business school

and there was, it was always about big business.

Here’s another example of: because it was a– being reduced.

Remember the TV show that was shot down by NBC because it was a show about nothing?

Because it was a–

because it was a a show about nothing?

Remember the TV show that was shot down by NBC because it was a show about nothing?

Here’s one more and see if you can hear how this one reduces even further.

But the reason she was unavailable to speak with me is that she was out for a hike

because it was a beautiful spring morning.

In this one, the word ‘because’ reduces all the way down to just: cuz, cuz– The first syllable is completely dropped.

And this is on stage, in front of an audience, and everyone still understands her.

Because it was a– because it was a–

But the reason she was unavailable to speak with me is that she was out for a hike

because it was a beautiful spring morning.

Because it was a–

because it was a beautiful spring morning.

But the reason she was unavailable to speak with me is that she was out for a hike

because it was a beautiful spring morning.

Okay, this is actually very fun for me.

I love reductions. Let’s do a couple more.

Here are examples of the phrase: that it was a–

reduced down to: that it was a– that it was a–

And concluded that it was a match.

That it was a– that it was a match.

And concluded that it was a match.

Well, they explained to me that it was a new Department

that had just been formed at Harvard where you could get a phd in the history of science.

That it was a– that it was a new Department–

Well, they explained to me that it was a new Department

that had just been formed at Harvard where you could get a phd in the history of science.

You know the historians tell us that it was a uniquely American idea.

That it was a– that it was a uniquely American idea.

You know the historians tell us that it was a uniquely American idea.

This is incredible.

We just heard so many examples of reductions and all of them were in more formal environments.

It really does happen all the time in American English.

Start listening for this in the English you
hear around you.

Listen for it in TV shows and movies and
office meetings.

The more you start hearing it,

the more you’ll be able to start using it

in your own speech to enhance the musicality of your American English.

I used Youglish.com to pull these clips
that I used in this video.

It’s a great resource to use when practicing your pronunciation.

Rachel actually made a video a while ago
on how to use Youglish.com

and I’m going to link to that video at the
end of this video.

That’s it for now. Happy reducing!

And thank you for using Rachel’s English.

Tom, thank you so much. Here’s that
video he mentioned on how to use Youglish

Please subscribe if you haven’t already.

We make new videos on the English language every Tuesday, and we’d love to have you back.

That’s it and thanks so much for using Rachel’s English.

美国人是怎么做到的?

他们为什么说得这么快,但听起来很自然,而且其他母语人士仍然很容易理解?

嗯,这是因为一种
叫做减少的东西。

美式英语充满了它们,今天,我们邀请了 Rachel 的杰出英语老师 Tom Kelly

来教你,并给你展示一些减法,

而不是单次减法,而是
连续数次减法。

例如,短语“because it was a”如何变成:because it was a–?

怎么会变成这样?

这听起来自然吗?
这在美式英语中是如何工作的?

这就是我们今天要学习的内容。

现在首先,我想确保您知道
这不是懒惰的英语,

这不仅是会话

英语,甚至是您可以
在更正式的环境中使用的英语。

汤姆今天要使用的所有例子都来自 TED 演讲或采访。

所以更正式的情况,然后只是
和朋友的谈话。

我们将让汤姆在一秒钟内接管它,

但在我们这样做之前,如果您还没有订阅通知,请订阅。

我们每周二都会制作新的英语视频,我们很高兴再次见到您。

好的,汤姆。 把它拿开。

你好! 我是汤姆·凯利,是瑞秋英语学院的瑞秋英语老师。

在Rachel’s English,我们一直在谈论英语的节奏和语调。

我们希望非母语人士能听到
英语的音乐,

这样他们就可以
更准确、更一致地说出这种语言,

帮助他们听起来更像母语人士。

如果您想知道如何说更快的英语,但仍能被理解

并听起来自然,那么这是一个适合您的视频。

创造美式英语音乐的一个方面

是确保你的演讲中有非重读音节和重读音节,

并且两者之间有明显的对比

非重读音节短而快,声音能量较少

,重读音节较长。

他们将使用压力的形状,并产生更多的声音能量。

有助于

在重读
音节和非重读音节之间形成更好对比的一件事

是使用减少。

现在,Rachel 有很多
关于还原的视频。

减少是当我们减少
功能词的声音时,例如:

the, of, for, your, and others,并且不完整地说出来。

例如,“the”通常发音为:
the、the,如:she’s the best。

那个,那个。 她是最棒的。

‘of’ 的发音是:of– 甚至只是:uh,
uh– 带有一个下降的 V。

这里有一个句子,其中有两个
单词 ‘of’ 的简化。

我将采取其中之一。

我将采取其中之一。

‘For’ 和 ‘your’ 都简化为
一个不重读的 R 元音。

为您。 这是给你的生日礼物。

这是给你的生日礼物。

为你,为你。

减少的惊人之处在于母语人士一直使用它。

但如果你问他们,他们可能
甚至不知道他们正在这样做。

这是他们讲话中很自然的一部分,他们甚至都认不出来。

事实上,Rachel 收到了母语人士对她的一些缩减视频的

评论,说她在教不正确的英语,缩减只用于休闲、懒惰的英语。

但我们保证,任何
不使用缩减的以英语为母语的

人实际上听起来过于正式,
甚至可能更难理解。

今天,我将演示如何在各种美式英语演讲中使用缩减。

即使在正式环境中。

我们将看一些常见的短语,看看我们如何减少功能词

,以便听起来更自然并创造美式英语的音乐。

所以让我们开始吧。

首先,短语:for the,或:for the,for the。

这个由两个词组成的短语,两个虚词,在休闲和正式场合都经常被发音为“for the–”

完全发音,这两个词听起来像:for the– for the- 但减少,它们变成:

for the– F 辅音,非重读 R 元音,浊 TH 辅音和 schwa。

对于–对于–

下面是一些来自 TED 演讲和演讲的例子,演讲者使用了这种缩减。

我们必须继续为每位退伍军人的尊严而战。

你听说减价了吗?

为了——为每一位退伍军人的尊严而战。

让我们再听一遍。

我们必须继续为每位退伍军人的尊严而战。

为了——
为了每一个退伍军人的尊严。

我们必须继续为每位退伍军人的尊严而战。

那就是美国总统。

现在,这是另一个。

或者你想让我为这份工作聘请最合适的人选?

工作的最佳人选。

为了–为了–

或者你想让我为这份工作雇佣最合适的人吗?

为了——为了工作?

或者你想让我为这份工作聘请最合适的人选?

好的,这里还有三个。

教他们向往广阔无垠的大海。

为了——
为了浩瀚无垠的大海。

教他们向往广阔无垠的大海。

但是一百五十,您可以在余生中一遍又一遍地阅读。

为了你的余生。

但是一百五十,您可以在余生中一遍又一遍地阅读。

它们确实填补了对整体经济有益的技能和知识方面的某些空白。

对于–
对于整体经济。

它们确实填补了对整体经济有益的技能和知识方面的某些空白。

很明显,for the– 在正式演讲和休闲英语中都非常常用。

现在,让我们看一下
“and in the”这三个词的短语。

完全发音时,听起来像这样:
and in the- and in the-

但在任何情况下几乎从来没有这样说。

通常,所有这些词都说得很快,

并且,减少为 schwa 声音,
后跟 N 辅音,and,and。

D 通常被丢弃。

in,IN,只是一个快速的 N 辅音。

And in, and in, and in.

或非重读 IH,如坐元音
后跟 N 辅音。

And in, and in, and in.

和’the’以同样的方式减少,它减少’for the'。 The, the, and in the- 和 in the- 和 in the–

让我们听听一些在更正式的环境中这种减少的例子。

我们必须做些什么来迎接这一挑战。

在未来的几年里,我们将需要对清洁空气做出全面的全球承诺。

在未来的岁月

里——以及未来——

你听到这三个快速的无重读音节了吗?

在 - 和 -

在 -

和 - 以及未来几年我们必须做些什么来迎接这一挑战。

在未来的几年里,我们将需要对清洁空气做出全面的全球承诺。

这是另一个。

你必须找到中生代较年轻的岩石。 就恐龙而言,在 2.35

至 6600 万年前。

这个速度非常快。

并且在 - 并且在 -

并且在 -

以及在 235 年之间的恐龙的情况下 -

你必须找到中生代的较年轻的岩石。

就恐龙而言,在 2.35 至 6600 万年前。

好的,这里有几个减少正式演讲的“和”的例子。

在与贫困的斗争中,我们正在对待政府——

在——在与贫困的斗争中——在与

贫困的斗争中,我们正在对待政府——

所以我总是走了很多, 在书中,我实际上说我的小儿子把我画成了一台笔记本电脑。

在——

和书中,我实际上说我的小儿子把我画成了一台笔记本电脑。

所以我经常离开,在书中,我实际上说我的小儿子把我画成了一台笔记本电脑。

这是一个非常有用的做法,无论是在
小型还是大型。

而在 - 和大。

这是一个非常有用的做法,无论是在
小型还是大型。

让我们来听一些常用的
简化和组合词。

很多时候,‘going to’ 会简化为: going to,要去。

“想要”简化为:想要,想要。

并且“必须”简化为:必须,必须。

这不仅仅发生在随意的演讲中。

让我们看一些来自
正式场合的例子。

这里的“去”发音为:去,去。

然后他们可能不
想听我做呼吸。

请注意,我们实际上有
“要”和“想要”。

然后他们可能不
想听我做呼吸。

要– 想要– 想听我的–

然后他们可能不想听我呼吸。

现在还有一些。

我们会看到更多的癌症。

会 -

我们会看到更多的癌症。

所有那些喜欢吃、祈祷、爱的人,

都会对我接下来写的任何东西感到难以置信的失望。

会——无论我接下来写什么,都会非常失望。

所有那些喜欢吃、祈祷、爱的人,

都会对我接下来写的任何东西感到难以置信的失望。

现在让我们听听
‘want to’,wann的减少的例子。

华盛顿有些人
想关闭它们。

想要——想要关闭它们。

华盛顿有些人
想关闭它们。

连接到他们想去的所有不同的地方。

想要——想要成为。

连接到他们想去的所有不同的地方。

为了过上我们说我们想要过的生活。

想——想活下去。

为了过上我们说我们想要过的生活。

而现在“得”为“得”。

在今天的这种环境下,我们必须
将其视为一个整体。

得——得把它当作一个整体。

在今天的这种环境下,我们必须将其视为一个整体。

如果你想要指数增长,那么你必须能够体验指数生产力。

必须——必须能够体验指数级的生产力。

如果你想要指数增长,那么你必须能够体验指数生产力。

在商业中可以完成什么,但我们必须有领导力。

必须——在商业中可以完成什么,但我们必须有领导力。

在商业中可以完成什么,但我们必须有领导力。

好的,希望现在很明显,减少不仅用于休闲对话。

在所有情况下,它们都是美式英语音乐的一部分。

从会议室,到采访,到
演讲,到办公室,等等。

它们是美式英语的一部分。

只是为了好玩,这里还有几个例子。

这句话是:因为它是一个。 或者减少:因为它是-因为它是

-当我在商学院时,我问过我的

导师,因为这是一所大商学院,而且总是关于大生意。

请注意,她减少了这些功能词中的每一个并将它们连接在一起,

并且非常快速地说出它们。

因为它是——因为它是——

因为它是——

因为它是一所大型商学院。

当我在商学院时,我问过我的导师,因为那是一所大商学院

,而且一直都是关于大企业的。

这是另一个例子:因为它是– 被缩减。

还记得那个被 NBC 击落的电视节目,因为它是一个无关紧要的节目吗?

因为它是一个——

因为它是一个无关紧要的节目?

还记得那个被 NBC 击落的电视节目,因为它是一个无关紧要的节目吗?

这里还有一个,看看你是否能听到这个是如何进一步减少的。

但她无法与我交谈的原因是她出去远足,

因为那是一个美丽的春天早晨。

在这一个中,“因为”这个词一直减少到只是:cuz,cuz——第一个音节被完全删除。

而这是在舞台上,在观众面前,大家还是理解她的。

因为那是——因为那是——

但是她不能和我说话的原因是她出去远足,

因为那是一个美丽的春天早晨。

因为那是——

因为那是一个美丽的春天早晨。

但她无法与我交谈的原因是她出去远足,

因为那是一个美丽的春天早晨。

好吧,这对我来说实际上很有趣。

我喜欢减价。 让我们再做几个。

以下是该短语的示例

: that it was a– 简化为: that it is a– that it is a-

并得出结论,这是一个匹配项。

这是一场比赛。

并得出结论,这是一场比赛。

好吧,他们向我解释说,这是一个

刚刚在哈佛成立的新系,在那里你可以获得科学史的博士学位。

那是一个——这是一个新的系——

嗯,他们向我解释说,这是一个

刚刚在哈佛成立的新系,在那里你可以获得科学史的博士学位。

你知道历史学家告诉我们这是一个独特的美国想法。

这是一个——这是一个独特的美国想法。

你知道历史学家告诉我们这是一个独特的美国想法。

这难以置信。

我们刚刚听到了很多减少的例子,而且都是在更正式的环境中。

它确实在美式英语中一直在发生。

开始用你周围听到的英语听这个

在电视节目、电影和
办公室会议中聆听。

您开始听到

的越多,您就越能开始

在自己的演讲中使用它来增强您的美式英语的音乐性。

我使用 Youglish.com 提取
了我在此视频中使用的这些剪辑。

在练习发音时,这是一个很好的资源。

实际上,Rachel 不久前制作了一个
关于如何使用 Youglish.com 的

视频,我将在视频末尾链接到
该视频。

现在就是这样。 快乐减少!

感谢您使用 Rachel 的英语。

汤姆,非常感谢。 这是
他提到的关于如何使用 Youglish 的视频

如果您还没有订阅,请订阅。

我们每周二都会制作新的英语视频,希望您能回来。

就是这样,非常感谢您使用 Rachel 的英语。