Learn English with Movies Captain Marvel

In the US, summer is for sand, sun, and blockbuster
movies. And this summer, we’re going to use

those movies to learn English and study how
to sound American.

Every video this summer is going to be a study English with movies video.

We’ll pull scenes from the summer’s hottest movies, as well as favorite movies from years past.

It’s amazing what we can discover by studying even a small bit of English dialogue.

We’ll study how to understand movies,

what makes Americans sound American, and of
course, any interesting vocabulary phrasal

verbs or idioms that come up in the scenes
we study.

I call this kind of exercise a Ben Franklin Exercise.

First, we’ll watch the
scene. Then we’ll do an in-depth analysis

of what we hear together. This is going to
be so much fun! Be sure to tell your friends

and spread the word that all summer long,
every tuesday, we’re studying English with

movies here at Rachel’s English.

If you’re new to my channel click subscribe
and don’t forget the notification button.

Let’s get started. First, the scene.

You want to get personal.

Where were you born?

Huntsville, Alabama. But technically, I don’t
remember that part.

First job?
Soldier. Straight out of high school.

Left the ranks a full bird colonel.
Then?

Spy.
Where?

It was the Cold War, we were everywhere.
Now?

Been riding a desk for the past six years,
trying to figure out where future enemies

are coming from. Never occurred to me they
would be coming from above.

Now the analysis.

You want to get personal.

I love this sentence because there’s such

contrast between the stressed and unstressed
syllables and words. He really stresses the

word ‘you’ at the beginning.

You want to get personal.

You want to get personal.

You want to get personal.

You want to get personal. And in the stressed
syllable of ‘per’, the first syllable is also

stressed, but the three words ‘want to get’
are all much lower in pitch, much less clear,

flatter than the ‘you’, up-down shape, higher
pitch of the stressed word ‘you’.

You want to get personal.

You want to get personal.

You want to get personal.

Listen to just ‘want to get’.

Want to get–

Want to get– want to get– want to get–
Much less clear than ‘you’. Now listen to

the word ‘you’ with ‘want to get’ together,
stressed and then unstressed.

You want to get–

A big difference there in the quality of those
stressed versus unstressed syllables. We have

a reduction. ‘want to’ becomes ‘wanna’.

Want to get– want to get– want to get–

And the word ‘get’ has a Stop T because the
next word begins with a consonant.

Get, get, get, get, want to get, want to get.

Want to get–
want to get– want to get personal.

Hey guys! I wanted to pop in here to tell you that Skillshare is again sponsoring this video.

Now, I know that you do a lot of learning online and I do too!

And Skillshare is a great place to go and to continue that learning.

You may have noticed about a month ago, I made a video called my morning routine.

And in that video, as I was making it, I found out that vlogging is actually kind of hard.

It’s definitely its own separate skill.

I found Skillshare has a course from an awesome YouTuber on vlogging that I’d like to take.

Come to Skillshare and search on whatever your interest is.

You’ll find courses in English so you’ll be able to study vocabulary,

and phrases used when talking about this topic you’re passionate about.

It’s twice the learning!

If you sign up, tell me in the comments below what course you end up taking

I’m so interested in learning more about you guys!

Follow this link or the link in the video description for your own code to get 2 months FREE!

Okay, let’s get back to the analysis.

You want to get personal.

Then the unstressed syllables, son–, al–,
both said really quickly, those both have

the schwa, and in both of these cases, they’re
followed by a syllabic consonant, that means

the consonant takes over the schwa. We don’t
make a separate vowel sound. So we go right

from S into N. Sn, sn, sn– person, person.
And then right from N into L, without making

any kind of vowel sound. Nal, nal, nal, nal.

Now, this is a Dark L, which does have a vowel-like quality.

You want to get personal.

You want to get personal.

You want to get personal.

You want to get personal.

Whoa! Different day, different outfit, important
announcement. Did you know that with this

video, I made a free audio lesson that you
can download? In fact, I’m doing this for

each one of the youtube videos I’m making
this summer, all 11 of the learn English with

movies videos. So follow this link, or find
the link in the video description to get your

free downloadable audio lesson. It’s where
you’re going to train all of the things that

you’ve learned about pronunciation in this
video. Back to the lesson.

Now, here is how Americans make the L in this
case. It’s a Dark L, it’s at the end of a

thought group, it doesn’t link into anything.
We make that without lifting the tongue tip.

Can you do that too? We make the Dark L with
the back part of the tongue. Uhl, uhl. Back

part of the tongue presses down a little bit,
uhl, uhl, while the tongue tip stays forward.

I find that most of my students are so heavily
trained in lifting their tongue tip, that it’s

a very difficult habit to break. I want
to challenge you to do this. Per-so-nal–

uhl– your tongue is lifted for the N, bring
it back down, nal– uhl– and use the back

of the tongue to make the dark sound for the
Dark L.

Personal.

Where were you born?

She’s speaking quickly here without much emotion,
very straight faced. Where were you born?

Where and born, both are stressed words there.

Where were you born?

Where were you born?

Where were you born?

Where were you born?
They both have that up-down shape, were you–

on the other hand, are much flatter, much
faster. Were you, were you, were you.

The word ‘born’ this would be written with the
AW as in law vowel, followed by R. When these

two sounds come together in the same syllable,
like here, the AW as in law vowel is not pure.

It’s not AW but it’s owh. My lips round more,
the tongue pulls back a little bit, born,

born. Where were you born?

Where were you born?

Where were you born?

Where were you born?

Huntsville, Alabama but technically, I don’t remember that part.

So this is a longer thought group. He says:
Huntsville, Alabama but technically, I don’t

remember that part. No brakes. If it’s no
brakes, then that means it’s one thought group.

So I’ve written in here with Huntsville Alabama,
on this slide, and on the next slide, is the

second half of the thought group, but he didn’t
actually put a break there.

Huntsville, Alabama but technically, I don’t
remember that part.

Huntsville, Alabama but technically, I don’t
remember that part.

Huntsville, Alabama but technically, I don’t
remember that part.

The stress of these multi-syllable words,
we have huntsville, first syllable stress,

Alabama, so the most stressed syllable is
bam–, and the first level has a little secondary

stress, so I would put the primary stress
marker there, secondary stress marker there.

The other two A’s are schwas. Actually, just
a few weeks ago on the channel, I made a video

of how to go over the pronunciation of the
50 states and their capitals, we talked about

the four A’s in this word. Click here or in
the video description to check out that video

that goes over the pronunciation of the 50
states.

Huntsville, Alabama

Huntsville, Alabama

Huntsville, Alabama but technically, I don’t
remember that part.

But technically, I don’t remember that part.
Our stressed syllables, very clear, but tech–

but technically, I don’t remember that part.
Those have higher pitch, they have the up-down

shape, that curve. The rest is a little bit
flatter. It’s either leading up to a peak,

or falling away from a peak.

But tech– but, but–

But technically, I don’t remember that part.

But technically, I don’t remember that part.

But technically, I don’t remember that part.

Now we have an ending T, and a beginning T.
Those will combine into a single sound, one

true T, but technically, but technically.

But technically, but technically, but technically.

He’s pronouncing this word as three syllables,
first syllable stress, tech– and the ch here

makes a hard K sound. Tech-nic– the C here
makes a hard K sound. Tech-nic-lly– and then

he’s not pronouncing this at all, just an
LY ending then. Tech-nic-lly– technically.

Technically.

Technically, I don’t
remember that part.

And all of these words linked together really
smoothly. Technically, I don’t re–

Okay what’s happening with the N apostrophe
T contraction? We have lots of different ways

we pronounce that. And in this particular
case, I think I’m actually hearing the whole

thing dropped. Doh remember– doh, doh. So
we have the D consonant, oh diphthong, and

then I hear that linking right on to the next
sound, which is the R.

I don’t remember that part.

I don’t remember that part.

I don’t remember that part.

Now, it doesn’t sound like ‘do’ because ‘do’
has different sounds. It has the D consonant,

and the oo vowel. So the fact that we have
this oh diphthong, that’s how we know it’s

the negative. Doh– don’t remember. Don’t
remember. But I actually, I definitely don’t

hear the T. For a second, I listened to it
on a loop, I was asking myself: do I hear

a light quick N? I don’t think I really do.
I think it’s just dropped. Don’t remember.

Don’t remember. Don’t remember. Don’t remember.
Doh, oh, oh, oh, oh. Just the OH diphthong

right into the R. Isn’t it crazy? We can pronounce
this contraction without the N apostrophe

T at all, without the part that makes it a
negative. But I still hear it as that word

because of the OH diphthong.

I don’t remember that part.

I don’t remember that part.

I don’t remember that part.

Are you pronouncing this word? Remember? Try
to pronounce it with the schwa. Remember, re-re-re,

remember

remember,

I want you to listen to just the last three
words. Remember that part.

Remember that part.

Kind of mumbly, it’s at the end of the thought
group, it’s losing the vocal energy, and when

I’m listening to the word ‘that’, which would
have a Stop T in most cases because it’s followed

by the P here, I actually think I am also
not hearing that. That part, that part, that

part, that part, that part. I think he drops
it. TH, quick AA vowel, and then right into

the P. That part, that part, that part, that
part.

The ending T, he’s also not really pronouncing
that too clearly. I would still write that

as a Stop T, I don’t think it’s dropped, that
would sound like par– and I don’t hear that.

I hear: part, part, and that more abrupt end
is the Stop T. But let’s listen to these last

three words on a loop again and think about
how you have to simplify everything in your

mouth to be able to say this this quickly
and this unclearly. It’s a little bit mumbled.

This is pretty common for how words come out at the end of a thought group.

They’re definitely less clear.

Remember that part.

First job?

First job? First job? Two stressed words.
They’re both a little bit longer. First job?

And pitch goes up at the end because she’s
asking the question. She wants to know what

was his first job. Notice how we’re pronouncing
the T here. This T is dropped because it comes

between two consonants. That’s really common
to do that when we have an ending cluster

like the ST cluster in ‘first’ or ‘just’ or
‘must’. When it’s followed by a word that

begins with a consonant, you’ll hear that
T dropped. That helps to link the two words

together more smoothly. So right from the
S into the J sound. First job. Also note we

have the letter O here. I know my students
see that and they want to do some lip rounding.

No lip rounding in this sound. It’s the AH
as in father vowel. It is not job, actually,

this reminds me of Tom who’s a Rachel’s English
teacher. His name is the same, single syllable

has the letter O. It makes the AH as in father
vowel. And even so, almost all of his students

say something like: Tom, Tom, instead of Tom,
ah-ah, with no lip rounding, even though he

reminds them it’s not an OH sound, it’s the
AH vowel.

We see the letter O, we have such a strong
association. But in English, one of the challenges

is to break your association between what
you see on the page, and the actual natural

American pronunciation. Because as you can
see, we change things quite a bit.

We drop sounds, vowels are not what we think they
are, so the vowel in ‘job’ and in the word

‘Tom’ is the AH as in father vowel. Oh–

First job?

First job?

First job?
Soldier.

Soldier. Soldier. Two-syllable word, first
syllable stress, soldier.

DI here is pronounced as a J sound, which we would write in IPA: dj– soldier, soldier.

Soldier. Soldier. Soldier.

And the L here, this is the break of the syllable.
Soldier. So the L comes after the vowel. That

makes it a Dark L. He made it without lifting
his tongue tip. I make it without lifting

my tongue tip. Soldier. Soldier. I’m not lifting
my tongue tip at all there, I’m using the

back of my tongue for a more dark sound, for
the Dark L. I challenge you to do the same

thing. Do not lift your tongue tip. An L is
a Dark L when it comes after the vowel or

diphthong in a syllable. Soldier.

Soldier. Soldier. Soldier.

Straight out of high school.

Five-word thought group, the word ‘straight’
and ‘high’, most stressed. School also has

some length, but it’s at the end of the thought
group, the pitch isn’t as high. Straight out

of high school. Straight out of high school.

Straight out of high school.

Straight out of high school.

Straight out of high school.

We have an STR beginning cluster, strai–
strai– the T can come out as a CH there.

Stch– strai– strai– straight out of– straight
out of–

Just make sure you make it light. Don’t put
too much ch– air in it. Strai– strai–

then these four letters, a-I-g-h, all make the
AY diphthong.

Straight out of high school.

All of the words in this thought group are
really smoothly connected. We have a couple

Flap T’s linking words together, like connecting
‘straight out’. Straight out, straight out,

dadadada.

Straight out ah– straight out ah–
Another Flap T connecting here.Straight outta–

The word ‘of’ reduced, it’s just the schwa.
Straight outta– straight outta– straight

outta– straight outta– dadadadada– two
flaps linking those words.

Straight out of high school.

Straight out of high school.

Straight out of high school.

High school. High school. High school.

And again, we have a Dark L. I guarantee you
he is not lifting his tongue tip. Don’t lift

your tongue tip as you practice this.

High school.

Left the ranks a full bird colonel.

So, the word ‘left’ stressed, ‘ranks’ also
sort of stressed, but also not totally clear.

We’ll talk about that in a second. Then the
last three words, even more clear, even longer.

Full bird colonel.

Left the ranks a full bird colonel.

Left the ranks a full bird colonel.

Left the ranks a full bird colonel.

So the rhythm pattern of these first four
words, I would say, is still: da-da-da-da.

Stressed, unstressed, stressed, unstressed.
Even though ‘left’ and ‘ranks’ are said more

quickly, it really slows down then on ‘full
bird colonel’. He’s really stressing all three

of those words.

Left the ranks a full bird colonel.

Left the ranks a full bird colonel.

Left the ranks a full bird colonel.

Left the ranks, left the ranks. T is dropped,
it comes between two other consonants.

Left the, left the. So a quick F goes right into
the voiced TH, which doesn’t come through

the teeth here, because it’s beginning an
unstressed word. Left the, the, the, the–

I make that sound by just pressing my tongue
on the backs of the teeth. It’s not at the

roof of the mouth, that would make it sound
like a d, but the tongue tip doesn’t come

through the teeth either. Left the, left the,
left the ranks. Left the ranks a–

Left the ranks–

The N here is the NG sound because it’s followed
by the letter k. Ranks, ranks, ranks. And

I really feel like it’s very subtle here.
He says this word quickly, a little unclearly.

It almost sounds like ‘rakes’ without the
ng to me.

Left the ranks– left the ranks– left the
ranks a full bird colonel.

Full– we have a Dark L. Don’t lift your tongue
tip. Try it: full, full, full bird. ‘bird’

has the UR vowel, and that’s overtaken by
the R so you don’t actually need to try to

make a vowel at all. Make the B sound, the
R sound, the D sound. Bird, bird.

Now the word ‘colonel’. Okay, that’s obviously…

This is one of the weirdest words in American English as far as letters and sounds.

Full bird colonel. Full bird colonel. Full
bird colonel.

We have the K sound, which we get from the
letter C, then we have the same sound combination

as in ‘bird’, the ur vowel and the R consonant.
Where’s the R, exactly? So where’s the O?

Don’t know. Where’s this O? Don’t know. It’s
just very strange. I don’t know how this word

evolved, it’d be interesting to look into
that. Colonel. Two-syllable word, first syllable

stress, K sound, R sound: ker– ker–, and
then a very quick: nl, nl, nl. And Dark L

sound at the end. Colonel.

Colonel.

Then?

Then?

Voice goes up in pitch, she’s asking a question,

it’s not a statement. She’s saying what’s
next? Then?

Then?

Spy.

Spy. So his voice has a little bit of popcorn
quality. There’s not a full engagement of

the air. Quick up-down shape of a stressed
syllable. That is a statement. It comes down.

Spy.

Spy.

Where?

Where?

Now this one also comes down and she also

has a popcorn quality of her voice. Uhhhh–
where? Where? Instead of: where? Where?

Which has more volume, more air.

Where?

Now, why does this one go down in pitch, where
the other question statement went up in pitch?

That’s a great question. The general rule
is for the most part, if it’s a yes/no question,

it goes up in pitch, if not, it goes down
in pitch. But there are always exceptions

when she said ‘then?’ going up here, that
was not a yes/no question, but going up made

us know it was a question. Here, the pitch
of ‘where’ it goes down. We still know it’s

a question.

Where?

The word ‘where’ as a statement wouldn’t exist,
wouldn’t really make sense. And I’m trying

to think: would I ever make the intonation
of ‘where’ go up? And I would. I would if

someone had told me where something was, and
I didn’t hear them, and I needed them to say

it again, then I would say: where? But this
is her first time asking the question: where?

She’s making it a statement.

Where?

It was the cold war, we were everywhere.

Okay, this is interesting. We have: it was
the cold war. It was the cold war. Stress

on ‘cold’. It was the– those three words,
hmm, how are they pronounced?

It was the cold war–

I’m hearing a Z sound, I’m hearing a schwa.
It was the cold war– it was the cold war–

Now, I know that the phrase grammatically
would be ‘it was the cold war.’ but he says

those three words really quickly, just combines
them into two sounds. It was the cold war–

it was the cold war–

It was the cold war–

We were everywhere.

Then the words: we were everywhere. We were–
pitch goes up, energy goes up. We were eh–

we have the peak on the EH vowel, everywhere.
And then the pitch comes down. We were everywhere.

We were everywhere. All connected, smoothly
together.

We were everywhere.

We were everywhere.

We were everywhere.
Now?

Now? Now? Again, her pitch goes up, showing
it’s a question. Now, this is a word that

we could make as a statement. Now? Like if
someone said: hey rachel! When are you leaving?

Now. So by making the intonation go up, now?
It’s inviting that question by a conversation.

Now?

Now? Now? Now?

Been riding a desk for the past six years,

trying to figure out where future enemies
are coming from.

Then he has a really long thought group. Actually,
let’s add the end of this thought group here

to this slide. So we have lots of words that
are a little bit longer, a little bit clearer.

Been riding a desk for the past six years–

Been riding a desk for the past six years–

Been riding a desk for the past six years–

Been riding a desk for the past six years,

trying to figure out where our future enemies are coming from.

Trying to figure out where our future enemies
are coming from.

Future. A little bit of length on ‘enemies
co–’, but we have some reductions,

what are you noticing? First let’s look at the first word.

Been riding,

EE is pronounced as the letter IH, that’s
actually not a reduction, but it’s just the

pronunciation, but it’s said very quickly.

Been, been, been, been. Been riding, been
riding–

Been riding, been riding, been riding a desk–

Riding a desk– riding a– riding a–

NG sound is changed to just an N sound.

Ridin a–

And that links right into the schwa. Ridin a– ridin a–

Been riding a,

Now, we have ‘desk for the’.

I want you to listen to those three words, and listen especially for the K.

Been riding a desk for the–

Desk for the– desk for the– desk for the–
K is dropped.

Comes between two consonant sounds,

we sometimes do that when we’re linking things together. Desk for the–

Been riding a desk for the–

Desk for the– desk for the–

‘for the’, both said really quickly, we have
a for reduction, the word ‘the’,

tongue tip does not need to come through the teeth for that TH, you can just touch it at the back

of the teeth, the back of the front teeth.
For the, for the, for the, for the.

How fast can you say that? For the, for the, for the. Desk for the, desk for the.

Desk for the– desk for the– desk for the
past six years.

Now look, let’s look ahead.

We have STS, a cluster, the T comes between two other constant sounds.

Do you think it’s dropped? I think
it is. Let’s hear.

The past six years. The past six years. The
past six years.

Past six years. Past six years. Past six years.

Okay, yup. It is dropped. Past six.

Those two words connected with the single S and actually, I’m gonna write a little bit of

length on that word too. Past six years, past
six years.

I think they all have a little bit of length to them.

The past six years. The past six years. The
past six years, trying to figure out where

future enemies are coming from.

Trying to figure out– okay, that has… That’s
not how it’s pronounced.

The TR, I am hearing a CHR, trying, trying, that’s really common.

Now the ING, again, he’s dropping the G sound.

He’s making that an N sound. Tryin, tryin,
tryin. The word ‘to’ this word is reduced

to just the schwa. We don’t usually drop the
beginning sound, we do make that a Flap T

sometimes. But I have noticed we do sometimes
drop that altogether when the sound before

is an N, and that’s what’s happening here.
Tryna– tryna– tryna–

Trying to figure out,

Trying to figure out, trying to figure out,
trying to figure out. Figure out. Figure out.

Figure out. Figure out.

Also said pretty quickly, out, we have a Stop
T here, figure out, figure out, figure out.

Because the next word begins with a consonant,
the W sound.

Trying to figure out,

where our future enemies–

WH word but he makes just a clean W sound.
There’s no wh, wh, wh, where in front, it’s

just: where, where. The word ‘our’ pretty
unclear. I would probably write that schwa R,

it’s reduced. Where our, where our, where
our, where our.

Where our future enemies– where our future
enemies– where our future enemies–

You know, I would normally write this schwa
R, but I actually almost think I’m just hearing

it like a schwa. Where our– where our future–
where our future enemies are–

That’s not too common, but I do think that’s
what he’s doing here. Where our future– where

our future enemies are–

He’s just speaking so quickly. This particular
word is said so quickly. Now, when it’s all

linked together, I totally get it. It would
sound weird to pronounce ‘our’ that way if

it wasn’t linked in as part of the sentence.

Where our future enemies–

This word ‘our’ and this word ‘are’, both
often reduced to something that sounds pretty

much the same, schwa R. Of course, over here,
I said the R was dropped but here, I do hear it.

Enemies are– enemies are– enemies are–
ending Z sound linking right into the next sound.

Zar, zar– enemies are–

Enemies are–

coming
from–

Are coming from– are coming from– are coming
from– so he has three ING verbs here, and

for each one of them, he’s changed the NG
sound into an end N sound.

I do tell my students not to do this all the time.

It just doesn’t sound quite right, mixed in with other things

that students tend to do. There will be some
native speakers that do it all the time, that

will definitely sound like an accent, a regional
accent in the us, and that’s fine. Especially,

you know, if you live there, you might want
to pick that up. Although people in the US

move around so much, I can’t say that, you
know, everyone in a particular region speaks

that way. A lot of people would speak with
a more standard accent. And that’s what I teach.

So I just want to talk about that here, he’s
done it three times, a student watching this

might think: oh, it’s… We should be doing
this all the time. I wouldn’t say that.

The last word ‘from’, not reduced. Sometimes,
we reduce this word to: from, from, but the

vowel is not reduced. It is the UH as in butter
vowel. We generally don’t reduce the last

word in a sentence, or a thought group.

Coming from,

Never occurred to me they would be coming from above.

So let’s talk about stress. Never occurred
to me they would be coming from above.

And the most stress on that last word because this is what is unusual.

The enemies are coming from above.

Never occurred to me they would be coming
from above.

Never occurred to me they would be coming
from above.

Never occurred to me they would be coming
from above.

Also, grammatically, we would have the word
‘it’ here. The word ‘it’ is implied. It never

occurred to me. But he doesn’t say that, he
just says: never occurred to me–

Never occurred to me–

Never occurred to me–

Never occurred to me–

Never occurred to me–

So in the stressed syllable of occur, we have that R vowel again.

Occur– ur– occured–

So you don’t need to try to make a vowel there.

It’s really the R sound. Occurred. Occurred.

Occurred.

A little bit of stress on the first syllable
of ne– never uh– then the R links into the

schwa. Never uh, never uh, never occurred–

Never occurred–

to me–

Never occurred to me– occurred to me– so
the ED ending here is a little light D sound,

not released. Then he makes the word ‘to’
with a true T, and the vowel is reduced to

the schwa. Occurred to– occurred to– do
you hear that D sound in my vocal cords before

I make the T? Occurred to– occurred to me–
occurred to me–

Occurred to me– occurred to me– occurred
to me

they would be coming from above.

So we have the stressed syllable: occurred–
then we have ‘to me they would be’, all of

these words before the next stressed word.

To me they would be coming–

To me they would be coming–

To me they would be coming–

To me they would be, to me they would be,

to me they would be, to me they would be.

A little bit flatter in pitch but you don’t
have much of that up-down shape.

To me they would be, to me they would be, to me they would be. Now, I hope you’re noticing the

L in ‘would’ is always silent. To me they
would be, to me they would be.

A very light D sound in the vocal cords here,
again, not released. That would be: they would be.

They would be. They would be.

We don’t hear that. They would be, they would
be, they would be. That’s what we hear.

They would be. Little D sound, the vocal cords
are vibrating, that’s a voiced sound, but

it’s not released, I go right into the B sound.

To me they would be–

coming from above.

Coming from above.
We have interesting stress here. He’s playing

with it a little bit because of the surprise
of the enemies coming from above, from outer space.

Coming from above. Da-da-da-da-da.
Really stressing that last syllable.

Now, here we have an ING word, he does pronounce that as an ING word. He makes the NG sound

instead of an N sound. Coming, coming, coming,
coming, coming from, coming from.

Now, here I probably would write this as the
from reduction with a schwa instead of the

UH as in butter vowel. Coming from, coming
from above. Coming from above.

Coming from above.

The last thing I want to talk about is he
does do a little lift here: from above.

When I was practicing it one time, I did it with the link: from a, from a, from a, from above,

from above. But no, it’s not how he does it.
He says: from above, from above, from– little

break, above. Putting that little break there
makes that word even more stressed. If we

linked it into the word before, it would sound
a little bit more conversational. But by putting

a little lift there, a little break in the
sound, it brings more stress to that word.

Wow. The enemies are coming from above.

Coming from above.

Let’s listen to this whole conversation one
more time

You want to get personal.

Where were you born?

Huntsville, Alabama. But technically, I don’t
remember that part.

First job?
Soldier. Straight out of high school.

Left the ranks a full bird colonel.
Then?

Spy.
Where?

It was the cold war, we were everywhere.
Now?

Been riding a desk for the past six years,
trying to figure out where future enemies

are coming from. Never occurred to me they
would be coming from above.

We’re going to be doing a lot more of this
kind of analysis together. What movie scenes

would you like to see analyzed like this?
Let me know in the comments! And if you want

to see all my Ben Franklin videos, click here!

You’ll also find the link in the video description.

That’s it and thanks so much for using Rachel’s English.

在美国,夏天适合沙滩、阳光和
大片。 今年夏天,我们将使用

这些电影来学习英语并学习
如何听起来像美国人。

今年夏天的每个视频都将是一个学习英语的电影视频。

我们将从夏季最热门的电影以及过去几年最喜欢的电影中提取场景。

通过学习一点点英语对话,我们就能发现令人惊奇的东西。

我们将学习如何理解电影,

是什么让美国人听起来像美国人,
当然还有

在我们研究的场景中出现的任何有趣的词汇短语动词或习语

我把这种练习称为本富兰克林练习。

首先,我们将观看
现场。 然后我们将对

我们一起听到的内容进行深入分析。 这
将非常有趣! 一定要告诉你的朋友,

并宣传整个夏天,
每个星期二,我们都会

在 Rachel’s English 看电影学习英语。

如果您是我频道的新手,请点击订阅
,不要忘记通知按钮。

让我们开始吧。 首先,场景。

你想变得个性化。

你在哪里出世?

阿拉巴马州亨茨维尔。 但从技术上讲,我不
记得那部分了。

第一份工作?
士兵。 直接从高中毕业。

离开了一个完整的鸟上校。
然后呢?

间谍。
在哪里?

那是冷战,我们无处不在。
现在?

在过去的六年里一直坐在办公桌前,
试图弄清楚未来的

敌人来自哪里。 我从来没有想过他们
会从上面来。

现在分析。

你想变得个性化。

我喜欢这句话,因为

重读音节和非重读音节和单词之间有如此大的对比。 他一开始真的很强调

“你”这个词。

你想变得个性化。

你想变得个性化。

你想变得个性化。

你想变得个性化。 而在
“per”的重读音节中,第一个音节也是

重读的,但是“want to get”这三个词
的音调都低了很多,没有那么清晰,

比“you”更平,上下形态,更高
重读单词“you”的音高。

你想变得个性化。

你想变得个性化。

你想变得个性化。

只听“想得到”。

想要得到——

想要得到——想要得到——想要得到——
比“你”清楚得多。 现在听

“you”这个词和“want to get”在一起,
强调然后不强调。

你想得到——重读音节和非重读音节

的质量有很大的不同
。 我们有

一个减少。 “想要”变成了“想要”。

想要得到——想要得到——想要得到——

而“得到”这个词有一个停止T,因为
下一个词以辅音开头。

得到,得到,得到,得到,想要得到,想要得到。

想要得到——
想要得到——想要变得个性化。

大家好! 我想在这里告诉你 Skillshare 再次赞助这个视频。

现在,我知道你在网上做了很多学习,我也是!

Skillshare 是一个可以继续学习的好地方。

您可能已经注意到大约一个月前,我制作了一个视频,称为我的早晨例行公事。

在那个视频中,当我制作它时,我发现视频博客实际上有点难。

这绝对是它自己的独立技能。

我发现 Skillshare 有一个很棒的 YouTuber 的视频博客课程,我想参加。

来到 Skillshare 并搜索您感兴趣的任何内容。

您会找到英语课程,这样您就可以学习词汇

和在谈论您热衷的主题时使用的短语。

这是学习的两倍!

如果您注册,请在下面的评论中告诉我您最终选择了哪门课程,

我非常有兴趣了解更多关于你们的信息!

按照此链接或视频说明中的链接获取您自己的代码,即可免费获得 2 个月!

好,我们回到分析。

你想变得个性化。

然后是非重读音节,son–,al–,
都说得很快,它们

都有 schwa,在这两种情况下,它们
后面都跟着一个音节辅音,这

意味着辅音接管了 schwa。 我们不
发出单独的元音。 所以我们

从 S 直接进入 N。 Sn, sn, sn– person, person。
然后从 N 到 L,不发

任何元音。 纳尔,纳尔,纳尔,纳尔。

现在,这是一个暗 L,它确实具有类似元音的品质。

你想变得个性化。

你想变得个性化。

你想变得个性化。

你想变得个性化。

哇! 不同的日子,不同的服装,重要的
公告。 你知道吗,通过这个

视频,我制作了一个免费的音频课程,你
可以下载? 事实上,我正在为

我今年夏天制作的每一个 youtube 视频都这样做
,所有 11 个通过电影学习英语的

视频。 因此,请点击此链接,或
在视频说明中找到该链接,以获取

免费下载的音频课程。 在这里
,您将训练

您在此视频中学到的有关发音的所有内容
。 回到课程。

现在,这是美国人在这种情况下如何制作 L 的
。 它是一个黑暗的 L,它位于一个

思想组的末尾,它与任何东西都没有联系。
我们在不抬起舌尖的情况下做到这一点。

你也可以这样吗? 我们用
舌头的后部制作 Dark L。 呃,呃。

舌头后部下压一点,
呃,呃,而舌尖保持向前。

我发现我的大多数学生都
接受过举起舌尖的大量训练,这是

一个很难改掉的习惯。 我
想挑战你这样做。 Per-so-nal-

uhl- 你的舌头为 N 抬起,
然后放回原位,nal- uhl- 并用

舌头的后部为 Dark L. Personal 发出黑暗的声音

你在哪里出世?

她在这里说话很快,没有太多的情绪,
很直白。 你在哪里出世?

where 和born 都是重读的词。

你在哪里出世?

你在哪里出世?

你在哪里出世?

你在哪里出世?
他们都有上下的形状,如果你 -

另一方面,更平坦,
更快。 是你,是你,是你。

单词“born”this 将与
AW as in law 元音一起书写,然后是 R。当这

两个声音在同一个音节中出现时,
就像这里一样,AW as in law 元音不纯。

这不是AW,而是哦。 我的嘴唇更圆了
,舌头向后拉了一点,出生了,

出生了。 你在哪里出世?

你在哪里出世?

你在哪里出世?

你在哪里出世?

阿拉巴马州亨茨维尔,但从技术上讲,我不记得那部分了。

所以这是一个较长的思想群体。 他说:
阿拉巴马州亨茨维尔,但从技术上讲,我不

记得那部分了。 没有刹车。 如果没有
刹车,那就意味着它是一个思想群体。

所以我在这里和阿拉巴马州亨茨维尔一起写过,
在这张幻灯片上,在下一张幻灯片上,

是思想组的后半部分,但他
实际上并没有在那里休息。

阿拉巴马州亨茨维尔,但从技术上讲,我不
记得那部分了。

阿拉巴马州亨茨维尔,但从技术上讲,我不
记得那部分了。

阿拉巴马州亨茨维尔,但从技术上讲,我不
记得那部分了。

这些多音节词的重音,
我们有huntsville,第一音节重音,

Alabama,所以重音最多的音节是
bam–,第一级有一点次

重音,所以我把主重音
标记放在那里,次要 那里有压力标记。

其他两个 A 是 schwas。 实际上,就
在几周前,我在频道上制作了一个视频

,介绍了如何检查
50 个州及其首都的发音,我们谈到

了这个词中的四个 A。 单击此处或
在视频说明中查看

有关 50 个州发音的视频

亨茨维尔,阿拉巴马州

亨茨维尔,阿拉巴马州

亨茨维尔,阿拉巴马州,但从技术上讲,我不
记得那部分了。

但从技术上讲,我不记得那部分了。
我们的重读音节,很清楚,但是技术性的——

但从技术上讲,我不记得那部分了。
那些有更高的音高,他们有上下的

形状,曲线。 其余的稍微
平坦一些。 它要么通向高峰,

要么远离高峰。

但是技术——但是,但是——

但是从技术上讲,我不记得那部分了。

但从技术上讲,我不记得那部分了。

但从技术上讲,我不记得那部分了。

现在我们有一个结尾 T 和一个开头 T。它们
将组合成一个单一的声音,一个

真正的 T,但在技术上,但在技术上。

但技术上,但技术上,但技术上。

他把这个词发音为三个音节,
第一个音节重音,tech——这里的 ch

发出硬 K 音。 Tech-nic——这里的 C
发出硬 K 音。 Tech-nic-lly——然后

他根本没有发音,只是一个
LY 结尾。 Tech-nic-lly - 从技术上讲。

从技术上讲。

从技术上讲,我不
记得那部分了。

所有这些词都非常
顺利地联系在一起。 从技术上讲,我不重新-

好吧,N 撇号 T 收缩发生了什么
? 我们有很多不同的

发音方式。 在这种特殊
情况下,我想我实际上听到了整个

事情的下降。 多记得——多,多。 所以
我们有 D 辅音,哦双元音,

然后我听到它直接连接到下一个
声音,即 R。

我不记得那部分了。

我不记得那部分了。

我不记得那部分了。

现在,它听起来不像“do”,因为“do”
有不同的发音。 它有D辅音

和oo元音。 所以我们有
这个哦双元音的事实,这就是我们知道它

是负面的。 呵呵——不记得了。 不
记得了。 但实际上,我绝对

听不到 T。有一秒钟,我
循环听了它,我在问自己:我

听到轻快的 N 吗? 我不认为我真的这样做。
我认为它只是下降了。 不记得了。

不记得了。 不记得了。 不记得了。
哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦哦 只是 OH 双元音

直接进入 R。这不是很疯狂吗? 我们可以在
没有 N 撇号 T 的情况下发音这种收缩

,没有使它成为负数的部分
。 但由于 OH 双元音,我仍然听到这个词

我不记得那部分了。

我不记得那部分了。

我不记得那部分了。

你在发这个词吗? 记住? 尝试
用 schwa 发音。 记住,重新重新,

记住,

记住,

我要你只听最后
三个字。 记住那部分。

记住那部分。

有点含糊,它在思想组的末尾
,它正在失去声音能量,当

我听到“那个”这个词时,
在大多数情况下它会有一个停止 T,因为它后面

是 P,我 实际上认为我也
没有听到。 那部分,那部分,那

部分,那部分,那部分。 我认为他放弃了
它。 TH,快速AA元音,然后直接

进入P。那个部分,那个部分,那个部分,那个
部分。

结尾T,他也不
是很清楚地发音。 我仍然会把它

写成一个 Stop T,我不认为它被丢弃了,
这听起来像是标准 - 我没有听到。

我听到:部分,部分,更突然的结尾
是停止 T。但是让我们再次循环听这最后

三个单词,并考虑
如何简化嘴里的所有内容

才能快速说出这句话
这不清楚。 它有点喃喃自语。

这对于思想组结束时单词的出现方式很常见。

他们肯定不太清楚。

记住那部分。

第一份工作?

第一份工作? 第一份工作? 两个重音词。
他们俩都长了一点。 第一份工作?

音调在最后上升,因为她在
问这个问题。 她想

知道他的第一份工作是什么。 注意我们在
这里如何发音 T。 这个 T 被删除是因为它

位于两个辅音之间。
当我们

在“first”或“just”或“must”中有一个像 ST 集群这样的结束集群时,这样做真的很常见
。 当它后面

跟着一个以辅音开头的单词时,你会听到
T 下降了。 这有助于将这两个词

更顺畅地连接在一起。 于是就从
S音变成了J音。 第一份工作。 另请注意,我们

这里有字母 O。 我知道我的学生
看到了这一点,他们想做一些圆润的嘴唇。

这个声音没有圆唇。 它
是父元音中的 AH。 这不是工作,实际上,

这让我想起了雷切尔的英语
老师汤姆。 他的名字是一样的,单音节

有字母O。它使AH在父亲
元音中。 即便如此,几乎所有他的学生都会

说这样的话:Tom, Tom,而不是 Tom,
ah-ah,没有圆唇,尽管他

提醒他们这不是 OH 音,而是
AH 元音。

我们看到字母O,我们就有这么强的
联想。 但是在英语中,挑战之一

是打破
您在页面上看到的内容与实际自然的

美国发音之间的关联。 因为正如你所
看到的,我们改变了很多事情。

我们放弃声音,元音不是我们认为
的那样,所以“工作”和

“汤姆”这个词中的元音是父元音中的 AH。 哦——

第一份工作?

第一份工作?

第一份工作?
士兵。

士兵。 士兵。 双音节词,第一
音节重音,士兵。

这里的 DI 发 J 音,我们用国际音标写成:dj– 士兵,士兵。

士兵。 士兵。 士兵。

而这里的L,这是音节的中断。
士兵。 所以 L 出现在元音之后。 这

使它成为Dark L。他没有抬起舌尖就做到
了。 我做到了没有抬起

我的舌尖。 士兵。 士兵。 我根本没有
在那儿抬起我的舌尖,我用

我的舌头后部发出更黑暗的声音,
因为 Dark L。我挑战你做同样的

事情。 不要抬起你的舌尖。 当一个 L
出现在音节中的元音或双元音之后时,它就是暗

L。 士兵。

士兵。 士兵。 士兵。

直接从高中毕业。

五个词的思想组,“直”
和“高”两个词,重音最大。 学校也有

一些长度,但它在思想组的末尾
,音高没有那么高。 直接

从高中毕业。 直接从高中毕业。

直接从高中毕业。

直接从高中毕业。

直接从高中毕业。

我们有一个 STR 起始簇,strai–
strai– T 可以作为 CH 出现。

Stch–strai–strai–直接出来–直接
出来–

只要确保你让它变轻。 不要
在里面放太多的ch-air。 Strai——strai——

然后这四个字母,a-I-g-h,都构成了
AY 双元音。

直接从高中毕业。

这个思想组中的所有单词都
非常流畅地连接起来。 我们有几个

Flap T 的连接词,比如连接
“直接”。 直出,直出,

达达达。

直出啊–直出啊– 另一个 Flap T 连接在这里。直出–

‘of’ 这个词减少了,它只是 schwa。
直出-直出-直

出-直出-达达达达-
连接这些词的两个襟翼。

直接从高中毕业。

直接从高中毕业。

直接从高中毕业。

中学。 中学。 中学。

再说一次,我们有一个黑暗的 L。我向你保证
他没有抬起他的舌尖。

练习时不要抬起舌尖。

中学。

留下了一个完整的鸟上校。

所以,“left”这个词强调,“ranks”也
有点强调,但也不完全清楚。

我们稍后再谈。 然后
最后三个字,更清晰,更长。

全鸟上校。

留下了一个完整的鸟上校。

留下了一个完整的鸟上校。

留下了一个完整的鸟上校。

所以这前四个词的节奏模式
,我想说,仍然是:da-da-da-da。

有压力的,没有压力的,有压力的,没有压力的。
尽管“左”和“军衔”说得

更快,但它确实比“全
鸟上校”慢。 他真的在强调这

三个词。

留下了一个完整的鸟上校。

留下了一个完整的鸟上校。

留下了一个完整的鸟上校。

离开队伍,离开队伍。 T 被删除,
它位于其他两个辅音之间。

离开了,离开了。 所以一个快速的 F 直接
进入浊音 TH,这里不是

从牙齿开始的,因为它开始一个不
重读的单词。 离开那个,那个,那个,那个——

我只是把我的舌头
按在牙齿后面来发出那个声音。 它不在

口腔顶部,这会使它听起来
像一个d,但舌尖也不会

从牙齿中伸出。 离开了,离开了,
离开了行列。

左列 a– 左列

– 这里的 N 是 NG 音,因为它后面
跟着字母 k。 排位,排位,排位。

我真的觉得这里很微妙。
他说的很快,有点不清楚。 对我来说,

这几乎听起来像是没有 ng 的“耙子”

离开队伍——离开队伍——留下
一个完整的鸟上校。

满——我们有一个黑暗的 L。不要抬起你的
舌尖。 试试看:满的,满的,满的鸟。 ‘bird’

有 UR 元音,它被 R 取代,
所以你实际上根本不需要尝试

发出元音。 发B音、
R音、D音。 鸟,鸟。

现在是“上校”这个词。 好吧,那很明显……

就字母和发音而言,这是美式英语中最奇怪的词之一。

全鸟上校。 全鸟上校。 全
鸟上校。

我们有从字母 C 得到的 K 音
,然后我们有与

“bird”中相同的音组合,即 ur 元音和 R 辅音。
R到底在哪里? 那么O在哪里?

不知道。 这是哪里啊? 不知道。 这
很奇怪。 我不知道这个词

是如何演变的,研究一下会很有趣
。 上校。 双音节词,第一个音节重读

,K音,R音:ker– ker–,
然后是一个很快的:nl,nl,nl。 最后是Dark L

声音。 上校。

上校。

然后?

然后?

声音提高了,她在问一个问题,

这不是一个陈述。 她说
接下来怎么办? 然后?

然后?

间谍。

间谍。 所以他的声音有点爆米花的味道
。 空气没有完全

接触。 重读音节的快速上下形状
。 那是一个声明。 它下来了。

间谍。

间谍。

在哪里?

在哪里?

现在这个也下来

了,她的声音也有爆米花的味道。 呃——
在哪里? 在哪里? 而不是:在哪里? 在哪里?

体积更大,空气更多。

在哪里?

现在,为什么这个问题在音调上下降,
而另一个问题陈述在音调上上升?

这是一个很好的问题。 一般
规则在很大程度上是,如果它是一个是/否的问题,

它的音调上升,如果不是,它
的音调下降。

但当她说“那么?”时,总是有例外。 上去,
这不是一个是/否的问题,但上去让

我们知道这是一个问题。 在这里,
“哪里”的音调下降。 我们仍然知道这是

一个问题。

在哪里?

“在哪里”这个词作为陈述是不存在的,
也没有真正的意义。 我在

想:我会不会把
“哪里”的语调调高? 我会的。 如果

有人告诉我某物在哪里,而
我没有听到,我需要他们

再说一遍,我会说:在哪里? 但这
是她第一次问这个问题:在哪里?

她正在发表声明。

在哪里?

那是冷战,我们无处不在。

好吧,这很有趣。 我们有:那
是冷战。 那是冷战。

强调“冷”。 就是——那三个字,
嗯,怎么发音?

那是冷战——

我听到的是 Z 音,我听到的是 schwa。
那是冷战——那是冷战——

现在,我知道这句话在语法上
应该是“那是冷战”。 可他

这三个字说的真快,只是
合成了两个音而已。 那是冷战——

那是冷战——

那是冷战——

我们无处不在。

然后是:我们无处不在。 我们是——
音调上升,能量上升。 我们是 eh——

我们在 EH 元音上的峰值无处不在。
然后音调下降。 我们无处不在。

我们无处不在。 所有连接,顺利
在一起。

我们无处不在。

我们无处不在。

我们无处不在。
现在?

现在? 现在? 再一次,她的音调上升,表明
这是一个问题。 现在,这是一个

我们可以作为陈述的词。 现在? 就像
有人说:嘿,瑞秋! 你什么时候走?

现在。 所以现在通过提高语调?
它通过对话邀请这个问题。

现在?

现在? 现在? 现在?

在过去的六年里一直坐在办公桌前,

试图弄清楚未来的
敌人来自哪里。

然后他有一个很长的思想小组。 实际上,
让我们将这个思想组的结尾添加

到这张幻灯片中。 所以我们有很多单词
更长一点,更清晰一点。

六年

骑桌——六年骑桌——六年

骑桌——

六年骑桌,

想知道我们的未来在哪里 敌人来自。

试图弄清楚我们未来的
敌人来自哪里。

未来。 ‘敌人
合作-‘有点长,但我们有一些减少,

你注意到什么? 首先我们来看第一个词。

一直骑,

EE读成字母IH,
其实不是减法,只是

读音而已,但是说的很快。

曾经,曾经,曾经,曾经。 一直骑,一直
骑–

一直骑,一直骑,一直骑桌子–

骑桌子– 骑a– 骑a–

NG 音变成了N 音。

Ridin a–

这直接连接到 schwa。 Ridin a–ridin a–

一直在骑a,

现在,我们有’办公桌’。

我想让你听听这三个词,特别是听K。

一直骑着桌子为–

桌子为–桌子为–桌子–
K 掉了。

介于两个辅音之间,

我们有时在将事物联系在一起时会这样做。 Desk for the–

一直骑着

Desk for the– Desk for the–

“for the”,两者都说得真快,我们有
个for减法,‘the’字,

舌尖不需要 要通过牙齿来获得那个 TH,你可以

在牙齿的后部,前牙的后部触摸它。
为,为,为,为。

你能说多快? 为,为,为。 办公桌为,办公桌为。 过去六年的

办公桌 - 办公桌 - 办公桌

现在看,让我们向前看。

我们有 STS,一个簇,T 位于另外两个恒定声音之间。

你觉得它掉了吗?
我觉得是这样的。 让我们听听。

过去的六年。 过去的六年。
过去的六年。

过去六年。 过去六年。 过去六年。

好的,是的。 它被丢弃。 六点过去。

这两个词与单个 S 相连,实际上,我

也会在那个词上写一点长度。 过去六年,过去
六年。

我认为他们都有一点长度。

过去的六年。 过去的六年。
过去六年,试图弄清楚

未来的敌人从何而来。

试图弄清楚 - 好吧,那有……这
不是它的发音方式。

TR,我正在听到 CHR,尝试,尝试,这真的很常见。

现在是 ING,又一次,他放弃了 G 音。

他正在发出N的声音。 试,试,
试。 ‘to’ 这个词被简化

为 schwa。 我们通常不会放弃
开始的声音,我们有时会做一个 Flap

T。 但我注意到
,当前面的声音是 N 时,我们有时会完全放弃它

,这就是这里发生的事情。
Tryna——tryna——tryna——

试图弄清楚,

试图弄清楚,试图弄清楚,
试图弄清楚。 弄清楚。 弄清楚。

弄清楚。 弄清楚。

还说的挺快的,out,我们这里有个Stop
T,搞清楚,搞清楚,搞清楚。

因为下一个单词以辅音开头,
即 W 音。

试图弄清楚

,我们未来的敌人在哪里

——WH字,但他只是发出干净的W音。
前面没有wh,wh,wh,where,

只是:where,where。 “我们的”这个词很
不清楚。 我可能会写那个 schwa R,

它减少了。 我们在哪里,我们在哪里,我们在哪里,
我们在哪里。

我们未来的敌人在哪里——我们未来的敌人在哪里——我们未来的
敌人在哪里——

你知道,我通常会写这个 schwa
R,但实际上我几乎认为我只是

像 schwa 一样听到它。 我们
在哪里——我们的未来在哪里——我们未来的敌人在哪里——

这并不常见,但我确实认为这
就是他在这里所做的。

我们的未来在哪里——我们未来的敌人在哪里——

他说得太快了。 这个
词说得太快了。 现在,当这一切都

联系在一起时,我完全明白了。
如果它没有作为句子的一部分链接,那么以这种方式发音“我们的”听起来会很奇怪

我们未来的敌人在哪里——

“我们的”这个词和“是”这个词,
通常都被简化为听起来

几乎相同的东西,schwa R。当然,在这里,
我说 R 被删除了,但在这里,我做到了 听到。

敌人是 - 敌人是 - 敌人是 -
结束 Z 声音直接连接到下一个声音。

Zar,zar——敌人是——

敌人

是——来自——来自——来自——来自
——所以他在这里有三个 ING 动词,

对于每个动词,他都改变了 NG
音变成结束N音。

我确实告诉我的学生不要一直这样做。

这听起来不太对劲,与

学生倾向于做的其他事情混在一起。 会有一些以
母语为母语的人一直这样做,

这肯定听起来像是一种口音,美国的地方
口音,这很好。 特别是,

你知道,如果你住在那里,你可能
想把它捡起来。 尽管美国的人

四处走动,但我不能说,你
知道,特定地区的每个人都

这样说。 很多人会
用更标准的口音说话。 这就是我教的。

所以我只想在这里说一下,他已经
做了三遍了,一个学生看着这个

可能会想:哦,它是……我们应该一直这样
做。 我不会这么说的。

最后一个词’从’,没有减少。 有时,
我们将这个词简化为:from、from,但

元音并没有减少。 它是黄油
元音中的 UH。 我们通常不会减少

句子或思想组中的最后一个词。

来自,

我从来没有想过他们会从上面来。

所以让我们谈谈压力。 我从来没有
想过他们会从上面来。

最后一句话的压力最大,因为这是不寻常的。

敌人是从上面来的。

我从来没有想过他们会
从上面来。

我从来没有想过他们会
从上面来。

我从来没有想过他们会
从上面来。

此外,从语法上讲,我们
这里会有“它”这个词。 “它”这个词是隐含的。 我从来没有

想过。 但他没有那样说,他
只是说:我从来没有想到——我从来没有想到——我从来没有想到——我从来没有想到——我

从来没有想到——

所以在发生的重读音节中, 我们又看到了那个 R 元音。

Occur– ur–occured–

所以你不需要尝试在那里发出元音。

这真的是R的声音。 发生了。 发生了。

发生了。

对 ne 的第一个
音节稍加强调——从不 uh——然后 R 链接到

schwa。 从来没有,从来没有,

从来没有发生

过——

从来没有发生过——对我来说——从来没有发生在我身上——我想到过——所以
这里的 ED 结尾是一个轻微的 D 音,

没有释放。 然后他
用一个真正的 T 组成“to”这个词,元音被简化

为 schwa。 发生在——发生在——
在我发出 T 之前,你在我的声带中听到了 D 的声音

吗? 发生在——发生在我身上——
发生在我身上

——发生在我身上——发生在我身上——发生
在我身上,

他们会从上面来。

所以我们有重读音节:发生——
然后我们有“to me they would be”,所有

这些词都在下一个重读词之前。

对我来说他们会来——

对我来说他们会来——

对我来说他们会来——

对我来说他们会,对我来说他们会,

对我来说他们会,对我来说他们会。

音高有点平,但你
没有太多的上下形状。

对我来说他们会是,对我来说他们会是,对我来说他们会是。 现在,我希望你注意到

“would”中的 L 总是沉默的。 对我来说他们
会是,对我来说他们会是。

这里声带中的一个非常轻的 D 音,
同样,没有释放。 那将是:他们会的。

他们将是。 他们将是。

我们没有听到。 他们会,他们
会,他们会。 这就是我们听到的。

他们将是。 小D音,声带
在振动,那是浊音,

但没有放开,我直接进入B音。

对我来说,他们会——

来自上面。

从上面来。
我们这里有有趣的压力。

由于
来自外太空的来自天上的敌人的惊喜,他正在玩它一点点。

从上面来。 哒哒哒哒哒。
真的强调最后一个音节。

现在,这里我们有一个 ING 词,他确实将其发音为 ING 词。 他发出 NG 声音

而不是 N 声音。 来了,来了,来了,来了,
来了,来了,来了。

现在,在这里我可能会
用 schwa 而不是黄油元音中的 UH 将其写为 from 减少

。 来自,
来自上面。 从上面来。

从上面来。

我要说的最后一件事是他
确实在这里做了一点提升:从上面。

当我有一次练习它时,我用链接做到了:从a,从a,从a,从上面,

从上面。 但不,这不是他的做法。
他说:从上面,从上面,从——一点点

休息,上面。 把那个小休息放在那里
会使这个词更加强调。 如果我们

之前把它和这个词联系起来,听起来会
更有对话性。 但是通过

稍微提升一下声音,稍微中断
声音,就会给这个词带来更多的压力。

哇。 敌人是从上面来的。

从上面来。

让我们再听一次整个对话

你想变得个性化。

你在哪里出世?

阿拉巴马州亨茨维尔。 但从技术上讲,我不
记得那部分了。

第一份工作?
士兵。 直接从高中毕业。

离开了一个完整的鸟上校。
然后呢?

间谍。
在哪里?

那是冷战,我们无处不在。
现在?

在过去的六年里一直坐在办公桌前,
试图弄清楚未来的

敌人来自哪里。 我从来没有想过他们
会从上面来。

我们将一起进行更多
此类分析。

您希望看到这样分析的哪些电影场景?
在评论中告诉我! 如果你

想看我所有的本富兰克林视频,点击这里!

您还可以在视频说明中找到该链接。

就是这样,非常感谢您使用 Rachel 的英语。