Learn English with President Obama and Mark Zuckerberg at Facebook Town Hall English Subtitles

[Music]

there’s so much Facebook for hosting

this first of all my name is Barack

Obama and I’m the guy who got mark to

wear a jacket and time thank you I’m

very proud of that second time I know

III will say and I hate to tell stories

on mark but the first time we had dinner

together he and he wore this jacket and

tie

I’d say halfway through dinner you know

he’s starting to sweat a little bit it’s

really uncomfortable for him so I helped

him out of his jacket and in fact if

you’d like mark we can take our jackets

off

whoo that’s better isn’t yeah but you’re

a lot better at this stuff than me so

first of all I just want to say thank

you to all of you for taking the time

not only people who are here in the

audience but also folks all over the

country and some around the world who

are watching this townhall the main

reason we want to do this is first of

all because more and more people

especially young people are getting

their information through different

media and obviously what all of you have

built together

is helping to revolutionize how people

get information how they process

information how they’re connecting with

each other and you know historically

part of what makes for a healthy

democracy what is is a good politics is

when you’ve got citizens who are

informed who are engaged and what

Facebook allows us to do is make sure

this isn’t just a one-way conversation

make sure that not only am i speaking to

you but you’re also speaking back and

we’re in a conversation we’re in a

dialogue so I love doing town hall

meetings this format and this company I

think is an ideal means for us to be

able to carry on this conversation and

as Mark mentioned I’ll you know

obviously we’re having a very serious

debate right now about the future

direction of our country we are living

through as tumultuous a time as

certainly I’ve seen in my lifetime

admittedly my lifetimes a lot longer

than most of yours so far this is a

pretty young crowd but we’re seeing

domestically a whole series of

challenges starting with the worst

recession we’ve had since the Great

Depression we’re just now coming out of

it

we’ve got all sorts of disruptions

technological disruptions that are

taking place most of which hold the

promise of making our lives a lot better

but also mean that there are a lot of

adjustments that people are having to

make throughout the economy we still

have a very high unemployment rate that

is starting to come down but there are

awful lot of people who are being

challenged out there day in day out

worrying about whether they can pay the

bills whether they can keep their home

internationally we’re seeing the sorts

of changes that we haven’t seen in a

generation we’ve got certain challenges

like energy and climate change that no

one nation can solve but we’re going to

have to solve together and we don’t yet

have all the institutions that are in

place in order to do that but what makes

me incredibly optimistic and that’s why

being here at Facebook is so exciting

for me is that at every juncture in our

history whenever we’ve faced challenges

like this whether it’s been the shift

from a agricultural age to an industrial

age or whether it was facing the

challenges of the Cold War or trying to

figure out how we make this country more

fair and more inclusive at every

juncture we’ve always been able to adapt

we’ve been able to change and we’ve been

able to get ahead of the curve

and that’s true today as well and you

guys are at the cutting edge of what’s

happening and so I’m gonna be interested

in talking to all of you about why this

debate that we’re having around debt and

our deficits is so important because

it’s going to help determine whether we

can invest in our future and basic

research and innovation and

infrastructure that allow us to compete

in the 21st century and still preserve a

safety net for the most vulnerable among

us but I’m also going to want to share

ideas with you about how we can make our

democracy work better and our polit

sex work better because I don’t think

there’s a problem out there that we

can’t solve if we decide that we’re

gonna solve it together and for that I’m

grateful for the opportunity to speak to

you and instead of just giving a lot of

long speeches I want to make sure that

we’ve got time for as many questions as

possible so Marquette I understand

you’ve got the first one yes let’s start

off so let’s start off with the

conversation about the dead right so I

understand that yesterday morning you

had a town Town Hall in Virginia where

you talked about your framework not only

for resolving the short term budget

issues but the longer term debt and you

spent some time talking about tax reform

and some cost-cutting but you also spent

a lot of time talking about things that

you didn’t think that we could cut in

education infrastructure and clean

energy so my question to kind of start

off is what specifically do you think we

should do and what specifically do you

think we can cut in order to make this

all at a good well let me first of all

mark share with you sort of the nature

of the problem because I think a lot of

folks understand that it’s a problem but

but aren’t sure how it came about in in

2000 at the end of the Clinton

administration we not only had a

balanced budget but we actually had a

surplus and that was in part because of

some tough decisions that had made had

been made by President Clinton

Republican Congress Democratic Congress

and President George HW Bush and what

they had said was let’s make sure that

we’re spending wisely on the things that

matter let’s spend less on things that

don’t matter and let’s make sure that

we’re living within our means that we’re

taking in enough revenue to pay for some

of these basic obligations what happened

then was we went through 10 years where

we forgot what had created the surplus

in the first place so we had a massive

tax cut that wasn’t offset by cuts in

spending we had two wars that weren’t

paid for and this was the first time in

history where we had gone to war and not

asked for additional sacrifice from

American citizens

we had a huge prescription drug plan

that wasn’t paid for and so by the time

I started office we already had about a

trillion dollar annual deficit and we

had massive accumulated debt with

interest payments to boot then you have

this huge recession and so what happens

is less revenues coming in because

company sales are lower individuals are

making less money at the same time and

there’s more need out there so we’re

having to help states and we’re having

to help local governments and that a lot

of what the recovery was about was us

making sure that the economy didn’t tilt

over into a depression by making sure

that teachers weren’t laid off and

firefighters weren’t laid off and there

was still construction for roads and so

forth all of which was expensive I mean

that added about another trillion

dollars worth of debt so now what we’ve

got is a situation not only do we have

this accumulated debt but the baby

boomers are just now starting to retire

and what’s scary is not only that the

baby boomers are retiring at a greater

rate which means they’re making greater

demands on Social Security but primarily

Medicare and Medicaid but health care

costs go up a lot faster than inflation

and older populations use more health

care costs you put that all together and

we have an unsustainable situation so

right now we face a critical time where

we’re gonna have to make some decisions

how do we bring down the debt in the

short term and how do we bring down the

debt over the long term in the short

term Democrats and Republicans now agree

we’ve got to reduce the debt by about

four trillion dollars over the next 10

years and I know that sounds like a lot

of money it is but it’s doable if we do

it in a balanced way what I proposed was

that about two trillion dollars over 10

10 to 12 years is reduction in spending

you know government wastes just like

every other major institution does

and so there are things that we do that

we can afford not to do now there’s some

things that I’d like to do are fun to do

but we just can’t afford them right now

so we’ve made cuts in every area a good

example is Pentagon spending where

Congress oftentimes stuffs weapons

systems in the Pentagon budget that the

Pentagon itself says we don’t need but

special interests and constituencies

help to bloat the Pentagon budget so

we’ve already reduced the Pentagon

budget by about 400 billion dollars we

think we can do about another 400

billion dollars so we’ve got to look at

spending both on non-security issues as

well as defense spending and then what

we’ve said is let’s take another

trillion of that that we raise through a

reforms in the tax system that allows

people like me and frankly you mark for

paying a little more in tax I know

you’re okay with that

[Music]

keep in mind what we’re talking about is

going back to the rates that existed

when Bill Clinton was president now a

lot of you were I’m trying to say this

delicately still in diapers at that time

but but for those of you who were a call

the economy was booming and wealthy

people were getting wealthier there

wasn’t a problem at that time if we go

back to those rates alone that by itself

would do a lot in terms of us reducing

our overall spending and if we can get a

trillion dollars on the revenue side two

trillion and cutting spending we can

still make investments in basic research

we can still invest in something we call

arpa-e which is like DARPA except just

focused on energy so that we can figure

out what are the next breakthrough

technologies that can help us

reduce our reliance on fossil fuels we

can still make investments in education

so we’ve already expanded the Pell Grant

program so that more young people can go

to college we’re investing more in STEM

education of math and science and and

and technology education we can still

make those investments we can still

rebuild our roads and our bridges and

invest in high-speed rail and invest in

in the next generation of broadband and

and wireless and and make sure everybody

has access to the Internet we can do all

those things while still bringing down

the deficit medium term now there’s one

last component of this and I know this

is a long answer but I want to make sure

everybody had had the basic foundations

for it even if we get this four trillion

dollars we do still have a long term

problem with Medicare and Medicaid

because health care costs the inflation

goes up so much faster than wages and

salaries and this is where there’s

another big philosophical debate with

the Republicans because what I’ve said

is the best way for us to change it is

to build on the health reform that we

had last year and start getting a better

bang for our healthcare dollar we waste

so much on health care we spend about

20% more than any other country on earth

and we have worse outcomes because we

end up having multiple tests when we

could just do one test and have it

shared among physicians on Facebook for

example we could focus on the

chronically ill 20% of the patients

account for 80% of the costs so doing

something simple like reimbursing

hospitals and doctors for reducing their

readmissions rate and managing somebody

with a chronic illness like diabetes so

that they’re taking their meds on a

regular basis so that they don’t come to

the emergency room

that saves huge amounts of money so

that’s what health care reform was about

last year or a year and a half ago and

what we

do is build on that and continue to

improve the system what the Republicans

right now are saying is number one they

can’t agree to any increases in taxes

which means we’d have to cut out of that

four trillion all of it would come from

education transportation areas that I

think are critical for our long-term

future so for example they proposed

seventy percent cuts in clean energy

well III don’t know how we free

ourselves in dependence on foreign oil

and anybody who’s paying gas prices

knows that there’s an economic component

to this as well as an environmental

component to it if we’re not investing

in the basic research and technology

that allows solar wind and others to

thrive and develop at the same time what

they’ve said is let’s make Medicare into

a voucher program so that retirees

instead of knowing that they’re always

going to have health care they’re gonna

get a voucher that covers part of the

cost and whatever health care inflation

comes up is all going to be on them and

if the health insurance companies don’t

sell you a policy that covers your

illnesses you’re out of luck I think it

is very important for us to have a basic

social safety net for families with kids

with disabilities for seniors for folks

who are in nursing homes and I think

it’s important for us to invest in our

basic research we can do all those

things but we’re only going to be able

to do it by taking a balanced approach

and that’s what this big debate is about

all all about right now all right all

right so sorry don’t mean to cut off the

applause no no no no no no the very

thorough answer no they were they were

stunned by the length of that answer but

yeah that’s a complicated stuff so the

next question is from someone watching

Facebook live jf teen from Williamsburg

Virginia

writes in and asks the housing crisis

will not go away the mortgage financing

for new homebuyers with low to moderate

income is becoming very difficult

as president what can you do to relax

the policies that are disqualifying

qualified homebuyers from owning their

first home how can you assure the low to

moderate homebuyers that they will have

the opportunity to own their first home

well it’s a good question and I’ll be

honest with you this is probably the

biggest drag on the economy right now

that we have along with I know the

frustrations people have about gas

prices what we’ve really seen is the

housing market which was a bubble had

greatly over inflated in all regions of

the country and I know I probably don’t

get a lot of sympathy about that here

because I can only imagine what rents

and mortgages you guys are paying it is

a real drag

in all sorts of ways people first of all

they feel poor even if they still have a

home where they’ve already purchased a

home because for a lot of folks their

mortgages now what’s called underwater

the mortgage is more than the home is

worth and so if you feel like your most

important asset is now worth less than

your debt that’s going to constrain how

you spend people who want to move have a

great deal of trouble selling and people

who want to buy as you pointed out are

seeing terms a lot more restrictive so

we’ve put in place a bunch of programs

to try to see if we can speed along the

process of reaching a new equilibrium

for example what we did was we went to

the mortgage lender and said why don’t

you renegotiate with your mortgage with

the person with the mortgage renegotiate

the terms of their mortgage so that

their principal is a little bit lower

they can afford the payments and that

way homes don’t get foreclosed on there

are fewer homes on the on the market and

that will raise prices and they’ll be

good for everybody and we’ve seen some

significant progress on that front the

challenge we still have as your

questioner properly points out is the

a lot of people who bought a first home

when credit was easy now we’re finding

the credit is tough and we’ve got to

strike a balance frankly there’s some

folks who are probably better off

renting and what we don’t want to do is

return to a situation where people are

putting no money down and they’ve got

very easy payment terms at the front end

and then it turns out five years from

now because they’ve got adjustable rate

mortgage that they couldn’t afford it

and they lose their home I think the

regulator’s are trying to get that

balance right

there are certain communities with high

foreclosure rates where what we’re

trying to do is see if can we help state

and local governments take over some of

these homes and convert them and provide

favorable terms to first-time home

buyers but frankly I think we’ve got to

understand that the days where it was

really easy to buy a house without any

money down is probably over and what we

what I’m really concerned about is

making sure that the housing market

overall recovers enough that it’s not

such a huge drag on the economy because

if it isn’t then people will have more

confidence they’ll spend more more

people will get hired and overall the

economy will improve but I recognize for

a lot of folks who want to be first-time

homebuyers it’s still tough out there

it’s getting better in certain areas but

in some places particularly where there

was a big housing bubble it’s not so I

think the next question is from Facebook

employee in the in the room today

so Lauren Hale has a question Lauren

where are you from hey Lauren I thank

you so much for joining us today I am

originally from Detroit Michigan and now

I’m out here working at Facebook so my

question for you kind of builds on some

of the things you were just talking

about at the beginning of your term you

spend a lot of time talking about job

creation and the road to economic

recovery and one of the ways to do that

would be substantially increasing

federal investments in various areas as

a way to fill the void left from

consumer spending

since then we’ve seen the conversation

shift from that of job creation and

economic recovery to that of spending

cuts and the deficit so would love to

know your thoughts on how you’re going

to balance these two going forward or

even potentially shift the conversation

back well you’re exactly right that when

I first came into office that our number

one job was preventing us from getting

into a another Great Depression and that

was what the Recovery Act was all about

so we helped States make sure that they

could minimize some of the layoffs and

some of the difficult budget choices

that that they faced we made sure that

we had infrastructure spending all

around the country and in fact we made

the biggest investment in infrastructure

since Dwight Eisenhower built the

interstate highway system we made the

largest investment in history and clean

energy research and it’s really paying

off for example when I came into office

we had about 2% of the advanced battery

manufacturing here in America and as

everybody here knows what’s really

holding us back from that my goal of a

million electric vehicles on the road is

that battery technology is still tough

it’s clunky it’s heavy it’s expensive

and if we can make significant

improvements in battery technology then

you know I think the opportunities for

electric vehicles alternative vehicles

that are much cheaper you know the our

opportunities are limitless

so so those were all investments that we

made in the first two years now the

economy is now growing it’s not growing

quite as fast as we would like because

after a financial crisis typically

there’s a bigger drag on the economy for

a longer period of time but it is

growing and over the last year and a

half we’ve seen almost two million jobs

created in the private sector because

this recession came at a time when we

were already

people in debt and that made the debt

worse if we don’t have a serious plan to

tackle the debt and the deficit that

could actually end up being a bigger

drag on the economy than anything else

if the markets start feeling that we’re

not serious about the problem and if you

start seeing investors feel uncertain

about the future then they could pull

back right at the time when the economy

is taking off so you’re right that it’s

tricky any but you know folks around

here are used to the hills in San

Francisco and if you’ve driven I don’t

know if they still have clutch cars

around here anybody ever driven a clutch

car you know I mean you got a sort of

tap and well that’s sort of what we’ve

faced in terms of the economy right

we’ve got to hit the accelerator but you

know we’ve got to also make sure that we

don’t gun it we can’t let the car slip

backwards and so what we’re trying to do

then is put together a debt and deficit

plan that doesn’t slash spending so

drastically that we can’t still make

investments in education that we can’t

still make investments in infrastructure

all of which would help the economy grow

in December we passed a targeted tax cut

for business investment as well as the

payroll tax that has a stimulus effect

that helps to grow the economy we can do

those things and still grow the economy

while having a plan in place to reduce

the deficit first by 2015 and then over

the long term so I think we can do both

but it does require the balanced

approach that I was talking about if all

we’re doing is spending cuts and we’re

not discriminating about it if we’re

using a machete instead of a scalpel and

we’re cutting out things that create

jobs then the deficit could actually get

worse because we could slip back into

another recession and obviously for

folks in Detroit where you’re from they

know that our investments can make a

difference because we essentially saved

the

US auto industry we’ve now have three

auto companies here in America that are

all turning a profit GM just announced

that it’s hiring back all of the workers

that it was planning to layoff and we

did so by the way at the same time as we

were able to increase fuel efficiency

standards on cars for the first time in

thirty years so it can be done but it

takes a balanced approach all right so

we have a question from the University

of Florida where in in February we

launched this initiative at

whitehouse.gov/youngamericans with this

goal to have a hundred youth roundtables

across the country and a bunch of them

are taking place right now watching this

Facebook live so Cesare Fernandez and

ELISA retinas are participating in one

of those roundtables and they want to

ask you this mr. president in your

deficit-reduction speech last week you

spoke of the need to not only reduce

government spending but to also increase

federal revenue in light of our nation’s

budget challenges will your

administration consider a visiting

policies such as the DREAM Act which the

Congressional Budget Office estimates

will reduce the deficit by 1.4 billion

and increase the government revenue by

2.3 billion over the next 10 years let

me let me talk about not only the DREAM

Act but about immigration policy

generally and I want to thank Sheryl

Sandberg actually participated in

discussion that we had yesterday

bringing together business leaders and

government officials and faith leaders a

broad cross-section of Americans

together to talk about how do we finally

fix an immigration system that’s

fundamentally broken for those of you

who aren’t familiar the DREAM Act is it

deals with a particular portion of the

population kids who were brought here

when they were young by their parents

their parents might have come here

illegally the kids didn’t do anything

they were just doing what kids do which

is follow the

parents they’ve grown up as Americans

they went to school with us or with our

kids they think of themselves as

Americans but many of them still don’t

have a legal status and so what we’ve

said is for especially for these young

people who are our neighbors our friends

our children’s friends you know if they

are of good character and going to

school or joining our military they want

to be part of the American family why

wouldn’t we want to embrace them why

would why would why wouldn’t we want to

make sure that why wouldn’t we want to

make sure that they’re contributing to

our future so that’s the DREAM Act but

that’s just a small part of a broader

challenge that we have immigration in

this country has always been complicated

you know the truth of the matter is that

we are both a nation of immigrants and a

nation of laws sometimes the laws

haven’t been fair sometimes the laws

have been restricted to certain ethnic

groups there have been quotas sometimes

our immigration policies have been

arbitrary and have been determined by

whether industry at a particular time

was willing to bring in workers on the

cheek but what’s undeniable is America

is a nation of immigrants that’s our

history and that’s what makes us

stronger because we’ve got ambitious

people from all around the world who

come here because they’ve got a new idea

and and and they want to create the next

big thing or they just want a better

future for their kids and their family

and that dynamism is part of what’s

propelled our progress and kept us young

now I think most Americans understand

that and most Americans agree with that

at the same time I think most Americans

feel there should be an orderly process

to do it

people shouldn’t just be coming here and

cutting in front of the line essentially

and staying without having gone through

the proper channels so what we’ve said

is let’s fix the whole system first of

all let’s make the legal immigration

system more fair than it is and more

efficient than it is and that includes

by the way something I know that is of

great concern here in Silicon Valley if

we’ve got smart people who want to come

here and start businesses and our PhDs

and math and science and computer

science and why don’t we want them to

stay I mean why would we want to send

them someplace else so

well those are potential job creators

those are job generators you know I

think about somebody like an Andy Grove

of Intel I you know we want more Andy

groves here in the United States we

don’t want them starting companies we

don’t want them starting Intel in China

or starting it in France we want them

starting it here so there’s a lot that

we can do for making sure that

high-skilled immigrants who come here

study we’ve paid for their college

degrees we’ve given them scholarships

we’ve given them this training let’s

make sure that if they want to reinvest

and make their future here in America

that they can so that’s point number one

but point number two is you also have a

lot of unskilled workers who are now

here who are living in the shadows

they’re contributing to our economy in

all sorts of ways they’re working in the

agricultural sector they are in

restaurants and they’re you know in

communities all across the country

looking after children and and helping

to build America but they’re they’re

scared and they feel as if they’re

locked out of their surroundings

and what I’ve said is they did break the

law they came here they have to take

responsibility for that they should pay

a fine they should learn English they

should go to the back of the line so

that they don’t automatically get

citizenship but there should be a

pathway for them to get legalized in our

society so they don’t fear for

themselves or their families so that

families aren’t separated at the same

time let’s make sure we’ve got a secure

border so that folks aren’t wandering

through the desert to get here let’s

make the legal immigration system more

efficient and more effective so there

aren’t huge backlogs this is all part of

what we call comprehensive immigration

reform

and there’s no reason why we shouldn’t

be able to achieve a that is fair is

equitable is an economic engine for

America that helps the people who are

already here get acculturated and make

sure that our laws aren’t being broken

but we’re still true to our traditions

but as I mentioned to Cheryl yesterday I

can’t solve this problem by myself Nancy

Pelosi is a big champion of this the

Democratic caucus in the house I think

is prepared for a majority of them are

prepared to advance comprehensive

immigration reform but we’re gonna have

to have bipartisan support in order to

make it happen and all of you have to

make sure your voices are heard saying

this is a priority this is something

important because if if politicians

don’t hear from you then then it

probably won’t happen I can’t do it by

myself we’re gonna have to change laws

in Congress but I’m confident we can

make it happen

[Applause]

[Music]

all right so the next one is from a

facebook employee Lee or Abraham Leo

where are you from hey leo hey hey I’m

from San originally from San Jose

California my question is the 2012

budget plan proposed by Paul Ryan has

been praised by many in the media as

bold or brave do you see this as a time

that calls for boldness and do you think

that you’re the plan you outlined last

week demonstrates sufficient boldness or

is this just a media creation you know

it’s a great question look here’s what

I’d say the the the Republican budget

that was put forward I would say is

fairly radical I wouldn’t call it

particularly courageous I do think mr.

Ryan is sincere I think he’s a patriot I

think he wants to solve a real problem

which is our long-term deficit but I

think that what he and the other

Republicans in the House of

Representatives also want to do is

change our social compact in a pretty

fundamental way their basic view is that

no matter how successful I am no matter

how much I’ve taken from this country

you know I wasn’t born wealthy you know

I was raised by a single mom and my

grandparents I went to college on

scholarships there was a time when my

mom was trying to get her PhD where for

a short time she had to take food stamps

my grandparents relied on Medicare and

Social Security to help supplement their

income when they got old so their notion

is despite the fact that I’ve benefited

from all these investments my

grandfather benefited from the GI Bill

after he fought in World War two

that somehow I now have no obligation

to people who are less fortunate than me

and I have no real obligation to future

generations to make investments so that

they have a better future

so what his budget proposal does is not

only hold income tax flat he actually

wants to further reduce taxes for the

wealthy further reduced taxes for

corporations not pay for those and in

order to make his numbers work cut 70%

out of our clean energy budget cut 25%

out of our education budget cut

transportation budgets by 1/3 I guess

you could call that bold I would call it

short-sighted on

and then as I said there’s a fundamental

difference between how the Republicans

and and and I think about Medicare and

Medicaid in our health care system their

basic theory is that if we just turn

Medicare into a voucher program and turn

Medicaid into Block Grant programs then

now you a Medicare recipient will go out

and you’ll shop for the best insurance

that you’ve got that you can find and

that you’re going to control costs

because you’re gonna say the insurance

company this is all I can afford that

will control costs except if you get

sick and the policy that you bought

doesn’t cover what you’ve got then

either you’re gonna mortgage your house

or you’re gonna go to the emergency room

in which case I who do have insurance

you’re gonna have to pay for it

indirectly because the hospital’s going

to have uncompensated care so they don’t

really want to make the health care

system more efficient and cheaper what

they want to do is to push the costs of

health care inflation on to you and then

you’ll be on your own trying to figure

out in the marketplace how to make

health care cheaper the problem is

you’re just one person now you work at

Facebook it’s a big enough company

Facebook can probably negotiate with

insurance companies and providers to get

you a pretty good deal but if you’re a

startup company if you’re an

entrepreneur out there in the back of

your garage good luck trying to get

insurance on your own you can’t do it if

you’re somebody who’s older and has a

pre-existing condition insurance

companies won’t take you so what we’ve

said is let’s make sure instead of just

pushing the costs off on the people who

individually are not gonna have any

negotiating power ability to change how

providers operate or how hospitals or

doctors operate how insurance companies

operate

let’s make sure that we have a system

both for Medicare but also for people

who currently don’t have health

insurance where they can be part of a

big pool they can negotiate for changes

in how the healthcare system works so

that it’s more efficient so it’s more

effective so that you get better care so

that we have fewer infection rates for

example in hospitals so there are fewer

readmission rates so that we’re caring

for the chronically ill more effectively

so that there are fewer unnecessary

tests that’s how you save money the

government will save money but you’ll

also save money so we think that’s a

better way of doing it now what they’ll

say is well you know what that’ll never

work because it’s government imposed and

it’s bureaucracy and it’s a government

takeover and they’re death panels and I

you know I still don’t entirely

understand the whole death panel concept

but I guess what they’re saying is

somehow some remote bureaucrat will be

deciding your healthcare for you all

we’re saying is if we’ve got health care

experts doctors and nurses and consumers

who are helping to design how Medicare

works more intelligently then we don’t

have to radically change Medicare so yes

I think it’s fair to say that their

vision is radical no I don’t think it’s

particularly courageous because the last

point I’ll make is this nothing is

easier than solving a problem on the

backs of people who are poor or people

who are powerless or don’t have

lobbyists or don’t have clout

I don’t think that’s particular

courageous

all right the next one’s from the web

we’ve got a question from Kwame Simmons

from Orlando Florida and he asks I

strongly believe that education is the

greatest equalizer with so many problems

plaguing our current system is it

possible to examine a complete overhaul

of the systems that addresses the needs

and modern students and before you jump

in I just want to say if someone who’s

spent a bunch of time researching

education who cares about this I think

that their race to the top stuff that

you guys have done is one of most

underappreciated and most important

things that your administration has done

I appreciate that the this is an area

where actually I think you’ve seen the

parties actually come together and

there’s some good bipartisan work being

done it used to be that the argument

around education always revolved around

the Left saying we just need more money

and the right saying we should just blow

up the system because public schools

aren’t doing a good job and what you’re

now saying is people under recognizing

we need both money and reform it’s not

an either/or proposition it’s a both/and

proposition so what Mark just mentioned

something called race to the top pretty

simple concept most federal dollars are

allocated through a formula you know if

you’ve got a certain number of poor kids

or you’ve got certain number of disabled

kids in your school district there’s a

formula and you get a certain amount of

money in every state and every school

district gets that money according to

the formula what we did was we took

about one percent of the total spending

on education and we said to get this one

percent show us that you’re reforming

the system it’s almost it’s like a

competition model and so every state

every school district could apply and

you had to show us that you had a good

plan to retrain teachers

recruit and and do good professional

development so we got the best teachers

possible you had to have accountability

you had to show us that you were

actually making progress in the schools

and that you were measuring through data

the improvements that were being made

that you were reaching into the schools

that were hardest to reach because there

are about 2,000 schools around the

country that account for the majority of

dropouts in our country there like

dropout factories so show us a plan to

go into those schools and really make a

big difference

and what’s happened is that over 40

states in the process of competing for

this extra money ended up initiating

probably the most meaningful reforms

that we’ve seen in a generation and so

it’s made a huge difference even those

states that didn’t end up actually

winning the competition still made

changes that are improving the potential

for good outcomes in the schools so

that’s the kind of creative approach

that you’ve seen some Democrats and some

Republicans embrace and our hope is we

can build on that a couple of things

that we know work the most important

thing to a good education is making sure

we’ve got a good teacher in front of

that classroom and so providing more

support for teachers recruiting the best

and brightest into teaching making sure

that they’re compensated but also making

sure that they’re performing that’s

hugely important the other thing is good

data so that there’s a constant feedback

not just a bunch of standardized tests

that go into a drawer or the people may

gaym in order not to get penalized

that’s what happened under No Child Left

Behind but instead real good data that

you can present to the teacher while

they’re still teaching that child and

say you know what this child is falling

behind in math here’s some ways to do it

to improve their performance so we’re

starting to see real progress on the

ground and I’m optimistic that we can

actually before the 2012 election

potentially have a federal education law

that will

embody some of the best information that

we have about how to initiate good

school reform now last point I’ll make

on this government alone can’t do it one

of the things every time I come to

Silicon Valley that I’m inspired by but

I’m also frustrated by is how many smart

people are here but also frustrated that

I always hear stories about how we can’t

find enough engineers we can’t find

enough computer programmers you know

what that means our education systems

not working the way it should and that’s

got to start early and that’s why we’re

emphasizing math and science that’s why

we’re emphasizing teaching girls math

and science that’s why we’re emphasizing

making sure that black and Hispanic kids

are getting math and science you know

we’ve got we’ve got to do such a better

job when it comes to STEM education and

that that’s one of the reasons by the

way that we had our first science fair

at the White House in a very long time

just because we want to start making

science cool I I want I want everybody

to feel the same way that they did I

want people to feel the same way about

you know the next big energy

breakthrough or the Beck the next big

Internet breakthrough I want people to

feel the same way they felt about the

moon launch then that that’s how we’re

going to stay competitive for the future

and that’s why these investments in

education are so important but as I said

we’re government alone can’t do it

there’s got to be a shift in American

culture where once again we buckle down

and we say this stuff’s important and

it’s that’s why I mark the work you’re

doing a new work for example the the

work that folks like you know the Gates

Foundation are doing in philanthropic

investments in best practices in

education especially around math and

science training that are going to be so

important we’ve got to lift we’ve got a

pit

lift our game up when it comes to

technology in math and science that’s

hopefully one of the most important

legacies that I can have as president

the United States

all right so the next one is from

another Facebook employee here so

they’re James Mitchell

so James Mitchell where are you from

well here’s James Becker hi mr.

president

hey James Mitchell born in Chicago and

raised out here in Cupertino California

I have yet another question for you

about the debt and healthcare go ahead

so the biggest threat we have fiscal is

that is the rise in health care costs

unfortunately a lot of the solutions we

here to Medicare and Medicaid

don’t involve actually slowing down the

rise in health care costs instead they

involve shifting costs to beneficiaries

and States so my question is can you

talk a bit more about what provisions in

the Affordable Health Care Act are

designed to slow down the rise of health

care costs and what policies you’d like

to see enacted in the future to continue

to slow down the rise of health care

costs let me give you a couple of

examples because you’re exactly right in

how you described it I don’t want to

just shift the health care costs onto

the American people I want to actually

reduce health care costs let’s take the

example of health IT now we’re in

Silicon Valley so we can talk about IT

stuff now I’ll try to sound like I know

what I’m talking about the health care

system is one of the few aspects of our

society where a lot of stuff is still

done on paper right well if last time

you guys went to a doctor’s office or

maybe to your dentist’s office how many

people still had like fill out a form on

a clipboard right and the reason for

that is because a large chunk of our

provider system is is not automated so

what ends up happening is you may go to

your primary care physician he worked he

does some basic tests he sees something

of concern he refers you to a specialist

you go to the specialist he’ll do

another test

you’re getting charged or your insurance

company is getting charged for both

those tests as opposed to the test that

was taken by your primary care physician

being emailed to the specialist or

better yet if it turns out that there

may be three or four specialists

involved because it’s a difficult

diagnosis this is all hypothetical you

look very healthy but let’s say there

are a bunch of specialists what would be

ideal would be if you get all the

specialists together with the primary

care physician the first time you’re

seen so that you’re not paying for

multiple visits as well as multiple

tests that’s not how it works right now

now part of it is technology so what we

did in the Affordable Care Act building

on what we did to the Recovery Act is

try to provide incentives to providers

to start getting integrated automated

systems and it’s tough because the

individual doctor may say to them him or

herself I don’t want to put the initial

capital outlay that’s expensive even

though it may make my system more

efficient later on so providing some

incentives some help for the front-end

investments for a community hospital or

for individual providers so that we can

slowly get this system more effective

that’s priority number one we know it

can be done by the way surprisingly

enough the healthcare system that is

does the best job on this of anybody is

actually the Veterans Administration the

VA healthcare system because it’s a

fully integrated system

you know everybody is working for the VA

all the doctors all the hospitals all

the providers so they’ve been able to

achieve huge cost savings just because

everybody’s on a single system it’s also

though how we reimburse doctors and how

we reimburse hospitals so right now what

happens is when you’ve taken those two

tests if you’re

old enough to qualify for Medicare well

each doctor sends their bill to Medicare

and Medicare pays both bills and let’s

say that you end up getting an operation

they’ll send the bill for that and so

Medicare pays that let’s say they didn’t

do a very good job or you got sick in

the hospital and you are readmitted and

you have to be treated again and they

have to do the operation all over again

Medicare then gets billed for the second

operation I mean imagine if that’s how

it worked at when you bought a car so

you go you buy your car a week later the

car doesn’t work you go back to the

dealer and they charged you to fix the

bad job that they did in the first place

well that’s what Medicare does all the

time so we don’t provide incentives for

performance we just provide we just pay

for the number of qualified items that

that were you know procedures that were

performed or tests that were performed

by the provider so what we want to do is

to start changing how folks are

reimbursed let’s take a hospital we want

to give this sort of like race to the

top what Mark was talking about in

education we want to be able to say to a

hospital if you do a really good job

reducing infection rates in hospital

which kill tens of thousands of people

across America every year and are a huge

cause for readmission rates and we know

that hospitals can drastically reduce

those reinfection rates just by simple

protocols of you know how employees are

washing their hands and how they’re

moving from room to room and so forth

there are hospitals who have done it if

we can say to a hospital you’ll get a

bonus for that Medicare will reimburse

you for instituting these simple

procedures that saves the whole system

money and that’s what we’ve tried to do

in the Affordable Care Act is to start

institutionalizing

these new systems but it takes time

because we’ve you know we’ve got a

private sector system it’s not like the

VA it’s a bunch of individual doctors

individual hospitals you know spread out

all across the country with private

insurers so it’s not something that we

can do overnight our hope is is that

over the next five years we’re able to

see significant savings through these

mechanisms and that will save everybody

not just people who are Medicare and

Medicaid it’ll save everybody money

including folks here at Facebook because

you know I’m sure that you guys provide

health insurance and I suspect if if you

look at your health insurance bills they

don’t make you happy

okay so we have time for only one more

question time it’s a question from from

Terry Atwater from Houston Texas if you

had to do anything differently during

your your first four years what would it

be well it’s only been two and a half so

I’m sure I’ll make more mistakes in the

next year and a half the jury will still

be out the you know there are all sorts

of day-to-day issues where I say to

myself

oh you know I didn’t say that right or I

didn’t explain this clearly enough or

maybe if I had sequenced you know this

plan first as opposed to that one maybe

it would have gotten done quicker health

care obviously was a huge battle and if

it hadn’t been for Nancy Pelosi and her

leadership in the House and and the

great work that

you know and a su and my Conda and

others that we wouldn’t have gotten it

done if it hadn’t been for great work in

Congress but but I I do think that it

was it was so complicated that at a

certain point people just started saying

uh this is typical Washington bickering

and you know I’ve I’ve asked myself

sometimes is there a way that we could

have gotten it done more quickly and in

a way that the American people wouldn’t

have been so frustrated by I’m not sure

I could have because there’s a reason

why it hadn’t gotten done in a hundred

years it is a it’s it’s hard to fix a

system as big as as health care and as

complicated as our health care system I

can tell you that I think the best way

to answer the question is what do I feel

I still have to get done where I still

feel a huge sense of urgency I’ve talked

about a couple of things getting our

deficits and debt under control in a

balanced way I feel needs to happen

while I’m president I don’t want to

leave it to the next president

immigration something I mentioned we

have not gotten done it’s something I

care deeply about it’s the right thing

for the country I want to get that done

while I’m president energy you know we

haven’t talked a lot about energy today

but you know first of all $4 a gallon

gas really hurts a lot of people around

this country it’s not because they’re

wasteful but if you’re driving 50 miles

to work and that’s the only job you can

find and you can’t afford some hybrid so

you’re stuck with the old beater that

you’re driving around to get gets eight

miles a gallon these gas prices are

killing you

right now and so this is the reason why

I’ve said that it is so important for us

to invest in new approaches to energy

we’ve got to have a long term plan it

means investing in things like solar and

wind investing in biofuels investing in

clean car technology it means converting

the federal fleet a hundred percent to

fuel-efficient vehicles because we’re a

huge market maker obviously you know it

turns out that I’ve got a lot of cars as

president and you know if we’re out

there purchasing electric cars and

hybrids and you know that can help boost

demand and drive down prices continuing

to increase fuel efficiency standards on

cars increasing oil production but in an

intelligent way I mean those are all

hugely important and by the way we can

pay for it let me let me say this we

lose the Treasury loses 4 billion

dollars a year on subsidies to oil

companies now think about this the top

five oil companies have made somewhere

between 75 billion and 125 billion every

year for the last five years nobody’s

doing better than Exxon nobody’s doing

better than Shell or these other

companies they are doing great they are

making money hand over fist

well maybe Facebook’s doing a little

better but but you get the idea they’re

doing really well

they don’t need special tax breaks that

cost us four billion dollars and so what

we’ve said is why can’t we eliminate the

tax breaks for the oil companies who are

doing great and invest that in new

energy sources that can help us save the

planet

so so when it comes to energy when it

comes to immigration when it comes to

getting our deficit under control in a

balanced and smart way when it comes to

improving our math and science education

when it comes to reinvesting in our

infrastructure we’ve just got a lot more

work to do and I guess my closing

comment mark would just be I hope that

everybody here that you don’t get

frustrated and cynical about our

democracy I mean it is frustrating lord

knows it’s frustrating I and I know that

some of you who might have been involved

in the campaign or been energized back

in 2008 you know you’re frustrated that

Kasia didn’t get done fast enough and it

seems like everybody’s bickering all the

time just remember that we’ve been

through tougher times before we’ve

always come out ascendant we’ve always

come out on top

because we’ve still got the best

universities in the world we’ve still

got the most productive workers in the

world this is still the most dynamic

entrepreneurial culture in the world if

we come together we can solve all these

problems but I I can’t do it by myself

the only way it happens is if all of you

still get involved still get engaged it

hasn’t been that long since Election Day

and we’ve gone through some very very

tough times and we’ve still gotten a lot

done we’ve still been able to get this

economy recovering we’ve still been able

to get health care passed we’ve still

been able to invest in clean energy

we’ve still been able to make sure that

we overturn Don’t Ask Don’t Tell we

still made sure that we got to women on

the Supreme Court

we’ve made progress so so rather than be

discouraged I hope everybody is willing

to double down and work even harder

regardless of your political affiliation

you’ve got to be involved especially the

young people here your generation if you

don’t give us a shove if you don’t give

the system a push it’s just not going to

change and you’re going to be the ones

who end up suffering the consequences

but if you are behind it if you put the

same energy and and imagination that you

put into Facebook into the political

process I guarantee you there’s nothing

we can’t solve all right thank you Mark

[Applause]

[Music]

[音乐]

有这么多的 Facebook 来主持

这个首先我的名字是

巴拉克奥巴马,我是那个得到马克

穿夹克和时间的人谢谢你我

很自豪第二次我知道

III 会说和 我讨厌在马克上讲故事

,但我们第一次一起吃饭

时,他和他穿着这件夹克和

领带,

我会说,吃到一半你知道

他开始有点出汗,这

对他来说真的很不舒服,所以我帮

他摆脱了 他的夹克,事实上,如果

你想要马克,我们可以脱掉我们的

夹克,那更好不是,但

你在这方面比我好很多,所以

首先我只想对所有人说声

谢谢 您抽出时间,

不仅是在座的

观众,还有

全国各地和世界各地的人们

正在观看这个市政厅。

我们想要这样做的主要原因首先是

因为越来越多的人,

尤其是年轻人 人们

通过不同的媒体获取信息

很明显,你们所有人

共同构建的东西

正在帮助彻底改变人们

获取信息的方式 他们处理

信息的方式 他们如何相互联系,

而且你知道历史

上什么是健康

民主的一部分 什么是好的政治是

当你 “有

知情的公民参与其中,

Facebook 允许我们做的是确保

这不仅仅是单向对话,

确保我不仅在和

你说话,而且你也在回话,

我们” 在对话中,我们

正在对话中,所以我喜欢以

这种形式召开市政厅会议,我认为这家公司

是我们能够进行对话的理想方式

正如马克所说,我会

很明显地知道我们'

现在正在就

我们国家的未来方向进行一场非常严肃的辩论,我们正在

经历一个动荡的时期

年轻人,但我们在

国内看到了一系列

挑战,从大萧条以来最严重的经济衰退开始,

我们刚刚走出困境,

我们遇到了各种各样的中断

技术中断

发生得最多 其中

承诺让我们的生活变得更好,

但也意味着人们

必须在整个经济中

做出很多调整

日复一日在外面受到挑战的人

担心他们是否可以支付

账单是否可以在国际上保持自己的家

我们正在

看到我们这一代人从未见过的各种变化

就像能源和气候变化一样,没有

一个国家可以解决,但我们

必须一起解决,我们还

没有所有的机构来解决

这个问题,但是是什么让

我非常乐观,这就是

为什么来到 Facebook

对我来说如此令人兴奋的原因是,在我们历史上的每一个关头,

每当我们面临这样的挑战时,

无论是

从农业时代到工业

时代的转变,还是面临着

冷战的挑战或试图

弄清楚我们如何在每个关键时刻让这个国家更

公平和更具包容性

我们总是能够适应

我们已经能够改变并且我们

能够领先于曲线

今天也是如此,

你们处于正在发生的事情的最前沿

,所以我

很想和大家谈谈为什么

我们围绕债务

和赤字进行的这场辩论如此重要,因为

它是 将帮助确定我们是否

可以投资于我们的未来和基础

研究、创新和

基础设施,使我们能够

在 21 世纪竞争,并仍然

为我们中最脆弱的人保留一个安全网,

但我也

想与你分享关于如何让我们的

民主更好地运作和我们的

政治性更好地运作的想法,因为我

认为如果我们决定

要解决它,就没有我们无法解决的问题 在一起,为此我很

感激有机会与你交谈,

而不是仅仅发表大量

冗长的演讲,我想确保

我们有时间尽可能多地提出问题,

所以马奎特我明白

你有 第一个是的,让我们开始吧

,让我们从

关于死权的对话开始,所以我

知道昨天早上你

在弗吉尼亚州的一个市政厅

讨论了你的框架,不仅是

为了解决短期预算

问题,而且是为了解决长期预算问题。 定期债务,你

花了一些时间谈论税收改革

和削减成本,但你也花

了很多时间谈论

你认为我们不能削减

教育基础设施和清洁

能源的事情,所以我的问题是

首先是您认为我们

应该做什么以及您

认为我们可以具体削减什么以使这

一切顺利进行首先让我

标记与您分享

问题的性质,因为我 认为很多

人都明白这是一个问题,

但不确定它是如何在

2000 年克林顿政府结束时出现的,

我们不仅

预算平衡,而且实际上有

盈余,部分原因是

克林顿总统

共和党国会民主党国会

和乔治·H·W·布什总统已经做出了一些艰难的决定,

他们所说的是让我们确保

我们在重要的事情上明智地花钱让我们在

不重要的事情上少花钱

重要的是,让我们确保

我们的生活量入为出,我们

获得了足够的收入来支付其中

一些基本义务当时发生的事情

是我们经历了 10 年,

我们忘记了是什么创造了这个惊喜

首先,所以我们进行了大规模的

减税,但没有被削减

开支所抵消,我们有两次没有

支付的战争,这是历史上第一次

我们参加战争而不

要求额外的 来自

美国公民的牺牲,

我们有一个没有支付的巨大处方药计划

,所以到

我上任时,我们已经有大约一

万亿美元的年度赤字,我们

有巨额的累积债务和

利息支付,那么你就有了

这个巨大的 经济衰退,因此

会发生收入减少,因为

公司销售额较低,个人

同时赚的钱更少,而且

那里有更多的需求,所以

我们必须帮助各州,我们

必须帮助地方政府,而

复苏的大部分内容是我们

确保经济不会

陷入萧条,

确保教师没有被解雇,

消防员没有被解雇,并且

仍有建设工程 oads

等等所有这些都是昂贵的我的意思

是增加了价值约一万亿

美元的债务所以现在

我们所面临的情况是不仅我们有

这些累积的债务而且婴儿

潮一代刚刚开始退休

而且是什么 可怕的不仅是

婴儿潮一代以更高的速度退休,

这意味着他们对社会保障提出了更高的

要求,但主要是

医疗保险和医疗补助,但医疗保健

费用的上涨速度比通货膨胀快得多,

而且老年人口使用更多的医疗

保健费用 综上所述,

我们面临着一个不可持续的局面,所以

现在我们面临一个关键时刻,

我们将不得不做出一些决定

,我们如何在

短期内降低债务,以及如何在长期内降低

债务

短期内 民主党人和共和党人现在同意

我们必须在未来 10 年内将债务减少约

4 万亿美元

,我知道这听起来像是

很多钱,但这是可行的 如果我们

以平衡的方式做到这一点,我建议在

10 到 10 到 12 年内减少大约 2 万亿美元的支出,

你知道政府浪费,

就像其他所有主要机构一样

,所以我们做的事情是

我们负担得起的 现在不做有些

我想做的事情很有趣,

但我们现在负担不起,

所以我们在每个领域都进行了削减,一个很好的

例子是五角大楼的支出,

国会经常将武器系统塞进

五角大楼本身说我们不需要的五角大楼预算,但

特殊利益和选民

帮助五角大楼预算膨胀,所以

我们已经将五角大楼的

预算减少了大约 4000 亿美元,我们

认为我们可以再做大约 4000

亿美元,所以我们 必须同时考虑

在非安全问题

和国防开支上的支出,然后

我们所说的是,让我们再拿出一

万亿美元,我们通过

税收制度改革筹集的资金,允许

人们 像我一样,坦率地说,你

多付了一点税

。 那时我正试图

巧妙地说出这句话,

但对于你们中的那些人来说,

经济正在蓬勃发展,

富人变得越来越富有

,如果我们回到那个时候,那是没有问题的

仅这些利率本身

就可以大大减少

我们的整体支出,如果我们能够

在收入方面获得一万亿美元,两

万亿美元并削减支出,我们

仍然可以对基础研究进行投资,

我们仍然可以投资于我们的东西 调用

arpa-e,它与 DARPA 类似,只是

专注于能源,这样我们就可以找出

可以帮助

我们减少对化石燃料依赖的下一个突破性技术 我们

仍然可以对教育进行投资,

所以我们已经扩大了 d 佩尔助学金

计划,以便更多的年轻人能够

上大学

  • 高速铁路并投资

于下一代宽带

和无线,并确保每个人

都可以访问互联网,我们可以做所有

这些事情,同时仍然

降低中期赤字现在这是

最后一个组成部分,我知道这一点

答案很长,但我想确保

每个人都有基本的

基础,即使我们得到这 4 万亿

美元,我们仍然存在

医疗保险和医疗补助的长期问题,

因为医疗保健成本

上涨得比通货膨胀快得多 工资和

薪水,这是

与共和党人进行另一场重大哲学辩论的地方,

因为我所说的

是我们改变它的最佳方式

是建立在健康 r 我们

去年取得的进步,并开始

为我们的医疗保健美元带来更好的收益 我们在医疗保健上浪费了

太多,我们在医疗保健上的花费

比地球上任何其他国家都多 20%,

而且我们的结果更糟,

因为我们最终

会在可能的情况下进行多次测试 只需做一项测试,然后

在 Facebook 上的医生之间分享,

例如,我们可以专注于

慢性病患者 20% 的患者

占 80% 的费用,所以做

一些简单的事情,比如报销

医院和医生以降低他们的

再入院率和管理某人

患有糖尿病等慢性病,

这样他们就可以定期服药,

这样他们就不会

去急诊室

,这可以节省大量资金,

这就是

去年或一年的医疗改革 半年前,

我们

所做的就是在此基础上继续

改进制度,共和党人

现在所说的是第一,他们

不能同意任何增税

,这意味着我们会 必须削减这

4 万亿美元,所有这些都来自

教育交通领域,我

认为这对我们的长期

未来至关重要,例如,他们提议

削减 70% 的清洁能源,

我不知道我们如何

在 对外国石油的依赖

和任何支付天然气价格的人都

知道,如果我们不

投资基础研究和技术

,让太阳能风能和其他能源

在 同时

他们说的是让我们把医疗保险变成

一个代金券计划,这样退休人员

就不会知道他们总是

会得到医疗保健,他们会

得到一张代金券,可以

支付部分费用以及任何医疗保健通胀

来 一切都将由他们承担,

如果健康保险公司不

向您出售涵盖您的疾病的保单,那么

您就不走运了,我认为

拥有ab对我们来说非常重要 asic

社会安全网 为有残疾孩子的家庭

为老年人

为在疗养院的人提供 我认为

对我们投资

基础研究很重要 我们可以做所有这些

事情 但我们只能

做到 通过采取平衡的方法

,这就是这场大辩论的

全部内容 现在 好吧

好吧 对不起 不是要切断

掌声 不 不 不 不 不 非常

彻底的回答 不 他们被他们

惊呆了 这个答案的长度,

但是是的,这是一个复杂的东西,所以

下一个问题是

来自弗吉尼亚州威廉斯堡的一个观看 Facebook 直播的 jf teen

写信并询问住房危机

不会消失

为中低收入新购房者提供的抵押贷款融资

正在成为

作为总统非常困难 你能做些什么来放松

那些取消

合格购房者拥有第一套房子的资格的政策

你如何向

中低档购房者保证他们 将

有机会拥有他们的第一套房子

这是一个很好的问题,

老实说,这可能是

目前对经济的最大拖累

,我知道

人们对汽油

价格的挫败感 我真的看到了

房地产市场,这是一个泡沫

,在全国所有地区都大大过度膨胀

,我知道我

在这里可能没有得到太多的同情,

因为我只能想象

你们正在支付的租金和抵押贷款 这是

一个真正

的拖累人们首先

他们感到很穷,即使他们仍然有一个

已经买了房子的

房子,因为对于很多人来说,他们的

抵押贷款现在所谓的

水下抵押贷款不仅仅是 房子是

值得的,所以如果你觉得你最

重要的资产现在比

你的债务还值钱,那将限制

你如何花钱那些想搬家的人在

卖东西和想买东西的人方面遇到了很大的麻烦。

你指出

看到条款更加严格,所以

我们已经制定了一系列计划

,试图看看我们是否可以加快

达到新平衡的过程,

例如我们所做的是我们去

了抵押贷款机构和 说你为什么不

与抵押贷款人重新谈判你的抵押

贷款重新谈判

他们的抵押贷款条款,以便

他们的本金稍微低一点,

他们可以负担得起,

这样房屋就不会因为房屋减少而被取消抵押品赎回权

在市场上,

这将提高价格,它们

对每个人都有好处,我们已经看到

在这方面取得了一些重大

进展正如你的

提问者正确指出的那样,我们仍然面临的挑战

是很多人第一次购买 回家

时信贷很容易,现在我们

发现信贷很困难,

坦率地说,我们必须取得平衡,有些

人可能最好

租房,我们不想做的是

回到人们

没有存钱,他们

在前端有非常简单的付款条件

,然后结果是五年后,

因为他们有可调整利率的

抵押贷款,他们负担不起,

而且他们失去了他们的家我认为

监管机构正试图

在某些社区的

止赎率很高的情况下取得平衡,我们正在

尝试做的是看看我们是否可以帮助州

和地方政府接管其中

一些房屋并将其转换并提供

优惠条件首先- 是时候

购房了,但坦率地说,我认为我们必须

明白,

没有任何

首付就可以轻松买房的日子可能已经结束,我们

真正关心的是

确保整个房地产市场

恢复得足够好,不会

对经济造成如此巨大的拖累,因为

如果不是这样,人们就会更有

信心,他们会花更多的钱,更多的

人会被雇用,整体

经济会有所改善,但我承认

很多想成为首次

购房者的人 那里仍然很艰难,

在某些地区正在变得更好,但

在某些地方,特别是在

房地产泡沫很大的地方,情况并非如此,所以我

认为下一个问题来自 Facebook

员工 今天的房间,

所以劳伦黑尔有一个问题劳伦

,你从哪里来,劳伦,我

非常感谢你今天加入我们我

来自密歇根州底特律,现在

我在 Facebook 工作,所以我

对你的问题建立在

您刚刚在任期开始时谈论的一些事情您

花了很多时间谈论

创造就业机会和经济复苏之路,

而实现这一目标的方法

之一是大幅增加

联邦在各个领域的投资

作为 填补消费支出留下的空白的方法

从那时起,我们看到谈话

从创造就业和

经济复苏转向

削减支出和赤字,所以很乐意

知道你对如何平衡这两者的想法,

甚至可能把谈话转

回来 这

就是《复苏法案》的全部内容,

因此我们帮助各州确保他们

可以最大限度地减少裁员和他们面临的

一些困难的预算选择

,我们确保

我们在全国各地都有基础设施支出

,事实上

自德怀特·艾森豪威尔(Dwight Eisenhower)建造

州际公路系统以来,我们在基础设施方面进行了

最大的投资,我们在历史和清洁能源研究方面进行了最大的投资,

并且确实得到了

回报,例如,当我上任时,

我们拥有大约 2% 的先进电池

制造 美国和

这里的每个人都知道真正

阻碍我们实现

上百万辆电动汽车的

目标是 t 电池技术仍然很艰难

它很笨重 它很重 它很

昂贵 如果我们可以

在电池技术上做出重大改进 那么

你知道我认为电动汽车的机会

更便宜的替代车辆你知道我们的

机会是无限的

所以这些都是 我们

在前两年所做的投资 现在

经济正在增长 它的增长

速度并没有我们想要的那么快,因为

在金融危机之后,通常

会在更长的时间内对经济造成更大的拖累,

但它正在

不断增长 在过去的一年

半里,我们看到私营部门创造了近 200 万个工作岗位

,因为

这次衰退发生在我们

已经负债累累的时候,

如果我们没有认真的计划来解决,债务会变得更糟

如果市场开始觉得我们对经济不认真,那么债务和赤字

实际上可能最终对经济造成更大

的拖累 问题,如果你

开始看到投资者

对未来感到不确定,那么他们可能

会在经济起飞的时候

撤退,所以你说得对,这很

棘手,但你知道

这里的人们已经习惯了 San 的山丘

弗朗西斯科,如果你开过车,我不

知道他们附近是否还有离合

车,有人开过离合

车,你知道我的意思是你有

一种水龙头,这就是我们

在 经济是正确的,

我们必须踩油门,但你

知道我们还必须确保我们

不会开枪,我们不能让汽车

倒退,所以我们要做的

就是放在一起 一项债务和赤字

计划不会大幅削减支出,

以至于我们仍然

无法对教育进行投资,我们

仍然无法对基础设施进行投资,

所有这些都将有助于经济

增长 12 月我们通过了一项有针对性的减税

计划 商业投资以及

工资税

有助于经济增长的刺激效应 我们可以做

这些事情并继续增长经济,

同时制定一项计划,

首先在 2015 年之前减少赤字,然后

是长期的,所以我认为我们可以两者都做,

但它确实需要平衡

我正在谈论的方法如果

我们所做的只是削减开支

,如果我们

使用砍刀而不是手术刀,并且

我们正在削减创造

就业机会的东西,那么我们就不会歧视它,那么赤字实际上可能会得到

更糟糕的是,我们可能会重新陷入

另一场衰退,很明显,

对于你来自底特律的人们来说,他们

知道我们的投资可以带来

改变,因为我们基本上拯救

美国汽车业,我们

现在在美国拥有三家汽车公司

通用汽车刚刚宣布

,它正在招聘所有

计划裁员的工人,而我们

这样做的同时,

我们能够提高

汽车的燃油效率标准 这是 30 年来的第一次,

所以它可以做到,但它

需要一种平衡的方法,所以

我们有一个来自佛罗里达大学的问题,

我们在 2 月份

在 whitehouse.gov/youngamericans 上发起了这项计划,

目标是有一个 全国有一百场青年

圆桌会议,其中

很多人现在正在观看这个

Facebook 直播,所以 Cesare Fernandez 和

ELISA 视网膜正在参加其中

一个圆桌会议,他们

想问你这位先生。 总统在

上周的削减赤字演讲中

谈到,鉴于我们国家的预算挑战,不仅需要减少

政府支出,而且还需要增加

联邦收入

预计未来 10 年赤字减少 14 亿

,政府收入增加

23 亿 让

我让我不仅谈谈 DREAM

法案,还谈

一般的移民政策,我要感谢 Sheryl

Sandberg 实际参与

了我们的讨论 昨天

让商界领袖、

政府官员和信仰领袖聚集了

广泛的美国人

,讨论我们如何最终

修复一个

对于

那些不熟悉《梦想法案》的人来说从根本上被破坏的移民制度

。 小时候

被带到这里的特定人群中的一部分

孩子 他们的父母

他们的父母可能非法来到这里

孩子们没有做任何事情

他们只是在做孩子们做的事情 这

就是跟随

他们作为美国人长大的父母

他们和我们一起上学 或者和

他们认为自己的孩子一起上学 作为

美国人,但他们中的许多人仍然

没有合法身份,所以我们

所说的特别是针对这些

年轻人,他们是我们的邻居,我们的朋友,

我们孩子的朋友,你知道他们

是否有良好的品格和

上学或 加入我们的军队 他们

想成为美国大家庭的一员

我们为什么不想拥抱他们 为什么

我们为什么

不想确定 我们为什么

不想确定他们为

我们的未来,这就是《梦想法案》,

但这只是我们在这个国家拥有移民的更广泛挑战的一小部分,

你知道事情的真相是,

我们既是一个移民国家,也是一个

法治国家 有时

法律不公平 有时

法律仅限于某些

族裔 有配额 有时

我们的移民政策是

武断的,

取决于行业在特定时间

是否愿意在脸颊上引进工人,

但 不可否认的是,美国

是一个移民国家,这就是我们的

历史,这就是让我们

变得更强大的原因,因为我们有

来自世界各地的雄心勃勃的人

来到这里,因为他们有一个新的想法

,而且他们想要创造下一个

大事,或者他们只是希望

他们的孩子和家人有一个更美好的未来,

而这种活力是

推动我们进步并使我们现在保持年轻的一部分

我认为大多数美国人都理解

这一点,同时大多数美国人也同意这一点

我认为大多数美国人

觉得应该有一个有序的过程

来做这件事

人们不应该只是来到这里并

基本上在线路前面

切入并且没有h 已经通过

了适当的渠道,所以我们所说的

是让我们首先修复整个系统,

让我们让合法移民

系统比现在更公平,更

高效

,顺便说一下,这包括我所知道的

如果

我们有聪明的人想来

这里创业,我们的博士

,数学,科学和计算机

科学,我们在硅谷非常担心,我们为什么不希望他们

留下我的意思是我们为什么要派

他们 在其他地方那么

好那些是潜在的就业创造

者那些是创造就业机会的人你知道我

想像英特尔的安迪·格罗夫这样的人

我你知道我们想要

在美国有更多的安迪·格罗夫我们

不希望他们创办我们不希望的公司

希望他们在中国创办英特尔公司

或在法国创办英特尔公司

s

我们为他们提供了这种培训的奖学金,让我们

确保如果他们想再投资

并在美国创造他们的未来,

那么他们可以做到这一点,这是第一点,

但第二点是你现在也有

很多不熟练的工人

在这里 他们生活在阴影中

他们以各种方式为我们的经济做出贡献

他们在

农业部门工作 他们在

餐馆工作 他们在

全国各地的社区中都很有名

照顾孩子并

帮助建设美国 但他们很

害怕,他们觉得自己被

锁在了周围环境之外

,我说的是他们确实违反了

法律,他们来到这里,他们必须为此承担

责任,他们应该支付他们应该支付

的罚款 学习英语,他们

应该排在最后,

这样他们就不会自动获得

公民身份,但应该有

一条让他们在我们的社会中合法化的途径,

这样他们就不会为

自己或家人担心,所以 在

家庭不同时分开

让我们确保我们有一个安全的

边界,这样人们就不会

穿越沙漠来到这里让我们

让合法的移民系统更有

效率和更有效,所以

没有巨大的 积压 这是

我们所谓的全面移民

改革的一部分

,我们没有理由

不能实现公平

公正是美国的经济引擎

,可以帮助

已经在这里的人们适应并

确保 我们的法律没有被违反,

但我们仍然忠于我们的传统,

但正如我昨天向谢丽尔提到的那样,我

自己无法解决这个问题南希佩洛西

是众议院民主党核心小组的大支持者,我认为

是 为他们中的大多数人

做好准备 准备推进全面的

移民改革,但我们

必须得到两党的支持

才能实现这一目标,你们所有人

都必须确保听到自己的声音说

这是一个优先事项,这很

重要,因为如果政客

们没有收到您的来信,那么

它可能不会发生

可以实现

[掌声]

[音乐]

好吧,下一个来自

Facebook 员工 Lee 或 Abraham Leo

你在哪里 嘿 leo 嘿嘿 我

来自 San 最初来自加利福尼亚州圣何塞

我的问题是 2012 年

预算计划 Paul Ryan 的提议

被许多媒体称赞为

大胆或勇敢你认为这是

一个需要勇气的时代吗?你

认为你上周概述的计划是否

表现出足够的勇气,

或者这只是一个媒体 创造你知道

这是一个很好的问题看看这就是

我要说的共和党提出的预算

我会说是

相当激进的我不会称之为

特别勇敢我确实认为先生。

Ryan 是真诚的 我认为他是一个爱国者

他们的基本观点是,

无论我多么成功,无论

我从这个国家拿走了多少,

你知道我生来并不富裕,你知道

我是由一个单身母亲和我的

祖父母抚养长大的,我上了大学

奖学金 有一段时间,我

妈妈试图获得博士学位,

但她不得不在短时间内领取食品券

我的

祖父在二战后从退伍军人法案中受益的所有这些

投资都让我受益匪浅 未来

几代人进行投资,以便

他们拥有更美好的未来,

因此他的预算提案所做的

不仅是保持所得税不变,他实际上

还想进一步为

富人减税,为

不支付这些费用的公司进一步减税,

以使他的 数字工作

从我们的清洁能源预算中削减了 70%

从我们的教育预算中削减了 25% 将

交通预算削减了 1/3 我想

你可以称之为大胆 我会称之为

短视

然后正如我所说的那样有根本的

区别 在共和党人

和我如何看待

我们的医疗保健系统中的医疗保险和医疗补助之间,他们的

基本理论是,如果我们只是将

医疗保险转变为代金券计划并将

医疗补助转变为整体拨款计划,那么

现在您将成为医疗保险接受者

而您

我会购买你能找到的最好的保险,

而且你会控制成本,

因为你会说

保险公司这就是我能负担得起的

将控制成本,除非您

生病并且您购买的保单

不涵盖您所拥有的,那么

您将抵押您的房屋

或您将去急诊室,

在这种情况下,我确实有保险

您将不得不间接为此付出代价,

因为医院

将提供无偿护理,因此他们并不

真正希望使医疗保健

系统更高效,更便宜,

他们想要做的是推高

医疗保健通货膨胀的成本 给你,然后

你就靠自己试图

在市场上弄清楚如何让

医疗保健更便宜问题是

你只是一个人现在你在

Facebook 工作它是一家足够大的公司

Facebook 可能可以与

保险公司谈判 和供应商为

您带来一笔不错的交易,但是如果您是一家

初创公司,如果您是车库

后面的企业家,那么

祝您好运,尝试自己获得

保险,如果

您是 一个年纪大一些的人

预先存在的条件

保险公司不会接受您,所以我们

所说的是,让我们确保而不是仅仅

将成本推给

没有任何谈判能力的人,他们没有任何

谈判能力来改变

供应商的运作方式或医院的方式 或

医生操作保险公司的

运作方式

让我们确保我们有一个

既适用于医疗保险,也适用于

目前没有健康

保险的人的系统,他们可以成为一个

大池的一部分,他们可以协商

改变医疗保健系统的运作方式

所以它更有效 所以它更

有效 让你得到更好的护理

让我们的感染率降低,

例如在医院 降低

再入院率 让我们

更有效地照顾慢性病患者

减少不必要的

测试这就是你省钱的方式

政府会省钱但你

也会省钱所以我们认为这是一个

更好的方法现在他们会

说是 好吧,您知道那永远

行不通,因为它是政府强加的

,是官僚主义的,这是政府的

接管,它们是死亡小组,我

您知道我仍然不完全

了解整个死亡小组的概念,

但我猜他们是什么 说是

某种偏远的官僚会以某种方式

为您决定您的医疗保健

我们要说的是,如果我们有医疗

保健专家医生和护士以及

正在帮助设计医疗保险

如何更智能地运作的消费者,那么我们就

不必从根本上 改变医疗保险,所以是的,

我认为可以公平地说他们的

愿景是激进的,不,我认为这不是

特别勇敢,因为

我要说的最后一点是,没有什么

比在穷人或穷人的支持下解决问题更容易的了。

无能为力或没有

说客或没有影响力的人

我认为这不是特别

勇敢 他问我

坚信教育是

最大的均衡器,有这么多问题

困扰着我们当前的系统是否有

可能对满足现代学生需求的系统进行彻底改革

,在你加入之前

,我只想说如果有人

花了很多时间研究

关心这个的教育我

认为他们对你们所做的顶级事情的竞争是

你们政府所做的最被

低估和最重要的

事情之一

我很欣赏这是

一个实际上我 认为你已经看到

各方实际上走到了一起,并且

两党正在做一些很好的工作。

过去

围绕教育的争论总是

围绕左派说我们只需要更多的钱

,而右派说我们应该

炸毁这个系统,因为 公立学校

做得不好,你

现在说的是人们没有认识到

我们既需要钱又需要

改革 非此即彼的命题,这是一个兼而有之的

命题,所以马克刚刚提到的

东西叫做争冠非常

简单的概念,大多数联邦资金是

通过一个公式分配的,你知道

你是否有一定数量的穷孩子,

或者你有

你的学区有一定数量的残疾孩子有一个

公式,你

在每个州和每个学

区都得到一定数量的钱,

根据公式我们所做的就是我们拿了

大约百分之一的教育总支出

和 我们说要得到这 1

% 向我们表明你正在

改革系统,这几乎就像一个

竞争模式,所以每个州

每个学区都可以申请,

你必须向我们展示你有一个很好的

计划来重新培训教师

招聘和 进行良好的专业

发展,这样我们就可以找到最好的

老师 你必须有责任心

你必须向我们展示你

实际上在学校里取得了进步

,而且你很卑鄙 通过数据

确保您正在进入

最难到达的学校,因为全国

大约有 2,000 所学校

我们国家辍学的大部分,就像

辍学工厂一样,向我们展示一个计划

走进那些学校,真正产生

巨大的影响

,发生的事情是,40 多个

州在争夺

这笔额外资金的过程中最终启动了

可能

是我们这一代人见过的最有意义的改革,因此产生

了巨大的变化 即使

那些最终没有真正

赢得比赛的州仍然做出

改变,提高

学校取得良好成绩的潜力,所以

是你看到一些民主党人和一些

共和党人接受的那种创造性方法,我们希望我们

可以建立在我们知道的几件事的基础上,

对良好的教育最重要的是确保

我们有一位好老师 在

那间教室前面,因此

为教师招募最优秀

和最聪明的教师提供更多支持,

确保他们得到补偿,同时

确保他们的表现

非常重要,另一件事是良好的

数据,以便有持续的反馈

不仅仅是一堆标准化的测试

,或者人们可能

会为了

不受到惩罚而进行同性恋测试

孩子并

说你知道这个孩子

在数学上落后了什么 这里有一些方法

可以提高他们的表现 所以我们

开始看到实际的

进步 我很乐观我们

实际上可以在 2012 年大选

之前 一部联邦教育法

,它将

体现

我们所拥有的关于如何启动良好

学校改革的一些最佳信息 现在最后一点我将

针对本届政府提出 一个人做不到

每次我来到

硅谷时,我都会受到启发,但

也让我感到沮丧的

是,这里有多少聪明人,但也很沮丧,因为

我总是听到关于我们如何做得到的故事。

没有找到足够的工程师 我们找不到

足够的计算机程序员 你

知道这意味着我们的教育系统

没有按应有的方式工作而且

必须尽早开始 这就是我们

强调数学和科学的原因 这就是

我们强调教女孩的原因

这就是为什么我们要强调

确保黑人和西班牙裔

孩子获得数学和科学知识

顺便说一下

,很长一段时间以来,我们在白宫举办了第一次科学博览会,

只是因为我们想开始让

科学变得更酷我希望每个人都有

同样的感受,我

希望人们也有同样的感受

你知道下一个b ig 能源

突破或贝克下一个

互联网

大突破 正如我说的,

我们单靠政府是

做不到的,美国文化必须发生转变,

我们再次屈服

,我们说这些东西很重要,

这就是为什么我标记你

正在为新工作做的工作

例如,像你这样的人知道盖茨

基金会在慈善投资方面所做的

工作,教育最佳实践,

尤其是数学和

科学培训,这将非常

重要,我们必须提升我们的比赛有一个

提升 当谈到

数学和科学技术时,

希望这

是我作为美国总统可以拥有的最重要的遗产之一,

所以下一个来自

这里的另一位 Facebook 员工,所以

他们是詹姆斯米切尔

所以詹姆斯米切尔你从哪里来,

詹姆斯贝克尔嗨先生。

总统,

嘿,詹姆斯·米切尔,出生于芝加哥,

在加利福尼亚州库比蒂诺长大,

我还有另一个问题要问你,

关于债务和医疗保健,

所以我们面临的最大财政威胁

是医疗保健成本的上升,

不幸的是很多解决方案 我们

在这里的医疗保险和医疗补助

实际上并不涉及减缓

医疗保健成本的上涨,而是

涉及将成本转移到受益人

和州,所以我的问题是你能

多谈谈

《平价医疗保健法案》中的哪些规定

旨在 减缓医疗

保健费用的上涨以及您希望

在未来制定哪些政策以

继续减缓医疗保健

费用的上涨让我给您

举几个例子,因为

您的描述完全正确 我不想

把医疗保健成本转移

到美国人身上 我想真正

降低医疗保健成本 让

我们以健康 IT

为例 Valley,所以我们现在可以谈论 IT 的

东西了 上次

你们去医生办公室或

牙医办公室时,还有多少

人喜欢在剪贴板上填写表格

,原因

是因为我们的

供应商系统有很大一部分不是自动化的,所以结果

如何 发生的情况是你可能会去看

你的初级保健医生 他工作过他

做了一些基本检查 他看到一些

令人担忧的事情 他将你推荐给专科医生

你去找专科医生 他会再做

一次检查

你被收费或你的

保险公司 收取这

两项测试的费用,而不是通过电子邮件将

您的初级保健医生

进行的测试通过电子邮件发送给专家,或者

更好的是,如果事实证明

可能涉及三到四名专家,

因为这是一个困难的

诊断 这都是假设您

看起来很健康,但是假设

有一群专家,

如果您在第一次见到初级保健医生时将所有专家与初级保健医生一起聚集在一起,那么理想的情况是

这样您就不用付钱了

多次访问和多次

测试现在不是这样运作的

,其中一部分是技术,所以

我们在平价医疗法案中

所做的建立在我们对恢复法案所做的基础上,

试图为提供者提供激励,

让他们开始获得集成自动化

系统,这很困难,因为

个别医生可能会对他们说他或

她自己我不想投入昂贵的初始

资本支出,

即使它可能会在以后使我的系统更有

效率,所以提供一些

激励措施,为前端提供一些帮助

为社区医院

或个人提供者进行投资,以便我们可以

慢慢使这个系统更有效

,这是我们知道的第一要务,我们知道

可以通过 surprisin 的方式完成

在这方面做得最好的医疗保健系统

实际上是退伍军人管理局

VA 医疗保健系统,因为它是一个

完全集成的系统,

你知道每个人都在为 VA 工作

所有医生 所有医院

所有提供者 所以他们 已经能够

实现巨大的成本节省,因为

每个人都在一个单一的系统上,

虽然我们如何报销医生以及

我们如何报销医院,所以现在

发生的情况是,如果你已经参加了这两项

测试,如果你

足够大有资格获得 医疗保险很好,

每个医生都把账单寄给医疗保险

,医疗保险支付两份账单,

假设你最终做了手术,

他们会为此寄账单,所以

医疗保险支付,假设他们

做得不好,或者你

在医院生病了,你被重新入院,

你必须再次接受治疗,他们

必须重新做手术

Medicare 然后被收取第二次

手术的费用,我的意思是想象 如果这就是

你买车时的工作方式,所以

你去一周后

买车,汽车坏了,你回到

经销商那里,他们要求你修理

他们一开始做的坏工作

好吧,这就是 Medicare 一直在

做的事情,所以我们不为绩效提供奖励,

我们只是提供我们只

为您知道的合格项目的数量付费

要做的

就是开始改变人们的

报销方式让我们去一家医院,我们

想让这种类似的比赛达到

顶峰马克在

教育方面所说的话,

如果你做得很好,我们希望能够对医院说

降低医院感染率,

每年在美国造成数万人死亡,是

导致再入院率的一个重要原因,我们

知道医院

可以通过简单的协议大幅降低这些再感染率

员工正在

洗手以及他们如何

从一个房间移动到另一个房间等等

,如果

我们可以对医院说,您将获得

奖金,那么医疗保险将报销

您实施这些简单

程序的费用。 节省了整个系统的

资金,这就是我们

在“平价医疗法案”中试图做的就是开始将

这些新系统制度化,但这需要时间,

因为我们知道我们有一个

私营部门系统,它不像

VA 它是 一群个体医生

你知道的个体医院

分布在全国各地,拥有私人

保险公司,所以这不是我们

可以在一夜之间完成的事情,我们希望

在未来五年内,我们

能够通过这些机制节省大量资金

,并且 将拯救每个人,

而不仅仅是医疗保险和

医疗补助的人 它会为每个人节省金钱,

包括 Facebook 的人们,因为

你知道我确信你们提供

健康保险,我怀疑 等等,如果你

看看你的健康保险账单,他们

不会让你开心,

好吧,所以我们只有时间

再问一次,这是

来自德克萨斯州休斯顿的特里·阿特沃特的问题,如果你

在前四个期间必须做任何不同的事情

几年

会怎样 才两年半 所以

我相信我会在

接下来的一年半里犯更多的错误 陪审团仍然

会出局 你知道有各种各样

的日常 我对自己说的问题

哦,你知道我说的不对,或者我

解释得不够清楚,

或者如果我已经排序,你首先知道这个

计划而不是那个计划,也许

它会更快地完成医疗

保健 显然这是一场巨大的战斗,

如果不是因为南希佩洛西和她

在众议院的领导,以及

你所知道的伟大工作以及苏和我的康达和

其他人,如果没有,我们就不会

完成它 在国会工作不是很好,

但我确实认为

它是 如此复杂,以至于在

某个时候人们才开始说,

呃,这是典型的华盛顿争吵

,你知道我曾经问过自己

,有没有一种方法可以让

我们更快地完成它,并且以

美国人民的方式 不会

因为我不确定我能不能做到而感到如此沮丧,

因为

一百年来没有完成

它是有原因的

作为我们的医疗保健系统,我

可以告诉你,我认为

回答这个问题的最佳方式是我觉得

我仍然需要完成哪些工作,我仍然

感到非常紧迫

以平衡的方式控制赤字和债务

我觉得

在我担任总统期间需要发生 我不想

把它留给下一任总统

移民 我提到的事情我们

还没有完成 这是我非常关心的事情

这是正确的事情

为了我想去的国家

在我担任能源总裁期间没有这样做 你知道我们

今天没有谈论太多关于能源

但你首先知道每加仑 4 美元的

汽油真的伤害了这个国家的很多人

这不是因为它们是

浪费而是如果你 “开车 50 英

里去上班,这是你唯一能

找到的工作,而且你买不起一些混合动力车,所以

你被困在你开车四处行驶的旧打浆机上,

每加仑汽油能得到 8 英里,这些汽油价格正在

扼杀 你

现在,所以这就是为什么

我说

投资新的能源方法对

我们来说非常重要,我们必须有一个长期的计划,这

意味着投资太阳能和

风能投资生物燃料 投资

清洁汽车技术意味着

将联邦车队 100%

改用节能汽车,因为我们是一个

巨大的做市商,显然你知道

事实证明,我作为总统拥有很多汽车

,你知道我们是否” 在

那里购买电动汽车和

混合动力车 你知道这有助于刺激

需求并压低价格

继续提高汽车的燃油效率标准

增加石油产量,但

我的意思是,这些都是

非常重要的,顺便说一句,我们可以

为此付出代价 我们

失去了财政部

每年因对石油公司的补贴而损失 40 亿美元

现在想想看,

前五名石油公司在过去五年中

每年的收入在 750 亿到 1250 亿美元之间,

没有人

比埃克森公司做得更好,没有人

比壳牌公司做得更好 或者这些其他

公司,他们做得很好,他们

赚钱

很好

我们所说的是为什么我们

不能取消对表现出色的石油公司的税收减免

并将其投资于

可以帮助我们拯救

地球的新能源

因此,在能源方面,

在移民方面,在以

平衡和明智的方式控制赤字方面,在

改善我们的数学和科学

教育方面,在对

我们刚刚获得的基础设施进行再投资方面 还有很多

工作要做,我想我的结束

评论只是我希望

这里的每个人都不要

对我们的民主感到沮丧和愤世嫉俗

我的意思是这令人沮丧 上帝

知道这令人沮丧 我知道你们中的

一些人 谁可能在 2008 年

参与了竞选活动或精力充沛

,您知道您对

Kasia 没有足够快地完成任务感到沮丧,而且

似乎每个人都在争吵,

只要记住我们在

我们之前经历过更艰难的时期 经历

总是出现优异,我们总是

出现在顶部,

因为我们仍然获得

了世界上最好的大学,我们仍然

有世界上最富有成效的工人,

这仍然是最动力的

入口 世界上的创新文化 如果

我们走到一起,我们可以解决所有这些

问题,但我自己做不到

唯一的方法是,如果你们所有人

仍然参与,仍然参与,距离

选举日还没有那么久

我们经历了一些非常

艰难的时期 我们仍然完成了很多

工作 我们仍然能够让

经济复苏 我们仍然能够

通过医疗保健 我们

仍然能够投资 在清洁能源方面,

我们仍然能够确保

我们推翻不问不说我们

仍然确保我们在最高法院获得了女性

我们已经取得了进展所以而不是

气馁我希望每个人

无论您的政治派别如何,

您都愿意加倍努力并更加努力工作,尤其是

您这一代的年轻人,如果您

不给我们推动力,如果您不

给系统一个推动力,那就不是 会

改变,你将成为

最终的人 承担后果,

但如果你支持它,如果你

把你

在 Facebook 投入的精力和想象力投入到政治

进程中,我向你保证,没有什么是

我们无法解决的,谢谢马克

[掌声]

[音乐]