ENGLISH SPEECH JENNIFER LAWRENCE AntiCorruption English Subtitles

We are witnessing a total political system
failure in America.

If you’re anything like me you may find
yourself constantly overwhelmed by everything

that’s wrong with politics.

And when I say politics I’m not talking
about Democrats or Republicans.

I’m talking about the flaws that exist in
our political system regardless of which party

is in power.

And I know, it’s hard to talk about politics
these days, but look: The government is ours.

We pay for it, so it needs to work for us.

And right now it doesn’t.

And I mean it really doesn’t.

So, what’s going on here?

Is it Russian meddling and social media?

Is it him?

Is it her?

No.

Those two were the least popular presidential
candidates since they began keeping track

of such things.

Only 4% of Americans have a great deal of
confidence in Congress now.

Just 4%.

America is no longer even considered a full
democracy.

We are witnessing total political system failure
in America.

Which is the complete opposite of what our
nation’s founders had in mind.

So I’m going to show you three lines that
show what’s causing this failure, how we

can fix it, and what you can do about it.

So, here’s your first line.

What I want you to do is take any issue you
really care about and picture it on this line.

This line comes from a Princeton University
study that shows how public opinion influences

the laws that Congress does or doesn’t pass.

They looked at eighteen-hundred public opinion
polls over a twenty-year period, and we took

their data and plotted it in this chart.

See this horizontal line?

That shows public support for a law amongst
average Americans.

This vertical line?

That shows the likelihood of the public support
leading to the passage of a law.

When you plot it for the average American,
you get a line that looks like this.

There’s your issue sitting on that line.

If there is zero support for a law, there’s
about a 30% chance that Congress is going

to pass it.

And if there’s 100% support for something,
the most popular thing ever, there’s still

a 30% chance that Congress is gonna pass it.

So the line is horizontal because no matter
how much support there is among average Americans,

there’s still a 30% chance that Congress is
gonna pass that law.

Princeton determined that the “preferences
of the average American appear to have only

a minuscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant
impact on public policy.”

How in the hell does this happen?

Consider this.

Politicians are spending up to 70% of their
time raising funds for re-election after they

get into office.

Why?

Because in order to win a seat in the Senate
in some races, you would have to raise $45,000

every single day, 365 days a year for 6 years
to raise enough money to win.

Now consider that only .05% of Americans give
more than $10,000 to politics, and then you

see why politicians have become completely
dependent on that .05% of Americans (billionaires

and special-interest groups!) who fund their
campaigns.

Meanwhile, you’ve got lobbyists writing our
laws and donating to the politicians who pass

them, we have a two-party duopoly of Democrats
and Republicans that makes it so that independents

can’t win, while the American people are leaving
the major parties in droves.

As you can see here, nearly half of American
voters are now registered independent.

And then there’s gerrymandering, with politicians
drawing the boundaries of their own voting

districts into crazy shapes designed to prevent
competition.

Today only 14% of House campaigns are actually
competitive.

86% of them are not.

And we wonder why young people feel that their
vote doesn’t matter.

I’ve covered a lot here, but it all adds up
to this vast ring of influence over our elected

leaders.

It’s a corrupt system in which “We the
people” have “near zero” influence over

our own government…

And that.. is sad….

That is not the country I feel like I grew
up in.

But what’s worse is that by allowing this
to happen we are causing the failure of the

most important issues facing our nation.

We’re wasting trillions of dollars a year
on fraud and abuse in our own government.

One in five American children live in poverty.

Our healthcare is the most expensive in the
world.

We have more people in prison per capita than
Russia and China.

We’re losing jobs to the rest of the world.

And we’re not even doing enough to keep our
air and our water clean for our children.

America was founded on the promise of self
governance.

But instead we have statistically non-significant
impact on public policy.

So, first of all, the US Constitution gives
states sole control over how elections are

run — even federal elections — so when
we fix gerrymandering or election laws, that

fixes the federal election in each state.

That means that by going state-by-state, we
have an immediate impact on how we elect Congress

and how we hold them accountable.

But there’s more… and that brings us to
our second line.

This line is from a Bloomberg News study.

It finds that throughout American history,
passing state laws leads to federal victory.

Let me show you what I mean.

This chart shows the number of states over
time that passed laws giving women the right

to vote.

When it hits the right side of the chart,
that’s the federal victory.

Okay, now I want you to watch the blue line.

We’re gonna do this again with interracial
marriage.

There were a few states in the Northeast that
made it legal, decades ago, and centuries

go by and we hit this blue line where all
of a sudden there’s a rush of activity, which

leads pretty quickly to federal passage.

So here we are again, with same-sex marriage.

One state, Massachusetts, for many years.

A couple decades later we hit that blue line:
a jump in state activity and federal passage.

This isn’t about these issues.

This is about a winning political strategy.

The crucial finding in the Bloomberg study
is that a “key event, often a court decision

or a grassroots campaign reaching maturity,
triggers a rush of state activity that ultimately

leads to a change in federal law.”

So, fixing this problem IS possible.

But how do we create our trigger moment for
this issue?

Well, the “Grassroots Campaign” from the
study?

That’s RepresentUs.

We’re bringing conservatives and progressives
together to pass Anti-Corruption laws all

across America, using three strategic innovations:
right-left coalitions, calling out corruption

and building a movement.

A big movement.

And I’m gonna break them down for you.

Can I do this part?

No.

First, right-left.This is how people self-identify
in America.

This isn’t party identification, this is how
you feel politically.

And as you can see, its 25% liberal, 36% conservative,
and 34% moderate.

But for the past 40 years, on the reforms
I’ve outlined, it’s liberals speaking to

liberals, using liberal language, with liberal
messengers…..

Liberal….

I just had to say that one more time.

And you’re just not gonna change the political
power structure of America with 25% of the

people.

Fixing corruption requires that we enlist
all Americans, liberals, conservatives, and

moderates who, as we’ve shown, overwhelmingly
support reform.

Number two, corruption.

When we talk about money in politics, gerrymandering,
democracy, campaign finance reform…

most people just tune out, but people are
fired up about corruption.

And number three, we must build a movement.

A big movement comprised of all kinds of people
from all across America, fighting to pass

anti-corruption laws, and then make sure they
are implemented and protected.

So again, liberals and conservatives working
together, corruption, and build a movement.

This is the foundation of RepresentUs.

We believe the government should work for
every American, not just a handful of billionaires

and special-interests.

But it’s not just an idea.

In a few years, we’ve already racked up 85
wins all across the country.

And if we can get those 85 wins to 850 wins,
we can fix our corrupt political system, save

America, and get to work on fixing everything
else that’s broken in our country.

This is how we build this movement big enough
to trigger that “rush of state activity

that leads to a change in federal law….”

And that brings us to our last line.

Right now this is you and right now these
are all of the ways that you can help us go

state-by-state, city-by-city to fix the corruption
in American politics.

Volunteer and join a RepresentUs Chapter — or
if that’s not your thing, join the Common

Wealth to make a monthly donation in support
of someone who does volunteer.

100% of your money goes straight to passing
these laws.

Not to overhead or our expenses.

Every voice matters.

Your voice matters.

If you do nothing, nothing changes.

But if we all do a little.

We can win, together.

So the only question left is this…

Will you cross that line?

Join us at www.Represent.Us

我们正在目睹美国政治体系的彻底
失败。

如果您像我一样,您可能会发现
自己经常被

政治上的所有问题所淹没。

当我说政治时,我不是在
谈论民主党人或共和党人。

我说的是
无论哪个政党执政,我们的政治制度都存在缺陷

而且我知道,现在很难谈论
政治,但请看:政府是我们的。

我们为它付费,所以它需要为我们工作。

而现在它没有。

我的意思是它真的没有。

那么,这里发生了什么?

是俄罗斯干预和社交媒体吗?

是他吗?

是她吗?

。自从他们开始跟踪此类事情以来,这两个人是最不受欢迎的总统
候选人

现在只有 4% 的美国人
对国会充满信心。

只有4%。

美国甚至不再被认为是一个完全
民主的国家。

我们正在目睹美国政治体系的彻底
失败。

这与我们
国家创始人的想法完全相反。

因此,我将向您展示三行代码,
说明导致此故障的原因、我们

如何修复它以及您可以采取哪些措施。

所以,这是你的第一行。

我想让你做的就是把你
真正关心的任何问题都放在这条线上。

这条线来自普林斯顿大学的
一项研究,该研究表明公众舆论如何

影响国会通过或不通过的法律。

他们查看
了 20 年间的 1800 次民意调查,我们将

他们的数据绘制在这张图表中。

看到这条水平线了吗?

这表明公众对普通美国人的法律的支持

这条垂直线?

这表明公众支持
导致法律通过的可能性。

当你为普通美国人绘制它时,
你会得到一条看起来像这样的线。

你的问题就在那条线上。

如果一项法律的支持率为零,
那么国会通过它的可能性约为 30%

如果某件事得到 100% 的支持,这
是有史以来最受欢迎的事情

,国会仍有 30% 的机会通过它。

所以这条线是水平的,因为无论
普通美国人有多少支持

,国会仍有 30% 的
机会通过该法律。

普林斯顿确定“
普通美国人的偏好似乎对公共政策

只有微不足道的、接近于零的、统计上不显着的
影响。”

这到底是怎么发生的?

考虑一下。

政客上任后花费高达 70% 的
时间为连任筹集资金

为什么?

因为为了
在某些竞选中赢得参议院席位,你必须在

6 年内每年 365 天每天筹集 45,000 美元,
才能筹集到足够的钱来获胜。

现在考虑一下,只有 0.05% 的美国人
为政治捐款超过 10,000 美元,然后你就会

明白为什么政客完全
依赖于为他们的竞选活动提供资金的那 0.05% 的美国人(亿万富翁

和特殊利益集团!)

与此同时,游说者编写我们的
法律并向通过法律的政客捐款

,我们有民主党和共和党的两党双头垄断,
这使得独立人士

无法获胜,而美国人民正在
离开主要政党 成群结队。

正如你在这里看到的,近一半的美国
选民现在是独立登记的。

然后是选区划分,政客们
将他们自己的投票区的边界画

成疯狂的形状,旨在防止
竞争。

如今,只有 14% 的众议院竞选活动实际上
具有竞争力。

其中 86% 不是。

我们想知道为什么年轻人觉得他们的
投票无关紧要。

I’ve covered a lot here, but it all adds up
to this vast ring of influence over our elected

leaders.

这是一个腐败的系统,在这个系统中,“我们
人民”对我们自己的政府的影响力“接近于零”

……

而且……这……很可悲……

那不是我觉得我长大的国家

但更糟糕的是,通过允许
这种情况发生,我们正在导致

我们国家面临的最重要问题的失败。

我们每年
在自己政府的欺诈和滥用行为上浪费数万亿美元。

五分之一的美国儿童生活在贫困中。

我们的医疗保健是世界上最昂贵的

我们人均在狱中的人数比
俄罗斯和中国还多。

我们正在向世界其他地方失去工作。

我们甚至没有做足够的工作来
为我们的孩子保持空气和水的清洁。

美国是建立在自治的承诺之上的

但相反,我们对公共政策的影响在统计上并不显着

因此,首先,美国宪法赋予
各州单独控制选举

方式——甚至是联邦选举——的权利,因此,当
我们修复选区划分或选举法时,也就

修复了每个州的联邦选举。

这意味着,通过逐州进行,我们
对我们如何选举国会

以及我们如何追究他们的责任产生直接影响。

但是还有更多……这将我们带到
了第二行。

这条线来自彭博新闻的一项研究。

它发现在整个美国历史上,
通过州法律会导致联邦胜利。

让我告诉你我的意思。

这张图表显示了随着
时间的推移通过法律赋予妇女

投票权的州数量。

当它击中图表的右侧时,
这就是联邦的胜利。

好的,现在我要你注意蓝线。

我们将通过异族婚姻再次做到这一点
。 几十年前,

东北部有几个州
将其合法化,几个

世纪过去了,我们撞上了这条蓝线,
突然之间出现了一股活动,

很快就导致了联邦通过。

所以我们又来了,同性婚姻。

一个州,马萨诸塞州,多年来。

几十年后,我们达到了那条蓝线:
州活动和联邦通道的跳跃。

这与这些问题无关。

这是关于一个成功的政治战略。

彭博研究的关键发现
是,“一个关键事件,通常是法院判决

或草根运动达到成熟,
会引发州活动的热潮,最终

导致联邦法律的变化。”

所以,解决这个问题是可能的。

但是我们如何为这个问题创造我们的触发时刻
呢?

那么,研究中的“草根运动
”?

那是代表我们。

我们正在将保守派和进步派
联合起来,在美国各地通过反腐败法

,使用三项战略创新:
左右联盟、呼吁腐败

和建立运动。

一个大动作。

我会为你分解它们。

我可以做这部分吗?

不。

首先,左右。这就是美国人的自我认同方式

这不是政党认同,这是
你在政治上的感受。

正如你所看到的,它的自由派占 25%,保守派占 36%,
温和派占 34%。

但是在过去的 40 年里,在
我概述的改革中,自由主义者与自由主义者交谈

,使用自由主义语言,与自由主义
信使……

自由主义……

我只好再说一遍。

而且你只是不会改变
拥有 25% 人口的美国的政治权力结构

解决腐败问题需要我们招募
所有美国人、自由派、保守派和

温和派,正如我们已经表明的那样,他们压倒性地
支持改革。

第二,腐败。

当我们谈论政治中的金钱、选区划分、
民主、竞选财务改革时……

大多数人只是置之不理,但人们
却对腐败感到愤怒。

第三,我们必须发起一场运动。

一场由来自美国各地的各种人组成的大型运动
,为通过

反腐败法律而奋斗,然后确保它们
得到实施和保护。

再一次,自由派和保守派
一起工作,腐败并建立运动。

这是代表我们的基础。

我们认为政府应该为
每个美国人服务,而不仅仅是少数亿万富翁

和特殊利益集团。

但这不仅仅是一个想法。

几年来,我们已经
在全国范围内赢得了 85 场胜利。

如果我们能取得 85 到 850 场胜利,
我们就可以修复我们腐败的政治体系,拯救

美国,并着手修复
我们国家其他所有被破坏的东西。

这就是我们如何建立足够大的运动
以触发“

导致联邦法律变化的州活动热潮……”。

这将我们带到了最后一行。

现在这就是你,现在这些
都是你可以帮助我们

逐个州、逐个城市地解决
美国政治腐败的所有方法。

做志愿者并加入 RepresentUs 分会——或者
如果这不是你的事,加入

英联邦,每月捐款以支持
做志愿者的人。

您的资金 100% 直接用于通过
这些法律。

不是间接费用或我们的开支。

每个声音都很重要。

你的声音很重要。

如果你什么都不做,什么都不会改变。

但如果我们都做一点。

我们可以一起赢。

所以剩下的唯一问题是……

你会越过那条线吗?

加入我们 www.Represent.Us