Using would in the past and future

want to speak real english from your

first lesson

sign up for your free lifetime account

at englishclass101.com

hi everybody my name is alicia in this

lesson i’m going to talk about how to

use

wood for unreal situations in the past

and in the future i’m going to talk

about making

statements and making some information

questions

let’s get started okay i want to begin

by talking about using wood for

past situations so for

past and future situations we use would

to describe

unreal situations so unreal

means something that did not happen

in this case in the past it’s something

that did not happen

but we want to talk about maybe

something

we think in our case we might have done

if it were us in the past or we might

not have done so

we maybe want to talk about changes to

actions in the past

so these are for situations that are not

real

so they did not happen let’s look at the

positive

expression then so when we make a

positive

statement using would in the past we’re

talking about a plan

or an opinion or something similar about

an

unreal past situation so

we make a statement with a pattern like

this

we begin with subject would

have and the past participle form of the

verb

so again this is for the past use of

wood

so for example i would have called you

earlier or he would have

given you more time for example

so this have plus the past participle

verb

creates a past tense structure so this

part

this is a key difference between past

and

future uses of wood so here is how we

make a positive

statement i’ll show some examples in

just a moment some more examples

first let’s look at how to make a

negative

statement here so a negative would

express an

alternate plan or opinion for an unreal

past

situation so this means for example

something happened maybe for example i

called someone

if i use the negative form of wood

to talk about that situation and i say

i would not have called that person

i’m giving an alternate plan so this

happened

i called someone but when i’m talking

about the situation

later i might want to say that it could

have been a good idea to

change that action i would not have

called that person

so we’re talking about an alternate plan

something different so some

change to a past action so

the change did not happen but it’s so

it’s an

unreal situation it’s not true it’s not

real

but we want to describe maybe something

we might have done

differently in the past so i’ll show

some examples in just a moment

we make this by using again the subject

followed by would to make it negative we

add

not subject would not and we use the

same

have plus the past participle verb

would not have past participle verb so

in my example just now i said

i would not have called you or

he would not have come for example

when we’re using the negative form

there’s

often some kind of other information

so we’re talking about some maybe

condition

often with if so again i’ll show that in

just a moment

finally a simple pattern that you can

use

to make information questions for

past wood situations is this

our wh question begins the question

so who what where when why how

so uh our wh question begins

followed by would the subject

have again and the past participle verb

for example what would you have

done in that situation or where

would he have gone for example so

we can build very basic wood questions

about the past

with this kind of pattern now i want to

look at

a couple of pronunciation points that

deal with these

two sentence patterns first

when you’re using this positive pattern

the pronunciation becomes something like

this

subject plus this d sound

and the sound so what does this mean

here the subject the subject remains the

same

i or he or she or we for example

this d right here this

d sound is the wood so we reduce

the wood sound to d so this means

i’d heed sheed weed

vade so it’s a d sound a very quick d

sound then this v e

portion v sound comes from

have have so would

have becomes

in very fast speech idev heediv

sheedev they div we div youtube

for example dev div so

this is one big point to listen for

another thing that will tell you if this

is a past

situation a past statement is the type

of verb that’s used here

so if you’re listening to this verb as

well you can hear if the person uses a

past participle verb

in connection with this kind of

pronunciation

you know that it’s a past would

statement

not for example a future would statement

so there are a few

hints to listen for here would’ve

so there’s this v sound and then

there’s this past participle verb sound

so

this is when you’re making a situation

uh this is when it’s connecting directly

to a subject

like idev hedev sheediv

so when you’re making a this is for

positive

statements as well when you’re making a

negative

however it becomes something like this

i’ve written here wouldn’t wouldn’t so

i don’t have the subject here but we

would include

the subject here again so i wouldn’t

he wouldn’t she wouldn’t so we can

imagine

the subject remains here i did not

include it in this section because the

pronunciation of the subject

part doesn’t really connect so much as

it does with the positive

in positive sentence structures this

subject would

and have closely connect in negative

structures this connection is not

quite as strong so i wouldn’t perhaps

there’s a little bit of a connection but

not as strong

i want to focus instead here on this

part so would we can see remains the

same

so for the negative sentence would

remains the same

subject would but here

this n is the not part

this is the not part wooden wooden

so for example maybe you know wouldn’t

which i’ll talk about later

so this n sound is the not part this

a sound is the have

part i wouldn’t i would not done that

she wouldn’t have come we wouldn’t have

called

for example so this part right here

actually means not have not

have i wouldn’t she wouldn’t they

wouldn’t we wouldn’t

so this is another key difference

between the

negative form and the positive form in

your pronunciation

so you can hear it’s quite different

this is one thing to practice

of course and to listen carefully for

so with this in mind let’s look at a few

example sentences

first a positive sentence i would have

come

but i had to work i would have come

but i had to work so here

i could reduce this i’ve made this a

very clear sentence i would

have come so itev

come would probably be the way a native

speaker would pronounce this just as

i’ve introduced here

my subject is i i reduce wood

to d and i make the

sound for have so i would have

come becomes i’d have come but i had to

work

i’d have come is how it sounds let’s

look at another example with a different

subject

he would have helped but he was cooking

he would have helped but he was cooking

again my subject

he connects to the wood

word which is reduced to d and

have becomes so he’d have helped

but he was cooking he’d have helped but

he was cooking

it’s how a native speaker would say this

so what did these sentences mean

i would have come but i had to work so

in this case maybe come to an event for

example

i would have come but i had to work

so that means a past situation maybe i

wanted to come to the party i wanted to

come to the event

but i had to work so this communicates

maybe the speaker

had a desire or had a plan a plan of

some kind

to do something in the past but it did

not happen

in this case the reason is the speaker

had to work

i would have come but i had to work so

we use

would to express that you could say i

wanted to come but i had to work

that would communicate pretty much the

same idea

in this sentence he would have helped

but he was cooking

so for example maybe would have helped

cleaning maybe

cleaning a house but he was cooking so

again

in the past he in this situation

maybe could have it was possible or

maybe he wanted to help

but he was cooking there was some other

responsibility

so these are common patterns like we

want to express

a past action we might have changed but

that we were not able to do because of

some other reason let’s continue on

to a couple of negative examples now

first she wouldn’t have left

early if she had known you needed

help she wouldn’t have left early if she

had known you needed help

so here we have our subject she which i

talked about here

and then i have here wouldn’t so i

reduced

wood knot together you might see this as

well

wouldn’t wouldn’t this is wood and not

wouldn’t have to make it even more

natural

we would say she wouldn’t she wouldn’t

she wouldn’t have left early

if she had known you needed help so in

this case

she in this situation left early she did

leave early that was the situation the

true situation

but the speaker in this case wants to

explain that

she this person would not have she would

have

changed this action if

she had known this other person needed

help so perhaps this is a communication

related issue

so she maybe would have stayed

so that was the change in the action she

perhaps might have stayed

if the she here knew this third party

needed some help so wouldn’t have

this means this person did leave she did

leave

so again this is an unreal situation

so um let’s continue on to see another

example of this then we wouldn’t have

called the police

if we hadn’t thought the situation was

dangerous

again we wouldn’t or wouldn’t

we wouldn’t have called the police if we

hadn’t thought the situation was

dangerous

here we wouldn’t have called the police

this means the speaker did call the

police the speaker

did call the police so we wouldn’t have

called the police

means is or rather is attached here

because

the speaker is saying they thought the

situation

was dangerous so we would not have

called the police

so in other words we might not have

or that would not have been our plan

if we hadn’t thought the situation was

dangerous

this is a past tense part too this part

is all in past tense

so that means the speaker felt some past

situation was dangerous and they’re

saying

that’s why we called the police

if we had not thought that situation was

dangerous

we would not have called the police

so this is kind of it may seem to be a

sort of confusing way

to communicate this idea but you may

hear patterns like this from time to

time to reinforce

maybe someone’s plan or someone’s

actions

okay so let’s continue with this in mind

then let’s continue on to

looking at how to use it for future

unreal situations

when we use wood for a future unreal

situation

we’re expressing like a potential so

it’s something

that could happen there’s a possibility

a potential

action for an unreal situation in

the future so a potential action or

this can mean potentially no action

so i’ll explain with some examples here

another point about this usage we often

or usually i have here use these

in response to an if question

so if you were if he were for example

or we pair it with an if clause

so we saw this actually in these uh

negative example sentences here this is

quite common when we’re using it to talk

about

future unreal situations so first

let’s look at how to make these to make

a positive statement

we use subject plus would

plus the present tense form of the verb

so here we see a key

difference when we’re using the future

form

we’re not using have in the past we used

have

and the past participle form of the verb

here we’re using

no have there’s nothing here and the

present tense

form of the verb when we make a negative

sentence then

it’s the same we drop have and we’re

using the present

tense so there’s no change to the verb

here

in the negative form we simply add not

then when we’re making questions we

follow a similar pattern

we use our wh question who what where

when why how

plus would plus our subject and again

a present tense verb so

as we did over here with the past form

let’s look at the pronunciation points

here this is a little bit

simpler when we use a positive

statement we can use the subject plus

this apostrophe

d so i’d heed sheed weed

when we used the negative form we use

wouldn’t i wouldn’t he wouldn’t she

wouldn’t

so there are only these two to consider

let’s see how we would use these to make

some questions and answers

i included a couple of example questions

that are fairly common patterns i think

so you can see

how to make some common questions with

wood

for example what would you do

if you won the lottery what would you do

if you won the lottery the lottery

is a cash a money prize so you buy a

ticket

and there’s a chance you win a big cash

prize that’s called

a lottery what would you do

so here we see if you won the lottery

here we have this if

part so this is a future unreal

situation

it’s possible there’s maybe a low chance

of it happening

but we’re talking about your future

actions or maybe your future plans or

opinions

here so what would you do if you won the

lottery

the speaker’s response in this case i

would

buy my parents a house i would buy my

parents a house

so you’ll notice here i’m not saying if

i won the lottery

i would buy my parents a house it’s okay

to say that

but it’s also okay to drop it when we

understand the question

we don’t have to repeat the question you

can if you want to practice

but a native speaker would respond like

this and a native speaker would probably

reduce this to i’d i’d buy my parents a

house

so i’d shows it’s a future unreal

uh decision a future unreal situation

another person you might say he would

take a long vacation

so if he won the lottery he would take

a long vacation so this is the speaker’s

idea about someone else’s future plan

future unreal plan so we don’t know that

it’s going to happen

it’s kind of an idea or a guess about

someone’s

choice let’s look at another question

what would you do if you lost your job

so you can see

there’s these common what would you do

if what would you do

if type patterns and then here we have

the

unreal situation in the future

these ins sorry these answers rather

these answers

use the negative form though what would

you do

if you lost your job the speaker says

i wouldn’t spend a lot of money

i wouldn’t spend a lot of money so the

speaker’s saying

if i lost my job in the future it’s not

a real situation

if it happened my my future action

would be to not spend a lot of money i

would not spend a lot of money in that

situation

which is unreal right now but if it

happened

that’s what i would do we use wood to

talk about that possible situation

another example she wouldn’t be

happy she wouldn’t be happy so if she

lost her job

she wouldn’t be happy so that’s talking

about her condition actually so we don’t

only have to describe like our behaviors

our actions we can also talk about our

conditions our emotional or our mental

states

she wouldn’t be happy she would be upset

for example

so we can use something like this to

respond to these

if questions if and would are commonly

paired together

so this is a quick introduction to

actually a kind of

complex grammar point but i hope that it

helps you understand how to use

wood for past and future unreal

situations

if you have any questions or comments

please feel free to let us know in the

comment section of this video

of course if you like the video please

be sure to give it a thumbs up

subscribe to our channel if you haven’t

already and please check us out at

englishclass101.com

for some other things that can help you

with your english studies

thanks very much for watching this

lesson and i will see you again soon

bye bye

want to speed up your language learning

take your very first lesson with us

you’ll start speaking in minutes and

master real conversations

sign up for your free lifetime account

just click the link in the description

想从第一课开始说真正的英语

在

englishclass101.com 注册您的免费终身帐户 大家好，我的名字是艾丽西亚，在这

节课中我将讨论如何

在过去和未来的不真实情况中使用木材

我要谈谈

发表声明和提出一些信息

问题

让我们开始好吧我想

首先谈谈在

过去的情况下使用木材所以对于

过去和未来的情况我们使用

来描述

不真实的情况所以不真实的

意思是没有

在这种情况下发生在过去这是

没有发生的事情，

但我们想谈谈也许

我们认为在我们的情况下我们可能已经做过的事情，

如果是我们过去，或者我们可能

没有做过，所以

我们可能想谈谈 改变

过去的动作，

所以这些是针对不真实的情况，

所以它们没有发生让我们看一下

积极的

表达，然后当

我们在 pa 中使用 will 做出积极的陈述时 我们在

谈论一个计划

或意见或类似的关于

不真实的过去情况的东西，所以

我们用这样的模式做一个陈述，

我们以主语 would

have 和动词的过去分词形式开始，

所以这又是过去的 使用

木材，例如，我会早点给你打电话，

或者他

会给你更多的时间，

所以这个 have 加上过去分词

动词

创建了过去时结构，所以这

部分

是过去

和

未来使用木材之间的关键区别 所以这里是我们如何

做出积极的

陈述我将在稍后展示一些例子

更多的例子

首先让我们看看如何在这里做出

否定的

陈述，这样否定就可以

表达

对不真实的过去情况的替代计划或意见

所以这个 意味着例如

发生了某事也许例如我

打电话给某人

如果我使用木头的否定形式

来谈论那种情况并且我说

我不会打电话给那个人

我正在给一个交替 吃了计划所以这

发生了

我打电话给某人但是当我稍后

谈论这种情况时

我可能想说改变那个行动

可能是一个好主意

我不会

打电话给那个人

所以我们正在谈论替代 计划

一些不同的事情，所以

对过去的行动做一些改变，

所以改变没有发生，

但这是一个

不真实的情况，这不是真的，这不是

真实的，

但我们想描述一下

我们过去可能做了

不同的事情，所以我会展示

一些

稍后我们会

通过再次使用主语来实现这

一点 说

我不会打电话给你，或者

他不会来，例如，

当我们使用否定形式

时，

通常会有一些其他信息，

所以我们经常谈论一些可能的

情况

，如果是这样的话，我会 展示一下，

最后一个简单的模式，你可以

用它

来为

过去的木材情况提出信息问题，这是

我们的 wh 问题开始的问题

so who what where when what

so uh 我们的 wh 问题开始了，

然后主题

是否会再次出现 过去分词动词

，例如

在那种情况下你会做什么或者

他会去哪里，所以

我们可以用这种模式构建关于过去的非常基本的木头问题

现在我想

看看几个发音点 首先

处理这

两种句型

当你使用这种正面模式时

，发音变成类似于

这个

主语加上这个 d

音和这个声音 所以这在这里意味着什么

主语主语保持

不变

i or he or she or we 例如

这个 d 就在这里 这个

d 声音是木头所以我们

把木头声音减少到 d 所以这意味着

我会注意 sheed weed

vade 所以它的 ad 声音是一个非常快的 d

声音 n 这 ve

部分 v 声音来自

有所以会

变成非常快速的语音 idev heediv

sheedev 他们 div 我们 div youtube

例如 dev div 所以

这是一个重要的点来听

另一件事，它会告诉你这

是否是过去

过去的

陈述是这里使用的动词类型，

所以如果你也在听这个动词

，你可以听到这个人是否使用

过去分词

动词与这种

发音有关，

你知道这是一个过去会

陈述

不是 例如，未来会陈述，

所以这里有一些

提示要听

像 idev hedev sheediv

这样的主题，所以当你做一个 this 时，这也是

积极的

陈述，当你做一个

否定的时候，

但是它变成了这样的东西，

我在这里写的不会，所以

我没有 e 这里的主题，但我们

会

在这里再次包含主题，所以我不会，

他不会，她不会，所以我们

可以想象主题仍然在这里，我没有

将它包含在本节中，因为

主题

部分的发音不 t

真的与

积极句子结构中的积极联系如此之多，这个

主题

在消极结构中会并且紧密联系

这种联系不是

那么强，所以我不会，也许

有一点点联系，但

没有那么

强 想把重点放在这

部分，所以我们可以看到保持

不变，

所以否定句将

保持相同的

主语，但这里

这个 n 不是部分，

这不是部分木制的，

所以例如，也许你知道不会'

t 我稍后会谈到，

所以这个 n 声音不是部分，

这个声音是有

部分 这里

实际上 y 表示没有

没有 我不会 她不会 他们

不会 我们不会

所以这

是你发音中否定形式和肯定形式之间的另一个关键区别，

所以你可以听到它完全不同

这是一回事

练习当然要仔细听，

所以考虑到这一点，让我们先看几个

例句，

一个积极的句子我会

来

但我必须工作我会来

但我必须工作所以在这里

我可以减少这个我 ‘已经把这

句话说得很清楚，我

会来，所以 itev

come 可能是

母语人士的发音方式，就像

我在这里介绍

的那样 本来会

来变成我本来会来但我必须

工作

他连接到木头的主题

rd 被简化为 d

并且变成了所以

他会帮忙但他在做饭

工作所以

在这种情况下可能会参加一个活动例如

我本来会来但我必须工作

所以这意味着过去的情况也许我

想参加聚会我

想参加活动

但我必须工作所以这可以传达

也许演讲者

有一个愿望或计划

在过去做某事的某种计划，但

在这种情况下并没有发生，原因是演讲

者必须工作

我会来但我必须工作所以

我们使用

会 表达你可以说我

想来，但我必须工作

，在这句话中传达几乎

相同的想法

，他会帮忙，

但他正在

做饭，例如，也许会帮助

打扫卫生，或者

打扫房子，但他正在做饭 所以

又

在过去他在这个位置 ion

也许有可能，

或者他想帮忙，

但他正在做饭，还有其他

责任，

所以这些是常见的模式，比如我们

想要

表达过去的行动，我们可能已经改变了，但

由于某些原因我们无法做到

其他原因 现在让我们

继续举几个负面例子，

首先，

如果她知道您需要

帮助，她就不会早退

在这里谈过

，然后我在这里不会，所以我

一起减少了木结，你可能会看到这个，

不会，这不是木头，

不必让它更

自然，

我们会说她不会

如果她知道你需要帮助，她不会早走，所以在

这种情况下，

她在这种情况下

早退了

她这个人会

如果

她知道这个人需要

帮助，她不会改变这个动作，所以也许这是一个

与沟通有关的问题，

所以她可能会留下来，

所以

如果她在这里知道这一点，她可能会留下来的动作改变 第三方

需要一些帮助，所以不会有

这意味着这个人确实离开了，她确实

离开了，

所以这又是一个不真实的情况，

所以让我们继续看另一个

例子，

如果我们没有，我们就不会报警’ 不认为情况再次

危险

如果

我们不认为这里的情况很

危险，

我们不会或不会报警 我们不会报警

这意味着说话者确实

报警了 演讲者

确实报警了，所以我们不会

报警

意味着这里是或者更确切地说是附在此处，

因为演讲者说他们认为

情况

很危险，所以我们不会

报警，

所以在其他情况下 rds 我们可能没有，

或者如果我们不认为情况很危险，那也不会是我们的计划

这也是过去时部分 这部分

都是过去时，

所以这意味着说话者觉得过去的一些

情况很危险，他们 “

这就是为什么我们报警的原因，

如果我们不认为情况很

危险，

我们就不会报警，

所以这似乎是一种

传达这个想法的令人困惑的方式，但你可能会

听到类似的模式 这

不时地加强

也许某人的计划或某人的

行动

好吧，所以让我们继续记住这一点，

然后让我们继续

研究如何将它用于未来的

虚幻情况，

当我们将木材用于我们正在表达的未来虚幻

情况时

一个潜在的，所以

它

是可能发生的事情 有可能

对未来不真实的情况采取潜在的行动，

所以一个潜在的行动，或者

这可能意味着潜在的没有行动，

所以我会用 s 解释 这里有一些例子

关于这种用法的另一点，我们经常

或通常我在这里使用这些

来回答 if 问题，

所以如果你是如果他是例如，

或者我们将它与 if 子句配对，

所以我们实际上在这些 uh 负面示例中看到了这一点

这里的句子

当我们用它来谈论未来的虚幻情况时，这是很常见的，

所以首先

让我们看看如何使这些句子成为

一个积极的陈述，

我们使用主语加将

加上动词的现在时形式，

所以在这里我们看到一个

当我们使用将来时我们不使用的未来形式时的关键区别

过去我们使用 have

和这里我们使用的动词的过去分词形式

no have here’s nothing here 和

当我们使用动词的现在时形式时 做一个否定

句，那么

它和我们放弃的一样，我们

使用现在

时，所以这里的动词没有变化，

否定形式我们只是添加 not

然后当我们提出问题时，我们

遵循类似的模式，

我们使用我们的 什么问题 who what where

when why how

plus 会加上我们的主语

和现在时动词，所以

就像我们在这里用过去形式做的一样，

让我们看看这里的发音点

当我们使用可以使用的肯定陈述时，这有点简单

主题加上

这个撇号

d 所以

当我们使用我们使用的否定形式时我

会注意 sheed weed 不会我不会 他不会 她

不会

所以只有这两个要考虑

让我们看看我们将如何使用 这些是为了提出

一些问题和答案，

我包括了几个

我认为相当常见的模式示例问题，

因此您可以了解

如何用木材提出一些常见问题，

例如，

如果您中了彩票，您会怎么做 如果您中了彩票，您会怎么做

中了彩票 彩票

是一种现金奖励，所以你买了

一张彩票

，你就有机会赢得一个叫做彩票的大额现金

奖励

你会怎么

做 在这里我们看看你是否中了彩票

如果

部分是这样，我们有这个 这是一个不真实的未来

情况

有

可能 发生这种情况的可能性很小，

但我们在这里谈论的是你未来的

行动，或者你未来的计划或

意见，所以如果你中了彩票，你会怎么做

演讲者的回应 在这种情况下，我

会给

我父母买一个 房子我会给我

父母买房子

所以你会注意到这里我不是说如果

我中了彩票

我会给我父母买房子可以

这么说

但是当我们理解我们不知道的问题时也可以放弃

如果您想练习，就不必重复这个问题，

但是母语人士会这样回答，

而母语人士可能

会将其简化为我要给父母买

房子，

这样我就可以证明这是一个未来 unreal

uh decision a future unreal situation

另一个人你可能会说他

会放一个

长假 所以如果他中了彩票他会

放一个长假 所以这是演讲者

对别人未来计划的想法

未来的不真实计划 所以我们不知道

它正在发生 发生

它是对某人选择的一种想法或猜测

让我们看另一个问题

如果你失业了你会怎么做

这样你就可以看到

有这些常见的你

会怎么做如果你

输入模式然后在这里我们

将来有不真实的情况

这些ins对不起这些答案而不是

这些答案

使用否定形式虽然

如果你失业了你会怎么做演讲者说

我不会花很多钱

我不会花很多钱 所以

演讲者说

如果我将来失去工作，这不是

一个真实的情况，

如果发生这种情况，我未来的

行动是不花很多钱，我

不会在现在不真实的情况下花很多钱，

但是 如果

发生了

这就是我会做的，我们用木头来

谈论可能的情况

另一个例子她不会

高兴她不会高兴所以如果她

失去工作

她不会高兴所以这

实际上是在谈论她的情况 所以我们这样做

不仅要描述我们的行为

我们的行为 我们还可以谈论我们的

状况 我们的情绪或精神

状态

她不会高兴 她会不高兴

例如，

所以我们可以用这样的东西来

回答

这些问题 if 和 would 通常

配对在一起，

所以这是对

实际上一种

复杂语法点的快速介绍，但我希望它

可以帮助您了解如何在

过去和未来的虚幻

情况下使用木材

如果您有任何问题或意见，

请随时

如果您喜欢该视频，请在此视频的评论部分告诉我们，

如果您还没有订阅我们的频道

，请

务必

给它一个赞 可以帮助

您学习英语

非常感谢您观看

本课，我很快就会再见到您

再见

想加快您的语言学习

与我们一起上第一堂课，

您将开始 在几分钟内发言并

掌握真实对话

注册您的免费终身帐户

只需单击说明中的链接