ENGLISH SPEECH MATT DAMON What We Do Matters English Subtitles

It is such an honor to be part of your day.

It’s an honor to be here with you, with
your friends, your professors and your parents.

But let’s be honest this is an honor I didn’t
really earn.

I’m just going to put that out there.

I mean, I’ve seen the list of previous commencement
speakers, Nobel Prize winners, the U.N. secretary

general, president of the World Bank, president
of the United States — and who did you get?

The guy who did the voice for a cartoon horse.

If you’re wondering which cartoon horse,
that’s Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron,

a movie some of you might have grown up watching.

It’s definitely one of my best performances
as a cartoon horse.

Well, look, I don’t even have a college
degree.

As you might have heard I went to Harvard,
I just didn’t graduate from Harvard.

I got pretty close but I started to get movie
roles and I didn’t finish all my courses.

But I put on a cap and gown and I walked with
my class.

My mom and dad and brother were there and
everything, I just never got an actual degree.

So you could say I kind of fake graduated.

So you can imagine how excited I was when
President Reif called to invite me to speak

at the MIT commencement.

And then you can imagine how sorry I was to
learn that the MIT commencement speaker does

not get to go home with a degree.

So yes, for the second time in my life, I
am fake graduating from a college in my hometown.

And my mom and my dad and my brother are here
again.

And this time I brought my wife and my four
kids.

So welcome kids to your dad’s second fake
graduation.

You must be so proud.

So as I said, my mom is here.

She is a professor, so she knows the value
of an MIT degree.

She also knows that I couldn’t have gotten
in here.

I mean Harvard, you know, barely or a safety
school like Yale.

Look, I’m not running for any kind of office,
I can say pretty much whatever I want.

No, I couldn’t have gotten in here but I
did grow up here.

I grew up in the neighborhood in the shadow
of this imposing place.

My brother Kyle and I and my friend Ben Affleck,
brilliant guy, good guy never really amounted

too much.

We all grew up right here in Central Square,
the children of this sometimes rocky marriage

between this city and its great institutions.

To us, MIT was kind of like the man, this
big impressive impersonal force, at least

that was our provincial kneejerk teenage reaction
anyway.

And then Ben and I shot a movie here and one
of the scenes in Good Will Hunting was based

on something that actually happened to my
brother Kyle.

He was visiting a physicist that we knew at
MIT and he was walking down the infinite corridor.

He saw those blackboards that lined the halls.

And so my brother who’s an artist picked
up some chalk and wrote an incredibly elaborate

totally fake version of an equation.

And it was so cool and completely insane that
no one raised it for months.

This is a true story.

Anyway, Kyle came back and he said, “You
guys, listen to this.

They’ve got blackboards running down the
hall, because these kids are so smart they

just need to drop everything and solve problems”.

And it was then we knew for sure we could
never have gotten in.

But like I said, we later made a movie here
which did not go unnoticed on campus.

In fact, I’d like to read you some actual
lines, some selected passages from the review

of Good Will Hunting in the MIT school paper.

If you haven’t seen, Will was me and Sean
is played by the late Robin Williams, a man

I miss a hell of a lot.

So I’m quoting here.

“Good Will Hunting is very entertaining
but then again any movie partially set at

MIT has to be”.

But there’s more, in the end the reviewer
writes, “The actual character development

flies out the window.

Will and Sean talk, bond, solve each other’s
problems and then cry and hug each other,

after sad crying and hugging, the movie ends.

Such feel good pretentiousness is definitely
not my mug of eggnog”.

Well that kind of hurts.

But don’t worry, I know now better than
to cry at MIT.

But look, I’m happy to be here anyway.

I might still be a kneejerk teenager in key
respects but I know an amazing school when

I see it.

We’re lucky to have MIT in Boston, and we’re
lucky it draws the people that it does, people

like you from around the world.

I mean, you’re working on some crazy stuff
in these buildings, stuff that would freak

me out if I actually understood it – theories,
models, paradigm shifts.

I am going to tell you about one that’s
been on my mind: simulation theory.

Most of you’ve probably heard of this, maybe
even took a class with Max Tegmark.

But for the uninitiated, there’s a philosopher
named Nick Bostrom at Oxford.

And he has postulated if there is a truly
advanced form of intelligence out there in

the universe, it’s probably advanced enough
to run simulations of entire worlds, maybe

trillions of them, maybe even our own.

So the basic idea as I understand it is that
we could be living in a massive simulation

run by a far smarter civilization like a giant
computer game and we don’t even know it.

And here is the thing.

A lot of physicists, a lot of cosmologists,
they won’t rule it out.

I just watched a discussion online a few weeks
back, it was moderated by Neil deGrasse Tyson

of the Hayden Planetarium.

And by and large the panel couldn’t and
wouldn’t give a definitive answer.

Tyson himself put the odds at 50:50.

And I’m not sure how scientific that was
but it had numbers in it, so I was impressed.

But it got me to thinking.

What if this, all of this is a simulation.

I mean it’s a crazy idea but what if it
is.

And if there are multiple simulations, how
come we have to be in the one where Donald

Trump becomes the Republican nominee for president?

Can we like transfer to a different one?

Well, Professor Tegmark has an excellent take
on all of this.

My advice, he said recently, is to go out
and do really interesting things, so the simulators

don’t shut you down.

Now then again what if it isn’t a simulation.

Either way, my answer is the same.

Either way what we do matters, what we do
affects the outcome.

So either way, MIT, you’ve got to go out
and do really interesting things, important

things, inventive things, because this world,
real or imagined, this world has some problems

that we need you to drop everything and solve.

So go ahead and take your pick from the world’s
worst buffet.

Economic inequality, that’s a problem.

How about the refugee crisis?

Massive global insecurity, climate change,
pandemics, institutional racism, a pull to

nativism, fear-driven brains working overtime,
here in America and in places like Austria,

where a far-right candidate nearly won the
presidential election for the first time since

World War II.

Or the Brexit, for God’s sakes, that insane
idea that the best path for Britain is to

cut loose from Europe and drift out to sea.

I mean, what is Europe even going to look
like in 25 years?

And add to that an American political system
that’s failing.

We’ve got congressmen on a two-year election
cycle who are only incentivized to think short

term, and simply do not engage with long-term
problems.

And add to that a media that thrives on scandal
and people with their pants down , anything

to get you to tune in so they can hawk you
products that you don’t need.

And add to that a banking system that steals
people’s money.

It’s all right.

I’m not running for office.

By the way while I’m on this, let me just
say this to the bankers, specifically the

ones who brought you the biggest heist in
history: It was theft and you knew it.

It was fraud and you knew it.

And you know what else?

We know that you knew it.

So yeah, you sort of got away with it.

You got that house in the Hamptons that other
people paid for, as their own mortgages went

underwater.

And you might have their money, but you don’t
have our respect.

And just so you know, when we pass you on
the street and look you in the eye, that’s

what we’re thinking.

And I don’t know if justice is coming for
you in this life or the next.

But if justice does come for you in this life,
her name will be Elizabeth Warren.

All right.

So before my little banking digression, I
rattled off a bunch of big problems.

And a natural response is to tune out and
turn away.

But before you step out into our big, troubled
world, I want to pass along a piece of advice

that Bill Clinton offered me a little over
a decade ago.

Actually, when he said it, it felt less like
advice and more like a direct order.

What he said was “turn toward the problems
you see”.

You have to engage and turn towards the problems
that you see.

Except it sounded like turn towards the problems
that you see.

But when he said this to me, he literally
turned his body for emphasis towards me.

No, listen, it seemed kind of simple at the
time, but the older I get, the more wisdom

I see in this.

And that is what I want to urge you to do
today: turn towards the problems that you

see and engage with them.

Walk right up to them, look them in the eye
and then look yourself in the eye and decide

what you’re going to do about them.

Now in my experience, there’s just no substitute
for actually going and seeing these things.

I owe this insight, like many others, to my
Mom.

When I was a teenager, Mom thought it was
important for us to see the world outside

of Boston.

And I don’t just mean Framingham.

She took us to places like Guatemala, where
we saw extreme poverty up close.

And it changed my whole frame of reference.

I think it was that same impulse that took
my brother and me to Zambia in 2006, as part

of the ONE Campaign — the organization that
Bono founded to fight desperate, what he calls

stupid poverty and preventable disease in
the developing world.

And on that trip, in a small community, I
met this girl and I walked with her to a nearby

bore-well where she could get clean water.

She had just come from school.

And I knew the reason that she was able to
go to school at all is clean water.

Namely, the fact that it was available nearby,
so she didn’t have to walk miles back and

forth all day to get water for her family,
like so many girls and women do around the

world.

So I asked her if she wanted to stay in her
village when she grew up.

And she smiled and said, “No, no, I want
to go to Lusaka and become a nurse!”

So clean water — something as basic as that
— had given this child the chance to dream.

And as I learned more about water and sanitation,
I was floored by the extent to which it undergirds

all these problems of extreme poverty.

The fate of entire communities, economies,
countries is caught up in that glass of water,

something the rest of us get to take for granted.

People at ONE told me that water is the least
sexy and cool aspect of the effort to fight

extreme poverty.

And water goes hand-in-hand with sanitation.

So if you think water isn’t sexy, you should
try to get into the shit business.

But I was hooked already.

The enormity of it, and the complexity of
the issue, it just hooked me.

And getting out in the world and meeting people
like this little girl is what put me on the

path to starting Water.org, with a brilliant
civil engineer named Gary White.

For Gary and me both, seeing the world and
its problems, its possibilities heightened

our disbelief that so many people, millions,
660 million in fact, can’t get a safe, clean

drink of water or a clean, private place to
go to the bathroom.

There are more people with a cell phone than
access to a toilet on our planet.

And this heightened our determination to do
something about it.

Now you see some tough things out there.

But you also see life-changing joy.

And it all changes you.

There was a refugee crisis back in ’09 that
I read about in an amazing article in the

New York Times.

People were streaming across the border of
Zimbabwe to a little town in northern South

Africa called Messina.

Well, I was working in South Africa at the
time, so I went up to Messina to see for myself

what was going on.

I spent a day speaking with women who had
made this perilous journey across the Limpopo

River, dodging bandits on one side, crocodiles
in the river, and bandits on the other.

Every woman that I spoke to that day had been
raped.

Every single one.

On one side of the river or both.

And at the end of my time there I met a woman
who was so positive, she was so joyful.

She had just been given her papers, so she
had been granted political asylum in South

Africa.

And in the midst of this joyful conversation,
I mustered up my courage and I said, “Ma’am,

do you mind my asking: were you assaulted
on your journey to South Africa?”

And she replied, still smiling, “Oh, yes,
I was raped.

But I have my papers now.

And those bastards didn’t get my dignity.”

Human beings will take your breath away.

They will teach you so much but you have to
engage.

I only had that experience because I went
there myself.

It was difficult in many ways, but of course
that’s the point.

There’s a lot of trouble out there, MIT.

But there’s a lot of beauty, too.

And I hope you see both.

But again, the point is not to become some
kind of well-rounded, high-minded voyeur.

The point is to eliminate your blind spots
— the things that keep us from grasping

the bigger picture.

And look, even though I grew up in this neighborhood
— in this incredible, multicultural neighborhood

that was a little rough at that time — I
find myself here before you as a middle aged

American, white, male movie star.

I don’t have a clue where my blind spots
begin and end.

But looking at the world as it is, and engaging
with it, is the first step towards identifying

our blind spots.

And that’s when we can really start to understand
ourselves better and begin to solve some problems.

And with that as your goal, there’s a few
more things I hope you’ll keep in mind.

First, you’re going to fail sometimes, and
that’s a good thing.

For all the amazing successes I’ve been
lucky to share in, few things have shaped

me more than the auditions that Ben and I
used to do as young actors, where we would

get on a bus, we show up in New York, we’d
wait for our turn, we’d cry our hearts out

for a scene, and then be told, “OK, thanks.”

Meaning: game over.

We used to call it “being OK thanksed.”

Those experiences became our armor.

All right.

Now you’re thinking, great, thanks Matt.

Failure is good.

Thanks a ton.

Tell me something I didn’t hear at my high
school graduation.

To which I say: OK, I will.

You know the real danger for MIT graduates?

It’s not getting “OK thanksed.”

The real danger is all that smoke that’s
been blown up your … graduation gowns about

how freaking smart you are.

Well, you are that smart!

But don’t believe the hype that’s thrown
at you.

You don’t have all the answers.

And you shouldn’t.

And that’s fine.

You’re going to have your share of bad ideas.

For me, one was playing a character named
“Edgar Pudwhacker.”

I wish I could tell you I’m making that
up.

But as the great philosopher, Benjamin Affleck,
once said: “Judge me by how good my good

ideas are, not by how bad my bad ideas are.”

You’ve got to suit up in your armor, you’ve
got to get ready to sound like a total fool.

Not having an answer isn’t embarrassing.

It’s an opportunity.

Don’t be afraid to ask questions.

I know so much less the second time I’m
fake graduating than the first time.

The second thing I want to leave you with
is that you’ve got to keep listening.

The world wants to hear your ideas — good
and bad.

But today’s not the day you switch from
“receive” to “transmit.”

Once you do that, your education is over.

And your education should never be over.

Even outside of your work, there are ways
to keep challenging yourself.

Listen to online lectures.

I just retook a philosophy course that I took
at Harvard when I was nineteen.

You go to MIT OpenCourseWare.

Go to Waitbutwhy.com, go to TED.com.

I’m told there’s even a Trump University.

I have no earthly idea what they teach there.

But whatever you do, just keep listening.

Even to people you don’t agree with at all.

I love what President Obama said at Howard
University’s commencement last month: he

said, “Democracy requires compromise, even
when you are 100% right.”

I heard that and thought: here is a man who
has been happily married for a long time.

Not that the First Lady has ever been wrong
about anything.

Just like my wife.

Never wrong.

Not even when she decided last month that
in a family with four kids, what was missing

in our lives was a third rescue dog.

That was an outstanding decision, honey.

And I love you.

The third and last thought I want to leave
you with is that not every problem has a high-tech

solution.

Now if anybody has a right to think we can
pretty much tech support the world’s problems

into submission, it’s you.

Think of the innovations that got their start
at MIT or by MIT alums: the World Wide Web;

Nuclear fission; Condensed soup.

That’s is true, you should be proud of that.

But the truth is, we can’t science the you
know what out of every problem.

There is not always an app for that.

I mean take water again as an example.

People are always looking at some scientific
quick fix for the problem of dirty and disease-ridden

water.

A “pill you put in the glass,” a filter,
et cetera.

But there’s no magic bullet.

The problem’s just too complex.

Yes, there is definitely, absolutely a role
for science.

There’s incredible advances being made in
clean water technology.

Companies and universities are getting in
on the game.

And I’m glad to know that professors like
Susan Mercott at D-Lab are focusing on water

and sanitation.

But as I’m sure she’d agree, science alone
can’t solve this problem.

We need to be just as innovative in public
policy, just as innovative in our financial

models.

And that’s the idea behind an approach we
have at Water.org called WaterCredit.

It’s is based on Gary’s insight that poor
people were already paying for their water

and they, no less than the rest of us, want
to participate in their own solutions.

So WaterCredit helps connect the poor with
microfinance organizations, which enables

them to build water connections and toilets
in their homes and communities.

And this approach is really working, helping
4 million people so far and it’s only the

start.

Our loans are paying back at 99% and above
which is a hell of a better deal than those

bankers I was talking about earlier.

And I agree it’s still not sexy but it is
without a doubt the coolest thing I’ve ever

been a part of.

So thanks – so let me ask you this in closing:
What are you going to be a part of?

What is the problem that you’ll try to solve?

Whatever your answer, it’s not going to
be easy.

Sometimes your work will hit a dead-end.

Sometimes your work will be measured in half-steps.

Sometimes your work will make you wear a white
sequined military uniform and make love to

Michael Douglas.

All right, maybe that’s just my work.

But for all of you here, your work starts
today.

And seriously, how lucky are you?

I mean, what are the odds that you’re the
ones who are here today?

In the Earth’s 4.5 billion year run, with
100 billion people who have lived and died,

and the 7 billion of us here now, here you
are.

Yes, here you are, alive at a time of potential
extinction-level events, a time when fewer

and fewer people can cause more and more damage,
a time when science and technology may not

hold all the answers, but are indispensable
to any solution.

What are the odds that you get to be you,
right now, The MIT Class of 2016, with so

much on the line?

There are potentially trillions of human beings
who will someday exist or not, whose fate,

in large part, depends on the choices you
make, on your ideas, on your grit and persistence

and willingness to engage.

If this were a movie I was trying to pitch,
I’d be laughed out of every office in Hollywood.

Joseph Campbell himself would tell me to throttle
down and lower the stakes.

But I can’t.

Because this is a fact, this is not fiction.

This improbable thing is actually happening.

There’s more at stake today than in any
story ever told.

And how lucky you are that you’re here,
and you’re you.

And how lucky we are that you are here and
you are you.

So I hope you’ll turn toward the problem
of your choosing.

I hope you’ll turn toward the problem of
your choosing.

I hope you will drop everything, and I hope
you’ll solve it.

This is your life, Class of 2016.

This is your moment, and it’s all down to
you.

Ready player one.

Your game begins now.

Thank you.

Congratulations.

很荣幸能成为你一天的一部分。

很荣幸与您、
您的朋友、您的教授和您的父母在一起。

但老实说,这是我并没有
真正获得的荣誉。

我只是要把它放在那里。

我的意思是,我看过以前的毕业典礼
演讲者名单、诺贝尔奖获得者、联合国

秘书长、世界银行行长
、美国总统——你找到了谁?

为卡通马配音的人。

如果你想知道哪一匹卡通马,
那就是 Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron,

一部你们中的一些人长大后可能会看的电影。

这绝对是我
作为卡通马的最佳表演之一。

好吧,看,我什至没有大学
学位。

你可能听说我去了哈佛,
我只是没有从哈佛毕业。

我非常接近,但我开始获得电影
角色,但我没有完成所有课程。

但我戴上帽子和长袍,和
我的班级一起走。

我的父母和兄弟都在那里
,我只是从未获得过真正的学位。

所以你可以说我有点假毕业了。

所以你可以想象,当
Reif 校长打电话邀请我

在 MIT 毕业典礼上演讲时,我是多么兴奋。

然后你可以想象我是多么遗憾
得知麻省理工学院的毕业典礼演讲者

没有拿到学位回家。

所以,是的,这是我生命中第二次,
我假装从家乡的一所大学毕业。

我的妈妈、爸爸和弟弟
又来了。

这一次我带来了我的妻子和我的四个
孩子。

所以欢迎孩子们参加你父亲的第二次假
毕业典礼。

你一定很自豪。

正如我所说,我妈妈在这里。

她是一名教授,所以她知道
麻省理工学院学位的价值。

她也知道我
进不去。

我的意思是哈佛,你知道,几乎没有,或者
像耶鲁这样的安全学校。

听着,我不会竞选任何职位,
我想说什么就说什么。

不,我不能进入这里,但我确实在
这里长大。

我在
这个壮观的地方的阴影下长大。

我的兄弟凯尔和我以及我的朋友本阿弗莱克,
聪明的家伙,好人从来没有真正的付出

太多。

我们都在中央广场长大,

这座城市与其伟大机构之间这种有时不稳定的婚姻的孩子。

对我们来说,麻省理工学院有点像男人,这种
令人印象深刻的非个人力量,至少

那是我们省级青少年的下意识反应

然后本和我在这里拍了一部电影
,《善意狩猎》中的一个场景是基于我哥哥凯尔身上

发生的事情

他正在拜访我们在麻省理工学院认识的一位物理学家
,他正走在无限的走廊上。

他看到了那些排列在大厅里的黑板。

所以我作为艺术家的兄弟拿起
了一些粉笔,写了一个极其复杂的

完全伪造的方程式版本。

它太酷了,太疯狂了,
几个月来没有人举起它。

这是一个真实的故事。

不管怎样,凯尔回来了,他说,“
你们,听这个。

他们在大厅里摆满了黑板
,因为这些孩子太聪明了,他们

只需要放下一切来解决问题”。

就在那时,我们确定我们
永远无法进入。

但就像我说的,我们后来在这里拍了一部电影
,在校园里并没有被忽视。

事实上,我想给你读一些实际的
台词,一些从

麻省理工学院论文中的善意狩猎评论中选择的段落。

如果你没看过,威尔就是我,肖恩
是由已故的罗宾威廉姆斯扮演的,

我非常想念这个人。

所以我在这里引用。

“善意狩猎非常有趣,
但任何部分以

麻省理工学院为背景的电影都必须如此”。

但还有更多,最后评论者
写道,“实际的角色发展

飞出窗外。

威尔和肖恩交谈,联系,解决彼此的
问题,然后哭泣并拥抱,

悲伤的哭泣和拥抱后,电影结束。

这种自命不凡的感觉绝对
不是我的蛋酒”。

嗯,那种疼。

不过别担心,我现在知道
在麻省理工学院哭比哭更好。

但是看,无论如何我很高兴来到这里。

在关键方面,我可能仍然是一个下意识的少年,
但当我看到它时,我知道一所很棒的学校

我们很幸运在波士顿拥有麻省理工学院,我们很
幸运它吸引了

像你这样来自世界各地的人。

我的意思是,你正在这些建筑物中研究一些疯狂的
东西,

如果我真的理解它会吓到我的东西——理论、
模型、范式转变。

我要告诉你一个
我一直在想的:模拟理论。

你们中的大多数人可能都听说过这个,甚至可能上
过 Max Tegmark 的课。

但是对于外行来说,
牛津大学有一位名叫尼克博斯特罗姆的哲学家。

他假设宇宙中是否存在一种真正
先进的智能形式

,它可能先进到
足以模拟整个世界,可能是

数万亿个世界,甚至可能是我们自己的世界。

所以我理解的基本想法是,
我们可以生活在一个

由更聪明的文明运行的大规模模拟中,比如一个巨大的
电脑游戏,我们甚至都不知道。

事情就是这样。

很多物理学家,很多宇宙学家,
他们不会排除这种可能性。

几周前我刚刚在网上观看了一个讨论
,由海登天文馆的 Neil deGrasse Tyson 主持

总的来说,专家组不能
也不会给出明确的答案。

泰森本人将赔率定为 50:50。

我不确定这有多科学,
但里面有数字,所以我印象深刻。

但这让我开始思考。

如果这样,这一切都是模拟。

我的意思是这是一个疯狂的想法,但如果
是的话。

如果有多个模拟,
为什么我们必须在唐纳德

特朗普成为共和党总统候选人的那个?

我们可以转移到另一个吗?

好吧,泰格马克教授对这一切都有很好的看法

他最近说,我的建议是
出去做真正有趣的事情,所以模拟器

不会让你失望。

再说一次,如果它不是模拟怎么办。

无论哪种方式,我的答案都是一样的。

无论哪种方式,我们所做的事情都很重要,我们所做的事情
会影响结果。

所以不管怎样,麻省理工学院,你必须
出去做真正有趣的事情,重要的

事情,创造性的事情,因为这个世界,
无论是真实的还是想象的,这个世界都有一些问题

,我们需要你放弃一切并解决。

所以继续从世界上
最糟糕的自助餐中挑选。

经济不平等,这是个问题。

难民危机如何?

大规模的全球不安全、气候变化、
流行病、制度性种族主义、

本土主义的拉动、恐惧驱动的大脑加班加点
,在美国和奥地利这样的地方,

一位极右翼候选人几乎赢得了
自世界总统选举以来的第一次总统选举

二战。

或者英国脱欧,看在上帝的份上,那种疯狂的
想法认为英国的最佳途径是

脱离欧洲并漂流到大海。

我的意思是,
25 年后的欧洲会是什么样子?

再加上一个正在失败的美国政治体系

我们有国会议员参加两年的选举
周期,他们只被激励短期思考

,根本不参与长期
问题。

再加上一个以丑闻和脱裤子的人为生的媒体,

任何能让你收听的东西,这样他们就可以向你兜售
你不需要的产品。

再加上一个窃取人们钱财的银行系统

没关系。

我不竞选公职。

顺便说一句,让我
对银行家说这些,特别是

那些给你带来历史上最大抢劫的银行家
:这是盗窃,你知道的。

这是欺诈,你知道的。

你还知道什么吗?

我们知道你知道。

所以,是的,你有点侥幸逃脱了。 当他们自己的抵押贷款

被淹没时,你在汉普顿得到了其他
人支付的房子

你可能有他们的钱,但你
没有我们的尊重。

只是让你知道,当我们在街上经过你
并看着你的眼睛时,这

就是我们的想法。

我不知道
这辈子或下辈子是否会为你伸张正义。

但如果今生正义真的为你而来,
她的名字将是伊丽莎白沃伦。

好的。

所以在我的小银行题外话之前,我
喋喋不休地解决了一堆大问题。

一个自然的反应是调出并
转身离开。

但在你踏入我们这个纷繁复杂的
大世界之前,我想传递

比尔·克林顿十多年前给我的一条建议

实际上,他说出来的时候,感觉不像是
建议,更像是直接命令。

他说的是“转向
你看到的问题”。

你必须参与并转向
你看到的问题。

除了听起来像是转向
你看到的问题。

但是当他对我说这句话时,他真的
把他的身体转向了我。

不,听着,当时这似乎很简单
,但我越长大,我就越能从中

看到智慧。

这就是我今天要敦促你做的
事情:转向你所看到的问题

并与之互动。

走到他们面前,看着他们的眼睛
,然后看着自己的眼睛,然后决定

你要对他们做什么。

现在,根据我的经验,没有什么可以
替代实际去看看这些东西。

像许多其他人一样,我把这种洞察力归功于我的
妈妈。

当我还是青少年的时候,妈妈认为
让我们看到波士顿以外的世界很重要

我指的不仅仅是弗雷明汉。

她带我们去了像危地马拉这样的地方,在那里
我们近距离地看到了极端贫困。

它改变了我的整个参考框架。

我认为正是这种冲动
在 2006 年把我和我的兄弟带到了赞比亚,

作为 ONE 运动的一部分——波诺创立的组织是
为了对抗绝望的,他称之为发展中国家的

愚蠢贫困和可预防的
疾病。

在那次旅行中,在一个小社区,我
遇到了这个女孩,我和她一起走到附近

的一口井,她可以在那里获得干净的水。

她刚从学校回来。

我知道她之所以
能够上学,完全是因为干净的水。

也就是说,事实上它就在附近,
所以她不必像世界各地的许多女孩和妇女那样整天来回走几英里

来为她的家人取水

所以我问她长大后是否想留在她的
村子里。

她笑着说:“不,不,我
想去卢萨卡当护士!”

如此干净的水——像这样基本的东西
——给了这个孩子做梦的机会。

随着我对水和卫生设施的了解越来越多,
我对它在多大程度上构成了

所有这些极端贫困问题的基础感到震惊。

整个社区、经济体、国家的命运都
被卷入了那杯水中,

而我们其他人则认为这是理所当然的。

ONE 的人告诉我,水是
消除极端贫困的努力中最不性感和最酷的方面

水与卫生设施齐头并进。

因此,如果您认为水不性感,您应该
尝试进入狗屎行业。

但我已经上瘾了。

它的艰巨性和问题的复杂
性,让我着迷。

走出世界,结识
像这个小女孩这样的人,这让我走上了

与一位名叫加里怀特的杰出土木工程师一起创办 Water.org 的道路上

对于加里和我来说,看到这个世界和
它的问题,它的可能性

让我们更加怀疑,这么多人,数百
万人,实际上是 6.6 亿人,无法获得安全、干净

的水或干净、私密的地方
去 洗手间。

在我们的星球上,拥有手机的人比
使用厕所的人还多。

这增强了我们
采取行动的决心。

现在你看到了一些艰难的事情。

但你也会看到改变生活的快乐。

而这一切都会改变你。

09 年发生了一场难民危机,
我在《纽约时报》的一篇精彩文章中读到

人们从津巴布韦边境
涌向南非北部一个

名叫墨西拿的小镇。

嗯,当时我在南非工作
,所以我去墨西拿亲自看看发生了

什么事。

我花了一天时间与那些
穿越林波波河的危险旅程的女性交谈

,她们一边躲避强盗,一边躲避
河里的鳄鱼,另一边躲避强盗。

那天与我交谈的每个女人都被
强奸了。

每一个。

在河的一侧或两者兼而有之。

在我在那里的时间结束时,我遇到了一个
如此积极、非常快乐的女人。

她刚拿到文件,所以她
在南非获得了政治庇护

在这次愉快的交谈中
,我鼓起勇气说:“女士,

您介意我问一下:
您在去南非的旅途中被袭击了吗?”

她回答说,仍然微笑,“哦,是的,
我被强奸了。

但我现在有我的文件。

那些混蛋没有得到我的尊严。”

人类会让你屏住呼吸。

他们会教你很多东西,但你必须
参与。

我只有那种经历,因为我
自己去过那里。

这在很多方面都很困难,但这当然
是重点。

麻省理工学院,那里有很多麻烦。

但也有很多美丽。

我希望你能看到两者。

但同样,重点不是要成为
某种全面的、高尚的偷窥者。

关键是要消除你的盲点
——那些让我们无法

把握大局的东西。

看,即使我在这个社区长大
——在这个令人难以置信的、多元文化的社区

,那个时候有点粗糙——我
发现自己在你面前是一个中年的

美国白人男性电影明星。

我不知道我的盲点
从哪里开始和结束。

但是,观察世界并
与之互动,是识别

我们盲点的第一步。

那时我们才能真正开始
更好地了解自己并开始解决一些问题。

以此作为你的目标,
我希望你能记住更多的事情。

首先,你有时会失败,
这是一件好事。

尽管我有幸分享了所有惊人的成功
,但没有什么

比本和我作为年轻演员的试镜更能塑造我的了
,我们

会在公共汽车上,我们出现在纽约,我们
我们会等待轮到我们,我们会

为一个场景而哭泣,然后被告知,“好的,谢谢。”

意思:游戏结束。

我们曾经称其为“好的,谢谢”。

这些经历成了我们的盔甲。

好的。

现在你在想,太好了,谢谢马特。

失败是好事。

万分感谢。

告诉我一些我在高中毕业时没有听到的事情

我说:好的,我会的。

你知道麻省理工学院毕业生的真正危险吗?

它没有得到“好的,谢谢”。

真正的危险是所有的烟雾都让
你……毕业礼服

吹得你有多聪明。

嗯,你就是这么聪明!

但不要相信向你抛出的炒作

你没有所有的答案。

你不应该。

这很好。

你会有一些不好的想法。

对我来说,一个是扮演一个名叫
“埃德加·普德瓦克”的角色。

我希望我能告诉你这是我编造
的。

但正如伟大的哲学家本杰明·阿弗莱克 (Benjamin Affleck)
曾经说过的那样:“评判我的标准是我的好

想法有多好,而不是我的坏想法有多糟糕。”

你必须穿上你的盔甲,你
必须准备好听起来像个傻瓜。

没有答案并不尴尬。

这是一个机会。

不要害怕提问。

我第二次
假毕业比第一次知道的少得多。

我想留给你的第二件事
是你必须继续倾听。

全世界都想听听你的想法——好的
和坏的。

但今天不是你从
“接收”切换到“发送”的日子。

一旦你这样做了,你的教育就结束了。

你的教育永远不会结束。

即使在工作之外,也有
办法不断挑战自己。

听在线讲座。

我刚刚重修了
我十九岁时在哈佛上过的哲学课程。

你去麻省理工学院开放课件。

去 Waitbutwhy.com,去 TED.com。

有人告诉我,甚至还有一所特朗普大学。

我不知道他们在那里教什么。

但无论你做什么,只要继续听。

甚至对你根本不同意的人。

我喜欢奥巴马总统上个月在霍华德
大学毕业典礼上

所说的话:他说:“民主需要妥协,
即使你是 100% 正确的。”

我听了心想:这是一个
幸福婚姻很久的男人。

并不是说第一夫人在任何事情上都错
了。

就像我的妻子一样。

永远不会错。

甚至当她上个月决定
在一个有四个孩子的家庭

中,我们生活中缺少的是第三只救援犬。

这是一个了不起的决定,亲爱的。

我爱你。

我想留给您的第三个也是最后一个想法
是,并非每个问题都有高科技

解决方案。

现在,如果有人有权认为我们几乎可以通过
技术支持世界上的

问题,那就是你。

想想
在麻省理工学院或麻省理工学院校友开始的创新:万维网;

核裂变; 浓缩汤。

这是真的,你应该为此感到自豪。

但事实是,我们无法科学化你
知道每个问题的原因。

并不总是有一个应用程序。

我的意思是再次以水为例。

人们总是在寻找一些科学的
快速解决方案来解决脏水和疾病缠身的问题

“放入玻璃杯中的药丸”、过滤器
等。

但没有灵丹妙药。

问题太复杂了。

是的,当然,绝对
是科学的一个角色。 净水技术

取得了令人难以置信的进步

公司和大学正在
参与这场比赛。

我很高兴知道像
D-Lab 的 Susan Mercott 这样的教授正在关注水

和卫生设施。

但我相信她会同意,单靠科学
无法解决这个问题。

我们需要在
公共政策上同样创新,在我们的金融

模式上同样创新。

这就是
我们在 Water.org 采用的名为 WaterCredit 的方法背后的想法。

这是基于 Gary 的见解,即
穷人已经在为他们的水买单

,而且他们和我们其他人一样,都
希望参与到他们自己的解决方案中。

因此,WaterCredit 帮助穷人与
小额信贷组织

建立联系,使他们能够
在家中和社区建立供水连接和厕所。

这种方法真的很有效,
到目前为止已经帮助了 400 万人,这只是一个

开始。

我们的贷款偿还率为 99% 及以上
,这比

我之前谈到的那些银行家要好得多。

我同意它仍然不性感,但毫无疑问这是
我参与过的最酷的事情

所以谢谢 - 所以让我最后问你这个问题:
你将参与什么?

您将尝试解决的问题是什么?

无论你的答案是什么,这都不
是一件容易的事。

有时你的工作会陷入死胡同。

有时你的工作会以半步来衡量。

有时你的工作会让你穿上白色
亮片军装,和

迈克尔道格拉斯做爱。

好吧,也许这只是我的工作。

但是对于在座的所有人来说,你们的工作从
今天开始。

说真的,你有多幸运?

我的意思是,你
今天在这里的几率有多大?

在地球 45 亿年的运行中,有
1000 亿人生活和死亡,

而我们现在在这里的 70 亿人,你们在
这里。

是的,你在这里,生活在一个潜在的
灭绝级事件的时代,一个

越来越少的人可以造成越来越多的破坏
的时代,一个科学技术可能

无法解决所有问题的时代,但
对于任何解决方案都是必不可少的 .


现在成为麻省理工学院 2016 届毕业生的几率有

多大?

可能有数以万亿计的
人有一天会存在或不存在,他们的命运

在很大程度上取决于你做出的选择
、你的想法、你的勇气和毅力

以及参与的意愿。

如果这是我试图推销的一部电影,
我会被好莱坞的每个办公室嘲笑。

约瑟夫坎贝尔本人会告诉我要
节流并降低赌注。

但我不能。

因为这是事实,所以这不是虚构的。

这件不可思议的事情正在发生。

今天的风险比以往任何
故事都多。

你是多么幸运,你在这里
,你就是你。

我们是多么幸运,你在这里,
你就是你。

所以我希望你能转向
你选择的问题。

我希望你能转向
你选择的问题。

我希望你放弃一切,我希望
你能解决它。

这就是你的生活,2016 届毕业生。

这是你的时刻,一切都取决于
你。

准备好球员一。

你的游戏现在开始。

谢谢你。

恭喜。