Direct Objects and Indirect Objects Differences Basic English Grammar

Want to speak real English from your first
lesson?

Sign up for your free lifetime account at
englishclass101.com

Hi, everybody.

Welcome back to Ask Alisha, the weekly series
where you ask me questions and I answer them,

maybe.

First question this week comes from Sajun.

Hi, Sajun.

Sajun says, “Hi Alisha.

What does it mean ‘damn it’ and ‘nailed
it?’

I’ve seen this several times in Hollywood
movies.”

“Damn it” is a curse word that we use
when we make a mistake or when something goes

wrong.

“I deleted the wrong file?

Damn it!”

“I hit my head on a cabinet.

Damn it!”

“I forgot my keys?

Damn it!”

“Nailed it,” however, it means that we
did something perfectly.

We did something really, really well.

It’s kind of a celebratory phrase.

This is also a really casual expression.

“I throw a basketball perfectly through
a basketball hoop.

Nailed it!”

“Your coworker does a great job on her presentation.

Nailed it!”

“Your best friend cooks something perfectly.

Nailed it!”

Thanks for the question.

Next question.

Next question comes from Ashraf.

Hi, Ashraf.

“Do we say ‘who invented the internet’
or ‘who discovered the internet?’”

Yeah, we would say “invented.”

Why?

Because generally, when we use the word “discovered,”
we’re using it for things that already existed.

Meaning, maybe we didn’t have to create that
thing.

So, this is for like natural things.

So, like plants or animals, continents, for
example.

Things that already existed.

We can say, “I discovered that thing.”

“He discovered a new species,” “She
discovered an island,” “They discovered

the cure.”

So, then, we use “invented,” on the other
hand, for things like machines.

So, something that we had to create.

It didn’t exist before but maybe we put it
together or we created something new, that’s

when we use the word, “invent.”

“Look, I invented a new machine.”

“Elon Musk wants to invent new methods of
travel.”

“She invented an amazing robot.”

So, I hope that helps a little bit, the difference
between “discover” and “invent.”

Thanks for the question.

Next question comes from Mark.

Hi, Mark.

“Hi, Alisha.

I have two important questions.”

Let’s look at number one first.

“Number one, when do I use ‘too,’ ‘as
well,’ ‘also’ or ‘either?’

What’s the difference?”

Okay, “as well” and “also” sound more
formal.

I would say, in American speech, we tend to
use “also” more at the beginning of a

phrase or at the beginning of a clause and
“as well’ might come at the end of the

clause.

It’s not a rule, not a rule, just tends to,
at least in the way that I use these words.

“Too” is the one that I use most commonly
in everyday speech.

“Either,” there are a few different uses
of “either” so I’m going to guess it which

one you mean.

But, I’m guessing you mean like, “me either”
or “me neither,” which means not me also,

not me, so that’s like a negative.

So, “me either” and “me neither,”
actually, both are used to express also not

me.

Hope that helps.

Okay, let’s go to your second question.

Your second question was, “When do I use
‘answer,’ ‘reply’ or ‘response?’

What’s the difference?”

When we’re sending and receiving communication
really, they are the same.

“Response” tends to sound more formal
than the others.

“Answer” also implies that there’s a question
asked.

So, we can use “answer,” for example,
for tests, for police interrogations, for

investigations.

When a question or an inquiry is given to
someone, we could say, “Give me your answer,”

or, “Please answer me,” or something like
that.

In general, “reply” is kind of the most
neutral, the kind of maybe most basic one.

“Response” is going to sound a little
bit more formal than “reply.”

Alright, next question.

Next question comes from Seha.

Hi, Seha.

“What is a ‘direct object’ and an ‘indirect
object?’”

Okay.

So, an indirect object is the person receiving
the direct object.

So, that means that you must have a direct
object in your sentence to have an indirect

object.

You cannot have an indirect object without
a direct object.

So, let’s look at some examples.

I’ll break it down.

“I set my dad a picture from the beach.”

So, here, the verb is “sent.”

So, what is the object that I sent?

What is the object of the verb?

In this case, it’s a picture.

So, “a picture” is my direct object.

So, who is receiving the picture?

My dad.

That means “my dad” is the indirect object
here.

So, my verb, “sent,” the thing that is
affected by the verb is “the picture.”

The person receiving the picture is my dad,
therefore, “my dad” is the indirect object

here.

Let’s look at one more example sentence here.

“He cooked a roast chicken for his girlfriend.”

So, here the verb is “cooked,” past tense,
“cook.”

What’s the thing that got cooked?

What’s the thing that was affected by the
cooking?

It’s “chicken,” “roast chicken,” to
be specific, but “a chicken.”

So, who is the person who received the roast
chicken?

His girlfriend.

So, “chicken” is the direct object.

The person who received the direct object
is the indirect object, in this case, his

“girlfriend.”

So, you need to have a direct object in order
to have an indirect object.

I hope that helps.

Thanks for the question.

Next question comes from Azad O’ Myer, Hi,
Azad.

Azad says, “Which one is correct?

‘Why are you not talking with me?’ or,
“Why are you not talking with me?’”

Actually, we would say, “Why aren’t you
talking to me?”

We use the contracted form there.

I know it seems strange, “Why are not you
talking to me?”

This is, apparently, I did a little bit of
research into it and it’s kind of an older

pattern of speaking.

But, we’ll actually use this contracted form.

We don’t use, “Why are not you speaking
to me?”

We use, “Why aren’t you?”

“Why aren’t you doing this?”

“Why aren’t you doing that?”

“Why aren’t you sleeping?”

“Why aren’t you working?”

“Why aren’t you helping her?”

So, I would recommend, “Why aren’t you blah,
blah, blah?” to ask this question to your

friend.

Next question.

Next question comes from Jack.

Jack says, “What does ‘grammatically’
mean?

Does it mean sentence structure or sentence
meaning?

Thanks.”

“Grammatically” relates to sentence structure.

So, if something is “grammatical,” it
means it follows the rules of a language.

If something is “not grammatical,” it
means it does not follow the rules of a language

in terms of sentence structure.

So, we can actually have effective communication
in sentences that are not grammatically correct.

Meaning, the sentence may not follow the rules
of the language but we can still communicate

effectively.

Hope that helped.

You can check a dictionary for more information.

Great.

So, those are all the questions that I want
to answer for this week’s episode.

Thank you very much for sending your questions,
as always.

Remember, you can send your questions to me
at EnglishClass101.com/ask-alisha.

If you like the video, please don’t forget
to give us a thumbs up, subscribe to the channel

and check us out at EnglishClass101.com for
other good English study resources.

Thanks very much for watching this episode
of Ask Alisha and I’ll see you again next week.

Bye-bye.

想从第一课开始说真正的英语
吗?

在englishclass101.com 注册您的终身免费帐户

大家好。

欢迎回到 Ask Alisha,这是每周一次的系列
,你问我问题,我

可能会回答。

本周的第一个问题来自 Sajun。

嗨,萨俊。

Sajun 说:“嗨,Alisha。

“该死的”和“搞砸了”是什么意思

我在好莱坞电影中看过好几次了
。”

“该死”是
我们在犯错或出现

问题时使用的诅咒词。

“我删除了错误的文件?

该死的!”

“我的头撞在一个柜子上。

该死的!”

“我忘记了我的钥匙?

该死的!”

然而,“成功了”,这意味着我们
做了完美的事情。

我们做了一些非常非常好的事情。

这是一个庆祝的短语。

这也是一种很随意的表达方式。

“我将篮球完美地扔进
了篮筐。

搞定了!”

“你的同事在她的演讲上做得很好。

搞定了!”

“你最好的朋友做的东西很完美。

搞定了!”

谢谢你的问题。

下一个问题。

下一个问题来自 Ashraf。

嗨,阿什拉夫。

“我们是说‘谁发明了互联网’
还是‘谁发现了互联网?’”

是的,我们会说“发明”。

为什么?

因为一般来说,当我们使用“发现”这个词时,
我们将它用于已经存在的事物。

意思是,也许我们不必创造那个
东西。

所以,这是为了自然的事情。

因此,例如植物或动物,大陆

已经存在的东西。

我们可以说,“我发现了那个东西。”

“他发现了一个新物种,”“她
发现了一个岛屿”,“他们发现

了治疗方法。”

因此,另一方面,我们将“发明”
用于机器之类的东西。

所以,我们必须创造一些东西。

它以前不存在,但也许我们把它
放在一起或者我们创造了一些新的东西,这

就是我们使用“发明”这个词的时候。

“看,我发明了一台新机器。”

“埃隆马斯克想要发明新的
旅行方式。”

“她发明了一个了不起的机器人。”

所以,我希望对
“发现”和“发明”之间的区别有所帮助。

谢谢你的问题。

下一个问题来自马克。

嗨,马克。

“嗨,艾丽莎。

我有两个重要的问题。”

我们先来看看第一名。

“第一,我什么时候用‘too’、‘as
well’、‘also’或‘either?’有

什么区别?”

好吧,“as well”和“also”听起来更
正式。

我想说,在美国演讲中,我们倾向于

在短语的开头或从句的开头更多地使用“also”,而
“as well”可能出现在从句的末尾

这不是规则,不是规则,只是倾向于,
至少在我使用这些词的方式上。

“太”是我在日常讲话中最常用的一个

“要么”,“要么”有几种不同的
用法,所以我猜

你指的是哪一个。

但是,我猜你的意思是“我不是”
或“我都不是”,这意味着不是我也是,

不是我,所以这就像一个否定词。

所以,“我要么”和“我也不”,
实际上,两者都用来表达也不是

我。

希望有帮助。

好,我们来回答你的第二个问题。

您的第二个问题是,“我什么时候使用
‘回答’、‘回复’或‘回复’?有

什么区别?”

当我们真正发送和接收通信时
,它们是相同的。

“回应”听起来
比其他的更正式。

“答案”也意味着有一个问题
被问到。

因此,我们可以使用“答案”,例如,
用于测试、警察审讯、

调查。

当有人提出问题或询问时
,我们可以说“给我你的答案”

或“请回答我”或类似
的话。

一般来说,“回复”是最
中性的,可能是最基本的。

“回应”听起来会
比“回复”更正式一些。

好的,下一个问题。

下一个问题来自 Seha。

嗨,塞哈。

“什么是‘直接宾语’和‘间接
宾语’?”

好的。

因此,间接对象是
接收直接对象的人。

所以,这意味着你的句子中必须有一个直接
宾语才能有一个间接

宾语。

没有
直接宾语就不能有间接宾语。

所以,让我们看一些例子。

我会分解它。

“我给我爸爸拍了一张海滩上的照片。”

所以,这里的动词是“发送”。

那么,我发送的对象是什么?

动词的宾语是什么?

在这种情况下,它是一张图片。

所以,“一幅画”是我的直接对象。

那么,谁在接收图片?

我的爸爸。

这意味着“我的爸爸”是这里的间接宾语

所以,我的动词“发送”,
受动词影响的东西是“图片”。

收到照片的人是我爸,
所以这里的“我爸”是间接

宾语。

让我们在这里再看一个例句。

“他给女朋友做了烤鸡。”

所以,这里的动词是“cooked”,过去式是
“cook”。

煮熟的东西是什么?

受烹饪影响的是
什么?

它是“鸡”,“烤鸡”
,具体来说,是“一只鸡”。

那么,收到烤鸡的人是谁

他的女友。

所以,“鸡”是直接宾语。

接受直接宾语的人
是间接宾语,在这种情况下,是他的

“女朋友”。

所以,你需要有一个直接宾语
才能有一个间接宾语。

我希望这会有所帮助。

谢谢你的问题。

下一个问题来自 Azad O' Myer,嗨,
Azad。

阿扎德说:“哪个是正确的?

“你为什么不和我说话?”或者,
“你为什么不和我说话?”

实际上,我们会说,“你为什么不
和我说话?”

我们在那里使用合同形式。

我知道这似乎很奇怪,“你为什么不
跟我说话?”

显然,我对此进行了一些
研究,这是一种较旧

的说话方式。

但是,我们实际上会使用这种合同形式。

我们不使用,“你为什么不
跟我说话?”

我们使用,“你为什么不呢?”

“你为什么不这样做?”

“你为什么不那样做?”

“你怎么不睡觉?”

“你为什么不工作?”

“你为什么不帮她?”

所以,我会建议,“你为什么不废话,
废话,废话?” 向您的朋友提出这个问题

下一个问题。

下一个问题来自杰克。

杰克说:“‘语法上’
是什么意思?

它是指句子结构还是句子
含义?

谢谢。”

“语法上”与句子结构有关。

因此,如果某事物是“语法的”,则
意味着它遵循语言规则。

如果某事“不合语法”,则
意味着它

在句子结构方面不遵循语言规则。

因此,我们实际上可以
在语法不正确的句子中进行有效的交流。

意思是,句子可能不
遵循语言规则,但我们仍然可以

有效地交流。

希望有帮助。

您可以查看字典以获取更多信息。

伟大的。

所以,这些都是我想
在本周的节目中回答的所有问题。

非常感谢您一如既往地发送您的问题

请记住,您可以通过 EnglishClass101.com/ask-alisha 将您的问题发送给
我。

如果您喜欢该视频,请不要忘记
给我们点赞,订阅频道

并在EnglishClass101.com上查看我们的
其他优质英语学习资源。

非常感谢您观看这一
集 Ask Alisha,我们下周再见。

再见。