What really happened during the Salem Witch Trials Brian A. Pavlac

You’ve been accused of a crime
you did not commit.

It’s impossible to prove your innocence.

If you insist that you’re innocent anyway,

you’ll likely be found guilty
and executed.

But if you confess, apologize,
and implicate others for good measure,

you’ll go free.

Do you give a false confession—
or risk a public hanging?

This was the choice facing
those accused of witchcraft

in the village of Salem, Massachusetts
between February 1692 and May 1693.

They were the victims of paranoia
about the supernatural,

misdirected religious fervor—

and a justice system that valued
repentance over truth.

Salem was settled in 1626 by Puritans,
a group of English protestants.

Life was strict and isolated
for the people of Salem.

Battles with their
Native American neighbors

and groups of French settlers
were commonplace.

People feared starvation and disease,

and relations between villagers
were strained.

To make matters worse, 1692 brought
one of the coldest winters on record.

That winter, two cousins,

9 year old Betty Parris and
11 year old Abigail Williams

started behaving very strangely.

A physician found nothing
physically wrong —

but diagnosed the girls
as under “an evil hand.”

Puritans believed that the Devil wreaked
havoc in the world through human agents,

or witches, who blighted nature,
conjured fiendish apparitions,

and tormented children.

As news swept through the village,
the symptoms appeared to spread.

Accounts describe 12 so-called
“afflicted” girls contorting their bodies,

having fits,
and complaining of prickling skin.

Four of the girls soon accused three
local women of tormenting them.

All three of the accused were considered
outsiders in some way.

On February 29th,
the authorities arrested Sarah Good,

a poor pregnant mother
of a young daughter,

Sarah Osbourne,
who had long been absent from church

and was suing the family
of one of her accusers,

and Tituba, an enslaved woman
in Betty Parris’s home

known by her first name only.

Tituba denied harming the girls at first.

But then she confessed to practicing
witchcraft on the Devil’s orders,

and charged Good and Osbourne
with having forced her.

Osbourne and Good both
maintained their innocence.

Osbourne died in prison, while Good’s
husband turned against her in court,

testifying that she “was a witch
or would be one very quickly.”

Good’s 4 year old daughter
was imprisoned

and eventually gave testimony
against her mother.

Meanwhile, Good gave birth in jail.

Her baby died, and she was convicted
and hanged shortly thereafter.

Tituba was held in custody until May,
and then released.

These three victims were
just the beginning.

As accusations multiplied,
others, like Tituba,

made false confession to save themselves.

The authorities even reportedly
told one accused witch

that she would be hanged if she did not
confess, and freed if she did.

They were not particularly interested
in thoroughly investigating the charges—

in keeping with their Church’s teachings,
they preferred that the accused confessed,

asked for forgiveness, and promised
not to engage in more witchcraft.

The court accepted all kinds
of dubious evidence,

including so-called “spectral evidence”

in which the girls began raving when
supposedly touched by invisible ghosts.

Complicating matters further,
many of the jurors in the trials

were relatives of the accusers,
compromising their objectivity.

Those who dared to speak out,
such as Judge Nathanial Saltonstall,

came under suspicion.

By the spring of 1693,
over a hundred people had been imprisoned,

and 14 women
and 6 men had been executed.

By this time, accusations were starting
to spread beyond Salem

to neighboring communities, and even
the most powerful figures were targets.

When his own wife was accused,

the governor of Massachusetts colony
suspended the trials.

Sentences were amended,
prisoners released, and arrests stopped.

Some have speculated that the girls
were suffering from hallucinations

caused by fungus;

or a condition that caused
swelling of the brain.

But ultimately, the reason
for their behavior is unknown.

What we do know is that adults
accepted wild accusations by children

as hard evidence.

Today, the Salem Witch Trials remain
a cautionary tale

of the dangers of groupthink
and scapegoating,

and the power of fear
to manipulate human perception.

你被指控犯有
你没有犯下的罪行。

证明你的清白是不可能的。

如果你坚持认为自己是无辜的,

你很可能会被判有罪
并被处决。

但是,如果你坦白、道歉
并牵连他人,

你就会得到自由。

你会做出虚假的供词——
还是冒着被公开绞刑的风险?

这是

1692 年 2 月至 1693 年 5 月期间在马萨诸塞州塞勒姆村被指控犯有巫术的人所面临的选择。

他们是
对超自然、被

误导的宗教狂热

以及一个重视悔改而非真理的司法系统的偏执狂的受害者

1626 年,一群英国新教徒清教徒在塞勒姆定居

塞勒姆人的生活严格而孤立。

与他们的
美洲原住民邻居

和法国定居者群体的战斗
是司空见惯的。

人们害怕饥饿和疾病,

村民之间的关系
很紧张。

更糟糕的是,1692 年带来了
有记录以来最冷的冬天之一。

那年冬天,两个堂兄,

9 岁的贝蒂帕里斯和
11 岁的阿比盖尔威廉姆斯

开始表现得很奇怪。

一位医生没有发现
身体上的任何问题——

但诊断出这些女孩
是在“邪恶之手”之下。

清教徒相信魔鬼
通过人类代理人或女巫在世界上造成严重破坏,这些

代理人或女巫破坏了自然,
召唤出恶魔般的幻影

并折磨儿童。

随着消息席卷整个村庄
,症状似乎开始蔓延。

账户描述了 12 名所谓的
“受折磨”的女孩,她们身体扭曲

、痉挛,
并抱怨皮肤刺痛。

其中四名女孩很快指责三名
当地妇女折磨她们。 在某种程度上,

所有三名被告都被认为是
局外人。

2 月 29 日
,当局逮捕了萨拉·古德(Sarah Good),她

是一位可怜的怀孕母亲,她
有一个年幼的女儿,

萨拉·奥斯本(Sarah Osbourne
)长期缺席教堂,

并正在起诉
她的一名原告的家人,

以及贝蒂·帕里斯(Betty Parris)家中的被奴役妇女蒂图巴(Tituba)。

只知道她的名字。

蒂图巴起初否认伤害了这些女孩。

但后来她承认自己
按照魔鬼的命令练习巫术,

并指控古德和
奥斯本强迫她。

奥斯本和古德都
坚称自己是清白的。

奥斯本死于狱中,而古德的
丈夫在法庭上反对她,

作证说她“是女巫,
或者很快就会成为女巫”。

古德 4 岁的女儿
被监禁

,最终作证
指控她的母亲。

与此同时,古德在监狱中分娩。

她的孩子死了,她被定罪
并在此后不久被绞死。

蒂图巴被关押到 5 月,
然后被释放。

这三个受害者
只是一个开始。

随着指控的增多,
其他人,比如蒂图巴,

为了自救而做出虚假的供词。

据报道,当局甚至
告诉一名被指控的女巫

,如果她不认罪,她将被绞死,如果她
认罪,就会被释放。

他们
对彻底调查这些指控并不是特别

感兴趣——根据他们教会的教义,
他们更愿意被告认罪,

请求宽恕,并承诺
不再从事更多的巫术活动。

法院接受了
各种可疑的证据,

包括所谓的“光谱证据”

,其中女孩们在
据称被看不见的鬼魂触摸时开始胡言乱语。

使事情进一步复杂
化的是,审判中的许多陪审员

是原告的亲属,
损害了他们的客观性。

那些敢于
直言不讳的人,例如法官 Nathanial Saltonstall,

受到了怀疑。

到 1693 年春天,
已有 100 多人被关押

,14 名妇女
和 6 名男子被处决。

到了这个时候,指控开始
从塞勒姆蔓延

到邻近的社区,
甚至最有权势的人物也成为目标。

当他自己的妻子被指控时,

马萨诸塞州殖民地的州长
暂停了审判。

判决被修改,
囚犯被释放,逮捕停止。

有人猜测,这些
女孩患的

是真菌引起的幻觉;

或导致
大脑肿胀的情况。

但最终,
他们行为的原因尚不清楚。

我们所知道的是,成年人
接受了孩子们的野蛮指责

作为确凿的证据。

今天,塞勒姆女巫审判仍然
是一个

关于群体思维和替罪羊的危险的警示故事

以及
恐惧操纵人类感知的力量。