How art can shape Americas conversation about freedom Dread Scott

I am a visual artist,

and I make revolutionary art
to propel history forward.

I’m going to come right out
and tell you something:

I don’t accept the economic foundation,

the social relations

or the governing ideas of America.

My art contributes to fundamental change

by encouraging an audience to address
big questions from that perspective.

Social change is hard,
but ideas matter tremendously.

When I say I’m an artist,
most people think, “Oh, he’s a painter.”

Behind me, you can see
some of the kind of work I do.

“Imagine a World
Without America” is a painting,

but I work in a range of media,

including photography,
video and performance art.

A current project,
“Slave Rebellion Reenactment,”

is going to be reenacted
on the outskirts of New Orleans

this November.

In 1989, I had an artwork that became
the center of controversy

over its transgressive use
of the American flag.

“What is the Proper Way
to Display a US Flag?”

is a conceptual work that encouraged
audience participation.

It consisted of a photo montage
that had text that read,

“What is the Proper Way
to Display a US Flag?”

Below that were books that people
could write responses to that question in,

and below that was a flag
that people had the option of standing on.

The photo montage consisted
of images of South Korean students

burning American flags,

holding signs that said,
“Yankee go home. Son of a bitch,”

and below that were flag-draped coffins
coming back from Vietnam.

People wrote long and short answers.

Thousands of people engaged with the work
in a lot of different languages.

Some of the people said,

“I’m a German girl.

If we Germans would admire
our flag as you all do,

we would be called Nazis again.

I think you do have too much
trouble about this flag.”

“I think that the artist
should be returned to his heritage,

i.e., the jungles of Africa,

and then he can shovel manure
in his artistic way.”

“This flag I’m standing on stands for
everything oppressive in this system:

the murder of the Indians
and all the oppressed around the world,

including my brother
who was shot by a pig,

who kicked over his body
to ‘make sure the nigger was dead.’

That pig was wearing the flag.

Thank you, Dread Scott,
for this opportunity.”

“As a veteran defending the flag,

I personally would never
defend your stupid ass!

You should be shot!” – US Navy Seal Team.

As you can see, people had
very strong reactions about the flag then,

as they do now.

There were demonstrations of veterans
in front of the Art Institute of Chicago.

They chanted things like,

“The flag and the artist,
hang them both high,”

evoking images of lynching.

I received numerous death threats,

and bomb threats
were phoned in to my school.

It was a very dangerous situation.

Later, President Bush called
the work “disgraceful,”

which I viewed as a tremendous honor,

and Congress outlawed the work.

(Laughter)

I became part of a Supreme Court case
when I and others defied that law,

by burning flags
on the steps of the Capitol.

That action and the subsequent
legal and political battle

led to a landmark First Amendment decision
that prevented the government

from demanding
patriotism be mandatory.

But let me back up a bit.

These people literally wanted me dead.

What I would do at this moment
would make a difference.

This is me at the exact same moment,

eight stories above that crowd.

It was supposed to be for a photo shoot

that was going to take place on the steps
where the veterans were at that time.

It wouldn’t have been safe
for me to be there, to say the least.

But it was really important
to do that shoot,

because while some wanted to kill me,
it was also a situation

where those who viewed the American flag
as standing for everything oppressive

in this system

felt that they had a voice,

and that voice needed to be amplified.

The point is this:

changing anything –

whether it’s conventional ideas
about US national symbols,

traditional thinking challenged
by scientific breakthroughs

or ousting an authoritarian president –

requires a lot of things.

It requires courage,

luck

and also vision and boldness of action.

But on luck –

I have to say, the photo shoot we did
might not have worked out so well.

We laughed after we were out of the area.

But the thing is, it was worth the risk

because of the stakes that were involved.

And in this case, the luck
led to a wonderful,

profound and powerful situation

that was also humorous.

Thank you.

(Applause)

我是一名视觉艺术家

,我创作革命性的艺术
来推动历史向前发展。

我要直截了当
地告诉你:

我不接受美国的经济基础

、社会关系

或执政理念。

我的艺术

通过鼓励观众
从这个角度解决重大问题,从而为根本性的改变做出了贡献。

社会变革很难,
但想法非常重要。

当我说我是艺术家时,
大多数人会想,“哦,他是个画家。”

在我身后,你可以看到
我所做的一些工作。

“想象一个
没有美国的世界”是一幅画,

但我在一系列媒体中工作,

包括摄影、
视频和表演艺术。

当前的一个项目
“奴隶叛乱

重演”将于今年 11
月在新奥尔良郊区重演

1989 年,我的一件艺术品

因其违规
使用美国国旗而成为争议的中心。

“展示美国国旗的正确方式是什么
?”

是一个鼓励观众参与的概念性作品

它由一个蒙太奇照片组成
,上面写着:

“展示美国国旗的正确方法是什么
?”

在它下面是人们
可以在其中写下对该问题的回答的书籍,

而在它下面
是人们可以选择站在上面的旗帜。

照片蒙太奇包括
韩国学生

焚烧美国国旗的图像,他们

举着标语,上面
写着“洋基回家。狗娘养的”

,下面是从越南回来的挂着国旗的棺材

人们写了长短的答案。

成千上万的人以
多种不同的语言参与了这项工作。

有的人说:

“我是德国姑娘,

如果我们德国人也
像你们一样欣赏我们的国旗,

我们又会被称为纳粹,

我觉得你们对这面国旗也有太多的
烦恼。”

“我认为艺术家
应该回到他的遗产,

即非洲丛林,

然后他可以
用他的艺术方式铲粪。”

“我所站的这面旗帜代表
着这个制度中的一切压迫性:

印第安人
和全世界所有受压迫者的谋杀,

包括我
被猪射杀的兄弟,

他踢了他的身体
以‘确保黑鬼 死了。'

“那头猪戴着国旗。

谢谢你,恐惧斯科特,
给我这个机会。”

“身为守旗老兵,

我个人绝不会
为你这个蠢驴辩护!

你该被枪毙!” ——美国海豹突击队。

正如你所看到的,当时人们
对国旗的反应非常强烈,

就像现在一样。

芝加哥艺术学院前有退伍军人示威。

他们高呼诸如

“国旗和艺术家,
把他们都挂在高处”之类的话,

让人想起私刑的形象。

我收到了无数的死亡威胁

,炸弹威胁
也接到了学校的电话。

这是一个非常危险的情况。

后来,布什总统称
这项工作“可耻”

,我认为这是一种巨大的荣誉

,国会宣布这项工作为非法。

(笑声)

当我和其他人违反法律,

在国会大厦的台阶上焚烧旗帜时,我成为了最高法院案件的一部分。

这一行动以及随后的
法律和政治斗争

导致了具有里程碑意义的第一修正案决定
,阻止

政府要求
爱国主义成为强制性的。

但是让我后退一点。

这些人真的是想让我死。

我此时会做的事情
会有所作为。

这正是同一时刻的我,在

人群上方八层楼。

本来应该

是在当时退伍军人所在的台阶上拍摄的照片。

至少可以说,我在那里并不安全。


拍那张照片真的很重要,

因为虽然有些人想杀了我,
但在这种情况

下,那些认为美国
国旗代表着这个系统中一切压迫性事物的人

觉得他们有一个声音

,这个声音需要 被放大。

重点是:

改变任何事情——

无论是
关于美国国家象征的传统观念、

受到科学突破挑战的传统思维

还是推翻专制总统——都

需要做很多事情。

它需要勇气、

运气

,也需要远见和大胆的行动。

但幸运的是——

我不得不说,我们拍摄的照片
可能效果不佳。

我们离开该地区后笑了。

但问题是,

由于涉及的赌注,冒险是值得的。

而在这种情况下,运气
导致了一个奇妙,

深刻,强大的情况

,也很幽默。

谢谢你。

(掌声)