The United States Another Minoritarian Nation

[Music]

we americans whether rightly or wrongly

are proud

of our democratic tradition we don’t

have a simple

democracy we have a representative

democracy what our framers would have

called a republic

and in a republic it is the majority who

is to win

a republic is majoritarian

but other nations and important points

in their past

have not been majoritarian south africa

before the end of apartheid liberia

under the control of african american

nationals iraq with sunnis in baathist

iraq

syria with the alawites rwanda with the

tutsis these nations at those moments

were not majoritarian

they were minoritarian they had systems

that protected a minority

that gave the minority a power to rule

over

the majority that made them minoritarian

okay so the simple idea i want to convey

to you in a couple minutes that i’ll

have your attention here is that

whatever

the united states has been the united

states

is becoming a minoritarian

nation now you might hear that and say

becoming women didn’t have the right to

vote in america until just

early in the last century african

americans halfway through the century

before the populists for much of

american history

had no right to vote and even today

immigrants have no right to vote and

most teens

have no right to vote you could say

america has always been

a minoritarian nation and in that sense

it is true

but i mean something different here i

mean

among those we say should count

among citizens among voters among those

america is becoming a minoritarian

nation and this

i want to argue is new okay here’s what

i mean

the american government is divided into

four critical institutions

congress is divided between a senate and

a house

the executive is ruled by a president

and the judiciary is governed by a

supreme court together

these institutions have built a

precariously

majoritarian representative democracy

here’s why it’s precarious think about

the efficiency of a vote in our

democracy and by that i just mean

how popular votes translate into

political power

so if a vote is 100 efficient it

perfectly translates

into political power if it’s less than

100 efficient

it’s not perfectly translating into

political power

so the house of representatives is the

closest we have to a perfectly efficient

democratic institution

over the past 20 years democrats have

achieved a 97 percent efficiency while

republicans have achieved 103

meaning for every vote they get they get

more than that in effective political

representation

the presidency is a little less

efficient in the period

1796 to 2020

the democracy has succeeded 89

of the time meeting 89 percent of the

time the winner of the popular vote

has been selected as the president the

current

supreme court is much less

democratically efficient

five of the current justices were

appointed

by presidents who were not selected

by the popular vote in their first term

which means we have a 44 democratic

efficiency

in the supreme court and certainly the

worst institution

for democratic efficiency is the united

states senate

between 2020 2020

the democrats had a 95 efficiency in the

united states senate and the republicans

likewise had 103 percent meaning their

votes

mattered more but even more important

because the senate

has two senators per states and states

are wildly different in their population

that means that a small proportion of

america

has the effective ability to block what

the majority

of the people in america might want now

in 1790

what that meant is that states

representing 26 percent of the

population

had the capacity to block legislation in

the senate

but those numbers have only gotten worse

in 2010

it was states representing just 18

percent

of the american population who could

block what the united states senate did

and when you count the filibuster in

2010

states representing just 12 percent

of the american population would have

the capacity to block the united

states senate from passing legislation

that the house has passed and that the

president

would have signed so if you look at that

system you say

it if it’s majoritarian it certainly was

precariously majoritarian and we can see

some of that precariousness too

in the 2020 election in the 2020

election if you look at the votes for

democrats

in every one of the major democratic

institutions

the democrats achieved a majority they

got more votes than republicans in the

house

more votes than republicans in the

senate and more votes than republicans

for the presidency

and indeed the system awarded control to

the democrats in each of those three

institutions but with the presidency

it was extremely precarious though joe

biden

beat donald trump by more than 7 million

votes

if just 26 000 votes in three states

had gone for donald trump donald trump

could have been elected

president in the house of

representatives so if america

is a majoritarian republic it is a

precariously

majoritarian republic at least that has

been

our past okay but here’s the thing if

we’ve been precariously majoritarian

i fear we’re about to become

minoritarian

because of changes that are happening

right now

so consider what we could call the

techniques of minoritarianism

the first technique is vote suppression

after this last election where an

extraordinary number of people

voted because of techniques that enabled

everybody to participate

easily states across the country

are beginning to impose restrictions on

the freedom to vote

to make it harder for democrats to vote

than for republicans

the new york times reports over 200

bills

are now being considered in legislatures

across the country

number two gerrymandering because of the

way

politicians draw districts and because

2020 triggers a new redistricting

cycle in this new cycle because

republicans control

more state houses the republicans will

be able to gerrymander those districts

to produce majority control when they

only have

the minority of the votes as the new

york times reports

the gop could retake the house in 2020

based solely on the gains from newly

drawn

districts and then number three

something we’ve never seen in american

history what we could call

faithless legislature laws states are

considering laws that would give the

legislature the power to flip

the results in a presidential election

if the legislature doesn’t like

who the people voted for if we were

precarious

this precariousness is ending but not in

a good way

this precariously majoritarian democracy

is becoming predictably minoritarian

now elsewhere in other countries you

might expect the judiciary to step in

elsewhere the courts would step in and

demand representational

equality in the face of these types of

changes

ours has at least historically

in 1963 the supreme court declared

against a system

that benefited some minority over the

majority

a principle of one person one vote

constraining how legislatures

might have the power to muck about with

this principle of majoritarianism

but this supreme court has been very

different

it has never resisted this slide to

minoritarianism

it has upheld id rules that

disproportionately burden

democrats it has held up unequal access

rules that disproportionately burden

democrats and it is upheld partisan

gerrymandering

which disproportionately burdens

democrats it is only

ever accelerated minoritarian rule

in the series of decisions about money

in speech the supreme court has upheld

the power

of the rich to participate in our

political system

more powerfully than the rest of us it

has entrenched the power of money

over the people meaning it is entrenched

minoritarian democracy

at least when it comes to money in

politics

i think we have to accept the judges

won’t save us here

and so the question is who could well

the most obvious institution that could

save us from this minoritarianism

is the united states congress and indeed

right now

congress is considering a statute called

hr1

for the people act which is the most

important democratic reform

in two generations to have passed the

house of representatives

what hr one would do is not address the

electoral college because congress

doesn’t have that power directly

and he can’t address the senate because

the power of the senate is entrenched

in the constitution but it radically

reduces the capacity of states to

suppress the votes

of disfavored political parties and it

ends partisan gerrymandering meaning

everyone would have an equal

freedom to vote in districts that were

drawn not for partisan advantage and

most importantly to me

it changes the way money affects

politics giving politicians the capacity

to run their campaigns without depending

upon

the tiny few to fund their campaigns it

does that

and so much more this would be the most

important change we’ve seen

radically entrenching the ideals

of majoritarian democracy but here’s the

catch

for hr1 to pass it must pass the united

states senate

and to pass the united states senate

given the filibuster rule

it needs 60 votes

so that means we need a super majority

to secure majoritarianism

in america in this sense

we’ve produced a minoritarian nation

in this sense america is a rock

okay so that’s a depressing story and if

bad

science fiction is to be believed then

perhaps this hopelessness

is a reason for hope

you say we’re on the brink of

destruction and you’re right

but it’s only on the brink that people

find the will to change only at the

precipice

do we evolve only at

the precipice if the senate can end the

filiposter

and pass h.r 1 then we will have evolved

in america

if not then i fear that this list of

minoritarian nations needs

one more added to the list

the united states for no good reason

and at great loss to the whole of the

world

you

[音乐]

无论对错,我们美国人

为我们的民主传统

感到自豪 是多数派,

但其他国家和

过去的重要点

不是多数派

南非在种族隔离结束之前 利比里亚

在非洲裔美国人的控制下

伊拉克与逊尼派 在复兴党

伊拉克

叙利亚与阿拉维派 卢旺达与图

西族 这些国家在那些时刻

是 不是多数派

他们是

少数派 他们有保护少数派

的制度 赋予少数派统治多数派的权力 让他们成为少数派

没问题 所以我想

在几分钟内向你传达一个简单的想法,我会

在这里引起你的注意 是不是

无论美国曾经是什么

美国

正在成为一个少数派

国家现在你可能会听到 说

成为女性直到

上个世纪初

才在美国拥有投票权 非洲裔美国人在美国历史上大部分时间的民粹主义

者没有投票权之前的一个世纪中叶,即使在今天,

移民也没有投票权,

大多数 青少年

无权投票 你可以说

美国一直是

一个少数派国家,从这个意义上说,

这是真的,

但我在这里的意思是不同的,我的

意思是

在我们所说的应该

算作选民中的公民中那些

美国正在成为一个少数派

国家和

我要争辩说这是新的 好吧这就是

我的

意思 美国政府分为

四个关键机构

国会分为参议院和

众议院 行政部门由总统统治

,司法机构由最高法院管辖

这些机构共同拥有 建立了一个

岌岌可危的

多数派代议制民主,

这就是为什么

在我们的选举中考虑投票的效率是不稳定的

民主,我的意思

是普选票是如何转化为

政治权力的,

所以如果投票的效率为 100,它就

完美地转化

为政治权力,如果它的

效率低于 100,

它就不能完美地转化为

政治权力,

所以众议院是

我们拥有的最接近的

在过去 20 年中,对于一个完全有效的民主机构来说,民主党人的

效率达到了 97%,而

共和党人的效率达到了

103 2020 年

,民主成功了

89 次会议 89% 的

时间由普选的获胜

者被选为总统

现任

最高法院的民主效率要低得多

现任法官中有 5

名是由未被选举

的总统任命的 他们第一个任期内的普选,

这意味着我们有 44 个民主党 最高法院

的政治效率,当然民主效率最差的机构是

美国参议院

在 2020 年到 2020 年之间

,民主党在美国参议院的效率为 95

,而共和党

也同样为 103%,这意味着他们的

选票

更重要,但更重要,

因为 参议院

每个州有两名参议员,各州

的人口差异很大,

这意味着一小部分

美国

有能力阻止

美国大多数人现在在 1790 年可能想要的

东西这意味着代表 26 个州的州

百分之一的

人口

有能力阻止

参议院的立法,

但这些数字在 2010 年只会变得更糟

只有占

美国人口 18% 的

州可以阻止美国参议院的所作所为

,当你计算 2010 年的阻挠议案时

仅占

美国人口 12% 的州将

有能力阻止

美国参议院通过

众议院已经通过并且

总统

会签署的立法,所以如果你看看那个

系统,你会说

如果它是多数派,那肯定是

不稳定的多数派,我们可以看到

其中的一些不稳定

在 2020 年选举中也是如此

如果您查看

每个主要民主

机构

中民主党人的选票,民主党取得了多数票,他们

众议院

获得的选票比共和党人多,比参议院共和党人多,比

参议院多 共和党人

竞选总统

,实际上整个系统

都将这三个机构中的每一个的控制权都授予了民主党人,

但在总统任期内

,尽管乔·

拜登

以超过 700 万票击败唐纳德·特朗普,但

如果三个州只有 26,000 票支持,情况就非常不稳定

。 donald trump donald trump

could have been elected

president in the house of

representatives so if america

i 一个多数主义共和国,它是一个

不稳定的

多数主义共和国,至少

我们的过去还

可以 将

少数主义技术称为第一个技术是在上次选举之后的投票压制,

由于技术使

每个人都可以轻松参与,

因此有大量的人投票 据《

纽约时报》报道,

现在

全国

各地的立法

机构正在考虑 200

多项法案 共和党人将

能够获得的房屋 o gerrymander 这些选区

在只有少数选票时产生多数控制权,

因为《

纽约时报》

报道,共和党可能会在 2020 年仅

根据新选区的收益重新

夺回

众议院,然后排名第三,

这是我们从未见过的 在美国

历史上,我们可以称之为

不忠实的立法机关的法律 各州正在

考虑法律,

如果立法机关不喜欢

人们投票给谁,如果我们

不稳定,那么立法机关将有权改变总统选举的结果

这种不稳定的多数主义民主

现在在其他国家的其他地方正在变成可以预见的少数主义,这并不是一个好的方式,您

可能期望司法机构介入

其他地方

,面对我们至少在历史上所经历的这些类型的变化,法院会介入并要求代表平等

1963 年最高法院宣布

反对

使少数人受益的制度 多数

人一票的原则

限制了立法机构

如何有权对

这一多数主义原则进行处理,

但这个最高法院已经非常

不同了

它从未抵制过这种

滑向少数主义的原则

它坚持了

不成比例地负担

民主主义它的身份规则 支持不平等的准入

规则,这给民主党人带来了不成比例的负担

,支持

党派不公平的划分

,这给民主党人带来了不成比例的负担

。在一系列关于金钱的言论决定中,少数派统治只会加速少数派统治

最高法院支持

富人参与我们的权力

政治制度

比我们其他人更强大它

已经巩固了金钱对人民的权力,

这意味着它是根深蒂固的

少数派民主

至少在

政治金钱方面

我认为我们必须接受法官

不会在这里拯救我们

等等 问题是谁

可以最明显的机构 可以

将我们从这种少数主义中拯救出来的

是美国国会,事实上,

现在

国会正在考虑一项名为

hr1

for the people Act 的法令,这是两代人中最

重要的民主改革

,已经通过

了众议院 不解决

选举团问题,因为国会

没有直接的权力

,他不能解决参议院问题,因为

参议院的权力根植

于宪法,但它从根本上

降低了各州

压制

不受欢迎的政党选票的能力, 它

结束了党派分工,这意味着

每个人都将有平等的

自由在不是为了党派优势而被吸引的地区投票,

对我来说最重要的是

它改变了金钱影响政治的方式,

使政治家

能够在不依赖少数人资助的情况下开展竞选活动

他们的竞选活动就是这样

做的,

而且这将是最

重要的 我们已经看到

从根本上巩固了

多数主义民主的理想,但这

是 hr1 要通过它必须通过

美国参议院

并通过美国参议院的问题,

因为

它需要 60 票的阻挠规则,

这意味着我们需要超级多数

从这个意义上说,为了确保美国的多数主义,

我们已经建立了一个

从这个意义上说的少数主义国家,美国是一块好石头,

所以这是一个令人沮丧的故事,如果

要相信糟糕的科幻小说,那么

也许这种绝望

你说我们希望的理由 重新处于毁灭的边缘

,你是对的,

但只有在边缘,人们

才会发现只有在悬崖边改变的意愿,

如果参议院可以结束

filiposter

并通过 hr 1,我们只会在悬崖边进化,那么我们将拥有 如果不是

在美国发展,

那么我担心这个

少数族裔国家

名单需要再增加一个

美国无缘无故

地给整个世界带来巨大损失