Aliens archaeology why do we get history wrong on purpose

[Music]

a few years ago

a stranger sitting next to me on a plane

asked what i did for a living

i told him that i’m an archaeologist and

i study the ancient maya

he said wow i love archaeology

and told me how excited he gets when

hearing about new finds

then he told me how amazing it is that

aliens from the planet nibiru had come

to earth and established the ancient

sumerian culture in mesopotamia

i have these conversations a lot

on planes in bookstores and in bars

people want to talk with me about

pseudo-archaeology

something that seems like archaeology

but isn’t

it involves making wild and unproven

claims about the human past

things like aliens built the pyramids or

survivors from the lost continent of

atlantis

invented hieroglyphic writing

now most of us know that claims like

these

are unfounded and frankly absurd

yet they’re everywhere they’re on tv

shows

in movies and in books

think of the history channel series

ancient aliens

currently in its 15th season

or of the most recent indiana jones

movie about the kingdom of the crystal

skull

or eric von danigan’s classic book

chariots of the gods which has sold over

70

million copies

here’s the crucial question who cares

it’s just entertainment right isn’t it a

nice escape from reality and a fun way

to think about the world

it’s not most pseudo-archaeology is

racist and xenophobic and like other

forms of entertainment

it influences our culture in real ways

let me give you an example it’s

common to hear pseudo-archaeologists

claim that groups like the ancient

egyptians

or the ancient maya accomplished

incredible things

but only with the help of outside groups

like aliens or people from atlantis what

you

rarely hear is pseudo-archaeologists

claiming

that say romans had help building the

coliseum

or that greeks had help building the

parthenon

why is that for pseudo-archaeologists

europeans could have accomplished their

feats on their own

but non-europeans must have had outside

guidance

claims like these are not just

outrageous

they are offensive here and in

so many other instances

pseudo-archaeology

sustains myths of white supremacy

disparages non-europeans

and discredits their ancestors

achievements

i’ve spent the last 12 summers doing

archaeological field work in the maya

area

several years back i was staying in a

small village along the belize

guatemala border i spent

day after day in the lab staring at tiny

brown eroded pieces of ceramics

the maya man who lived across the street

made slate carvings

to sell to tourists he’d stopped by

every once in a while to chat and one

day he brought

over a slate carving and it was this

image

the image carved into the sarcophagus

lid of the maya king pakal

around his death in 683 a.d

this image is incredible and it’s

complex

it shows the deceased king rising from

the jaws of the underworld

to be reborn as a deity in the center is

a stylized world tree

that extends from the underworld through

the realm of the living

into the upper world around the edges is

a sky

band with symbols for the sun moon

and stars i was

so excited to talk with my neighbor

about

ancient maya religion cosmology

and iconography instead

he wanted to talk about an ancient

aliens episode he had seen

the one about the maya and he told me

that this image was of an astronaut at

the controls of a rocket ship

i was shocked instead of marveling at

his

own ancestors he was in awe of a

fictional alien

he even told me that one day he hoped to

give this carving to eric von daniken

father of the ancient aliens phenomenon

pseudoarchaeology undoubtedly harms its

subjects

often indigenous people like the maya

but it also harms its viewers it harms

all of us like other forms of racism

it exacerbates inequality and prevents

us from appreciating

and benefiting from human diversity

what’s really scary is that

pseudo-archaeology

is a small part of a much bigger

problem it’s just one example of people

getting history wrong

on purpose of people knowingly

changing historical and archaeological

facts

why would anybody do that

often the past is knowingly changed

either to justify racism

in the present or to present a nicer

version of history

a version of history that we can all

take pride in

six years ago jefferson county colorado

became a battleground over how to teach

american history

to high school students the advanced

placement curriculum had

been expanded to include things like

the removal of native americans to

reservations

and the rise of extreme economic

inequality

members of the local school board were

upset

they vigorously protested the changes

arguing that the new curriculum

didn’t do enough to promote capitalism

or american exceptionalism

right now we are in the midst of a

heated debate

over public monuments to controversial

figures

people like robert e lee and christopher

columbus

should these monuments be left as they

are

destroyed or put in museums

and what should happen to the protesters

who deface these monuments

should they be praised for helping

debunk myths of white supremacy

or should they be punished for

vigilantism

and lawlessness what do we make of

scenes

like this for me

debates about history curricula and

public monuments suggest

similar messages first the past

is political what we choose to remember

and forget relates directly to current

political concerns

second we need to consider who presents

the past

who chooses the content of history

textbooks

and the subject matter of public

monuments

imagine how our understanding of history

might be different

if it was told by the marginalized

rather than the powerful

we can help combat racism and xenophobia

today

by changing how we think about the past

archaeologists need to do two things

first we need to make our discipline

more inclusive

we need to work with and for the

descendants of the people we study

richard leventhal’s work at tiasuco

mexico

is groundbreaking pun intended for

over a century foreign archaeologists

have traveled to the maya area

to excavate the things they thought were

interesting

mostly temples and pyramids

leventhal took a different approach

instead

he asked the contemporary maya of

tiasuko

what they thought was interesting and it

turns out they didn’t particularly care

about

temples or pyramids they were interested

in the cast

war a major but understudied

colonial period maya rebellion

second we need to make archaeology more

accessible

the last time i walked into a bookstore

i asked where i could find the

archaeology books

the clerk took me to a section labeled

ancient mysteries and

lost knowledge it had books with titles

like extraplanetary experiences

and what is absolutely absurd about this

is that real archaeology archaeology

based

in scientific facts and historical

context

is fascinating you don’t need aliens to

make it interesting

it’s up to us archaeologists

to find new ways to share our work with

the public

and this used to be the norm in the

1950s there was a game show

on cbs called what in the world

the host would present an object an

artifact

and the archaeologists contestants would

try to figure out

what this thing was and where it was

from

the show was funny and interesting

and exposed viewers to the diversity of

human cultures

beginning in the mid to late 1960s

archaeology changed focus instead of

concentrating on public

engagement archaeologists began working

together

to professionalize the discipline

on the plus side we now have things like

bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates

and theoretical approaches like the new

materialisms

but in the process archaeology left the

public behind

shows like what in the world became less

common

and pseudo-archaeology emerged to fill

the void

but we can all contribute to changing

how we think about the past

when you see a pseudo-archaeological

claim

be skeptical and know that if you

post about atlantis tweet about

ancient aliens or forward a clip from a

pseudo-archaeology tv show

even if it’s not your intention you may

be promoting

racism and xenophobia also know that the

past is alive it is political

it is ever changing and it influences

our daily lives in meaningful ways

so the next time that you watch the

history channel

read an archaeology book or view a

public monument

remember that every statement about the

past

is a powerful statement about the

present

thank you

[Music]

[音乐

] 几年前

,飞机上坐在我旁边

的一个陌生人问我是做什么的

听到新发现时,

他告诉我,

来自尼比鲁星球的外星人

来到地球并

在美索不达米亚建立了古老的苏美尔文化,这真是

太神奇了 我关于

伪考古学的

东西,看起来像考古学,

但它不

涉及对人类过去做出疯狂和未经证实的

主张吗?

比如外星人建造了金字塔,或者

来自失落的亚特兰蒂斯大陆的幸存者

发明了象形文字,

现在我们大多数人都知道这样的主张

这些

是没有根据的,坦率地说是荒谬的,

但它们无处不在,它们出现在电视

节目

、电影和书籍

中 季

或最近

关于水晶头骨王国的印第安纳琼斯电影

或埃里克·冯·达尼根的经典书籍

《众神战车》已售出超过

7000

万册

这是关键问题谁在乎

这只是娱乐对吧这不是一个

不错的逃生 从现实出发,以一种有趣的

方式思考世界

它不是大多数伪考古学是

种族主义和仇外心理,就像其他

形式的娱乐一样,

它以真实的方式影响着我们的文化

让我给你举个例子,

经常听到伪考古学家

声称群体 就像古

埃及人

或古玛雅人一样,完成了

令人难以置信的事情,

但只有在外星人或亚特兰蒂斯人等外部团体的帮助下,

很少听到伪考古学家

声称说罗马人帮助建造了

体育馆

或希腊人帮助建造了帕台农神庙

为什么对于伪考古学家来说,

欧洲人本可以

靠自己

而不是欧洲人完成他们的壮举 一定有外部

指导

声称这些不仅

令人发指,

而且在这里令人反感,

在许多其他情况下,

考古学支持白人至上的神话,

贬低非欧洲人

,诋毁他们祖先的

成就

几年前在玛雅地区工作 我住在

伯利兹危地马拉边境的一个小村庄里,

日复一日地在实验室里盯着

被腐蚀的棕色小陶瓷片

住在街对面的玛雅人

制作石板雕刻

品卖给 游客他

每隔一段时间就会停下来聊天,有

一天他带来

了一个石板雕刻,就是这个

图像 雕刻

在玛雅国王 pakal 的石棺盖上的图像

在他于 683 年去世时

这个图像令人难以置信而且 它很

复杂

它显示已故的国王从

黑社会的颚

中升起重生为中心的神是

一棵延伸的程式化的世界

树 从地下世界

通过生活领域

到上层世界的边缘是

一个

带有太阳月亮

星星符号的天空带 关于古代

外星人的一集 他

看过关于玛雅的那一集 他告诉

我这张照片是一名宇航员在

一艘火箭飞船的控制下

甚至告诉我,有一天他希望

把这幅雕刻作品送给

古代外星人现象之父 eric von

daniken 加剧不平等并阻止

我们欣赏

人类多样性并从中受益

真正可怕的是

伪考古学

只是更大的一小部分

问题 这只是人们

为了

故意

改变历史和考古

事实

弄错历史的一个例子 为什么有人会经常这样做 六年前,我们都

可以引以为豪的是,

科罗拉多州杰斐逊县

成为了一场关于如何向高中生教授美国历史的战场

,高级

安置课程

已经扩大到

包括将美洲原住民驱逐到

保留地

和极端经济的兴起等内容。

地方学校董事会的不平等成员

感到不安,

他们强烈抗议这些变化,

认为新课程

不足以促进资本主义

或美国例外主义

现在我们正处于关于罗伯特等有争议人物的公共纪念碑的

激烈辩论中

e lee 和 christopher

columbus

应该这些monum 当他们

摧毁或被放入博物馆时

,他们会被留下,

如果他们因帮助

揭穿白人至上的神话而受到称赞,

或者他们应该因私刑和无法无天而受到惩罚,那么破坏这些纪念碑的抗议者应该

怎么办?我们如何看待这样的

场景

对我来说,

关于历史课程和

公共纪念碑的辩论表明了

类似的信息,首先,过去

是政治性的,我们选择记住

和忘记的东西与当前的政治问题直接相关;

其次,我们需要考虑谁

呈现过去

谁选择历史教科书的内容

和主题 公共

纪念碑的

想象一下,

如果历史是由被边缘化的

而不是有权势的人

讲述的,我们对历史

的理解可能会有什么不同 我们的学科

更具包容性,

我们需要与他们的后代合作并为他们的

后代工作 我们研究的人

Richard Leventhal 在墨西哥 tiasuco 的工作

是开创性的双关语,

用于一个多世纪以来 外国

考古学家前往玛雅

地区挖掘他们认为有趣的东西,

主要是寺庙和金字塔

Leventhal 采取了不同的方法,

而不是

他询问了 tiasuko 的当代玛雅人

他们认为很有趣,

结果他们并不特别关心

寺庙或金字塔 他们

对铸造

战争感兴趣 一个主要但未被充分研究的

殖民时期 玛雅叛乱

第二次我们需要让考古学更

容易获得

我上次走进书店时

我问我在哪里可以找到

考古

书籍 店员带我去了一个标有

古代奥秘和

失传知识的部分 它有书籍的标题

如外星经历,

而这绝对荒谬的

是,

基于科学事实和历史

背景的真正考古学考古学

是 迷人的你不需要外星人 为了

让它变得有趣

,我们考古学家

要寻找新的方式与公众分享我们的工作

,这曾经是

1950 年代的常态,cbs 上有一个游戏节目

,叫做

主持人将在世界上展示一个物体

神器

和考古学家的参赛者会

试图

弄清楚这东西是什么,它

来自哪里 节目很有趣

,让观众接触到人类文化的多样性,

从 1960 年代中后期开始,

考古学改变了重点,而不是

专注于公众

参与 考古学家开始合作

使学科专业化,积极的

一面是,我们现在有了诸如

放射性碳年代的贝叶斯分析

和新唯物主义等理论方法之类的东西,

但在这个过程中,考古学把

公众抛

在了后面,展示了世界上变得不那么

普遍

和伪的东西 考古学的出现是为了填补

这一空白,

但我们都可

以为改变我们对过去的看法做出贡献

当您看到伪考古

声明时

要持怀疑态度,并知道如果您

发布有关亚特兰蒂斯的关于

古代外星人的推文或转发

伪考古电视节目的剪辑,

即使这不是您的意图,您也

可能在宣传

种族主义和仇外心理。

过去是活着的 它是政治性的

它不断变化,它

以有意义的方式影响着我们的日常生活,

因此下次您观看历史频道时,请

阅读考古书籍或查看

公共纪念碑,

请记住,关于过去的每一个陈述都是关于

过去的有力陈述 现在

谢谢你

[音乐]