Animalogy Change your language. Change the world.

humor me

bend your arm and squeeze your bicep

muscle now touch that muscle with your

other hand

now relax it and squeeze again and relax

what do you feel besides the rock hard

bicep

obviously but aside from that what do

you feel movement right

do you see a little mouse well some

anatomist did when he coined the word

muscle

because the movement of a muscle

reminded him of a little mouse

moving under a blanket the word muscle

comes from the latin word

musculus meaning little mouse there are

animals hiding in other parts of your

anatomy as well

your cornea the transparent membrane

covering the surface of your eye

comes from the latin word cornu meaning

animal horn

because delicate though this tissue

seems it’s actually surprisingly

hard like an animal’s horn i call

these animal-related words animologies

and you’re sitting

on an animology right now at least i am

the coccyx commonly called the tailbone

is a small triangle-shaped bone at the

base of the spinal column

and named for its resemblance to the

beak of a particular

bird coccyx is greek for cuckoo bird

and if you think you’re going to have

trouble remembering all of this you’re

underestimating your hippocampus

the part of your brain crucial for

long-term memory

and named for its resemblance to the

hippocampus a mythological sea creature

that was part fish and part not hippo

horse hippo is greek for horse

we also have animologies for other parts

of our anatomy including those with less

scientific names like buck teeth

crow’s feet goatee ponytail pigtails and

spider veins just to name a few

in fact animologies are everywhere in

our language

many of our own names cities and

countries are named after animals so are

cars

constellations rivers plants and sports

teams

there are thousands of words idioms

metaphors

proverbs everyday expressions even

letters of the alphabet that have

animals hidden within reflecting how

deeply connected we

are to animals and how deeply rooted

they are

in our history our consciousness and our

hearts

but you knew a butt was coming but

alarmingly we have many figures of

speech

that reflect a disturbing amount of

violence towards animals

expressions like kill two birds with one

stone

there’s more than one way to skin a cat

there’s no room to swing a cat

take the bull by the horns to shoot the

ball kill the fatted calf

bleed like a stuck pig make a silk purse

out of a sow’s ear

to eat crow easy as shooting fish in a

barrel the straw that broke the camel’s

back

and to run around like a chicken with

his head cut off we

call people animals when we want to

insult them most

we call someone a snake in the grass or

a dirty rat a bird brain or a filthy pig

fat pig stupid pig greedy pig male

chauvinist pig or just pig

or pick any animal and it’s usually an

insult calling someone a dog or a

chicken

or a worm now i know what you’re

thinking no cow

or pig or chicken or rat or any animal

is hurt or offended when we use their

names as insults so

what’s the big deal the animals

themselves don’t know the difference and

for our part the metaphors serve as

convenient and colorful linguistic

shorthand that everyone

immediately understands and while it’s

true

that the animals don’t know the

difference it’s also

true that our choice of words reflects

our individual

and collective values and reveals much

about who we are what we believe

and how we behave our language

represents and reinforces the attitudes

of our culture giving social credit to

our thoughts

and actions that’s why making sexes

comments even when women

aren’t present is still not okay sexist

comments

whether or not women hear them reinforce

sexist ideas

and behaviors in the same way using

disparaging language about animals

even though the animals are unaware of

it gives social legitimacy to our

depiction of them

as being so inferior to humans that they

deserve to be subjugated

and denied control over their own bodies

their own offspring

and their own lives in fact i would

argue

that the systematic violence we

perpetrate daily against

animals is not only reflected in our

language

but driven by it for hundreds of

millennia our human ancestors

were one weak species in the struggle

for survival

with weapons and will we came to

dominate all other species

even those for whom we were prey as a

result

any reverence we once held for their

autonomy and strength devolved

into chauvinism and arrogance as we

characterize humans as intelligent

and civilized and non-violent and

animals

as simple and savage and violent this is

especially apparent when we hear about

humans

committing the most violent crimes we

don’t say they’re behaving like humans

we say they’re behaving like animals and

yet

for all our self-declared supremacy

humans are wiping out entire species

destroying vital ecosystems

overpopulating

the planet and bringing billions of

animals into the world each year

only to kill them this is not a legacy

we should be proud of

this is a legacy whose consequences are

dire for

all species including our own and that’s

the point

we’re all connected we are all animals

this fact is apparent not only in our

physiological features but also in our

lexicological roots

referring to that immaterial essence

that animates

all living beings the word animal comes

from the latin word

anima meaning breath or soul the word

animal comes from the word that means

soul

and yet one of the ways we justify

subjugating other animals

is to assert that they’re not like us

that they don’t have a soul

this too has consequences in denying

non-human animals a soul we’re debasing

our own

how we know that in order to hurt or

kill

fellow human beings in war or any act of

violence

first you have to dehumanize them to

create a psychological distance from

them

that enables you to justify hurting or

killing them

and the quickest and most effective way

of lowering the status of a human

is to call them an animal this is not

just semantics

using derogatory animal words to

discriminate against fellow humans

has enabled us to commit the worst

atrocities

in human history systematically calling

people of color

apes monkeys and baboons laid the

foundation

for systemic racism and slavery in our

country

systematically depicting native

americans as hogs dogs and

wolves laid the foundation for the near

annihilation

of the indigenous peoples of north

america systematically characterizing

jews as rats

pigs and worms the nazis laid the

groundwork for the murder

of over six million people the hutus

systematically depicting the tutsis as

insects

and cockroaches created the fertile

ground for the rwandan genocide

and while it makes us uncomfortable to

hear these depictions

of various human groups they rest on

stereotypes of

animals which are false in their own

right as if pigs are inherently

disgusting

as if rats are naturally devious as if

wolves are brutal and vicious

they’re not but our perceived human

superiority dictates that we perceive

them as such

and yet if we were to characterize these

animals based

not on our own biases but rather on what

we actually know to be true

about the cognitive emotional and social

lives of these animals

it would be an entirely different story

after all

pigs are intelligent playful and

fastidiously clean

rats are social and adaptable and

resourceful

cockroaches are survivors

characteristics we admire

characteristics we all share however

much we try to differentiate ourselves

from other animals

i think we know deep in our animal bones

dare i say mussels

that we’re more alike than we are

different and that even our small

differences

don’t warrant our arrogance human and

non-human animal alike

we share the fundamental aspects of

eating and drinking

working and playing fighting and loving

birthing and dying living and breathing

some of this is expressed in positive

metaphors that reveal our similarities

busy as a bee

gentle as a lamb quiet as a mouse strong

as an ox

we call people who are the most

protective mother hens

these are expressions to embrace the

idea is not to abandon animal related

words and expressions altogether

the idea is to be aware of our language

and to ask ourselves

does the way we talk and write reflect

and reinforce our connection to

and our compassion for other animals or

does it reflect

and reinforce hostility and disgust

to be clear being mindful of the words

we use is not about restricting or

policing language it’s simply about

making sure our words

are consistent with our values do we

value compassion or violence

connection or separation kindness or

cruelty

now i’ll warn you when you start paying

attention to the words and expressions

you use

you will be surprised by all the

etymologies positive

and negative that you say and here you

may even enjoy finding compassionate

versions

of the most violent idioms instead of

beating a dead horse you may find

there’s no use watering a dead flower

instead of killing two birds with one

stone you may find a way to cut two

carrots with one

knife or whatever you like there is

after all

more than one way to peel a potato the

point is

at a time in our history when we’re so

fixated on what divides us rather than

on what unites us

what we need is a vernacular that

reflects compassion

for everyone in this compassionate

paradigm

we would see animals not as subjects of

ours to use

but as cohabitants contributors and

fellow earthlings

and we would recognize that despite the

highest steam with which we regard our

own species

in our treatment of others and the

planet we share

we might do well to take some cues from

our animal brethren

by changing the way we talk about other

animals we change the way we perceive

them

by changing the way we perceive them we

change the way we treat them

and the way we treat each other by

changing the way we treat each other

we can create the compassionate world we

all say we want

changing the way we talk about animals

may not change animals

but it might just change us and it could

just change the world

you

幽默我

弯曲你的手臂并挤压你的二头肌

现在用另一只手触摸那块肌肉

现在放松它并再次挤压并放松

除了坚硬的二头肌之外你有什么感觉

但除此之外

你觉得运动对

吗你看到一个 一些

解剖学家在创造肌肉这个词时做得很好,

因为肌肉的运动

让他想起了

一只在毯子下移动的小老鼠肌肉这个

词来自拉丁词

musculus,意思是小老鼠有

动物隐藏在你的

解剖结构的其他部分 还有

你的角膜

覆盖你眼睛表面的透明膜

来自拉丁词cornu,意思是

动物的角,

因为虽然这种组织看起来很脆弱,但

它实际上

像动物的角一样坚硬我把

这些与动物相关的词称为animologies

,你

坐在上面 现在的动物学至少我

是尾骨通常称为尾骨

是脊柱底部的小三角形骨

并因其与特定鸟类喙的相似性而得名

尾骨是杜鹃鸟的希腊语

,如果您认为自己将

难以记住所有这些,那么您就

低估了海马体

,这是大脑中对长期至关重要的部分

记忆

并因其与海马体的相似性而得名

一种神话中的海洋生物

,它既是鱼又不是河马

马 河马是希腊语中的马

辫子和

蜘蛛纹 仅举几

例 事实上,动物学在

我们的语言中

无处不在 字母表中

隐藏

了动物,这反映了我们与动物的紧密联系以及如何 它们深深植根

于我们的历史,我们的意识和我们的

心,

但你知道一个屁股即将到来,但

令人震惊的是,我们有许多

修辞格

反映了对动物的暴力表达令人不安的数量,

比如用一块石头杀死两只鸟

有不止一种方法 给猫剥皮

没有地方可以挥动一只猫

抓住公牛的牛角射

球 杀死肥牛

流血就像被卡住的猪

用母猪耳朵

做一个丝袋 吃乌鸦 容易就像在

桶里打鱼 稻草 打断骆驼的

背 像断头的鸡一样到处乱跑

当我们最想侮辱他们时我们称人为动物

我们称某人为草中的蛇

或肮脏的老鼠 鸟脑或肮脏的猪

肥猪 愚蠢 猪 贪婪的猪 大男子

主义的猪 或者只是猪

或者挑选任何动物

称某人为狗、

或蠕虫通常是一种侮辱 现在我知道你在

想什么 没有牛

、猪、鸡或老鼠或任何

动物 当我们使用它们的名字作为侮辱时,t 或被冒犯,

所以

动物

本身不知道区别有

什么大不了

的 不知道

区别

,我们对词语的选择也确实反映了

我们的个人

和集体价值观,并揭示了

我们是谁,我们相信什么以及我们

如何表现我们的语言

代表并强化

了我们文化的态度,赋予

我们的思想

和行为以社会信誉 这就是为什么

即使

女性不在场也

发表性别评论仍然

不行 我们

将他们描述为

不如人类,以至于他们

应该被征服

和否认 控制自己的身体、

自己的后代

和自己的生活 事实上,我

认为我们

每天对

动物实施的系统性暴力不仅反映在我们的

语言中,

而且在数百

千年的时间里,我们的人类祖先

是一个弱小的物种。

用武器为生存而斗争,我们是否会

统治所有其他物种,

甚至是那些我们曾为之猎物的物种?

因此,

我们曾经对它们的自主权和力量所持有的任何崇敬都

变成了沙文主义和傲慢,因为我们

将人类描述为聪明

、文明和非 暴力和

动物

一样简单、野蛮和暴力

当我们听到

人类

犯下最暴力的罪行时,这一点尤其明显

至高无上的

人类正在消灭整个物种,

破坏重要的生态系统

,使地球人口过剩,并带来数十亿

动物 每年到世界上

只是为了杀死他们 这不是

我们应该为之自豪的

遗产 这是一个遗产,其后果

包括我们自己在内的所有物种都是可怕的,这就是

我们都相互联系的重点 我们都是动物

这个事实是显而易见的 不仅在我们的

生理特征中,而且在我们的

词汇学根源中,

指的

是使

所有生物具有生命力的非物质本质 动物一词

来自拉丁词

anima 意为呼吸或灵魂 动物一词来自意为灵魂的词

,但其中之一 我们为征服其他动物辩护的方式

是断言它们与我们不同

,它们没有灵魂

这也会导致否定

非人类动物的灵魂 我们贬低自己的灵魂

我们如何知道这一点 为了伤害 或

在战争或任何暴力行为中杀死同胞,

您必须首先将他们非人化以与他们

建立心理距离,

从而使您能够证明伤害或杀死他们是正当的

,并且最快

降低人类地位的最有效方法

就是称他们为动物 这

不仅仅是语义

使用贬义动物词来

歧视人类同胞

使我们能够犯下人类历史上最严重的

暴行 系统地

称有色人种

猿猴和 狒狒

为我们国家的系统性种族主义和奴隶制奠定了基础 系统

地将美洲原住民描述

为猪狗和狼 为北美

土著人民几乎灭绝奠定了基础

系统地将

犹太人描述为老鼠

猪和蠕虫 纳粹奠定了

基础

超过 600 万人被谋杀 胡图人

系统地将图西人描绘成

昆虫

和蟑螂

,为卢旺达

种族灭绝创造了

肥沃的土壤

就好像猪天生就是

dis

好像老鼠天生狡猾,好像

狼是残酷和恶毒的,

它们不是,但我们感知到的人类

优越性决定了我们如此看待

它们

,然而,如果我们

不是根据我们自己的偏见而是根据我们的偏见来描述这些动物

实际上知道这些动物

的认知情感和社交

生活是真实的,

这将是一个完全不同的故事

毕竟

猪是聪明的顽皮和

讲究清洁的

老鼠是社交和适应性强和

足智多谋的

蟑螂是幸存者的

特征我们钦佩的

特征我们都有

多少共同点 我们试图将自己

与其他动物

区别开来

我们分享

饮食工作和

娱乐的基本方面 ng 和呼吸

其中一些以积极的

隐喻来表达,揭示我们的相似之处

忙碌如蜜蜂

温柔如羊羔 安静如老鼠 强壮

如牛

我们称之为最

保护母鸡的人

这些是接受这个

想法的表达不是 完全放弃与动物相关的

词语和表达方式

,就是要了解我们的语言,

并问

自己,我们说话和写作的方式是否反映

和加强了我们与

其他动物的联系和同情心,还是反映和加强了对其他动物的

敌意和厌恶?

清楚地注意

我们使用的词语不是限制或

监管语言,而只是

确保我们的言辞

与我们的价值观一致我们

重视同情或暴力

联系或分离善良或

残忍现在我会在你开始支付

注意你使用的单词和表达

你会对你所说的所有

积极

和消极的词源感到惊讶,在这里你

甚至可能喜欢找到

最暴力的成语的富有同情心的版本而不是

打死马 你可能会发现

给死花浇水

而不是用一块石头杀死两只鸟是没有用的

你可能会找到

用一

把刀或任何东西切两个胡萝卜的方法

就像剥土豆皮的方法毕竟不止一种,

关键是

在我们的历史上,当我们如此

专注于分裂我们的东西而

不是团结我们的

东西时,我们需要的是一种

反映

对每个人的同情的白话 这种富有同情心的

范式,

我们不会将动物视为

我们使用的对象,

而是将其视为同居的贡献者和

地球同胞

我们可以

通过改变我们谈论其他动物的方式来从我们的动物兄弟那里获得一些线索

我们通过改变我们对

它们

的看法来改变我们对它们的看法

改变我们对待

它们的方式和我们对待彼此

的方式 通过改变我们对待彼此的方式

我们可以创造一个富有同情心的世界 我们

都说我们想要

改变我们谈论动物的方式

可能不会改变动物,

但它可能只会改变我们和 它

可以改变你的世界