Can animals be deceptive Eldridge Adams

A male firefly glows above a field
on a summer’s night,

emitting a series of enticing flashes.

He hopes a nearby female will respond
with her own lightshow

and mate with him.

Sadly for this male,

it won’t turn out quite the way he plans.

A female from a different species
mimics his pulsing patterns:

by tricking the male with
her promise of partnership,

she lures him in–

and turns him into an easy meal.

He’s been deceived.

Behavioral biologists have identified
three defining hallmarks of deception

by non-human animals:

it must mislead the receiver,

the deceiver must benefit,

and it can’t simply be an accident.

In this case we know that the predatory
firefly’s signal isn’t an accident

because she flexibly
adjusts her flash pattern

to match males of different species.

Based on this definition,

where is animal deception seen in nature?

Camouflage is a good starting point–

and one of the most familiar examples
of animal trickery.

The leaf-tailed gecko and the
octopus fool viewers

by blending into the surfaces
on which they rest.

Other animals use mimicry
to protect themselves.

Harmless scarlet kingsnakes have evolved
red, yellow, and black patterns

resembling those of the venomous
eastern coral snake

to benefit from the protective warnings
these markings convey.

Even some plants use mimicry:

there are orchids that look and smell like
female wasps to attract hapless males,

who end up pollinating the plant.

Some of these animals benefit
by having fixed characteristics

that are evolutionary suited
to their environments.

But in other cases,

the deceiver seems to anticipate
the reactions of other animals

and to adjust its behavior accordingly.

Sensing a threat,

the octopus will rapidly change its colors
to match its surroundings.

Dwarf chameleons color-match their
environments more closely

when they see a bird predator
rather than a snake–

birds, after all,
have better color vision.

One of the more fascinating
examples of animal deception

comes from the fork-tailed drongo.

This bird sits atop tall trees
in the Kalahari Desert,

surveying the landscape for predators
and calling when it senses a threat.

That sends meerkats, pied babblers,
and others dashing for cover.

But the drongo will also sound
a false alarm

when those other species
have captured prey.

As the meerkats and babblers flee,

the drongo swoops down
to steal their catches.

This tactic works about half the time–

and it provides drongos
with much of their food.

There are fewer solid cases

of animals using signals to trick members
of their own species,

but that happens too.

Consider the mantis shrimp.

Like other crustaceans,

it molts as it grows,

which leaves its soft body
vulnerable to attack.

But it’s still driven to protect
its home against rivals.

So it has become a masterful bluffer.

Despite being fragile,

a newly molted shrimp is actually
more likely to threaten intruders,

spreading the large limbs it usually uses
to strike or stab its opponents.

And that works –

bluffers are more likely to keep
their homes than non-bluffers.

In its softened condition,

a mantis shrimp couldn’t
withstand a fight–

which is why we can be confident

that its behavior is a bluff.

Biologists have even noticed
that its bluffs are tactical:

newly molted mantis shrimp are more likely
to bluff against smaller rivals,

who are especially likely
to be driven away.

It would seem that instead of just
threatening reflexively,

the mantis shrimp is swiftly gauging the
situation and predicting others’ behavior,

to get the best result.

So we know that animals can deceive,

but do they do so with intent?

That’s a difficult question,

and many scientists think
we’ll never be able to answer it.

We can’t observe animals’
internal thoughts.

But we don’t need to know what an animal
is thinking in order to detect deception.

By watching behavior and its outcomes,

we learn that animals manipulate
predators, prey, and rivals,

and that their capacity for deception

can be surprisingly complex.

一只雄性萤火虫
在夏夜的田野上

发光,发出一系列诱人的闪光。

他希望附近的雌性会
用她自己的灯光秀做出回应

并与他交配。

可悲的是,对于这个男性来说,

结果不会完全按照他的计划进行。

来自不同物种的雌性
模仿他的脉动模式:

通过
承诺合作的方式欺骗雄性,

她引诱他进入 -

并将他变成一顿轻松的饭菜。

他被骗了。

行为生物学家已经确定

了非人类动物欺骗的三个决定性特征:

它必须误导接受者

,欺骗者必须受益,

而且它不能只是一个意外。

在这种情况下,我们知道掠食性
萤火虫的信号并非偶然,

因为她灵活地
调整了闪光模式

以匹配不同物种的雄性。

根据这个定义,

自然界中的动物欺骗行为在哪里?

伪装是一个很好的起点

——也是最常见
的动物诡计之一。

叶尾壁虎和
章鱼

通过融入
它们休息的表面来愚弄观众。

其他动物使用模仿
来保护自己。

无害的猩红色王蛇进化出
红色、黄色和黑色的图案,

类似于有毒的
东部珊瑚蛇,

以受益于
这些标记所传达的保护性警告。

甚至一些植物也使用模仿:

有些兰花看起来和闻起来都像
雌性黄蜂,以吸引倒霉的雄性

,最终为植物授粉。

其中一些动物
因具有

适合其环境的进化特征而受益。

但在其他情况下

,欺骗者似乎会预测
其他动物的反应

并相应地调整其行为。

感觉到威胁

,章鱼会迅速改变颜色
以适应周围环境。

当侏儒变色龙

看到鸟类捕食者
而不是蛇时

,它们与环境的颜色更匹配——毕竟鸟类
有更好的色觉。 动物欺骗的

一个更引人入胜的
例子

来自叉尾龙戈。

这只鸟栖息
在喀拉哈里沙漠的高大树上,

观察周围的掠食者
,并在感觉到威胁时发出呼叫。

这让猫鼬、花斑呱呱叫
和其他人急忙寻找掩护。

但是

当其他
物种捕获猎物时,drongo也会发出虚惊。

随着猫鼬和咿呀咿呀的逃跑

,卓龙俯冲
下来偷走他们的渔获物。

这种策略大约有一半的

时间奏效——它为卷尾鱼
提供了大部分食物。

动物使用信号欺骗
自己物种成员的真实案例较少,

但这也发生了。

考虑螳螂虾。

像其他甲壳类动物一样,

它会随着生长而蜕皮,

这使得它柔软的身体
很容易受到攻击。

但它仍然致力于保护
自己的家园免受竞争对手的侵害。

所以它变成了一个高超的虚张声势。

尽管很脆弱

,但新蜕皮的虾实际上
更有可能威胁入侵者,

伸展它通常
用来攻击或刺伤对手的大四肢。

这很管用——

虚张声势的人比非虚张声势的人更有可能保住
自己的家。

在软化状态下

,螳螂虾无法
承受战斗——

这就是为什么我们可以

确信它的行为是虚张声势。

生物学家甚至
注意到它的虚张声势是战术性的:

新蜕皮的螳螂虾更有
可能虚张声势对抗较小的对手

,这些对手尤其
容易被赶走。

看起来

,螳螂虾不仅是反射性地威胁,而是迅速
判断情况并预测其他人的行为,

以获得最好的结果。

所以我们知道动物可以欺骗,

但他们这样做是故意的吗?

这是一个难题

,许多科学家认为
我们永远无法回答它。

我们无法观察动物的
内心想法。

但是我们不需要知道动物
在想什么来发现欺骗。

通过观察行为及其结果,

我们了解到动物会操纵
捕食者、猎物和竞争对手,

而且它们的欺骗

能力可能非常复杂。