The case of the vanishing honeybees Emma Bryce

There is an environmental mystery afoot,

and it begins
with a seemingly trivial detail

that reveals a disaster
of global proportions.

One day, you notice that the honey
you slather on your morning toast

is more expensive.

Instead of switching to jam,

you investigate the reason
for the price hike.

What you find is shocking.

The number of domesticated
honeybees in the US

has been decreasing at an alarming rate.

This decline appears too big

to be explained by the usual causes
of bee death alone:

disease, parasites or starvation.

A typical crime scene
has almost no adult bees left in the hive,

except, perhaps, a lonely queen
and a few other survivors.

It’s full of untouched food stores
and a brood of unborn larvae,

suggesting that the adults vacated
without waiting for them to hatch.

But what’s particularly eerie

is that there’s no tell-tale mass
of dead or dying bees nearby.

Either they have forgotten
their way back to the hive,

or they have simply disappeared.

These mysterious
disappearances aren’t new.

Humans have been collecting
honey for centuries.

But it wasn’t until European settlers
in the 1600’s

introduced the subspecies,
Apis mellifera,

that we domesticated bees.

Since the 19th century,

beekeepers have reported
occasional mass disappearances,

giving them enigmatic names

like disappearing disease,
spring dwindle disease

and autumn collapse.

But when in 2006 such losses
were found to affect

more than half of all hives in the US,

the phenomenon got a new name:

colony collapse disorder.

The most frightening thing
about this mystery

isn’t that we’ll have to go back
to using regular sugar in our tea.

We farm bees for their honey,

but they also pollinate our crops
on an industrial scale,

generating over 1/3 of America’s
food production this way.

So, how can we find
the culprit behind this calamity?

Here are three of the possible offenders.

Exhibit A: Pests and Disease.

Most infamous is the varroa mite,

a minuscule red pest that not only
invades colonies and feeds on bees,

but also transfers pathogens
that stunt bee growth

and shortens their life span.

Exhibit B: Genetics.

The queen is the core of a healthy hive.

But nowadays, the millions
of queen bees distributed

in commercial hives are bred
from just a few original queens,

which raises the worry about
a lack of genetic diversity

which could weaken bees' defenses
against pathogens and pests.

Exhibit C: Chemicals.

Pesticides used both
on commercial beehives

and agricultural crops
to ward off parasites

could be getting into the food
and water that honeybees consume.

Researchers have even found
that some pesticides

damage the honeybees' homing abilities.

So we have a file full of clues

but no clear leads.

In reality, scientists,
the actual detectives on this case,

face disagreement over what causes
colony collapse disorder.

For now, we assume that
several factors are the cause.

Honeybees aren’t necessarily
in danger of extinction,

but fewer bees overall means
less pollination and higher food costs,

so it’s crucial that scientists solve
the case of the vanishing bees.

Because while having less honey
might be a buzzkill,

crop shortages are something
that would truly sting.

一个环境之谜正在酝酿之中

,它
始于一个看似微不足道的细节

,却揭示了一场
全球规模的灾难。

有一天,你注意到
你早上吐司上涂的蜂蜜

更贵。

您无需转而使用果酱,

而是调查
价格上涨的原因。

你的发现令人震惊。 美国

驯养蜜蜂的数量

一直在以惊人的速度下降。

这种下降似乎太大

,无法仅用蜜蜂死亡的常见原因来解释

疾病、寄生虫或饥饿。

典型的犯罪
现场几乎没有成年蜜蜂留在蜂巢中

,也许除了孤独的女王
和其他一些幸存者。

它充满了未动过的食品店
和一群未出生的幼虫,

这表明成虫
没有等待它们孵化就离开了。

但特别令人毛骨悚然的

是,附近没有
大量死亡或垂死的蜜蜂。

要么他们忘记
了回到蜂巢的路,

要么他们就这样消失了。

这些神秘的
失踪并不新鲜。

几个世纪以来,人类一直在收集蜂蜜。

但直到 1600 年代欧洲定居者

引入了蜜蜂亚种

,我们才驯化了蜜蜂。

自 19 世纪以来,

养蜂人报告了
偶尔的大规模失踪,

给他们起了神秘的名字,

如消失病、
春季萎缩病

和秋季崩溃。

但是,当 2006 年发现这种损失
影响

了美国一半以上的荨麻疹时,

这种现象有了一个新名称:

蜂群崩溃紊乱。 关于

这个谜,最可怕

的不是我们必须重新
在茶中使用普通糖。

我们为蜜蜂种植蜂蜜,

但它们也在
工业规模上为我们的农作物授粉,以这种方式

产生了美国超过 1/3 的
粮食产量。

那么,我们如何才能找到
这场灾难的罪魁祸首呢?

以下是三个可能的罪犯。

图表 A:病虫害。

最臭名昭著的是瓦螨,这

是一种微小的红色害虫,它不仅会
侵入蜂群并以蜜蜂为食

,还会传播
阻碍蜜蜂生长

并缩短其寿命的病原体。

图表 B:遗传学。

蜂王是健康蜂巢的核心。

但如今,
分布

在商业蜂巢中的数百万蜂王
仅由少数原始蜂王培育而成,

这引发了人们
对缺乏遗传多样性的担忧,

这可能会削弱蜜蜂
对病原体和害虫的防御能力。

附件 C:化学品。

用于商业蜂箱

和农作物
以抵御寄生虫的杀虫剂

可能会进入
蜜蜂消耗的食物和水中。

研究人员甚至
发现一些杀虫剂会

损害蜜蜂的归巢能力。

所以我们有一个充满线索

但没有明确线索的文件。

实际上,科学家,也
就是本案的真正侦探

,在导致
菌落崩溃症的原因上存在分歧。

目前,我们假设有
几个因素是原因。

蜜蜂不一定
有灭绝的危险,

但总体而言,蜜蜂数量减少意味着
授粉减少和食品成本增加,

因此科学家解决
蜜蜂消失的案例至关重要。

因为虽然少吃蜂蜜
可能会让人大吃一惊,但

作物短缺
才是真正令人痛心的事情。