Valerie PurdieGreenaway The anxiety that comes from being treated like an outsider TED

Transcriber:

[How to Deal with Difficult Feelings]

Cloe Shasha Brooks: Hello, welcome.

You are watching a TED Interview series

called “How to Deal with
Difficult Feelings.”

I’m Cloe Shasha Brooks,
your host and a curator at TED.

Now I will be speaking with
Valerie Purdie-Greenaway,

social psychologist
and Columbia University professor.

She directs the Laboratory of Intergroup
Relations and the Social Mind,

where she researches
the us-versus-them mindset

with the goal of fostering
understanding between groups.

And she has wisdom to share

about the relationship
between feeling like an outsider

and anxiety.

So let’s bring on Valerie.

Hello, Valerie, thank you for being here.

One of the things I’ve been excited
to ask you about is just, you know,

you talk about how there’s two ways
of seeing anxiety, right?

Chronic anxiety and context-based anxiety.

So can you define the two for us?

Valerie Purdie-Greenaway: There’s two ways
of thinking about anxiety.

I think the first way that people
traditionally think about anxiety

is chronic anxiety.

We are still in the midst of a pandemic.

People are anxious.

Some others might think of anxiety
in terms of their personality,

you know, their micromanagers,

and these kinds of anxieties
are sort of everyday anxieties

that are with us
for a long period of time.

What I study is another kind of anxiety

that other people may not be aware of.

And this is the anxiety that comes from
being part of a social group,

whether it’s your race, your ethnicity,
your gender, your sexual orientation,

your size,

and walking around the world

and sort of bumping up to environments
where you’re stereotyped,

where you’re “otherwise-d,”

and that context
makes you feel different.

And in that moment,

you can feel it’s the same
biological kind of anxiety and stress,

but it comes from the context.

So I study the kind of stress,
anxiety, frustration

that stems from being a member
of a group that can be stereotyped,

and I study the kinds of contexts
that make that happen,

whether it’s at work, at school,
church, in your synagogue, you know,

all of the types of contexts that can
either intentionally or inadvertently

make us feel otherwise,
which causes that anxiety.

CSB: Yeah. And so, let’s say
someone’s dealing with anxiety

in association with a specific context,

like being the only
person of color in a classroom

or the only woman on a team at work.

What would you suggest as strategies
for managing that anxiety?

VPG: The first thing
is to just recognize that it’s not you.

If you feel stress, you feel anxiety,

it’s not you.

There’s not something wrong with you.

There’s something wrong with the context.

The second thing is sort of deciding:
Is it really worth it?

Do you actually care?

Because not every environment
really matters.

Once you contextualize,
once you understand it’s not you,

you have to create
a system of support around you

to kind of fact-check your experiences.

For instance, do you have a mentor
who is in a similar situation,

who came some years before you?

When you talk to them, they can help you
to understand that it’s not you.

They can help you fact-check.

They can help you navigate
what’s happening.

I think the other thing which comes
out of some research that I have done

is when you situate that moment

relative to who you are more broadly –
I am bigger than this moment –

sometimes those kinds of affirmations
can be incredibly helpful in that moment

for sort of reducing that stress.

CSB: Well, let’s take
one of our audience questions.

So from LinkedIn, someone asks,

“What can we do to best support
people in our lives

who are suffering
from context-based anxiety?”

VPG: Oh, that’s a great question.

The question of what we can do
to support others in our lives

that are experiencing
context-based identity

is important because oftentimes,
it’s undetectable.

One of the most challenging aspects
of a context-based stress –

the scientific term is called
“stereotype threat” –

the challenge with that is you have
this physiological feeling.

You might feel stressed, you might feel
anxious, you might be overworking.

Are you working at two and three
in the morning,

like, overworking on a presentation?

But the problem is, you might not be able
to actually detect it in others.

You can oftentimes understand

what situations a partner or person
or friend is going into ahead of time

and sort of sharing this idea

that when you’re in contexts
where you are a solo status,

you’re the only one,

this is something that could happen,

this is an experience you could feel.

It’s not you; it’s a common situation.

I have found over and over and over again,

just taking the heat off of an individual

to sort of place it back
where it’s supposed to be in the context

is incredibly helpful.

CSB: That’s interesting and valuable.

I mean, one of the things that
feels connected to that, too,

is obviously, being
in these context-based,

anxiety-producing situations

can create anger and frustration,

especially for those who have been
affected by violence or injustice.

Can you can you talk more about that flow
from anger and frustration to anxiety?

VPG: Violence, frustration is, these days,

far too familiar to many of us.

When we think about all that has
come out of George Floyd,

we think about the continuing challenges
that women face in the workplace,

we think about the trans community,

and what they’re dealing with
in terms of athletes and athleticism

and whether or not they’re considered
truly part of a sport,

particularly in women’s sports –

there are so many different identities
that are being challenged right now.

And what we find in our research

is that there’s a natural flow
from anxiety, stress,

questioning whether,
“Is it something about me?”

“What is it about my group?”

to the shift in understanding that society
is seeing and treating you differently,

and that causes anger,
and that causes frustration.

The problem with this is,
at the physiological level,

it’s still stress,

and stress is debilitating.

It keeps us up at night.

It keeps us overeating.

It keeps us undereating.

You look at the early onset
of cardiovascular disease.

The problem is, stress is debilitating.

So even though those moments of anger

may even make you feel like
you can do something,

you feel empowered as a group,

it still can erode our health.

And so when I think
about inclusive societies,

I think about it
from a justice perspective.

I also think about it
from a health perspective,

because it’s all linked together.

CSB: Absolutely. Yeah.

We have another question
from the audience. Let’s bring that up.

From Facebook: “Is it possible
to use anxiety in a positive way?”

VPG: It is absolutely a good idea.

And when you understand
that you can leverage the power of anxiety

in a positive way,

you can do a lot of different things.

So, for instance, there’s a relationship
between anxiety and performance.

There’s lots of research on this.

It’s sort of an old idea.

And the idea is that some anxiety is good.

My doctoral advisor, Claude Steele,

after giving thousands of talks
and writing books, I would ask him,

“Do you still get anxious
on the first day of class?”

And he said to me, “Valerie, when you stop
being nervous the first day of class,

it’s time to retire.”

CSB: (Laughs)

VPG: Because that’s
a good kind of anxiety, right?

But the problem is, that anxiety
can also shift to being debilitated,

where you’re just stressed,
you start to feel frazzled,

you start to feel like your brain
isn’t working properly.

And so some anxiety is good.

It’s sort of like
the sweet spot of anxiety.

And then if you keep going, it can become
debilitating and erode performance.

So it’s the back-and-forth
between some is good, too much is bad,

that we need to be thinking about,

both as ourselves as individuals

and also when we’re
part of organizations.

CSB: We have a new question
from the audience.

Let’s bring that one up, please.

Thank you.

OK, Kristin Sánchez Salas
from LinkedIn says,

“What can you do if your context-based
anxiety is provoked by a colleague,

client, superior or someone
you work with regularly?”

VPG: My strategy is:
first time, forgiveness.

Sometimes, fact-checking:

What is it that you actually heard?
What is it that someone said?

Trying to understand someone’s intentions,

that’s, I think, the first step.

The second step is,

this is something that is not
going to be tolerated,

because it impacts your ability to thrive,

and it impacts other people
who are members of their group.

So this becomes a manager issue.

This becomes a leadership issue.

And true inclusive leadership is taking
a stand and saying “We’re not doing this,”

and then setting the groundwork
so it doesn’t happen again.

CSB: Yeah, that’s really great advice.

But we’re almost at the end,

so I’m just going to ask you one final
question leading from that, which is:

If you’re told that you are the cause
of context-based anxiety,

what’s the first thing you should do?

VPG: If you’re told that you are the cause
of context-based anxiety,

remember my face: it’s not you,

it’s the situation that you are in.

Trust your judgment,

particularly if you have
experienced solo status once,

you’ve experienced it again.

If you’ve been stereotyped once,

you’ve probably had this experience

over and over.

So trust your intuition that it’s not you
bringing paranoia to the workplace,

that these kind of stereotypes
and otherisms are rife and alive.

I think that’s the first thing.

And then the second thing
is having these layers of support

around mentors and sponsors,

who can tell you
that you are doing just fine,

there’s something amiss
in this environment.

That layer of support
is incredibly important.

It’s important for everyone.

But if you’re a member of a social group

that contends with these kinds of
challenges in society,

that layer of support
that you can go after

in terms of creating
robust social networks,

that is a key.

CSB: This has been so valuable, Valerie.

Thank you so much
for taking the time to talk with me.

VPG: Thank you so much.

抄写员:

【如何处理困难的情绪】

Cloe Shasha Brooks:你好,欢迎。

你正在观看一个

名为“如何应对
困难情绪”的 TED 访谈系列。

我是克洛·莎莎·布鲁克斯,
您的主持人和 TED 策展人。

现在我将与

社会心理学家
和哥伦比亚大学教授 Valerie Purdie-Greenaway 交谈。

她领导着群体间
关系和社会心理实验室,

在那里她研究
了我们与他们的心态

,目的是促进
群体之间的理解。

关于

感觉像局外人

和焦虑之间的关系,她有智慧可以分享。

所以让我们来谈谈瓦莱丽。

你好,瓦莱丽,谢谢你的光临。

我一直很兴奋
地问你的一件事就是,你知道,

你谈到了如何
看待焦虑的两种方式,对吧?

慢性焦虑和基于情境的焦虑。

那么你能为我们定义这两者吗?

Valerie Purdie-Greenaway:有
两种思考焦虑的方式。

我认为人们传统上思考焦虑的第一种方式

是慢性焦虑。

我们仍处于大流行之中。

人们很着急。

其他一些人可能会
根据他们的个性,

你知道,他们的微观

管理者来考虑焦虑,而这些焦虑
是我们长期存在的日常焦虑

我研究的是另一种

其他人可能没有意识到的焦虑。

这是来自于
成为社会群体的一部分的焦虑,

无论是你的种族、种族
、性别、性取向

、体型,

还是环游世界,

以及遇到刻板印象的环境

,你是“otherwise-d”的地方

,这种情况
让你感觉不同。

在那一刻,

你可以感觉到这是同样的
生物焦虑和压力,

但它来自上下文。

所以我研究了

作为一个
可以被刻板印象的群体中的一员所产生的压力、焦虑和沮丧,

并且我研究了
导致这种情况发生的各种环境,

无论是在工作、学校、
教堂还是在你的犹太教堂 ,你知道的,

所有类型的上下文
都会有意或无意地

让我们有不同的感觉,
这会导致焦虑。

CSB:是的。 因此,假设
某人正在处理

与特定背景相关的焦虑,

例如
成为教室中唯一的有色人种

或工作团队中唯一的女性。

作为管理这种焦虑的策略,你有什么建议

VPG:
首先要认识到不是你。

如果你感到压力,你会感到焦虑,

那不是你。

你没有什么问题。

上下文有问题。

第二件事是决定:
这真的值得吗?

你真的在乎吗?

因为并非每个环境都
真正重要。

一旦你
了解了背景,一旦你明白这不是你,

你就必须
在你周围创建一个支持系统,

以对你的经历进行事实检查。

例如,你有没有比你早几年
来的类似情况的

导师?

当您与他们交谈时,他们可以帮助
您了解不是您。

他们可以帮助您进行事实核查。

他们可以帮助您
了解正在发生的事情。

我认为从
我所做的一些研究中得出的另一件事

是,当你把那个时刻

与你更广泛地联系起来时——
我比这个时刻更大——

有时这些肯定
在那一刻会非常有帮助

为了减轻这种压力。

CSB:好吧,让
我们来回答一个听众的问题。

因此,LinkedIn 有人问:

“我们能做些什么来最好地支持
生活中

患有基于情境的焦虑的人?”

VPG:哦,这是一个很好的问题。

我们可以做些什么
来支持生活

中正在经历
基于情境的身份的其他人的问题

很重要,因为通常情况下,
它是无法察觉的。

基于情境的压力中最具挑战性的方面之一 -

  • 科学术语称为
    “刻板印象威胁”

  • 挑战是你有
    这种生理感觉。

你可能会感到压力,你可能会感到
焦虑,你可能会过度

工作。你是否
在凌晨两三点工作,

比如 , 在演示文稿上工作过度?

但问题是,您可能无法
在其他人身上真正发现它。

您通常可以提前了解

合作伙伴或人
或朋友正在进入什么情况,

并在某种程度上分享这个想法

,当您 “
在你是独行者的情况下,

你是唯一的人,

这是可能发生的事情,

这是你能感受到的经历

。不是你;这是一种常见的情况。

我一遍又一遍地发现 再一次,

只是把头 t 离开个人

将其
放回它应该在上下文中的位置

是非常有帮助的。

CSB:这很有趣也很有价值。

我的意思是,与此相关的一

件事显然是,
处于这些基于情境的、

产生焦虑的情境中

会产生愤怒和沮丧,

尤其是对于那些
受到暴力或不公正影响的人。

你能多谈谈
从愤怒和沮丧到焦虑的过程吗?

VPG:暴力,挫败感,这些天

来,我们中的许多人都太熟悉了。

当我们
想到乔治·弗洛伊德的一切时,

我们会想到
女性在工作场所面临的持续挑战,

我们会想到跨性别社区,

以及他们在
运动员和运动能力方面所面临的问题,

以及是否 他们被认为
是一项真正的运动的一部分,

尤其是在女子运动中——

现在有很多不同的
身份正在受到挑战。

我们在研究中发现,

焦虑、压力

、质疑
“是否与我有关?”

“我的小组怎么了?”

转变为理解社会
对你的看法和对待你的方式不同

,这会引起愤怒
和挫败感。

问题在于,
在生理层面上,

它仍然是压力

,压力使人衰弱。

它让我们夜不能寐。

它让我们暴饮暴食。

它让我们吃不饱。

你看看
心血管疾病的早期发作。

问题是,压力使人衰弱。

因此,即使那些愤怒的时刻

甚至可能让你觉得
你可以做某事,

你觉得作为一个群体被赋予了权力,

它仍然会侵蚀我们的健康。

因此,当我
考虑包容性社会时,

我会
从正义的角度来考虑。

我也
从健康的角度来考虑它,

因为它们都是联系在一起的。

CSB:当然。 是的。

我们还有
观众提出的另一个问题。 让我们提出来。

来自 Facebook:“是否有可能
以积极的方式使用焦虑?”

VPG:这绝对是个好主意。

当你
明白你可以以积极的方式利用焦虑的力量时

你可以做很多不同的事情。

因此,例如,
焦虑和表现之间存在关系。

这方面有很多研究。

这是一个古老的想法。

这个想法是,有些焦虑是好的。

我的博士生导师克劳德·斯蒂尔(Claude Steele)

在进行了数千次演讲
和写书之后,我会问他:

“你
第一天上课还焦虑吗?”

他对我说,“瓦莱丽,当你
在上课的第一天不再紧张

时,就该退休了。”

CSB:(笑)

VPG:因为这是
一种很好的焦虑,对吧?

但问题是,焦虑
也可能转变为虚弱

,你只是感到压力,
你开始感到疲惫,

你开始觉得你的
大脑不能正常工作。

所以有些焦虑是好的。

这有点像
焦虑的甜蜜点。

然后,如果您继续前进,它可能会变得
虚弱并削弱性能。

因此

无论是作为个人,还是作为

组织的一部分,我们都需要思考一些好与坏之间的反复来回。

CSB:我们有一个来自观众的新问题

让我们把那个举起来,拜托。

谢谢你。

好的,
来自 LinkedIn 的 Kristin Sánchez Salas 说:

“如果您的基于情境的
焦虑是由同事、

客户、上级或
您经常共事的人引起的,您该怎么办?”

VPG:我的策略是:
第一次,宽恕。

有时,事实核查:

你真正听到了什么?
某人说了什么?

试图了解某人的意图

,我认为这是第一步

。第二步 是的,


是不能容忍的,

因为它会影响你的成长能力

,它会影响到其他人

正在
采取立场并说“我们不会这样做”

,然后为
不再发生这种情况奠定基础

。CSB:是的,这确实是一个很好的建议。

但我们快到最后了,

所以我 只是要问你最后一个
问题,那就是:

如果你被告知你是
基于情境的焦虑的原因,

你应该做的第一件事是什么?

VPG:如果你被告知你是
基于情境的焦虑的原因,

记住我的脸:不是你,

而是你所处的情况。

相信你的判断 nt,

特别是如果您曾经
经历过一次独奏状态,

那么您又经历了一次。

如果您曾经被刻板印象,

那么您可能

一遍又一遍地经历过这种经历。

所以相信你的直觉,不是你
把偏执带到工作场所

,这些刻板印象
和他者主义是普遍存在的。

我认为这是第一件事。

然后第二件事

在导师和赞助商周围获得这些层次的支持,

他们可以告诉
你你做得很好

,这个环境有问题。

那一层支持
非常重要。

这对每个人都很重要。

但是,如果您是一个应对社会中这些挑战的社会团体的成员,

那么您可以

在创建
强大的社交网络方面寻求的那一层支持,

这是一个关键。

CSB:这太有价值了,瓦莱丽。

非常感谢您
抽出时间与我交谈。

VPG:非常感谢。