Building back better after the pandemic green just economic recovery

do you want to live in a society with

high levels of precarious

unemployment growing levels of

socioeconomic inequality and people

using food banks

but it’s powered by clean green energy

or do you want to live in a society

which has all of those things

powered by fossil fuels or perhaps

you’re somebody like me

who wants both and while certainly the

pandemic has given us an indication of

why we have to learn some of the lessons

now being taught to us in terms of

certainly going beyond carbon as we

build back better

we also need to move beyond capitalism

and in my view beyond

growth the pandemic has cancelled the

future

but that’s okay it was a pretty bad one

anyway

why on earth would we want to go back to

normal

normal was ecocidal normal

was an economic growth system that has

come out of bounds with the planetary

systems that we depend upon the last

time i looked the planet wasn’t growing

yet the human economy whether it’s

capitalist or other is a wholly owned

subsidiary

of the planetary system so how can a

subsystem

the human economy grow beyond the bounds

of the sustainable limits

set by the larger system indeed why

is our economic imaginaries of how the

future can be

thoroughly colonized by capitalism

we can only think in terms of things

like green growth

smart growth circular economy growth

always growth but surely we have to

consider

there’s a threshold beyond which growth

is actually no longer

good for us or the planet

there’s a point beyond which growth as

in organic

materials becomes a form of cancer

cancerous growth why is it indeed

that we can give serious attention to

the ideas of elon musk and colonizing

mars

he’s seen as a visionary as an

entrepreneur with a plan

where people like me who dare to

question capitalism

are viewed as utopian naive

unrealistic or a new one on me painfully

woke when did we seed what is possible

to the parameters of what we currently

have

one would like to think that as we build

back better out of this

pandemic we have to build back

differently

we don’t want to bounce back in some

naive sense of

resilience we want to bounce forward

and my own proposition is that we need

to use the opportunities now

of a crisis being a chance to do things

differently

to put in place the infrastructure not

just for a green

low-carbon economy i’m absolutely

convinced

that the transition to a low-carbon

green economy is now inevitable

but whether it is just or not is not

inevitable and that is a political issue

that we have to contend with why indeed

do we see a lot of discussions

around addressing the planetary

emergency

couched in technological terms

we have serious attention being given to

geo engineering solutions like solar

radiation management

or carbon capture and sequestration

when actually well if i could tell you

we have all the technologies we need

now right here right now

to create a low-carbon economy

it would just require a more equal

distribution

of wealth perhaps a consideration of a

three-day

working week perhaps considering the

democratization

of work and the sphere of production

not easy certainly but these all require

non-technological solutions

so we have to ask ourselves once again

why as we consider

post-pandemic futures do we allow our

economic

imaginaries and the possibilities for

the future

to be constrained by a sense that it has

to be some form

of capitalism capitalism in my own view

is simply biophysically impossible to

sustain

into the future one reason for this

is that for a normal capitalist economy

to remain stable

it needs three percent growth or

thereabouts of gdp

each year that’s a doubling of the

economy

every 25 years or so the reality is

the capitalist economy is like a bicycle

it either goes or grows

or collapses we need to move beyond

this simple system that’s unsustainable

we need to stay within the regenerative

capacities

of the earth and that will require

building

back differently what about greater

focus on collaborative consumption

or socialized consumption like libraries

as opposed to people buying individual

goods and services

greater attention to public

transportation as opposed to private car

automobiles in my own view we need to

seriously consider

the socialization of consumption and

the democratization of production

but these are going to be political

struggles

they will not come about because there’s

an app

for that the reality is as the great

frederick douglass freed

african-american slave

and anti-slavery advocate put it in 1850

power concedes nothing without a

struggle

it never has and it never will

so if we want to build back better and

building back differently

we need this not just signpost where

we’re going

but to see that our future should be one

of posts

post carbon absolutely post growth

because we’ve now passed the stage where

growth is beneficial

to our communities it tells us nothing

about inequality

and certainly post-capitalist because

it’s simply an oxymoron to think

that we can have a growth based

capitalist system

and capitalism is dependent upon annual

increases in growth

and a sustainable world so we need to

build back differently

but we need to build back better

you

你想生活在一个

不稳定

失业率高、社会经济不平等程度越来越高

、人们

使用食物银行

但它是由清洁的绿色能源驱动

的社会中,还是你想生活在一个

所有这些东西

都由化石燃料驱动的社会中 或者也许

你是像我

一样想要两者兼而有之的人,虽然

大流行确实给了我们一个迹象,

说明为什么我们必须学习现在教给我们的一些课程,这些课程

肯定会超越碳,因为我们

重建得更好,

我们也 需要超越资本主义

,在我看来,超越

增长,大流行已经取消了

未来,

但没关系,无论如何,这是一个非常糟糕的情况

为什么我们到底要回到

正常的

正常状态是生态灭绝的正常状态

是经济增长体系已经

到来 超出

了我们所依赖的行星系统的界限,我最后

一次看到地球还没有增长

,人类经济,无论是

资本主义还是其他,完全是一个 o 拥有

行星系统的子公司,那么

人类经济的子系统如何能够超越更大系统设定

的可持续限制的界限

确实

为什么我们对

未来如何

被资本主义彻底殖民的经济想象

我们只能从以下方面思考

诸如绿色增长

智能增长 循环经济增长

总是增长,但我们当然必须

考虑

有一个阈值,超过这个阈值,

增长实际上

不再对我们或地球有益,超过一个阈值

,有机

材料中的增长成为癌症的一种

癌症增长 为什么我们确实

可以认真关注

埃隆马斯克和殖民火星的想法

他被视为一个有远见的

企业家,他有一个计划

,像我这样敢于

质疑资本主义的

人被视为乌托邦式的天真

不切实际或新人 我痛苦地

醒来,我们什么时候播种

了我们目前想要考虑的参数的

可能性 在我们

从这场大流行中更好地重建时,

我们必须以不同的方式重建

我们不想以某种

天真的

复原力反弹,我们希望向前反弹

,我自己的主张是,我们

需要利用现在的机会

危机是一个机会以

不同的

方式建立基础设施,而

不仅仅是为了绿色

低碳经济我绝对

相信向低碳

绿色经济的过渡现在是不可避免的

不可避免,这是一个我们必须解决的政治问题

为什么我们确实看到很多

围绕解决行星

紧急情况的讨论,这些

讨论以技术术语表达,

我们认真关注

地球工程解决方案,如太阳

辐射管理

或碳捕获和封存

实际上,如果我可以告诉你,

我们现在拥有我们现在需要的所有技术

来创建低碳经济

,那么它只需要 更平等地

分配财富 或许考虑

每周工作三天 或许考虑

工作民主化和生产领域

肯定不容易,但这些都需要

非技术解决方案,

所以我们必须再次问自己

为什么当我们考虑

大流行后的未来,我们是否允许我们的

经济

想象和

未来

的可能性受到一种感觉的限制,即它

必须是某种形式

的资本主义,在我看来,资本主义在

生物物理上根本不可能

维持

到未来,原因之一

是 一个正常的资本主义经济

要保持稳定,

它需要每年 3%

左右的 GDP

增长,这就是

经济

每 25 年翻一番左右,现实

是资本主义经济就像一辆自行车,

它要么前进,要么增长,

要么崩溃,我们需要 为了超越

这个不可持续的简单系统,

我们需要保持在地球的再生

能力范围内 这将需要以

不同的方式重建 更多地

关注协作消费

或社会化消费(如图书馆)

而不是人们购买个人

商品和服务

更多地关注公共

交通而不是私家

车 在我看来,我们需要

认真

考虑社会化 消费

和生产民主化,

但这些将是政治

斗争,

它们不会发生,因为有

一个应用

程序,现实就像伟大的

弗雷德里克·道格拉斯释放

非裔美国奴隶

和反奴隶制倡导者在 1850 年所说的那样,

权力丝毫不让步 没有

斗争,

它从来没有,也永远不会,

所以如果我们想重建得更好,

重建得不同,

我们不仅需要这个路标

我们要去的地方,

而且要看到我们的未来应该是

碳排放后绝对增长后的职位之一,

因为 我们现在已经过了

增长

对我们的社区有益的阶段 它没有告诉我们

关于不平等

和后资本主义的任何信息,因为

认为我们可以拥有一个基于增长的

资本主义体系

而资本主义依赖于每年的

增长增长

和一个可持续的世界,所以我们需要

以不同的方式重建,

但我们需要 重建更好的