How the blockchain is changing money and business Don Tapscott

The technology likely to have
the greatest impact

on the next few decades

has arrived.

And it’s not social media.

It’s not big data.

It’s not robotics.

It’s not even AI.

You’ll be surprised to learn

that it’s the underlying technology
of digital currencies like Bitcoin.

It’s called the blockchain. Blockchain.

Now, it’s not the most sonorous
word in the world,

but I believe that this is now

the next generation of the internet,

and that it holds vast promise
for every business, every society

and for all of you, individually.

You know, for the past few decades,
we’ve had the internet of information.

And when I send you an email
or a PowerPoint file or something,

I’m actually not sending you the original,

I’m sending you a copy.

And that’s great.

This is democratized information.

But when it comes to assets –

things like money,

financial assets like stocks and bonds,

loyalty points, intellectual property,

music, art, a vote,

carbon credit and other assets –

sending you a copy is a really bad idea.

If I send you 100 dollars,

it’s really important
that I don’t still have the money –

(Laughter)

and that I can’t send it to you.

This has been called
the “double-spend” problem

by cryptographers for a long time.

So today, we rely entirely
on big intermediaries –

middlemen like banks, government,

big social media companies,
credit card companies and so on –

to establish trust in our economy.

And these intermediaries perform
all the business and transaction logic

of every kind of commerce,

from authentication,
identification of people,

through to clearing, settling
and record keeping.

And overall, they do a pretty good job.

But there are growing problems.

To begin, they’re centralized.

That means they can be hacked,
and increasingly are –

JP Morgan, the US Federal Government,

LinkedIn, Home Depot and others

found that out the hard way.

They exclude billions of people
from the global economy,

for example, people
who don’t have enough money

to have a bank account.

They slow things down.

It can take a second for an email
to go around the world,

but it can take days or weeks

for money to move through
the banking system across a city.

And they take a big piece of the action –

10 to 20 percent just to send money
to another country.

They capture our data,

and that means we can’t monetize it

or use it to better manage our lives.

Our privacy is being undermined.

And the biggest problem is that overall,

they’ve appropriated the largesse
of the digital age asymmetrically:

we have wealth creation,
but we have growing social inequality.

So what if there were not only
an internet of information,

what if there were an internet of value –

some kind of vast, global,
distributed ledger

running on millions of computers

and available to everybody.

And where every kind of asset,
from money to music,

could be stored, moved, transacted,
exchanged and managed,

all without powerful intermediaries?

What if there were
a native medium for value?

Well, in 2008, the financial
industry crashed

and, perhaps propitiously,

an anonymous person or persons
named Satoshi Nakamoto

created a paper where he developed
a protocol for a digital cash

that used an underlying
cryptocurrency called Bitcoin.

And this cryptocurrency enabled people
to establish trust and do transactions

without a third party.

And this seemingly simple act
set off a spark

that ignited the world,

that has everyone excited
or terrified or otherwise interested

in many places.

Now, don’t be confused about Bitcoin –

Bitcoin is an asset; it goes up and down,

and that should be of interest
to you if you’re a speculator.

More broadly, it’s a cryptocurrency.

It’s not a fiat currency
controlled by a nation-state.

And that’s of greater interest.

But the real pony here
is the underlying technology.

It’s called blockchain.

So for the first time now
in human history,

people everywhere can trust each other

and transact peer to peer.

And trust is established,
not by some big institution,

but by collaboration, by cryptography

and by some clever code.

And because trust is native
to the technology,

I call this, “The Trust Protocol.”

Now, you’re probably wondering:
How does this thing work?

Fair enough.

Assets – digital assets like money
to music and everything in between –

are not stored in a central place,

but they’re distributed
across a global ledger,

using the highest level of cryptography.

And when a transaction is conducted,

it’s posted globally,

across millions and millions of computers.

And out there, around the world,

is a group of people called “miners.”

These are not young people,
they’re Bitcoin miners.

They have massive computing power
at their fingertips –

10 to 100 times bigger
than all of Google worldwide.

These miners do a lot of work.

And every 10 minutes,

kind of like the heartbeat of a network,

a block gets created

that has all the transactions
from the previous 10 minutes.

Then the miners get to work,
trying to solve some tough problems.

And they compete:

the first miner to find out the truth
and to validate the block,

is rewarded in digital currency,

in the case of the Bitcoin
blockchain, with Bitcoin.

And then – this is the key part –

that block is linked to the previous block

and the previous block

to create a chain of blocks.

And every one is time-stamped,

kind of like with a digital waxed seal.

So if I wanted to go and hack a block

and, say, pay you and you
with the same money,

I’d have to hack that block,

plus all the preceding blocks,

the entire history of commerce
on that blockchain,

not just on one computer
but across millions of computers,

simultaneously,

all using the highest
levels of encryption,

in the light of the most powerful
computing resource in the world

that’s watching me.

Tough to do.

This is infinitely more secure

than the computer systems
that we have today.

Blockchain. That’s how it works.

So the Bitcoin blockchain is just one.

There are many.

The Ethereum blockchain was developed
by a Canadian named Vitalik Buterin.

He’s [22] years old,

and this blockchain
has some extraordinary capabilities.

One of them is that you can
build smart contracts.

It’s kind of what it sounds like.

It’s a contract that self-executes,

and the contract handles the enforcement,
the management, performance

and payment – the contract kind of has
a bank account, too, in a sense –

of agreements between people.

And today, on the Ethereum blockchain,

there are projects underway
to do everything

from create a new replacement
for the stock market

to create a new model of democracy,

where politicians
are accountable to citizens.

(Applause)

So to understand what a radical change
this is going to bring,

let’s look at one industry,
financial services.

Recognize this?

Rube Goldberg machine.

It’s a ridiculously complicated machine
that does something really simple,

like crack an egg or shut a door.

Well, it kind of reminds me
of the financial services industry,

honestly.

I mean, you tap your card
in the corner store,

and a bitstream goes through
a dozen companies,

each with their own computer system,

some of them being 1970s mainframes

older than many
of the people in this room,

and three days later, a settlement occurs.

Well, with a blockchain
financial industry,

there would be no settlement,

because the payment and the settlement
is the same activity,

it’s just a change in the ledger.

So Wall Street and all around the world,

the financial industry
is in a big upheaval about this,

wondering, can we be replaced,

or how do we embrace
this technology for success?

Now, why should you care?

Well, let me describe some applications.

Prosperity.

The first era of the internet,

the internet of information,

brought us wealth
but not shared prosperity,

because social inequality is growing.

And this is at the heart
of all of the anger and extremism

and protectionism and xenophobia and worse

that we’re seeing growing
in the world today,

Brexit being the most recent case.

So could we develop some new approaches
to this problem of inequality?

Because the only approach today
is to redistribute wealth,

tax people and spread it around more.

Could we pre-distribute wealth?

Could we change the way that wealth
gets created in the first place

by democratizing wealth creation,

engaging more people in the economy,

and then ensuring that they got
fair compensation?

Let me describe five ways
that this can be done.

Number one:

Did you know that 70 percent
of the people in the world who have land

have a tenuous title to it?

So, you’ve got a little farm in Honduras,
some dictator comes to power,

he says, “I know you’ve got a piece
of paper that says you own your farm,

but the government computer
says my friend owns your farm.”

This happened on a mass scale in Honduras,

and this problem exists everywhere.

Hernando de Soto, the great
Latin American economist,

says this is the number one
issue in the world

in terms of economic mobility,

more important than having a bank account,

because if you don’t have
a valid title to your land,

you can’t borrow against it,

and you can’t plan for the future.

So today, companies
are working with governments

to put land titles on a blockchain.

And once it’s there, this is immutable.

You can’t hack it.

This creates the conditions for prosperity

for potentially billions of people.

Secondly:

a lot of writers talk about Uber

and Airbnb and TaskRabbit
and Lyft and so on

as part of the sharing economy.

This is a very powerful idea,

that peers can come together
and create and share wealth.

My view is that …

these companies are not really sharing.

In fact, they’re successful
precisely because they don’t share.

They aggregate services together,
and they sell them.

What if, rather than Airbnb
being a $25 billion corporation,

there was a distributed application
on a blockchain, we’ll call it B-Airbnb,

and it was essentially owned
by all of the people

who have a room to rent.

And when someone wants to rent a room,

they go onto the blockchain
database and all the criteria,

they sift through, it helps
them find the right room,

and then the blockchain helps
with the contracting,

it identifies the party,

it handles the payments

just through digital payments –
they’re built into the system.

And it even handles reputation,

because if she rates a room
as a five-star room,

that room is there,

and it’s rated, and it’s immutable.

So, the big sharing-economy
disruptors in Silicon Valley

could be disrupted,

and this would be good for prosperity.

Number three:

the biggest flow of funds
from the developed world

to the developing world

is not corporate investment,

and it’s not even foreign aid.

It’s remittances.

This is the global diaspora;

people have left their ancestral lands,

and they’re sending money back
to their families at home.

This is 600 billion dollars a year,
and it’s growing,

and these people are getting ripped off.

Analie Domingo is a housekeeper.

She lives in Toronto,

and every month she goes
to the Western Union office

with some cash

to send her remittances
to her mom in Manila.

It costs her around 10 percent;

the money takes four to seven
days to get there;

her mom never knows
when it’s going to arrive.

It takes five hours
out of her week to do this.

Six months ago,

Analie Domingo used
a blockchain application called Abra.

And from her mobile device,
she sent 300 bucks.

It went directly
to her mom’s mobile device

without going through an intermediary.

And then her mom
looked at her mobile device –

it’s kind of like an Uber interface,
there’s Abra “tellers” moving around.

She clicks on a teller
that’s a five-star teller,

who’s seven minutes away.

The guy shows up at the door,
gives her Filipino pesos,

she puts them in her wallet.

The whole thing took minutes,

and it cost her two percent.

This is a big opportunity for prosperity.

Number four: the most powerful asset
of the digital age is data.

And data is really a new asset class,

maybe bigger than previous asset classes,

like land under the agrarian economy,

or an industrial plant,

or even money.

And all of you – we – create this data.

We create this asset,

and we leave this trail
of digital crumbs behind us

as we go throughout life.

And these crumbs are collected
into a mirror image of you,

the virtual you.

And the virtual you may know
more about you than you do,

because you can’t remember
what you bought a year ago,

or said a year ago,
or your exact location a year ago.

And the virtual you is not owned by you –

that’s the big problem.

So today, there are companies working

to create an identity in a black box,

the virtual you owned by you.

And this black box moves around with you

as you travel throughout the world,

and it’s very, very stingy.

It only gives away
the shred of information

that’s required to do something.

A lot of transactions,

the seller doesn’t even need
to know who you are.

They just need to know that they got paid.

And then this avatar
is sweeping up all of this data

and enabling you to monetize it.

And this is a wonderful thing,

because it can also help us
protect our privacy,

and privacy is the foundation
of a free society.

Let’s get this asset that we create

back under our control,

where we can own our own identity

and manage it responsibly.

Finally –

(Applause)

Finally, number five:

there are a whole number
of creators of content

who don’t receive fair compensation,

because the system
for intellectual property is broken.

It was broken by the first era
of the internet.

Take music.

Musicians are left with crumbs
at the end of the whole food chain.

You know, if you were a songwriter,
25 years ago, you wrote a hit song,

it got a million singles,

you could get royalties
of around 45,000 dollars.

Today, you’re a songwriter,
you write a hit song,

it gets a million streams,

you don’t get 45k,

you get 36 dollars,

enough to buy a nice pizza.

So Imogen Heap,

the Grammy-winning singer-songwriter,

is now putting music
on a blockchain ecosystem.

She calls it “Mycelia.”

And the music has
a smart contract surrounding it.

And the music protects
her intellectual property rights.

You want to listen to the song?

It’s free, or maybe a few micro-cents
that flow into a digital account.

You want to put the song
in your movie, that’s different,

and the IP rights are all specified.

You want to make a ringtone?
That’s different.

She describes that the song
becomes a business.

It’s out there on this platform
marketing itself,

protecting the rights of the author,

and because the song has a payment system

in the sense of bank account,

all the money flows back to the artist,

and they control the industry,

rather than these powerful intermediaries.

Now, this is –

(Applause)

This is not just songwriters,

it’s any creator of content,

like art,

like inventions,

scientific discoveries, journalists.

There are all kinds of people
who don’t get fair compensation,

and with blockchains,

they’re going to be able
to make it rain on the blockchain.

And that’s a wonderful thing.

So, these are five opportunities

out of a dozen

to solve one problem, prosperity,

which is one of countless problems

that blockchains are applicable to.

Now, technology doesn’t create
prosperity, of course – people do.

But my case to you is that, once again,

the technology genie
has escaped from the bottle,

and it was summoned
by an unknown person or persons

at this uncertain time in human history,

and it’s giving us
another kick at the can,

another opportunity to rewrite
the economic power grid

and the old order of things,

and solve some of the world’s most
difficult problems,

if we will it.

Thank you.

(Applause)

可能对未来几十年产生最大影响的技术

已经到来。

而且它不是社交媒体。

这不是大数据。

这不是机器人技术。

它甚至不是人工智能。

你会惊讶地

发现它是
比特币等数字货币的基础技术。

它被称为区块链。 区块链。

现在,这不是世界上最响亮的
词,

但我相信这是现在

的下一代互联网,

它对每一个企业、每一个社会

和你们所有人都拥有巨大的希望。

你知道,在过去的几十年里,
我们拥有了信息互联网。

当我向您发送电子邮件
或 PowerPoint 文件或其他内容时,

实际上并不是在向您发送原件,

而是在向您发送副本。

这很棒。

这是民主化的信息。

但是,当涉及到资产

——比如金钱、

股票和债券等金融资产、

忠诚度积分、知识产权、

音乐、艺术、投票、

碳信用和其他资产——

给你发送一份副本是一个非常糟糕的主意。

如果我寄给你 100 美元,

那真的很重要
,我没有钱——

(笑声

) 我不能寄给你。

长期以来,这一直被密码学家
称为“双花”问题

所以今天,我们完全
依靠大型中介机构——

银行、政府、

大型社交媒体公司、
信用卡公司等中间人——

来建立对我们经济的信任。

这些中介执行
各种商业的所有业务和交易

逻辑,

从身份验证、人员
识别

到清算、结算
和记录保存。

总的来说,他们做得很好。

但问题越来越多。

首先,它们是集中的。

这意味着他们可以被黑客入侵,
而且越来越多的人——

摩根大通、美国联邦政府、

LinkedIn、家得宝和其他公司都

发现了这一点。

它们将数十亿人
排除在全球经济之外,

例如,
没有足够钱

开银行账户的人。

他们放慢了速度。

一封电子邮件可能需要一秒钟的时间
才能传遍全球,

但钱可能需要几天或几周的时间

才能
在整个城市的银行系统中流动。

他们采取了很大一部分行动——

10% 到 20% 只是为了
向另一个国家汇款。

他们捕获我们的数据

,这意味着我们无法将其货币化

或使用它来更好地管理我们的生活。

我们的隐私正在受到损害。

最大的问题是,总体而言,

他们
不对称地挪用了数字时代的慷慨:

我们创造了财富,
但我们的社会不平等日益加剧。

那么,如果不仅
有信息

互联网,还有价值互联网——

在数百万台计算机上运行

并可供所有人使用的某种庞大的、全球性的分布式账本,会怎样呢?

从金钱到音乐,每一种资产

都可以在哪里进行存储、移动、交易、
交换和管理,

而无需强大的中介机构?

如果有
一种原生的价值媒介呢?

好吧,在 2008 年,金融
业崩溃了

,也许幸运的是,

一个或多个匿名人士中
本聪(Satoshi Nakamoto)撰写

了一篇论文,在论文中他开发
了一种数字现金协议,该协议

使用了一种
名为比特币的底层加密货币。

这种加密货币使人们
能够建立信任并在

没有第三方的情况下进行交易。

而这个看似简单的举动
却引发

了点燃世界的火花,

让每个人都对许多地方感到兴奋
或恐惧或感兴趣

现在,不要对比特币感到困惑——

比特币是一种资产; 它会上下波动,

如果您是投机者,您应该会对此感兴趣。

更广泛地说,它是一种加密货币。

它不是
由民族国家控制的法定货币。

这更有趣。

但这里真正的小马
是底层技术。

它被称为区块链。

因此
,人类历史上第一次,

世界各地的人们可以相互信任

并进行点对点交易。

建立信任,
不是通过某个大机构,

而是通过协作、密码学

和一些聪明的代码。

由于信任是
技术的固有特性,

我将其称为“信任协议”。

现在,您可能想知道:
这东西是如何工作的?

很公平。

资产——数字资产,如金钱
、音乐以及介于两者之间的一切——

并不存储在一个中心位置,

而是

使用最高级别的加密技术分布在全球分类账中。

当进行交易时,

它会在全球范围内发布

到数以百万计的计算机上。

在世界各地,

有一群人被称为“矿工”。

这些不是年轻人,
他们是比特币矿工。

他们拥有
触手可及的强大计算能力——

比全球所有谷歌大 10 到 100 倍。

这些矿工做了很多工作。

每 10 分钟,

有点像网络的心跳,

创建一个块

,其中
包含前 10 分钟的所有交易。

然后矿工开始工作,
试图解决一些棘手的问题。

他们相互竞争

:第一个发现真相
并验证区块

的矿工将获得数字货币奖励,

在比特币区块链的情况下,比特
币。

然后 - 这是关键部分 -

该块与前一个块

和前一个块链接

以创建一个块链。

每一个都带有时间戳,

有点像数字蜡封。

所以如果我想破解一个区块

,比如说,用同样的钱给你和你

我就必须破解那个区块,

加上之前的所有区块,整个区块

链上的商业历史,

而不仅仅是 一台计算机,
但同时跨越数百万台计算机,

所有计算机都使用最高
级别的加密

,鉴于世界上最强大的
计算资源正在

注视着我。

很难做到。

比我们今天拥有的计算机系统要安全得多

区块链。 这就是它的工作原理。

所以比特币区块链只是其中之一。

有许多。

以太坊区块链
由加拿大人 Vitalik Buterin 开发。

他 [22] 岁

,这个区块链
有一些非凡的能力。

其中之一是您可以
构建智能合约。

听起来有点像。

这是一个自我执行

的合同,合同负责执行
、管理、履行

和支付——合同
在某种意义上也有一个银行账户——

人们之间的协议。

今天,在以太坊区块链上,

有项目正在进行

从创建一个新
的股票市场替代品

到创建一种新的民主模式

,政治家
对公民负责。

(掌声)

所以要了解这将带来怎样的根本性变化

让我们看一个行业,
金融服务。

认识这个?

鲁布戈德堡机器。

这是一台极其复杂的机器
,可以做一些非常简单的事情,

比如打鸡蛋或关门。

嗯,老实说,这让我
想起了金融服务行业

我的意思是,你
在街角的商店刷卡

,一个比特流会
通过十几家公司,每家公司

都有自己的计算机系统,

其中一些是 1970 年代的大型机,


这个房间里的许多人还要老

,三天后,一个 结算发生。

好吧,在区块链
金融行业,

不会有结算,

因为支付和结算
是同一个活动

,只是账本的变化。

所以华尔街和世界各地

的金融业
都在为此发生巨大的动荡,

想知道我们能否被取代,

或者我们如何接受
这项技术以取得成功?

现在,你为什么要关心?

好吧,让我描述一些应用程序。

繁荣。

互联网的第一个时代,

信息互联网,

给我们带来了财富,
但没有带来共同繁荣,

因为社会不平等正在加剧。


是所有愤怒、极端

主义、保护主义和仇外心理的核心,更糟糕的

是,我们
今天看到世界上越来越多,英国

退欧是最近的案例。

那么,我们能否开发一些新的方法
来解决这个不平等问题?

因为今天唯一的方法
是重新分配财富,

向人们征税并将其分散到更多地方。

我们可以预先分配财富吗?

我们能否

通过使财富创造民主化,

让更多人参与经济,

然后确保他们获得
公平补偿来改变创造财富的方式?

让我描述
一下可以做到这一点的五种方法。

第一:

你知道世界上 70%
的人

拥有土地吗?

所以,你在洪都拉斯有一个小农场,
某个独裁者上台,

他说,“我知道你有
一张纸说你拥有你的农场,

但政府的电脑
说我的朋友拥有你的农场。 "

这在洪都拉斯大规模发生,

而且这个问题无处不在。

伟大的拉丁美洲经济学家埃尔南多·德·索托(Hernando de Soto)

说,就经济流动性而言,这是世界上第一大
问题,

比拥有银行账户更重要,

因为如果您
没有有效的土地所有权,

您可以 不要借钱

,你也不能为未来做计划。

所以今天,公司
正在与政府

合作,将土地所有权放在区块链上。

一旦它在那里,这是不可变的。

你不能破解它。

为潜在的数十亿人创造了繁荣的条件。

其次

:很多作家都将优步

、Airbnb、TaskRabbit
和 Lyft 等

作为共享经济的一部分。

这是一个非常强大的想法

,同行可以走到一起
,创造和分享财富。

我的观点是……

这些公司并没有真正分享。

事实上,他们之所以成功,
正是因为他们不分享。

他们将服务聚合在一起,
然后出售。

如果 Airbnb
不是一家价值 250 亿美元的公司,而是


一个区块链上的分布式应用程序,我们将其称为 B-Airbnb

,它本质上
归所有

有房出租的人所有。

当有人想租一个房间时,

他们会进入区块链
数据库和所有标准,

他们进行筛选,帮助
他们找到合适的房间,

然后区块链
帮助签约

,识别当事人

,处理付款

只是通过数字支付——
它们被内置到系统中。

它甚至可以处理声誉,

因为如果她将一个房间
评为五星级房间,

那么那个房间就在那里

,它被评级了,而且它是不可变的。

因此,硅谷的大型共享经济
颠覆者

可能会被颠覆

,这将有利于繁荣。

第三:

从发达国家

流向发展中国家

的最大资金不是企业投资

,更不是外援。

是汇款。

这是全球侨民;

人们离开了他们祖传的土地

,他们正在寄钱
给家里的家人。

这是每年 6000 亿美元,
而且还在增长,

而这些人正在被敲竹杠。

Analie Domingo 是一名管家。

她住在多伦多

,每个月她都会带着一些现金
去西联汇款办公室

将她的汇款汇
给她在马尼拉的妈妈。

这花费了她大约 10% 的费用;

这笔钱需要四到
七天才能到那里;

她的妈妈永远不知道
它什么时候会到。

她每周需要五个
小时才能做到这一点。

六个月前,

Analie Domingo 使用
了一个名为 Abra 的区块链应用程序。

从她的移动设备上,
她寄出了 300 美元。

它直接
进入她妈妈的移动设备,

无需通过中介。

然后她妈妈
看了看她的移动设备

——有点像优步界面,
有阿布拉“出纳员”四处走动。

她点击了
一个五星级的出纳员,

距离他七分钟路程。

那家伙出现在门口,
给了她菲律宾比索,

她把它们放在钱包里。

整个过程只花了几分钟

,花费了她百分之二。

这是繁荣的大好机会。

第四点:数字时代最强大的资产
是数据。

数据确实是一种新的资产类别,

可能比以前的资产类别更大,

比如农业经济下的土地,

或者工厂,

甚至是金钱。

你们所有人——我们——创建这些数据。

我们创造了这项资产,

并在我们一生中留下了这一
数字碎片痕迹

这些碎屑被收集
成你的镜像

,虚拟的你。

而虚拟的你可能
比你更了解你,

因为你不记得
你一年前买了什么,一年前说过什么,

或者一年前你的确切位置。

而虚拟的你不属于你——

这是个大问题。

所以今天,有些公司致力于

在黑匣子中创建身份,

即您拥有的虚拟身份。 当

你环游世界时,这个黑匣子会和你一起移动

它非常非常小气。

它只会泄露

做某事所需的信息碎片。

很多交易

,卖家甚至
不需要知道你是谁。

他们只需要知道他们得到了报酬。

然后这个化身
正在清扫所有这些数据

并让您能够将其货币化。

而这是一件美妙的事情,

因为它还可以帮助我们
保护我们的隐私,

而隐私
是自由社会的基础。

让我们将我们创建的资产

重新置于我们的控制之下,

在那里我们可以拥有自己的身份

并负责任地管理它。

最后——

(掌声)

最后,第五点:


很多内容创

作者没有得到公平的补偿,

因为知识产权制度被破坏了。

它被互联网的第一个时代打破了

拿音乐。

音乐家
在整个食物链的末端留下了面包屑。

你知道,如果你是一个词曲作者,
25 年前,你写了一首热门歌曲,

它有 100 万首单曲,

你可以获得
大约 45,000 美元的版税。

今天,你是一个词曲作者,
你写了一首热门歌曲,

它获得了一百万个流媒体,

你没有得到 45k,

你得到 36 美元,

足够买一个美味的披萨。

因此

,格莱美获奖歌手兼词曲作者 Imogen Heap

现在正在将音乐
放在区块链生态系统中。

她称之为“菌丝体”。

音乐有
一个围绕它的智能合约。

音乐保护
了她的知识产权。

你想听这首歌吗?

它是免费的,或者可能
是流入数字账户的几微美分。

你想把这
首歌放到你的电影里,那就不一样了

,IP权都是指定的。

你想制作铃声吗?
那不一样。

她描述这首歌
变成了生意。

就在这个平台上
营销自己,

保护作者的权利,

而且因为歌曲有

银行账户意义上的支付系统,

所有的钱都流回了艺术家

,他们控制了这个行业,

而不是这些强大的 中介。

现在,这是——

(掌声)

这不仅仅是词曲作者,

它是任何内容的创造者,

比如艺术

、发明、

科学发现、记者。

有各种各样的
人没有得到公平的补偿,

而有了区块链,

他们将
能够在区块链上下雨。

这是一件美妙的事情。

因此,这是

十几个机会中的五个

来解决一个问题,繁荣,

是区块链适用的无数问题之一。

现在,技术当然不会创造
繁荣——人们会。

但我对你

的看法是,技术精灵再次
从瓶子里逃脱,

在人类历史上这个不确定的时期被一个或多个不知名的人召唤

,它给了我们
另一个机会,

另一个机会
改写经济电网

和旧秩序

,解决一些世界上最
困难的问题,

如果我们愿意的话。

谢谢你。

(掌声)