The wicked wit of Jane Austen Iseult Gillespie

Whether she’s describing
bickering families,

quiet declarations of love,

or juicy gossip,

Jane Austen’s writing often feels as
though it was written just for you.

Her dry wit and cheeky playfulness
informs her heroines,

whose conversational tone welcomes readers
with a conspiratorial wink.

It’s even been said that some readers
feel like the author’s secret confidante,

trading letters with their delightfully
wicked friend Jane.

But this unique brand of
tongue-in-cheek humor

is just one of the many feats found
in her sly satires

of society, civility,
and sweeping romance.

Written in the early nineteenth century,

Austen’s novels decode
the sheltered lives

of the upper classes in rural England.

From resentment couched in pleasantries

to arguing that masks attraction,

her work explores the bewildering
collision of emotions and etiquette.

But while romance is a common
thread in her work,

Austen dismissed the sentimental style
of writing so popular at the time.

Instead of lofty love stories,

her characters act naturally,
and often awkwardly.

They trade pragmatic advice,
friendly jokes

and not-so-friendly barbs
about their arrogant peers.

As they grapple with the endless rules
of their society,

Austen’s characters can usually find humor

in all the hypocrisy, propriety,
and small talk.

As Mr. Bennet jokes
to his favorite daughter,

“For what do we live,
but to make sport for our neighbors

and laugh at them in our turn?”

And though her heroines might ridicule
senseless social mores,

Austen fully understood the practical
importance of maintaining appearances.

At the time she was writing,

a wealthy marriage was a financial
necessity for most young women,

and she often explores the tension between
the mythical quest for love,

and the economic benefits
of making a match.

The savvy socialite Mary Crawford sums
this up in “Mansfield Park;”

“I would have everybody marry
if they can do it properly:

I do not like to have people
throw themselves away.”

Unsurprisingly, these themes were also
present in Austen’s personal life.

Born in 1775,

she lived in the social circles
found in her novels.

Jane’s parents supported her education,

and provided space for her to write
and publish her work anonymously.

But writing was hardly lucrative work.

And although she had sparks of chemistry,

she never married.

Elements of her circumstances can be found
in many of her characters;

often intelligent women with witty,
pragmatic personalities,

and rich inner lives.

These headstrong heroines provide
an entertaining anchor

for their tumultuous romantic narratives.

Like the irreverent Elizabeth Bennet
of “Pride and Prejudice,”

whose devotion to her sisters’ love lives
blinds her to a clumsy suitor.

Or the iron-willed Anne Elliot
of “Persuasion,”

who chooses to remain unmarried
after the disappearance of her first love.

And Elinor Dashwood,

who fiercely protects her family
at the cost of her own desires

in “Sense and Sensibility.”

These women all encounter
difficult choices

about romantic, filial, and
financial stability,

and they resolve them without
sacrificing their values–

or their sense of humor.

Of course, these characters
are far from perfect.

They often think they have
all the answers.

And by telling the story
from their perspective,

Austen tricks the viewer into believing
their heroine knows best–

only to pull the rug out from under
the protagonist and the reader.

In “Emma,” the titular character feels
surrounded by dull neighbors,

and friends who can’t hope
to match her wit.

As her guests prattle on and
on about nothing,

the reader begins to agree–

Emma is the only exciting character
in this quiet neighborhood.

Yet despite her swelling ego,

Emma may not be as in control
as she thinks – in life or love.

And Austen’s intimate use of perspective

makes these revelations doubly surprising,

blindsiding both Emma and her audience.

But rather than diminishing
her host of heroines,

these flaws only confirm “the
inconsistency of all human characters.”

Their complexity has kept Austen
prominent on stage and screen,

and made her work easily adaptable
for modern sensibilities.

So hopefully,

new readers will continue
to find a friend in Ms. Austen

for many years to come.

无论她是在描述
争吵的家庭、

安静的爱情宣言

还是多汁的八卦,

简·奥斯汀的作品常常让人
觉得它是为你而写的。

她干巴巴的机智和厚颜无耻的俏皮为
她的女主人公提供了启示,她们

的谈话语气
以一种阴谋的眨眼欢迎读者。

甚至有人说,有些读者
觉得自己是作者的秘密知己,

与他们令人愉快的
邪恶朋友简交换信件。

但这种独特的
诙谐幽默

只是

对社会、文明
和浪漫浪漫的狡猾讽刺中的众多壮举之一。

写于 19 世纪初,

奥斯汀的小说解读

英格兰农村上流社会的庇护生活。

从寒暄中表达的怨恨

到争论掩盖吸引力,

她的作品探索了情绪和礼仪的令人眼花缭乱的
碰撞。

但是,虽然浪漫
是她作品中的一个共同主线,但

奥斯汀
对当时如此流行的感伤写作风格不屑一顾。 她的角色没有

崇高的爱情故事,而是

自然地行事,
而且常常笨拙。

他们交换务实的建议、
友好的笑话


对傲慢的同龄人不太友好的倒钩。

当他们努力应对社会无尽的
规则时,

奥斯汀的角色通常可以

在所有的虚伪、礼节
和闲聊中找到幽默。

正如班纳特先生
对他最喜欢的女儿开玩笑

说的那样:“我们活着是为了什么,
而不是为我们的邻居开玩笑

,轮到我们取笑他们?”

尽管她的女主人公可能会嘲笑
毫无意义的社会习俗,但

奥斯汀完全理解
保持外表的实际重要性。

在她写作的时候

,富裕的婚姻
对大多数年轻女性来说是经济上的必需品

,她经常探讨
神话般的爱情追求

与配对的经济
利益之间的紧张关系。

精明的社交名流玛丽克劳福德
在“曼斯菲尔德公园”中总结了这一点;

“如果他们能正确地结婚,我希望每个人都结婚

我不喜欢人们
抛弃自己。”

毫不奇怪,这些主题也
出现在奥斯汀的个人生活中。 她

出生于 1775 年,

生活在小说中的社交圈
中。

简的父母支持她的教育,

并为她提供
了匿名写作和发表作品的空间。

但写作几乎不是赚钱的工作。

虽然她有化学的火花,

但她从未结婚。

她的环境元素可以
在她的许多角色中找到。

通常是聪明的女性,具有诙谐、
务实的个性

和丰富的内心生活。

这些任性的女主人公

为他们动荡的浪漫故事提供了一个有趣的锚点。

就像
“傲慢与偏见”中不敬的伊丽莎白班纳特一样

,她对姐妹们的爱情生活的奉献使
她对一个笨拙的追求者视而不见。

或者是“劝说”中意志坚强的安妮埃利奥特

,她在初恋消失后选择保持未婚。

还有埃莉诺·达什伍德(Elinor Dashwood),

她在《理智与情感》中以牺牲自己的欲望为代价保护家人

这些女性都会

在浪漫、孝顺和
财务稳定方面遇到艰难的选择

,她们在不牺牲价值观或幽默感的情况下解决了这些问题

当然,这些
角色远非完美。

他们通常认为他们有
所有的答案。

通过
从他们的角度讲述故事,

奥斯汀欺骗观众,让
他们相信他们的女主角最了解——

只是为了从主角和读者的身下拉开帷幕

在“艾玛”中,这个有名无实的角色感觉
周围都是呆板的邻居,

以及
无法与她相提并论的朋友。

当她的客人们喋喋不休地喋喋不休时

,读者开始同意——

艾玛是这个安静社区中唯一令人兴奋的角色

然而,尽管她的自我膨胀,

艾玛可能并不
像她想象的那样掌控一切——无论是生活还是爱情。

奥斯汀对透视的亲密运用

使这些启示倍加惊喜,让

艾玛和她的观众都措手不及。

但这些缺陷并没有减少
她的女主人公,而是

证实了“
所有人类角色的不一致”。

它们的复杂性使
奥斯汀在舞台和银幕上脱颖而出,

并使她的作品很容易
适应现代情感。

因此,希望

新读者能
在未来很多年里继续找到奥斯汀女士的朋友