How your brains executive function works and how to improve it Sabine Doebel

Translator: Leslie Gauthier
Reviewer: Joanna Pietrulewicz

So I have a confession to make.

I only recently learned how to drive.

And it was really hard.

Now, this wasn’t an older brain thing.

Do you remember what it was like
when you first learned how to drive?

When every decision you made
was so conscious and deliberate?

I’d come home from my lessons
completely wiped out mentally.

Now, as a cognitive scientist
I know that this is because I was using

a lot of something
called executive function.

Executive function is our amazing ability
to consciously control our thoughts,

emotions and actions

in order to achieve goals …

like learning how to drive.

It’s what we use when we need
to break away from habit,

inhibit our impulses and plan ahead.

But we can see it most clearly
when things go wrong.

Like, have you ever accidentally
poured orange juice on your cereal?

(Laughter)

Or, ever start scrolling on Facebook

and suddenly realize
you’ve missed a meeting?

(Laughter)

Or maybe this one’s more familiar:

Ever plan to stop at the store
on the way home from work

and then drive all the way home
instead on autopilot?

(Laughter)

These things happen to everyone.

And we usually call it absentmindedness,

but what’s really happening

is we’re experiencing a lapse
in executive function.

So we use executive function
every day in all aspects of our lives.

And over the past 30 years,

researchers have found
that it predicts all kinds of good things

in childhood and beyond,

like social skills, academic achievement,
mental and physical health,

making money, saving money

and even staying out of jail.

Sounds great, doesn’t it?

So it’s no surprise

that researchers like me
are so interested in understanding it

and figuring out ways to improve it.

But lately, executive function has become
a huge self-improvement buzzword.

People think you can improve it
through brain-training iPhone apps

and computer games,

or by practicing it in a specific way,
like playing chess.

And researchers are trying
to train it in the lab

in the hopes of improving it
and other things related to it,

like intelligence.

Well, I’m here to tell you

that this way of thinking
about executive function is all wrong.

Brain training won’t improve
executive function in a broad sense

because it involves
exercising it in a narrow way,

outside of the real-world contexts
in which we actually use it.

So you can master that executive
function app on your phone,

but that’s not going to help you stop
pouring OJ on your Cheeerios twice a week.

(Laughter)

If you really want to improve
your executive function

in a way that matters for your life,

you have to understand
how it’s influenced by context.

Let me show you what I mean.

There’s a great test
that we use in the lab

to measure executive function
in young children

called the “dimensional change card sort.”

In this task, kids have to sort
cards in one way –

like by shape –

over and over until they build up a habit.

And then they’re asked to switch

and sort the same cards in another way,

like by color.

Now, really young kids struggle with this.

Three- and four-year-olds will usually
keep sorting the cards in the old way

no matter how many times you remind
them of what they should be doing.

(Video) Woman: If it’s blue, put it here.
If it’s red, put it here.

Here’s a blue one.

OK, so now we’re going to play
a different game.

We’re not going to play
the color game anymore.

Now we’re going to play the shape game,

and in the shape game,

all the stars go here
and all the trucks go here, OK?

Stars go here, trucks go here.

Where do the stars go?

And where do the trucks go?

Excellent.

OK, stars go here, trucks go here.

Here’s a truck.

(Laughter)

Stars go here, trucks go here.

Here’s a star.

(Laughter)

SB: So it’s really compelling,

and it’s really obvious when she fails
to use her executive function.

But here’s the thing:

we could train her on this task
and others like it

and eventually she’d improve,

but does that mean

that she would’ve improved
her executive function outside of the lab?

No, because in the real world,
she’ll need to use executive function

to do a lot more than switching
between shape and color.

She’ll need to switch
from adding to multiplying

or from playing to tidying up

or from thinking about her own feelings
to thinking about her friend.

And success in real-world situations
depends on things

like how motivated you are
and what your peers are doing.

And it also depends
on the strategies that you execute

when you’re using executive function
in a particular situation.

So what I’m saying is
that context really matters.

Now let me give you an example
from my research.

I recently brought in a bunch of kids
to do the classic marshmallow test,

which is a measure
of delay of gratification

that also likely requires
a lot of executive function.

So you may have heard about this test,

but basically, kids are given a choice.

They can have one marshmallow right away,

or if they can wait for me
to go to the other room

and get more marshmallows,

they can have two instead.

Now, most kids really want
that second marshmallow,

but the key question is:
How long can they wait?

(Laughter)

Now, I added a twist
to look at the effects of context.

I told each kid that they were in a group,

like the green group,

and I even gave them
a green T-shirt to wear.

And I said, “Your group
waited for two marshmallows,

and this other group, the orange group,

did not.”

Or I said the opposite:

“Your group didn’t wait
for two marshmallows

and this other group did.”

And then I left the kid alone in the room

and I watched on a webcam
to see how long they waited.

(Laughter)

So what I found was that kids who believed

that their group waited
for two marshmallows

were themselves more likely to wait.

So they were influenced by a peer group
that they’d never even met.

(Laughter)

Pretty cool, isn’t it?

Well, so with this result
I still didn’t know

if they were just copying their group
or if it was something deeper than that.

So I brought in some more kids,

and after the marshmallow test,
I showed them pictures of pairs of kids,

and I told them, “One of these kids
likes to have things right away,

like cookies and stickers.

And the other kid likes to wait

so that they can have
more of these things.”

And then I asked them,

“Which one of these two kids
do you like more

and who would you want to play with?”

And what I found was that kids
who believed that their group waited

tended to prefer other kids
who liked to wait for things.

So learning what their group did
made them value waiting more.

And not only that,

these kids likely used executive function

to generate strategies
to help themselves wait,

like sitting on their hands
or turning away from the marshmallow

or singing a song to distract themselves.

(Laughter)

So what this all shows
is just how much context matters.

It’s not that these kids
had good executive function or bad,

it’s that the context
helped them use it better.

So what does this mean
for you and for your kids?

Well, let’s say that you want
to learn Spanish.

You could try changing your context

and surrounding yourself
with other people who also want to learn,

and even better if these are people
that you really like.

That way you’ll be more motivated
to use executive function.

Or let’s say that you want to help
your child do better on her math homework.

You could teach her strategies
to use executive function

in that particular context,

like putting her phone away
before she starts studying

or planning to reward herself
after studying for an hour.

Now, I don’t want to make it sound
like context is everything.

Executive function is really complex,
and it’s shaped by numerous factors.

But what I want you to remember

is if you want to improve
your executive function

in some aspect of your life,

don’t look for quick fixes.

Think about the context

and how you can make
your goals matter more to you,

and how you can use strategies

to help yourself
in that particular situation.

I think the ancient Greeks said it best
when they said, “Know thyself.”

And a key part of this is knowing
how context shapes your behavior

and how you can use that knowledge
to change for the better.

Thank you.

(Applause)

译者:Leslie Gauthier
审稿人:Joanna Pietrulewicz

所以我要坦白。

我最近才学会开车。

这真的很难。

现在,这不是一个更古老的大脑问题。

你还记得
你第一次学开车时的感觉吗?

当你做出的每一个决定
都如此有意识和深思熟虑的时候?

我从我的课回家
时精神上完全消失了。

现在,作为一名认知科学家,
我知道这是因为我使用

了很多
称为执行功能的东西。

执行功能是我们有
意识地控制我们的思想、

情绪和行动

以实现目标的惊人能力……

比如学习如何开车。

当我们
需要摆脱习惯、

抑制冲动和提前计划时,我们就会使用它。

但是当出现问题时,我们可以最清楚地看到它

比如,你有没有不小心
把橙汁倒在你的麦片上?

(笑声)

或者,曾经开始在 Facebook 上滚动

并突然意识到
你错过了一个会议?

(笑声)

或者这个更熟悉:有

没有打算在
下班回家的路上在商店停下来

,然后一直开车回家,
而不是自动驾驶?

(笑声)

这些事情发生在每个人身上。

我们通常称之为心不在焉,

但真正发生的

是我们正在经历
执行功能的失误。

因此,
我们每天在生活的各个方面都使用执行功能。

在过去的 30 年中,

研究人员
发现它可以预测

儿童时期及以后的各种好事,

比如社交技能、学业成就、
身心健康、

赚钱、省钱

,甚至不会坐牢。

听起来很棒,不是吗?

因此

,像
我这样的研究人员对理解它

并找出改进它的方法如此感兴趣也就不足为奇了。

但最近,执行功能已成为
一个巨大的自我提升流行语。

人们认为你可以
通过 iPhone 应用程序

和电脑游戏的大脑训练来改进它,

或者通过特定的方式练习它,
比如下棋。

研究人员正试图
在实验室中对其进行训练,以

期改进它
以及其他与它相关的东西,

比如智力。

好吧,我在这里告诉你

,这种
关于执行功能的思考方式是完全错误的。

大脑训练不会
在广义上改善执行功能,

因为它涉及在我们实际使用它的现实世界环境
之外以狭隘的方式锻炼

它。

因此,您可以
在手机上掌握执行功能应用程序,

但这并不能帮助您停止
每周两次在 Cheeerios 上倒 OJ。

(笑声)

如果你真的想以

一种对你的生活很重要的方式来提高你的执行功能,

你必须
了解它是如何受到环境影响的。

让我告诉你我的意思。

我们在实验室中使用了一项很棒的测试

来测量
幼儿的执行功能,

称为“维度变化卡分类”。

在这项任务中,孩子们必须
以一种方式——

比如按形状——

一遍又一遍地对卡片进行分类,直到他们养成一种习惯。

然后他们被要求

以另一种方式交换和分类相同的卡片,

比如按颜色。

现在,真正年幼的孩子们正在为此苦苦挣扎。 无论你提醒他们多少次他们应该做什么,

三四岁的孩子通常会
继续用旧的方式整理卡片

(视频)女人:如果是蓝色的,就把它放在这里。
如果它是红色的,把它放在这里。

这是一个蓝色的。

好的,所以现在我们要玩
一个不同的游戏。

我们不再
玩彩色游戏了。

现在我们要玩形状游戏

,在形状游戏中,

所有的明星都去这里
,所有的卡车都去这里,好吗?

星星去这里,卡车去这里。

星星去哪儿了?

卡车去哪里?

优秀的。

好的,星星去这里,卡车去这里。

这是一辆卡车。

(笑声)

星星去这里,卡车去这里。

这里有一颗星。

(笑声)

SB:所以这真的很有说服力,

当她没有使用她的执行功能时,这真的很明显

但事情是这样的:

我们可以训练她完成这项任务
以及其他类似的任务

,最终她会有所改善,

但这是否

意味着她会
在实验室之外改善她的执行功能?

不,因为在现实世界中,
她需要使用执行功能

来做更多的事情,而不仅仅是
在形状和颜色之间切换。

她需要
从加法转变为乘法,

或者从玩耍转变为整理,

或者从考虑自己的感受
转变为考虑她的朋友。

而在现实世界中的成功
取决于

你的积极性
以及你的同龄人在做什么。

它还
取决于您在特定情况下使用执行功能时执行的策略

所以我要说的
是上下文真的很重要。

现在让我
从我的研究中举一个例子。

我最近带了一群孩子
来做经典的棉花糖测试,

这是一种延迟满足的衡量标准

,也可能
需要大量的执行功能。

所以你可能听说过这个测试,

但基本上,孩子们可以选择。

他们可以马上吃一个棉花糖,

或者如果他们可以等我
去另一个

房间拿更多的棉花糖,

他们可以吃两个。

现在,大多数孩子真的
想要第二个棉花糖,

但关键问题是:
他们能等多久?

(笑声)

现在,我添加了一个转折
来看看上下文的影响。

我告诉每个孩子他们是一个小组,

就像绿色小组一样

,我什至给了他们
一件绿色的T恤。

我说,“你的那组
等了两个棉花糖,

而另一组,橙色的那组,

没有。”

或者我说相反:

“你的小组没有
等到两个棉花糖,

而另一组有。”

然后我把孩子一个人留在房间里

,我用网络摄像
头观察他们等了多久。

(笑声)

所以我发现那些

认为他们的小组
等待两个棉花糖

的孩子自己更有可能等待。

所以他们受到了他们从未见过的同龄人群体的影响

(笑声)

很酷,不是吗?

好吧,所以有了这个结果,
我仍然不

知道他们是否只是在复制他们的小组,
还是比这更深层次的东西。

所以我又带了一些孩子

,在棉花糖测试之后,
我给他们看了几对孩子的照片

,我告诉他们,“其中一个孩子
喜欢马上得到东西,

比如饼干和贴纸

。另一个孩子喜欢 等待,

以便他们可以拥有
更多这些东西。”

然后我问他们,

“你更喜欢这两个孩子中的哪一个,

你想和谁一起玩?”

我发现
那些相信他们的团队会等待的

孩子往往更喜欢其他
喜欢等待的孩子。

因此,了解他们的团队所做的事情
让他们更重视等待。

不仅如此,

这些孩子可能会使用执行功能

来制定策略
来帮助自己等待,

比如坐在他们的手上
、转身离开棉花糖

或唱歌来分散自己的注意力。

(笑声)

所以这一切都
表明背景有多重要。

并不是这些孩子
的执行功能好坏,

而是环境
帮助他们更好地使用它。

那么,这
对您和您的孩子意味着什么?

好吧,假设您
想学习西班牙语。

你可以尝试改变你的环境,


其他也想学习的人在一起,

如果这些人
是你真正喜欢的人,那就更好了。

这样你就会更有
动力使用执行功能。

或者假设您想帮助
您的孩子在数学作业上做得更好。

你可以教她在特定情况
下使用执行功能的策略

比如
在她开始学习之前把手机收起来,

或者计划
在学习一个小时后奖励自己。

现在,我不想让它听起来
像上下文就是一切。

执行功能真的很复杂
,它受到许多因素的影响。

但我想让你记住的

是,如果你想

在生活的某些方面提高执行功能,

不要寻求快速解决方案。

考虑一下上下文

以及如何使
您的目标对您更重要,

以及如何在特定情况下使用策略

来帮助自己

我认为古希腊人
说“了解你自己”时说得最好。

其中一个关键部分是
了解环境如何塑造你的行为,

以及如何利用这些知识
做出更好的改变。

谢谢你。

(掌声)