What percentage of your brain do you use Richard E. Cytowic

An enduring myth says we use
only 10% of our brain,

the other 90% standing idly by
for spare capacity.

Hucksters promised to unlock
that hidden potential

with methods “based on neuroscience,”

but all they really unlock is your wallet.

Two-thirds of the public
and nearly half of science teachers

mistakenly believe the 10% myth.

In the 1890s, William James,

the father of American psychology, said,

“Most of us do not meet
our mental potential.”

James meant this as a challenge,

not an indictment of scant brain usage.

But the misunderstanding stuck.

Also, scientists couldn’t
figure out for a long time

the purpose of our massive frontal lobes

or broad areas of the parietal lobe.

Damage didn’t cause motor
or sensory deficits,

so authorities concluded
they didn’t do anything.

For decades, these parts
were called silent areas,

their function elusive.

We’ve since learned that they underscore

executive and integrative ability,

without which, we would hardly be human.

They are crucial to abstract reasoning,

planning, weighing decisions

and flexibly adapting to circumstances.

The idea that 9/10 of your brain
sits idly by in your skull

looks silly when we calculate
how the brain uses energy.

Rodent and canine brains

consume 5% of total body energy.

Monkey brains use 10%.

An adult human brain,

which accounts for only 2%
of the body’s mass,

consumes 20% of daily glucose burned.

In children, that figure is 50%,

and in infants, 60%.

This is far more than expected
for their relative brain sizes,

which scale in proportion to body size.

Human ones weigh 1.5 kilograms,

elephant brains 5 kg,

and whale brains 9 kg,

yet on a per weight basis,

humans pack in more neurons
than any other species.

This dense packing
is what makes us so smart.

There is a trade-off between body size

and the number of neurons a primate,

including us, can sustain.

A 25 kg ape has to eat 8 hours a day

to uphold a brain with 53 billion neurons.

The invention of cooking,

one and half million years ago,

gave us a huge advantage.

Cooked food is rendered
soft and predigested

outside of the body.

Our guts more easily absorb its energy.

Cooking frees up time
and provides more energy

than if we ate food stuffs raw

and so we can sustain brains

with 86 billion densely packed neurons.

40% more than the ape.

Here’s how it works.

Half the calories a brain burns

go towards simply keeping
the structure intact

by pumping sodium and potassium ions

across membranes
to maintain an electrical charge.

To do this, the brain
has to be an energy hog.

It consumes an astounding

3.4 x 10^21 ATP molecules per minute,

ATP being the coal of the body’s furnace.

The high cost of maintaining
resting potentials

in all 86 billion neurons

means that little energy is left

to propel signals down axons
and across synapses,

the nerve discharges
that actually get things done.

Even if only a tiny percentage of neurons

fired in a given region at any one time,

the energy burden of generating spikes
over the entire brain

would be unsustainable.

Here’s where energy efficiency comes in.

Letting just a small proportion of cells
signal at any one time,

known as sparse coding,

uses the least energy,

but carries the most information.

Because the small number of signals

have thousands of possible paths
by which to distribute themselves.

A drawback of sparse coding
within a huge number of neurons

is its cost.

Worse, if a big proportion
of cells never fire,

then they are superfluous

and evolution should have
jettisoned them long ago.

The solution is to find
the optimum proportion of cells

that the brain can have active at once.

For maximum efficiency,

between 1% and 16% of cells
should be active at any given moment.

This is the energy limit
we have to live with

in order to be conscious at all.

The need to conserve resources

is the reason
most of the brain’s operations

must happen outside of consciousness.

It’s why multitasking is a fool’s errand.

We simply lack the energy
to do two things at once,

let alone three or five.

When we try, we do each task less well

than if we had given it
our full attention.

The numbers are against us.

Your brain is already smart and powerful.

So powerful that it needs
a lot of power to stay powerful.

And so smart

that it has built in
an energy-efficiency plan.

So don’t let a fraudulent myth
make you guilty

about your supposedly lazy brain.

Guilt would be a waste of energy.

After all this,

don’t you realize
it’s dumb to waste mental energy?

You have billions of
power-hungry neurons to maintain.

So hop to it!

一个经久不衰的神话说,我们
只使用了 10% 的大脑

,而另外 90% 的大脑则
闲置着备用。

小贩们承诺

用“基于神经科学”的方法来解锁隐藏的潜力,

但他们真正解锁的只是你的钱包。

三分之二的公众
和近一半的科学教师

错误地相信了 10% 的神话。

1890 年代,

美国心理学之父威廉·詹姆斯说:

“我们中的大多数人都没有
发挥自己的心理潜力。”

詹姆斯的意思是这是一个挑战,

而不是对大脑使用不足的控诉。

但误会一直存在。

此外,科学家们
很长一段时间都无法弄清楚

我们巨大的额叶

或顶叶广阔区域的用途。

损坏并没有导致运动
或感觉障碍,

因此当局得出结论,
他们没有做任何事情。

几十年来,这些部分
被称为静区,

它们的功能难以捉摸。

从那以后,我们了解到它们强调

执行和综合能力,

没有它们,我们几乎不会成为人类。

它们对于抽象推理、

计划、权衡决策

和灵活适应环境至关重要。 当我们计算大脑如何使用能量时

,认为大脑的
9/10 闲置在头骨中的想法

看起来很愚蠢

啮齿动物和犬科动物的大脑

消耗全身能量的 5%。

猴脑使用 10%。

一个成年人的大脑

,只占
身体质量的

2%,每天消耗 20% 的葡萄糖燃烧。

在儿童中,这个数字是 50%

,在婴儿中是 60%。

这远远超出
了他们相对大脑大小的预期,

后者与身体大小成比例。

人类重 1.5 公斤,

大象脑重 5 公斤

,鲸脑重 9 公斤,

但按重量计算,

人类的神经元数量
比任何其他物种都多。

这种密集的
包装使我们如此聪明。

在体型

和包括我们在内的灵长类动物可以维持的神经元数量之间存在权衡

一只 25 公斤重的猿每天必须吃 8 小时

才能维持一个拥有 530 亿个神经元的大脑。

150 万年前烹饪的发明

给了我们巨大的优势。

煮熟的食物变得
柔软并在体外预先消化

我们的内脏更容易吸收它的能量。 与生吃食物相比,

烹饪可以节省时间
并提供更多能量

,因此我们可以

用 860 亿个密集的神经元维持大脑。

比猿猴多40%。

这是它的工作原理。

大脑燃烧的一半卡路里用于

通过将钠离子和钾离子泵入

细胞膜
以维持电荷来简单地保持结构完整。

要做到这一点,大脑
必须是一个能量消耗者。

它每分钟消耗惊人的

3.4 x 10^21 个 ATP 分子,

ATP 是人体熔炉的煤。

维持

所有 860 亿个神经元的静息电位的高成本

意味着几乎没有能量

将信号沿着轴突
和突触推进,而突触

是真正完成任务的神经放电。

即使

任何时候在给定区域中只有一小部分神经元被激发,在整个大脑

中产生尖峰的能量负担也是

不可持续的。

这就是能源效率的用武之地。在任何时候

只让一小部分细胞
发出信号,

称为稀疏编码,

使用最少的能量,

但携带最多的信息。

因为少量的信号

有数千条可能的
路径来分配它们自己。

在大量神经元中进行稀疏编码的一个缺点

是它的成本。

更糟糕的是,如果
大部分细胞从不放电,

那么它们就是多余的

,进化
早就应该抛弃它们了。

解决方案是

找到大脑可以同时活跃的细胞的最佳比例。

为获得最大效率,

在任何给定时刻应有 1% 至 16% 的
电池处于活动状态。

这是
我们必须忍受

的能量极限,才能完全有意识。

节省资源的需要


大多数大脑操作

必须在意识之外进行的原因。

这就是为什么多任务处理是一件傻事。

我们只是缺乏
同时做两件事的精力,

更不用说三五件事了。

当我们尝试时,我们完成每项任务的效果不如

我们全神贯注的情况。

这些数字对我们不利。

你的大脑已经很聪明而且很强大。

如此强大,以至于它
需要很大的力量才能保持强大。

如此聪明

,它已经建立了
一个能源效率计划。

所以不要让一个虚假的神话
让你

对你所谓的懒惰的大脑感到内疚。

内疚会浪费精力。

毕竟,

你不
知道浪费脑力是愚蠢的吗?

你有数十亿个
耗电的神经元需要维护。

所以跳到它!