Why being respectful to your coworkers is good for business Christine Porath

Who do you want to be?

It’s a simple question,

and whether you know it or not,

you’re answering it every day
through your actions.

This one question will define
your professional success

more than any other,

because how you show up
and treat people means everything.

Either you lift people up
by respecting them,

making them feel valued,
appreciated and heard,

or you hold people down
by making them feel small,

insulted, disregarded or excluded.

And who you choose to be means everything.

I study the effects
of incivility on people.

What is incivility?

It’s disrespect or rudeness.

It includes a lot of different behaviors,

from mocking or belittling someone

to teasing people in ways that sting

to telling offensive jokes

to texting in meetings.

And what’s uncivil to one person
may be absolutely fine to another.

Take texting while someone’s
speaking to you.

Some of us may find it rude,

others may think it’s absolutely civil.

So it really depends.

It’s all in the eyes of the beholder
and whether that person felt disrespected.

We may not mean to make
someone feel that way,

but when we do, it has consequences.

Over 22 years ago,

I vividly recall walking into
this stuffy hospital room.

It was heartbreaking to see my dad,
this strong, athletic, energetic guy,

lying in the bed with electrodes
strapped to his bare chest.

What put him there
was work-related stress.

For over a decade,

he suffered an uncivil boss.

And for me, I thought he was
just an outlier at that time.

But just a couple years later,

I witnessed and experienced
a lot of incivility

in my first job out of college.

I spent a year going to work every day

and hearing things from coworkers like,

“Are you an idiot?
That’s not how it’s done,”

and, “If I wanted your opinion, I’d ask.”

So I did the natural thing.

I quit, and I went back to grad school
to study the effects of this.

There, I met Christine Pearson.

And she had a theory
that small, uncivil actions

can lead to much bigger problems

like aggression and violence.

We believed that incivility affected
performance and the bottom line.

So we launched a study,
and what we found was eye-opening.

We sent a survey to business school alumni

working in all different organizations.

We asked them to write a few sentences

about one experience
where they were treated rudely,

disrespectfully or insensitively,

and to answer questions
about how they reacted.

One person told us about a boss
that made insulting statements like,

“That’s kindergartner’s work,”

and another tore up someone’s work
in front of the entire team.

And what we found is that incivility
made people less motivated:

66 percent cut back work efforts,

80 percent lost time
worrying about what happened,

and 12 percent left their job.

And after we published these results,
two things happened.

One, we got calls from organizations.

Cisco read about these numbers,

took just a few of these
and estimated, conservatively,

that incivility was costing them
12 million dollars a year.

The second thing that happened was,
we heard from others in our academic field

who said, “Well, people are reporting
this, but how can you really show it?

Does people’s performance really suffer?”

I was curious about that, too.

With Amir Erez, I compared
those that experienced incivility

to those that didn’t
experience incivility.

And what we found is that those
that experience incivility

do actually function much worse.

“OK,” you may say. “This makes sense.

After all, it’s natural
that their performance suffers.”

But what about if you’re not
the one who experiences it?

What if you just see or hear it?

You’re a witness.

We wondered if it affected witnesses, too.

So we conducted studies

where five participants would witness
an experimenter act rudely

to someone who arrived late to the study.

The experimenter said,
“What is it with you?

You arrive late, you’re irresponsible.

Look at you! How do you expect
to hold a job in the real world?”

And in another study in a small group,

we tested the effects of a peer
insulting a group member.

Now, what we found was really interesting,

because witnesses'
performance decreased, too –

and not just marginally,
quite significantly.

Incivility is a bug.

It’s contagious,

and we become carriers of it
just by being around it.

And this isn’t confined to the workplace.

We can catch this virus anywhere –

at home, online, in schools
and in our communities.

It affects our emotions,
our motivation, our performance

and how we treat others.

It even affects our attention
and can take some of our brainpower.

And this happens not only
if we experience incivility

or we witness it.

It can happen even if we
just see or read rude words.

Let me give you an example of what I mean.

To test this, we gave people
combinations of words

to use to make a sentence.

But we were very sneaky.

Half the participants got a list
with 15 words used to trigger rudeness:

impolitely, interrupt, obnoxious, bother.

Half the participants
received a list of words

with none of these rude triggers.

And what we found was really surprising,

because the people who got the rude words

were five times more likely to miss
information right in front of them

on the computer screen.

And as we continued this research,

what we found is that those
that read the rude words

took longer to make decisions,

to record their decisions,

and they made significantly more errors.

This can be a big deal,

especially when it comes
to life-and-death situations.

Steve, a physician, told me
about a doctor that he worked with

who was never very respectful,

especially to junior staff and nurses.

But Steve told me about
this one particular interaction

where this doctor shouted
at a medical team.

Right after the interaction,

the team gave the wrong dosage
of medication to their patient.

Steve said the information
was right there on the chart,

but somehow everyone
on the team missed it.

He said they lacked the attention
or awareness to take it into account.

Simple mistake, right?

Well, that patient died.

Researchers in Israel have actually shown

that medical teams exposed to rudeness

perform worse not only
in all their diagnostics,

but in all the procedures they did.

This was mainly because
the teams exposed to rudeness

didn’t share information as readily,

and they stopped seeking
help from their teammates.

And I see this not only in medicine
but in all industries.

So if incivility has such a huge cost,

why do we still see so much of it?

I was curious, so we surveyed
people about this, too.

The number one reason is stress.

People feel overwhelmed.

The other reason that people
are not more civil

is because they’re skeptical
and even concerned

about being civil or appearing nice.

They believe they’ll appear
less leader-like.

They wonder: Do nice guys finish last?

Or in other words: Do jerks get ahead?

(Laughter)

It’s easy to think so,

especially when we see
a few prominent examples

that dominate the conversation.

Well, it turns out,
in the long run, they don’t.

There’s really rich research on this
by Morgan McCall and Michael Lombardo

when they were at
the Center for Creative Leadership.

They found that the number one reason
tied to executive failure

was an insensitive, abrasive
or bullying style.

There will always be some outliers
that succeed despite their incivility.

Sooner or later, though,

most uncivil people
sabotage their success.

For example, with uncivil executives,

it comes back to hurt them
when they’re in a place of weakness

or they need something.

People won’t have their backs.

But what about nice guys?

Does civility pay?

Yes, it does.

And being civil doesn’t just mean
that you’re not a jerk.

Not holding someone down
isn’t the same as lifting them up.

Being truly civil means
doing the small things,

like smiling and saying
hello in the hallway,

listening fully when
someone’s speaking to you.

Now, you can have strong opinions,

disagree, have conflict
or give negative feedback civilly,

with respect.

Some people call it “radical candor,”

where you care personally,

but you challenge directly.

So yes, civility pays.

In a biotechnology firm,
colleagues and I found

that those that were seen as civil

were twice as likely
to be viewed as leaders,

and they performed significantly better.

Why does civility pay?

Because people see you
as an important – and a powerful –

unique combination
of two key characteristics:

warm and competent, friendly and smart.

In other words, being civil
isn’t just about motivating others.

It’s about you.

If you’re civil, you’re more likely
to be seen as a leader.

You’ll perform better, and you’re seen
as warm and competent.

But there’s an even bigger story
about how civility pays,

and it ties to one of the most
important questions around leadership:

What do people want most
from their leaders?

We took data from over
20,000 employees around the world,

and we found the answer was simple:

respect.

Being treated with respect
was more important

than recognition and appreciation,

useful feedback,

even opportunities for learning.

Those that felt respected were healthier,

more focused,

more likely to stay
with their organization

and far more engaged.

So where do you start?

How can you lift people up
and make people feel respected?

Well, the nice thing is,
it doesn’t require a huge shift.

Small things can make a big difference.

I found that thanking people,

sharing credit,

listening attentively,

humbly asking questions,

acknowledging others and smiling

has an impact.

Patrick Quinlan, former CEO
of Ochsner Health [System],

told me about the effects
of their 10-5 way,

where if you’re within 10 feet of someone,

you make eye contact and smile,

and if you’re within five feet,

you say hello.

He explained that civility spread,

patient satisfaction scores rose,

as did patient referrals.

Civility and respect can be used
to boost an organization’s performance.

When my friend Doug Conant took over
as CEO of Campbell’s Soup Company in 2001,

the company’s market share
had just dropped in half.

Sales were declining,

lots of people had just been laid off.

A Gallup manager said it was
the least engaged organization

that they had surveyed.

And as Doug drove up
to work his first day,

he noticed that the headquarters
was surrounded by barbwire fence.

There were guard towers
in the parking lot.

He said it looked like
a minimum security prison.

It felt toxic.

Within five years, Doug
had turned things around.

And within nine years, they were setting
all-time performance records

and racking up awards,
including best place to work.

How did he do it?

On day one, Doug told employees

that he was going to have
high standards for performance,

but they were going
to do it with civility.

He walked the talk,
and he expected his leaders to.

For Doug, it all came down
to being tough-minded on standards

and tenderhearted with people.

For him, he said it was all about
these touch points,

or these daily interactions
he had with employees,

whether in the hallway,
in the cafeteria or in meetings.

And if he handled each touch point well,

he’d make employees feel valued.

Another way that Doug
made employees feel valued

and showed them that
he was paying attention

is that he handwrote over 30,000
thank-you notes to employees.

And this set an example for other leaders.

Leaders have about 400
of these touch points a day.

Most don’t take long,
less than two minutes each.

The key is to be agile and mindful
in each of these moments.

Civility lifts people.

We’ll get people to give more
and function at their best

if we’re civil.

Incivility chips away at people
and their performance.

It robs people of their potential,

even if they’re just working around it.

What I know from my research is that
when we have more civil environments,

we’re more productive, creative,
helpful, happy and healthy.

We can do better.

Each one of us can be more mindful

and can take actions
to lift others up around us,

at work, at home, online,

in schools

and in our communities.

In every interaction, think:

Who do you want to be?

Let’s put an end to incivility bug

and start spreading civility.

After all, it pays.

Thank you.

(Applause)

你想成为谁?

这是一个简单的问题

,无论你是否知道,

你每天都在
通过你的行动来回答它。

这个问题将比任何其他问题更能定义
你的职业成功

因为你如何出现
和对待他人意味着一切。

要么你
通过尊重他们,

让他们感到被重视、被
欣赏和被倾听来提升他们,

要么
通过让他们感到渺小、被

侮辱、被忽视或被排斥来压制他们。

你选择成为谁意味着一切。


研究不文明行为对人的影响。

什么是无礼?

这是不尊重或粗鲁。

它包括许多不同的行为,

从嘲笑或贬低某人

到以刺痛的方式取笑别人,

再到讲令人反感的笑话

到在会议上发短信。

对一个人来说不文明的事情对另一个人来说
可能是绝对好的。

在有人
和你说话的时候发短信。

我们中的一些人可能会觉得这很粗鲁,而

另一些人可能认为这绝对是文明的。

所以这真的取决于。

这一切都在旁观者的眼中,
以及那个人是否感到不尊重。

我们可能不是故意让
某人有这种感觉,

但当我们这样做时,它会产生后果。

22 多年前,

我清楚地记得走进
这间闷热的病房。

看到我父亲
这个强壮、运动、精力充沛的家伙

躺在床上,
裸露的胸膛上绑着电极,真是令人心碎。

是什么让他
有工作相关的压力。

十多年来,

他遭遇了一个不文明的老板。

对我来说,当时我认为他
只是一个异类。

但仅仅几年后,

我在大学毕业后的第一份工作中目睹并经历了很多不文明行为。

我花了一年的时间每天去上班

,听同事说,

“你是个白痴吗?
事情不是这样的”

,“如果我想要你的意见,我会问。”

所以我做了很自然的事情。

我辞职了,我回到研究生
院研究这种情况的影响。

在那里,我遇到了克里斯汀·皮尔森。

她有一个理论
,即小的、不文明的行为

会导致更大的问题,

比如侵略和暴力。

我们认为,不文明行为会影响
业绩和利润。

所以我们开展了一项研究
,我们的发现令人大开眼界。

我们向在所有不同组织工作的商学院校友发送了一份调查问卷

我们要求他们写几句话,

讲述
他们受到粗鲁、

不尊重或麻木不仁的一次经历,

并回答
有关他们如何反应的问题。

一个人告诉我们,一位
老板发表了诸如

“这是幼儿园的工作”之类的侮辱性言论

,另一个人
在整个团队面前撕毁了某人的工作。

我们发现,不礼貌
会降低人们的积极性:

66% 的人减少工作量,

80% 的人因
担心发生的事情

而浪费时间,12% 的人离职。

在我们公布这些结果后,
发生了两件事。

一,我们接到了组织的电话。

思科了解了这些数字,

只计算了其中的几个
,保守估计,

这种不文明行为每年使他们
损失 1200 万美元。

发生的第二件事是,
我们听到我们学术领域的其他

人说,“好吧,人们在报道
这个,但你怎么能真正表现出来

?人们的表现真的很糟糕吗?”

我对此也很好奇。

对于 Amir Erez,我将
那些经历过无礼

的人和那些没有
经历过无礼的人进行了比较。

我们发现,
那些经历过不文明

行为的人实际上表现得更差。

“好的,”你可能会说。 “这是有道理的。

毕竟,他们的表现受到影响是很自然的
。”

但是,如果您不是
体验它的人呢?

如果你只是看到或听到它呢?

你是证人。

我们想知道它是否也影响了证人。

因此,我们进行了研究

,其中五名参与者会目睹
一名实验者

对迟到的人做出粗鲁的行为。

实验者说:
“你怎么了?

你来晚了,你不负责任。

你看看你!你还
指望在现实世界中找到一份工作吗?”

在另一个小组研究中,

我们测试了同伴
侮辱小组成员的影响。

现在,我们发现真的很有趣,

因为目击者的
表现也下降了——

而且不仅仅是略微下降,而且
相当显着。

无礼是一个错误。

它具有传染性

,我们
只是在它周围成为它的携带者。

这不仅限于工作场所。

我们可以在任何地方感染这种病毒——

在家里、网上、学校
和我们的社区。

它会影响我们的情绪
、动力、表现

以及我们对待他人的方式。

它甚至会影响我们的注意力,
并且会占用我们的一些脑力。

这不仅
发生在我们经历或目睹不文明行为的

情况下。

即使我们
只是看到或读到粗鲁的话,它也可能发生。

让我举一个例子来说明我的意思。

为了测试这一点,我们给了人们用来造句
的单词组合

但我们非常狡猾。

一半的参与者得到了一个
包含 15 个用来引发粗鲁的词的列表:

不礼貌、打断、讨厌、打扰。

一半的参与者
收到了一个

没有这些粗鲁触发的单词列表。

我们的发现真的很令人惊讶,

因为听到粗鲁话的

人错过电脑屏幕上他们面前信息的可能性要高五倍

随着我们继续这项研究,

我们发现
那些阅读粗鲁话的人

需要更长的时间来做出决定

,记录他们的决定,

而且他们犯的错误也更多。

这可能是一件大事,

尤其是
在生死攸关的情况下。

医生史蒂夫告诉我
,与他一起工作的

一位医生从不尊重他人,

尤其是对初级工作人员和护士。

但史蒂夫告诉我

这个医生
对医疗队大喊大叫的一次特殊互动。

互动后,

该团队立即给患者服用了错误剂量
的药物。

史蒂夫说
信息就在图表上,

但不知何故
团队中的每个人都错过了它。

他说他们缺乏
将其考虑在内的注意力或意识。

简单的错误,对吧?

嗯,那个病人死了。

以色列的研究人员实际上已经

表明,暴露于粗鲁的医疗团队

不仅
在他们的所有诊断中表现更差,

而且在他们所做的所有程序中表现更差。

这主要是因为
受到粗鲁行为的团队

没有那么容易地分享信息,

并且他们不再寻求
队友的帮助。

我不仅在医学上看到了这一点,
而且在所有行业中都看到了这一点。

那么,如果不文明行为付出了如此巨大的代价,

为什么我们仍然会看到这么多呢?

我很好奇,所以我们也就此对人们进行了调查

第一个原因是压力。

人们感到不知所措。

人们不文明的另一个原因

是因为他们持怀疑态度
,甚至

担心文明或表现得很好。

他们相信他们会显得
不那么像领导者。

他们想知道:好人最后完成吗?

或者换句话说:混蛋会领先吗?

(笑声)

很容易这样想,

尤其是当我们
看到一些

主导谈话的突出例子时。

好吧,事实证明,
从长远来看,他们不会。

Morgan McCall 和 Michael Lombardo


创意领导中心时对此进行了丰富的研究。

他们发现,
与执行失败相关的首要原因

是麻木不仁、粗暴
或欺凌的风格。

总会有一些异常
值,尽管他们不礼貌,但他们还是成功了。

然而,

大多数不文明的人迟早会
破坏他们的成功。

例如,对于不文明的高管,

当他们处于弱点

或需要某些东西时,它会反过来伤害他们。

人们不会有他们的后盾。

但是好人呢?

文明有报酬吗?

是的,它确实。

有礼貌并不仅仅
意味着你不是一个混蛋。

不压倒一个人
与举起他们是不一样的。

真正有礼貌意味着
做一些小事,

比如
在走廊里微笑和打招呼,


有人对你说话时,要充分倾听。

现在,你可以有强烈的意见,

不同意,有冲突
或礼貌地给予负面反馈

,尊重。

有些人称之为“激进的坦率”

,你个人关心,

但你直接挑战。

所以,是的,礼貌是有回报的。

在一家生物技术公司
,我和同事

发现那些被视为文明的


被视为领导者的可能性是其两倍,

而且他们的表现要好得多。

为什么文明要付出代价?

因为人们认为你
是两个关键特征的重要且强大的

独特组合

热情和能干,友好和聪明。

换句话说,
文明不只是激励他人。

是关于你的。

如果你是文人,你更有
可能被视为领导者。

你会表现得更好,你会被认为
是热情和能干的。

但是还有一个更大的故事
是关于礼貌如何支付的

,它与
领导力最重要的问题之一有关:

人们最想
从他们的领导者那里得到什么?

我们从
全球 20,000 多名员工那里获取数据

,我们发现答案很简单:

尊重。

受到尊重

比认可和赞赏、

有用的反馈

甚至学习机会更重要。

那些感到受到尊重的人更健康,

更专注,

更有可能留
在他们的组织中

并且更投入。

那你会从哪里开始?

你怎样才能
让人们振作起来,让人们感到受到尊重?

好吧,好处是,
它不需要巨大的转变。

小事情可以带来很大的不同。

我发现感谢他人、

分享信用、

专心倾听、

谦虚地提问、

承认他人和微笑

都会产生影响。 Ochsner Health [System]

前首席执行官帕特里克·昆兰 (Patrick Quinlan)

告诉我
他们 10-5 方式的影响,

如果你在 10 英尺范围内,

你会进行眼神交流和微笑

,如果你在 5 英尺范围内 ,

你打个招呼。

他解释说,文明传播,

患者满意度得分上升

,患者转诊也是如此。

文明和尊重可以
用来提高组织的绩效。

当我的朋友 Doug Conant
于 2001 年接任 Campbell’s Soup Company 的 CEO 时,

该公司的市场份额
刚刚下降了一半。

销售额下降,

很多人刚刚下岗。

盖洛普的一位经理说,这
是他们调查过的参与度最低的组织

当道格
第一天开车上班时,

他注意到总部
被铁丝网围起来。 停车场

里有警卫
塔。

他说它看起来像
一个最低限度的安全监狱。

感觉有毒。

五年之内,道
格扭转了局面。

在九年内,他们创造
了历史业绩记录

并获得了奖项,
包括最佳工作场所。

他是怎么做到的?

在第一天,Doug 告诉员工

,他
将对绩效有很高的标准,

但他们
会以礼貌的态度来做。

他言出必行
,他希望他的领导人能够做到。

对于道格来说,这一切都归结
为对标准的强硬态度

和对人的温柔。

对他来说,他说这一切都与
这些接触点有关,

或者
他与员工的日常互动,

无论是在走廊
、自助餐厅还是会议中。

如果他处理好每个接触点,

他会让员工感到被重视。

道格
让员工感到受到重视

并向他们表明
他在关注的另一种方式

是,他亲手给员工写了 30,000 多封
感谢信。

这为其他领导人树立了榜样。

领导者每天大约有 400
个这样的接触点。

大多数不需要很长时间,
每个不到两分钟。

关键是
在每一个时刻都保持敏捷和专注。

文明举人。 如果我们是文明的,

我们会让人们付出更多
,发挥他们最好的作用

粗鲁会削弱人们
和他们的表现。

它剥夺了人们的潜力,

即使他们只是在解决它。

我从我的研究中了解到,
当我们拥有更多的文明环境时,

我们就会更有效率、更有创造力、
乐于助人、快乐和健康。

我们可以做得更好。

我们每个人都可以更加专注,

并可以采取行动
来提升我们周围的其他人,无论是

在工作中、在家中、在网上、

在学校

和在我们的社区中。

在每次互动中,想想:

你想成为谁?

让我们结束不文明的错误

并开始传播文明。

毕竟,它付出了。

谢谢你。

(掌声)