Apples promise to be carbon neutral by 2030 Lisa Jackson and Liz Ogbu
Transcriber: TED Translators Admin
Reviewer: Mirjana Čutura
Liz Ogbu: So Lisa,
Apple is on target
to become carbon neutral
across its entire business
and manufacturing supply chain
by 2030.
Can you explain exactly what that means?
Lisa Jackson: Sure.
So today Apple is carbon neutral
for all of our own operations.
And we’re running
on 100 percent renewable energy
for our corporate campuses,
for our stores
and for our data centers.
So we know how to do this work.
The challenge for 2030
is to convert our supply chain,
and that work has already begun.
We already have 70 suppliers,
over eight gigawatts
of energy coming online
in our supply chain,
and then our last piece
will be to convert the energy
that our customers use
to charge our devices
to clean energy.
LO: What are some of the biggest changes
that Apple’s going to need to make
in its business operations
in order to be able
to achieve those goals?
LJ: So imagine if instead
of mining material
to go into Apple products,
we actually started
with recycled material.
So we’re not going all the way
back to the mine
through smelting,
transportation, processing.
Instead, we’re really talking
about reprocessing to some degree
and putting that material
right back into products –
super important with things
like conflict metals or rare earths.
So Apple has been doing that work
now for several years.
We’ve actually promised
that we want to make all of our products
out of recycled and renewable materials.
And so that investment
also means we get to take away
all the carbon emissions
associated with everything up until
the point of the recycled material.
LO: So it strikes me that you actually
hold a really interesting perspective.
You know, you’re now at Apple
and, like, deep in the business world
around these things,
but formerly, you actually led
the US Environmental Protection Agency
under the Obama administration,
so you’ve seen
the government side as well.
What, in your mind, is the right way
to look at the respective roles
of the state and the market
in fighting the climate crisis?
LJ: I don’t think there’s anything
that business can do
that replaces the role
of government and leadership.
Yes, I ran the EPA,
but the other part of my history is
I worked there almost 20 years
before I became the head of the EPA.
And you see firsthand, right,
that only government is really charged
with protecting its citizens.
We always think protection,
and we think the military,
but I think the protection
of the Environmental Protection Agency
or the Air Quality Board in California
or a local health department
is as important to the day-to-day life
of the people in that jurisdiction
as anything that the other security-type
protection can provide.
Now, business is a different story.
I think business has an incredibly
important role to play in leading,
especially at this time.
So when Apple said
its goal is 2030 carbon neutral –
obviously the UN is saying
2050 carbon neutral –
we decided to challenge ourselves
to go as fast as we could possibly do it
so that other businesses
wouldn’t have an excuse to say,
“I need longer.
I need much, much longer.”
I think it’s great to see this moment
where suddenly there seems
to be a realization
that climate change policy
cannot be foisted on others,
but that, in fact, it has to be organic,
you know, for lack of a better word.
And it’s not an either-or.
It’s always been this weird, you know,
belief that we’re taught from little
that you can either be successful
or you can do the right thing.
There’s no difference between the two;
it’s a false choice.
LO: Although a lot of us have been talking
about justice for some time,
it is only recently that I think
this idea of justice as it relates
to the environment and climate
is making appearance
in a forum such as this.
You’ve personally described
systemic racism and climate change
as interconnected issues,
and I think it would
be great to hear more.
LJ: To me, they’re just the same thing.
There is no climate justice
without real justice.
There is no climate change remedy
that is going to be made and stick
that doesn’t involve justice.
And sometimes, more and more,
I’m starting to think
that we shouldn’t attack climate change,
we should attack justice and injustice,
and if we did, climate change
would take care of itself.
For me, it’s always come down to
restoring people to the center
of the discussion of solutions
and restoring representation
for the communities
most impacted by climate change
at the table of solution-making.
LO: Well, thank you. I appreciate it.
It’s been a real pleasure
to speak with you today,
and I look forward to seeing
how you advanced the efforts
you talked about.
LJ: And thank you
for the voice you’ve been.
I think it’s super important
that leadership look like us,
but also sound like you.
So thank you.