How to see more and care less The art of Georgia OKeeffe Iseult Gillespie

A canvas drenched in sunset hues,
colors radiating like flame.

At first glance, this painting may appear
to be an impossible, abstract image.

But a closer look reveals
the tender stems,

lush petals and velvety texture
of a Canna Lily.

This metamorphosis of natural subjects
into abstract geometry

is commonplace in the work
of Georgia O’Keeffe—

the revolutionary American painter
and sculptor.

But the magic behind
this transformation remains

just as elusive as the artist herself.

Born in Wisconsin in 1887, O’Keeffe spent
her childhood plucking wildflowers

and arranging fruits to paint.

At seventeen, she moved to Chicago
to study at the prestigious Art Institute.

Her teachers trained her
to faithfully reproduce reality

in the conventions of European masters.

Although she enjoyed the solitude
and precision of this work,

O’Keeffe felt little
personal connection to it.

After moving to New York, she was
increasingly drawn to the clean lines,

striking composition and vivid colors
of Japanese art.

O’Keeffe soon found a teacher
whose lessons inspired her

to put those interests into practice.

Unlike her previous teachers,

Arthur Wesley Dow urged his students
to focus on more abstract representations

of light, shape, and color.

These lessons manifested in O’Keeffe’s
first series of abstract drawings.

Rendered in charcoal, they present
a series of undulating lines,

bold shading and billowing clouds.

These drawings defy easy classification—

suggesting, but never quite matching,
any specific natural reference.

Earlier European painters
in the Cubist tradition

had employed rigid geometry
to abstract external subjects.

But here, O’Keeffe employed
the shapes and rhythms of nature

to capture her internal feelings.

Experiments like these
would soon become a cornerstone

of an artistic movement
called American Modernism.

Although no single style defines
Modernist painting,

its proponents shared a desire
to challenge the realist traditions

that dominated art education.

Beginning in the late 1910’s,
Modernist painting

often used geometric shapes
and bold colors

to probe the American psyche.

O’Keeffe threw herself
into these experiments —

but she was reluctant
to share her new work.

However, when a friend sent her charcoals
to the art dealer Alfred Stieglitz,

he became entranced.

In 1916, he arranged
for a grand exhibition in New York.

This marked the beginning of O’Keeffe’s
career as a popular artist—

and a relationship that would lead
to marriage in 1924.

Marriage didn’t diminish O’Keeffe’s
taste for solitude.

She travelled widely to teach,

and often retreated to paint
for months at a time.

Whether she was exploring
the craggy canyons of Texas,

the quiet forests of South Carolina,
or the sun-bleached desert of New Mexico,

her creative process was based on
ritual and close observation.

She paid meticulous attention
to small details,

and spent hours mixing paints
to create exactly the right colors.

When she found the perfect hue,
she’d record it

in her ever-growing collection
of handmade color cards.

O’Keeffe also experimented
with perspective to celebrate objects

that were often overlooked.

In “Rams Head with Hollyhock,”

she places a weathered skull
and a delicate flower

high above the hills below.

This massive skull overshadows
the landscape,

casting both the skeleton
and the mountains in a new, eerie light.

The public was captivated by her
unique perspective and secretive behavior.

She was particularly praised
for her massive flower paintings,

ranging from fiery poppies
to ghostly calla lillies.

Stieglitz and other critics of the time
were infatuated by Freudian psychology,

and were quick to link these paintings
to female genitalia.

But O’Keeffe dismissed
such interpretations.

She resented the male gaze
that dominated the art world,

and demanded her work be respected

for its emotional evocation
of the natural world.

Eventually, O’Keeffe settled down
in New Mexico,

near one of her favorite artist retreats.

In her 70’s, her eyesight began to fail,

but she continued to mine the landscape’s
mysteries in new, tactile mediums.

O’Keeffe kept creating
until her death at 98,

and is remembered as
the “Mother of American Modernism.”

Decades on, her work retains
its wild energy—

and O’Keeffe her personal mystique.

一幅画布浸透了夕阳的色调,
色彩像火焰一样散发着光芒。

乍一看,这幅画
似乎是一幅不可能的抽象图像。

但仔细观察会发现美人蕉百合
的嫩茎、

茂盛的花瓣和天鹅绒般的
质地。

自然主题
向抽象几何的变形

美国革命画家
和雕塑家乔治亚·奥基夫的作品中司空见惯。

但这种转变背后的魔力

与艺术家本人一样难以捉摸。

奥基夫 1887 年出生于威斯康星州,
她的童年是采摘野花

和安排水果作画。

十七岁时,她搬到
芝加哥,在著名的艺术学院学习。

她的老师训练她

按照欧洲大师的惯例忠实地再现现实。

虽然她喜欢
这项工作的孤独和精确,但

奥基夫觉得
与它没有什么个人联系。

搬到纽约后,她
越来越被日本艺术简洁的线条、

醒目的构图和鲜艳的色彩
所吸引。

奥基夫很快就找到了一位老师,
他的课程启发了

她将这些兴趣付诸实践。

与她以前的老师不同,

亚瑟·韦斯利·道敦促他的
学生专注于

光、形状和颜色的更抽象的表现。

这些教训体现在奥基夫的
第一组抽象画中。

它们用木炭渲染,呈现
出一系列起伏的线条、

大胆的阴影和滚滚的云彩。

这些图纸难以分类——

暗示但从不完全匹配
任何特定的自然参考。

立体主义传统中的早期欧洲画家

使用刚性几何
来抽象外部主题。

但在这里,欧姬芙利用
大自然的形状和韵律

来捕捉她的内心感受。

像这样的实验
很快就会成为

称为美国现代主义的艺术运动的基石。

尽管没有单一的风格可以定义
现代主义绘画,但

它的支持者们都
渴望挑战

主导艺术教育的现实主义传统。

从 1910 年代后期开始,
现代主义绘画

经常使用几何形状
和大胆的色彩

来探索美国人的心理。

奥基夫全身心投入
到这些实验中——

但她
不愿意分享她的新作品。

然而,当一位朋友将她的木炭
寄给艺术品经销商 Alfred Stieglitz 时,

他被迷住了。

1916年,他
在纽约安排了一场盛大的展览。

这标志着
O’Keeffe 作为流行艺术家的职业生涯的开始——

以及
导致 1924 年结婚的关系。

婚姻并没有削弱 O’Keeffe
对孤独的品味。

她广泛旅行教书,

并且经常一次退缩
几个月来画画。

无论她是在探索
德克萨斯州崎岖的峡谷、

南卡罗来纳州宁静的森林,
还是新墨西哥州阳光普照的沙漠,

她的创作过程都是基于
仪式和密切观察。

她一丝不苟地
关注小细节,

并花费数小时混合颜料
以创造出完全正确的颜色。

当她找到完美的色调时,
她会将其记录

在她不断增长
的手工色卡系列中。

奥基夫还尝试
用透视来庆祝

经常被忽视的物体。

在“蜀葵的公羊头”中,

她将一个风化的头骨
和一朵精致的花朵

放在下面的山丘上方。

这个巨大的头骨笼罩
着整个景观,

将骷髅
和山脉投射在一种新的、诡异的光芒中。

公众被她
独特的视角和神秘的行为所吸引。

她因其大量的花卉画作而受到特别赞扬,

从火热的罂粟
花到幽灵般的马蹄莲。

斯蒂格利茨和当时的其他评论家
迷上了弗洛伊德的心理学,

并很快将这些画
与女性生殖器联系起来。

但奥基夫驳斥了
这种解释。

她憎恨主导艺术界的男性凝视

并要求尊重她的作品,

因为它
唤起了自然世界的情感。

最终,欧姬芙

她最喜欢的艺术家静修地之一附近定居在新墨西哥州。

70 多岁时,她的视力开始衰退,

但她继续
在新的触觉媒介中挖掘风景的奥秘。

奥基夫一直在创作,
直到她 98 岁去世,

并被人们铭记
为“美国现代主义之母”。

几十年过去了,她的作品保留了
它的狂野能量——

而奥基夫则保留了她个人的神秘感。