What is McCarthyism And how did it happen Ellen Schrecker

Imagine that one day,
you’re summoned before a government panel.

Even though you haven’t
committed any crime,

or been formally charged with one,

you are repeatedly questioned
about your political views,

accused of disloyalty,

and asked to incriminate your friends
and associates.

If you don’t cooperate,
you risk jail or losing your job.

This is exactly what happened in
the United States in the 1950s

as part of a campaign to expose
suspected communists.

Named after its most
notorious practitioner,

the phenomenon known as McCarthyism
destroyed thousands of lives and careers.

For over a decade, American political
leaders trampled democratic freedoms

in the name of protecting them.

During the 1930s and 1940s,

there had been an active but small
communist party in the United States.

Its record was mixed.

While it played crucial roles in wider
progressive struggles

for labor and civil rights,

it also supported the Soviet Union.

From the start, the American
Communist Party faced attacks

from conservatives and business leaders,

as well as from liberals who criticized
its ties to the oppressive Soviet regime.

During World War II, when the USA
and USSR were allied against Hitler,

some American communists actually
spied for the Russians.

When the Cold War escalated
and this espionage became known,

domestic communism came to be seen
as a threat to national security.

But the attempt to eliminate that threat

soon turned into the longest lasting
and most widespread episode

of political repression
in American history.

Spurred on by a network of bureaucrats,

politicians,

journalists,

and businessmen,

the campaign wildly exaggerated
the danger of communist subversion.

The people behind it harassed anyone

suspected of holding
left-of-center political views

or associating with those who did.

If you hung modern art on your walls,

had a multiracial social circle,

or signed petitions against
nuclear weapons,

you might just have been a communist.

Starting in the late 1940s,

FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover

used the resources of his agency
to hunt down such supposed communists

and eliminate them from any
position of influence

within American society.

And the narrow criteria that Hoover
and his allies used

to screen federal employees

spread to the rest of the country.

Soon, Hollywood studios,

universities,

car manufacturers,

and thousands of other public
and private employers

were imposing the same political tests
on the men and women who worked for them.

Meanwhile, Congress conducted
its own witchhunt

subpoenaing hundreds of people
to testify before investigative bodies

like the House Un-American
Activities Committee.

If they refused to cooperate,
they could be jailed for contempt,

or more commonly, fired and blacklisted.

Ambitious politicians, like Richard Nixon

and Joseph McCarthy,

used such hearings as a partisan weapon

accusing democrats
of being soft on communism

and deliberately losing China
to the Communist Bloc.

McCarthy, a Republican senator
from Wisconsin

became notorious by flaunting
ever-changing lists of alleged communists

within the State Department.

Egged on by other politicians,

he continued to make
outrageous accusations

while distorting or fabricating evidence.

Many citizens reviled McCarthy
while others praised him.

And when the Korean War broke out,
McCarthy seemed vindicated.

Once he became chair

of the Senate’s permanent subcommittee
on investigations in 1953,

McCarthy recklessness increased.

It was his investigation of the army that
finally turned public opinion against him

and diminished his power.

McCarthy’s colleagues
in the Senate censured him

and he died less than three years later,
probably from alcoholism.

McCarthyism ended as well.

It had ruined hundreds,
if not thousands, of lives

and drastically narrowed the American
political spectrum.

Its damage to democratic institutions
would be long lasting.

In all likelihood, there were both
Democrats and Republicans

who knew that the anti-communist
purges were deeply unjust

but feared that directly opposing them
would hurt their careers.

Even the Supreme Court failed
to stop the witchhunt,

condoning serious violations
of constitutional rights

in the name of national security.

Was domestic communism an actual
threat to the American government?

Perhaps, though a small one.

But the reaction to it was so extreme
that it caused far more damage

than the threat itself.

And if new demagogues appeared
in uncertain times

to attack unpopular minorities
in the name of patriotism,

could it all happen again?

想象一下,有一天,
你被传唤到一个政府小组面前。

即使你没有
犯过任何罪行,

也没有被正式指控过,但

你一再被
质疑你的政治观点,

被指控不忠,

并被要求指控你的朋友
和同事。

如果您不合作,
您将面临坐牢或失去工作的风险。

这正是
1950 年代在美国发生的事情,

作为揭露疑似共产主义者的运动的一部分

以其最
臭名昭著的实践者命名,

被称为麦卡锡主义的现象
摧毁了成千上万的生命和事业。

十多年来,美国政治
领导人以保护民主自由为名践踏民主自由

在 1930 年代和 1940 年代,美国

有一个活跃但规模较小的
共产党。

它的记录好坏参半。

虽然它在争取劳工和公民权利的更广泛的进步斗争中发挥了关键作用

但它也支持苏联。

从一开始,美国
共产党就面临

来自保守派和商界领袖的攻击,

以及批评
其与压迫性的苏维埃政权关系的自由派的攻击。

在第二次世界大战期间,当美国
和苏联结盟对抗希特勒时,

一些美国共产党人实际上
为俄罗斯人从事间谍活动。

当冷战升级
并且这种间谍活动广为人知时,

国内共产主义开始被
视为对国家安全的威胁。

但消除这种威胁的尝试

很快变成了美国历史上持续时间最长
、范围最广

的政治镇压
事件。

在官僚、

政治家、

记者

和商人网络的推动下,

这场运动疯狂地夸大
了共产主义颠覆的危险。

它背后的人骚扰任何被

怀疑持有中
左翼政治观点或与那些持有左翼政治观点的人有

联系的人。

如果你把现代艺术挂在墙上,

有一个多种族的社交圈,

或者签署反对
核武器的请愿书,

你可能只是一个共产主义者。

从 1940 年代后期开始,

联邦调查局局长 J. Edgar Hoover

利用其机构的资源
来追捕这些所谓的共产主义者

,并将他们从

美国社会中的任何影响地位中剔除。

胡佛
和他的盟友

用来筛选联邦雇员的狭隘标准

蔓延到全国其他地区。

很快,好莱坞电影公司、

大学、

汽车制造商

以及其他数以千计的公共
和私营雇主

都对
为他们工作的男性和女性实施了同样的政治测试。

与此同时,国会进行
了自己的追捕,

传唤数百人

在众议院非美
活动委员会等调查机构作证。

如果他们拒绝合作,
他们可能会因藐视法庭而入狱,

或者更常见的是,被解雇和列入黑名单。

雄心勃勃的政客,如理查德尼克松

和约瑟夫麦卡锡,

将此类听证会用作党派武器,

指责民主党
对共产主义态度软弱

,故意让中国
输给共产主义集团。 来自威斯康星

州的共和党参议员麦卡锡

因炫耀国务院内
不断变化的所谓共产主义者名单而臭名昭著

在其他政客的怂恿下,

在歪曲或捏造证据的同时继续做出无耻的指控。

许多公民辱骂麦卡锡,
而其他人则称赞他。

而当朝鲜战争爆发时,
麦卡锡似乎被证明是正确的。

1953 年他成为

参议院常设调查小组委员会主席后

麦卡锡的鲁莽行为愈演愈烈。

正是他对军队的调查
最终使公众舆论反对他

并削弱了他的权力。

麦卡锡
在参议院的同事对他进行了谴责

,不到三年后他就去世了,
可能是因为酗酒。

麦卡锡主义也结束了。

它毁掉了数百
甚至数千人的生命,

并大大缩小了美国的
政治范围。

它对民主制度的损害
将是持久的。

很有可能,
民主党人和共和党人

都知道反共
清洗是非常不公正的,

但担心直接反对他们
会损害他们的职业生涯。

就连最高法院也
未能阻止这场政治迫害,

以国家安全的名义纵容严重侵犯宪法权利的行为。

国内共产主义是
对美国政府的真正威胁吗?

也许,虽然很小。

但对它的反应是如此极端
,以至于它造成的伤害远远

超过了威胁本身。

如果新的煽动者
在不确定的时期出现,

以爱国主义的名义攻击不受欢迎的少数群体

,这一切会再次发生吗?