How to reduce bias in your workplace The Way We Work a TED series

Transcriber:

Kim Scott: We all have our biases,

the set of assumptions that we make
and the things we don’t notice

about people’s race, gender, religion,

sexual orientation, appearance
and other traits.

They come from the part of our mind
that jumps to conclusions

that we might not
even be aware that we have.

Trier Bryant: I really can’t tell you

the number of times people assumed
I was a receptionist

when I was an executive at the company.

KS: That kind of bias gets in the way
of good collaboration,

performance and decision making.

TB: It creates an invisible tax
of resentment and frustration.

The more frustrated we are,
the more silent we are likely to be.

And the more silent we are,

the less we may be able
to do our best work.

The good news, though,
is bias is not inevitable.

[The Way We Work]

TB: So here’s how to disrupt
bias in three steps.

The first step is to create
a shared vocabulary.

Sometimes bias shows up in big,
embarrassing gaffes,

but more often it comes out in the little
words and phrases we choose,

which are packed with assumptions.

In meetings, especially, these often
go unnoticed or, even worse,

people notice but don’t know what to say.

That’s why we recommend coming up
with a shared word or phrase

that everyone agrees to use
to disrupt biased attitudes or behaviors.

Examples teams are using
are “bias alert,” “stop light”

or even throwing up a peace sign.

KS: Leaders often ask us
to give them the “right words,”

but the best words are the ones
your team will actually say,

not the ones that leaders impose.

So talk to your team.

My very favorite is the one
that you recommended, Trier:

“purple flag.”

When someone says
or does something biased,

we’ll say “purple flag.”

Maybe we’ll even wave a purple flag.

It’s not a red flag.

It’s a friendly purple flag.

TB: It helps us become more aware
of our blind spots.

KS: Purple flag.

TB: Purple flag.

Thanks for pointing that out.

I’ve been noticing lately
I use a lot of sight metaphors

that often portray disabilities,
like being visually impaired,

in negative ways.

But I’m committed to doing better
and working on it.

KS: I am too.

Another great shared vocabulary trick
is to ask members of your team

to respond to bias with an “I statement.”

An “I statement” invites
the other person in,

to understand things from your perspective
rather than calling them out.

Like, “I don’t think
you’re going to take me seriously

when you’re calling me honey,”

Or “I don’t think you meant that
the way that it sounded.”

Usually, when people’s biases
are pointed out to them

clearly and compassionately,

they apologize and correct
things going forward.

Usually, but not always.

TB: That brings us to the second step:

create a shared norm for how to respond

when your bias is pointed out.

KS: when my bias is flagged,

I can only be glad
that I’m learning something new

if I can move past the shame.

I hate the idea that I’ve harmed someone.

And when I feel ashamed,
I rarely respond well.

So it’s really helpful
to have that shared norm

so that I know what to say
in those moments.

TB: We recommend you start
with: “Thank you for pointing that out.”

It took courage for that person
to disrupt the bias,

so it’s important to acknowledge that.

Then there are two choices
on what to say next.

One, “I get it,”

or two, “I don’t get it.

Could you explain
more after the meeting?”

KS: The other day,

you and I were recording
a podcast and I said,

“HR serves three masters,”

and you waved the purple flag.

I knew what I had done wrong.

Why was I using a slavery metaphor?

We hit pause,

I thanked you, and we rerecorded.

It was no big deal.

The thing I love about the purple flag
is how efficient it is.

TB: Flagging the bias didn’t prevent us
from getting the work done.

In fact, it helps us
work together more honestly.

KS: It’s even harder
when I don’t know what I did wrong.

Once, I asked someone out to lunch.

Out came the purple flag.

I had no idea why,

so I was relieved to know
what to say next.

“Thank you for pointing it out,
but I don’t get it.

Could we talk after the meeting?”

Afterwards, the person reminded me
that they were fasting for Ramadan.

It instantly made sense to me,

and I discovered something
that I could be more aware of.

But to get to awareness,
I had to move through shame.

It was hard to say, “I don’t get it.”

The shared norm helped me listen and learn

rather than getting defensive.

The fact that there was a norm at all

reassured me that other people are making
similar kinds of mistakes

and that we’re all learning together.

TB: Disrupting bias may start off
feeling uncomfortable,

but with time and consistency,

we can build the stamina we need
to push through it.

When it becomes routine
for us to notice our biases,

all of a sudden,
they feel less threatening.

It’s hard to break bias habits,

yet we can change the pattern
with consistent effort.

KS: We’ve got to be patient
with ourselves and with others.

TB: Patient and also persistent.

Which brings us to our last step.

Once a team has come up
with a shared vocabulary

and agrees on the shared norm
for how to respond,

the team should commit to disrupting bias
at least once in every meeting.

KS: If bias isn’t flagged in a meeting,
it doesn’t mean there wasn’t any bias.

It just means either nobody noticed

or nobody knew what to say.

When we are silent about bias,
we reinforce it.

And it can’t be just the targets
of bias who point it out.

Observers and leaders
have got to speak up.

We all have a responsibility.

TB: By making a practice
of disrupting bias quickly and kindly,

we prevent it from metastasizing
into something worse,

like prejudice, bullying,

discrimination or harassment.

KS: Bias disrupters: a shared vocabulary,

a shared norm and a shared commitment

ensure that we notice and learn
from the mistakes that we are all making

so that we can work better together.

TB: When we collaborate,

we use our full capacity as humans
to get more done collectively

than we could ever dream
of accomplishing as individuals.

So let’s stop letting bias get in the way.

抄写员:

金斯科特:我们都有自己的偏见,

我们做出的一系列假设
以及我们没有注意到的

关于人们的种族、性别、宗教、

性取向、外表
和其他特征的事情。

它们来自我们大脑的一部分,
它会跳出

我们
甚至可能不知道我们拥有的结论。

特里尔·布莱恩特:当我担任公司高管时,我真的无法告诉你

有多少次人们认为
我是一名接待员

KS:这种偏见会
阻碍良好的协作、

绩效和决策制定。

TB:它产生了一种无形
的怨恨和挫败感。

我们越沮丧,
我们可能就越沉默。

而我们越是沉默,

我们就越无法
做到最好。

不过,好消息
是偏见并非不可避免。

[我们的工作方式]

TB:以下是如何通过
三个步骤来消除偏见。

第一步是创建
一个共享词汇表。

有时偏见会出现在大而
令人尴尬的失误中,

但更多时候它会出现在
我们选择的小词和短语中,这些小词和短语

都充满了假设。

尤其是在会议中,这些内容往往
被忽视,或者更糟糕的是,

人们注意到但不知道该说什么。

这就是为什么我们建议提出
一个

每个人都同意
用来破坏偏见态度或行为的共享词或短语。

团队正在使用的例子
是“偏见警报”、“停车灯”

,甚至投掷和平标志。

KS:领导者经常要求我们
给他们“正确的话”,

但最好的词是
你的团队会实际说的话,

而不是领导者强加的。

所以和你的团队谈谈。

我最喜欢的
是你推荐的,特里尔:

“紫旗”。

当有人说
或做有偏见的事情时,

我们会说“紫旗”。

也许我们甚至会挥舞紫旗。

这不是红旗。

这是一面友好的紫色旗帜。

TB:它帮助我们更加
意识到自己的盲点。

KS:紫旗。

TB:紫旗。

感谢您指出了这一点。

我最近注意到
我使用了很多视觉隐喻

,这些隐喻经常以负面的方式描绘残疾
,比如视力受损

但我致力于做得更好
并继续努力。

KS:我也是。

另一个很棒的共享词汇技巧
是要求您的团队成员

用“我声明”来回应偏见。

“我声明”
邀请其他人加入

,从你的角度理解事物,
而不是大声疾呼。

比如,“当你叫我亲爱的时候,我不认为
你会认真对待

我,”

或者“我认为你的意思
不是听起来那样。”

通常,当人们

清楚而富有同情心地向他们指出偏见时,

他们会道歉并纠正
未来的事情。

通常,但并非总是如此。

TB:这将我们带到了第二步:

当你的偏见被指出时如何回应建立一个共同的规范。

KS:当我的偏见被标记出来时,如果我能摆脱耻辱,

我只能很
高兴我正在学习新的东西

我讨厌我伤害了某人的想法。

当我感到羞耻时,
我很少做出好的反应。

因此
,拥有这种共同规范真的很有帮助,

这样我就知道在那些时刻该说些什么

TB:我们建议您
从“感谢您指出这一点”开始。

这个
人打破偏见需要勇气,

所以承认这一点很重要。

那么
接下来要说什么有两种选择。

一,“我明白了”

或二,“我不明白。

你能
在会后解释一下吗?”

KS:前几天,

你和我在录制
一个播客,我说,

“HR 服务于三位大师”

,你挥舞着紫旗。

我知道我做错了什么。

为什么我使用奴隶制比喻?

我们暂停,

我感谢你,然后我们重新录制。

这没什么大不了的。

我喜欢紫旗的
一点是它的效率。

TB:标记偏见并没有阻止
我们完成工作。

事实上,它帮助
我们更诚实地合作。

KS:
当我不知道自己做错了什么时,就更难了。

有一次,我请人出去吃午饭。

紫旗出来了。

我不知道为什么,

所以我松了一口气,知道
接下来要说什么。

“多谢指点,
我没听懂,

可以等会后再说吗?”

之后,那个人提醒
我他们正在为斋月斋戒。

这对我来说立刻变得有意义

,我发现了
一些我可以更加意识到的东西。

但要获得意识,
我必须克服羞耻感。

很难说“我不明白”。

共同的规范帮助我倾听和学习,

而不是变得防御。

有一个规范的事实

让我放心,其他人也犯了
类似的错误

,我们都在一起学习。

TB:破坏性偏见一开始可能会
感到不舒服,

但随着时间和一致性,

我们可以建立我们需要
的耐力来克服它。


我们注意到自己的偏见成为常规时,

突然之间,
它们的威胁感就降低了。

打破偏见习惯很难,

但我们可以
通过不断的努力来改变这种模式。

KS:我们必须
对自己和他人保持耐心。

结核病:有耐心,也很顽固。

这将我们带到了最后一步。

一旦团队提出
了共同的词汇

并就如何应对的共同规范达成一致

,团队应承诺
在每次会议上至少消除一次偏见。

KS:如果会议
中没有发现偏见,并不意味着没有任何偏见。

这只是意味着要么没有人注意到,要么没有

人知道该说什么。

当我们对偏见保持沉默时,
我们会加强它。

指出这一点的不仅仅是偏见的目标。

观察员和领导人
必须发声。

我们都有责任。

TB:通过
快速和善意地消除偏见的做法,

我们可以防止它转移
到更糟糕的事情上,

比如偏见、欺凌、

歧视或骚扰。

KS:偏见破坏者:共同的词汇

、共同的规范和共同的承诺

确保我们
注意到我们都在犯的错误并从中吸取教训,

以便我们可以更好地合作。

TB:当我们合作时,

我们利用我们作为人类的全部能力
来集体完成

比我们
个人梦想完成的更多的事情。

因此,让我们停止让偏见成为阻碍。