How fiction can change reality Jessica Wise

Emily Dickinson said over a century ago

that “There is no frigate
like a book to take us lands away …”

And it’s true.

When we pick up a book,
turn on the TV, or watch a movie,

we’re carried away down the currents
of story into a world of imagination.

And when we land, on a shore
that is both new and familiar,

something strange happens.

Stepping onto the shore, we’re changed.

We don’t retrace
the footsteps of the authors

or characters we followed here.

No; instead, we walk a mile
in their shoes.

Researchers in psychology, neuroscience,
child development and biology

are finally starting to gain
quantifiable scientific evidence,

showing what writers and readers
have always known:

that stories have a unique ability
to change a person’s point of view.

Scholars are discovering evidence
that stories shape culture,

and that much of what we believe
about life comes not from fact,

but from fiction -

that our ideas of class, marriage
and even gender are relatively new,

and that many ideologies
which held fast for centuries

were revised within the 18th century,

and redrafted in the pages
of the early novel.

Imagine a world where class,
and not hard work,

decides a person’s worth;

a world where women
are simply men’s more untamed copy;

a world where marriage for love
is a novel notion.

Well, that was the world
in which Samuel Richardson’s “Pamela”

first appeared.

Richardson’s love story
starred a poor, serving-class heroine,

who is both more superior and smarter
than her upper-class suitor.

The book, challenging
a slew of traditions,

caused quite a ruckus.

There was more press for “Pamela”
than for Parliament.

It spawned intense debate
and several counter-novels.

Still, for all those
who couldn’t accept “Pamela,”

others were eager
for this new fictional world.

This best seller
and all its literary heirs -

“Pride and Prejudice,”
“Jane Eyre,” and yes, even “Twilight” -

have continuously shared the same tale
and taught similar lessons,

which are now conventional
and commonplace.

Similarly, novels have helped
shape the minds of thought leaders

across history.

Some scholars say
that Darwin’s theory of evolution

is highly indebted to the plots
he read and loved.

His theory privileges intelligence,
swiftness, and adaptability to change -

all core characteristics in a hero.

Whether you’re reading
“Harry Potter” or “Great Expectations,”

you’re reading the kind of plot
that inspired Darwin.

Yet, recent studies show that his theory
might not be the whole story.

Our sense of being a hero -
one man or one woman

or even one species
taking on the challenges of the world -

might be wrong.

Instead of being hardwired for competition

for being the solitary heroes
in our own story,

we might instead be members
of a shared quest.

More Hobbit than Harry.

Sometimes, of course,
the shoes we’ve been walking in

can get plain worn out.

After all, we haven’t walked just one mile

in Jane Austen’s or Mark Twain’s shoes -

we’ve walked about
100 trillion miles in them.

This isn’t to say that we can’t
read and enjoy the classics;

we should travel with Dickens,

let Pip teach us
what to expect from ourselves,

have a talk with Austen and Elizabeth
about our prides and prejudices.

We should float with Twain
down the Mississippi,

and have Jim show us
what it means to be good.

But on our journey,
we should also keep in mind

that the terrain has changed.

We’ll start shopping around for boots

that were made for walking into a new era.

Take, for instance, Katniss Everdeen
and her battle with the Capitol.

Can “Hunger Games” lead us into thinking
about capitalism in a new way?

Can it teach us a lesson

about why the individual should not
put herself before the group?

Will “Uglies” reflect the dangers
of pursuing a perfect body

and letting the media
define what is beautiful?

Will “Seekers” trod a path
beyond global warming?

Will the life-and-death struggles
of Toklo, Kallik, Lusa and the other bears

chart a course for understanding animals
and our place in their world?

Only the future will tell which stories
will engage our imagination,

which tales of make-believe
we’ll make tomorrow.

But the good news is this:

there are new stories
to venture in every day,

new tales that promise to influence,
to create and to spark change -

stories that you might
even write yourself.

So I guess the final question is this:

What story will you try on next?

艾米莉狄金森在一个多世纪前

说过:“没有一艘护卫舰能
像一本书一样将我们的土地带走……

”这是真的。

当我们拿起一本书、
打开电视或看一部电影时,

我们就会
被故事的潮流带入一个想象的世界。

当我们降落在一个
既陌生又熟悉的海岸上时,就会

发生一些奇怪的事情。

踏上岸边,我们变了。

我们不会追溯

我们在这里跟随的作者或角色的足迹。

不; 相反,我们
穿着他们的鞋子走了一英里。

心理学、神经科学、
儿童发育和生物学领域的研究

人员终于开始获得
可量化的科学证据,这

表明作家和读者
一直都知道

:故事具有
改变一个人观点的独特能力。

学者们正在发现证据
表明故事塑造了文化,

而且我们
对生活的许多看法不是来自事实,

而是来自虚构

——我们对阶级、婚姻
甚至性别的观念都相对较新,

而且许多
世纪以来一直存在的意识形态

在 18 世纪进行了修订,

并在早期小说的页面中重新起草

想象一个世界,一个人的价值由
阶级而非努力工作

决定;

一个女人
只是男人更野性的复制品的世界;

一个为爱而结婚的世界
是一个新奇的概念。

嗯,这就是
塞缪尔·理查森的“帕梅拉”

第一次出现的世界。

理查森的爱情故事
由一个贫穷的服务阶层女主人公主演,

她比她的上流社会追求者更优越、更聪明。

这本书挑战
了一系列传统,

引起了不小的轰动。

对“帕梅拉”的报道
比对议会的报道更多。

它引发了激烈的辩论
和几部反小说。

尽管如此,对于
那些不能接受“帕梅拉”的

人来说,其他人都
渴望这个新的虚构世界。

这部畅销书
及其所有文学继承人——

《傲慢与偏见》、
《简爱》,是的,甚至是《暮光之城》——

不断分享同一个故事
并教授类似的课程,

这些课程现在已成为传统
和司空见惯的事情。

同样,小说帮助
塑造了历史上思想领袖的思想

一些学者说
,达尔文的

进化论很大程度上归功于
他阅读和喜爱的情节。

他的理论优先考虑智慧、
敏捷和对变化的适应能力——

这些都是英雄的核心特征。

无论你是在阅读
《哈利波特》还是《远大前程》,

你都在阅读
启发达尔文的那种情节。

然而,最近的研究表明,他的理论
可能不是全部。

我们作为英雄的感觉——
一个男人或一个女人

,甚至一个
接受世界挑战的物种——

可能是错误的。

我们可能会
成为共同追求的成员,而不是为了成为我们自己故事中的孤独英雄而进行竞争。

比哈利更多的霍比特人。

当然,有时
我们一直穿的鞋子

可能会磨损。

毕竟,我们

穿着简·奥斯汀或马克·吐温的鞋子走的还不止一英里——

我们已经穿着它们走了大约
100 万亿英里。

这并不是说我们不能
阅读和享受经典;

我们应该和狄更斯一起旅行,

让皮普教我们
对自己有什么期望,

和奥斯汀和伊丽莎白
谈谈我们的骄傲和偏见。

我们应该和吐温一起
沿着密西西比河漂流

,让吉姆向我们展示
什么是好的。

但在我们的旅途中,
我们也应该记住

,地形已经发生了变化。

我们将开始四处寻找

为走进新时代而设计的靴子。

以 Katniss Everdeen
和她与国会大厦的战斗为例。

《饥饿游戏》能否引导我们
以一种新的方式思考资本主义?

它能否教给我们一个

关于为什么个人不应该
将自己置于群体之前的教训?

《丑女》会
反映追求完美身材的危险

,让媒体
定义什么是美?

“探索者”会走出一条
超越全球变暖的道路吗?

Toklo、Kallik、Lusa 和其他熊的生死搏斗是否会

为理解动物
和我们在它们世界中的位置指明方向?

只有未来才能告诉我们哪些故事
会吸引我们的想象力,哪些虚构的

故事
我们会在明天制作。

但好消息是:

每天都有新的故事
可以冒险,

新的故事有望影响
、创造和激发变革——


甚至可以自己写故事。

所以我想最后一个问题是:

接下来你会尝试什么故事?