How inventions change history for better and for worse Kenneth C. Davis

Transcriber: tom carter
Reviewer: Bedirhan Cinar

This is the story of an invention that changed the world.

Imagine a machine that could cut 10 hours of work down to one.

A machine so efficient that it would free up people to do other things,

kind of like the personal computer.

But the machine I’m going to tell you about did none of this.

In fact, it accomplished just the opposite.

In the late 1700s, just as America was getting on its feet as a republic under the new U.S Constitution,

slavery was a tragic American fact of life.

George Washington and Thomas Jefferson both became President while owning slaves,

knowing that this peculiar institution contradicted the ideals and principles for which they fought a revolution.

But both men believed that slavery was going to die out as the 19th century dawned,

They were, of course, tragically mistaken.

The reason was an invention,

a machine they probably told you about in elementary school:

Mr. Eli Whitney’s cotton gin.

A Yale graduate, 28-year-old Whitney had come to South Carolina to work as a tutor in 1793.

Supposedly he was told by some local planters about the difficulty of cleaning cotton.

Separating the seeds from the cotton lint was tedious and time consuming.

Working by hand, a slave could clean about a pound of cotton a day.

But the Industrial Revolution was underway,

and the demand was increasing.

Large mills in Great Britain and New England were hungry for cotton to mass produce cloth.

As the story was told, Whitney had a “eureka moment” and invented the gin, short for engine.

The truth is that the cotton gin already existed for centuries in small but inefficient forms.

In 1794, Whitney simply improved upon the existing gins and then patented his “invention”:

a small machine that employed a set of cones that could separate seeds from lint mechanically,

as a crank was turned.

With it, a single worker could eventually clean from 300 to one thousand pounds of cotton a day.

In 1790, about 3,000 bales of cotton were produced in America each year.

A bale was equal to about 500 pounds.

By 1801, with the spread of the cotton gin,

cotton production grew to 100 thousand bales a year.

After the destructions of the War of 1812,

production reached 400 thousand bales a year.

As America was expanding through the land acquired in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803,

yearly production exploded to four million bales. Cotton was king.

It exceeded the value of all other American products combined,

about three fifths of America’s economic output.

But instead of reducing the need for labor, the cotton gin propelled it,

as more slaves were needed to plant and harvest king cotton.

The cotton gin and the demand of Northern and English factories re-charted the course of American slavery.

In 1790, America’s first official census counted nearly 700 thousand slaves.

By 1810, two years after the slave trade was banned in America,

the number had shot up to more than one million.

During the next 50 years, that number exploded to nearly four million slaves in 1860,

the eve of the Civil War.

As for Whitney, he suffered the fate of many an inventor.

Despite his patent, other planters easily built copies of his machine, or made improvements of their own.

You might say his design was pirated.

Whitney made very little money from the device that transformed America.

But to the bigger picture, and the larger questions.

What should we make of the cotton gin?

History has proven that inventions can be double-edged swords.

They often carry unintended consequences.

The factories of the Industrial Revolution spurred innovation and an economic boom in America.

But they also depended on child labor,

and led to tragedies like the Triangle Shirtwaist fire that killed more than 100 women in 1911.

Disposable diapers made life easy for parents,

but they killed off diaper delivery services.

And do we want landfills overwhelmed by dirty diapers?

And of course, Einstein’s extraordinary equation opened a world of possibilities.

But what if one of them is Hiroshima?

抄写员:tom carter
审稿人:Bedirhan Cinar

这是一个改变世界的发明的故事。

想象一台机器可以将 10 小时的工作时间缩短到一个小时。

一台效率如此之高的机器,它可以让人们腾出时间去做其他事情,

有点像个人电脑。

但是我要告诉你的机器并没有做到这一点。

事实上,它完成的恰恰相反。

在 1700 年代后期,正如美国在新的美国宪法下作为共和国站稳脚跟一样,

奴隶制是美国生活中的悲惨事实。

乔治华盛顿和托马斯杰斐逊都在拥有奴隶的同时成为总统,他们

知道这个特殊的机构与他们为之奋斗的理想和原则相矛盾。

但两人都认为,随着 19 世纪的到来,奴隶制将会消亡

。当然,他们犯了悲惨的错误。

原因是一项发明,

一种他们可能在小学时告诉过你的机器:

伊莱·惠特尼先生的轧棉机。

耶鲁大学毕业生、28 岁的惠特尼 1793 年来到南卡罗来纳州担任家庭教师。

据说当地一些种植者告诉他清洁棉花的困难。

从棉绒中分离种子既繁琐又耗时。

手工劳动,一个奴隶每天可以清理大约一磅棉花。

但工业革命正在进行中

,需求正在增加。

英国和新英格兰的大型纺织厂迫切需要棉花来大规模生产布匹。

正如故事所说,惠特尼有一个“灵光乍现的时刻”并发明了杜松子酒,是发动机的缩写。

事实是,轧棉机已经以小型但低效的形式存在了几个世纪。

1794 年,惠特尼简单地改进了现有的杜松子酒,然后为他的“发明”申请了专利:

一种小型机器,它使用一组锥体,可以在转动曲柄时机械地分离种子和皮棉

有了它,一个工人最终可以每天清理 300 到 1000 磅棉花。

1790 年,美国每年生产大约 3,000 包棉花。

一包约等于 500 磅。

到 1801 年,随着轧棉机的普及,

棉花产量增长到每年 10 万包。

在 1812 年战争的破坏之后,

年产量达到 40 万包。

随着美国在 1803 年路易斯安那购地中获得的土地进行扩张,

年产量激增至 400 万包。 棉花为王。

它超过了所有其他美国产品的总和,

约占美国经济产出的五分之三。

但轧棉机并没有减少对劳动力的需求,而是推动了它的发展,

因为需要更多的奴隶来种植和收获特级棉花。

轧棉机以及北方和英国工厂的需求重新描绘了美国奴隶制的进程。

1790 年,美国第一次官方人口普查统计了近 70 万奴隶。

到 1810 年,也就是美国禁止奴隶贸易两年后,

这一数字已飙升至超过 100 万。

在接下来的 50 年中,这一数字在 1860 年内战前夕激增至近 400 万

至于惠特尼,他遭受了许多发明家的命运。

尽管有他的专利,其他种植者很容易复制他的机器,或者自己改进。

你可能会说他的设计是盗版的。

惠特尼从改变美国的设备中赚到的钱很少。

但是对于更大的图景和更大的问题。

我们应该如何处理轧棉机?

历史证明,发明可以是双刃剑。

它们经常带来意想不到的后果。

工业革命的工厂刺激了美国的创新和经济繁荣。

但他们也依赖童工,

并导致了像 1911 年导致 100 多名妇女死亡的三角衬衫腰大火这样的悲剧。

一次性尿布让父母的生活变得轻松,

但他们扼杀了尿布送货服务。

我们是否希望垃圾填埋场被脏尿布淹没?

当然,爱因斯坦非凡的方程式打开了一个充满可能性的世界。

但如果其中之一是广岛呢?