What it takes to make change Jacqueline Novogratz

A few years ago,
I found myself in Kigali, Rwanda

presenting a plan to bring
off-grid solar electricity

to 10 million low-income East Africans.

As I waited to speak
to the president and his ministers,

I thought about how I’d arrived
in that same place 30 years before.

A 25-year-old who left
her career in banking

to cofound the nation’s first
microfinance bank

with a small group of Rwandan women.

And that happened just a few months
after women had gained the right

to open a bank account
without their husband’s signature.

Just before I got on stage,

a young woman approached me.

“Ms. Novogratz,” she said,

“I think you knew my auntie.”

“Really?

What was her name?”

She said, “Felicula.”

I could feel tears well.

One of the first women
parliamentarians in the country,

Felicula was a cofounder,

but soon after we’d established the bank,

Felicula was killed
in a mysterious hit-and-run accident.

Some associated her death
to a policy she had sponsored

to abolish bride price,

or the practice of paying a man
for the hand of his daughter in marriage.

I was devastated by her death.

And then a few years after that,

after I’d left the country,

Rwanda exploded in genocide.

And I have to admit there were times

when I thought about
all the work so many had done,

and I wondered what it had amounted to.

I turned back to the woman.

“I’m sorry, would you tell me
who you are again?”

She said, “Yes, my name is Monique,

and I’m the deputy governor
of Rwanda’s National Bank.”

If you had told me
when we were just getting started

that within a single generation,

a young woman will go on to help lead
her nation’s financial sector,

I’m not sure I would have believed you.

And I understood
that I was back in that same place

to continue work Felicula had started
but could not complete in her lifetime.

And that it was to me to recommit

to dreams so big I might
not complete them in mine.

That night I decided to write
a letter to the next generation

because so many have passed on
their wisdom and knowledge to me,

because I feel a growing sense of urgency

that I might not finish
the work I came to do,

and because I want to pass that forward

to everyone who wants
to create change in this world

in ways that only they can do.

That generation is in the streets.

They are crying urgently
for wholesale change

against racial injustice,

religious and ethnic persecution,

catastrophic climate change

and the cruel inequality
that has left us more divided

and divisive than ever in my lifetime.

But what would I say to them?

I’m a builder, so I started
by focusing on technical fixes,

but our problems are too interdependent,

too entangled.

We need more than a system shift.

We need a mind shift.

Plato wrote that a country
cultivates what it honors.

For too long, we have defined success
based on money, power and fame.

Now we have to start the hard,
long work of moral revolution.

By that I mean putting our shared humanity

and the sustainability of the earth
at the center of our systems,

and prioritizing the collective we,

not the individual I.

What if each of us gave more
to the world than we took from it?

Everything would change.

Now cynics might say
that sounds too idealistic,

but cynics don’t create the future.

And though I’ve learned the folly
of unbridled optimism,

I stand with those
who hold to hard-edged hope.

I know that change is possible.

The entrepreneurs and change agents
with whom my team and I have worked

have impacted more than 300 million
low-income people,

and sometimes reshaped
entire sectors to include the poor.

But you can’t really talk
about moral revolution

without grounding it
in practicality and meaning,

and that requires an entirely
new set of operating principles.

Let me share just three.

The first is moral imagination.

Too often we use the lens
only of our own imagination,

even when designing solutions

for people whose lives
are completely different from our own.

Moral imagination starts by seeing
others as equal to ourselves,

neither above nor below us,

neither idealizing nor victimizing.

It requires immersing
in the lives of others,

understanding the structures
that get in their way

and being honest about where
they might be holding themselves back.

That requires deep listening
from a place of inquiry,

not certainty.

Several years ago I sat
with a group of women weavers

outside in a rural village in Pakistan.

The day was hot …

over 120 degrees in the shade.

I wanted to tell the women about
a company my organization had invested in

that was bringing solar light to millions
of people across India and East Africa,

and I had seen the transformative
power of that light

to allow people to do things
so many of us just take for granted.

“We have this light” I said,

“costs about seven dollars.

People say it’s amazing.

If we could convince the company
to bring those products to Pakistan,

would you all be interested?”

The women stared,

and then a big woman whose hands
knew hard work looked at me,

wiped the sweat off her face and said,

“We don’t want a light.

We’re hot.

Bring us a fan.”

“Fan,” I said.

“We don’t have a fan.

We have a light.

But if you had this light,
your kids can study at night,

you can work more – "

She cut me off.

“We work enough. We’re hot.

Bring us a fan.”

That straight-talking conversation
deepened my moral imagination.

And I remember lying –

sweltering in my bed
in my tiny guest house that night,

so grateful for the clickety-clack
of the fan overhead.

And I thought, “Of course.

Electricity.

A fan.

Dignity.”

And when I now visit our companies

who’ve reached over 100 million people
with light and electricity

and it’s a really hot place,

and if there’s a rooftop system,

there is also a fan.

But moral imagination is also needed
to rebuild and heal our countries.

My nation is roiling
as it finally confronts

what it’s not wanted to see.

It would be impossible to deny
the legacy of American slavery

if all of us truly immersed
in the lives of Black people.

Every nation begins the process of healing

when its people begin to see each other

and to understand that it is in that work
that are planted the seeds

of our individual
and collective transformation.

Now that requires acknowledging
the light and shadow,

the good and evil that exist
in every human being.

In our world we have to learn
to partner with those

even whom we consider our adversaries.

This leads to the second principle:

holding opposing values in tension.

Too many of our leaders today
stand on one corner or the other,

shouting.

Moral leaders reject
the wall of either-or.

They’re willing to acknowledge a truth
or even a partial truth

in what the other side believes.

And they gain trust
by making principled decisions

in service of other people,

not themselves.

To succeed in my work
has required holding the tension

between the power of markets
to enable innovation and prosperity

and their peril to allow for exclusion

and sometimes exploitation.

Those who see the sole purpose
of business as profit

are not comfortable with that tension,

nor are those who have
no trust in business at all.

But standing on either side
negates the creative, generative potential

of learning to use markets
without being seduced by them.

Take chocolate.

It’s a hundred-billion-dollar industry

dependent on the labor of about
five million smallholder farming families

who receive only a tiny fraction
of that 100 billion.

In fact, 90 percent of them
make under two dollars a day.

But there’s a generation
of new entrepreneurs

that is trying to change that.

They start by understanding
the production costs of the farmers.

They agree to a price that allows
the farmers to actually earn income

in a way that will sustain their lives.

Sometimes including revenue-share
and ownership models,

building a community of trust.

Now are these companies as profitable

as those that focus
solely on shareholder value?

Possibly not in the short term.

But these entrepreneurs
are focused on solving problems.

They’re tired of easy slogans
like “doing well by doing good.”

They know they have to be
financially sustainable,

and they are insisting on including
the poor and the vulnerable

in their definition of success.

And that brings me to the third principle:

accompaniment.

It’s actually a Jesuit term
that means to walk alongside:

I’ll hold a mirror to you,
help you see your potential,

maybe more than you see it yourself.

I’ll take on your problem
but I can’t solve it for you –

that you have to learn to do.

For example, in Harlem
there’s an organization

called City Health Works

that hires local residents

with no previous health care experience,

trains them to work with other residents

so that they can better control
chronic diseases like gout,

hypertension, diabetes.

I had the great pleasure
of meeting Destini Belton,

one of the health workers,

who explained her job to me.

She said that she checks in on clients,

checks their vital signs,

takes them grocery shopping,

goes on long walks,

has conversations.

She told me, “I let them know
somebody has their back.”

And the results have been astounding.

Patients are healthier,
hospitals less burdened.

As for Destini,

she tells me her family
and she are healthier.

“And,” she adds, “I love that I get
to contribute to my community.”

All of us yearn to be seen,

to count.

The work of change,

of moral revolution,

is hard.

But we don’t change in the easy times.

We change in the difficult times.

In fact, I’ve come to see discomfort
as a proxy for progress.

But there’s one more thing.

There’s something I wish I’d known
when I was just starting out

so many years ago.

No matter how hard it gets,

there’s always beauty to be found.

I remember now what seems a long time ago,

spending an entire day
talking to woman after woman

in the Mathare Valley slum
in Nairobi, Kenya.

I listened to their stories
of struggle and survival

as they talked about losing children,

of fighting violence and hunger,

sometimes feeling
like they wouldn’t even survive.

And right before I left,

a huge rainstorm poured down.

And I was sitting in my little car
as the wheels stuck in the mud

thinking, “I’m never getting out of here,”

when suddenly there was
a tap on my window –

a woman who was beckoning
me to follow her,

and I did.

Jumped out through the rainstorm,

we went down this little muddy path,

through a rickety metal door,

inside a shack

where a group of women
were dancing with abandon.

I jumped in and found myself lost
in the rhythm and the color and the smiles

and suddenly I realized:

this is what we do as human beings.

When we’re broken,

when we feel that we are failing
or are in despair,

we dance.

We sing.

We pray.

Beauty resides too in showing up,

in paying attention,

in being kind when we feel
like being anything but kind.

Look at the explosion of art
and music and poetry

in this moment of our collective crisis.

It is in the darkest times

that we have the chance
to find our deepest beauty.

So let this be our moment

to move forward

with the fierce urgency
of a new generation

fortified with our most profound
and collective wisdom.

And ask yourself:

what can you do with the rest of today

and the rest of your life

to give back more
to the world than you take?

Thank you.

几年前,
我发现自己在卢旺达的基加利,

提出了一项

为 1000 万低收入东非人提供离网太阳能发电的计划。

当我等待
与总统和他的部长们交谈时,

我想到了 30 年前我是如何
到达同一个地方的。

一位 25 岁的女士离开
了银行业

,与一小群卢旺达妇女共同创立了全国第一家
小额信贷银行

而这仅仅发生
在女性获得无需丈夫签名

即可开立银行账户的权利的几个月后

就在我上台之前,

一位年轻的女士向我走来。

“诺沃格拉茨女士,”她说,

“我想你认识我的阿姨。”

“真的吗

?她叫什么名字?”

她说:“费利库拉。”

我能很好地感觉到眼泪。

作为该国首批女
议员之一,

Felicula 是联合创始人,

但在我们成立银行后不久,

Felicula
在一次神秘的肇事逃逸事故中丧生。

一些人将她的死与她发起的废除彩礼的政策联系起来,或者将她的死
与她

在婚姻中为女儿的手付钱给男人的做法联系在一起。

我对她的死感到震惊。

几年后,

在我离开这个国家之后,

卢旺达爆发了种族灭绝。

我不得不承认,

有时我会想到
这么多人所做的所有工作

,我想知道它到底是什么。

我转身面对那个女人。

“对不起,你能再告诉我
你是谁吗?”

她说:“是的,我叫莫妮克,

是卢旺达国家银行的副行长。”

如果你
在我们刚开始的时候告诉我

,在一代人的时间内,

一位年轻女性将继续帮助领导
她国家的金融部门,

我不确定我会相信你。


明白我回到了同一个地方

继续费利库拉已经开始
但在她有生之年无法完成的工作。

对我来说,要重新承诺

实现如此宏大的梦想,我可能
无法在我的心中完成它们。

那天晚上,我决定
给下一代写一封信,

因为有很多人把
他们的智慧和知识传给了我,

因为我越来越有紧迫感

,我可能无法完成
我来做的工作

,因为我想 把它传递

给每个想要
以只有他们能做的方式在这个世界上创造变化的

人。

那一代人在街头。

他们迫切
呼吁进行全面变革,

反对种族不公正、

宗教和种族迫害、

灾难性的气候变化

以及
使我们

在我有生之年比以往任何时候都更加分裂和分裂的残酷不平等。

但是我会对他们说什么呢?

我是一名建设者,所以我
从专注于技术修复开始,

但我们的问题太相互依存,

太纠缠不清。

我们需要的不仅仅是系统转变。

我们需要思想转变。

柏拉图写道,一个国家
培养它所崇敬的东西。

长期以来,我们将成功定义
为金钱、权力和名誉。

现在我们必须开始艰苦而
漫长的道德革命工作。

我的意思是把我们共同的人性

和地球的可持续性
放在我们系统的中心,

并优先考虑我们的集体,

而不是个人。

如果我们每个人
对世界的贡献比我们从中得到的多怎么办?

一切都会改变。

现在愤世嫉俗的人可能会说
这听起来太理想化了,

但愤世嫉俗的人不会创造未来。

虽然我已经学会了
肆无忌惮的乐观主义是愚蠢的,但

我与
那些坚持希望的人站在一起。

我知道改变是可能的。

我和我的团队共事

过的企业家和变革推动者影响了超过 3 亿
低收入人群

,有时甚至重塑了
整个行业以包括穷人。

但是,如果不将
道德革命建立

在实用性和意义的基础上,就无法真正谈论道德革命,

而这需要
一套全新的运作原则。

我只分享三个。

首先是道德想象。

即使在

为生活
与我们完全不同的人设计解决方案时,我们也经常只使用自己想象的镜头。

道德想象始于将
他人视为与我们平等的人,

既不高于也不低于我们,

既不理想化也不牺牲自己。

它需要沉浸
在他人的生活中

,了解阻碍他们前进的结构,

并诚实地了解
他们可能阻碍自己的地方。

这需要
从调查的地方深入倾听,

而不是确定性。

几年前,我在巴基斯坦的一个乡村
与一群女织工坐在一起

那天很热……

在阴凉处超过 120 度。

我想告诉女性
我的组织投资的一家公司,

该公司正在为
印度和东非的数百万人带来太阳能

,我看到
了这种光的变革力量,

让人们可以做
我们这么多人的事情 认为是理所当然的。

“我们有这个灯,”我说,

“大约七美元。

人们说它很神奇。

如果我们能说服公司
把这些产品带到巴基斯坦

,你们都会感兴趣吗?”

女人们瞪大了眼睛,

然后一个双手知道辛苦的大个子女人
看着我,

擦了擦脸上的汗水说:

“我们不要灯。

我们很热。

给我们带个风扇。”

“风扇,”我说。

“我们没有风扇。

我们有灯。

但是如果你有这个灯,
你的孩子可以在晚上学习,

你可以工作更多——”

她打断了我。

“我们工作够了。我们很热。

给我们带来一个风扇。”

那次直截了当的谈话
加深了我的道德想象。

我记得

那天晚上我躺在我的小旅馆的床上闷热,

非常感谢头顶风扇发出的咔哒声

我想,“当然。

。风扇。

尊严。”

当我现在访问我们的公司时

,这些公司已经为超过 1 亿人
提供了光和电

,那里真的很热

,如果有屋顶系统,

还有风扇。

但是
,重建和治愈我们的国家也需要道德想象力。

我的国家正在动荡不安,
因为它终于面对

了它不想看到的东西。

如果我们所有人都真正沉浸
在黑人的生活中,就不可能否认美国奴隶制的遗产。

当每个国家

的人民开始看到彼此

并明白正是在这项工作
中播下

了我们个人
和集体转变的种子时,每个国家都开始了疗愈的过程。

现在这需要

承认存在
于每个人身上的光与影,善与恶。

在我们的世界中,我们必须学会
与那些

我们认为是对手的人合作。

这就引出了第二个原则:

保持对立的价值观处于紧张状态。

今天,我们太多的领导人
站在一个角落或另一个角落

大喊大叫。

道德领袖拒绝
非此即彼的墙。

他们愿意承认对方相信的事实
,甚至部分

事实。

他们
通过为他人而不是自己服务做出有原则的决定来获得信任

为了在我的工作中取得成功,
需要

在市场的力量
以实现创新和繁荣

与市场的风险允许排斥

甚至剥削之间保持紧张关系。

那些将商业的唯一
目的视为利润

的人对这种压力感到不舒服,

那些对
商业完全不信任的人也不会。

但站在任何一边都
否定

了学习利用市场
而不被市场诱惑的创造性和生成潜力。

吃巧克力。

这是一个价值 1000 亿美元的产业,

依赖于大约 500 万小农家庭的劳动力,而这些
家庭

只获得
了 1000 亿美元中的一小部分。

事实上,其中 90% 的
人每天收入不到 2 美元。

但是有
一代新

企业家正试图改变这种状况。

他们首先了解
农民的生产成本。

他们同意一个价格,
使农民

能够以维持他们生活的方式实际赚取收入。

有时包括收入分成
和所有权模式,

建立信任社区。

现在这些公司是否和

那些
只关注股东价值的公司一样有利可图?

短期内可能不会。

但这些
企业家专注于解决问题。

他们厌倦了简单的口号,
比如“做好事,做好事”。

他们知道他们必须在
财务上可持续

,他们坚持
将穷人和弱势群体

纳入他们对成功的定义。

这让我想到了第三个原则:

伴奏。

这实际上是耶稣会的一个术语
,意思是与你并肩同行:

我会为你举起一面镜子,
帮助你看到自己的潜力,

也许比你自己看到的更多。

我会处理你的问题,
但我无法为你解决

——你必须学会这样做。

例如,在哈莱姆区,
有一个

名为 City Health Works 的组织

,它雇佣

没有医疗保健经验的当地居民,

培训他们与其他居民一起工作,

以便更好地控制
痛风、

高血压、糖尿病等慢性病。

我很
高兴见到了

一名卫生工作者 Destini Belton,

她向我解释了她的工作。

她说她会检查客户,

检查他们的生命体征,

带他们去杂货店购物,

长时间散步

,交谈。

她告诉我,“我让他们知道
有人支持他们。”

结果令人震惊。

患者更健康,
医院负担更轻。

至于德斯蒂尼,

她告诉我她的家人
,她更健康。

“而且,”她补充道,“我喜欢
为我的社区做出贡献。”

我们所有人都渴望被人看见

,数数。

变革

、道德革命的工作

是艰巨的。

但我们不会在轻松的时候改变。

我们在困难时期改变。

事实上,我已经开始将不适
视为进步的代表。

但还有一件事。

有一些事情我希望
我在多年前刚开始的

时候就知道。

无论多么艰难,

总有美在寻找。

我现在记得似乎很久以前的事,在肯尼亚内罗毕的马萨雷谷贫民窟,我

花了一整天的时间与一个又一个
女人交谈

当他们谈论失去孩子

、与暴力和饥饿作斗争时,我听了他们关于挣扎和生存的故事,

有时
觉得他们甚至无法生存。

就在我离开之前,

一场巨大的暴雨倾盆而下。

我坐在我的小车里
,车轮卡在泥里,

想着,“我永远不会离开这里”

,突然
我的窗户上轻轻敲了一下——

一个女人在招手
让我跟着她,

然后 我做到了。

冒着暴雨跳了出来,

我们沿着这条泥泞的小路,

穿过一扇摇摇晃晃的金属门,

进入了一个窝棚

里,一群女人
正在放荡不羁地跳舞。

我跳了进去,发现自己迷失
在节奏、色彩和微笑中

,突然我意识到:

这就是我们作为人类所做的事情。

当我们破碎,

当我们觉得我们失败
或绝望时,

我们跳舞。

我们唱歌。

我们祈祷。

美也存在于出现

、关注

和善良时,当我们觉得自己不是善良的时候

看看我们集体危机时刻艺术
、音乐和诗歌

的爆炸式增长吧。

在最黑暗的时期

,我们有
机会发现我们最深的美。

因此,让这一时刻成为我们

最深刻
和最集体智慧强化的新一代的紧迫感前进的时刻。

问问自己:

你能用今天的余生和你的余生做些什么


回馈世界而不是你得到的?

谢谢你。