The good news of the decade Hans Rosling

[Music]

[Music]

we are here today because United Nations

have defined goals for the progress of

countries they’re called Millennium

Development Goals and the reason I

really like these goals is that there

are eight of them and by specifying

eight different goals the United Nations

have said that there are so many things

needed to change in a country in order

to get a good life for people look here

you have to end poverty education gender

child and maternal health control

infections protect the environment and

get the good global links between

nations in every aspects from aid to

trade there’s a second reason I like

these Development Goals and that is

because each and every one is measured

take child mortality the aim here is to

reduce child mortality with two thirds

from 1990 to 2050 that’s a 4% reduction

per year and this with measuring that’s

what make the difference between

political talking like this and really

going for the important thing a better

life for people and what I’m so happy

about with this is that we have already

documented that there are many countries

in Asia in Middle East in Latin America

and East Europe that is reducing with

this rate and even my T Brazil is going

down with 5% per year and Turkey with 7%

per year so there’s good news but then I

hear people saying there is no progress

in Africa and there’s not even

statistics in Africa to know what is

happening I’ll prove them wrong on both

points come with me to the wonderful

world of statistic I bring you to the

webpage child mortality dot or you know

where you can bag deaths in children

below five years of age for all

countries it’s done by UN specialists

you know and I will take Kenya as an

example here you see the data don’t

panic now don’t panic you know I’ll help

you through this it looks you know nasty

like in in in college when you did like

statistics man but

first thing when you see dots like this

you have to ask yourself from where do

the date that come what is the origin of

the data is it so that in Kenya there

are doctors and other specialists who

write the death certificate at the death

of a child and it’s sent to the

Statistical Office no low-income

countries like Kenya still don’t have

that level of organization it exists but

it’s not complete because so many deaths

occur in the home with the family and

it’s not registered so what we rely on

is not incomplete system we have

interviews we have surveys and in this

is highly professional female

interviewers who sit down for one hour

with a woman and Oscar about birth

history how many children did you have

order you’re alive if they died at what

age and what year and then this is done

in a representative sample of thousands

of women in the country and put together

in what you used to be called a

demographic Health Survey report but

these surveys are costly so they can

only be done with three to five years

interval but they have good quality so

this is this is a limitation and all

these colored lines here are results

each color is one serving but that’s too

complicated for today so I’ll simplified

for you and I give you one average point

for each survey this was 1977 1988 1992

97 and 2002 and when when the expert in

the UN have got these service in place

in their database then they use advanced

mathematical formulas to produce a trend

line and trend line and the trend line

looks like this see here is the best fit

they can get of this point but watch out

they continue the line beyond the last

point out into nothing and they

estimated that 2008 Kenya had a child

mortality of 128 and I was sad because

we could see this this reversal in Kenya

with an increased child mortality in the

90s it was so tragic but in June I got

the mail in my inbox from demographic

Health Survey and it showed good

news from Kenya I was so happy this was

the estimate of the new survey then it

just took another three months for you

and to get it into their server and on

Friday we got the new trend line it was

down here

isn’t it nice isn’t it nice yeah I was

actually on Friday sitting in front of

my computer and I saw that the death

rate fall from 128 to 84 yes that

morning you know so we celebrated but

now when you have this trend line how do

we measure progress I’m going into some

details here because you n do it like

this they start 1992 they measure to

2009 they say 0.9% no progress that’s

unfair as a professor I think I have the

right to propose something differently I

would say at least do this ten years is

enough to follow the trend it’s to two

surveys and you can see what’s happening

now they have 2.4 percent had I been in

the Ministry of Health in Kenya I may

have joined these two points so what I’m

telling you is that we know the child

mortality we have a decent trend it

coming into some tricky things then when

we are measuring MDGs and the reason

here for Africa is especially important

because 90s was a bad decade not only in

Kenya but across Africa the HIV epidemic

peak that was resistant for the old

malaria drugs until we got the new drugs

we got late to the mosquito netting and

there were socio-economic problems which

are now being solved at the much better

scale so look at the average here this

is the average for all of sub-saharan

Africa and UN says it’s a reduction with

1.8 percent now this sounds a little

theoretical but it’s not so

theoretically you know these economists

they love money they want more and more

of it they want it to grow so they

calculate the percent annual growth rate

of economy we in public health we hate

child death so we want less and less and

less of child deaths so we we calculate

the percent reduction per year but it’s

sort of the same percentage if your

economy grow with 4% you ought to reduce

child mortality with 4% if it’s used

well and people are really involved and

can get the use of the resources in the

way they want so so is this fair now to

measure this over 19 years and

economists would never do that I have

just divided into two period in the 90s

only 1.2 percent only 1.2 percent

whereas now second gear is like Africa

had first gear

now they go into second gear but even

this is not a fair representation of

Africa because it’s an average it’s an

average speed of reduction in Africa and

look here when I take you into my bubble

graphs still here child F per 1000 on

that axis here we have year and I’m now

giving you a wider picture than the MDG

I start 50 years ago when Africa

celebrated independence in most

countries I give you Congo which was

high Ghana lower and Kenya even lower

and what has happened over the years

since there here we go you can see with

independence literacy improved you know

and vaccinations started smallpox was

eradicated hygiene was improved and

things got better but then in the

eighties watch out here Congo got into

civil war and they leveled off fear

Ghana got very help fast this was the

backlash in Kenya and go on a bypass but

then Kenyan gonna go down together

still the standstill in Congo that’s why

we are today you can see it doesn’t make

sense to make an average of this serie

improvement and this very fast

improvement time has come to stop

thinking about sub-saharan Africa as one

place that their countries are so

different and they married to be

recognized in the same way as we don’t

talk about Europe as one place I can

tell you that the economy in Greece and

Sweden are very different everyone knows

that and they are judged each country on

how they are doing you know so so let me

show the why the picture my country

Sweden 1800 we were up there what the

strange personality disorder we must

have counting the children so

meticulously in spite of a high child

death rate it’s very strange it’s sort

of embarrassing but we had that habit in

Sweden you know that we counted all the

child that’s even if we didn’t do

anything about it

and then you see these are famine years

this was bad years and people got fed up

with freedom my ancestors moved to the

United States you know and eventually

soon they started to get better and

better here and here we got better

education and we got health service and

child mortality came though we never had

a war Sweden was in peace all this time

but look the rate of lowering in Sweden

was not fast Sweden achieved a low child

mortality because we started early

we had primary school actually starting

1842 and then you get that wonderful

effect when we got female literacy one

generation later you have to realise

that the investments we do in progress

for long term investments is not about

just five years it’s long term

investments and and and Sweden never

reach Millennium Development Goal rate

3.1 percent when I calculate so we are

off track that was Sweden is but you

don’t talk about it so much you know we

want others to be better than we were

and indeed others have been better let

me show you Thailand see what a success

story in Thailand from the 1960s how

they went down here and reached almost

the same child mortality levels of

Sweden and I’ll give you another story

Egypt the most hidden glorious success

in public health he just was up here

1960 higher than Congo the Nile Delta

was a misery for children with diarrheal

disease you know and and malaria and a

lot of problem and then they got the

Aswan Dam they got electricity in the

homes the increased education and they

got primary health care and down they

went you know and they got safer water

they eradicated malaria and isn’t it a

success story Millennium Development

Goal rates for child mortality is fully

possible and the good thing is that

Ghana today is going with the same rate

as Egypt did as it fastest you know

Kenya is now speeding up here we have a

problem we have a severe problem in

countries which are at a standstill now

let me now bring you to a wider picture

a wider picture of child mortality I’m

going to show you the relation between

child mortality on this axis here this

here is child mortality and here I have

the family size the relation between

child mortality and family size one two

three four children per woman six seven

eight children per woman this is once

again 1960 50 years ago each bubble is a

country the color you can see the

continent the dark blue here is

sub-saharan Africa you know and the size

of the bubble is the population and

these are the so called developing

countries they had high or very high

child mortality and family size six to

eight and and and the ones over there

they were the so called Western

countries they had low child mortality

and small families what has happened

what I want you now is to see with your

own eyes the relation between falling

child mortality and decrease in family

size I just want not have any ruby has

to see that for yourself this is what

happened now I start the world here we

come down with their educational

smallpox better education you know

health service it got on there China

comes Indian to the Western box here you

know and here Brazil is in the west of

all India’s approach' the first African

countries coming into the Western ball

and we get a lot of new neighbors

welcome to a decent life come on we want

everyone down here this is the vision we

have isn’t it and look now the African

the first African countries here are

coming in there we are today there is no

such thing as a Western world and

developing world this is the this is the

report from UN which came out on Friday

it’s very good levels and Friends and

child mortality except this page this

page is very bad it’s the categorization

of countries it labels developing

countries I can read from the listed

developing countries Republic of Korea

South Korea now they get some some how

can they be developing countries they

have here Singapore that the lowest

child mortality in the world is

Singapore they bypass Sweden and five

years ago and they are label developing

country they have here guitar it’s a

richest country in the world with

aljazeera

how the heck could they be developing

this is crap the rest there is good the

rest is good we have to have a modern

concept which fit to the data you know

and we have to realize that we are all

going to live into this down to here

what is the importance now with the

relations here look even if we look in

Africa these are the African countries

you can clearly see the relation with

falling child mortality and decreasing

family size even within Africa it’s very

clear that this is what happens and a

very important piece of research came

out on Friday from the Institute of

Health metrics and evaluation in Seattle

showing that almost 50% of the fallen

child mortality can be attributed to

female education that is when we got get

girls in school we will get an impact 15

to 20 years later which is a secular

trend which is very strong that’s why we

must have that long-term perspective but

we must measure the impact over ten

years period it’s fully possible to get

child mortality down in all of these

countries and to get them down into the

corner why we all would like to live

together and of course lowering child

mortality is a matter or actor most

important from humanitarian aspects it’s

a decent life for children we are

talking about but it is also a strategic

investment in the future of all mankind

because it’s about the environment we

will not be able to manage the

environment and avoid the terrible

climate crisis if we don’t stabilize the

world population let’s be clear about

that

and the way to do that that is to get

child mortality down get access to

family planning and behind that a drive

of female education and that is fully

possible let’s do it thank you very much

you

[Music]

[音乐]

[音乐]

我们今天来到这里是因为联合国

已经为各国的进步

制定了目标,它们被称为千年发展目标,而我

真正喜欢这些目标的原因是其中

有八个,通过指定

八个不同的目标 联合国

曾表示,

一个国家需要改变很多事情才能

让人们过上好生活

从援助到贸易的各个方面,

我喜欢

这些发展目标还有第二个原因,那就是

因为每一个目标都是

衡量儿童死亡率的,这里的目标是

从 1990 年到 2050 年将儿童死亡率降低三分之二,即降低 4%

每年,这与衡量这

就是使

像这样的政治谈话和

真正追求更重要的事情更美好

生活之间的区别的原因 对于人们来说,我对此感到非常

高兴的是,我们已经

记录

了亚洲、中东、拉丁美洲

和东欧的许多国家正在以

这种速度下降,甚至我的巴西 T 也在

下降 5 % 每年,土耳其每年 7%

,所以这是个好消息,但后来我

听到人们说非洲没有进展

,甚至非洲没有

统计数据知道

发生了什么我会证明他们在这两点上都是错误的

跟我来 到美妙

的统计世界我带你到

网页儿童死亡率点,或者你知道

在哪里可以收集所有国家五岁以下儿童的死亡人数,

这是由你知道的联合国专家完成的

,我将以肯尼亚

为例在这里你 看到数据不要

惊慌现在不要惊慌你知道我会帮助

你完成这看起来你知道讨厌

就像在大学里当你喜欢

统计学

的时候但是当你看到这样的点时你首先

要问 你自己从哪里来 o

数据的来源是什么,以便在肯尼亚

有医生和其他专家

在儿童死亡时写死亡证明,

然后将其发送到

统计局 没有

像肯尼亚这样的低收入国家 没有

那个级别的组织它存在但

它不完整因为有很多死亡

发生在与家人在一起的家中并且

它没有登记所以我们依赖

的不是不完整的系统我们有

采访我们有调查并且这

是高度专业的 女性

采访者

与一位女性和奥斯卡坐下来讨论出生

史 你有多少个孩子

如果他们在什么年龄和哪一年去世,那么你还活着

,然后这是

在数千名女性的代表性样本

中完成的 这个国家,并

把你以前所谓的

人口健康调查报告放在一起,但

这些调查成本高昂,所以它们

只能间隔三到五年完成,

但它们有很好的质量 所以

这是一个限制,

这里所有这些彩色线条都是结果,

每种颜色都是一份,但这

对今天来说太复杂了,所以我会

为你简化,我给你一个平均分

,这是 1977 1988 1992

97 和 2002 年,当联合国专家

在他们的数据库中获得这些服务时,他们使用高级

数学公式来生成趋势

线和趋势线,趋势线

看起来像这样,看这里是

他们能得到的最佳拟合 这一点,但要注意,

他们继续超越最后

一点,一无所获,他们

估计 2008 年肯尼亚的儿童

死亡率为 128,我很伤心,因为

我们可以在肯尼亚看到这种逆转,

90 年代儿童死亡率增加 太悲惨了,但在 6 月,

我在收件箱中收到了人口

健康调查的邮件,它显示了

来自肯尼亚的好消息,我很高兴这

是新调查的估计,然后

又花了三个月 给你

,把它放到他们的服务器上,

周五我们得到了新的趋势线,它就

在这里

,不是很好,不是很好,是的,我

实际上在星期五坐在

我的电脑前,我看到了死亡

比率从 128 下降到 84 是的,

那天早上你知道,所以我们庆祝了,但是

现在当你有这条趋势线时,

我们如何衡量进展我将在

这里详细介绍一些细节,因为你这样

做他们从 1992 年开始他们衡量到

2009 年他们 说 0.9% 没有进展

作为教授是不公平的 我认为我

有权提出不同的建议 我

会说至少这样做十年就

足以跟上趋势 这是两次

调查 你可以看到现在发生

了什么 他们有 2.4% 如果我

在肯尼亚卫生部工作,我可能

会加入这两点,所以我要

告诉你的是,我们知道儿童

死亡率有一个不错的趋势,

我们衡量千年发展目标和

非洲的原因尤其是 特别重要,

因为 90 年代不仅在

肯尼亚,而且在整个非洲

都是糟糕的十年

正在以更好的规模解决,

所以看看这里的平均值,这

是整个撒哈拉以南非洲的平均值

,联合国说这是减少了

1.8% 现在这听起来有点

理论,但从

理论上讲,你知道

他们喜欢的这些经济学家 他们想要越来越多

的钱 他们希望它增长 所以他们

计算经济年增长率的百分比

我们在公共卫生领域 我们讨厌

儿童死亡 所以我们想要

的儿童死亡越来越少 所以我们计算

每人减少的百分比 年,但

如果您的

经济增长 4%,那么它的百分比是相同的,

如果使用

得当并且人们真正参与其中并且

可以使用 r,那么您应该将儿童死亡率降低 4%

以他们想要的方式获取资源,所以现在

用 19 年的时间来衡量

这一点是否公平,经济学家永远不会这样做

现在他们进入二档,但即使

这也不是非洲的公平代表,

因为它是一个平均值,它

是非洲的平均减速速度,

当我带你进入我的气泡图时,请看这里,

仍然在这里,在该轴上每 1000 个孩子 F

有一年,我现在

给你一个比 50 年前开始的千年发展目标更广泛的画面,

当时非洲

在大多数国家庆祝独立

我们去你可以看到

独立识字提高了你知道

并且疫苗接种开始天花被

根除卫生得到改善并且

事情变得更好但是在

八十年代注意这里刚果进入了

ci 一场恶战,他们平息了恐惧,

加纳很快得到了非常多的帮助,这

是肯尼亚的强烈反对,然后绕道而行,但

肯尼亚人会一起倒下,

仍然在刚果停滞不前,这就是

我们今天的原因,你可以看到它没有

意义 对这个意甲的改进进行平均

,这个非常快速的

改进时间已经到了停止

认为撒哈拉以南非洲是一个

他们的国家如此

不同的地方,他们结婚是

为了以同样的方式得到认可,就像我们不

谈论欧洲一样 作为一个地方,我可以

告诉你,希腊和瑞典的经济

是非常不同的,每个人都知道

这一点,每个国家都会根据

他们的表现来评判他们,所以让我

展示一下为什么我的国家

瑞典 1800 我们在那里 多么

奇怪的人格障碍

,尽管儿童死亡率很高,但我们必须如此细致地计算孩子

这很奇怪,这

有点尴尬,但我们在瑞典有这个习惯,

你知道我们都计算过 那个

孩子,即使我们什么都没做

,然后你会看到这是饥荒的年份,

这是糟糕的年份,人们厌倦

了自由,我的祖先搬到了

美国,你知道,最终

很快他们开始变得更好,

在这里和这里更好,我们得到了更好的

教育,我们得到了医疗服务,

尽管我们从来没有发生过战争,但儿童死亡率来

了。瑞典一直处于和平状态,

但看起来瑞典的下降速度

并不快

在 1842 年我们就开始上小学

,然后

当我们获得女性识字的

一代之后,你会得到那种奇妙的效果,你必须

意识到,我们正在进行

的长期投资

不仅仅是五年,而是长期

投资,而且 当我计算时,瑞典从未

达到 3.1% 的千年发展目标率,

所以我们

偏离了瑞典的轨道,但你

不会谈论太多你知道的 我们

希望其他人比我们更好

,实际上其他人已经更好让

我向您展示泰国,看看

泰国自 1960 年代以来的成功故事是

如何下降到与瑞典

几乎相同的儿童死亡率水平的

,我会给出 你是另一个故事

埃及 在公共卫生领域最隐秘的辉煌成就

他刚刚来到这里

1960 年比刚果高 尼罗河三角洲

对患有腹泻

病、疟疾和

很多问题的儿童来说是一个痛苦,然后他们得到了

阿斯旺大坝

家中通电 教育增加 他们

得到初级卫生保健 他们

走了 你知道他们得到了更安全的水

他们消灭了疟疾 这难道不是一个

成功的故事

是不是今天的加纳

和埃及的速度一样快你知道

肯尼亚现在在这里加速我们有一个

问题我们在国家有一个严重的问题

现在处于停顿状态

让我现在带您

了解更广泛的儿童死亡率的更广泛情况我

将向您展示

该轴上儿童死亡率之间的关系这里这

是儿童死亡率这里我

有家庭人数 在

儿童死亡率和家庭人数之间 一

二三四个每个女人的孩子 六个

七八个每个女人的孩子 这又是

1960 年 50 年前 每个泡泡都是一个

国家 你可以看到

大陆的颜色 这里的深蓝色是

撒哈拉以南非洲 你知道 泡沫的大小

是人口,

这些是所谓的发展中国家,

他们的儿童死亡率很高或非常高

,家庭人数为六到

八岁,

还有那些所谓的西方

国家,他们的儿童死亡率很低

和小家庭发生

了什么事我现在想让你亲眼看看

儿童死亡率下降和家庭

人数减少之间的关系我只想没有任何红宝石

亲眼看看这就是

现在发生的事情 我在这里开创了这个世界 我们

带着他们

的教育天花

降临

所有印度的做法“第一个非洲

国家加入西方舞会

,我们有很多新邻居

欢迎过上体面的生活来吧,我们希望

每个人都来这里,这就是我们的愿景,

不是吗,现在看看

非洲第一个 非洲国家

进来了,我们今天没有

西方世界和发展中国家这样的东西

这是联合国的报告,周五发布了

它的水平非常好,朋友和

儿童死亡率除了这个页面这个

页面 非常糟糕 这是

它标记为发展中国家的

国家的分类我可以从列出的

发展中国家中看到

韩国韩国现在他们得到了一些

他们怎么能成为发展中国家 他们

在这里拥有的国家新加坡,

世界上儿童死亡率最低的是

新加坡,他们绕过了瑞典,五

年前,他们被贴上了发展中国家的标签,

他们在这里拥有吉他,这

是世界上最富有的国家,有

半岛电视台

,他们怎么能开发

这个 是废话 其余的都很好

其余的都很好 我们必须有一个

适合您所知道的数据的现代概念

,我们必须意识到我们都

将生活在这

一切之中,现在关系的重要性是什么

即使我们在非洲看,

这些都是非洲国家

,即使在非洲,您也可以清楚地看到与

儿童死亡率下降和

家庭人数减少的关系很

明显,这是正在发生的事情,周五

一项非常重要的研究从

西雅图健康指标和评估研究所

显示,近 50% 的

儿童死亡率

下降可归因于女性教育 等

女孩上学,我们将在 15

到 20 年后产生影响,这是一个

非常强大的长期趋势,这就是为什么我们

必须有长远的眼光,但

我们必须衡量十年内的影响,

完全有可能获得

儿童死亡率 在所有这些

国家中,让他们陷入

困境,为什么我们都愿意生活

在一起,当然,降低儿童

死亡率是从人道主义方面最重要的问题或行动者,

这是

我们正在谈论的儿童过上体面的生活,

但它 也是

对全人类未来的一项战略投资,

因为它关乎环境,如果我们不能稳定世界人口,我们

将无法管理

环境并避免可怕的

气候危机,

让我们明确

这一点

以及如何去做 那就是

降低儿童死亡率 获得

计划生育 并且在这背后

推动女性教育,这是完全

可能的 让我们这样做 非常感谢你们

[Musi C]