Would you raise the bird that murdered your children Steve Rothstein

This is a little bee-eater’s nest.

But this is not a little bee-eater chick.

It’s a newly hatched honeyguide—
and it’s much more lethal.

When its mother placed it here, she
punctured all the other eggs in the nest.

However, one little bee-eater chick
survived the attack and is now hatching.

Although the honeyguide nestling
is still completely blind,

it instinctively stabs
the little bee-eater chick

with its sharp, hooked beak.

And over the following weeks,

the host parents devotedly care
for the hatchling

that murdered their offspring.

This is but one example
of brood parasitism,

an evolutionary strategy in which one
animal tricks another

into rearing its young.

It’s especially well-known among birds.

By depositing their eggs
into a stranger’s nest,

brood parasites are able to shift
the major costs of parenting onto others.

Brood parasite chicks usually
hatch early,

then monopolize their host parents’
attention.

Some stab their fellow nestlings to death,

while others shove the remaining
occupants out of the nest.

Meanwhile, others are less
harmful to their hosts.

Not all brood parasites kill
all of their host’s offspring outright.

Brown-headed Cowbirds
usually outcompete them

by begging for food louder,
more frequently, and with a wider mouth.

Among the most benign,

black-headed ducks lay their eggs
in other nests to be incubated.

However, a few hours after hatching,
they simply saunter off.

But in the most egregious cases
of brood parasitism,

why don’t host parents take a stand?

In fact, hosts will often drive adult
brood parasites away from their nests,

and many take their defenses further.

But whether a hosts can recognize
and reject parasitic eggs and nestlings

seems to depend on a few factors.

Eastern phoebes will accept

a Brown-headed Cowbird’s
speckled egg into their nest,

though theirs are pure white.

The gray catbird, on the other hand,

is an expert at rooting out
the very same parasites.

It memorizes what the first egg
in its nest looks like,

which is usually its own,
and tosses any aberrations.

This retaliatory adaptation can fuel
an evolutionary arms race

where brood parasites evolve eggs
that closely mimic their host’s.

Interestingly, birds that do reject
parasitic eggs

are usually clueless when it comes
to parasitic chicks.

Reed warblers are good
at ejecting poorly matching cuckoo eggs.

But if one hatches in their nest,

they’ll care for it even after
it’s grown six times their size.

Though chick rejection is
a rarer phenomenon,

there are some noteworthy examples.

While incubating its eggs, the Australian
superb fairy-wren sings to them,

imparting a unique note that its chicks
use as a kind of password.

When a cuckoo is in the wren’s nest, it
hatches first and pushes the others out.

But, perhaps because it hatched sooner,

the cuckoo chick wasn’t able
to learn the password,

and so it doesn’t croon
the right begging call.

At this point, the adults usually abandon
their nest and start another.

Altogether, host species show
a remarkable variety of responses.

This seems to partially be
a result of how long

brood parasitism has been
in their environment,

and thus how much time they’ve had
to evolve suitable adaptations.

In fact, studies have shown that those
hosts that reject parasitic eggs

less frequently can visually distinguish
between their eggs and a brood parasite’s.

They simply lack a response
to the visual information.

This is probably because,
before brood parasitism appeared,

responding would have likely
had no adaptive value.

And even when hosts do
recognise a parasite,

getting rid of it may not
be the best option.

The host, especially if it’s small,
might not be able to kill the parasite—

or could risk breaking
its own eggs in the process.

Unless the brood parasite
kills all of the host’s young,

it may be best to simply
foster the imposter.

Brood parasitism tends to evoke
horror and disdain.

But why should it be thought of as any
more objectionable

than predator-prey relationships?

And is it ever productive to impose
human morals onto other animals?

Or does it end up saying more about us
than it does them?

Whichever way you swing it,

brood parasitism is yet another example of
the fascinating turns evolution has taken.

这是一个小蜂巢。

但这不是一只食蜂鸟。

这是一种新孵化的蜜鳜——
而且它的杀伤力要大得多。

当它的母亲把它放在这里时,她
刺破了巢中的所有其他鸡蛋。

然而,一只食蜂鸟
在袭击中幸存下来,现在正在孵化。

虽然蜜导雏鸟
仍然完全失明,

但它本能地用锋利的钩状喙刺伤
了这只食蜂

鸟。

在接下来的几周里

,寄宿父母全心全意地照顾

杀死他们后代的幼体。

这只是
育雏寄生的一个例子,这是

一种进化策略,一种
动物欺骗另一种动物

来抚养它的幼崽。

它在鸟类中尤其出名。

通过将它们的卵
放入陌生人的巢穴中,

寄生虫能够将
养育子女的主要成本转移到其他人身上。

寄生的寄生虫小鸡通常很
早就孵化,

然后垄断了寄主父母的
注意力。

有些人刺死了他们的同胞雏鸟,

而另一些则将其余的
居住者赶出巢穴。

同时,其他人
对宿主的危害较小。

并非所有的寄生寄生虫
都会彻底杀死宿主的所有后代。

棕头牛鸟
通常

通过更大声、
更频繁地乞求食物和更宽的嘴来与它们竞争。

在最温和的

鸭子中,黑头鸭将卵产
在其他巢穴中进行孵化。

然而,孵化后几个小时,
它们只是闲逛。

但在最严重
的育雏寄生案例中,

为什么寄宿父母不表态呢?

事实上,寄主通常会将成年的
寄生虫驱离它们的巢穴,

并且许多人会进一步防御。

但宿主能否识别
和拒绝寄生卵和雏鸟

似乎取决于几个因素。

东部

菲比鸟会接受棕色头牛鸟的
斑点蛋进入它们的巢穴,

尽管它们的蛋是纯白色的。

另一方面,灰猫鸟是

根除相同寄生虫的专家。

它会记住巢中第一个蛋的
样子,

通常是它自己的蛋,
并抛出任何异常。

这种报复性的适应可能会
引发一场进化军备竞赛

,在这种竞赛中,寄生虫会进化
出与宿主非常相似的卵。

有趣的是,拒绝
寄生卵

的鸟类通常
对寄生小鸡毫无头绪。

芦苇莺
擅长吐出不匹配的杜鹃蛋。

但是,如果一个人在他们的巢穴中孵化,

即使
它长大了六倍,他们也会照顾它。

虽然拒绝雏鸡是
一种罕见的现象,

但也有一些值得注意的例子。

在孵化它的蛋时,澳大利亚
一流的仙女鹪鹩向它们唱歌,

传授一种独特的音符,它的小鸡将其
用作一种密码。

当杜鹃在鹪鹩巢中时,它
首先孵化并将其他人推出。

但是,也许是因为它孵化得更早

,杜鹃小鸡
无法知道密码

,所以它不会
发出正确的乞求电话。

在这一点上,成年人通常会放弃
他们的巢穴并开始另一个巢穴。

总而言之,宿主物种表现
出不同寻常的反应。

这似乎部分
是由于

育雏寄生
在它们的环境中已有

多长时间,因此它们必须有多少时间
进化出合适的适应。

事实上,研究表明,那些不经常
拒绝寄生卵的宿主

可以在视觉上
区分它们的卵和寄生虫的卵。

他们只是缺乏
对视觉信息的反应。

这可能是因为
在育雏寄生出现之前,

反应可能
没有适应性价值。

即使宿主确实
识别出寄生虫,

摆脱它也可能不是
最好的选择。

宿主,特别是如果它很小,
可能无法杀死寄生虫——

或者
在这个过程中可能会破坏自己的卵。

除非幼虫
杀死所有寄主的幼崽,

否则最好简单地
培养冒名顶替者。

育雏寄生往往会引起
恐惧和蔑视。

但是为什么它应该被认为

比捕食者-猎物关系更令人反感呢?


人类道德强加于其他动物是否有成效?

或者它最终对我们的评价
比对他们的评价更多?

无论您采用哪种方式,

育雏寄生都是
进化所经历的迷人转变的又一个例子。