What makes for a strong town

[Music]

[Music]

make no little plans

i’m an engineer and a planner it’s one

of these statements that

was given to us very early in our

education process it’s one of these

inspiring things that we put in our

baby’s nursery put in internet memes

that we pass around

we we put it in granite on the walls

make

no little plans the idea is that we

should be bold we should think big we

should have grand visions

for what tomorrow can bring it’s a very

inspiring way to look at the world

the phrase was uttered by daniel burnham

who put together the chicago plan

he did this uh speech in 1910

and i think it’s important to step back

and understand the world

that daniel burnham spoke this statement

in it was a world where

uh as a great planner he could look

around and see

these amazing cities these amazing

things that we had done as humans

in different continents different

latitudes different cultures these

prime achievements that we had created

by thinking big

and he has inspired

tons of people that have come after him

to dream big

in the decades after he uttered these

words we certainly did dream big

and we acted big we did a lot of big big

things in this country

if we look at the last 100 years of

development in north america

i think the one adjective you would use

to describe it is big

everything we have built has been big

and bold

we can look at a city like fresno

california which is very typical of the

north american development pattern

we see before uh the great depression

a certain incremental style of growth

that then after world war ii began to

expand

in a big big way all of our cities have

grown

in this horizontal pattern in a very

aggressive manner

we understand this as growth we

understand this as creating a certain

amount of prosperity

we also need to step back and understand

the liability involved in this

when you take a city and you spread it

out across a broad area

you create a lot of obligations

i was involved in a study in the city of

lafayette louisiana

and we noted that after world war ii

since then they had grown by

3.5 times by 350 percent

in that same period of time when we

examined their water system their water

system had grown by 10 times

and their their their hydrants a little

part of their water system

those have grown by 21 times so we asked

ourselves with all this growth

how much wealthier are the people of

lafayette louisiana

what we found is that the median

household income has only grown by 1.6

times

we’ve added enormous liabilities to our

cities

when we look around today cities

everywhere are struggling under the

burden

of maintaining just basic infrastructure

we’re told we don’t have enough money

millions of dollars per city my little

town

after world war ii has added no

population but has grown by 10 times

who’s paying for all that stuff this is

the city of lafayette a little

map we put together we did a what a

sense is a profit and loss

map for the city everywhere you see a

blue

property what you’ve seen is a property

that pays more taxes

on an annual basis than they require an

ongoing services

and every time you see a property that’s

in red it’s the exact opposite

these are properties that over the long

term annually require more and more

money to provide basic services to

than they create in tax revenue that red

stuff

out on the edge looks like the things

we’ve become used to

the malls the strip malls the big box

stores the windy cul-de-sacs with the

three-car garage with the attached house

that other stuff looks uh very like run

down to us

uh it looks very different it looks like

the stuff that we’ve walked away from

these are the poorer neighborhoods these

are the neighborhoods where the poor

people live yet

profitable generating excess revenue for

the city year after year after year

how can this be here’s two identical

properties when we look at them we see

they’re the same size the same area

this is very typical of the development

pattern shift that we’ve seen

in this country this property on the

left

is the traditional development pattern

kind of the first

infant phase of it that first increment

of growth that cities would have

experienced

two blocks over used to look just like

this the city labeled it blight had it

torn down

and now we have the new taco

drive-through this meets all the zoning

codes all the development standards

city got rid of blight everybody was

really happy when nobody bothered to

look at that property on the left

had a total value of 1.1 million dollars

those property on the right

the one that is shiny and new that we

were trying so hard to get is only worth

six hundred thousand

that old blighted block not only pays

way more taxes

but employs more people has more local

business owners they use more local

services

it’s part of our economic ecosystem

often i’m asked how is this possible

this doesn’t seem to jive with the way

we build our places

and there’s a lot of complex reasons why

this works out this way we see it over

and over and over again

city after city that we model i want to

point out just one quick thing for you

think like a poor person for a second

and imagine that you are coming together

with a bunch of your neighbors

to build a street and you’re going to

build homes along the street how would

you do this

you’re poor what you would do is you

would make houses

that were thin and deep because then you

would all share

with a cost there’d be more of you to

share with this cost of the street

now imagine that you consider yourself

wealthy did you have to worry about any

of these long-term expenses

that all this was not a big deal what

would you do you would take that house

and you would turn it

and you would make it wide and shallow

you would make it like a prince mansion

right you would

have a very different approach this is a

fundamental shift we have made

because we’ve discounted these long-term

liabilities as we’ve grown

this is in sharp contrast to the way

cities were traditionally built we can

go around the world

different continents different cultures

different latitudes and we see a very

familiar pattern

we see cities start with little pop-up

shacks

very first increment of investment so

people with some hopes and some dreams

about the future

over time as people come together and

the land becomes more valuable

these will redevelop they’ll become

these structures that maybe two and

three story wood like this in my

hometown

this is the same street by the way just

30 years later

go another 40 years in the future and

these wood structures will be turned

into buildings of brick and granite

incremental development over time the

slow

grinding of time gradually shifting

and replacing and making places stronger

more productive more valuable

incidentally this is what this street

looks like today

it’s it’s a denuded space

of parking lots and half occupied

buildings

we have denuded our cities

we have denied them wealth and we have

added to them

enormous liabilities this is a pattern

that cannot continue

this is a pattern that we need to change

we need to take some conscious steps

to do things differently one of the

first things we need to do is we need to

focus

on maintaining what we have it’s

astounding to me how

i can go to city after city after city

who will have these big intricate

reports that say we have

tens of millions of dollars of unfunded

maintenance liabilities for our road

system

yet they go out and build more roads

we have to become obsessive about

maintaining and taking care of what we

have

we need to shift our focus instead of

looking at what the new developer coming

to town can bring us

instead of looking at the federal or

state grant program that we can get

funded

we need to look at the way our people

are using the city

focus on their needs they point to us by

their actions

the highest returning investments we can

make

we need to make our places worthy of

care

i’m an engineer this is something they

don’t teach you in engineering school

but it’s the little frivolity of life

that adds beauty to a place

that makes it worth caring about when

people don’t care about

their places they don’t take care of

them if we want our cities to be

successful

we need to show them love and we need to

start making better use of what we’ve

already built

we’ve built this enormous amount of

infrastructure we need to start using it

we need to start thickening up

our cities this is one little example

that i’m fond of

uh between these two big structures

there’s this little attorney’s office

that’s built in here it’s a very tiny

little place

uh and we laugh at it right it is funny

it is

funny looking but understand that

pound for pound the financial

productivity of this place

is six times this city’s walmart

it is these kind of investments in these

lost spaces that are going to transform

not just the uses of our cities but

their financial productivity

at strong towns we’ve come up with a

process for identifying what the best

public investments that we can make are

it’s very simple

the first thing we do is we go out and

we humbly observe

where people in our community are

struggling we then ask the question

what is the next smallest thing we can

do right now to address this struggle

we do that thing we do it immediately

and then we repeat that process over and

over

this is an incremental iterative

approach to

not only thickening up our places but to

responding to the needs of the people

in our communities i was in lawton

oklahoma

which is a city i’m very fond of

but when i was there lawton had a couple

years earlier done

a a a federally funded multi-million

dollar

streetscape project the idea was to go

in

and kind of you know make no little

plans uh reimagine what the street could

be like

they put in the decorative lights the

decorative sidewalks

they did all this stuff and nothing

happened

it’s not a bad vision it’s just not the

right project for where they are

it was not the right project for them

let me give you another

uh place this is memphis tennessee a

little street called broad avenue

broad avenue is abandoned streetcar line

and some neighbors went out

and said you know what these stores are

empty we would like to see them

reactivated

and they took paint and they took their

own efforts and sweat

and cleaned up these stores and cleaned

up this street and made it look a little

bit nicer

and the results have been fantastic

millions of dollars of new property

value investment

from a total public investment of zero

these

are the types of investments the

incremental iterative nature

of putting people first in our places

that will make our cities wealthy

so make no little plans i i’m not ready

to walk away from this

i think we should have bold visions for

the future

i think we should have an expansive view

of what we can together

accomplish but i think we have to go

back and understand that in daniel

burnham’s day you could there was a

limit to how far you could go

at one time you were forced to work

iteratively

and i think we need to bring that

discipline back we need to make no

large leaps we need to force ourselves

to work

incrementally to build prosperity in our

places

now i haven’t yet pushed back on this

people will say chuck

uh the problems we’re facing are so huge

they’re so enormous

how can we possibly work incrementally

we’re dealing with climate change

we’re dealing with uh wealth inequality

we’re dealing with social justice issues

how can we possibly work incrementally

i find that approach intellectually lazy

lacking

in imagination and not just a little bit

self-serving

when we look at cities and we look at

the way they have developed over time

we have to acknowledge that a city that

looks like this

in 1878 can grow to look like this

just a short period of time later and

can then evolve to this

and ultimately become this place that

we’re all familiar with

when we look at all the great things

that we have done in our cities all the

things we’re most proud of

what we understand is that they’re the

culmination

of decades and decades generations and

generations of hard work

of incremental iterative steps yes

there’s bold vision there

but we did not build the eiffel tower so

we could have paris

we did not build the coliseum so we

could get rome those things

were the celebration of many many many

generations of hard work and success

if we can humble ourselves to see

the value in an iterative approach

we can not only make great investments

in our communities make them financially

strong and resilient but we can do it

while improving people’s lives and

that’s

what we should be all about thank you so

much

[音乐]

[音乐]

制定不小的计划

我是一名工程师和规划师 这

是在我们的

教育过程中很早就给我们的这些陈述之一 这

是我们放在婴儿托儿所的这些鼓舞人心的东西之一

放在互联网上

我们传递的模因

我们把它放在墙上的花岗岩上

制定

不小的计划 想法是我们

应该大胆 我们应该大胆思考 我们

应该

对明天会带来什么有宏伟的愿景 这是一种非常

鼓舞人心的看待世界的方式

这句话是由丹尼尔伯纳姆说出的,

他把芝加哥计划放在一起,

他在 1910 年发表了这个呃演讲

,我认为退后一步

了解丹尼尔伯纳姆发表这个声明的世界很重要,

在这个世界里,

呃,作为一个伟大的规划师,他 可以环顾

四周,看到

这些令人惊叹的城市这些令人惊叹

的事情我们作为人类

在不同的大陆不同的

纬度不同的文化

这些我们

通过思考远大

而创造的主要成就他h

在他说出这些话后的几十年里,许多

追随他的人都梦想

成真

北美的发展

我想你会用一个形容词

来形容它是大

我们建造的一切都是大

而大胆的

我们可以看看像

加利福尼亚州弗雷斯诺这样的城市,这是我们之前看到的非常典型的

北美发展模式

大萧条

一种渐进式的增长方式

,然后在二战后开始

大规模扩张 我们所有的城市都

以非常激进的方式以这种横向模式

发展 我们将其理解为增长 我们将其

理解为创造

一定数量 为了繁荣,

我们还需要退后一步,了解

当您占领一个城市并将

其分散到广阔的区域时所涉及的责任,

您创造了很多

义务 参与在路易斯安那州拉斐特市进行的一项研究中

,我们注意到,自二战

以来

,在我们

检查他们的水系统的同一时期,他们的水系统增长了 3.5 倍,增长了 350%,他们的水

系统增长了 10 倍,

并且 他们他们的消防栓

是他们供水系统的一小部分,

增长了 21 倍,所以我们问

自己,随着所有这些增长

路易斯安那州拉斐特人的财富有

多少我们发现

家庭收入中位数仅增长了 1.6

倍 “当我们环顾四周时,给我们的城市增加了巨大

的负担,如今世界各地的城市都在

为维护基本基础设施的负担而苦苦挣扎,

我们被告知我们没有足够的钱

,我的

小镇

在二战后增加了数百万美元 没有

人口,但增长了 10 倍

谁在为所有这些东西买单 这

是拉斐特市 一张小

地图 我们放在一起 我们做了什么

感觉是一种利润和

随处可见的城市损失地图

蓝色

物业 你所看到的物业

每年缴纳的

税款超过了持续服务所需的税款

,每次你看到红色物业时,

这些物业正好相反 从长远

来看,每年需要越来越多的

钱来提供基本服务,而

不是他们创造的税收

边缘上的红色东西看起来就像

我们已经习惯

的东西 商场 脱衣舞厅 大盒子

存储风 带

三车位车库的死胡同 有附属

房子 其他东西看起来 呃

很像我们

呃 它看起来很不一样 它看起来像

我们离开的东西

这些是较贫穷的社区 这些

是 穷人居住的社区

年复一年地为城市创造超额收入,

怎么会是这两个相同的

房产,当我们看着它们时,我们发现

它们的大小相同 e 同一个地区

这是我们在这个国家看到的非常典型的发展

模式转变

左边的这个属性

是传统的发展模式

是它的第一个婴儿阶段

城市将经历两次增长的第一次增量

过去的街区看起来就像

这样 被标记为枯萎病的城市被拆除了

,现在我们有了新的 taco

drive-through 这符合所有的分区

代码 所有的发展标准

城市摆脱了枯萎病

当没有人打扰时,每个人都很开心

看左边那栋房子

总价值 110 万美元

右边那栋我们费

了很大力气才弄到的崭新的房子只值

60 万

那个破旧的房子不仅

要花更多的钱 税收,

但雇用更多人 拥有更多本地

企业主 他们使用更多本地

服务

这是我们经济生态系统的一部分

经常有人问我这怎么可能

这似乎不太可能 o 与我们建造场所的方式不谋而合

,有很多复杂的原因导致

这种情况发生,我们一遍又一遍地看到它在

我们建模的一个城市又一个城市我想

指出一件快速的事情,让你

觉得像 一个穷人

,想象一下你

和一群邻居聚

在一起建一条街道,你要在

这条街上建房子 你会

怎么做

你很穷 你会怎么做

建造又薄又深的房子,因为那时你们

将分担成本 会有更多人

分担街道的成本

现在想象你认为自己很

富有 你是否需要担心

这些长期 费用

这一切都不是什么大问题 你

会怎么做 你会拿下那栋房子

,你会转动它

,你会让它变得又宽又浅

你会让它像王子的豪宅一样

会有一个非常不同的方法 这是一个

我们的根本转变

我们之所以这样做,是因为

随着我们的发展,我们已经将这些长期负债打折了

这与

传统的城市建造方式形成鲜明对比 我们

可以环游世界

不同的大陆 不同的文化

不同的纬度,我们看到了一个非常

熟悉的模式

城市从小型弹出式棚屋开始,

第一次增加投资,所以

随着时间的推移,人们对未来有

一些希望和一些

梦想 故乡这样的故事木头

这是同一条街

30

年后 再过40年

这些木结构将

变成砖和花岗岩的建筑

随着时间的推移逐渐发展 时间的

缓慢

研磨 逐渐移动

并且替换和使地方变得

更强大更有生产力更有价值

顺便说一句这就是这条街

今天

的样子它是我 这是一个空空如也

的停车场和一半占用的

建筑物

我们已经剥夺了我们的城市

我们剥夺了他们的财富,我们

给他们增加了

巨大的负债 这是一种

无法继续

的模式 这是一种我们需要改变的模式

我们需要采取一些措施 有意识

地以不同的方式

做事 我们需要做的第一件事就是

专注

于维护我们拥有的东西 这

让我感到震惊 我如何

能够去一个又一个城市 一个城市又一个城市

谁会有这些大而复杂的

报告说我们有

我们的道路系统有数千万美元的无资金维护负债,

但他们出去建造更多的道路

到城镇可以带给我们,

而不是查看我们可以获得资助的联邦或

州拨款计划

我们需要看看我们的

人民使用城市的方式

关注他们的 他们需要他们通过

他们的行为指出我们

我们可以做出的最高回报投资

我们需要让我们的地方

值得照顾 美丽到一个

值得关心的地方 当

人们不关心

他们的地方 他们不关心

他们 如果我们希望我们的城市

成功

我们需要向他们表达爱 我们需要

开始更好地利用 我们

已经建造的东西

我们已经建造了如此庞大的

基础设施 我们需要开始使用它

我们需要开始加强

我们的城市 这是我喜欢的一个小例子

呃 在这两个大结构之间

有这个小律师

建在这里的办公室 这是一个很小的

地方

呃 我们会笑它是对的 它很有趣

看起来很

有趣 但要明白

这个地方的财务生产力

是这个城市沃尔玛的六倍

正是这些对这些

失去的空间的投资

不仅将改变我们城市的用途,而且改变

它们

在强大城镇的金融生产力,我们提出了一个

流程来

确定我们可以做出的最佳公共投资是

什么 非常简单

,我们做的第一件事就是走出去

,谦虚地观察

我们社区中的人们在哪里

挣扎,然后问这个问题

,我们现在可以做的下一件最小的事情是什么,

以解决这场斗争,

我们做那件事,我们立即做

然后我们一遍又一遍地重复这个过程,

这是一种渐进的迭代

方法,

不仅可以丰富我们的地方,还可以

响应

我们社区人民的需求我在俄克拉荷马州的劳顿

,这是一个我非常喜欢

但 当我在那里的时候,劳顿几年前完成了一个

由联邦政府资助的价值数百万

美元的

街景项目,当时的想法是进去

,你知道的,你知道做不小的

计划,呃,重新想象一下 在街上

可能就像

他们装上装饰灯

装饰人行道

他们做了所有这些事情并没有

发生任何事情

这不是一个糟糕的愿景 它只是不

适合他们所在的

项目 它不适合他们的项目

让我给你 另一个

呃地方 这是田纳西州孟菲斯 一条

小街叫宽大道

和汗水

,清理这些商店,

清理这条街,让它看起来

更好一点

,结果是惊人的

数百万美元的新物业

价值投资

,公共投资总额为零,

这些

是增量迭代的投资类型

在我们的地方以人为本的本质,

这将使我们的城市变得富有,

所以不要制定任何小计划,我还没准备

好离开

我认为我们应该对

未来有大胆的

设想 你可以去

一次你被迫迭代地工作

,我认为我们需要恢复这种

纪律我们需要不做

大的飞跃我们需要强迫自己

逐步工作

以在我们的地方建立繁荣

现在我还没有推动 回过头来,

人们会说,

呃,我们面临的问题是如此巨大

,如此巨大

,我们如何才能逐步开展工作?

我们正在应对气候变化,

我们正在应对财富不平等,

我们正在应对社会正义 问题

我们如何才能渐进式地工作

我发现这种方法在智力上很懒惰,

缺乏想象力,而不仅仅是一点点

自私

当我们看着城市时,我们

看着它们随着时间的推移而发展的方式,

我们 不得不承认,一个

1878 年看起来像这样的城市可以

在很短的一段时间后

发展成这样,然后可以演变成这样

,最终成为我们在看到所有伟大的

事物时都熟悉的地方

我们在城市所做的所有

事情我们最引以为豪的

事情是我们所理解的是,它们是

几十年、几十年几代人以及

几代人

通过渐进式迭代步骤辛勤工作的结晶是的,

那里有大胆的愿景,

但我们没有 建造埃菲尔铁塔,这样

我们就可以拥有巴黎

我们没有建造体育馆,所以我们

可以得到罗马 如果我们能够谦虚地看到迭代方法中的价值,那么这些东西

是对许多

代人的辛勤工作和成功的庆祝,

我们可以 不仅

在我们的社区进行大量投资,使他们在财务上变得

强大和有弹性,而且我们可以

在改善人们生活的同时做到这一点,

就是我们应该做的,非常感谢