How an old loop of railroads is changing the face of a city Ryan Gravel

This picture

is from my metro card

when I spent a year abroad in Paris
in college in the mid-’90s.

My friend says I look
like a French anarchist –

(Laughter)

But this is still what I see

when I look in the mirror in the morning.

Within a month of living in Paris,
I’d lost 15 pounds

and I was in the best shape of my life

because I was eating fresh food

and I was walking wherever I went.

Having grown up in suburban Atlanta,

a region built largely
by highways and automobiles

and with a reputation
as a poster child for sprawl,

Paris fundamentally changed
the way I understood

the construction of the world around me,

and I got obsessed with the role
of infrastructure –

that it’s not just the way to move people
from point A to point B,

it’s not just the way to convey water
or sewage or energy,

but it’s the foundation for our economy.

It’s the foundation for our social life
and for our culture,

and it really matters
to the way that we live.

When I came home,
I was instantly frustrated,

stuck in traffic as I crossed
the top end of our perimeter highway.

Not only was I not moving a muscle,

I had no social interaction

with the hundreds of thousands of people
that were hurtling past me,

like me, with their eyes faced forward
and their music blaring.

I wondered if this was
an inevitable outcome,

or could we do something about it.

Was it possible to transform
this condition in Atlanta

into the kind of place
that I wanted to live in?

I went back to grad school
in architecture and city planning,

developed this interest in infrastructure,

and in 1999 came up with an idea

for my thesis project:

the adaptation of an obsolete loop
of old railroad circling downtown

as a new infrastructure
for urban revitalization.

It was just an idea.

I never thought
we would actually build it.

But I went to work
at an architecture firm,

and eventually talked
to my coworkers about it,

and they loved the idea.

And as we started talking
to more people about it,

more people wanted to hear about it.

In the summer of 2001,

we connected with Cathy Woolard,

who was soon elected
city council president.

And we built a citywide vision
around this idea:

the Atlanta BeltLine, a 22-mile loop

of transit and trails and transformation.

I was doing two and three meetings a week
for two and a half years,

and so was Cathy and her staff
and a handful of volunteers.

Together, we built this amazing movement
of people and ideas.

It included community advocates
who were used to fighting against things,

but found the Atlanta BeltLine
as something that they could fight for;

developers who saw the opportunity

to take advantage of a lot
of new growth in the city;

and dozens of nonprofit partners
who saw their mission

at least partly accomplished
by the shared vision.

Now, usually these groups of people
aren’t at the same table

wanting the same outcome.

But there we were,
and it was kind of weird,

but it was really, really powerful.

The people of Atlanta
fell in love with a vision

that was better than what they saw
through their car windshields,

and the people of Atlanta made it happen,

and I guarantee you we would not
be building it otherwise.

From the beginning,
our coalition was diverse.

People of all stripes
were part of our story.

People on the lower end
of the economic spectrum loved it, too.

They were just afraid
they weren’t going to be able to be there

when it got built,
that they’d be priced out.

And we’ve all heard
that kind of story before, right?

But we promised that
the Atlanta BeltLine would be different,

and people took ownership of the idea,

and they made it better
than anything we ever imagined

in the beginning,

including significant
subsidies for housing,

new parks, art, an arboretum –
a list that continues to grow.

And we put in place

the organizations and agencies
that were required to make it happen.

And importantly, it is.

Now we’re in the early stages
of implementation, and it’s working.

The first mainline section
of trail was opened in 2012,

and it’s already generated
over three billion dollars

of private-sector investment.

But it’s not only changing
the physical form of the city,

it’s changing the way
we think about the city,

and what our expectations are
for living there.

About a month ago,

I had to take my kids with me
to the grocery store

and they were complaining about it,

because they didn’t want
to get in the car.

They were saying, “Dad, if we have to go,

can we at least ride our bikes?”

And I said, “Of course we can.

That’s what people in Atlanta do.

We ride our bikes to the grocery store.”

(Laughter)

(Applause)

Thank you, yeah.

Now, they don’t know
how ridiculous that is,

but I do.

And I also understand
that their expectations for Atlanta

are really powerful.

This kind of transformation
is exactly like sprawl

in the last century,

the movement where our investment
in highways and automobiles

fundamentally changed American life.

That wasn’t some grand conspiracy.

There were conspiracies
within it, of course.

But it was a cultural momentum.

It was millions of people
making millions of decisions

over an extended period of time,

that fundamentally changed
not only the way that we build cities,

but it changed our expectations

for our lives.

These changes were the foundations
for urban sprawl.

We didn’t call it sprawl at that time.

We called it the future.

And it was.

And we got all the highways
and strip malls and cul-de-sacs we wanted.

It was a radical transformation,

but it was built by a cultural momentum.

So it’s important to not separate

the physical construction
of the places we live

from other things that
are happening at that time.

At that time,

in the second half of the last century,

science was curing disease

and lifting us to the moon,

and the sexual revolution
was breaking down barriers,

and the Civil Rights Movement
began its march

toward the fulfillment
of our nation’s promise.

Television, entertainment, food, travel,
business – everything was changing,

and both the public
and private sectors were colluding

to give us the lives we wanted.

The Federal Highway Administration,

for example, didn’t exist
before there were highways.

Think about it.

(Laughter)

Of course, today it’s important
to understand and acknowledge

that those benefits accrued
to some groups of people

and not to others.

It was not an equitable cultural momentum.

But when we look today
in wonder and disgust, maybe,

at the metropolis sprawl before us,

we wonder if we’re stuck.

Are we stuck with the legacy
of that inequity?

Are we stuck with this dystopian
traffic hellscape?

Are we stuck with rampant
urban displacement,

with environmental degradation?

Are we stuck with social isolation

or political polarization?

Are these the inevitable
and permanent outcomes?

Or are they the result
of our collective cultural decisions

that we’ve made for ourselves?

And if they are,

can’t we change them?

What I have learned
from our experience in Atlanta

is not an anomaly.

Similar stories
are playing out everywhere,

where people are reclaiming
not only old railroads,

but also degraded urban waterways
and obsolete roadways,

reinventing all of the infrastructure

in their lives.

Whether here in New York

or in Houston

or Miami,

Detroit, Philadelphia,

Seoul, Hong Kong, Singapore,

Toronto and Paris,

cities big and small all over the world
are reclaiming and reinventing

this infrastructure for themselves,

including the mother
of all catalyst infrastructure projects,

the Los Angeles River,

the revitalization effort
for which similarly started

as a grassroots movement,

has developed into a cultural momentum,

and is now in the early stages
of being transformed

into some kind of life-affirming
infrastructure again,

this one with trails and parks
and fishing and boating

and community revitalization,

and of course, water quality
and flood control.

It’s already improving
the lives of people.

It’s already changing the way
the rest of us think about Los Angeles.

This is more than just infrastructure.

We’re building new lives for ourselves.

It’s a movement that includes
local food, urban agriculture,

craft beer, the maker movement,

tech and design – all of these things,
early indicators of a really radical shift

in the way we build cities.

We’re taking places like this

and transforming them into this.

And soon this.

And this is all exciting and good.

We’re changing the world for the better.

Good for us!

And it is awesome – I mean that.

But our history of sprawl,

and from what we can already see
with these catalyst projects today,

we know and must remember

that big changes like this
don’t usually benefit everyone.

The market forces unleashed
by this cultural momentum

often include the seemingly unstoppable

and inevitable cycle of rising taxes,
prices and rents.

This is urgent.

If we care, we have to stand up

and speak out.

This should be a call to action,

because the answer can’t be
to not improve communities.

The answer can’t be to not build parks
and transit and grocery stores.

The answer can’t be
to hold communities down

just to keep them affordable.

But we do have to follow through
and address the financial realities

that we’re facing.

This is hard, and it won’t
happen on its own.

We can do it, and I’m committed
to this goal in Atlanta,

to sticking up again for people
who made it possible in the first place.

We can’t call it a success without them.

I certainly can’t,

because the people I made
commitments to all those years

weren’t abstract populations.

They’re my friends and neighbors.

They’re people that I love.

So even though it started
as my graduate thesis

and I’m working hard for 16 years
with thousands of people

to help make this thing come to life,

I know and believe that who
the BeltLine is being built for

is just as important
as whether it’s built at all.

Not just in Atlanta,

but locally and globally,

we have to understand

this accountability to the people
whose lives we are changing,

because this is us.

We are the lives we’re talking about.

These places aren’t inevitable.

The places we live aren’t inevitable,

and if we want something different,
we just need to speak up.

We have to ensure that change
comes on our terms.

And to do that,

we have to participate actively
in the process of shaping change.

Thank you.

(Applause)

这张

照片来自我

90 年代中期在巴黎上大学时在国外度过一年的地铁卡。

我的朋友说我看起来
像一个法国无政府主义者——

(笑声)

但这仍然是我

早上照镜子时看到的。

在巴黎生活的一个月内,
我减掉了 15 磅,

而且我的体型达到了我一生中最好的状态,

因为我吃的是新鲜的食物,

而且我走到哪里都可以走路。

在亚特兰大郊区长大,

该地区主要
由高速公路和汽车建造,


以蔓延的典型而闻名,

巴黎从根本上改变
了我

对周围世界建设的理解方式

,我痴迷于
基础设施的作用 ——

这不仅仅是将人们
从 A 点转移到 B 点

的方式,它不仅仅是输送水
、污水或能源的方式

,它还是我们经济的基础。

它是我们社会生活和文化的基础,对我们的生活方式

非常
重要。

当我回到家时,当我穿过周边高速公路的顶端时,
我立刻感到沮丧,

堵在了车流中

我不仅没有动任何肌肉,

我也没有

与成千上万像
我一样从我身边疾驰而过的人进行社交互动

,他们的眼睛朝前
,音乐响亮。

我想知道这是否
是不可避免的结果,

或者我们可以做些什么。

是否有可能将
亚特兰大的这种情况

转变为
我想要居住的地方?

我回到
了建筑和城市规划的研究生院,

对基础设施产生了兴趣,

并在 1999 年

为我的论文项目提出了一个想法:

将一条废弃
的旧铁路环绕市中心的环路改造

为城市振兴的新基础设施

这只是一个想法。

我从没想过
我们会真正建造它。

但我去
了一家建筑公司工作

,最终和
我的同事讨论了这件事

,他们很喜欢这个主意。

随着我们开始
与更多人谈论它,

更多人想听到它。

In the summer of 2001,

we connected with Cathy Woolard,

who was soon elected
city council president.

我们围绕这个想法建立了一个全市范围的愿景

:亚特兰大环线,一条 22 英里

的交通、小径和改造环路。

在两年
半的时间里,我每周开两次

和三次会议,Cathy 和她的员工
以及少数志愿者也是如此。

我们一起建立了这种令人惊叹
的人员和思想运动。

其中包括
习惯于与事物抗争的社区倡导者,

但他们发现亚特兰大环线
是他们可以为之奋斗的东西;

看到

机会利用
城市的许多新增长点的开发商;

以及数十个非营利合作伙伴
,他们认为他们的使命

至少部分
通过共同愿景完成。

现在,通常这些人
不是在同一张桌子上

想要相同的结果。

但是我们在那里
,这有点奇怪,

但它真的非常强大。

亚特兰大人民
爱上了一个

比他们通过汽车挡风玻璃看到的更好的愿景

,亚特兰大人民实现了它

,我向你保证
,否则我们不会建造它。

从一开始,
我们的联盟就多元化。

形形色色的
人都是我们故事的一部分。

经济低端的人也喜欢它。

他们只是担心

在它建成时他们无法在那里
,他们会被定价。

我们以前都听过
这样的故事,对吧?

但我们
承诺亚特兰大环线会有所不同

,人们接受了这个想法

,他们把它做得
比我们

一开始想象的要好,

包括
对住房、

新公园、艺术、植物园的大量补贴——
一份清单 继续增长。

我们建立

了实现这一目标所需的组织和机构。

重要的是,它是。

现在我们处于实施的早期阶段
,它正在发挥作用。

第一条干线
路段于 2012 年开通

,已产生
超过 30 亿美元

的私营部门投资。

但它不仅改变
了城市的物理形态,

还改变了
我们对城市的看法,

以及我们
对居住在那里的期望。

大约一个月前,

我不得不带我的孩子
去杂货店

,他们抱怨这件事,

因为他们不想
上车。

他们说:“爸爸,如果我们必须去,

我们至少可以骑自行车吗?”

我说:“我们当然可以。

亚特兰大人就是这样做的。

我们骑自行车去杂货店。”

(笑声)

(掌声)

谢谢,是的。

现在,他们不知道这
有多荒谬,

但我知道。

而且我也
明白他们对亚特兰大的期望

是非常强大的。

这种
转变就像

上个世纪

的蔓延,我们
对高速公路和汽车的投资

从根本上改变了美国人的生活。

那不是什么大阴谋。

当然,其中有
阴谋。

但这是一种文化动力。

数百万人

在很长一段时间内做出了数百万个决定,

这不仅从根本上
改变了我们建设城市的方式,

而且改变了我们对生活的期望

这些变化
是城市扩张的基础。

那时我们还没有把它称为蔓延。

我们称之为未来。

确实如此。

我们得到了
我们想要的所有高速公路、购物中心和死胡同。

这是一个彻底的转变,

但它是由一种文化动力所建立的。

因此,重要的是不要将

我们居住的地方的物理结构与

当时正在发生的其他事情分开。

那时,

在上世纪下半叶,

科学正在治愈疾病

,将我们送上月球

,性革命
正在打破壁垒

,民权运动
开始朝着

实现我们国家的承诺迈进。

电视、娱乐、食品、旅游、
商业——一切都在变化,

公共
部门和私营部门都在勾结

,为我们提供我们想要的生活。

例如,
在高速公路出现之前,联邦公路管理局并不存在。

想想看。

(笑声)

当然,今天重要的是
要理解和

承认这些好处是
为某些群体

而不是其他人带来的。

这不是一种公平的文化动力。

但是,当我们
今天带着惊奇和厌恶的心情看时,也许,

看着我们面前蔓延的大都市,

我们想知道我们是否被困住了。

我们是否受困
于这种不平等的遗留问题?

我们是否被这种反乌托邦式的
交通地狱般的景象困住了?

我们是否陷入了猖獗的
城市流离失所

和环境恶化之中?

我们是否陷入社会孤立

或政治两极分化?

这些是不可避免的
和永久的结果吗?

或者它们

是我们为自己做出的集体文化决定的结果?

如果它们是,

我们不能改变它们吗?


从我们在亚特兰大的经历中学到

的并不是什么异常情况。

类似的故事
到处都在上演,

人们
不仅在改造旧铁路,

还改造退化的城市水道
和过时的道路,

重新改造

他们生活中的所有基础设施。

无论是在纽约

还是在休斯顿

或迈阿密、

底特律、费城、

首尔、香港、新加坡、

多伦多和巴黎,

世界各地的大小城市都在为自己
回收和改造

这些基础设施,

包括
所有催化剂基础设施之母 项目

,洛杉矶河

,同样

从草根运动开始的振兴工作,

已经发展成为一种文化动力

,现在正
处于再次转变

为某种肯定生命的
基础设施的早期阶段,

这个有小径的 公园
、钓鱼、划船

和社区振兴

,当然还有水质
和防洪。

它已经在改善
人们的生活。

它已经改变了
我们其他人对洛杉矶的看法。

这不仅仅是基础设施。

我们正在为自己建立新的生活。

这是一场包括
当地食品、都市农业、

精酿啤酒、创客运动、

技术和设计的运动——所有这些都是我们建设城市方式
发生真正根本性转变的早期迹象

我们正在采取这样的地方

并将它们变成这样。

很快这个。

这一切都是令人兴奋和美好的。

我们正在让世界变得更美好。

对我们好!

它太棒了——我的意思是。

但是我们的扩张历史

,从我们今天已经看到
的这些催化剂项目来看,

我们知道并且必须记住

,像这样的重大变化
通常不会使每个人受益。

这种文化势头所释放的市场力量

通常包括

税收、价格和租金上涨看似不可阻挡和不可避免的循环

这是紧急的。

如果我们在乎,我们就必须站出来

大声说出来。

这应该是号召性用语,

因为答案不可能
是不改善社区。

答案不可能是不建公园
、公交和杂货店。

答案不能只是
为了让社区

负担得起而压制社区。

但我们确实必须坚持
并解决

我们面临的财务现实。

这很难,而且
不会自行发生。

我们可以做到,我
在亚特兰大致力于实现这个目标,

再次支持
那些一开始就让这一切成为可能的人。

没有他们,我们不能称之为成功。

我当然不能,

因为
那些年来我承诺的

人并不是抽象的人群。

他们是我的朋友和邻居。

他们是我爱的人。

因此,即使它
始于我的毕业论文,

并且我与成千上万的人一起努力工作了 16 年

以帮助实现这件事,但

我知道并相信,
为谁建造 BeltLine

与是否为 完全建成。

不仅在亚特兰大,

而且在本地和全球,

我们都必须了解

这种对
我们正在改变生活的人们的责任,

因为这就是我们。

我们就是我们正在谈论的生活。

这些地方并非不可避免。

我们生活的地方不是不可避免的

,如果我们想要不同的东西,
我们只需要说出来。

我们必须确保
改变符合我们的条件。

为此,

我们必须积极
参与塑造变革的过程。

谢谢你。

(掌声)