Irma L. Olguin Jr. How to turn around a city TED

Has anyone here been to Fresno?

OK, good, good.

That’s where I’m from,

where I was born

and where I live today.

For those of you less familiar,

Fresno and the entire
Central Valley of California

is a place that’s built by agriculture:

miles and miles of farmland
for as far as the eye can see

with a couple of large, poor cities
dotting the landscape.

My family, like much
of the local population,

is a family of immigrant farm laborers:

those toiling away in the fields
hoping for a ¢25-an-hour raise.

I didn’t see myself destined
for the glamour of Silicon Valley,

but I did find my way to college,
and something miraculous happened.

I got a job in tech.

And I remember the first time
I didn’t have to count the change

when trying to figure out
how much to tip for pizza delivery,

when I realized that this industry,

the technology industry,

was going to change my life forever.

And I remember thinking to myself,

if it can happen to me,

a poor, queer Brown woman from nowhere,

why can’t it happen
to entire cities of people like me?

And so for the last eight years,

that’s what I’ve been
working on in Fresno:

building a business that could expose
what it takes to cause an entire city –

and not just a select few people in it –

to thrive.

It turns out we only need
three pretty simple ingredients.

Training, proof and community.

So the cornerstone of everything
that we do is job training.

The communities that we work with
are often from very poor populations,

maybe folks who are learning English
as a second language,

maybe they were unhoused,

the formerly incarcerated,

veterans,

folks who are very often
from retail or factory work.

These folks, their issue is not
their ability to learn technical things.

Their problems center on things
that are a lot less obvious.

Things like childcare,

transportation,

hunger,

money.

So those are the things that we focus on.

It can be especially hard on families.

How do you justify learning
to do something like write code

when there are bills to pay?

Wouldn’t it be better for the family
if you just got a job at McDonald’s

and put in as many hours as you can?

Because that’s a check,

and who’s going to watch
your little brother?

That’s what we do as a family;

we pitch in.

But how do you justify
to the people around you

when it looks to them like you’re just
playing around on the computer?

We didn’t invent a new way
to teach JavaScript.

We just focus a lot more

on the things that actually prevent
people from learning it.

In addition to connecting our students
to things like bus tokens

and free regional transit options,

we also just deploy a fleet of vehicles

whose only job is to pick these folks up
before their study groups

and drop them back off after class.

If they need food, we get them food.

We work with food cupboards and pantries,

making sure that boxes of food
are delivered to these students’ homes

with enough for a family
of three to five people.

We connect them to childcare options

that make sense for their schedules
and their budgets.

But most importantly,

because cash is such a center
of energy and decision-making

for these families,

through our apprenticeship program,

we literally pay them to learn.

So not only do they get to earn a wage

and are exposed to real-world work,

but now they also have
that first line on the resume.

The one that’s so hard to get

and the one that builds confidence
in the rest of the world

that you might know
what you’re talking about.

And so you might be thinking to yourself,

“OK, Irma, this sounds great,

but it sounds really expensive.”

So how do you pay for it?

We’ve turned a long-held idea on its head.

We have to stop putting the burden –

the financial burden –

on the student and the families
who are already struggling

and start putting it on the people

and the entities that benefit most
from their untapped potential.

Entities like government,

corporations,

philanthropy.

These are the entities that benefit
from the development of that talent,

and so that’s who we get to pay for it.

Let’s throw back the curtain
on what I’m trying to say here.

Let’s take the government.

The US spends a trillion dollars
scaling up a workforce for this country.

Many of those programs have mixed results,

and while some folks who come out of them
do in fact earn higher wages at the end,

while they’re still learning,

when they’re still in training,

many of these folks can’t also work,

which means that they’re not
bringing home a check,

which means that they’re still
in survival mode,

which means that the people
who would benefit most can’t participate

to begin with.

That’s where a system
like ours makes some sense.

We apply for allocations
of that same kind of money,

and use it to pay people to learn.

We also work with corporations.

QA testing, for example,
is a job that can be taught

and a role that companies
desperately need.

Training up a batch of QA engineers
is low-hanging fruit

and has almost instant
results for companies.

For the companies to invest
in the development of that talent,

it breeds them a local and eager
technology workforce from which to choose.

Companies that are in a growth mode

or who are experiencing
a digital transformation,

they know that the key to their future

is their ability to find,
hire and retain talent.

We can train up entire cohorts

or a generation of junior-level
and apprentice-level technologists

trained directly to their systems,

ready to be hired on day one.

We’ve worked with all kinds of companies,

getting them to pay
for things like tuition

and money for students
to accomplish exactly this goal.

Philanthropy’s interests here
may be even easier to describe.

Foundations and nonprofits,

they want to see their money
put to good use.

Take the Quality Jobs Fund, for example.

It’s a collaborative effort

between the Federal
Home Loan Bank of San Francisco

and the New World Foundation,

and their express mission
is to address inequality

through quality jobs expansion
and skills development.

We apply for allocations or grants
from philanthropies like those,

work with the government dollars
that we just described,

and companies in the way
that we just talked about,

put it all together
to use it to pay people to learn.

So that’s how you pay for it.

Now, what is it that these folks
should learn on?

In our view, it’s real-world
software projects,

because that is the proof.

You see,

all of the software that the world
needs built has to get made.

And so we can leverage talent
from these underrepresented communities

to deliver on that need,

build a training ground for green talent

and also build a really robust business.

We’ll take OnwardUS
as just one example.

It was a rapid-response initiative
in response to COVID

where we partnered with the Kapor Center.

It was adopted by the state of California
and then 10 other states.

The idea was to take displaced workers –

folks who are affected by COVID –

connect them to money
and services and new jobs.

We took a high-level
senior software engineer

who could architect the full platform

and then apprentices
who could execute on that roadmap,

and in 11 days,

we had a functioning prototype.

You see, the local mom-and-pop,

the school district,

the regional manufacturer,

they all have software needs,
and they’re going to pay someone to do it.

With this model,

they can have their solutions
delivered back to them,

but also participate

in the creation of high-growth,
high-wage jobs in their area.

The last ingredient
in our recipe is community.

We need vibrant spaces

that meet the aspirations
of technologists and entrepreneurs,

so we build castles for the underdogs.

We buy blighted buildings in our downtowns
for pennies on the dollar,

improve them,

lease them back out to ourselves
and others in the technology industry.

This creates community around the idea
of leveling up entry-level humans

and builds a shared understanding

and value around what it means
to have access to unlimited talent.

The first project that we did

was a building that had stood empty
for 40 years before we took it over.

We showed up with our tenant list
and our ability to do work.

Our partner showed up with a building
that was empty and decaying.

We painted the walls,

we built a bunch of desks,

we hung a lot of TVs,

and when the coffee shop opened
at the front of that building,

it was like someone had flipped a switch
on that corner of downtown.

Suddenly, there were a thousand
students and tenants

and community members visiting
that building each day.

These ingredients,

when you take them all together,

they produce real impact
driven by real change

that affect real people

who have names and faces
and families and pets.

Just one quick example.

Our pal, Miguel,

who was once incarcerated,

he didn’t have any prospects
for his future,

his professional life
or really, his family.

He was scholarshiped
through our pre-apprenticeship program

using government dollars.

Miguel veered just to the left
of computer programming,

landed neck-deep in analytics
and website funnels.

He apprenticed for our digital
marketing program.

Eighteen months later,

Miguel has a full-time job,

a great salary,

benefits and a matching 401(k).

We’ve worked with over 5,000 students,

and of those entering our career programs,

over 80 percent earn technical employment.

And in Fresno, this means
that the new technology workforce

is greater than 50 percent female
or gender nonconforming,

greater than 50 percent minority or Latinx

and 20 percent first-generation.

And those demographics mirror
the demographics of our county.

These are folks leaving restaurant,
retail, factory and field labor,

earning on average
less than 20,000 dollars a year,

exiting the programs
earning 60-80,0000 dollars a year.

That’s gas in the tank
and rent paid on time.

And when you do that enough times,

you see more sandwiches being purchased
at the local panini shop;

newer, more reliable cars
taking these folks to work;

the tax base improving,

which invests in schools
and rebuilds roads;

homes in those communities
that are being built or bought

by the people who are actually
going to live in them;

dilapidated buildings
that once stood empty

now full of energized underdogs
sipping coffee and writing code

and, most importantly,

bringing with them the next
generation of human

that didn’t see themselves
leaving the packing house

until they saw their pal make it work.

And we can do this.

You know, it’s not at all a mystery,

especially now that we’ve spent
10 minutes talking about it.

But we do have to do three very specific
and deliberate things.

Invite the underdog in the front door;

pay them to learn like it’s their job;

and then build them castles
in their hometowns.

It’s worked in Fresno,

it’s working in Bakersfield
and Toledo, Ohio

and it can work in underestimated
cities all over the world.

Thank you so much for your attention.

(Applause)

这里有人去过弗雷斯诺吗?

好,好,好。

那是我来自的

地方,我出生

的地方,以及我今天居住的地方。

对于那些不太熟悉的人来说,

弗雷斯诺和整个
加利福尼亚中央山谷

是一个由农业建造的地方:

一望无际的数英里
农田,

几个大而贫穷的城市
点缀着风景。

我的家人
和当地的大多数人一样,

都是移民农场工人的家庭:

他们在田里劳作,
希望每小时加薪 25 美分。

我并不认为自己注定会
获得硅谷的魅力,

但我确实找到了上大学的路
,奇迹发生了。

我找到了一份技术工作。

我还记得第一次
我不用计算变化来

计算送披萨的小费

时,我意识到这个行业

,科技行业

,将永远改变我的生活。

我记得自己在想,

如果它可以发生在我,

一个不知从何而来的贫穷,古怪的棕色女人身上,

为什么它不能发生
在像我这样的人的整个城市?

所以在过去的八年里,

这就是我
在弗雷斯诺一直在做的事情:

建立一个可以揭示
让整个城市——

而不仅仅是其中的少数人

——繁荣发展的企业。

事实证明,我们只需要
三种非常简单的成分。

培训、证明和社区。

所以我们所做的一切的基石
是职业培训。

我们合作的社区
通常来自非常贫困的人群,

可能是正在学习英语
作为第二语言的人,

可能是无家可归的人

,以前被监禁的人,

退伍军人,

经常
来自零售或工厂工作的人。

这些人,他们的问题不是
他们学习技术的能力。

他们的问题集中在
不太明显的事情上。

诸如育儿、

交通、

饥饿、

金钱之类的事情。

所以这些是我们关注的事情。

这对家庭来说尤其困难。 当有账单要付时,

你如何证明
学习做一些像写代码这样的事情是合理的

如果您刚在麦当劳找到一份

工作并尽可能多地投入工作,那对家庭不是更好吗?

因为那是一张支票

,谁会看着
你的小弟弟?

这就是我们作为一个家庭所做的事情;

我们参与进来。

但是

当周围的人看起来你只是
在电脑上玩耍时,你如何向他们证明自己的合理性呢?

我们没有发明一种新的方式
来教授 JavaScript。

我们只是更多地关注

那些实际上阻止
人们学习它的事情。

除了将我们的
学生与公共汽车代币

和免费的区域交通选择等联系起来之外,

我们还部署了一支车队,

他们唯一的工作就是
在他们的学习小组之前接这些人,

并在课后将他们送回。

如果他们需要食物,我们会给他们食物。

我们与食品柜和食品储藏室合作,

确保将一箱盒
食物送到这些学生的

家中,足够一个
三到五口之家食用。

我们将他们与

对他们的日程安排和预算有意义的托儿选项联系起来

但最重要的是,

因为现金是这些家庭
的能量和

决策中心,

通过我们的学徒计划,

我们确实付钱让他们学习。

因此,他们不仅可以获得工资

并接触到现实世界的工作,

而且现在他们
的简历上也有第一行。

一个很难得到

,一个可以让你
对世界其他地方建立信心

,你可能
知道你在说什么。

所以你可能会想,

“好吧,Irma,这听起来不错,

但听起来真的很贵。”

那么你如何支付呢?

我们颠覆了一个长期持有的想法。

我们必须停止将负担

  • 经济负担 -

放在
已经在苦苦挣扎的学生和家庭身上,

并开始把它放在

那些
从他们未开发的潜力中受益最多的人和实体身上。

政府、

企业、

慈善机构等实体。

这些是从人才发展中受益的实体

,所以这就是我们要为此付出代价的人。

让我们揭开
我在这里想说的话的帷幕。

让我们看看政府。

美国花费一万亿美元
为这个国家增加劳动力。

其中许多项目的结果好坏参半,虽然从这些项目中

出来的一些
人实际上最终获得了更高的工资,

但他们仍在学习,

还在接受培训时,

这些人中的许多人也不能 工作,

这意味着他们没有
把支票带回家,

这意味着他们仍
处于生存模式,

这意味着
最受益的人一开始就无法

参与。

这就是
像我们这样的系统有意义的地方。

我们申请
分配同样的钱,

并用它来支付人们学习的费用。

我们还与企业合作。

例如,QA 测试
是一项可以教授的工作,也是

公司
迫切需要的角色。

培训一批 QA 工程师是一件容易的事,

而且对公司来说几乎是立竿见影的
效果。

为了让公司投资
于人才的发展,

它为他们培养了一支本地的、热切的
技术劳动力可供选择。

处于增长模式

或正在
经历数字化转型的公司,

他们知道他们未来的关键

是他们寻找、
雇用和留住人才的能力。

我们可以培训整个团队

或一代初级
和学徒级技术

人员,直接接受他们的系统培训,

准备在第一天被雇用。

我们与各种公司合作,

让他们为学生
支付学费

和金钱等费用,
以实现这一目标。

慈善事业在这里的兴趣
可能更容易描述。

基金会和非营利组织,

他们希望看到他们的
资金得到充分利用。

以优质就业基金为例。

是旧金山联邦住房贷款银行

和新世界基金会之间的合作努力

,他们的明确使命

通过高质量的就业扩张
和技能发展来解决不平等问题。

我们
从类似的慈善机构申请拨款或赠款

,使用
我们刚才描述的政府资金,

以及
我们刚才谈到的公司,

把它们放在一起
,用它来支付人们学习的费用。

所以这就是你支付它的方式。

现在,这些人
应该学习什么?

在我们看来,这是现实世界的
软件项目,

因为这就是证明。

你看

,世界
需要构建的所有软件都必须制造出来。

因此,我们可以利用
这些代表性不足的社区的人才

来满足这一需求,

为绿色人才建立培训基地,

并建立一个真正强大的业务。

我们将以
OnwardUS 为例。

这是

我们与卡波尔中心合作的一项针对 COVID 的快速响应计划。

它被加利福尼亚州
和其他 10 个州采用。

这个想法是让流离失所的工人——

受 COVID 影响的人——

将他们与金钱
、服务和新工作联系起来。

我们聘请了

一位可以构建完整平台的高级高级软件工程师

,然后
是可以执行该路线图的学徒

,在 11 天内,

我们有了一个可运行的原型。

你看,当地的夫妻

、学区

、地区制造商,

他们都有软件需求
,他们会花钱请人去做。

通过这种模式,

他们可以将他们的解决方案
交付给他们,

同时也可以参与

在他们所在地区创造高增长、
高工资的工作。 我们食谱中

的最后一个成分
是社区。

我们需要充满活力的空间

来满足
技术人员和企业家的愿望,

因此我们为弱者建造城堡。

我们花几分钱在市中心购买破旧的建筑物

改善它们,

然后将它们出租给我们自己
和技术行业的其他人。

这围绕着提升入门级人才的想法创建了社区,

并围绕获得无限人才的意义建立了共同的理解

和价值观

我们做的第一个项目

是一座空置了 40 年的建筑,
后来我们接管了它。

我们带着我们的租户名单
和我们的工作能力出现了。

我们的搭档带着
一栋空荡荡的破旧建筑出现了。

我们粉刷了墙壁

,建了一堆桌子

,挂了很多电视

,当
那栋大楼前面的咖啡店开张时,

就好像有人在市中心的那个角落按下了开关

突然间,每天都有一千名
学生、租户

和社区成员参观
那栋大楼。

这些成分,

当你把它们放在一起时,

它们会产生真正的影响,这些影响
是由真正的变化驱动的,这些变化

会影响

有名字、有面孔
、有家人和宠物的真实的人。

只是一个简单的例子。

我们的朋友 Miguel

曾经被监禁,


对自己的未来、

职业生涯
或真正的家庭没有任何前景。

他使用政府资金
通过我们的学徒前计划获得奖学金

米格尔转向
计算机编程的左侧,

深入分析
和网站漏斗。

他是我们数字
营销计划的学徒。

十八个月后,

米格尔有了一份全职工作

、高薪、

福利和匹配的 401(k)。

我们与 5,000 多名学生合作

,在进入我们职业计划的学生中,

超过 80% 获得了技术工作。

在弗雷斯诺,这
意味着新技术劳动力

的女性
或性别不合格者

超过 50%,少数族裔或拉丁裔超过 50%

,第一代超过 20%。

这些人口统计数据反映
了我们县的人口统计数据。

这些人离开餐馆、
零售店、工厂和现场劳动力,

平均年收入
不到 20,000 美元,

退出计划,年
收入 60-80,0000 美元。

那是油箱里的汽油
和按时支付的租金。

当你这样做的次数足够多时,

你会看到
在当地的帕尼尼店购买了更多的三明治; 带这些人上班的

更新、更可靠的汽车

改善税收基础

,投资学校
和重建道路;

这些社区
中的房屋


实际居住在其中的人建造或购买;

曾经空无一人的破旧建筑

现在充满了精力充沛的弱者,他们
喝着咖啡和编写代码

,最重要的是,

带来了
下一代人

他们在看到他们的朋友成功之前,他们才看到自己离开了包装厂。

我们可以做到这一点。

你知道,这根本不是什么谜,

尤其是现在我们已经花了
10 分钟讨论它。

但我们确实必须做三件非常具体
和深思熟虑的事情。

邀请前门的弱者;

付钱让他们学习,就像这是他们的工作;

然后
在他们的家乡建造城堡。

它在弗雷斯诺

工作,在贝克斯菲尔德
和俄亥俄州托莱多

工作,它可以在世界各地被低估的
城市工作。

非常感谢您的关注。

(掌声)