My 500 house in Detroit and the neighbors who helped me rebuild it Drew Philp

In 2009, I bought a house
in Detroit for 500 dollars.

It had no windows,
no plumbing, no electricity

and it was filled with trash.

The first floor held nearly
10,000 pounds of garbage,

and that included the better part
of a Dodge Caravan,

cut into chunks with a reciprocating saw.

(Laughter)

I lived nearly two years without heat,

woke up out of a dead sleep
multiple times to gunshots,

was attacked by a pack of wild dogs

and ripped my kitchen cabinets
from an abandoned school

as they were actively tearing
that school down.

This, of course, is the Detroit
that your hear about.

Make no mistake, it’s real.

But there’s another Detroit, too.

Another Detroit that’s more hopeful,

more innovative,

and may just provide some of the answers

to cities struggling to reinvent
themselves everywhere.

These answers, however, do not
necessarily adhere to conventional wisdom

about good development.

I think Detroit’s real strength
boils down to two words:

radical neighborliness.

And I wasn’t able to see it myself
until I lived there.

About a decade ago,

I moved to Detroit with no friends,
no job and no money,

at a time when it seemed
like everyone else was moving out.

Between 2000 and 2010,

25 percent of the city’s population left.

This included about half
of the elementary-aged children.

This was after six decades of decline.

A city built for almost two million
was down to less than 800,000.

What you usually don’t hear
is that people didn’t go very far.

The population of the Detroit
metro area itself

has largely remained steady
since the ’70s.

Most people who left Detroit
just went to the suburbs,

while the 139 square miles
of the city deteriorated,

leaving some estimates as high
as 40 square miles of abandoned land –

about the size of San Francisco.

Aside from platitudes such as the vague
and agentless “deindustrialization,”

Detroit’s exodus can be summed up
with two structures:

freeways and walls.

The freeways,

coupled with massive
governmental subsidies

for the suburbs via
infrastructure and home loans,

allowed people to leave the city at will,

taking with it tax base,
jobs and education dollars.

The walls made sure
only certain people could leave.

In multiple places,

brick and concrete walls
separate city and suburbs,

white and black,

running directly across municipal streets

and through neighborhoods.

They’re mere physical manifestations
of racist housing practices

such as redlining,

[Denying services to people of color]

restrictive covenants

and outright terror.

In 1971, the Ku Klux Klan
bombed 10 school buses

rather than have them transport
integrated students.

All these have made Detroit
the most racially segregated metro area

in the United States.

I grew up in a small town in Michigan,

the son of a relatively
blue-collar family.

And after university,
I wanted to do something –

probably naïvely –

to help.

I didn’t want to be one of the almost
50 percent of college graduates

leaving the state at the time,

and I thought I might use
my fancy college education at home

for something positive.

I’d been reading this great
American philosopher named Grace Lee Boggs

who happened to live in Detroit,

and she said something I can’t forget.

“The most radical thing
that I ever did was to stay put.”

I thought buying a house might
indelibly tie me to the city

while acting as a physical protest
to these walls and freeways.

Because grants and loans
weren’t available to everyone,

I decided I was going
to do this without them

and that I would wage my personal fight

against the city that had loomed
over my childhood with power tools.

I eventually found an abandoned house
in a neighborhood called Poletown.

It looked like the apocalypse
had descended.

The neighborhood was prairie land.

A huge, open expanse of waist-high grass

cluttered only by a handful
of crippled, abandoned structures

and a few brave holdouts
with well-kept homes.

Just a 15-minute bike ride
from the baseball stadium downtown,

the neighborhood was positively rural.

What houses were left looked like
cardboard boxes left in the rain;

two-story monstrosities
with wide-open shells

and melted porches.

One of the most striking things
I remember were the rosebushes,

forgotten and running wild
over tumbled-down fences,

no longer cared for by anyone.

This was my house on the day
I boarded it up

to protect it from the elements
and further decay.

I eventually purchased it
from the county in a live auction.

I’d assumed the neighborhood was dead.

That I was some kind of pioneer.

Well, I couldn’t have been more wrong.

I was in no way a pioneer,

and would come to understand
how offensive that is.

One of the first things I learned
was to add my voice to the chorus,

not overwrite what was already happening.

(Voice breaking) Because
the neighborhood hadn’t died.

It had just transformed in a way
that was difficult to see

if you didn’t live there.

Poletown was home
to an incredibly resourceful,

incredibly intelligent
and incredibly resilient community.

It was there I first experienced
the power of radical neighborliness.

During the year I worked
on my house before moving in,

I lived in a microcommunity
inside Poletown,

founded by a wild and virtuous farmer
named Paul Weertz.

Paul was a teacher
in a Detroit public school

for pregnant and parenting mothers,

and his idea was to teach
the young women to raise their children

by first raising plants and animals.

While the national average graduation rate
for pregnant teens is about 40 percent,

at Catherine Ferguson Academy
it was often above 90,

in part due to Paul’s ingenuity.

Paul brought much of this innovation
to his block in Poletown,

which he’d stewarded
for more than 30 years,

purchasing houses
when they were abandoned,

convincing his friends to move in
and neighbors to stay

and helping those who wanted
to buy their own and fix them up.

In a neighborhood where many blocks
now only hold one or two houses,

all the homes on Paul’s block stand.

It’s an incredible testament
to the power of community,

to staying in one place

and to taking ownership
of one’s own surroundings –

of simply doing it yourself.

It’s the kind of place where black doctors
live next to white hipsters

next to immigrant mothers from Hungary

or talented writers
from the jungles of Belize,

showing me Detroit
wasn’t just black and white,

and diversity could flourish
when it’s encouraged.

Each year, neighbors assemble to bale hay
for the farm animals on the block,

teaching me just how much
a small group of people can get done

when they work together,

and the magnetism of fantastical
yet practical ideas.

Radical neighborliness is every house
behind Paul’s block burning down,

and instead of letting it fill up
with trash and despair,

Paul and the surrounding community
creating a giant circular garden

ringed with dozens of fruit trees,
beehives and garden plots

for anyone that wants one,

helping me see that our challenges
can often be assets.

It’s where residents are experimenting
with renewable energy and urban farming

and offering their skills
and discoveries to others,

illustrating we don’t necessarily
have to beg the government

to provide solutions.

We can start ourselves.

It’s where, for months,

one of my neighbors
left her front door unlocked

in one of the most violent
and dangerous cities in America

so I could have a shower
whenever I needed to go to work,

as I didn’t yet have one.

It was when it came time to raise
the beam on my own house

that holds the structure aloft –

a beam that I cut out of an abandoned
recycling factory down the street

when not a single wall
was left standing –

a dozen residents of Poletown
showed up to help lift it, Amish style.

Radical neighborliness is a zygote
that grows into a worldview

that ends up in homes and communities
rebuilt in ways that respect humanity

and the environment.

It’s realizing we have the power
to create the world anew together

and to do it ourselves
when our governments refuse.

This is the Detroit that you
don’t hear much about.

The Detroit between
the ruin porn on one hand

and the hipster coffee shops

and billionaires
saving the city on the other.

There’s a third way to rebuild,

and it declines to make
the same mistakes of the past.

While building my house,

I found something
I didn’t know I was looking for –

what a lot of millennials

and people who are moving
back to cities are looking for.

Radical neighborliness is just
another word for true community,

the kind bound by memory and history,

mutual trust and familiarity
built over years and irreplaceable.

And now, as you may have heard,

Detroit is having a renaissance

and pulling itself up
from the ashes of despair,

and the children and grandchildren
of those who fled are returning,

which is true.

What isn’t true is that this renaissance
is reaching most Detroiters,

or even more than a small fraction of them

that don’t live in the central
areas of the city.

These are the kind of people
that have been in Detroit for generations

and are mostly black.

In 2016 alone,

just last year,

(Voice breaking) one in six
houses in Detroit

had their water shut off.

Excuse me.

The United Nations has called this
a violation of human rights.

And since 2005, one in three houses –

think about this, please –

one in every three houses
has been foreclosed in the city,

representing a population
about the size of Buffalo, New York.

(Sniffles)

One in three houses foreclosed is not
a crisis of personal responsibility;

it is systemic.

Many Detroiters, myself included,

are worried segregation
is now returning to the city itself

on the coattails of this renaissance.

Ten years ago,

it was not possible
to go anywhere in Detroit

and be in a crowd
completely made of white people.

Now, troublingly, that is possible.

This is the price that we’re paying
for conventional economic resurgence.

We’re creating two Detroits,
two classes of citizens,

cracking the community apart.

For all the money and subsidies,

for all the streetlights installed,

the dollars for new stadiums
and slick advertisements

and positive buzz,

we’re shutting off water
to tens of thousands of people

living right on the Great Lakes,

the world’s largest source of it.

Separate has always meant unequal.

This is a grave mistake for all of us.

When economic development
comes at the cost of community,

it’s not just those
who have lost their homes

or access to water who are harmed,

but it breaks little pieces
of our own humanity as well.

None of us can truly be free,

none of us can truly be comfortable,

until our neighbors are, too.

For those of us coming in,

it means we must make sure
we aren’t inadvertently contributing

to the destruction of community again,

and to follow the lead

of those who have been working
on these problems for years.

In Detroit, that means average citizens
deputizing themselves

to create water stations and deliveries
for those who have lost access to it.

Or clergy and teachers
engaging in civil disobedience

to block water shutoff trucks.

It’s organizations buying back
foreclosed homes for their inhabitants

or fighting misinformation
on forced sales through social media

and volunteer-run hotlines.

For me, it means helping others
to raise the beams

on their own formerly abandoned houses,

or helping to educate
those with privilege,

now increasingly moving into cities,

how we might come in and support

rather than stress existing communities.

It’s chipping in when
a small group of neighbors decides

to buy back a foreclosed home

and return the deeds to the occupants.

And for you, for all of us,

it means finding a role to play
in our own communities.

It means living your life as a reflection
of the world that you want to live in.

It means trusting those
who know the problems best –

the people who live them –

with solutions.

I know a third way is possible
because I have lived it.

I live it right now

in a neighborhood called Poletown

in one of the most
maligned cities in the world.

If we can do it in Detroit,

you can do it wherever you’re from, too.

What I’ve learned over the last decade,

building my house,

wasn’t so much about wiring
or plumbing or carpentry –

although I did learn these things –

is that true change, real change,

starts first with community,

with a radical sense
of what it means to be a neighbor.

It turned at least one
abandoned house into a home.

Thank you.

(Applause)

2009年,我
在底特律花500美元买了一套房子。

它没有窗户,
没有管道,没有电

,而且到处都是垃圾。

一楼有近
10,000 磅的垃圾

,其中
包括一辆道奇大篷车的大部分,

用往复锯切成块。

(笑声)

我在没有暖气的情况下生活了将近两年,多次在枪声

中从死睡中醒来

被一群野狗袭击,


从一所废弃学校撕毁我的厨柜,

因为他们正在积极拆毁
那所学校。

当然,这
就是你听说的底特律。

不要误会,这是真的。

但也有另一个底特律。

另一个更有希望、

更具创新性的底特律

,可能只是为各地

努力重塑
自我的城市提供了一些答案。

然而,这些答案并不
一定符合

关于良好发展的传统智慧。

我认为底特律的真正实力
归结为两个词:

激进的睦邻。 直到

我住在那里,我才能亲眼看到它

大约十年前,

我搬到了底特律,没有朋友,
没有工作,也没有钱,

当时似乎
其他人都搬出去了。

2000 年至 2010 年间,

该市 25% 的人口离开了。

这包括大约一半
的小学生。

这是在经历了六年的衰退之后。

一座耗资近 200 万建造的城市,现在
却减少到不到 80 万。

你通常听不到
的是人们并没有走得很远。 自 70 年代以来,

底特律
都会区本身的

人口基本保持稳定

大多数离开底特律的人
只是去了郊区,

而这座 139 平方英里
的城市恶化了,

一些人估计有
高达 40 平方英里的废弃土地——

大约相当于旧金山的面积。

除了诸如模糊
和无代理人的“去工业化”

之类的陈词滥调之外,底特律的外流可以
用两种结构来概括:

高速公路和围墙。

高速公路,

加上
政府

通过
基础设施和住房贷款为郊区提供的巨额补贴,

让人们可以随意离开城市,

带走税基、
就业和教育资金。

墙壁确保
只有某些人可以离开。

在多个地方,

砖墙和混凝土墙
将城市和郊区分开,

白色和黑色,

直接穿过市政街道

和社区。

它们仅仅
是种族主义住房做法的物理表现,

例如红线、

[拒绝为有色人种提供服务]

限制性契约

和彻头彻尾的恐怖。

1971 年,Ku Klux Klan
炸毁了 10 辆校车,

而不是让它们运送
综合学生。

所有这些都使
底特律成为美国种族隔离最严重的都会

区。

我在密歇根州的一个小镇长大,

是一个相对
蓝领家庭的儿子。

大学毕业后,
我想做一些事情——

可能是天真的——

来帮忙。

我不想成为当时离开该州的近
50% 的大学毕业生

中的一员

,我想我可能会利用
我在家中

接受的大学教育来做一些积极的事情。

我一直在读
一位名叫格蕾丝·李·博格斯的伟大美国哲学家

,他恰好住在底特律

,她说了一些我无法忘记的话。

“我做过的最激进的事情
就是留在原地。”

我认为买房可能会将
我与这座城市不可磨灭地联系在一起,

同时作为
对这些墙壁和高速公路的物理抗议。

因为
不是每个人都可以获得赠款和贷款,

所以我决定在
没有他们的情况下这样做

,并且我将

与这座城市展开我个人的战斗,这座城市在我童年时代就已经出现
了电动工具。

我最终在一个叫 Poletown 的社区里找到了一座废弃的房子

天启
似乎已经降临。

附近是草原。

一大片齐腰高的开阔草地,

只有
少数残废的废弃建筑

和一些
拥有维护良好房屋的勇敢抵抗者杂乱无章。

从市中心的棒球场骑自行车只需 15 分钟,

这个社区非常乡村。

剩下的房子就像
雨中的纸箱;

两层楼的怪物,
有着敞开的贝壳

和融化的门廊。 我记得

最引人注目的事情之一
是玫瑰丛,

被遗忘了,
在倒塌的栅栏上狂奔,

不再被任何人照顾。

这是我的房子,那天
我用木板封住它

以保护它免受
风吹雨打和进一步腐烂。

我最终
在现场拍卖中从该县购买了它。

我以为附近已经死了。

我是某种先驱。

好吧,我大错特错了。

我绝不是先驱,

并且会明白
这是多么令人反感。

我学到的第一件事
就是将我的声音添加到合唱中,

而不是覆盖已经发生的事情。

(破音)
因为邻居还没有死。

它刚刚以一种

你不住在那里的方式发生了变化。

Poletown
是一个足智多谋、

非常聪明
和非常有弹性的社区的所在地。

在那里,我第一次体验
到激进睦邻的力量。


我搬进来之前的那一年里,我住在

Poletown 内的一个微型社区,

该社区由一位名叫 Paul Weertz 的狂野善良的农民创立

保罗
是底特律一所公立学校

的孕妇和育儿母亲的老师

,他的想法是
教年轻女性

通过首先饲养植物和动物来抚养孩子。

虽然全国
怀孕少女的平均毕业率约为 40%,但

在凯瑟琳弗格森学院
,毕业率通常高于 90

,部分原因是保罗的聪明才智。

Paul 将大部分创新
带到了他在 Poletown 的街区

,他已经管理
了 30 多年,在

房屋
被遗弃时购买房屋,

说服他的朋友搬进来
,让邻居留下来,

并帮助那些
想买自己的房子和 修复它们。

在一个许多街区
现在只有一两栋房子的社区里

,保罗街区的所有房屋都矗立着。

这是
对社区力量

、留在一个地方


拥有自己周围环境的所有权的令人难以置信的证明

——只需自己动手。

在这种地方,黑人医生
和白人

时髦人士、匈牙利移民母亲


伯利兹丛林中的才华横溢的作家一起生活,这

向我展示了
底特律不仅仅是非黑即白的,

当它受到鼓励时,多样性可以蓬勃发展。

每年,邻居们都会聚集在一起为
街区里的农场动物打

干草,告诉我
一小群人

一起工作可以完成多少工作,

以及奇妙
而实用的想法的吸引力。

激进的邻里关系是保罗街区后面的每一栋房子都被
烧毁了,保罗

和周围的社区没有让它
充满垃圾和绝望,而是为任何想要的人

创造了一个巨大的圆形花园,周围

环绕着数十棵果树、
蜂箱和花园地块

帮助我看到我们的挑战
通常可以成为资产。

在这里,居民们正在试验
可再生能源和城市农业,

并将他们的技能
和发现提供给他人,这

说明我们不一定
要乞求

政府提供解决方案。

我们可以自己开始。

几个月来,在美国最暴力和最危险的城市

之一,我的一个邻居
的前门一直没锁

这样我就可以
在需要上班的时候洗个澡,

因为我还没有洗个澡。

是时候抬高
我自己房子的梁了

出现以帮助解除它,阿米什风格。

激进的邻里关系是一种受精卵
,它发展成为一种世界观

,最终以
尊重人类

和环境的方式重建家庭和社区。

它意识到我们有
能力共同创造新的世界,


在我们的政府拒绝时自己去做。

这是你
很少听到的底特律。

一方面是废墟色情片,

另一方面是时髦的咖啡店

和亿万富翁
拯救城市之间的底特律。

还有第三种重建方式

,它拒绝
重蹈过去的覆辙。

在盖房子时,

我发现了一些
我不知道自己在寻找的

东西——许多千禧一代


搬回城市的人们正在寻找的东西。

激进的邻里关系只是
真正社区的另

一种说法,这种社区受到记忆和历史的约束,

多年来建立起来的相互信任和熟悉,不可替代。

而现在,正如你可能听说的那样,

底特律正在复兴,


从绝望的灰烬中振作起来,逃亡者的

子孙正在返回,

这是真的。

不正确的是,这种复兴
正在波及大多数底特律人,

甚至不止一小

部分不居住在
城市中心地区的人。

这些人
世代居住在底特律,

而且大多是黑人。

仅在 2016 年,

就在去年,底特律有

六分之一的房屋(破音)

关闭了水源。

打扰一下。

联合国称这
是对人权的侵犯。

自 2005 年以来,三分之一的房屋——

请想想这个问题——

该市每三所房屋中
就有一所被取消抵押品赎回权

,相当于纽约布法罗的人口规模。

(抽泣)

三分之一的房屋被止赎
不是个人责任危机;

它是系统性的。

许多底特律人,包括我自己在内,

都担心种族隔离
正在

随着这场文艺复兴的到来重新回到城市本身。

十年前,

不可能
去底特律的任何地方,在

完全由白人组成的人群中。

现在,令人不安的是,这是可能的。

这是我们
为传统经济复苏付出的代价。

我们正在创建两个底特律,
两个阶层的公民,

将社区分开。

为了所有的钱和补贴

,为了安装的所有路灯,

为了新体育场
和华丽的广告

和积极的嗡嗡声,

我们正在

为世界上最大的五大湖地区的成千上万的人切断水源 .

分开一直意味着不平等。

这对我们所有人来说都是一个严重的错误。

当经济
发展以牺牲社区为代价时

,受到伤害的不仅仅是
那些失去家园

或无法获得水源的人,

而且它也破坏
了我们自己人性的一小部分。

我们没有人能真正自由,

没有人能真正感到舒适,

直到我们的邻居也一样。

对于我们这些进来的人来说,

这意味着我们必须确保
我们不会在无意中

再次为社区的破坏做出贡献,

并跟随

那些多年来一直
致力于解决这些问题的人的领导。

在底特律,这意味着普通市民

自行创建水站并
为那些无法使用它的人提供供水服务。

或者神职人员和教师
进行公民不服从

以阻止停水车。

是组织
为居民买回止赎房屋,


通过社交媒体和志愿者热线打击有关强制销售的错误信息

对我来说,这意味着帮助其他人

在他们自己以前废弃的房屋上架起横梁,

或者帮助教育
那些

现在越来越多地进入城市的有特权的人,

我们如何进来支持

而不是给现有社区施加压力。


一小群邻居

决定买回丧失抵押品赎回权的房屋

并将契约归还给居住者时,它就会有所作为。

对你来说,对我们所有人来说,

这意味着
在我们自己的社区中找到一个可以发挥的作用。

这意味着你的生活反映
了你想要生活的世界。

这意味着相信
那些最了解问题

的人——那些生活在这些问题中的人——

提供解决方案。

我知道第三种方式是可能的,
因为我经历过它。

我现在住

在世界上最受诟病的城市之一的一个叫 Poletown 的社区

如果我们可以在底特律

做,那么无论你来自哪里,你都可以做。

我在过去十年中学到的东西,

建造我的房子

,不是关于布线
、管道或木工——

尽管我确实学到了这些东西

——真正的改变,真正的改变,

首先从社区开始,从

对成为邻居意味着什么的激进感觉。

它把至少
一栋废弃的房子变成了家。

谢谢你。

(掌声)