Debunking the myth of the Lost Cause A lie embedded in American history Karen L. Cox

Between 1860 and 1861, 11 southern
states withdrew from the United States

and formed
the Confederate States of America.

They left, or seceded, in response
to the growing movement

for the nationwide abolition of slavery.

Mississippi said,

“our position is thoroughly identified
with the institution of slavery.”

South Carolina cited “hostility
on the part of the non-slaveholding states

to the institution of slavery.”

In March 1861, the Vice President
of the Confederacy, Alexander Stevens,

proclaimed that the cornerstone of the new
Confederate government

was white supremacy, or as he put it,

“slavery” and “subordination”
to white people

was the “natural and normal condition”
of Black people in America

and the “immediate cause of the late
rupture and present revolution.”

Three weeks after the now-infamous
Cornerstone Speech,

the American Civil War began.

The conflict lasted four years,
had a death toll of about 750,000,

and ended with the Confederacy’s defeat.

By 1866,
barely a year after the war ended,

southern sources began claiming the
conflict wasn’t actually about slavery.

Meanwhile, Frederick Douglass,

a prominent abolitionist
and formerly enslaved person, cautioned,

“the spirit of secession
is stronger today than ever.”

From the words of Confederate leaders,

the reason for the war could not have
been clearer— it was slavery.

So how did this revisionist history
come about?

The answer lies in the Lost Cause—
a cultural myth about the Confederacy.

The term was coined by Edward Pollard,
a pro-Confederate journalist.

In 1866, he published “The Lost Cause:

A New Southern History
of the War of the Confederates.”

Pollard pointed out that
the U.S. Constitution gave states

the right to govern themselves
independently in all areas

except those explicitly designated
to the national government.

According to him, the Confederacy
wasn’t defending slavery,

it was defending each state’s right
to choose whether or not to allow slavery.

This explanation effectively turned
white southerners’ documented defense

of slavery and white supremacy into a
patriotic defense of the Constitution.

The Civil War had devastated the country,

leaving those who had
supported the Confederacy

grasping to justify their actions.

Many pro-Confederate writers,
political leaders, and others

were quick to adopt and spread
the narrative of the Lost Cause.

One organization,
the United Daughters of the Confederacy,

played a key role in transmitting
the ideas of the Lost Cause

to future generations.

Founded in Nashville, Tennessee,
in 1894,

the UDC united thousands of middle
and upper class white southern women.

The UDC raised thousands of dollars to
build monuments to Confederate soldiers.

These were often unveiled
with large public ceremonies,

and given prominent placements,
especially on courthouse lawns.

The Daughters also placed
Confederate portraits in public schools.

They monitored textbooks to minimize
the horrors of slavery,

and its significance in the Civil War,

passing revisionist history and racist
ideology down through generations.

By 1918, the UDC claimed
over 100,000 members.

As their numbers grew, they increased
their influence outside the South.

Presidents William Howard Taft
and Woodrow Wilson

both met with UDC members
and enabled them to memorialize

the Confederacy
in Arlington National Cemetery.

The UDC still exists and defends
Confederate symbols

as part of a noble heritage of sacrifice
by their ancestors.

Despite the wealth of primary sources

showing that slavery was the root cause
of the Civil War,

the myth about states’ rights
persists today.

In the aftermath of the war,

Frederick Douglass
and his abolitionist contemporaries

feared this erasure of slavery
from the history of the Civil War

could contribute
to the government’s failure

to protect the rights of Black Americans—

a fear that has repeatedly
been proven valid.

In an 1871 address at Arlington Cemetery,
Douglass said:

“We are sometimes asked
in the name of patriotism

to forget the merits
of this fearful struggle,

and to remember with equal admiration
those who struck at the nation’s life,

and those who struck to save it—

those who fought for slavery and those who
fought for liberty and justice. […]

if this war is to be forgotten,
I ask in the name of all things sacred,

what shall men remember?”

1860 年至 1861 年间,南方 11
个州从美国撤出,成立

了美利坚联盟国。

他们离开或分离,以响应

全国范围内日益增长的废除奴隶制运动。

密西西比州说,

“我们的立场
与奴隶制完全一致。”

南卡罗来纳州引用了“
非奴隶制国家

对奴隶制制度的敌意”。

1861 年 3 月,
邦联副总统亚历山大·史蒂文斯

宣布新邦联政府的基石

是白人至上,或者用他的话说,对白人的

“奴役”和“从属”

是“自然和正常的条件”
”美国黑人

和“最近
破裂和当前革命的直接原因”。

在现在臭名昭著的基石演讲三周后

,美国内战开始了。

这场冲突持续了四年,
造成约 750,000 人死亡

,最终以邦联战败告终。

到 1866 年,也
就是战争结束仅仅一年后,

南方的消息来源开始声称这场
冲突实际上与奴隶制无关。

与此同时,著名

的废奴主义
者和曾被奴役的弗雷德里克·道格拉斯警告说,

“今天的分离精神
比以往任何时候都更加强烈。”

从邦联领导人的话来看,

战争的原因再
清楚不过了——这是奴隶制。

那么这段修正主义历史
是如何产生的呢?

答案就在失落的事业中——
一个关于邦联的文化神话。

这个词是由
亲联邦的记者爱德华波拉德创造的。

1866 年,他出版了《失落的事业:

南方
邦联战争的新历史》。

波拉德指出
,美国宪法赋予各州在所有领域

独立自治的权利,

除了明确指定
给国家政府的领域。

据他说,
邦联不是在捍卫奴隶制,

而是在捍卫每个州
选择是否允许奴隶制的权利。

这种解释有效地将
南方白人

对奴隶制和白人至上的有记录的辩护变成了
对宪法的爱国辩护。

内战摧毁了这个国家,

让那些
支持

邦联的人为自己的行为辩护。

许多亲同盟的作家、
政治领袖和其他

人很快就接受并传播
了《失落的事业》的叙述。

一个组织,
联邦的联合女儿,在

将失落的事业的思想传播

给后代方面发挥了关键作用。 UDC 于 1894 年

在田纳西州纳什维尔成立,

联合了数千名中产阶级
和上层阶级的南方白人女性。

UDC 筹集了数千美元来
为邦联士兵建造纪念碑。

这些通常在
大型公共仪式上揭幕,

并被放置在显眼的位置,
尤其是在法院草坪上。

女儿们
还在公立学校放置了邦联肖像。

他们监控教科书,以尽量减少
奴隶制的恐怖

及其在内战中的重要性,

将修正主义历史和种族主义
意识形态代代相传。

到 1918 年,UDC 声称
拥有超过 100,000 名成员。

随着他们人数的增加,他们增加
了在南方以外的影响力。

威廉·霍华德·塔夫脱总统
和伍德罗·威尔逊总统

都与 UDC 成员会面,
并让他们能够

在阿灵顿国家公墓纪念邦联。

UDC 仍然存在并捍卫
同盟符号,

作为其祖先牺牲的崇高遗产的一部分

尽管有大量原始资料

表明奴隶制是内战的根本原因

但关于国家权利的神话
今天仍然存在。

战后,

弗雷德里克·道格拉斯(Frederick Douglass)
和他同时代的废奴主义者

担心,
从内战的历史中抹去奴隶制

可能会
导致政府

未能保护美国黑人的权利——

这种担忧一再
被证明是正确的。 道格拉斯

1871 年在阿灵顿公墓的一次演讲中
说:

“有时
以爱国主义的名义要求我们

忘记
这场可怕斗争的功劳,

并以同样的钦佩之情记住
那些为国家生命

而战的人,以及那些为拯救而战的人。 它——

那些为奴隶制而战的人和那些
为自由和正义而战的人。 […]

如果要忘记这场战争,
我以所有神圣事物的名义问,

人们应该记住什么?”