How to expose the corrupt Peter Eigen

I’m going to speak about corruption but

I would like to drug suppose two

different things one is the large global

economy the large globalized economy and

the other one is a small and very

limited capacity of our traditional

governments and their international

institutions to govern to shape this

economy because it is this this this

asymmetry which creates basically

failing governance failing governance in

many areas in the area of corruption in

the area of destruction of the

environment in the area of rotation of

women and children in the area of

climate change in all the areas in which

we really need a capacity to reintroduce

the primacy of politics into the economy

which is operating in a in a worldwide

arena and I think corruption and the

fight against corruption and the impact

of corruption it’s probably one of the

most interesting ways to illustrate what

I mean with this failure of governance

let me talk about my own experience I

used to work as the director of the

World Bank office in Nairobi for for

East Africa at that time I noticed that

corruption that brand corruption there

systemic corruption was undermining

everything we were trying to do and

therefore I began to not only try to

protect the work of the World Bank our

own projects our own programs against

corruption but in general I thought we

need a system to protect the people in

this part of the world from the ravages

of corruption and as soon as I started

this work

I received a memorandum from the World

Bank from the legal department first in

which they said you are not allowed to

do this you are meddling in the internal

affairs of our partner countries this is

forbidden by the charter of the World

Bank so I want you to stop doing this

in the mean time I was chairing donor

meetings for instance in which the

various donors and many of them like to

be in Nairobi it is true it is one of

the unsafest cities of the world but

they like to be there because the other

cities are even less comfortable and in

these donor meetings I noticed that many

of the worst projects which were put

forward by our clients by the

governments by promoters many often

representing the suppliers from the

north that the worst projects we are

realized first let me give you an

example a huge power project 300 million

dollars to be built smack into one of

the most vulnerable and one of those

beautiful areas of western Kenya and we

all noticed immediately that this

project had no economic benefits it had

no clients nobody would buy the

electricity there nobody was interested

in irrigation projects to the contrary

we knew that this project will destroy

the environment that would destroy

riparian forests which were the basis

for the survival of nomadic groups

Samburu and the Turkana in this area so

everybody knew this is a not a useless

project this is an absolutely damaging a

terrible project not to speak about

future indebtedness of the country for

these hundreds of millions of dollars

and the siphoning off of the scarce

resources of the economy from much more

important activities like schools like

hospitals and so on and yet we all

rejected this project none of the donors

was willing to have their name connected

with

and it was the first project to be

implemented the good projects which we

as donor community will take under our

wings

they took years we had do many studies

and very often they didn’t succeed but

he’s bad products which we are

absolutely damaging for the economy for

many generations for the environment for

thousands of families who had to be

resettled they were suddenly put

together by consortia

of banks of supplier agencies of

insurance agencies like in Germany

aramis and so on and they came back very

very quickly driven by an unholy

alliance between the powerful elites in

the countries there and the suppliers

from the north

now these suppliers were our big

companies three we are the actors of

this global market which I mentioned in

the beginning they were the Simmons’s of

this world coming from France from the

UK from Japan from Canada from Germany

and they were systematically driven by

systematic large-scale corruption and

you are not talking about fifty thousand

dollars here or a hundred thousand

dollars there over 1 million dollars

there no we are talking about 10 million

20 million dollars on the Swiss bank

accounts on the bank accounts of

Liechtenstein of the president’s

ministers the high officials in the

parastatal sectors this was a reality

which I saw not only one project like

that I saw I would say over the years I

worked in Africa for hundreds of

projects like this and so I became

convinced that it is this systemic

corruption which is perverting economic

policymaking in these countries which is

the main reason for the misery as a

poverty for the conflicts for the

violence for the desperation in many of

these countries that we have today more

than a billion people but we know the

absolute poverty line that we

more than a billion people without

proper drinking water in the world twice

that number to more than two billion

people without sanitation and so on and

the consequent illnesses of mothers and

children still tribe mortality of more

than ten million people every year

children dying before they are five

years old the cause of this is to a

large extent grand corruption now why

did the World Bank not let me do this

work I found out afterwards after a left

and Arabic fight to Burbank the reason

was that the members of the World Bank

thought that foreign bribery was okay

including Germany Germany foreign

bribery was allowed it was even

tax-deductible no wonder that most of

the most important international

operators in Germany but also in France

in UK in Scandinavia everywhere

systematically bribe not all of them but

most of them and this is the phenomenon

which I call failing governance because

when I then came to Germany and started

this little NGO here in Berlin the villa

Bozek and we were told you cannot stop

our German exporters from bribing

because we will lose our contract we

will lose to the French we lose to the

Swedes volutes with Japanese and

therefore there was indeed a prisoner’s

dilemma which made it very difficult for

an individual company individual

exporting country to say we are not

going to continue this deadly disastrous

habit of large companies to bribe so

this is what I mean with a failing

governance structure because even the

powerful government which we have in

Germany comparatively was not able to

say we will not allow our companies to

bribe abroad they needed help and the

large companies themselves it is

dilemma many of them didn’t want to

bribe many of the German companies for

instance belief that they are really

producing a high quality product at a

good price so they are very competitive

they are not as good in bribing as many

of their international competitors are

but they were not allowed to show their

strengths because the word was eaten up

by grand corruption and this is why I’m

telling you this civil society role rose

to the occasion

we had a small NGO Transparency

International we began to think of an

escape route from this prisoner’s

dilemma and we developed concepts of

collective action basically trying to

bring various competitors together

around the table explaining to all of

them how much it would be in their

interest if they simultaneously would

stop right and to make a long story

short we managed to eventually get

Germany to sign together with the other

OECD countries and a few other exporters

in 1997 a convention under the auspices

of the OECD which obliged everybody to

change their laws and criminalize

foreign bribery this is thank you I mean

it’s interesting in doing this we had to

sit together with the companies we had

here in Berlin on the Aspen Institute

and on the onesy we had sessions with

about twenty captains of industry and we

discussed with them what to do about

international bribery in the first

session yet three sessions there over

the course of two years and president

from weizsäcker by the way chaired one

of the sessions the first one to to take

the fear away from the entrepreneurs who

we are not used to deal with

mental organizations and in the first

session they all said this is not

private what we are doing this is

customary there this is what these other

cultures demand they even applauded in

fact Martin Weiser still says this today

and so they are serve a lot of people

are not convinced that you have to stop

writing but in the second session they

admitted already that they would never

do this what they are doing in these

other countries here in Germany or in

the UK and so on cabinet ministers would

admit this and in the final session at

the Aspen Institute we had them all sign

an open letter to the core government at

the time requesting that they

participate in the OECD convention and

this is in my opinion an example of soft

power because we we were able to

convince them that they had to go with

us we had a longer term time perspective

we had a broader geographically much

wider constituency we are trying to

defend and that’s why the law has

changed

that’s why Zeman’s is now in the trouble

they are in and that’s why am i n s the

probably in some other countries the

OECD Convention is not yet properly

enforced and again civil society is

breathing down the neck the

establishment in London for instance

where a BAE got away with a huge

corruption case which the Serious Fraud

Office try to prosecute a hundred

million British pounds every year for

ten years to one particular official of

one particular friendly country who then

bought for forty four billion pounds

military equipment this case they are

not prosecuting in the UK why because

they consider this as contrary to the

security interest of the people of Great

Britain civil society is pushing cessful

civil societies is trying to get a

solution to this problem also in the UK

and also in Japan which is not properly

enforcing and so on in Germany we are

pushing the ratification of the UN

Convention there is a subsequent Condor

we are Germany it’s not ratifying why

because it would make it necessary to

criminalize the corruption of Deputies

in Germany we have a system where you

are not allowed to bribe a civil servant

but you are allowed to bribe the deputy

this is under German law allowed and the

members of our Parliament don’t want to

change this and this is why they can’t

sign the UN Convention against foreign

bribery one of the very very few

countries which is preaching honesty and

good governance everywhere in the world

not able to ratify a convention which we

managed to get on the books this about

160 countries all over the world I see

my time is ticking

let me just try to draw some conclusions

what has happened I mean I believe that

what we managed to achieve in fighting

corruption one can also achieve in other

areas of failing governance by now the

United Nations is totally open on our

side the World Bank has turned from

solace to powerless under Wolfensohn

they became I would say the strongest

anti-corruption agency of the world most

of the large companies are now totally

convinced that they have to put in place

very strong policies against bribery and

so on and this is possible because civil

society joined the companies and joined

the government in the analysis of the

problem

in the development of remedies in the

implementation of reforms and then later

in the monitoring of the forms of course

if civil society organizations want to

play that role they have to grow into

this responsibility not all civil

society organizations are good the Ku

Klux Klan is an NGO so we must be aware

that civil society has to shape up

itself they have to have a much more

transparent van

governance you have to have a much more

participatory governance in many civil

society organizations we also need much

more competence of civil society leaders

this is why we have set up the

governance school in the center for

civil society here in Berlin because you

believe most of our educational and

research institutions in Germany and

continental Europe in general do not

focus enough yet on empowering civil

society training the leadership of civil

society but what I’m saying from a very

practical experience if civil society

does it right and enjoying the other

actors in particular governance

governments and the international

institutions but also large

international actors particularly those

which have committed themselves to

corporate social responsibility then in

this magical triangle between civil

society government and private sector

there is a tremendous chance for all of

us to create better work thank you

我将谈论腐败,但

我想假设两件

不同的事情,一件是大型全球

经济,大型全球化经济

,另一件

是我们传统

政府及其国际

机构的小而非常有限的治理能力 塑造这种

经济,因为正是这种这种

不对称导致

治理基本上失败 在许多领域治理失败 在

腐败领域 在破坏

环境领域 在

妇女和儿童轮换领域 在

气候变化领域

我们真正需要有能力将

政治的首要地位重新引入

在全球范围内运作的经济的

领域,我认为腐败和

打击腐败以及

腐败的影响可能是

最有趣的方式之一 说明

我对治理失败的意思

让我谈谈我自己的经历,我

曾经担任过董事 当时我是

世界银行驻内罗毕东非办事处的负责人

,当时我注意到

腐败,那里的品牌腐败

系统性腐败正在破坏

我们试图做的一切,

因此我开始不仅试图

保护世界银行的工作,

自己的项目 我们自己的反腐败计划,

但总的来说,我认为我们

需要一个系统来保护

世界这个地区的人民免受

腐败的蹂躏,当我开始

这项工作时,

我收到了

来自世界银行的法律备忘录 首先

是他们说不允许

你这样做的部门你在干涉

我们伙伴国家的内政这

是世界银行章程所禁止的

所以我希望你

在我担任捐助者主席的同时停止这样做

例如,

各种捐助者和他们中的许多人都

喜欢在内罗毕举行会议,这确实是世界上

最不安全的城市之一,但

他们喜欢在那里,因为 其他

城市就更不自在了,在

这些捐助者会议上,我注意到我们的客户由政府

提出的许多最糟糕的项目,

许多发起人通常

代表来自北方的供应商,

我们首先实现的最糟糕的项目

让我 举个

例子,一个耗资 3 亿美元的大型电力项目

将建

在肯尼亚西部最脆弱和最

美丽的地区之一,我们

都立即注意到这个

项目没有经济效益,

没有客户,没有人会购买

那里的电力没有人

对灌溉项目感兴趣 相反,

我们知道这个项目会

破坏环境,破坏

河岸森林,而河岸森林是该

地区游牧民族桑布鲁和图尔卡纳人生存的基础,

所以

每个人都知道这不是一个 无用的

项目,这是一个绝对破坏性的

可怕项目,更不用说

公司未来的债务了 为

这数亿美元

从更

重要的活动(如学校、

医院等)中抽走稀缺的经济资源而放弃尝试,但我们都

拒绝了这个项目,没有一个捐助

者愿意与他们的名字联系

起来

这是第一个

实施的项目,我们

作为捐助界的好项目将在我们的

翅膀下进行,

他们花了数年时间我们进行了很多研究

,但通常他们没有成功,但

他是我们

对经济绝对有害的坏产品 几代

人以来,为了成千上万个不得不重新安置的家庭的环境,

他们

突然被

银行联盟、供应商机构、

保险机构、保险机构(如德国

阿拉米斯等)联合起来,他们很快就回来

那里国家的有权势的精英和北方的供应商

现在这些供应商是我们的大

公司三我们 是

我一开始提到的这个全球市场的参与者,

他们是这个世界的西蒙斯,他们

来自法国、

英国、日本、加拿大、德国

,他们被

系统性的大规模腐败系统地驱动,

你不是在谈论五十

这里的千美元或

那里的十万美元 超过 100 万美元

没有 我们说的是 1000 万美元

2000 万美元在瑞士

银行账户上

列支敦士登银行账户上 总统

部长的银行账户

半国营部门的高级官员 这是一个现实

我不仅看到了一个这样的项目

,我会说多年来我

在非洲为数百

个这样的项目工作,因此我

确信正是这种系统性

腐败正在扭曲

这些国家的经济决策,这

是主要的 在许多这些国家中,将苦难作为

贫困的原因 冲突的

暴力 绝望的原因

我们今天有

超过 10 亿人,但我们知道

绝对贫困线 我们

有超过 10 亿人没有

适当的饮用水在世界上是

这个数字的两倍,超过 20 亿

人没有卫生设施等等,

以及随之而来的母亲的疾病 而且

儿童仍然部落死亡率

每年超过一千万人

在五岁之前死亡

的原因

很大程度上是现在的严重腐败

为什么世界银行不让我做这项

工作后来我才发现 离开

和阿拉伯人对伯班克的斗争 原因

是世界银行成员认为

包括德国在内的外国

贿赂是可以的 德国允许外国贿赂甚至

可以免税 难怪德国

大多数最重要的国际

运营商也在 法国

、英国、斯堪的纳维亚到处都在

系统地贿赂他们,而不是他们中的

大多数人,这就是

我称之为失败的现象 治理,因为

当我后来来到德国并

在柏林建立了这个小型非政府组织

Bozek 别墅时,我们被告知你不能阻止

我们的德国出口商贿赂,

因为我们将失去我们的合同,我们

将输给法国人,我们输给了

瑞典人的蜗牛 日本人

因此确实存在囚徒

困境,这使得

个别公司个别

出口国很难说我们

不会继续这种

大公司行贿的致命灾难性习惯,所以

这就是我所说的治理结构失败的意思,

因为 即使是

我们在德国拥有的相对强大的政府

也无法

说我们不会允许我们的公司在

国外贿赂他们需要帮助和

大公司本身这是

两难的,他们中的许多人不想

贿赂许多德国公司

例如,他们认为他们真的

以优惠的价格生产出高质量的产品,

因此他们非常有竞争

力 像

他们的许多国际竞争对手一样善于贿赂,

但他们不被允许展示自己的

实力,因为这个词被严重

的腐败吞噬了,这就是为什么我

告诉你这个公民社会角色上升

我们有一个小型非政府组织的场合 透明

国际,我们开始想出

一条摆脱囚徒

困境的方法,我们发展了

集体行动的概念,基本上试图

将各种竞争者聚集

在一起,向他们所有人解释

如果他们同时停下来对他们的利益有多大好处

长话短说,我们最终设法让

德国在 1997 年与其他

经合组织国家和一些其他出口国一起签署了经合组织

主持下的一项公约,该公约

要求每个人都必须

改变他们的法律并将

外国贿赂定为犯罪,这是感谢 你我的意思

是这样做很有趣,

我们不得不与我们在柏林的公司坐在一起

在阿斯彭研究所

,我们与

大约 20 位行业领袖举行了会议,我们

在第一次会议上与他们讨论了如何处理国际贿赂问题,

但在两年的时间里在那里举行了三次会议

,顺便说一句,来自魏茨泽克的主席主持了

一次 这些会议是第一个让

我们不习惯与

精神组织打交道的企业家们摆脱恐惧的会议,在第一次

会议上,他们都说这不是

私人的,我们正在做

什么,这是习惯性的,这是其他

文化 要求他们甚至鼓掌

事实上 Martin Weiser 今天仍然

这么说,所以他们服务了很多

人不相信你必须停止

写作但在第二次会议上他们

已经承认他们永远

不会这样做他们正在做的这些

德国或英国等其他国家

的内阁部长会

承认这一点,在阿斯彭研究所的最后一次会议上

,我们让他们都签署

了一份 当时给核心政府的公开信

要求他们

参加经合组织公约,

我认为这是软实力的一个例子,

因为我们能够

说服他们他们必须和我们一起去,

我们有更长远的时间视角

我们有一个更广泛的地理

范围更广泛的选区,我们正在努力

捍卫,这就是为什么法律已经

改变

这就是为什么 Zeman’s 现在陷入困境

,这就是为什么

在其他一些国家可能

还没有适当执行经合组织公约

再一次,公民社会正在

扼杀

伦敦的机构,例如

,BAE 逃脱了一个巨大的

腐败案件,严重欺诈

办公室试图在

十年内每年向一个特定的特定官员起诉一亿英镑

友好国家随后

以 440 亿英镑的价格购买了

军事装备 这个案子他们

不在英国起诉 为什么

因为 他们认为这违背了

英国人民的安全利益。

正在

推动批准联合国

公约 有一个后续的秃鹰

我们是德国 它没有批准 为什么

因为这将有必要将德国

代表的腐败行为定为刑事犯罪

我们有一个

不允许贿赂公务员的制度,

但你 被允许贿赂代表

这是德国法律允许的

,我们的议会成员不想

改变这一点,这就是为什么他们不能

签署联合国反对外国贿赂公约,

这是极少数正在宣扬的国家之一

世界各地的诚实和善政

无法批准我们

设法将其列入书本的公约

全世界大约 160 个国家 我看到

我的 时间在流逝

让我试着得出一些结论

发生了什么 我的意思是 我相信

我们在打击腐败方面取得的成就 现在

我们也可以在治理失败的其他领域取得成就

联合国完全站在我们

这边 世界

在沃尔芬森的领导下,银行从安慰变成了无能为力,

他们成为我想说

的世界上最强大的反腐败机构,

大多数大公司现在完全

相信他们必须制定

非常强有力的政策来打击贿赂

等等,这是 之所以可能,是因为民间

社会加入了公司和

政府的行列,分析了

在实施改革中制定补救措施的问题

,然后

在监督形式当然

如果民间社会组织想要

发挥他们必须发挥的作用 成长为

这个责任 并非所有民间

社会组织都是好的

三K党是一个非政府组织,所以我们必须

意识到民间社会组织 社会必须

自我塑造 他们必须有一个更

透明的面包车

治理 你必须在许多民间社会组织中拥有更多的

参与性治理

我们还需要

更多的民间社会领袖能力

这就是我们建立

治理学校的原因

在柏林的公民社会中心,因为您

认为我们

在德国和

欧洲大陆的大多数教育和研究机构总体上还没有

足够重视增强公民

社会的权能 培训公民社会的领导力,

但是我说的是非常

实践经验 如果民间社会

做得对并享受其他

行为体,特别是治理

政府和国际

机构,以及大型

国际行为体,特别是

那些承诺

承担企业社会责任的人,那么在

民间

社会政府和私营部门

之间的这个神奇三角中, 对我们所有人来说都是一个巨大的机会

创造更好的工作谢谢