Is Climate Change Even Real A Social Media Experiment

when the pandemic hit

my entire country went into a lockdown

unfortunately we

had to give a paid leave to the house

help and the burden of the chores came

upon my mother and i

it was fine for the first month both of

us enjoyed doing our jobs

and the whole house was clean however

the lockdown was extended

multiple times and over time we started

getting fed up with our chose

and started doing them a little less

frequently

it was still clean enough for us to live

there but the house kept getting dirtier

with each passing week

frustrated by the mess that we lived in

my mother and i

started fighting more frequently

becoming inherently

unhappy we kept passing our chores to

each other

finally last month my grandmother

offered to host

my toddler brother and i for a week and

my mother used that opportunity

to get rid of the clutter in our house

and go back to blog zero

it was on returning that i realized

amidst the gradual progression of

uncleanness in our house

we never really realized how dirty it

had become till we cleaned it up

now during the lockdown locked inside

the four walls of my house

i spent most of my time in the virtual

world the majority of which

is admiring others perfect lives on

social media sites

however i received the shock of my life

in a place where

no person should ever go the youtube

comment section

after an elaborate argument with a

gentleman from kentucky

i was introduced to a social group that

i thought was an urban myth

people who did not believe in climate

change coming from an

environment where climate change was

taught to us from the age of seven

i found it difficult to believe that

people could bluntly deny scientific

facts

then the teenage sleuth went on an

undercover operation

under the fake persona of monsieur ross

eric

and played with the algorithm of various

social media platforms

to truly understand the other side of

the coin

the way social media works is that a

person sees

more of the type of posts which they

engage with

so i purposefully engaged with posts

that disproved or discredited climate

change

i noted down a few of their beliefs and

i am going to present

them with a little paraphrasing just to

remove colorful and descriptive language

that most sane people would find

derogatory pay attention to the parts

that are in green

and the parts in yellow disclaimer

irrespective of how eccentric or

exaggerated they may sound

none of this is made up by me so here we

go

number one climate change is a

conspiracy theory

that one political party created to

control the parliament

there was a historic story that followed

it and the discourse

just accelerated downhill from there the

problem with this theory

is that human beings are not one note

characters in a badly written movie

just because a controversial person

endorses something

does not mean that the thing is wrong

adolf hitler endorsed vegetarianism

during the war

that does not insinuate that

vegetarianism was a conspiracy theory

made by adolf hitler

debatable human beings can often support

positive things

number two the climate change that we

see right now

is a natural cyclic process and human

beings have little to no effect on it

the thing to notice with that statement

is that the first part of it is actually

true

climate change is a cyclic process but

the changes are slow

and subtle if the natural climate cycle

was a pleasant family drive

up a hill the current climate change

scene is a whole

roller coaster ride according to nasa

atmospheric carbon dioxide levels were

less than 280 parts per million before

the industrial phase

370 parts per million in 2000 and is 412

parts per million now

to give some context to these random

numbers carbon dioxide levels are higher

now than any time in the past 800

000 years number three

global warming and carbon dioxide levels

only have a high

correlation to each other and no cause

effect relationship has ever been

established between the two

sometimes you have to refute a fact with

a fact

if you think that a link or a

correlation between global warming and

carbon dioxide levels

is not as serious as a causation let me

remind you that the same analogy is

applicable to another pair of phenomena

there is indeed a very high correlation

between smoking tobacco

and lung cancer but there is no cause

effect relationship there either

so we can smoke our lungs away with no

fear of cancer

just like we are smoking the atmosphere

to ruin our planet’s lungs

the problem is that we can have multiple

pairs of lungs experimented on to

establish that cause-effect relationship

but we only have a single planet number

four

scientists created climate change and it

is their headache to solve it

well if you think hard enough about it

that does make sense it’s not like the

world

heating up and making the planet

uninhabitable directly affects any of

us honestly let us assume this was

real despite the lack of any evidence at

all

what could possibly be better than the

global society uniting to save our

planet

number five people are so gullible how

can they fall for the climate change

trap when even scientists don’t agree on

it

this argument is built on the fact that

three percent of scientists

do not agree with climate change three

percent

how do you ignore the 97 scientists who

do agree

that human causes are significant and

only follow the opinions of those three

percent of them who deny it

look how thin the slice of the pie is

number six and the most common one any

effort made by the human race is futile

because all it takes is one volcanic

eruption to nullify our efforts

while there is no quantitative measure

of how much human efforts have helped

curb climate change

this bold statement confidently states

it

for argument’s sake if we assume

that our efforts were indeed nullified

the fact that we

may have nullified a volcano which could

cause changes in weather patterns for

many years is a massive achievement in

itself

and that volcano was nullified by the

efforts of the few

imagine what the many can achieve

imagine what would have happened

had we not taken those efforts at all

according to the ted speech template

yes there is a template and no it is not

rigid

i am supposed to give a call to action

from this whole incident

but there is no human way that i can

condense it to one

takeaway here is one thing whenever

people wish to spread misinformation

there is always one piece of news that

is true

and baits you to believe the rest of it

this was evident

in the political party supporting

climate change climate change being a

cyclic process

there being no established cause effect

relationship scientists working on

climate change

scientists disagreeing with climate

change and

volcanic eruptions influencing the

climate

however the misinformation that relied

on this information

is indeed difficult to get a hold of

moreover

another pattern that i noticed is the

fault in political opinion

building people need to decide their

favorite politician

to suit their opinions and ideologies

instead of forming their opinions and

their whole belief system based on their

favorite political entity

ignoring all my counter-arguments for a

second

what if the other side is correct how

big of a loss would we be at

as nihilistic as it may sound there is a

slim possibility

that everything is meaningless and what

is the worst thing that could happen

to answer that question i worked year

long with

top tier scientists to get a simulated

image of a world

where climate change is not real and we

still take efforts

i’m just kidding however if climate

change is indeed real

and we don’t do anything about it covet

19

may just be the beginning of the end

there is a real possibility

that the novel coronavirus is one of the

pathogens

ancient and unknown that are frozen in

permafrost in the glaciers of the poles

once those melt a disaster of unknown

proportions may take place

finally i would like to urge everyone

out there to be independent thinkers

think for yourselves do not believe

either side blindly

observe what is happening about you and

see what is happening in the world

around you

listen to what different scientists have

observed the improvement that we have

made

till today is just the fruit of the

efforts of a few

imagine what we as a society can

possibly achieve with a united effort

let us clean the earth and finally

realize

how polluted our living conditions had

actually become

consider this your formal invitation to

bring small changes

a small change by many is better than

big changes by a few

and this change starts with you thank

you

不幸的是,当大流行袭击

我的整个国家时,我的整个国家都陷入了封锁,

我们

不得不带薪休假来做

家务,而家务的负担

落在了我的母亲身上

,第一个月

我们俩都喜欢做自己的工作

,而且还不错 整个房子都很干净,

但是封锁被延长了

多次,随着时间的推移,我们开始

厌倦了我们的选择,

并开始减少做它们的

频率,

它仍然足够干净,我们可以

住在那里,但是房子

每次经过都变得越来越脏 一周

因为我们生活在我母亲和我的混乱中而感到沮丧

,我

开始更频繁地争吵,

变得天生

不快乐,我们一直把家务交给

彼此,

最后上个月,我祖母

提出要接待

我和蹒跚学步的弟弟一个星期,

我母亲利用了这个机会

为了摆脱我们房子里的杂乱

并回到博客零

,我在回来的时候意识到

我们房子里的不洁程度逐渐增加

我们从来没有真正意识到它变得多么肮脏,

直到我们

现在在锁定在

我房子的四堵墙内的锁定期间清理它

我大部分时间都在虚拟

世界中度过,其中大部分

是在社交媒体网站上欣赏他人的完美生活

在与一位来自肯塔基州的绅士进行了详尽的争论之后,我在一个

任何人都不应该去 youtube

评论区的地方受到了我生命中的震惊,

我被介绍给一个

我认为是一个城市神话的社会

团体,他们不相信气候

从七岁

起就教给我们气候变化的环境带来的变化

我发现很难相信

人们可以直截了当地否认科学

事实

然后少年侦探在

罗斯埃里克先生的假冒下进行秘密行动

并玩弄 各种

社交媒体平台

的算法真正了解硬币的另一面

社交媒体的运作方式是一个

人看到

他们参与的帖子类型更多,

所以我有目的地参与

那些反驳或诋毁气候

变化

的帖子 理智的人会发现

贬义要注意

绿色部分和黄色部分 免责声明,

无论它们听起来多么古怪或

夸张,这些

都不是我编造的,所以我们来这里,

第一气候变化是一个

阴谋

论 为控制议会而创建的一个政党

,随之而来的是一个历史性的故事

,并且

话语从那里加速走下坡路

,这个理论的问题

在于,人类不是

一部写得不好的电影中的一个音符角色,

仅仅因为一个有争议的人

认可某事

并不意味着事情是错的

阿道夫希特勒

在战争

期间赞同素食主义 不是暗示

素食主义是

阿道夫·希特勒提出的阴谋论

有争议的人类通常可以支持

积极的

事情 第二我们现在看到的气候变化

是一个自然的循环过程,

人类对它几乎没有影响

需要注意的事情 该

声明的第一部分实际上是

真正的

气候变化是一个循环过程,但

如果自然气候周期

是一个愉快的家庭开车

上山,那么变化是缓慢而微妙的 当前气候变化

场景是整个

过山车根据 在工业阶段之前,NASA

大气中的二氧化碳含量

低于

百万分之 280,2000 年为百万分之 370,

现在为百万分之 412

80

万年第三次

全球变暖和二氧化碳水平

只有高度

相关,没有

因果关系

有时,

如果您认为

全球变暖与

二氧化碳水平

之间的联系或相关性不如因果关系那么严重,那么您必须用事实来反驳事实。让我

提醒您,同样的类比是

适用于另一对现象

吸烟

与肺癌之间确实存在很高的相关性,但两者之间也没有

因果关系,

因此我们可以吸烟而不用

担心癌症

,就像我们正在吸烟

破坏我们的气氛一样 行星的

肺 问题是我们可以对多

对肺进行实验来

确定因果关系,

但我们只有一个行星

第四位

科学家制造了气候变化,如果你足够认真地思考

,解决这个问题是他们的头痛

这确实有道理它不像

世界

升温并使地球不

适合居住直接影响

我们任何人老实说让你

尽管缺乏任何证据

,但仍然认为这是

真的

这个论点是建立在这样一个事实的基础上,即

3% 的科学家

不同意气候变化 3

%

你如何忽略 97 位

确实

同意人类原因很重要并且

只遵循

那些否认它的 3% 的科学家的观点的科学家

看看这块蛋糕有多薄,

六号是最常见

的,人类所做的任何努力都是徒劳的,

因为只需要一次火山

爆发就可以抵消我们的努力,

而没有量化的衡量标准来衡量

人类的努力有多大帮助

遏制气候变化

如果我们

假设我们的努力

确实无效,那么这个大胆的声明自信地陈述了这

一点 可能

导致多年天气模式变化的火山本身

就是一项巨大的成就

,而火山被

少数人

的努力所抵消 ted 演讲模板

是的,有一个模板,不,它并不

僵化

错误信息

总是有一条消息

是真实的,

并诱使您相信其余的消息 这

在支持气候变化的政党中很明显

气候变化是一个

循环过程

没有确定的因果

关系 从事气候变化工作的

科学家 科学家不同意 随着气候

变化和

影响气候的火山爆发,

然而

依赖此信息的错误信息

确实很难掌握

而且我注意到的另一种模式

是政治观点建设的错误,

人们需要根据自己的观点和意识形态来决定他们

最喜欢的政治家

而不是根据他们最喜欢的政治观点来形成他们的观点

和整个信仰体系。

实体

暂时无视我所有的反论点

,如果对方是正确的

,我们将遭受多大的损失

,听起来像虚无主义一样

,一切都毫无意义的可能性很小

,可能发生的最糟糕的事情是什么

为了回答这个问题,我与顶级科学家一起工作了

一年,

以获得

气候变化不真实的世界的模拟图像,我们

仍在努力

关于它 觊觎

19

可能只是结束的开始

新型冠状病毒很有可能是

古老而未知的病原体之一

极地冰川中的永久冻土

一旦融化,

可能会发生未知比例的灾难

最后我想敦促

那里的每个人都是独立

思考者自己思考不要相信

任何一方都盲目地

观察发生在你身上的事情

看看你周围的世界正在发生

什么 听听不同科学家的

观察 我们今天所取得的进步只是

少数人努力的成果

想象我们作为一个社会

可以通过共同努力实现什么

清洁地球,终于

意识到

我们的生活条件实际上已经变得多么污染了,

考虑一下你的正式邀请,

带来一些

小的改变,许多人的小改变胜过

少数人的大改变

,这种改变从你开始,谢谢