Redefining Climate Change Denial

[Music]

while i was working on my phd

back in 2005 i had the opportunity to

pick up a guest speaker from the airport

dr steven schneider he was a lead author

on the most comprehensive report on

climate change to be written

up to that time so he gave me a little

bit of trouble for picking him up in a

single occupancy suv

i probably should have seen that one

coming i guess

and i knew he was right but i

rationalized it by telling myself

i’m just one person this is a big

systemic problem that we have to fix

but he gave a phenomenal talk it really

changed the arc of my career

up to that point i’d just been studying

earth sciences

and he convinced me that to solve

society’s most pressing problems

we have to be studying human and natural

systems as integrated parts of a whole

i’ve been working towards that ever

since

i remember the day about five years

later reading that he had abruptly

passed away

he had a pulmonary embolism on an

airplane

and i was devastated but i was also just

struck by the profound irony

that someone who dedicated his life to

climate activism

died doing one of the most fossil fuel

intensive activities any human can do

flying but that’s just how we all

thought at that point you had to fly for

research you had to fly for meetings you

had to fly for conferences

the more successful you were the more

flying you did

and it’s only recently as i’ve been

reflecting on my own career and the

amount of travel i’ve done as a

scientist

that i stopped and wondered have i been

living the life

of a climate change denier

you ever have a moment like that where

you’re just gobsmacked by this

realization that your behavior

and your beliefs are just not as well

aligned as you thought they were

well fast forward to 2015 president

obama was making climate a priority

the us was actively shaping the paris

agreement there were reasons for

by 2015 we had known everything we

needed to know

for decades and actually much longer

than that

the first paper to describe the global

warming problem was published in 1856

1856 by an american scientist

eunice foote she laid it all out all the

way back then

and certainly al gore updated and

reminded us

in gory detail in the mid 1990s

by 2015 we were swimming in oceans of

data

from meteorological stations all around

the world

we’d collected thousands of sediment

cores from lakes and ice cores from

glaciers

to allow us to reconstruct what past

climates have been like

and they were all telling us how far

outside of normal conditions we were

this is no natural cycle we’re way

outside of natural conditions

we had little gadgets we could use to

measure co2 coming out of individual

leaves on trees

as well as at the scale of entire cities

and whole continents

and all of this information was feeding

into some of the most sophisticated

computer models

ever created to help us predict what

future

climate scenarios look like

and yet despite this mountain of

information that was all pointing in the

same direction and screaming at us of

what a disaster we had created

in february of 2015 jim inhofe

brought a snowball onto the floor of the

u.s senate

as evidence that climate change was just

a hoax

he brought a snowball

this was his attempt to undermine a

century and a half of science

this was his response to the recent

observation that 2014

had been the hottest year on record well

guess what

2015 was even hotter as was 2016

in 2017 in 2018 and 2019

and 2020. they were all hotter

inhofe was the definition of a climate

change denier

at that time some called these people

skeptics i don’t think so

skeptics bring substantive arguments to

debate

inhofe and the other deniers responded

to all the overwhelming science

by just saying nah

and it worked it was enough to continue

to delay

action and we as a society

we just let that go we let that go

so let’s just briefly talk about our

current situation i’m sure

many of you know the story fossil fuels

continue to rise

this plot shows global energy

consumption from all these different

sources

over the past 200 years we’ve seen huge

increases in fossil fuels

coal oil and gas just since the year

2000

if you look around you see solar panels

going up and wind farms and you feel

like we’ve got this problem licked

i got to burst that bubble for you right

now

all global renewables are represented in

that thin

green band there renewables have not

offset fossil fuels in any way

shape or form they’ve only enabled

growth in energy consumption

i think it’s important to point out here

too that the vast majority of these

historical fossil fuel emissions were

put in the air by white people

mostly in europe and north america and

people of color

are impacted disproportionately by

climate change

all around the world so i don’t see how

we can look at this as anything other

than

a form of environmental racism whether

it was intentional

or not just what does a hotter future

look like

we’re already starting to see hints of

the severe implications to come

and we’re becoming a little bit

desensitized to it

more extreme weather more floods more

droughts

more wildfire more food and water

shortages

all of these cause political social and

economic instabilities

so we’re expecting tens to hundreds of

millions of climate refugees

by 2050.

human suffering ecosystems

failing instabilities that pose

threats to national security for which

we are precariously unprepared

according to the us military

we are in a climate emergency and i’m

using that word emergency very precisely

to mean a threat that requires immediate

action

to avoid catastrophic outcomes i know a

lot of you are probably thinking but

i’ve got five

other emergencies going on right now but

climate change is the big one because it

multiplies all of these other problems

mental health infectious disease poverty

they’re all multiplied they’re amplified

by climate change and so many of the

impacts of climate change

are irreversible

what happens from here is up to us every

bit of fossil carbon we put in the air

makes it worse and more expensive to

deal with

we’re out of wiggle room we’re out of

time for delays and half measures

the next five years are critical

we must start to dramatically reduce

fossil fuels

starting now

so this all begs the question what is a

climate change denier in the 2020s

we still have some of these bonehead

deniers that just overtly refuse to

accept facts there’s no

amount of information that’s going to

convince them

maybe it’s a defense mechanism for them

they can’t handle the truth

maybe they have a financial or political

stake in our current fossil fuel economy

all we know for sure is that they’re

wrong

and in denial of reality

most people choose to accept facts 60 to

70 percent of americans

understand climate change is happening

they’re concerned about it they believe

it will harm future generations

and they think we should be taking

action now

but even among these people these good

well-intentioned people

there are still so many passive forms of

climate change denial

take for example what i call the vip

denier

these are very important people anything

they do is so important

that the carbon pollution they produce

is justified in their opinion

this was me five years ago this is why i

thought it was okay to fly around the

world

and tell people about how bad climate

change was right

but here’s the thing we have a small

fixed and non-negotiable amount of

carbon we can put in the air

before we reach critical climate

thresholds

and the air doesn’t care who burns it

so if i burn a bunch of fossil fuels on

a flight across the country

for a two-day conference that’s fossil

fuels that someone in india can’t use

to feed their entire family for a full

year

a full year

we can all rationalize that what we do

is important

but when we have a fixed amount of

carbon we can put in the air

equity matters

there’s also the technologists denier

some of them will say i can burn as much

fossil fuels as i want the next

generation

is going to solve it number one we don’t

have that kind of time

number two that’s our kids that’s our

grandkids we’re talking about

haven’t we put enough on them already

wouldn’t we rather leave them with a

better world

rather than bigger problems to deal with

other technologists deniers will say

well there’s a big breakthrough right

around the corner it’s going to solve

all of this all these problems are just

going to go poof

yeah right anyone driving a

hydrogen-powered car

or have a carbon capture tower in your

backyard

no we’ve been talking about those

technologies

for decades and they’re still

impractical

there will be technological advances but

we are terrible

at predicting when they’re going to be

ready for use at scale

reducing emissions right now buys us

time

for those technologies to come to

fruition

there’s also the offset denier so they

think

i can burn as much fossil fuels as i

want now i’m just going to pay somebody

ten dollars to plant a tree

and hope it doesn’t burn down

now don’t get me wrong here planting

trees is great

but number one the carbon offset

accounting at the global scale

is pretty unreliable number two

more importantly we simply cannot offset

all the fossil carbon

we’re taking out of the ground by

putting trees on earth’s surface

we literally run out of viable tree

habitat pretty quickly

and third once we bring all that fossil

carbon up and put it on the surface we

have to manage it and we all know

that carbon can be locked up in a tree

one minute and go up in smoke

and be back in the air the next the only

way to keep the carbon out of the air

is to keep the fossil fuels in the

ground

so plant trees i love trees but don’t

use it as an excuse to burn a bunch more

fossil fuels

in many ways i feel like these offset

schemes are more effective at offsetting

guilt

than they are at offsetting anything to

do with our carbon

fossil fuel pollution

lastly we’ve got the helpless bystander

denier

totally accepts the science totally

can’t do anything about it

climate change is a problem that

somebody else needs to solve

in some ways this may be the worst form

of denial because it exudes inactivism

and inactivism is contagious

at this point in history if you’re just

standing around doing nothing on this

you are part of the problem

see in the 2020s it’s not just about

denying the science the much more common

problem now

is in denying that it’s an emergency

it’s about denying our own power to play

a real role in

actionable i can get it done today

solutions

so let me try to redefine what it is to

be a climate change denier in the 2020s

i think a climate change denier at this

point is anyone that has a large carbon

footprint

and is not working every day to reduce

fossil fuel use

if you’re wondering if you have a large

carbon footprint well if you drove here

today or you’re watching this on a

computer or you fly a couple times a

year you definitely have a large carbon

footprint

welcome to the club

now you can’t solve it all yourself we

have a massive global system that needs

to be fixed

but we have to work on it together

and we must work on it every day

so let’s finish up by talking about what

it means to work on it

every day so many things you can do

cost nothing vote for science

vote for clean energy vote for an

economy in which everyone pays

for what they get another thing we can

just do is just talk about it

we need to normalize talking about

climate change

talk about our concerns talk about

solutions speak up to those spreading

misinformation

you know we can only vote every couple

years an election rolls around but we

can call our representatives

every day and sometimes i do

especially the local ones that are most

likely to listen

a third thing we can do is just don’t

buy

so much stuff

right think of how much money i just

saved you

when we’re embedded in a fossil fuel

intensive

system buying less stuff saves a lot of

fossil fuel pollution

and when you have to buy stuff buy from

truly sustainable companies

don’t fall for the false promises and

half measures

if a company says they’re getting rid of

plastic bags that’s great give them a

high five

should have done it 20 years ago keep

going

you’ve only solved about one percent of

the problem

right we need the whole system to be

fossil fuel

free i’m not going to go through the

laundry list of things we can each do to

eliminate fossil fuels there are lots of

other great

ted talks and other resources out there

about climate action

this is a talk about recognizing the

passive forms

of climate change denial i’m not here to

shame you

i’m here to motivate you to become part

of the solution

every day there’s an active role

for everyone to play whether you’re a

chef or a server

a janitor a teacher a business owner a

healthcare worker

a truck driver an artist whether you’re

unemployed or retired there’s a role for

you

whatever your talents your capacities

your means there’s a role for you to

play

find it ask yourself how can i apply my

talents my power

what can i bring to bear to help solve

this problem and start today

as a climate realist

stephen schneider taught us that we had

to fix the system

and fixing the system starts with me and

you

thank you

you

[音乐]

当我

在 2005 年攻读博士学位时,我有机会

从机场接了一位特邀演讲者

steven schneider 博士,他是

当时最全面的气候变化报告的主要

作者,所以 他让我

在一辆

单人房车上接

他有点麻烦

我们必须解决的系统性问题,

但他发表了精彩的演讲,这确实

改变了我的职业生涯

直到那时我刚刚学习

地球科学

,他说服我,要解决

社会最紧迫的问题,

我们必须研究人类 和自然

系统作为一个整体的组成部分,

自从

我记得大约

五年后的那一天

,我一直在努力实现这一目标 但我也

对一个深具讽刺意味的人感到震惊

,一个毕生致力于

气候激进主义的人

死于任何人类可以做的最消耗化石燃料的活动之一,

但这正是我们

当时认为你必须飞行进行

研究的方式 你必须飞去参加会议 你

必须飞去参加

会议 你越成功 你飞行的次数就越多

停下来想知道我是否

过着

气候变化的生活否认

你曾经有过这样的时刻,

你只是被这种

意识到你的行为

和你的信仰并不

像你想象的那么一致而

惊呆了 到 2015 年,

奥巴马总统将气候问题作为优先事项,

美国正在积极制定《巴黎

协定》,有理由

到 2015 年,我们已经知道

了几十年来我们需要知道的一切,实际上很多

比第一篇描述全球

变暖问题的论文更早于 1856

年 1856 年由一位美国科学家

尤妮丝·富特 (eunice foote) 发表,她在那时将其全部展开

,当然 al gore

在 1990 年代中期

到 2015 年更新并详细提醒我们 我们在来自世界各地气象站的数据海洋中游泳

我们从湖泊中收集了数千个沉积物

核心和从冰川中收集了冰核心,

以使我们能够重建

过去的气候

,它们都告诉我们离地球有

多远 正常情况下,

这不是自然循环 我们远远

超出了自然条件

我们有一些小工具可以用来

测量树木上单个

叶子

以及整个城市

和整个大陆的二氧化碳排放量

以及所有这些 信息正在

输入一些有史以来最复杂的

计算机模型

,以帮助我们预测

未来的

气候情景

,尽管 他的海量

信息都指向

同一个方向,向我们尖叫,说我们

在 2015 年 2 月造成了一场灾难,吉姆·英霍夫(jim inhofe)

把一个雪球滚到了美国参议院的地板上,

以此证明气候变化只是

他带来的一个骗局 滚雪球

这是他试图破坏

一个半世纪的科学

这是他对最近观察到的回应,

即 2014 年是

有记录以来最热的一年

猜猜

2015 年比 2016 年更热

2017 年 2018 年和 2019 年

和 2020 年 . 他们都更热

inhofe 是当时气候变化否认者的定义,

有些人称这些人为

怀疑论者,我不认为

怀疑论者会为辩论 inhofe 带来实质性的论据,

而其他否认者

对所有压倒性的科学

的回应只是说不,

和 它奏效了,继续推迟行动就足够了

,我们作为一个社会,

我们只是放手了,我们放手了,

所以让我们简单谈谈我们

目前的情况 相信

你们中的许多人都知道这个故事 化石燃料

继续上升

这张图显示

了过去 200 年中所有这些不同来源的全球能源消耗 如果您环顾四周,我们已经看到

自 2000 年以来化石燃料煤石油和天然气的巨大增长

你看到太阳能电池

板和风力发电场,你

觉得我们已经解决了这个问题

我现在必须为你打破这个泡沫

所有全球可再生能源都代表在

那个细小的

绿色带中,可再生能源并没有

以任何方式抵消化石燃料

它们的形状或形式只会

促进能源消耗的增长,

我认为在这里

也需要指出,这些

历史化石燃料排放

中的绝大多数是由白人排放到空气中的,

主要是在欧洲和北美,

而有色人种

是 受到世界各地

气候变化的不成比例的影响

,所以我不明白

我们怎么能把它看作

是一种环境种族主义,不管

它是不是我

更热的未来是什么样子的

所有这些都会导致政治社会和

经济不稳定,

因此我们预计到 2050 年将有数千万至

数亿气候难民

人类受苦的生态系统

因不稳定而

对国家安全构成威胁,

根据我们所在的美国军方的说法,

我们对此毫无准备 气候紧急情况,我

非常准确地使用紧急情况这个词

来表示需要立即

采取行动

以避免灾难性后果的威胁

大的,因为它使

所有其他问题成倍增加

心理健康 传染病 贫困

它们都成倍增加 谎称它们会

被气候变化放大,因此气候变化的许多

影响

是不可逆转的

,从这里发生的事情取决于我们

我们在空气中排放的每一点化石碳

都会使处理变得更糟、更昂贵

我们出局了 的回旋余地 我们没有

时间延迟,

未来五年的一半措施至关重要

我们必须从现在开始大幅减少

化石燃料

所以这一切都引出了一个问题 什么是

2020 年代的气候变化否认者

我们仍然有一些 这些愚蠢的

否认者公然拒绝

接受事实 没有

多少信息可以

说服他们

也许这对他们来说是一种防御机制

他们无法处理真相

也许他们

在我们当前的化石燃料经济中拥有财务或政治利益

肯定知道他们是

错的

,在否认现实的情况下,

大多数人选择接受事实 60

% 到 70% 的美国人

了解气候变化正在发生,

他们担心我 他们认为

这会伤害子孙后代

,他们认为我们现在应该采取

行动,

但即使在这些人中,这些善意

善意的人

仍然有很多消极形式的

气候变化

否认,例如我所说的 vip

denier

这些是 非常重要的人

他们所做的任何事情都非常重要

,以至于他们产生的碳污染

在他们看来是合理的

这是五年前的我 这就是为什么我

认为可以环游

世界

并告诉人们气候变化有多糟糕

是正确的,

但是 这就是

我们在达到关键气候

阈值之前可以将少量固定

且不可协商的碳排放到空气中的东西

这个国家

为期两天的会议是化石

燃料,印度的某个人不能用它

来养活他们的整个家庭一整年

一整年

我们都可以合理化我们所做的事情

是强制的

但是当我们有固定数量的

碳时,我们可以投入空气

公平问题

还有技术专家否认

他们中的一些人会说我可以燃烧尽可能多的

化石燃料

下一代将解决我们不

没有第二个时间

,那就是我们的孩子,

我们正在谈论的孙子,我们

是否已经为他们付出了足够的努力,

难道我们宁愿让他们拥有一个

更美好的世界,

而不是与

其他技术专家否认的更大问题打交道吗? 会说

好 有一个重大突破就

在拐角处 它会解决

所有这些问题 所有这些问题

都会变得很糟糕

几十年来一直在谈论这些技术,它们仍然

不切实际

,会有技术进步,但

我们

很难预测它们何时

可以大规模使用,

减少排放权 现在为我们

争取时间让这些技术

取得成果

还有抵消丹尼尔所以他们

认为

我可以燃烧尽可能多的化石燃料

现在我只需付钱给某人

种一棵树

并希望它不会

现在烧毁不要误会我在这里

种树很好,

但第一

,全球范围内的碳抵消核算

非常不可靠第二

更重要的是,我们根本无法通过投入来抵消

我们从地下取出的所有化石碳

地球表面的树木

我们很快就耗尽了可生存的树木

栖息地

,第三,一旦我们将所有化石

碳带到地面上,我们

必须对其进行管理,我们都

知道碳可以在一分钟内被锁在树上

然后在烟雾中升起

并重新回到空气中 下一个

使碳远离空气的唯一方法

是将化石燃料保留在

地下,

所以种树我爱树,但不要

以此为借口燃烧 一堆

化石 f

在很多方面,我觉得这些抵消

计划在抵消

内疚方面

比在抵消

与我们的碳化

石燃料污染有关的任何事情方面更有效

最后我们有无助的旁观者

否认者

完全接受科学完全

无能为力

气候变化是一个

其他人需要

以某种方式解决的问题 这可能是最糟糕

的否认形式,因为它散发出不

活跃的气息,而

在历史的这一点

上,不活跃是具有传染性的

看到 2020 年代的问题,这不仅仅是

否认科学,现在更常见的

问题

是否认这是紧急情况,

这是关于否认我们自己

在可操作中发挥真正作用的能力

我今天可以完成

解决方案

所以让我 尝试重新定义什么是

2020 年代气候变化

否认者 每天开车以减少

化石燃料的使用

如果您想知道自己的

足迹是否很大

欢迎来到俱乐部,

现在你不能自己解决所有问题我们

有一个庞大的全球系统

需要修复,

但我们必须

共同努力,我们必须每天都在努力,

所以让我们最后谈谈

它的含义

每天都在做这么多你可以做的事情不

花钱 投票支持科学

投票支持清洁能源 投票支持

每个人都

为他们得到的东西付费的经济体 我们

可以做的另一件事就是谈论它

我们需要正常化谈论

气候变化

谈论我们的担忧 谈论

解决方案 直言那些散布

错误信息的人

你知道我们只能每隔几年投票

一次 选举临近但我们

可以每天给我们的代表

打电话 有时我会

特别做 y 最

有可能倾听

的当地人 我们可以做的第三件事就是不要

太多

东西 想想

当我们嵌入化石燃料

密集型

系统时我刚刚为你节省了多少钱 购买更少的东西可以节省 大量的

化石燃料污染

,当你必须从

真正可持续发展的公司购买东西时,

如果一家公司说他们正在摆脱

塑料袋,那很好,给他们一个

高五

应该有 20 年前就做到了 继续

前进

你只解决了大约 1%

的问题

对我们需要整个系统

不含化石燃料 我不

打算列出我们每个人都可以做些什么来

消除化石燃料的清单 还有很多

其他关于气候行动的精彩

TED 演讲和其他资源

这是一个关于承认

气候变化否认的被动形式的演讲 我不是来这里

羞辱你

我来这里是为了激励你

成为解决方案的一部分

每天都有

每个人都可以扮演的积极角色 无论您是

厨师还是

服务员 看门人 老师 企业主

医疗保健

工作者 卡车司机 艺术家 无论您是

失业还是退休

无论您的才华如何,您都可以发挥自己的作用 能力

你的手段 你可以扮演的角色

找到它 问问自己 我如何运用我的

才能 我的力量

我可以承担什么来帮助解决

这个问题 并从今天开始

作为气候现实主义者

斯蒂芬施耐德告诉我们,我们

必须解决 系统

和修复系统从我开始,

谢谢你