Super 2021 the future of everything depends on it

protecting planet earth is critical to

the future of

everything but if you focus on the

campaigning mantra of the green movement

you’d be forgiven for thinking that for

environmentalists the key to that future

is clinging to the past

stop hs2 ban fracking no third runways

ban plastic straws neonicotinoids and

chinese lanterns

stand with extinction rebellion and

bring london life to a halt

at first glance the green movement can

give the impression it’s all about

stopping things from happening and

returning to a simpler way of life

we call for curbs on international trade

in commodities like soya

cocoa beef and leather that drive

deforestation

and we call instead for localism and

fewer food miles

we oppose fast fashion and consumerism

and ask people to remember how to reuse

repair and recycle we draw lines on maps

that become protected areas and we

designate features within them to

preserve

even the name conservationist speaks of

a movement that’s all about

yesterday stop stop stop

and there’s no doubt about it we have to

look after our planet

better for the future of our society and

that means halting and reversing some of

the biggest trends associated with

modernity

we can’t go on living the way we have if

we want to go on living

for decades our demands on the earth

have exceeded our world’s ability to

sustain itself

we already use the equivalent of 1.7

earth’s worth of natural resources

and our use of materials is expected to

double by 2050.

so the most urgent priority for the

future of our planet is putting in place

the legal frameworks we need to halt

and reverse that train of destruction

and this was meant to be a big year for

stopping things

super 2020 the year the nations of the

world come together to strike three new

environmental agreements to secure the

future of our planet

first of all in lisbon portugal a global

oceans treaty

to protect the high seas

believe it or not there’s no

international agreement for protecting

our ocean in the area beyond national

jurisdiction

that’s 95 of our ocean completely

unprotected

[Music]

talks are intended to agree a new legal

instrument to protect areas of the ocean

from human activities for the first time

and then in kunming china there was

meant to be a new agreement

under the convention on biological

diversity to halt and reverse the

relentless decline of wildlife

that’s really been going for a century

now

these talks are intended to strike a new

more accountable and

action-focused target to halt species

decline in the next

10 years and protect 30 percent of our

land and sea for nature

all across the globe and in glasgow

scotland we were meant to agree new

climate change targets to limit global

warming

to 1.5 degrees

each of these areas is essential for

human prosperity in its own right

and crucially they’re also completely

interdependent

we’ll never solve climate change if we

continue to trawl up the blue carbon

locked in our seabed

or burn our forests and peatlands we’ll

never bring

life back to our terrestrial fresh water

and marine ecosystems

unless we curb co2 emissions and halt

climate change

so this was meant to be the year when

new deals were reached

to stop over exploitation of our ocean

to stop the destruction of habitats and

species to stop emissions of greenhouse

gases from causing

runaway climate change

so far then not much to break the

caricature of us environmentalists with

our hair

shirts and stop signs but take a closer

look

and you find that the political social

and scientific efforts

needed to put the brakes on

environmental catastrophe is a rocket

boost for progress

the first and most obvious way is that

technology can be a cure as well as a

cause of environmental harm

tackling those environmental risks has

been a powerful driver of innovation

that will bring

far wider benefits in response to

climate change policy trillions of

pounds of investment have poured into

clean energy innovation

renewable energy continues to become

cheaper and more readily available at

every scale

and this environmental innovation could

have amazing social benefits for the

billion people across the globe

without access to electricity countries

in the most

energy-hungry places on earth like

sub-saharan africa and the caribbean

could make the most of wind and solar to

create a much more accessible

and egalitarian energy system that

breaks people’s reliance

on the government and on a centralized

grid we’re living

through a green industrial revolution

but more exciting than technological

change is the social and political

innovation being born out of

environmental need

environmental thinking is reshaping

political economics to forge

ever more complex closer international

deals that delve deeper into national

sovereignty

and deeper into individual life than

ever before

and to get that right the international

political system needs to change

to puncture the political assumptions

that have developed over centuries and

have become ingrained in the idea of the

post-war nation-state

with almost exclusive say and

sovereignty over what happens within its

borders

it’s a simple but central insight of

environmental politics that the natural

world knows no borders

so nor must environmental action

a ton of carbon is a ton of carbon

wherever on earth it’s emitted

air and water pollution don’t respect

national boundaries and birds

no no borders

probably the most powerful illustration

of this interdependence is the fact that

i’m recording this video on my computer

right now

international society has been brought

to its knees by an

anthropogenic environmental disaster a

pandemic that has its roots

in our dysfunctional relationship with

nature

this terrible year of death lockdown and

losses can be attributed in part

to humanity’s over-exploitation of our

natural world

the same activities that drive

environmental destruction bring wildlife

livestock people and pathogens into

closer contact

making parts of our planet into petri

dishes for disease

we know that industrial farming the

illegal wildlife trade and deforestation

all multiply the chances that a calamity

like this will happen and happen again

we also know that risks like zoonotic

disease are just one player

in a whole cast of anthropogenic

environmental villains waiting in the

wings

earlier this year the world economic

forum reported that the top

five risks to the global economy now are

all environmental challenges

greenhouse gas emissions agricultural

intensification and overfishing are all

gradually stacking the odds against us

so to succeed those global deals i

mentioned will have to reach into the

letter of the law

and the fabric of society in very novel

ways

of course there have been important

international agreements in the past

but the ubiquity of action needed to

comply with those three treaties on the

table is like nothing humanity has

ever accomplished before each of the

three international conventions has

close to 200 countries signed up

of the globe and perhaps

the most extraordinary thing is this

most of the benefits that this action

will be

bring won’t be enjoyed just by people

we’ve never met

on the other side of the globe that

they’ll they’ll be enjoyed by people who

haven’t even been

born yet this is a concept of

intergenerational justice that stretches

the conventional economic and social

assumption that people care mostly for

themselves

plenty for their immediate kids and kin

but much less

for unknown people in an unknown future

this idea of equity between generations

is developing as a rule of international

law building on the idea of sustainable

development

first set out in the 1980s development

which meets the needs of the current

generation

without compromising the ability of

future generations to meet their own

needs

that concept might sound like common

sense

but to deliver it is a radical

proposition it means

overcoming short-term industry in

politics which has traditionally been

governed by electoral cycles that last

just a handful of years

groundbreaking environmental legislation

like the uk climate change act of 2008

set legally binding long-term targets to

eliminate greenhouse gas emissions by

2050 with milestones along the way

forcing politicians to think further

than the next election

and now under pressure for environmental

campaigners

our government’s considering setting

similar long-term legally binding

targets for air water waste and wildlife

will be legally obliged to curb our

consumption stay

to benefit future generations

and these legal principles are becoming

embedded in international and national

law

appearing in multilateral agreements in

the eu

a key and now in national statute too

in stopping ourselves from doing harm

today we’re making progress in political

considerations beyond borders and

between generations that could improve

the way we cooperate

and work together in areas far beyond

climate change

and similar changes are taking place in

the way we structure our money

and markets and measure our success

that assumption that temporal distance

between people leads

to inversely inverse proportion about

how much they care

is embedded in conventional economic

thought

in other words current generations will

value present consumption

over the need to save for future

generations

but modern environmental economics is

starting to revise that thinking

lord stern’s review of the economics of

climate change was groundbreaking

in assigning a low discount rate

reducing the weighting the economic

calculations give to present value over

future value

and now the work of the review of the

economics of biodiversity could play the

same role

in revolutionizing the way we think

about long-term investment

in nature these approaches

are also being reflected regularly on on

the ground applications like

customers increasing willingness to pay

higher energy bills or water bills today

to avoid future environmental harm

and these changes are leading to further

innovations that will have positive

effects

well beyond the environmental field

one of the best ways we have to reduce

environmental harm

is to structure markets better to

account for their costs

internalizing environmental damage in

the price of products

this will have the effect of rebalancing

injustices that have been taking place

for hundreds of years for far too long

pollution has been treated as free a

chemical company that

dumps effluent in a river can take its

products to market and make a profit

without bearing

any of the costs of disposal or the harm

that might be caused to people and

wildlife downstream

but on the other hand a farmer who goes

above and beyond the rules to manage his

farm to sequester extra carbon or

provide habitat for wildlife

is rarely rewarded for the extra

benefits she might provide

now though we’re getting better at

structuring markets to rebalance the

system

emerging principles of polluter pays and

the providers is

paid are being realized in real law

policies like agri-environment schemes

that pay farmers for public benefit

but pollution taxes like the landfill

levy the plastic bag tax carbon pricing

and extended producer

responsibility for packaging are all

helping to reshape markets

to reward those who provide public good

and ensure on the other hand

harm is properly accounted for

pricing that damage into the cost of

products moves the invisible hand so

that markets

guide consumers toward more ethical

choices

they make the nature-based choice the

natural choice

and the need to do that on a more

systemic basis is helping to drive new

ways

thinking about the way we measure our

success as a society

it’s been obvious for a while now that

gross domestic products gdp is a

pretty narrow way to account for how

well we’re doing

and bhutan famously led the world with

its shift to measuring gross domestic

happiness

this has since inspired well-being

indices around the globe

most notably in new zealand’s well-being

budget last year

and environmental thinking is helping to

catalyze those changes

in traditional gdp measures burning oil

and gas

chopping down pristine forests or mining

the untouched deep seabed

all add to our score in reality of

course those

apparent profits are simply borrowing

from the future storing up environmental

costs

and nature is a loan shock borrow too

much for too long

an interest rate will be repaid high in

fire floods and lost livelihoods

new measures of environmental success

look instead to the value of ecosystem

recovery to the health of environmental

assets and to people’s equitable access

to a healthy environment

as a way of accounting for unnatural

riches

and these changes aren’t just

environmentally beneficial they’re

socially progressive

helping to shift us away from the cold

capitalism of consumerism

toward a fairer model that can help

ensure people thrive along with our

natural world

for me tackling environmental injustice

is the mission of our generation

it’s a scandal even in a rich country

like the uk

40 000 people die prematurely each year

from air pollution

the people’s chance of access to a

healthy natural environment is skewed by

race and social class

that excessive consumption today could

lead to a suffering for billions of

people in future generations who can’t

speak up for themselves

rebalancing our relationship with nature

will help to rebalance these social

injustices

and to do so we’ll need to develop new

ways of structuring multilateral

multi-generational political agreements

and new ways of organizing our money and

our markets

so what comes next the brilliant

birdlife international

has just launched a campaign to make a

healthy natural environment

a human right i think the rights-based

approach

to ensuring that everyone can drink

clean water breathe pure air and live in

a thriving natural environment

has great promise it also has a pleasing

symmetry

as innovative rights-based law that can

have its roots in older ways of thinking

that have

even attributed rights to nature itself

but whatever happens next year will be a

turning point

coronavirus has thoroughly put paid to

super 2020

instead we’ve had yet more reminders of

why these talks are so vital

2020 is on course to be the hottest year

for the earth’s surface since reliable

records began in the mid-1800s

david attenborough brought us extinction

the facts a warning of the sixth mass

extinction with a million

of the eight million species on earth at

risk of disappearing

and coronavirus has shown us that

there’s a direct line of sight between

the consumption choices we make here at

home

and the health of ecosystems in the

economy around the globe

these problems are like nothing humanity

has faced before

but nor has any generation stood so

ready to face the challenge

with the technical economic and

political innovation that’s racing

forward with our efforts to avert

environmental disaster the talks next

year are crucial

they’ll be difficult but there can also

be

a springboard for improvements in our

way of life that go far beyond

environmental prosperity

we’ve missed super 2020 so let’s make it

a spectacular 2021. the future of

everything

depends on it

保护地球

对一切的未来

都至关重要,但如果你专注于

绿色运动的竞选口号,

你会认为对

环保主义者来说,未来的关键

是坚持过去,这是可以

原谅的 塑料吸管 新烟碱类和

中国灯笼

与灭绝叛乱站在一起

乍一看让伦敦的生活陷入停顿 绿色运动

给人的印象是一切都是

为了阻止事情发生并回归更简单的生活方式

我们呼吁限制国际

贸易 大豆

可可牛肉和皮革等商品导致森林

砍伐 我们呼吁地方主义和

减少食物里程

我们反对快时尚和消费主义

并要求人们记住如何重复利用

维修和回收 我们在

成为保护区的地图上画线 我们

指定特征 在他们内部,以

保护

即使是保护主义者的名字也谈到了

一场运动

昨天 停止 停止

停止 毫无疑问,我们必须更好地

照顾我们的星球

,以实现我们社会的未来,

这意味着停止和扭转

与现代性相关的一些最大趋势,

如果我们不能继续以我们的方式生活

我们想继续生活

几十年 我们对地球的需求

已经超出了我们世界维持自身的能力

我们已经使用了相当于

地球价值 1.7 的自然资源

,预计到 2050 年我们的材料使用量将

翻一番。

所以当务之急 因为

我们星球的未来正在建立

我们需要的法律框架来制止

和扭转这一系列破坏

,这本应是阻止一切的重要一年

2020

世界各国团结起来打击三个新的

保护地球未来的环境协议

首先在里斯本 葡萄牙 保护公海的全球

海洋条约

信不信由你 没有

国际 agr

在国家管辖范围以外的区域保护我们的海洋

95 个海洋完全

不受保护

[音乐]

会谈旨在达成一项新的法律

文书,首次保护海洋区域

免受人类活动的影响

,然后在中国昆明有

旨在成为

《生物多样性公约》下的一项新协议,

以制止和扭转

已经持续了一个世纪的野生动物的无情衰退,

这些会谈旨在达成一个新的

更负责任和以

行动为重点的目标,以阻止物种

衰退 未来

10 年,为全球和苏格兰格拉斯哥的大自然保护 30% 的

陆地和海洋,

我们本应同意新的

气候变化目标,将全球

变暖

限制在 1.5 度

以内,这些领域中的每一个对于

人类繁荣都至关重要 正确

且至关重要的是,它们也是完全

相互依存的,

如果我们继续拖网,我们永远无法解决气候变化问题

rbon

被锁在我们的海床

或烧毁我们的森林和泥炭地,除非我们遏制二氧化碳排放并阻止气候变化,否则我们

永远不会

让我们的陆地淡水

和海洋生态系统恢复生机,

因此今年应该

是达成新协议

停止的一年 过度开发我们的海洋

以阻止对栖息地和物种的破坏

以阻止温室

气体的排放导致

失控的气候变化

到目前为止并没有太多可以

我们的头发

衬衫和停车标志打破我们环保主义者的漫画但仔细

看看你 发现制止环境灾难所需的政治社会

和科学努力

是进步的火箭

推动力

第一个也是最明显的方式是,

技术可以成为治疗方法,也可以

成为环境损害的原因

解决这些环境风险

一直是 创新的强大驱动力

,将为

应对

气候变化政策带来更广泛的

利益 投资已涌入

清洁能源创新

可再生能源

在各个规模上都变得更便宜、更容易获得,

而这种环境创新可以

全球十亿人带来

惊人的社会效益 像

撒哈拉以南非洲和加勒比地区一样,

可以充分利用风能和太阳能来

创造一个更容易获得

和更平等的能源系统,

打破人们

对政府和集中式

电网的依赖,我们正在

经历一场绿色工业革命,

但更令人兴奋 与技术

变革相比,社会和政治

创新是从

环境需求

中诞生的

政治 l 系统需要改变

以打破

几个世纪以来发展起来的政治假设,这些假设已经

在战后民族国家的观念中根深蒂固,

对其境内发生的事情几乎具有排他性的发言权和主权,

这是对环境的简单但核心的见解

政治自然

世界不分国界

,环保行动也不应该

如此 是

我现在在我的电脑上录制这段视频的事实

国际社会已经

人为环境灾难而陷入瘫痪 一场

流行病的根源

在于我们与自然的功能失调的关系

这个可怕的死亡封锁和

损失之年可能是 部分归因于

人类对

自然世界

的过度开发 导致

环境破坏的联系使野生动物

牲畜和病原体

更紧密地接触

使我们星球的某些部分变成

了疾病的培养皿

我们知道工业化养殖、

非法野生动物贸易和森林砍伐

都增加了此类

灾难发生并再次发生的机会

我们 也知道人畜共患

病等风险只是

众多人为环境恶棍中的一员

今年早些时候世界经济

论坛报告称,

目前全球经济面临的前五名风险

都是环境挑战

温室气体排放 农业

集约化 过度捕捞正在

逐渐对我们不利,

因此要成功我提到的那些全球交易,

必须

以非常新颖的方式触及法律条文和社会结构

,当然过去也有重要的

国际协议,

但 需要遵守的无处不在的行动

将这三项条约

摆在桌面上就像人类

在这

三项国际公约中的每一项都在全球有

近 200 个国家签署

之前所做的任何

事情一样,也许最不寻常的事情

是这一行动

带来的大部分利益赢得 不只是

我们从未

在地球另一端见过面的

人享受他们,他们会被

甚至

尚未出生的人享受这是一个

跨代公平的概念,延伸

了传统的经济 和社会

假设,人们主要

关心自己的直系子女和亲属,

但更不

关心未知未来的未知人

这种世代间公平的理念

正在发展为一项国际法规则,

建立在可持续发展理念的

基础

上 1980 年代的发展

,既满足当代人的需求,

又不损害

后代人满足他们的能力 你自己

需要

这个概念听起来像是

常识,

但要实现它是一个激进的

主张,它意味着要

克服政治上的短期行业,

这种行业传统上

受选举周期支配,选举周期

只持续了几年,

开创性的环境立法,

如英国气候变化 2008 年法案

设定了到 2050 年消除温室气体排放的具有法律约束力的长期目标,

沿途具有里程碑意义,

迫使政界人士

在下次选举之前考虑得更远

,现在环保活动人士面临压力,

我们的政府正在考虑制定

类似的具有法律约束力的长期

目标 空气、水的浪费和野生动物

将在法律上有义务限制我们的

消费,

以造福后代

,这些法律原则正在

融入国际和国家

法律

中,出现在欧盟的多边协议中,

是阻止我们自己这样做的关键,现在也在国家法规中

今天我们正在制造的伤害 在

超越国界和

代际之间的政治考虑方面取得进展,这可以

改善我们

在气候变化之外的领域中的合作和合作

方式,我们构建货币

和市场的方式以及衡量我们成功

的方式正在发生类似的变化

人们导致

他们关心

的程度与传统经济

思想成反比

,换句话说,当代人会

重视目前的消费,而

不是为后代储蓄的需要,

但现代环境经济学

开始修正

斯特恩勋爵对经济学的看法

气候变化的研究

在分配低贴现率方面是开创性的,

降低了经济

计算对现值相对于

未来价值的加权

,现在

生物多样性经济学审查的工作可以

在彻底改变我们长期思考的方式方面发挥同样的作用。

定期投资

在自然界中,这些方法

也定期反映

在地面应用中,例如

客户现在越来越愿意支付

更高的能源账单或水费

以避免未来的环境损害

,这些变化正在导致进一步的

创新,这些创新将产生

远远超出环境领域的积极影响

我们必须减少环境损害的最佳方法之一

是更好地构建市场,以更好地

考虑其成本,

将环境损害内

化到产品价格中,

这将产生重新平衡

数百年来长期存在的不公正现象的效果

污染已被视为免费

将污水倾倒在河流中的化学公司可以将其

产品推向市场并获利,

而无需承担

任何处置成本或

可能对下游人和野生动物造成的伤害,

但另一方面 一个

超越规则来管理他的

农场的农民 尽管我们在构建市场以重新平衡系统方面做得越来越好,但

为野生动物提供额外的碳或为野生动物提供栖息地

很少会因为

她现在可能提供

的额外利益而得到回报。

农业环境

计划向农民支付公共利益,

但污染税如垃圾填埋场

征收塑料袋税碳定价

和扩大生产者

对包装的责任都

有助于重塑市场

以奖励提供公共产品的人

,另一方面确保

伤害是 正确

考虑定价 对产品成本的损害

会移动无形的手,

以便市场

引导消费者做出更合乎道德的

选择

他们使基于自然的选择成为

自然选择

,并且需要在更

系统的基础上这样做有助于推动新的

思考我们衡量我们作为一个社会成功的方式的方式,

这对 aw 来说是显而易见的 虽然现在

国内生产总值 gdp 是一种

非常狭隘的方法来

解释我们的表现,

而且

不丹以衡量国内幸福总值而闻名于世,

这已经激发

了全球各地的幸福指数,

尤其是在新的 新西兰去年的福利

预算

和环境思维正在帮助

催化

传统 GDP 措施的这些变化 燃烧石油

和天然气

砍伐原始森林或

开采未开发的深海海底

所有这些都增加了我们的分数,

当然这些

表面上的利润只是

从 未来储存环境

成本

和自然是一种贷款冲击 借贷太多

太久 利率将在

火灾 洪水和失去生计的情况下得到高额偿还

环境成功的新措施

关注生态系统

恢复对环境资产健康的

价值 以及人们公平

获得健康环境

的一种方式,以解释非自然

ri ches

和这些变化不仅对

环境有益,而且对

社会进步,

有助于将我们从冰冷

的消费主义资本主义

转向更公平的模式,这有助于

确保人们与我们的自然世界一起茁壮成长,

对我来说,解决环境不公

是我们的使命 我们这一代

,即使在像英国这样的富裕国家,这也是一个丑闻,

每年有 40 000 人

因空气

污染而过早死亡 人们获得

健康自然环境的机会受到

种族和社会阶层的影响

,今天的过度消费可能

导致痛苦 数十亿

无法

为自己说话的子孙后代

重新平衡我们与自然的关系

将有助于重新平衡这些社会

不公正现象

,为此我们需要开发新的

方式来构建多边

多代政治协议

和新的方式 组织我们的资金和

我们的市场,

所以接下来会发生什么 辉煌的

国际鸟类

刚刚发起了一项使

健康的自然环境

成为人权的运动 我认为以权利为基础的

方法

可以确保每个人都能喝上

干净的水呼吸纯净的空气并生活

在繁荣的自然环境中

,它还具有令人愉悦的

对称性,

因为它具有创新性 基于权利的法律

可以根植于更古老的思维方式,这些思维方式

甚至将权利归于自然本身,

但无论明年发生什么都将是一个

转折点,

冠状病毒已经彻底支付给

2020 年,

而不是我们有更多关于

为什么的提醒 这些谈话是如此重要

2020 年将成为地球表面最热的一年

,因为可靠的

记录始于 1800 年代中期

大卫·阿滕伯勒(david attenborough)给我们带来了

灭绝 事实 发出了第六次大规模灭绝的警告,

800 万种物种中有 100 万种在 地球

面临消失的风险,

而冠状病毒向我们表明

我们在这里做出的消费选择之间存在直接的视线

家庭

和全球经济中生态系统的健康

这些问题是人类

以前从未面临过的,

但也没有任何一代人如此

准备好

面对技术经济和

政治创新所带来的挑战,而这些创新

正在我们努力避免

环境灾难 明年的会谈

至关重要,

它们会很困难,但也可能

是改善我们

生活方式的跳板,远远超出

我们错过的超级 2020 年的环境繁荣,所以让我们让它

成为壮观的 2021 年。一切的未来

取决于 在上面