The hidden power of companies to change the game on climate

[Music]

i’m going to talk about

what i’m calling the hidden power of

companies to change the game on climate

you heard from hal and john and i would

agree with what they said about what

what’s needed it’s a whole bunch of

things i’ll get more into that

um i do have what may be a somewhat

unusual perspective so i’m going to

start with a little background on me

priya just gave some of it so i’ll rush

through this so as she said i started my

career as a professor in computer

science at mit

i moved out west in the mid 90s i worked

at digital

in their research labs on computer

hardware and software

then i moved to akamai where i was chief

architect and then cto where i began to

learn a lot about the business side not

just the

technology side of things and then about

15 years ago i

started to freak out about climate and

this was me

all too often at 3 a.m in the morning

when i couldn’t sleep

i wasn’t worrying about or stewing about

you know some hard technical problem or

people problem at work or occasionally

it was kids who couldn’t sleep or

whatever but

this was me thinking about climate

change and what it meant for my future

and my kids future and everyone’s future

and i was putting solar in my house i

bought a prius which was the pinnacle of

clean cars back then

but it was clear that much more needed

to happen than i could do as an

individual in my own life

and that i i decided to change careers

to see if i could find a way to

contribute not just in my personal life

but professionally

on climate i was lucky enough in 2006 to

land a job at google

with the charter to figure out what they

were going to do on climate which was an

incredible

opportunity they took a big risk on me

and and vice versa and i led climate and

clean energy work at google for about

six years

and then i moved to facebook in a

similar role for about six years

and i had the good fortune at both

companies to dip my toes into

a number of the things that are needed

to solve the climate crisis

including research and development

venture investing to fund early stage

queen tech startups project finance

where over time

google starting when i was there but

much more since

they provided billions of dollars in

debt and equity to finance clean energy

projects

using our purchasing power to move

markets

and then collaborating through industry

groups like the renewable energy buyers

alliance re 100 and others to use our

collective purchasing power to move

markets at a much much

bigger scale and i’m really proud of

what i achieved at google on facebook

and

what the sustainability teams at those

companies and many others i’ve worked

with continued to do

and yet i’m still freaking out about

climate

three years ago i was coming to a

difficult realization

that for all the great things that

companies like google and facebook and

many others

not just tech companies are doing we’re

not moving fast enough on climate i mean

i knew that but

you know three years ago as i think

about what you know what do i do next

what does facebook do next what should i

do next

it was really beginning to hit home and

this year it’s even more real this is a

picture my wife took

about a month ago in san francisco

that’s where i live this is what the

skies look like in the middle of the day

in early september

because of smoke from the wildfires we

found out here

and we’re in the midst of an

unprecedented wildfire season in the

western u.s

in unprecedented hurricane season along

the east coast and the gulf coast we’ve

seen many other natural disasters around

the world

in part fueled by climate change and

it’s only going to get worse as as

temperatures

rise so like many of you my roots are in

technology

i started working in technology i

switched at google and facebook to

facilitating and

and scaling technological solutions to

climate change

and we do need new technology to solve

this problem and john doerr made this

point we don’t have all the solutions we

need

he said he thinks we’ve got the

technologies today to get about 70 or 80

percent of the way there

i don’t know what the exact number is

there i think 70 to 80

is probably a good guess we are not

deploying that technology fast enough

and we do need new technology to solve

some hard to decarbonize sectors and to

make the ones we do know how to

decarbonize make that easier cheaper

faster and so on

and we do need companies to step up and

read voluntarily as google

facebook hundreds of others now have

been doing

but what i began to understand several

years ago as i step back and thought

about

where i wanted to go and where facebook

needed to go and where the world needed

to go i really understood that

technological innovation and companies

leading voluntarily in kind of natural

market forces

it wasn’t enough we were winning we are

winning but we’re winning too slowly and

with climate

winning slowly is the same as losing the

ipcc 1.5 degree report from two years

ago

lays out the likely consequences of

warming of two

three or four degrees c and it’s

probably

pretty horrific we know there are

tipping points though we don’t know

precisely where they are which makes the

risk of

kind of not doing not working faster

the uncertainty is high and we know we

have a carbon budget which we are

rapidly blowing

through as we kind of hope for some

solution in the future that will just

suck all that carbon back

out we need to move quickly on climate

really quickly as hal

and john said we need to cut emissions

in half by 2030 and to net zero by 2050

and i really like to focus on that 20 30

number

because 2050 is vital but if we don’t

cut emissions in half or very close to

it by 2030

we’re in deep deep trouble and that’s

what we should be focused on which means

we need to be moving

now so we can create a much cleaner

brighter future but it’s going to take

some work

and as john said and i’ve heard how

harvey say this many times

it’s all about speed and scale it’s

about moving fast and doing it at

enormous scale companies can play a key

role

not just tech companies to be clear

that’s the sector i’ve been in

for my whole life but companies in all

sectors and especially big companies

but they need to do more than they have

been doing all of us

need to help them do it so this coming

to this realization is why in 2018

i decided to leave facebook and earlier

this year i founded a non-profit

climate voice to encourage companies to

step up to the leadership

we need from them in the coming decade

not just what they’ve been doing for the

last decade not just what they

they’re willing to do and find

relatively easy

but what we need them to do

and i said it’s not just technology it’s

not just companies voluntarily cleaning

up their own operations

we need much more than that to solve the

climate crisis

so i like to think of it as kind of like

improv it’s yes and

so we need basic science we need tech

innovation

we need finance lots of money is going

to have to move

what we wanted to do and we’ve seen that

this year with with the various recovery

or stimulus or

or whatever you want to call the the

government

uh uh expenditures um

vast amounts of money but we need to

spend it in a way

that actually drives the solutions we

need not just builds more of the stuff

we’ve been doing

these are all needed to get the massive

deployment

that we need to get clean energy

everywhere to get queen transportation

clean buildings to clean up industry and

so on

and we need behavior change and

voluntary action by individuals

and probably culture change too to make

some of this happen

when most people think about what

companies can do to help with climate

change

it’s these kinds of things innovating

cleaning up their own operations using

their market powers major purchasers to

drive scale and drive down costs

investing in r d

in startups and huge clean energy

projects that’s most of what i and my

colleagues did at google and facebook

and what people have been doing at

hundreds of other companies that are

beginning to really

act on climate but that alone isn’t

enough

to move at the speed and scale required

as hal

said we need public policy smart policy

can underpin

and turbocharge all these other things

it can reduce risk

it can drive much faster investment

innovation and deployment

and one really important point that i

think a lot of people certainly in the

the research world don’t understand i

didn’t until

you know maybe a few years ago

deployment drives

cost reduction because deployment

enables

innovation not of the kind that happens

in the lab necessarily

but the kind that happens as you learn

by doing and as you have the money to

invest in

in improving processes and that is a big

part of what has driven the massive

reduction in costs

in wind and solar in the last number of

years even in batteries which aren’t

cheap enough but they have come down an

enormous amount

but sadly emissions are still rising

maybe not this year with the pandemic

but the overall trend is nowhere close

to where it needs to be and even in the

places where emissions are beginning to

drop

they’re not dropping fast enough as john

doerr said

emissions need to drop on the order of

eight to ten percent a year for the next

decade and then continue that

after that and the reason emissions

aren’t dropping

as fast as they need to is largely

because we don’t have strong enough

policies in place

innovation is happening maybe not at the

pace we need to

deployment is happening definitely not

at the pace we need it to

behavior changes happening nowhere near

fast enough and honestly i think

you know people i don’t believe people

will just change their behavior and

that’ll solve this problem we need

everything and this is absolutely true

in the us

we don’t have strong enough policies in

place it’s also true

in almost all other countries we are

seeing

encouraging signs in some countries in

the eu with the european green deal i

think that’s incredibly encouraging

and in some states in the u.s but we

need to move much faster

everywhere so why don’t we have the

public policies we need and this is

really where i want to focus because i

think how harvey is absolutely right

and i think cal and john are both right

but we need public policy the question

is

why don’t we and here

it’s a little uncomfortable maybe to

talk about this it begins to sound

political

but public policy is about power and

influence

and the dominant business voice on

climate and energy policy today

comes from the fossil fuel industry and

by and large certainly for the last 40

years

they have been fans of going slowly or

not at all

on climate action they’ve promulgated

lots of misinformation to try to

confuse things and make it harder to

pass real climate

policies they want to preserve the

status quo this is beginning to change

with a few of the fossil fuel companies

but most of them are still working

pretty hard to preserve the status quo

and they are really powerful and have

been incredibly successful at stop

meeting progress on climate

now for decades to make this a little

clearer

studies have shown that the fossil fuel

industry in the last

well from 2000 2016 outspent pro climate

advocates

by a factor of 10 in the u.s and we’re

not talking small amounts of money

according to the studies the fossil fuel

industry in that time period spent about

2 billion that’s billion with a b

lobbying on climate almost all of that

to

stop or weaken or delay

useful climate policies and there are

many forms of influence in politics it’s

not just about money spent on lobbying

there are campaign contributions there

are

other ways occurring favor with

politicians and making it clear to them

that they should vote the way you want

because otherwise you can

maybe get them booted out of their seat

but we’ve got the fossil fuel interests

outspending pro-climate advocates 10 to

1 and doing

lots of other things to influence the

conversation

while most other companies are sitting

on the side

so imagine instead a time in the near

future where the influence of the fossil

fuel companies is balanced by other

powerful forces where this is a fair

fight

where that lonely pawn is not just a few

environmental groups actually lots of

environmental groups

and millions of young people around the

world and

and not so young people fighting for

this and people voting but it’s not

enough to counter what the fossil fuel

companies are doing

who could actually get off the sidelines

and make this a fair fight

most companies aren’t invested in the

fossil fuel economy

and many of them are innovating on

climate solutions many of them are

cleaning up their own operations and

their supply chains they’ve been leading

on climate

and that includes tech healthcare

hospitality

biotech consumer goods many other

sectors

they all have influence but most choose

not to use it

or to use it very rarely and we need

them to get off the sidelines in this

chess game

and help counter the powerful forces

that are dragging us

in the wrong direction that means being

strong consistent advocates for policies

that ensure we decarbonize

rapidly across the entire economy

more broadly it means being all in on

climate in

everything they do across their

operations their supply chain

their products and especially their

advocacy for public policy

they should be asking for everything

they do not just what’s the impact on

the financial bottom line but what’s the

impact on our collective climate bottom

line

they’re not asking that question today

the fossil fuel companies to be clear

all in

have been all in now for decades mostly

on the wrong side of the climate issue

though as i said we have seen some

positive signs from some of them

including bp and shell

you might be wondering why all these

other companies that have been good on

climate they’ve been leading why they

aren’t speaking up in favor of bold

action on climate

and the short answer is they’re afraid

they see risk and honestly the risk is

real

climate has been so politicized i think

very intentionally

especially in the us there is real risk

of political backlash

if a company takes a strong stand on

climate policies

and over the last few decades as a

result many companies have decided they

should be apolitical

unless a policy issue directly affects

them actually not just on climate but on

many issues companies have decided

politics is not for them unless they

really need to be in there

so they stay silent and they like to

think of that as neutrality

they say they should stay out of climate

politics because

they’re not an energy company or a

transportation company or construction

company so most climate policies don’t

affect them directly in the near term

and they say that they want them to

focus on where they can do the most good

to use their superpower in their

operations their products their supply

chain

we absolutely want them to use their

superpowers but it’s not enough and i

think that’s been clear from the last 10

or 20 years as companies have been using

their superpowers

emissions is still being owned up given

the extreme imbalance of power in the

climate policy debates

their silence is really complicity

with the powerful forces working

desperately to maintain the status quo

companies especially big companies have

a lot of influence

we need them to use it for the

collective good not just for their own

benefit

this is their hidden power they have

influence we need them to take it out of

hiding they all have it

they choose mostly not to use it we need

them to step up and use it

for our collective future so you might

be thinking gee could this work you know

how do we make companies do this we have

seen situations before in

in the us and i think in other places

but i’m most familiar with what’s

happened in the us where companies were

motivated to speak up on public policy

even when it didn’t directly affect

their own operations and their bottom

line

and one recent and really inspiring

example comes from the lgbt rights

movement

a decade ago there were hundreds of

companies with progressive

internal policies promoting equality for

lgbt employees

but the companies were mostly silent in

debates on public policy around that

in the u.s that changed

and changed over two or three years and

it changed in large part because

employees and students sent a very clear

signal to companies

that it was time for them to speak up so

what did employees do

they organized internally they spoke out

in all hands meetings with executives on

internal messaging boards

in direct conversations with executives

they coordinated with outside groups

the outside groups threatened to make a

public stink about the companies being

complicit through their silence if they

didn’t start to speak up

and the result was amazing companies

spoke up on marriage equality at the

state and then federal level

they spoke up on the religious freedom

restoration act in indiana

and got it repealed they spoke up on the

bathroom bill

in north carolina and got it repealed

and many other state policies other

religious freedom acts other bathroom

bills in other states

and they helped change the outcomes and

they spoke up

because for them lgbt rights went from

being an issue that didn’t matter to the

bottom line

to one that did because continuing to be

silent could affect recruiting

and retention the result was companies

went from

being bystanders we don’t discriminate

to what an anti-bullying literature

people call

upstanders we advocate for equality and

against discrimination everywhere

we actively intervene to change the

system not just being good people

ourselves and we’ve seen a similar

dynamic this year as companies have

moved from being

not racist to trying to figure out how

to be actively anti-racist

in the face of massive protests against

racial equality and oppression

so this is why we started climate voice

earlier this year

companies care about their key

stakeholders their customers their

investors

and especially their employees we’re

mobilizing the workforce to commit

convince companies that now is the time

to speak up

because workers have influence and when

we speak up

especially together we have power

we need companies to make the same

transition on climate from we don’t

pollute

to being actively anti-pollution that

they’ve made on other issues

and to be strong consistent advocates

for public policy on climate

everywhere they operate together we can

make that happen

it’s beginning to work earlier this

spring

in virginia the virginia clean economy

act was signed into law

clean energy companies support it no

surprise there but so did many companies

not in the energy sector some of them

listed here where this law had little or

no impact on their own operations and

bottom line

it’s part of a state-level trend to move

aggressively toward meeting carbon

reduction goals

in the u.s this is the first southern

state with a law like this

and it was our first policy victory it’s

one example of quite a few where we’re

starting to see more companies getting

off the sidelines

and speaking up in favor of climate

policy and it’s making a real difference

i believe this can be a game changer

this can be

one thing that can really start to tip

the balance in getting the kinds of

policies we need

to drive things at the speed and scale

that are needed

so one really important point you might

be thinking well i live in virginia or i

live in

paris or i live wherever why do i care

about policy

halfway around the world it’s not just

people in virginia who should be raising

their voice about a bill in virginia or

in paris about policies in france or the

eu

we need climate action and climate

policy everywhere

it’s not going to be the same everywhere

but we need it everywhere

climate voice can give your voice power

everywhere

because let’s say i worked at google if

you’re a google employee

anywhere in the world you can motivate

google to speak up in north carolina

or anywhere else they operate similarly

if you’re a student

anywhere and google’s interested in

hiring you you can motivate google to

speak up

anywhere they operate so regardless of

where you are

if a company you work for or interested

in working for is too quiet on policies

anywhere it operates you can help change

that

the key is to do this in large enough

numbers they don’t have to be huge but

they have to be large enough for the

companies to notice and care

so we are working to educate the

workforce current and future employees

about the need for companies to get off

the sidelines about the role they

including you can play in making that

happen

and we’re working with groups like

influence map in the uk

which is scoring companies on how they

use their influence on climate

to ensure that employees and students

have information about which companies

are speaking up and which are silent

and then we’re giving them tools to

raise their voices together

so just to wrap up what can you do first

thing is

talk about it you have more influence

than you might think

and there are almost certainly people

around you who feel the same way

together you can change things so talk

to colleagues talk to your box

boss talk to other executives where you

work if you’re a student

talk to other students and make clear at

job fairs and in job interviews

that this is an issue that matters to

you don’t be

silent just like we don’t want the

companies to be silent

we all need to get off the sidelines or

the fossil fuel companies will continue

to dominate the conversation

don’t accept that the situation is

broken and we can’t change it

the business’s usual path is pretty

bleak we can choose a much brighter

future

but we have to choose it and enlist

others to join in making it happen

second ask questions of your employer

or potential employers about what

they’re doing on climate in their

operations their supply chain their

products

and especially in using their influence

on public policy

and here it can get uncomfortable you

need to be persistent

don’t be surprised especially if you’re

talking to a company that’s been leading

on climate if the initial

response feels a bit like a brush off

hey we’re leading we’re doing all this

stuff we’ve spoken out on these three

things

we’re great i would say they’re good we

need them to be great

be polite keep asking push on what they

need to do not just what they’ve done

which may be really good but it’s not

enough

encourage your fellow employees and

students to do the same

third organize with fellow employees to

encourage your company lobbying for

climate

earlier this year we saw over 150

companies sign a joint letter to the

european commission

encouraging them to invest recovery

money in building the foundation for a

low-carbon economy

not just to rebuild what we had before

and we’re seeing signs of hope in the us

with over 30 companies sending a similar

letter to the us congress this summer

and as i said some companies have been

speaking up on state level policies that

can really move the needle

like the one in virginia now is really

the time if we’re going to cut emissions

in half in the next decade

we’ve got to get policies in place in

the next one to two years to

really move the needle especially in the

u.s where i think 2021 will be an

absolutely critical year for policy

change on climate

regardless of the outcome of the

election in november we need to bend the

curve on climate

quickly and we need much more aggressive

public policy to make that happen

fourth and this is a little more effort

take the time to get educated about the

climate policies being debated both

where you live

and in other places where your company

or a company you’re interested in

operates and push your company to

support the decent policies

we don’t want companies so we use

electricity we’ll be involved in

electricity policy but we’re not a

transportation

company so we don’t we’re not going to

get engaged there they need to get

involved in climate

policy all the different sectors and all

the different kinds of policies

and it’s important that the companies

and you

should you shouldn’t be overly

ideological about what policies to

support

climate is complex politics is messy

we need decent policies not perfect ones

a decent policy that drives progress and

that can be improved later

is far far better than no policy at all

which is

not exactly where we are but we’re

moving far too slowly we have way too

little

you can learn more about the kinds of

policies companies should be supporting

in our policy guide for business leaders

if you go to climatevoice.org and click

on resources

scroll down you’ll find it it’s a short

read about eight pages

including the table contents so great

for the beach or wherever else you like

to read you can

get to it i think pretty quickly and

then finally

this is the big call to action add your

voice to thousands of others

calling on companies helping to raise

the bar for companies

to get them to unlock their hidden power

to change the game on climate

[音乐]

我要谈谈

我所说的公司隐藏的力量

来改变

你从 hal 和 john 那里听到的气候游戏,我

同意他们所说的关于

需要什么是一大堆

东西 我会更深入地了解

这个,嗯,我确实有一些

不寻常的观点,所以我要从

我的一些背景

开始 我

在麻省理工学院担任计算机科学教授的职业生涯

我在 90 年代中期搬到了西部,我

在他们的计算机硬件和软件研究实验室的 digital 工作,

然后我搬到了 akamai,在那里我担任首席

架构师,然后我开始

学习 cto 很多关于商业

方面的事情,而不仅仅是技术方面,然后大约

15 年前,我

开始对气候感到恐惧,

这就是

我经常在凌晨 3 点

睡不着的时候,

我并不担心 或炖

你知道一些硬技术公关 工作中的问题或

人的问题,或者

偶尔是孩子睡不着觉或

其他什么,

但这是我在思考气候

变化以及它对我的未来

和我的孩子的未来以及每个人的未来意味着什么

,我正在把太阳能放在我

买的房子里 普锐斯是当时清洁汽车的巅峰之作,

但很明显,

我需要做的事情比我作为

个人在自己的生活

中所能做的要多得多,而且我决定改变职业

,看看我是否能找到一种方法来

做出贡献 只是在我的个人生活中,

在气候方面的专业方面,我很幸运在 2006 年

在谷歌找到了一份工作,

并获得了一份章程,以弄清楚

他们将在气候方面做什么,这是一个

令人难以置信的

机会,他们对我冒了很大的风险

,反之 反之亦然,我

在谷歌领导气候和清洁能源工作大约

六年

,然后我搬到 Facebook 担任

类似职位大约六年

,我有幸在两家

公司都

涉足了许多

解决气候危机所需的资金,

包括研发

风险投资,以资助早期的

女王科技初创公司项目融资

,随着时间的推移,

谷歌从我在那里开始,但

更多,因为

他们提供了数十亿美元的

债务和股权来资助清洁能源

项目

利用我们的购买力推动

市场

,然后通过

可再生能源买家

联盟 re 100 等行业团体合作,利用我们的

集体购买力

更大范围内推动市场,我为

我在 谷歌在 facebook 上,

以及

这些公司的可持续发展团队

和我合作过的许多其他公司

继续做的事情

,但三年前我仍然对

气候

感到恐惧,我

很难意识到

,对于公司的所有伟大的事情

像谷歌、脸书和

许多其他

公司一样,不仅仅是科技公司在做,我们

在气候方面的行动还不够快 我的意思是

我知道,但

你知道三年前,当我

想到你知道我下一步

做什么 Facebook 下一步做什么我下一步应该做什么

它真的开始流行起来,

今年它更加真实这是

大约一个月前,我妻子在旧金山拍了一张照片

,那是我住的地方,这就是 9 月初

中午的天空,

因为我们在这里发现的野火冒出的烟雾

,我们正处于

美国西部前所未有的野火季节

东海岸和墨西哥湾沿岸前所未有的飓风季节 我们在

世界各地看到了许多其他自然灾害

,部分原因是气候变化,

随着

气温

升高,情况只会变得更糟 你们中的许多人都扎根于

技术

我开始从事技术工作 我

在谷歌和 Facebook 转换到

促进

和扩展技术解决方案以

应对气候变化

,我们确实需要新技术来解决

这个问题 roblem 和 john doerr

指出我们没有我们需要的所有解决方案

他说他认为我们今天拥有的

技术可以达到 70% 或 80

% 的道路

我不知道确切的数字是多少

我认为 70 到

80 可能是一个很好的猜测,我们没有

足够快地部署这项技术

,我们确实需要新技术来解决

一些难以脱碳的行业,并

让我们知道如何

脱碳的行业更容易、更便宜、

更快等等

我们确实需要公司加强和

自愿阅读,因为谷歌

Facebook 数百人现在

一直在做,

但几年前我开始理解,

因为我退后一步思考

我想去哪里,脸书

需要去哪里,去哪里 世界需要

去我真的明白

技术创新和公司

自愿领导自然

市场力量

这还不够我们赢了我们正在

赢但我们赢得太慢而且

随着气候变化

缓慢获胜与失去

两年前的 ipcc 1.5 度报告相同

列出了

升温

两三或四摄氏度的可能后果,这

可能

非常可怕,我们知道有

临界点,尽管我们不知道

它们的确切位置 是这使得

不加快工作速度

的风险不确定性很高,我们知道我们

有一个碳预算,我们正在

迅速

通过,因为我们希望

未来有一些解决方案可以

吸回所有的碳

我们需要在气候问题上迅速采取行动,

正如 hal

和 john 所说,我们需要到 2030 年将排放量减少

一半,到 2050 年实现净零排放

,我真的很喜欢关注 20 30 这个

数字,

因为 2050 年至关重要,但如果我们不这样做” t

到 2030 年将排放量减少一半或接近一半

我们深陷困境,这

是我们应该关注的问题,这意味着

我们现在需要采取行动,

这样我们才能创造一个更清洁、

更光明的未来,但这将不会 做

一些工作

,正如约翰所说,我听过

哈维多次说

这一切都与速度和规模有关,它是

关于快速行动并以

巨大的规模进行公司可以发挥关键

作用,

而不仅仅是科技公司要明确

这是该行业 我一生都在

工作,但

各行各业的公司,尤其是大公司,

但他们需要做的比他们一直在做的更多

,我们所有人都

需要帮助他们做到这一点,所以这

就是我在 2018 年

决定的原因 离开 Facebook,

今年早些时候,我成立了一个非营利性

气候之声,以鼓励公司

在未来十年内加强我们需要他们的领导力,

而不仅仅是他们过去十年一直在做的事情,而不仅仅是他们所做的事情。

我愿意做并找到

相对容易的事情,

但我们需要他们做的事情

,我说这不仅仅是技术,

不仅仅是公司自愿

清理自己的业务,

我们需要的远不止这些来解决

气候危机,

所以我喜欢 把它想象成一种

即兴表演,是的,

所以我们需要基础科学,我们需要技术

创新,

我们需要融资,大量资金将

不得不推动

我们想做的事情,我们已经看到

今年随着各种复苏

或刺激或

或任何

你想称政府的

东西 一切都需要进行大规模

部署

,我们需要在

任何地方获得清洁能源,让女王交通运输

清洁建筑,清理工业等等

,我们需要个人的行为改变和

自愿行动

,可能还需要文化改变,以

实现其中的一些

大多数人都在想

公司可以做些什么来帮助应对气候

变化

,正是这些创新的东西,

利用他们的市场力量清理自己的运营,

主要购买者

推动 SCA 我和我的同事在

谷歌和脸书

所做的大部分工作

以及人们在

其他数百家

开始真正

采取行动应对气候变化的公司所做的大部分工作,但仅此而已 不足以

以所需的速度和规模移动,

因为 hal

说我们需要公共政策 明智的政策

可以支持

和推动所有其他事情

它可以降低风险

它可以推动更快的投资

创新和部署

,这是我认为的一个非常重要的观点

研究界的很多人肯定不明白,

直到

你知道也许几年前

部署会

降低成本,因为部署

支持的

创新不是实验室中必然发生的那种创新,而是发生在实验室中的那种创新

你边

做边学,因为你有钱

投资

于改进流程,这

是推动 CO 大量

减少的重要原因

在过去的几年里,风能和太阳能中的 sts

甚至在不够便宜的电池中,

但它们已经大幅下降,

但遗憾的是排放量仍在上升,

也许今年不会因为大流行

而上升,但总体趋势远未

达到 必须如此,即使在

排放量开始下降的地方,

它们的下降速度也不够快,因为约翰·多

尔说,未来十年

排放量需要每年下降

8% 到 10%

,然后在此之后继续下降

排放

量没有

像需要的那样快速下降的原因主要是

因为我们没有足够有力的

政策到位

行为改变发生的

速度远远不够快,老实说,我认为

你认识一些人,我不相信人们

只会改变他们的行为,

这将解决这个问题,我们需要

一切,这是绝对

在美国确实如此

我们没有足够强有力的政策

到位 这

在几乎所有其他国家也是如此 我们

在欧盟的一些国家看到了令人鼓舞的迹象

认为这非常

令人鼓舞 我们,但我们

需要在任何地方更快地行动,

所以为什么我们没有我们需要的

公共政策,这

真的是我想要关注的地方,因为我

认为哈维是绝对正确的

,我认为卡尔和约翰都是正确的,

但我们需要 公共政策问题

我们为什么不在这里

谈论这个可能有点不舒服它开始听起来很

政治

但公共政策是关于权力和

影响力的

,今天在气候和能源政策上占主导地位的商业声音

来自化石燃料 工业界

,而且总的来说,在过去的 40

年里,

他们一直热衷

在气候行动上缓慢或根本不采取行动,他们发布了

许多错误信息,试图

混淆 并使其更难

通过真正的气候

政策 他们希望保持

现状 一些化石燃料公司开始改变这种情况,

但他们中的大多数仍在

努力维持现状

,他们真的很强大 几十年来,

在停止

满足气候方面的进展方面取得了令人难以置信的成功,

以使这一点

更加清晰

研究表明,化石燃料

行业在

2000 年的最后一口井中,2016 年在美国的支出超过了支持气候

倡导者

的 10 倍,我们正在

根据研究,不是说少量的钱

,那个时期的化石燃料行业花费了大约

20 亿美元,其中 10 亿美元

用于气候游说,几乎所有这些都是

为了

停止或削弱或延迟

有用的气候政策,并且在气候方面有

多种形式的影响 政治 这

不仅仅是花在游说

上的钱 还有竞选捐款 还有

其他方式获得

政治家的青睐并使其变得清晰 对他们

来说,他们应该按照你想要的方式投票,

否则你

可能会让他们被赶出他们的席位,

但我们的化石燃料利益

超过了亲气候倡导者 10 比

1,并做

很多其他事情来影响

对话

而大多数其他公司都

坐在一边,

所以想象一下在不久的

将来,化石

燃料公司的影响力被其他

强大力量平衡,这是一场公平的

战斗,孤独的棋子实际上不仅仅是几个

环保组织 世界各地有很多

环保组织

和数百万年轻人

而不是那些为此而战的

年轻人和投票的人,但这还

不足以对抗化石燃料

公司正在做的事情

,他们实际上可以袖手旁观

,让这场斗争成为一场公平的斗争

大多数公司没有投资于

化石燃料经济

,其中许多公司正在对

气候解决方案进行创新,其中许多公司正在

清理自己的 o

他们在气候方面一直处于领先地位的操作及其供应链

,其中包括科技医疗保健

酒店

生物技术消费品许多其他

行业

他们都有影响,但大多数人选择

不使用

或很少使用它,我们需要

他们远离 在这场

国际象棋游戏中

,帮助对抗

将我们拖

向错误方向的强大力量,这意味着要

坚定一致地倡导政策

,确保我们

在整个经济中

更广泛地迅速脱碳

运营他们的供应链

他们的产品,尤其是他们

对公共政策的倡导

他们应该要求的一切

他们所做的不仅仅是

对财务底线有什么

影响,而是对我们的集体气候底线有什么影响

他们今天没有问这个问题

化石燃料公司要明确

,几十年来一直在全力以赴,

主要是错误的

尽管正如我所说,我们已经

从其中一些公司(包括 bp 和壳牌)那里看到了一些积极的迹象,但

您可能想知道为什么所有

其他在气候问题上表现良好的公司

一直处于领先地位,为什么

他们不说话 赞成

对气候采取大胆行动

,简短的回答是他们害怕

看到风险,老实说,风险是

真实的

气候已经如此政治化,我认为

非常有意,

尤其是在美国

如果一家公司采取 在气候政策上的坚定立场,因此

在过去的几十年中,

许多公司决定他们

应该是非政治性的,

除非政策问题直接影响到

他们实际上不仅在气候方面,而且在

许多问题上公司已经决定

政治不适合他们,除非他们

真的需要 在

那里,他们保持沉默,他们喜欢

将其视为中立,

他们说他们应该远离气候

政治,因为

他们不是能源公司 或

运输公司或建筑

公司,因此大多数气候政策

在短期内不会直接影响他们

,他们说他们希望他们

专注于他们可以做的最好的事情,

以在他们的运营中利用他们的超级大国

他们的产品他们的供应

我们绝对希望他们使用他们的

超级大国,但这还不够,我

认为这在过去 10 年

或 20 年中已经很明显,因为公司一直在使用

他们的超级大国,

排放量仍在被

控制,因为气候政策辩论中的权力极度失衡。

沉默实际上是

与拼命维持现状的强大力量的同谋

公司尤其是大公司

有很大的影响力

我们需要他们为

集体利益而使用它不仅仅是为了他们自己的

利益

这是他们隐藏的力量他们

有影响力我们需要 他们把它从

隐藏中拿出来 他们都拥有它

他们大多选择不使用它 我们需要

他们加强并使用

它 我们共同的未来,

所以你可能会想,哎呀,

这能行吗?

动力就公共政策发表意见,

即使它没有直接影响

他们自己的运营和底线

,最近一个真正鼓舞人心的

例子来自十年前的 LGBT 权利

运动,有数百家

公司

制定了促进平等的进步内部政策 对于

lgbt 员工,

但公司在围绕美国公共政策的辩论中大多保持沉默

,美国

在两三年内发生了翻天覆地的变化,

这在很大程度上是因为

员工和学生向公司发出了一个非常明确的

信号,

那就是现在是时候 他们发声 所以

员工做了什么

他们在内部组织 他们

在全体会议上发声 与高管就

内部信息进行会议 董事会

与高管直接对话

他们与外部团体协调

外部团体威胁说,

如果他们

不开始说出来

,他们会通过沉默来公开指责这些公司是同谋,结果令人惊讶的是,公司

在婚姻平等问题上发表了讲话

州和联邦一级

他们就

印第安纳州的《宗教自由恢复法案

》发表意见并予以废除 他们就北卡罗来纳州的

卫生间

法案发表意见并予以废除,

以及许多其他州政策 其他

宗教自由

法案 其他州的其他卫生间法案

他们帮助改变了结果,

他们大声疾呼,

因为对他们来说,lgbt 权利

从一个无关紧要的问题变成了一个重要的问题

,因为继续保持

沉默可能会影响招聘

和保留结果是公司

从旁观者 我们不歧视

人们所说的反欺凌文学

我们提倡平等的立场

我们积极干预以改变

制度,而不仅仅是让自己成为好人

,今年我们看到了类似的

动态,因为公司

已经从不存在

种族主义转变为试图弄清楚如何

在 面对反对

种族平等和

压迫的大规模抗议,这就是为什么我们在今年早些时候发起气候之声的原因

公司关心他们的主要

利益相关者 他们的客户 他们的

投资者

,尤其是他们的员工 我们正在

动员劳动力做出承诺

说服公司现在是

时候 发声是

因为工人有影响力,当

我们

特别是一起发声时,我们就有力量,

我们需要公司

在气候问题上做出同样的转变,从我们不

污染

到积极反污染,

就像他们在其他问题上所做的那样

,变得强大 始终如一地

倡导公共气候

政策 他们一起行动 我们可以

做到这一点

它正在开始 今年春天早些时候

在弗吉尼亚州工作 弗吉尼亚州清洁经济

法案签署成为法律

清洁能源公司在那里支持它并不

奇怪,但

许多不在能源领域

的公司也是如此 运营和

底线

这是州级趋势的一部分,在美国

积极实现碳

减排

目标 这是南部第一个

拥有此类法律的州

,这是我们的第一个政策胜利 这是

我们在很多地方的一个例子 '

开始看到更多的公司

离开场边

并大声疾呼支持气候

政策,这正在产生真正

的影响

我们需要

以所需的速度和规模推动事情的政策

所以一个非常重要的一点你可能

会想好我住在弗吉尼亚州,或者我

住在

巴黎,或者我住在 无论我为什么

关心世界另一端的政策,不只是

弗吉尼亚州的人们应该就

弗吉尼亚州或巴黎的一项法案提出

关于法国或欧盟政策的声音,

我们需要气候行动和气候

政策 在任何地方都一样,

但我们在任何地方都需要它

气候之声可以在任何地方赋予你的声音力量

因为假设我在谷歌工作,如果

你是

世界任何地方的谷歌员工,你可以激励

谷歌在北卡罗来纳州

或他们经营的任何其他地方发声 同样,

如果你是

任何地方的学生并且谷歌有兴趣

雇用你,你可以激励谷歌

在他们经营的任何地方大声疾呼,所以无论

你在哪里,

如果你工作或有兴趣工作的公司

在它经营你的任何地方的政策上过于安静 可以帮助改变

这一点

,关键是要以足够大的

数量这样做,它们不必很大,但

必须足够大,让

公司注意到 和关心,

所以我们正在努力教育

员工当前和未来的员工

,让他们了解公司需要从

场外了解他们

包括你在内可以在实现这一

目标方面发挥的作用

,我们正在与

英国的影响力地图等团体合作

正在对公司如何

利用其对气候的影响进行评分,

以确保员工和

学生了解哪些公司

在发声,哪些公司保持沉默

,然后我们为他们提供工具来

共同提高他们的声音,

以便总结你能做些什么 要做的第一

件事就是

谈论它 你的影响力

比你想象

的要大 几乎可以肯定

你周围的人有同样的

感觉 你可以改变事情 所以和

同事谈谈 和你的

老板谈谈 和你工作的其他高管谈谈

你是一名学生,

与其他学生交谈,并在

招聘会和求职面试

中明确表示这是一个对你很重要的问题,

不要像我们一样保持沉默” 不希望

公司保持沉默

我们都需要保持观望

否则化石燃料公司将

继续主导对话

不要接受形势已经

破裂并且我们无法改变的

事实 企业通常的道路非常

暗淡 我们 可以选择一个更光明的

未来,

但我们必须选择它并招募

其他人加入以实现它

第二次向您的雇主

或潜在雇主询问

他们在运营中在气候方面所做的事情

他们的供应链他们的

产品

,特别是在使用 他们对公共政策的影响,

这里可能会让人感到不舒服你

需要坚持不懈

不要感到惊讶,特别是如果你

正在与一家在气候方面处于领先地位的公司交谈,

如果最初的

反应感觉有点像刷掉

嘿,我们是 领导我们正在做所有这些

事情我们已经在这三件事上说出来

我们很棒我会说他们很好我们

需要他们

很棒有礼貌不断要求推动他们

需要做什么n 不仅仅是他们所做

的可能真的很好,但这还不够

鼓励您的同事和

学生

与同事一起组织第三次组织以

鼓励您的公司为

气候问题游说

今年早些时候我们看到超过 150

家公司签署了联名信 致

欧盟委员会,

鼓励他们投资复苏

资金,为低碳经济奠定基础,

而不仅仅是重建我们以前拥有的东西

,我们看到美国有希望的迹象,

有 30 多家公司向美国发送了类似的

信函 今年夏天的国会

,正如我所说的,一些公司一直

在就州一级的政策发表意见,这些政策可以像弗吉尼亚州的政策

那样真正起到推动作用

必须

在未来一到两年内制定政策才能

真正发挥作用,尤其是在

美国,我认为 2021 年将是气候变化

政策绝对关键的

一年 无论 11 月的选举结果如何,

我们都需要迅速扭转

气候变化曲线

,我们需要更加积极的

公共政策来实现这一目标

,这需要更多的努力

花时间来了解正在辩论的

气候政策

在您

居住的地方以及您

的公司或您感兴趣的公司

运营的其他地方,并推动您的公司

支持

我们不想要公司的体面政策,因此我们使用

电力我们将参与

电力政策,但我们 不是

运输

公司,所以我们不参与,我们

不会参与其中,他们需要参与

所有不同部门和

所有不同类型的

政策的气候政策,重要的是公司

和你

应该应该这样做'

对支持气候的政策不要过于意识形态

化 复杂的政治是混乱的

我们需要体面的政策而不是完美

的政策

晚一点

总比没有政策好得多,

并不完全是我们所处的位置,但我们的

行动太慢了我们拥有的太少了

您可以

在我们的商业政策指南中了解更多关于公司应该支持的政策类型 领导者

如果你去climatevoice.org并

点击资源

向下滚动你会发现它是一个简短的

阅读大约八页

包括表格内容非常

适合海滩或任何你

喜欢阅读的地方你可以

得到它我认为很漂亮 很快,

最后,

这是一个重要的行动号召,

向成千上万的其他人发出你的声音,

呼吁公司帮助

提高公司的标准

,让他们释放隐藏的力量

来改变气候游戏