The Psychology of Climate Change

okay

listen what if i somehow traveled

backwards in time and i accidentally

distracted my grandma from ever meeting

my grandpa

because then my dad wouldn’t be born

right and then

i wouldn’t even exist a lot of us like

to joke that

if we had the ability to travel

backwards in time we’d be scared that a

minor action we took

then could massively impact our current

lives

but we neglect to see that minor actions

we take today

could have a massive impact on the

future this idea of the butterfly effect

works both positively and negatively

if we make small changes they’ll add up

over time to benefit the future

but if we continue making poor decisions

their effects will snowball

ultimately causing our downfall one

example of the butterfly effect can be

seen in the topic

of climate change now everybody already

knows climate change is a problem

so why is nobody acting on it we are

constantly inundated with facts and

statistics that don’t motivate us to

change very much

but by understanding the psychology

behind our own actions

or lack thereof we can be better

motivated to make significant changes in

our own lives

by enforcing communities that normalize

caring about

climate change and supporting policies

that directly fight the problems

the first problem and the first reason

why we don’t act in the face of climate

change is that we don’t view climate

change itself

as a real threat the climatechat.org

a website guiding a larger discussion on

the topic of climate change

has come up with the acronym pain to

explain why

the p stands for personal we tend to

play this blame game

pinning problems on a particular person

or group of people

when in reality climate change isn’t the

direct result of a specific person

we are all responsible for the future of

our earth

the a stands for abrupt we notice

changes that happen

abruptly and climate change is more of a

gradual threat

so it doesn’t really set off the alarm

bells in our heads

even so a study by fc moore assistant

professor in the department of

environmental science and policy at uc

davis

found that we are actually growing

accustomed to climate change

implying that we are even less likely to

act the longer it goes on

the i stands for immoral we share

articles and videos that make us feel

angry or sad

but climate change just doesn’t evoke

these emotions to the extent where we

can truly grasp how terrible its effects

are

sure polar bears are losing their

habitats and biodiversity is decreasing

but what does that mean for humans

regulations are being cut under the

trump administration

but what effect does that really have on

our everyday lives

even though some natural disasters

linked to climate change have directly

affected people

like hurricane katrina a study by howe

in 2019 found that these events

don’t cause people’s opinions of climate

change to shift very much in the long

term

the n stands for now which is kind of

similar to the a for abrupt

let’s start this one off with an example

we’re all aware that

average temperatures across the globe

are hitting record highs

in antarctica in february of this year

scientists reported the highest recorded

temperature on the continent

64.9 degrees fahrenheit

that was warmer than los angeles on the

same day

so we all know that you know global

temperatures are following an upward

trend

but it’s not like we receive government

push notifications on our phones telling

us

the weather tomorrow is going to be 120

degrees so we gotta act fast

no climate change is just happening too

gradually

we don’t perceive the temperature

increases let alone

all the other effects of climate change

as a real threat to our everyday lives

we aren’t seeing the devastating impacts

right now

and so it’s hard for us to process why

we should change our behavior

and you know even if we did receive

government push notifications telling us

the weather was going to be 120 degrees

it’s not guaranteed that everybody would

act you’ve probably seen on the news

people

refusing to evacuate their homes even in

the midst of a massive hurricane

in a time article in 2018 jeffrey kluger

states that humans have evolved to care

more about

immediate threats than those in the

future and so it’s hard for us to wrap

our heads around

why we should make sacrifices now like

evacuating our homes

even if this will help prevent future

disasters

now even if climate change did follow

the acronym of pain

even if it were personal abrupt immoral

and happening now

there are still psychological barriers

preventing us from changing our behavior

it’s no secret that humans are primarily

self-centered animals

since this increased our ancestors

chances of survival

as a result humans have a region of our

brains called the medial prefrontal

cortex

or the mpsc that has to do with

regulating self-centered emotions and

behavior

if you went under an mri and i asked you

to think about yourself

your mpfc would light up with activity a

similar thing happens if i ask you to

think about a close friend or a family

member

although to a lesser extent but if i ask

you to think about

a random stranger like residents of a

small town in ohio

your mpfc would barely light up at all

now here is the interesting bit

according to a study by behavioral

neuroscientist darjumbo in 2009

when you think about your future self 5

or 10 years into the future

your mpfc doesn’t really light up

at all we don’t recognize our future

selves

as ourselves so our usual self-centered

behavior in wanting to protect our own

interests and our chances of survival

doesn’t really kick in for our future

selves

and this way of thinking is significant

when the threat

to our survival is climate change

so now that we understand the processes

behind why we are so slow to act

we can discuss two powerful yet

realistic solutions

these solutions are centered around a

group mentality rather than the

individual

because in this way we can overcome the

individual psychological barriers

and instead work towards change as part

of a group

the first solution is enforcing

communities that normalize caring about

climate change

we all exist as parts of communities

whether it’s our friends our classmates

our schools our workplaces

the bay area california and the entire

united states

and we are also part of online

communities that might bridge continents

a study by jackson in 2008 says that we

are more likely to work towards a goal

if we are part of a tight-knit community

or a group of friends working towards

the same goal we can utilize this idea

of

group mentality to our advantage by

holding fundraisers in clubs at school

participating in events like bike to

work days and bringing food to book club

meetings or family reunions

in reusable containers rather than

plastic

and when we normalize and encourage this

type of behavior

people feel peer pressured in a good way

to fit

in going back to the idea of the

butterfly effect

when we make small contributions they

will add up across

communities and over time the second

solution

is supporting policies that directly

fight the problems

many of you have probably heard that

global warming is largely due to big

corporations for

reusing tons of carbon dioxide and

releasing it into the air

or using unnecessary amounts of water

and

while this is true it doesn’t mean that

well citizens actions are completely

useless if companies are doing all this

terrible stuff anyways

instead it means that we need to be

fighting back and pushing congress to

support policies that regulate

energy and water usage greta tunberg is

at the forefront of climate strikes and

rallies across the globe

and while these help serve as a public

image of unity against a common threat

you don’t need to participate in a

strike to have an impact

multiple websites like the environmental

defense fund at edf.org

offer specific petitions that you can

sign and ways to contact your local

representatives

now let’s take a step back for a second

to put all of this

into perspective if we each do our part

in the fight against climate change by

enforcing it in our individual

communities

and supporting policies that regulate

corporations we just might be able to

subvert

a slow and painful death for thousands

and thousands of species

you may never get the opportunity to

travel backwards in time

to accidentally distract grandma from

ever meeting grandpa

but you do have the opportunity to shift

the entire fate

of our planet in the words of ernest

hemingway

the earth is a fine place and worth

fighting for

and the power to do so is in your

hands thank you

you

好吧,

听着,如果我以某种方式

倒退了,我不小心

让我奶奶分心了,

因为那时我爸爸不会

出生,然后

我就不会存在了。很多人

喜欢开玩笑说,

如果我们有 及时

倒退的能力 我们害怕

我们当时采取的一个

小动作可能会对我们现在的生活产生巨大影响,

但我们忽略了

我们今天采取的小动作

可能对未来产生巨大影响

这种蝴蝶效应的想法

如果我们做出微小的改变,它们会

随着时间的推移而累积起来,造福未来

现在改变每个人都已经

知道气候变化是一个问题

那么为什么没有人采取行动我们

经常被事实和统计数据所淹没,这些事实和

统计数据并不能激励我们

改变 嗯,

但是通过了解

我们自己行为背后的心理

或缺乏行为,我们可以更好地

激励

我们

通过加强

气候变化的关注正常化的社区和支持

直接解决问题

的政策来改变我们自己的生活,这是第一个问题和第一个原因

为什么我们不面对气候变化采取行动

是因为我们不认为气候

变化本身

是一个真正的威胁climatechat.org

一个指导关于气候变化主题的更广泛讨论的网站

提出了首字母缩略词pain to

解释

为什么 p 代表个人 我们倾向于

玩这种指责游戏

将问题归咎于特定的人

或一群人

,而实际上气候变化不是

特定人的直接结果

我们都

对地球

的未来负责 a 代表突然

发生的变化,我们注意到突然发生的变化

,气候变化更像是一种

渐进的威胁,

所以它并没有真正在我们的生活中敲响

警钟

即便如此,加州

大学戴维斯分校

环境科学与政策系 fc moore 助理教授的一项研究

发现,我们实际上越来越

习惯于气候变化,这意味着气候变化

持续的时间越长,我们就越不可能采取行动。

i 代表不道德 我们分享

让我们感到愤怒或悲伤的文章和视频,

但气候变化并没有唤起

这些情绪,以至于我们

无法真正理解它的影响有多可怕,

北极熊正在失去它们的

栖息地,生物多样性正在减少,

但那是什么?

特朗普政府

正在削减

对人类意味着

什么 从长远来看,不会导致人们对气候

变化的看法发生很大变化

n 代表现在,这有点

像 与 a 一样,

让我们从一个例子开始,

我们都知道,

今年 2 月,全球平均

气温在南极洲

创下

历史新高 同一天比洛杉矶温暖,

所以我们都知道你知道全球

气温正在呈上升

趋势,

但这不像

我们在手机上收到政府推送通知,告诉

我们

明天的天气将是 120

度,所以我们必须迅速采取行动

没有气候变化只是太缓慢地发生了

我们不认为温度

升高更不用说

气候变化的所有其他影响

对我们日常生活的真正威胁

我们现在没有看到破坏性影响

,因此我们很难 处理为什么

我们应该改变我们的行为

,即使我们确实收到了

政府推送通知,告诉

我们天气将要改变,你也知道 120

度 不能保证每个人都会

采取行动 你可能已经在新闻中看到

人们

即使在大规模飓风中也拒绝撤离家园

在 2018 年的一篇时代文章中杰弗里克鲁格

指出人类已经进化到

更关心

即时 比

未来的威胁更大,所以我们很难

理解为什么我们现在应该做出牺牲,比如

撤离我们的家园,

即使这将有助于现在防止未来的

灾难,

即使气候变化确实遵循

痛苦的首字母缩略词,

即使它是 个人突然的不道德

和正在发生 现在

仍然有心理障碍

阻止我们改变我们的行为

人类主要

是以自我为中心的动物

已经不是什么秘密了,因为这增加了我们祖先

的生存机会

,因此人类在我们的

大脑中有一个称为内侧前额叶的区域

如果您接受核磁共振检查,则与调节以自我为中心的情绪和行为有关的皮层或 mpsc 我让

你想想你自己,

你的 mpfc 会因活动而亮起

如果我让你

想想一个亲密的朋友或家人,

虽然程度较轻,但如果我让

你想想

一个随机的陌生人,比如

俄亥俄州一个小镇的居民现在

你的 mpfc 几乎不会亮起来

根据行为

神经科学家 darjumbo 在 2009 年的一项研究,

当你考虑未来 5 年

或 10 年后

你的 mpfc 不会点亮时,这是有趣的一点 真的很高兴

我们不承认我们未来的

自我

就是我们自己,所以我们通常以自我为中心的

行为想要保护我们自己的

利益和我们的生存机会

并没有真正为我们未来的

自我发挥作用

,这种思维方式是 当

对我们生存的威胁是气候变化时意义重大,

所以现在我们了解了

为什么我们行动如此缓慢背后的过程,

我们可以讨论两个强大而

现实的解决方案,

这些解决方案是中心 d 围绕

群体心态而不是

个人,

因为通过这种方式,我们可以克服

个人的心理障碍

,而是

作为一个群体

的一部分努力改变 第一个解决方案是强制

社区将关注

气候变化正常化

我们都作为社区的一部分存在

这是我们的朋友,我们的同学,

我们的学校,我们的工作

场所,加利福尼亚湾区和

整个美国

,我们也是

可能连接各大洲的在线社区的一部分,

杰克逊在 2008 年的一项研究表明,如果我们愿意,我们

更有可能朝着一个目标努力

作为紧密社区的一部分

或一群朝着同一个目标努力的朋友,

我们可以利用这种

集体心态的想法来发挥我们的优势,

在学校的俱乐部举办筹款活动,

参加诸如骑自行车上班等活动

,并为预订俱乐部会议带来食物

或家庭团聚

在可重复使用的容器中而不是

塑料中

,当我们规范和鼓励这种

类型的 b

当我们做出小的贡献时,他们

会在

社区中累积起来,随着时间的推移,第二个

解决

方案是支持直接

解决

你们中许多人遇到的问题的政策。 可能听说

全球变暖主要是由于大

公司

重复使用大量二氧化碳并将其

释放到空气中

或使用不必要的水量

虽然这是真的,但这并不意味着

如果公司正在做,那么公民的行动完全没有用

无论如何,所有这些可怕的东西

都意味着我们需要

反击并推动国会

支持规范

能源和用水的政策 greta tunberg

处于全球气候罢工和集会的最前沿,

而这些有助于作为公众

形象 团结一致对抗共同威胁,

您无需参与

罢工即可影响

多个网站 e

edf.org 上的环境防御基金

提供您可以签署的具体请愿书

以及联系您当地

代表的方式

现在让我们退后一步,

如果我们每个人都在对抗气候方面尽自己的一份

力量 通过

在我们的个人社区中执行它

并支持监管公司的政策来改变

我们也许能够

颠覆

成千上万物种的缓慢而痛苦的死亡

你可能永远不会有机会

及时倒退

以不小心分散奶奶的

注意力 爷爷,

但你确实有机会用

欧内斯特·海明威的话说

地球是一个美好的地方,值得

为之奋斗

,这样做的力量在你

手中谢谢你