The exploitation of US college athletes Tim Nevius

Transcriber:

In college sports, American universities
are exploiting, disproportionately,

Black athletes

for billions of dollars,

while diminishing their education,
health and safety.

Let me start with a bit of history.

In November 1984,

an undersized quarterback
from Boston College named Doug Flutie

threw a game-winning touchdown pass
against the defending national champions,

University of Miami.

As the Hail Mary pass floated
through the fall air

in front of a packed stadium,

millions more watched
with excitement on TV.

After the dramatic win,

undergraduate application rates
at Boston College shot up by 30 percent,

revealing to universities
the enormous marketing value

of building high-profile sports programs.

That same year, the United States
Supreme Court heard a case

in which the Universities
of Georgia and Oklahoma

challenged rules that limited the number
of football games they could play on TV.

Those schools saw the opportunity
to not only make money

by televising their games,

but to also market
their universities to the world.

The Supreme Court agreed that
the broadcasting restrictions were illegal

and schools began to negotiate
TV deals worth millions.

That case opened the floodgates
to money in college athletics,

and with it, ever-growing
conflicts of interest

that prioritize sports over education,

promote wins over health and safety

and reinforce the disturbing racial
and economic inequities in our country.

Since then, the growth in college sports
has been extraordinary

and schools have earned
record revenues year after year.

The spending during that same time period

has increased at almost
the same dramatic pace,

as universities engage in an arms race
to the top of the rankings.

Massive expenditures on new stadiums,
bigger staffs and record salaries

have made it appear,
on the books at least,

that athletic departments
are losing money,

while they build lavish facilities

and make multimillionaires
out of coaches and administrators.

In fact, in 40 out of 50 states,

the highest-paid public employee is now
a college football or basketball coach.

Meanwhile, college athletes, whose elite
talents generate these massive revenues,

are not only denied the ability
to share in the riches they create,

too many of them are not given
the education they’re promised, either.

Today, college athletes are exploited
to the tune of almost 15 billion dollars.

That’s how much money is generated
by college sports each year.

And I’m all too familiar
with the exploitation,

because I used to be responsible
for enforcing it.

Following my own college baseball career
at the University of Dayton,

I went on to law school
before becoming an investigator

at the National Collegiate
Athletic Association.

I traveled to college campuses
across the country

and helped enforce a 400-page rule book
that denies athletes the right to get paid

for their performance

or even profit from their own name.

For instance: unlike the music student
who, in addition to their scholarship,

can get paid to record a song,

or the English student who,
in addition to their scholarship,

can get paid to write a book,

college athletes cannot
profit from their talents

or even take a free meal

without being ruled ineligible
and risking their scholarship.

During my time as an investigator,

I questioned hundreds of athletes
and their families

about their financial transactions,

dug through their personal
bank and phone records

and scrutinized their relationships
to a humiliating degree,

all for the possibility that someone gave
them something beyond a scholarship,

no matter how petty.

In one case, I questioned
Ohio State football players

who received free tattoos and cash
in exchange for memorabilia.

The case received national attention
and became known as “Tattoo Gate,”

as if it were a scandal on par
with political espionage.

The players were suspended
and had to repay the cash

as well as the value of the tattoos.

In effect, unpaid athletes were fined
by a billion-dollar organization

that gets paid by sponsors to decorate
the athletes in corporate logos.

I was told my job was to promote fairness,
but there was nothing fair about that.

Shortly thereafter, I left the NCAA
and started fighting for the athletes.

It became increasingly clear to me

that rules supposedly designed
to prevent exploitation

instead allow a collection of universities
and their wealthy corporate sponsors

to profit off the athletes,

who are promised an education
and lured by a chance at the pros

but who too often end up with nothing.

Now, some people believe
college athletes get a free ride.

However, there is nothing free
about risking health and safety

while working 40 to 50 hours per week

as you fight to keep your scholarship.

In football alone,

there are over 20,000 injuries a year,

including 4,000 knee injuries
and 1,000 spinal injuries.

Since 2000, forty players have died.

Beyond football, a recent study revealed

that an estimated 60 percent
of Division 1 college athletes

suffer a major injury in their career,

and over half of them
endure chronic conditions

that last well beyond their playing days.

There is nothing free about that,

especially as the NCAA refuses to enforce
health and safety standards

and has denied in court
it even has that responsibility.

And about that education
they’re promised –

according to the College Sports
Research Institute,

Black football and basketball players
in the top five conferences

graduate at 22 and 37 percent lower

than the undergraduate population.

Those who do graduate are often shuffled
into majors with watered-down courses

that conform to their athletic schedules
to simply keep them eligible.

The time demands
and required focus on sports

makes it challenging for even
the most well-intentioned athlete

to get a meaningful education.

This is unacceptable
for a 15 dollar billion industry

run by institutions whose mission
is to educate young people.

Although plenty of athletes succeed,

their achievements don’t require
rules that deny pay

or a system that limits
educational opportunities

or neglects health and safety.

The fact is,

American universities oversee a
multibillion-dollar entertainment industry

that denies fundamental rights
to its essential workers,

a disproportionate number
of whom are Black,

while making millionaires of largely
white coaches and administrators.

This dynamic has not only deprived many
young people of a meaningful education,

it has shifted generations of wealth
away from mostly Black families

and represents the systemic inequities
plaguing our society.

The good news is that people
are starting to see the truth.

The NCAA’s own public polling

has revealed that a staggering
79 percent of the public

believe that colleges put money
ahead of their athletes.

State and federal lawmakers,
both Republican and Democrat,

have also taken notice and started to act.

Several US senators have rightly
described the problems in college sports

as a civil rights issue.

Meanwhile, college athletes
from across the country

have started to stand up to demand
greater health and safety protections,

representation rights,

attention to racial
and social justice issues

and economic fairness.

Those who think the players
should just stick to sports

fail to recognize how rarely
college athletes speak up

and ignore the great
personal risk they take

in confronting a powerful industry,

especially without any representation.

More importantly,
critics fail to acknowledge

that college athletes
are simply seeking rights

that are afforded to virtually
everyone else in this country

and basic protections that
shouldn’t even be in question.

I agree that college sports should
be an enjoyable distraction,

but not when they’re distracting us
from the very injustice they enable.

In his retirement,

the NCAA’s first and longest-serving
executive director, Walter Byers,

described college sports as

“the plantation mentality resurrected
and blessed by today’s campus executives.”

This is a telling quote from the man
who designed this system

and the one who knew it best.

But you don’t have to be an insider

to recognize the exploitation
of young people.

You don’t have to be
a Republican or a Democrat

to be troubled by the irresponsible
spending or the disregard for values

at our universities.

You don’t even have to be a sports fan.

You just have to believe
in basic ideas of fairness

and the values of higher education.

So let’s require that all college athletes

are given a chance
at a meaningful education.

Let’s demand responsible spending
by our universities

and fairly allocate the billions
of dollars being generated.

Let’s create robust
health and safety standards

to protect those
who entertain us with their bodies

and enforce those standards.

Let’s provide college athletes
with a representative body

so they have recourse
when things go wrong

and a voice about how
to make things right.

Finally, let’s rise
to the challenge of our time

and once and for all correct

the persistent racial
and economic inequities

that apply to college sports and beyond.

Change is long overdue,

but there has never been
a better time than now.

抄写员:

在大学体育运动中,美国大学
不成比例地剥削

黑人运动员

数十亿美元,

同时减少他们的教育、
健康和安全。

让我从一点历史开始。

1984 年 11 月,来自波士顿学院

的身材矮小四分卫
Doug Flutie 在与卫冕冠军迈阿密大学的

比赛中投出了一个制胜的达阵传球

当冰雹玛丽山口

在拥挤的体育场前飘过秋天的空气时,

数百万人
在电视上兴奋地观看。

在这场戏剧性的胜利之后,

波士顿学院的本科申请率猛增了 30%,

向大学展示

了建立备受瞩目的体育项目的巨大营销价值。

同年,美国
最高法院审理了一起案件

,佐治亚大学和俄克拉荷马大学对

限制
他们可以在电视上播放的足球比赛数量的规定提出质疑。

这些学校不仅看到了

通过电视转播他们的比赛

来赚钱的机会,而且还看到了
向全世界推销他们的大学的机会。

最高法院
同意广播限制是非法的

,学校开始谈判
价值数百万美元的电视交易。

该案打开了
大学体育资金的闸门

,随之而来的是不断增长

利益冲突,将体育置于教育之上,

促进胜利高于健康和安全,

并加剧了我国令人不安的种族
和经济不平等。

从那时起,大学体育运动的
增长非常惊人

,学校年复一年地获得了
创纪录的收入。

同一时期的支出


几乎同样惊人的速度增长,

因为大学进行了军备竞赛以争夺
排名榜首。

新体育场的巨额支出、
更大的员工人数和创纪录的薪水

,至少在账面上显示

,体育部门
正在亏损,

同时他们建造了豪华的设施

,并
从教练和管理人员中赚取了千万富翁。

事实上,在 50 个州中的 40 个州

,薪酬最高的公务员现在
是大学橄榄球或篮球教练。

与此同时,精英
人才创造了巨额收入

的大学运动员不仅被剥夺
了分享他们创造的财富的能力,

而且他们中的许多人也没有得到
他们所承诺的教育。

今天,大学运动员被剥削
到近 150 亿美元。

这就是
大学体育每年产生的收入。

而且我
对漏洞利用非常熟悉,

因为我曾经
负责执行它。

在代顿大学完成我自己的大学棒球生涯
后,

我进入法学院,
然后成为

全国大学
体育协会的调查员。


走遍了全国各地的大学校园,

并帮助执行了一本 400 页的规则手册
,该手册剥夺了运动员因表现而获得报酬

甚至从自己的名字中获利的权利。

例如:不像音乐
学生除了奖学金

还可以拿钱来录制歌曲,

或者英语
学生除了奖学金

还可以拿钱写书,

大学运动员不能
从他们的才华中受益

甚至在

不被裁定为不合格
并冒着获得奖学金的风险的情况下免费用餐。

在我担任调查员期间,

我向数百名运动员
及其家人

询问了他们的财务交易,

挖掘了他们的个人
银行和电话记录,


以一种屈辱的程度审查了他们的关系,

所有这些都是为了可能有人给了
他们奖学金以外的东西,

不管多么琐碎。

在一个案例中,我询问了
俄亥俄州立大学的足球运动员

,他们接受了免费纹身和现金
以换取纪念品。

此案受到全国关注
,被称为“纹身门”

,仿佛是
与政治间谍活动相提并论的丑闻。

球员们被停赛
,不得不偿还现金

以及纹身的价值。

实际上,无偿运动员
被一个数十亿美元的组织罚款,该组织

获得赞助商的报酬,以
在公司标志上装饰运动员。

有人告诉我,我的工作是促进公平,
但这并不公平。

此后不久,我离开了 NCAA
,开始为运动员而战。

我越来越清楚

,本应
旨在防止剥削的规则

反而允许一系列大学
及其富有的企业赞助

商从运动员

身上获利 没有什么。

现在,有些人认为
大学运动员可以免费乘坐。

但是,为了保住奖学金,每周工作 40 到 50 小时,
冒着健康和安全的风险并没有什么是免费的

仅在足球运动中,

每年就有超过 20,000 人受伤,

其中包括 4,000 人膝盖受伤
和 1,000 人脊椎受伤。

自 2000 年以来,已有 40 名球员死亡。

除了足球,最近的一项研究表明

,估计有 60%
的 1 级大学运动员

在职业生涯中遭受重伤,

其中超过一半的人
患有慢性病,这些疾病

会持续到他们的比赛日之后。

没有什么是免费的,

尤其是当 NCAA 拒绝执行
健康和安全标准

并且在法庭上否认
它甚至有这个责任时。

关于
他们所承诺的教育——

根据大学体育
研究所的数据,前五名会议中的

黑人足球和篮球运动员

毕业率分别比本科生低 22% 和 37

%。

那些确实毕业的人经常被改组
到专业,这些专业的课程被淡化了,这些

课程符合他们的运动时间表
,只是为了让他们有资格。

时间
要求和对运动的关注

使得即使
是最善意的运动员也

很难接受有意义的教育。

对于一个由以教育年轻人为使命的机构运营的 150 亿美元行业来说,这是不可接受的

尽管许多运动员取得了成功,但

他们的成就并不
需要拒绝支付报酬的规则

或限制
教育机会

或忽视健康和安全的制度。

事实是,

美国大学监管着一个
价值数十亿美元的娱乐产业

,该产业剥夺
了其基本工人的基本权利

,其中不成比例
的黑人是黑人,

同时使主要是
白人教练和行政人员的百万富翁成为百万富翁。

这种动态不仅剥夺了许多
年轻人接受有意义的教育,

它还使几代人的财富
从大多数黑人家庭转移,

并代表了
困扰我们社会的系统性不平等。

好消息是
人们开始看到真相。

NCAA 自己的公众民意

调查显示,惊人的
79% 的公众

认为大学把钱
放在运动员之前。

共和党和民主党的州和联邦立法者

也已经注意到并开始采取行动。

几位美国参议员正确地
将大学体育中的问题描述

为民权问题。

与此同时,
来自全国各地的大学生运动员

已经开始站出来要求
更大的健康和安全保护、

代表权、

对种族
和社会正义问题的关注

以及经济公平。

那些认为球员
应该只坚持运动的人

没有认识到
大学生运动员很少发表意见,

也忽视了
他们

在面对一个强大的行业时所冒的巨大个人风险,

尤其是没有任何代表。

更重要的是,
批评者没有

承认大学运动员
只是在寻求这个国家

几乎所有人都享有的权利,

以及根本
不应该受到质疑的基本保护。

我同意大学运动应该
是一种令人愉快的分心,

但当它们分散我们对它们所
带来的不公正的影响时则不然。

退休后

,NCAA 第一位也是任职时间最长的
执行董事沃尔特·拜尔斯(Walter Byers)

将大学体育描述为


今天的校园管理人员复活和祝福的种植园心态”。

这是
这个系统的设计者

和最了解它的人的一句话。

但你不必成为内部人士也

能认识到
对年轻人的剥削。

您不必
是共和党人或民主党人

,也会为不负责任的
支出或对

我们大学价值观的无视而烦恼。

您甚至不必成为体育迷。

你只需要相信
公平的基本理念

和高等教育的价值观。

因此,让我们要求所有大学运动员

都有机会
接受有意义的教育。

让我们要求
我们的大学负责任地支出

,公平分配产生的数
十亿美元。

让我们制定健全的
健康和安全标准,

以保护
那些用自己的身体取悦我们的人

并执行这些标准。

让我们为大学生运动员
提供一个有代表性的机构,

以便他们
在出现问题时有追索权,

并就如何纠正问题发表意见

最后,让
我们迎接我们这个时代的挑战

,一劳永逸地纠正适用于大学体育及其他领域

的持续存在的种族
和经济不平等

改变早就应该改变了,

但从来没有
比现在更好的时机。