Comics belong in the classroom Gene Luen Yang

When I was in the fifth grade,

I bought an issue
of “DC Comics Presents #57”

off of a spinner rack
at my local bookstore,

and that comic book changed my life.

The combination of words and pictures
did something inside my head

that had never been done before,

and I immediately fell in love
with the medium of comics.

I became a voracious comic book reader,

but I never brought them to school.

Instinctively, I knew that comic books
didn’t belong in the classroom.

My parents definitely were not fans,

and I was certain that my teachers
wouldn’t be either.

After all, they never used them to teach,

comic books and graphic novels were never
allowed during silent sustained reading,

and they were never sold
at our annual book fair.

Even so, I kept reading comics,

and I even started making them.

Eventually I became
a published cartoonist,

writing and drawing
comic books for a living.

I also became a high school teacher.

This is where I taught:

Bishop O’Dowd High School
in Oakland, California.

I taught a little bit of math
and a little bit of art,

but mostly computer science,

and I was there for 17 years.

When I was a brand new teacher,

I tried bringing comic books
into my classroom.

I remember telling my students
on the first day of every class

that I was also a cartoonist.

It wasn’t so much that I was planning
to teach them with comics,

it was more that I was hoping comics
would make them think that I was cool.

(Laughter)

I was wrong.

This was the ’90s,

so comic books didn’t have
the cultural cachet that they do today.

My students didn’t think I was cool.
They thought I was kind of a dork.

And even worse,
when stuff got hard in my class,

they would use comic books
as a way of distracting me.

They would raise their hands
and ask me questions like,

“Mr. Yang, who do you think
would win in a fight,

Superman or the Hulk?”

(Laughter)

I very quickly realized I had to keep
my teaching and my cartooning separate.

It seemed like my instincts
in fifth grade were correct.

Comic books didn’t belong
in the classroom.

But again, I was wrong.

A few years into my teaching career,

I learned firsthand
the educational potential of comics.

One semester, I was asked to sub
for this Algebra 2 class.

I was asked to long-term sub it,
and I said yes, but there was a problem.

At the time, I was also
the school’s educational technologist,

which meant every couple of weeks

I had to miss one or two periods
of this Algebra 2 class

because I was in another classroom
helping another teacher

with a computer-related activity.

For these Algebra 2 students,
that was terrible.

I mean, having a long-term
sub is bad enough,

but having a sub for your sub?
That’s the worst.

In an effort to provide some sort
of consistency for my students,

I began videotaping
myself giving lectures.

I’d then give these videos to my sub
to play for my students.

I tried to make these videos
as engaging as possible.

I even included
these little special effects.

For instance, after I finished
a problem on the board,

I’d clap my hands,

and the board would magically erase.

(Laughter)

I thought it was pretty awesome.

I was pretty certain
that my students would love it,

but I was wrong.

(Laughter)

These video lectures were a disaster.

I had students coming up to me
and saying things like,

“Mr. Yang, we thought
you were boring in person,

but on video, you are just unbearable.”

(Laughter)

So as a desperate second attempt,
I began drawing these lectures as comics.

I’d do these very quickly
with very little planning.

I’d just take a sharpie,
draw one panel after the other,

figuring out what I wanted
to say as I went.

These comics lectures would come out

to anywhere between
four and six pages long,

I’d xerox these, give them to my sub
to hand to my students.

And much to my surprise,

these comics lectures were a hit.

My students would ask me
to make these for them

even when I could be there in person.

It was like they liked cartoon me
more than actual me.

(Laughter)

This surprised me, because my students
are part of a generation

that was raised on screens,

so I thought for sure they would like
learning from a screen

better than learning from a page.

But when I talked to my students

about why they liked
these comics lectures so much,

I began to understand
the educational potential of comics.

First, unlike their math textbooks,

these comics lectures taught visually.

Our students grow up in a visual culture,

so they’re used to taking in
information that way.

But unlike other visual narratives,

like film or television
or animation or video,

comics are what I call permanent.

In a comic, past, present and future
all sit side by side on the same page.

This means that the rate
of information flow

is firmly in the hands of the reader.

When my students didn’t understand
something in my comics lecture,

they could just reread that passage
as quickly or as slowly as they needed.

It was like I was giving them
a remote control over the information.

The same was not true
of my video lectures,

and it wasn’t even true
of my in-person lectures.

When I speak, I deliver the information
as quickly or slowly as I want.

So for certain students
and certain kinds of information,

these two aspects of the comics medium,
its visual nature and its permanence,

make it an incredibly powerful
educational tool.

When I was teaching this Algebra 2 class,

I was also working on my master’s
in education at Cal State East Bay.

And I was so intrigued by this experience
that I had with these comics lectures

that I decided to focus
my final master’s project on comics.

I wanted to figure out
why American educators

have historically been so reluctant
to use comic books in their classrooms.

Here’s what I discovered.

Comic books first became
a mass medium in the 1940s,

with millions of copies
selling every month,

and educators back then took notice.

A lot of innovative teachers began
bringing comics into their classrooms

to experiment.

In 1944, the “Journal
of Educational Sociology”

even devoted an entire issue
to this topic.

Things seemed to be progressing.

Teachers were starting
to figure things out.

But then along comes this guy.

This is child psychologist
Dr. Fredric Wertham,

and in 1954, he wrote a book
called “Seduction of the Innocent,”

where he argues that comic books
cause juvenile delinquency.

(Laughter)

He was wrong.

Now, Dr. Wertham was actually
a pretty decent guy.

He spent most of his career
working with juvenile delinquents,

and in his work he noticed
that most of his clients read comic books.

What Dr. Wertham failed to realize
was in the 1940s and ’50s,

almost every kid in America
read comic books.

Dr. Wertham does a pretty
dubious job of proving his case,

but his book does inspire
the Senate of the United States

to hold a series of hearings

to see if in fact comic books
caused juvenile delinquency.

These hearings lasted
for almost two months.

They ended inconclusively,
but not before doing tremendous damage

to the reputation of comic books
in the eyes of the American public.

After this, respectable American
educators all backed away,

and they stayed away for decades.

It wasn’t until the 1970s

that a few brave souls
started making their way back in.

And it really wasn’t
until pretty recently,

maybe the last decade or so,

that comics have seen
more widespread acceptance

among American educators.

Comic books and graphic novels
are now finally making their way

back into American classrooms

and this is even happening
at Bishop O’Dowd, where I used to teach.

Mr. Smith, one of my former colleagues,

uses Scott McCloud’s
“Understanding Comics”

in his literature and film class,
because that book gives his students

the language with which to discuss
the relationship between words and images.

Mr. Burns assigns a comics essay
to his students every year.

By asking his students
to process a prose novel using images,

Mr. Burns asks them to think deeply

not just about the story

but also about how that story is told.

And Ms. Murrock uses
my own “American Born Chinese”

with her English 1 students.

For her, graphic novels

are a great way of fulfilling
a Common Core Standard.

The Standard states that students
ought to be able to analyze

how visual elements contribute
to the meaning, tone and beauty of a text.

Over in the library, Ms. Counts
has built a pretty impressive

graphic novel collection
for Bishop O’Dowd.

Now, Ms. Counts and all
of her librarian colleagues

have really been at the forefront
of comics advocacy,

really since the early ’80s,
when a school library journal article

stated that the mere presence
of graphic novels in the library

increased usage by about 80 percent

and increased the circulation
of noncomics material

by about 30 percent.

Inspired by this renewed interest
from American educators,

American cartoonists are now producing
more explicitly educational content

for the K-12 market than ever before.

A lot of this is directed
at language arts,

but more and more comics
and graphic novels

are starting to tackle
math and science topics.

STEM comics graphics novels
really are like this uncharted territory,

ready to be explored.

America is finally waking up to the fact

that comic books
do not cause juvenile delinquency.

(Laughter)

That they really do belong
in every educator’s toolkit.

There’s no good reason
to keep comic books and graphic novels

out of K-12 education.

They teach visually,

they give our students
that remote control.

The educational potential is there

just waiting to be tapped

by creative people like you.

Thank you.

(Applause)

五年级时,我在当地书店的旋转架上

买了一
期“DC Comics Presents #57”

,那本漫画书改变了我的生活。

文字和图片的结合
在我的脑海里做了一些

以前从未做过的事情

,我立刻爱上
了漫画这个媒介。

我成了一个贪婪的漫画书阅读者,

但我从来没有把他们带到学校。

本能地,我知道漫画书
不属于教室。

我的父母绝对不是粉丝

,我确信我的老师
也不会。

毕竟,他们从来没有用它们来教书,

漫画书和图画小说
在默读期间是不允许的,

而且它们也从未
在我们的年度书展上出售过。

尽管如此,我还是继续看漫画,

甚至开始制作漫画。

最终我成为
了一名出版漫画家,以

写作和绘画
漫画书为生。

我也成为了一名高中老师。

这是我教书的地方:

加利福尼亚州奥克兰的奥多德主教高中。

我教了一点数学
和一点艺术,

但主要是计算机科学

,我在那里呆了 17 年。

当我还是一名全新的老师时,

我尝试将漫画书
带入我的教室。

我记得
在每节课的第一天告诉我的学生

我也是一名漫画家。

与其说我打算
用漫画教他们

,更多的是我希望漫画
能让他们觉得我很酷。

(笑声)

我错了。

那是 90 年代,

所以漫画书
没有今天的文化声望。

我的学生不认为我很酷。
他们认为我是个笨蛋。

更糟糕的是,
当我的课变得困难时,

他们会用漫画
书来分散我的注意力。

他们会
举手问我诸如

“杨先生,你认为
谁会在战斗中获胜,

超人还是绿巨人?”

(笑声)

我很快意识到我必须把
我的教学和我的漫画分开。

看来我
五年级的直觉是正确的。

漫画书不
属于教室。

但是,我又错了。

在我的教学生涯中,

我亲身体验
了漫画的教育潜力。

一个学期,我被要求参加
代数 2 课。

我被要求长期分
,我说可以,但是有问题。

当时,我
还是学校的教育技术专家,

这意味着每隔几周

我就不得不错过一两
节代数 2 课,

因为我在另一个教室
帮助另一位老师进行

与计算机相关的活动。

对于这些代数 2 的学生来说,
这太可怕了。

我的意思是,拥有一个长期的
潜艇已经够糟糕了,

但是你的潜艇有一个潜艇?
那是最糟糕的。

为了
给我的学生提供某种一致性,

我开始录制
自己的演讲视频。

然后,我会将这些视频提供给我的潜艇
供我的学生播放。

我试图让这些视频
尽可能吸引人。

我什至包括了
这些小特效。

例如,当我
在黑板上完成一个问题后,

我会拍手

,黑板会神奇地擦除。

(笑声)

我觉得这太棒了。

我很
确定我的学生会喜欢它,

但我错了。

(笑声)

这些视频讲座是一场灾难。

有学生过来对
我说,

“杨老师,我们觉得
你当面很无聊,

但在视频上,你简直无法忍受。”

(笑声)

所以作为绝望的第二次尝试,
我开始把这些讲座画成漫画。

我会在
很少计划的情况下很快完成这些工作。

我只是拿个记号笔,一个接一个地
画一个面板,一边走一边

弄清楚我想说什么

这些漫画讲座会出现

在四到六页之间的任何地方

我会复印这些,把它们交给我的潜艇
交给我的学生。

令我惊讶的是,

这些漫画讲座很受欢迎。 即使

我可以亲自到场,我的学生也会要求我
为他们制作这些

就好像他们更喜欢卡通我
而不是真实的我。

(笑声)

这让我很惊讶,因为我的学生

在屏幕上长大的那一代人,

所以我确信他们更愿意
从屏幕上

学习而不是从页面上学习。

但是当我和我的学生

谈论他们为什么
如此喜欢这些漫画讲座时,

我开始理解
漫画的教育潜力。

首先,与他们的数学教科书不同,

这些漫画讲座是视觉教学的。

我们的学生在视觉文化中长大,

因此他们习惯于以
这种方式获取信息。

但与

电影、电视
、动画或视频等其他视觉叙事不同,

我称之为永久的漫画。

在漫画中,过去、现在和未来
都并排坐在同一页上。

这意味着
信息流的

速度牢牢掌握在读者手中。

当我的学生
在我的漫画讲座中不理解某些内容时,

他们可以
根据需要尽快或慢速地重读那篇文章。

就像我在给
他们远程控制信息一样。

我的视频讲座

不是这样
,甚至我的面对面讲座也不是这样。

当我说话时,
我会根据自己的意愿或快或慢地传递信息。

所以对于某些学生
和某些类型的信息,

漫画媒体的这两个方面,
它的视觉性质和它的持久性,

使它成为一个非常强大的
教育工具。

当我教这门代数 2 课时,


还在加州州立大学东湾分校攻读教育硕士学位。

我对这些漫画讲座的经历非常感兴趣,

所以我决定将
我的最终硕士项目集中在漫画上。

我想弄清楚
为什么美国教育工作者

历来如此不愿意
在课堂上使用漫画书。

这是我发现的。

漫画书
在 1940 年代首次成为大众媒体,每月销售

数百万册

当时的教育工作者注意到了这一点。

许多创新型教师开始
将漫画带入课堂

进行实验。

1944年,《
教育社会学杂志》

甚至用一整期
来讨论这个话题。

事情似乎有了进展。

老师们开始
想办法了。

但随之而来的是这个人。

这是儿童心理学家
Fredric Wertham 博士

,他在 1954 年写了一本
名为《诱惑无辜者》的书

,他认为漫画书
会导致青少年犯罪。

(笑声)

他错了。

现在,Wertham 博士实际上是
一个相当正派的人。

他的大部分职业生涯都
在与少年犯打交道

,在他的工作中,他注意到他的
大多数客户都阅读漫画书。

韦瑟姆博士没有意识到的
是,在 1940 年代和 50 年代,

美国几乎每个孩子都
阅读漫画书。

韦瑟姆博士
在证明他的案子方面做得相当可疑,

但他的书确实激发
了美国参议院

举行一系列听证

会,看看漫画书是否真的
导致了青少年犯罪。

这些听证会持续
了将近两个月。

它们以不确定的方式结束,
但在这之前

对漫画书
在美国公众眼中的声誉造成了巨大损害。

此后,受人尊敬的美国
教育家们都退缩了

,他们离开了几十年。

直到 1970 年代

,一些勇敢的灵魂
才开始回归。

直到最近,

也许是最近十年左右

,漫画才在美国教育工作者中得到
更广泛的接受

漫画书和图画小说
现在终于

回到了美国的课堂

,这甚至发生
在我曾经任教的奥多德主教。

我以前的一位同事史密斯先生在他的文学和电影课上

使用了斯科特·麦克克劳德的
“理解漫画”


因为这本书为他的学生提供了

讨论文字和图像之间关系的语言。

伯恩斯先生
每年都会给他的学生分配一篇漫画文章。

通过要求他的学生
使用图像处理散文小说,

伯恩斯先生要求他们不仅要深入

思考故事

,还要思考故事的讲述方式。

默罗克女士和她的英语 1 学生一起使用
我自己的“美国出生的中国人”

对她来说,图画小说


实现共同核心标准的好方法。

该标准规定,学生
应该能够分析

视觉元素如何
影响文本的意义、语气和美感。

在图书馆里,Counts 女士为奥多德主教(Bishop O’Dowd)
制作了一个令人印象深刻的

图画小说
集。

现在,Counts 女士和
她所有的图书管理员

同事真的站在
了漫画宣传的最前沿,

真的是自 80 年代初以来,
当时学校图书馆期刊的一篇文章

指出,图书馆中仅仅
存在图画小说就

增加了大约 80 的使用量 %

,并将非漫画材料的发行量增加了

约 30%。

受到美国教育工作者重新产生兴趣的启发

美国漫画家现在正在

为 K-12 市场制作比以往任何时候都更加明确的教育内容。

其中很多都是
针对语言艺术的,

但越来越多的漫画
和图画

小说开始涉及
数学和科学主题。

STEM 漫画图形小说
真的就像这个未知的领域,

随时可以探索。

美国终于

意识到漫画书
不会导致青少年犯罪这一事实。

(笑声

) 他们确实
属于每个教育工作者的工具包。

没有充分的
理由将漫画书和图画小说

排除在 K-12 教育之外。

他们以视觉方式教学,

他们为我们的学生
提供远程控制。

教育潜力

正等待着

像你这样有创造力的人来挖掘。

谢谢你。

(掌声)