Connecting Charitable Intent with the Needs of Communities

so

at newark academy we have an immersion

requirement where we’re asked to immerse

ourselves in another community

ask to create a better sense of the

world around us

now one of these opportunities is to go

on a service immersion

where you would go and do service in

predominantly developing nations

one of the things that you could do was

use a private program

and i saw trips to fiji to morocco

to nepal to costa rica really anywhere

that i could have thought of

yet as i was as i was looking into these

programs i came upon a negative review

somebody who said that they didn’t

really feel like their service did

anything

when i looked further into this i came

upon a common phenomenon

which some people like to call

voluntourism

now let’s look at a specific example

with orphanage community service

so a phenomenon that exists is that a

kidnapper in a developing nation will go

out and they will kidnap children

and then force them to pretend to be

orphans at that point a western service

organization will come in

they will work at this pretend orphanage

they will pay

the orphanage runner and the kidnapper

thus will profit

now when i first read about this i felt

powerless

i mean my intent was good my intent was

to do service to help out

kids who were living in that orphanage

yet my charitable intent was turned into

an exploitative measure

something that caused a phenomenon such

as the kidnapping of children in a

developing nation

so that’s when i first saw this crucial

gap

in our community service programming

being the divide between

intent and impact in community service

when we go into service we have

incredible intent

we want to do some good in the world we

want to help out

to mitigate income inequality or to

raise standard of living

yet often the programs that we’re using

the services that we take part in

are not matching our intent with its

impact

now it’s important to mention that this

is not an all-encompassing phenomenon

there are really good service programs

out there that will match your intent

with its impact

that will help and make the world a

better place

it’s the ones that don’t do that however

that are problematic

my goal throughout this presentation is

to help you to find those good programs

by the end of this i hope that you have

a toolkit to look to do research

and to find the good service

organizations to help you

achieve your service goals

now within this divide let’s look at two

examples

one who handles it well and one who

handles it poorly

we’re going to look at an organization

which shows you exactly how your intent

is found in its impact

and we’ll look at one who obscures that

so when i was first coming about this i

had an immediate question being

shouldn’t this be easier i mean in the

age of technology i can post a video

online and it will get

views from several different countries

in the same vein i can send my dollar

anywhere

so i’m thus no longer geographically

restricted in my community service

the follow-up question to that however

is whether because of this ease

and this access whether we’re doing our

research

are we actually looking into the

programs that we’re sending our money to

or is it so easy that we’re not doing

that work

so now for the examples let’s talk about

microfinance

the microfinance movement was

predominantly popular in 2007 and 2008

but it still exists all around the world

this movement is essentially said that

banks or privatized organizations in the

developing world

would set up what are called mfis or

microfinancing institutions

these mfis would then give out

incredibly small

loans to people in the developing nation

often

sponsored by your dollar that loan would

then be used to set up a business

at which point the person in the

developing nation could receive a

stream of income they could pay back the

loan and eventually the mfi would even

pay back the donor

so this is a flawless model right i mean

not only are you

letting somebody set up a business and

have lasting revenue rather than the

impact of just one donation

but you’re also going to eventually get

some part of your money back

well the problem with this comes when

you look at the fine print

it’s incredibly common for there to be

very high interest rates

on these micro credits and very short

buyback periods

these mfis also have an incredibly

common practice

in which they’ll group people together

which they say creates accountability

but also increases difficulties of

communication

with all the said and done it’s

incredibly common for people not to be

able to pay back their micro credits

actually creating debt recent data has

shown that

30 percent of micro credits taken out in

the developing world

we’re actually not used to create

businesses

but rather taken out to repay micro

debts

from other mfis

so how does this happen i mean when i

donate to an mfi

i have charitable intent i want to make

good

in the world however my charitable

intent

is then obscured and turned into an

exploitative measure something that can

create debt cycles

well the most common phenomenon that i

found that leads to something like this

is lack of research the question that i

have for you

is if people were truly doing their

research if people

looked into these micro credit programs

before they actually sent their money

away would they even exist in the first

place

people do service to be charitable so my

guess would be no

so let’s look at another organization

one who

minimizes this gap one who matches your

intent with its impact this

is the prasad project the prasad project

is an ngo or a non-governmental

organization

which functions to help out in the

developing world in several different

ways they create

project groups from whether it be a

self-help group for women

to increased access to healthcare

the important thing however that

connects to this idea

is that they’re incredibly transparent

about their practices and about where

your dollar is going

they have published financial statistics

which show you that they have

high project fundraising and that very

little of their money goes to

toward administrative or fundraising

costs but further than that their

project-based system

shows you exactly where your dollar is

going and how it’s being used

you’re able to literally see the impact

which is incredibly important if you

want to match your intent to it

they show you exactly how your

charitable intent

is found in the needs of the developing

world which is what we want

we want to see our intent matched with

its impact

that’s crucial within community service

we go into service to be charitable it

would be a bad thing

if our actions weren’t charitable in

nature

so now that we’ve established this

disconnect between

charitable intent and its impact in the

developing world

let’s go into two modern phenomenon

which i believe

have been broadening this gap two

phenomenon which have been making it

so that more and more our intent is

obscured from its impact

the first of which being technology as i

talked about in the beginning of this

presentation

it’s incredibly easy for me to donate

being that i would just have to go to a

website

put in my credit card information click

a button and the money would be gone

the question that follows up to that

however is whether we’re doing our

research

whether it’s so easy to donate that

people are not doing the work they need

to make sure that the programs that

they’re donating to

are doing good now further than that

often our online community service

programs look like

shopping retailers they look like amazon

i can send off my money and i click the

donate button

and it looks just like a pay button

i mean there’s been incredible data

that’s shown that you get a quick

dopamine shot when you click

when you click the buy button on a

website like amazon in fact a greater

dopamine shot

than that than that that you get when

the package actually arrives

so the follow-up question is shouldn’t

community service function that same way

if our community service websites look

so much like on online retailers

shouldn’t we get that same dopamine shot

now let’s look at two online service

programs

one who i think does it well and one who

obscures our intent

so this is feeding america feeding

america is a organization which works to

end hunger and homelessness in america

when you look at the website first you

see the big learn more button

that’s the biggest button on the screen

so it’s immediately asking you

to do your research it’s asking you to

look more

into the organization you’ll see also up

top that there’s a find a food bank

button

which not only gives you the uh so it

not only gives you the opportunity to

donate your money

but it also gives the op you the

opportunity to donate your time

finally at the top of the screen you see

the small red button that says donate

this of course should be there we want

people to donate but it’s small

and is first asking you to do the

research

this means that when the average person

comes upon this website

the first instinct will not be to go

straight to the donate button

but they will first actually go to do

the research

on the organization and this and to

decide whether it’s practically matching

their

intent with its impact

now let’s look at this online service

website

what we see is an incredibly saddening

image of a immigrant from idlib syria

followed by the ask for a donation

now i should preface this by saying that

we want people to donate

having more donations is not a bad thing

but we should be asking people

to likewise do their research on this

website

you would actually need to click out of

the donate button

to actually see what the organization is

doing

there is no practical information on how

they’re spending your money

how they’re helping families fleeing

from idlib syria

all you’re presented with is a saddening

image followed by the option to

insert your credit card information or

your paypal and send your money right

away

we want people to donate but we want

them to do their research

to make sure that their intent is

matched with its impact

so we can thus see why technology is

broadening the gap

now another thing that’s broadening this

gap in my opinion is that of

globalization

we can do service anywhere nowadays we

are no longer geographically

restricted not only because of online

service but because we can physically

travel across the world

this can be good and bad so i’m going to

use the example of house building but

this

applies to much beyond just house

building community

so let’s take two scenarios first

scenario

say that i am a well-established

construction man

who has much experience building houses

and knows what they’re doing

i go to a developing nation i build

houses

and then eventually i have to leave i’m

not able to actually

see the impact of those houses but i

know that with my construction abilities

the houses will stand up and they will

function properly because i’ve built

so many beforehand now say that i’m

me i’m a 17 year old high school student

who has no experience building any

houses

i go into the developing nation i do my

best attempt at building houses and then

i leave

i’m not able to see the impact of those

houses

and likewise i have no skills to back up

on

i have no skills that i can rely on to

know that my service was impactful

those houses could have fallen over for

all i have known they could have been

non-helpful in any way i have no way of

knowing

because i’m already back home it’s in

this way

that our international service is

incredibly skill dependent

it’s incredibly important that we have

the skills to back up our service

because if we don’t we can’t see whether

our service

actually had the impact that we wanted

when we don’t have the skills to rely on

it could be that our service is not

matching our intent that the impact is

actually

lessening the standard of living in this

in the developing community

but we wouldn’t know

so one more trap let’s talk about

buzzwords

buzzwords are terms that make you more

likely to donate because they’re

incredibly topical

or prominent in today’s society we saw

it on the on one of the

online service programs that i mentioned

before where it talked about fleeing

refugees

another is koved when we see words like

refugee or covid or anything that is

pressing to the moment now

we’re more likely to donate and this is

a good thing we should want people to

donate to topical service opportunities

being that they’re the most pressing and

the most necessary right now

we do have to make sure however that

when we see a buzzword

we still do our research we shouldn’t

see a community service organization

that says that they’re donating to

covet-based things and just

automatically send our money away

we should look into the organization see

what they’re doing

see how their practices are working look

at their financial transparency

and then make our decision to donate

don’t

look at a buzzword and send your money

away do the practical background

research

so now that we’ve established the

phenomenon why it’s broadening

let’s talk about what you can do about

it first

as you could probably have told for the

from this entire presentation

research research is incredibly

important in community service

being that it’s how we know that our

impact is matched by

our intent research is the

only way for us to see whether our

community service is

actually having the impact that we want

it to have

i implore you research the organizations

that you’re working with

research what they’re doing how they’re

doing it look at

their fundraising costs look at their

administrative costs

see whether what you want to happen is

what they’re actually doing

another thing to do is to look for traps

look to see whether they have any

published financial statistics

look to see whether it looks easy

whether the service

looks like you’re going to get it done

and over with very

quickly obviously none of these are

reasons not to do the service

there’s simply reasons to be on high

alert

take notice you could be right

now finally it’s incredibly important to

say that this is

all in your hands your service is your

property and you can do with it as you

please

you’re the one that has to do the

research you’re the one that has to look

into your service organizations

service is crucial in our world service

is what makes this world a better place

services how we can use our privilege to

better the world around us

it’s really important however that we

take that service

and we put it to good and we make sure

that our service is matching our intent

you can take back your community service

do the research

it’s in your hands thank you so much

所以

在纽瓦克学院,我们有一个沉浸式

要求,我们被要求沉浸

在另一个社区中

要求更好地了解

我们周围的世界,

现在其中一个机会是

进行服务沉浸

式,你会去那里做服务 在

主要是发展中国家

,您可以做的一件事是

使用私人计划

,我看到了前往斐济到摩洛哥

到尼泊尔到哥斯达黎加的旅行,真的

是我能想到的任何地方,

因为我当时正在研究这些

计划我 遇到负面评论

有人说他们

真的觉得他们的服务没有做

任何事情,

当我进一步调查时,我发现

了一个普遍现象

,有些人喜欢称之为

志愿旅游

现在让我们看一个

孤儿院社区服务的具体例子

所以存在的一种现象是,

一个发展中国家的绑架者会

出去,他们会绑架孩子

,然后强迫他们

在那个地点假装成孤儿 nt 一个西方服务

组织会进来

他们将在这个假装的孤儿院工作

他们会付钱

给孤儿院的跑者和绑架者

因此

现在当我第一次读到这个时我感到

无能为力

我的意思是我的意图是好的 我的意图是

为 帮助

住在那个孤儿院的孩子,

但我的慈善意图变成了

一种剥削措施

,这导致了诸如在发展中国家绑架儿童之类的现象,

所以那是我第一次看到

我们社区服务计划

中的这个关键差距是 区分

社区服务的意图和影响

当我们投入服务时 我们有

难以置信的意图

我们想在世界上做一些好事 我们

帮助减轻收入不平等或

提高生活水平

但通常是我们正在使用的计划

我们参与的服务

与我们的意图与其影响不匹配

现在重要的是要提到这

不是一个包罗万象的 现象

确实有很好的服务

计划可以将您的意图

与其影响

相匹配,这将有助于并使世界

变得更美好

这是那些不这样做的人,但是

这是有问题的,

我在整个演示文稿中的目标

是帮助您

在本文结束时找到那些好的程序我希望你有

一个工具包来进行研究

并找到好的服务

组织来帮助你

在这个鸿沟中实现你的服务目标让我们看两个

例子,

一个处理得很好, 一个

处理不好

的组织,我们将研究一个组织

,它可以准确地向您展示您的意图

在其影响中是如何被发现的

,我们将研究一个掩盖这一点的组织,

所以当我第一次谈到这个时,我

有一个直接的问题是

这不应该更容易吗?我的意思是在

技术时代我可以在线发布视频

,它会以同样的方式获得

来自几个不同国家的观点

我可以将我的美元发送到

任何地方,

所以我没有

在我的社区服务中受地域限制的时间更长

,但是,后续问题

是,是否因为这种便利性

和这种访问权,我们是否正在做我们的研究,我们是否真的在

调查

我们正在向其汇款的项目,

或者是否如此 很容易我们不做

这项工作,

所以现在举个例子,让我们谈谈

小额信贷

小额信贷运动

在 2007 年和 2008 年主要流行,

但它仍然存在于世界各地,

这一运动基本上被称为发展中国家的

银行或私有化组织

会建立所谓的

小额信贷机构或小额信贷机构,这些小额信贷机构

向发展中国家的人们发放难以置信的小额贷款,这些贷款

通常

由你的美元赞助,然后这些贷款

将用于在

发展中国家开展业务 可以获得一笔

收入,他们可以偿还

贷款,最终小额信贷机构甚至会

偿还捐助者,

所以这 是一个完美的模式,对我的意思

是,你不仅

让某人建立业务并

获得持久的收入,而不是

仅仅一次捐赠的影响,

而且你最终也会很好地

收回部分资金

,问题来了 当

您查看细则时,这些小额

信贷的

利率非常高

且回购期非常短,这些小额信贷

机构也有一种非常

普遍的

做法,他们将人们聚集在一起

,他们说这会产生责任感,

但也 增加了

沟通的难度

人们

无法偿还他们的小额信贷

实际上是在创造债务,这是非常普遍的现象 最近的数据

表明,

我们实际上没有使用发展中国家 30% 的小额信贷 创造

企业

,而是拿出来

偿还其他小额信贷机构的小额债务,

所以这是怎么发生的

慈善意图我想

在世界上有所作为,但是我的慈善

意图随后被掩盖并变成了一种

剥削性措施,可以

很好地造成债务周期我发现导致这种情况的最常见现象

是缺乏研究问题 我

要告诉你的

是,如果人们真的在做他们的

研究,如果人们

在他们实际汇款之前调查这些小额信贷计划,

他们是否会首先存在

人们为慈善而服务所以我的

猜测不会,

所以让我们看看 在另一个组织

将这种差距最小化 将您的

意图与其影响相匹配的组织 这

就是 prasad 项目 prasad 项目

是一个非政府组织或非政府

组织

,它

以几种不同的

方式在发展中国家提供帮助 他们创建

项目组 从是否

成为女性自助团体

到增加获得医疗保健的机会,

重要的

是 与这个想法相关的

是,他们

对自己的做法以及

您的资金流向非常透明,

他们发布了财务统计数据

,显示他们的

项目筹款额很高,而且

他们的钱很少

用于行政或筹款

成本,但是 更重要的是,他们

基于项目的系统

向您显示您的美元的确切

去向以及它是如何使用的,

您可以从字面上看到影响

,如果您

想将您的意图与它相匹配,这是非常重要的,

他们向您展示了您的

慈善事业 意图

是在发展中国家的需求中发现的,

这就是

我们希望看到的我们的意图与其影响相匹配,

这在社区服务

中至关重要 在

自然界中

,既然我们已经确定

慈善意图与其对

发展中国家的影响之间的这种脱节,

让我们进入两个 m

我认为现代现象

一直在扩大这种差距 两种

现象一直在

使我们的意图越来越

被其影响

所掩盖,其中第一个是技术,正如我

在本演示文稿开始时谈到的那样,这

对我来说非常容易

捐赠因为我只需要去一个

网站输入我的信用卡信息点击

一个按钮然后钱就会消失

接下来的

问题是我们是否正在做我们的

研究

是否如此容易捐赠

人们没有做他们需要的工作

来确保

他们捐赠的项目现在做得更好

我们的在线社区服务

项目看起来像

购物零售商 他们看起来像亚马逊

我可以寄出我的钱,我 点击

捐赠按钮

,它看起来就像一个支付按钮

像亚马逊这样的网站上的购买按钮实际上

比包裹实际到达时获得的多巴胺释放量更大,

因此后续问题是

,如果我们的社区服务网站看起来如此多,那么社区服务功能是否应该以同样的方式发挥作用

就像在线零售商一样,

我们现在不应该得到同样的多巴胺注射

吗?让我们看看两个在线服务

计划,

一个我认为做得很好,一个

掩盖了我们的意图,

所以这是养活美国,养活

美国是一个致力于

消除饥饿和 美国的无家可归者

当您首先查看网站时,您会

看到大的“了解更多”按钮

,这是屏幕上最大的按钮,

因此它会立即要求

您进行研究,它要求您

更多

地了解您将在顶部看到的组织

有一个寻找食物银行的

按钮

,它不仅给你呃,所以它

不仅让你有机会

捐赠你的钱,

而且它也让你有

机会d

最后在屏幕顶部你会看到

一个红色的小按钮,上面写着捐赠

这个当然应该在那里我们希望

人们捐赠但它很小

而且首先要求你做

研究

这意味着当普通人

来的时候 在这个网站

上,第一个直觉不会是

直接点击捐赠按钮,

而是他们会首先真正去

研究这个组织和这个,并

决定它是否实际上符合

他们的

意图和它的影响

现在让我们看看这个在线服务

网站

我们看到的是一个令人难以置信的令人

悲伤的形象,一个来自叙利亚伊德利卜的移民,

然后是请求

捐款 同样在这个网站上做他们的研究

你实际上需要

点击捐赠按钮

才能真正看到该组织在

什么 关于

他们如何花费你的钱

他们如何帮助

逃离叙利亚伊德利卜的家庭的形成

你所看到的只是一个令人悲伤的

图像,然后是

插入你的信用卡信息或

你的贝宝并立即汇款的选项,

我们想要 人们捐赠,但我们希望

他们进行研究

,以确保他们的意图

与其影响相匹配,

因此我们可以看到为什么现在技术正在

扩大

差距,在我看来,另一件事正在扩大差距,那就是

我们可以做的全球化 现在

我们不再受地域

限制,不仅因为在线

服务,而且因为我们可以

在世界各地旅行,

这可能是好是坏,所以我将

使用房屋建筑的例子,

但这不仅适用于房屋

建设社区

所以让我们看两个场景第一个

场景

说我是一个成熟的

建筑人

,他有很多建造房屋的经验

并且知道什么 他们正在做

我去一个发展中国家 我建造

房屋

然后最终我不得不离开 我

无法真正

看到这些房屋的影响,但我

知道以我的建造能力,

这些房屋将站起来并且它们将

发挥作用 正确,因为我之前已经建造了

这么多现在说我是

我我是一个 17 岁的高中生

,没有建造任何

房屋的经验

我进入发展中国家我尽我

最大的努力建造房屋然后

我 离开

我看不到那些房子的影响

,同样我没有技能可以支持

我没有技能可以依靠

我知道我的服务是有影响力的

他们可能

以任何方式都没有帮助,我无法

知道,

因为我已经回家了,

因此我们的国际服务

非常依赖于技能

,我们拥有

支持我们服务的技能非常重要,

因为如果 星期三

当我们没有能力依赖

它时,我们是否看不到我们的服务

是否真的产生了我们想要的影响

在这个发展中的社区,

但我们不会知道,

所以还有一个陷阱让我们谈谈

流行语

流行语是让你更有

可能捐赠的术语,因为它们

在当今社会中具有令人难以置信的话题性或突出性,我们

在其中一个上看到了它

我之前提到的在线服务项目,

其中提到了逃离

难民,

当我们看到诸如

难民或 covid 之类的词或任何

目前紧迫的词时,

我们更可能捐款,这是

一件好事,我们应该希望人们

捐赠给专题服务

机会,因为它们是目前最紧迫

和最必要的,

我们确实必须确保

当我们看到一个流行词时,

我们仍然会做我们不应该看到的研究

某个社区服务组织

说他们正在向

基于觊觎的东西捐款,只是

自动将我们的钱汇走,

我们应该调查该组织,

看看他们在做什么,

看看他们的做法是如何运作的,

看看他们的财务透明度

,然后让我们的 捐赠的决定

不要

看流行词,把你的钱寄出

去做实际的背景

研究,

所以现在我们已经确定了

为什么它正在扩大的现象,

让我们先谈谈你可以做些

什么,

因为你可能已经告诉了

从整个演示文稿中,

研究

在社区服务中非常重要,

因为它是我们知道我们的

影响与

我们的意图相匹配的

唯一方法 研究是我们了解我们的

社区服务是否

真的产生了我们想要的影响的唯一方法

我恳请您研究与

您合作的组织

研究他们在做什么 他们是如何

做的 看看

他们的筹款活动 成本 看看他们的

管理成本

看看你想发生的事情是

不是他们实际上正在做的事情

另一件事是寻找陷阱

看看他们是否有任何

公布的财务统计数据

看看看起来是否容易

服务是否

看起来 就像您将很快完成并完成它

显然这些

都不是不提供

服务的理由 只是保持高度

警惕的理由

注意您现在可能是

现在 最后 说这就是全部是非常重要的

在您手中您的服务是您的

财产,您可以随心所欲地使用它

您是必须进行

研究的人 您是必须

调查您的服务组织的人

服务在我们的世界中至关重要 服务

是什么 让这个世界变得更美好

服务 我们如何利用我们的特权来

改善我们周围的世界

这真的很重要,但是我们

接受这项服务

,我们把它做好,我们

确保我们的 服务符合我们的意图

你可以收回你的社区服务

做你手中的研究 非常感谢