A small country with big ideas to get rid of fossil fuels Monica Araya

How do we build a society

without fossil fuels?

This is a very complex challenge,

and I believe developing countries
could take the lead in this transition.

And I’m aware that this
is a contentious statement,

but the reality is that so much
is at stake in our countries

if we let fossil fuels stay
at the center of our development.

We can do it differently.

And it’s time, it really is time,

to debunk the myth

that a country has to choose
between development on the one hand

and environmental protection,
renewables, quality of life, on the other.

I come from Costa Rica,
a developing country.

We are nearly five million people,

and we live right in the middle
of the Americas,

so it’s very easy
to remember where we live.

Nearly 100 percent of our electricity

comes from renewable sources,

five of them.

(Applause)

Hydropower, geothermal,

wind, solar, biomass.

Did you know that last year,

for 299 days,

we did not use any fossil fuels

in order to generate all our electricity?

It’s a fantastic achievement,

and yet, it hides a paradox,

which is that nearly 70 percent

of all our energy consumption is oil.

Why?

Because of our transportation system,

which is totally dependent
on fossil fuels,

like it is in most countries.

So if we think of the energy
transition as a marathon,

the question is, how do we get
to the finish line,

how do we decarbonize
the rest of the economy?

And it’s fair to say
that if we don’t succeed,

it’s difficult to see who will.

So that is why I want
to talk to you about Costa Rica,

because I believe we are a great candidate

in pioneering a vision
for development without fossil fuels.

If you know one thing about our country,

it’s that we don’t have an army.

So I’m going to take you back to 1948.

That year, the country
was coming out of civil war.

Thousands of Costa Ricans had died,

and families were bitterly split.

And yet, a surprising idea
won the hearts and minds:

we would reboot the country,

and that Second Republic
would have no army.

So we abolished it.

And the president at the time,

José Figueres,

found a powerful way
by smashing the walls of an army base.

The following year, 1949,

we made that decision permanent
in the new constitution,

and that is why I can tell you that story
nearly 70 years later.

And I’m grateful.

I’m grateful they made that decision
before I was born,

because it allowed me
and millions of others

to live in a very stable country.

And you might be thinking
that it was good luck,

but it wasn’t.

There was a pattern of deliberate choices.

In the ’40s, Costa Ricans were given
free education and free health care.

We called that social guarantees.

By abolishing the army,

we were able to turn military spending
into social spending,

and that was a driver of stability.

In the ’50s –

(Applause)

In the ’50s, we started
investing in hydropower,

and that kept us away from the trap

of using fossil fuels
for electricity generation,

which is what the world
is struggling with today.

In the ’70s we invested in national parks,

and that kept us away

from the deeply flawed logic
of growth, growth, growth at any cost

that you see others embracing,
especially in the developing world.

In the ’90s, we pioneered payments
for ecosystem services,

and that helped us reverse deforestation

and boosted ecotourism,
which today is a key engine of growth.

So investing in environmental protection

did not hurt our economy.

Quite the opposite.

And it doesn’t mean we are perfect,

and it doesn’t mean
we don’t have contradictions.

That’s not the point.

The point is that,
by making our own choices,

we were able to develop resilience
in dealing with development problems.

Also, if you take a country like ours,

the GDP per capita
is around 11,000 dollars,

depending on how you measure it.

But according to
the Social Progress Index,

we are an absolute outlier

when it comes to turning GDP
into social progress.

Abolishing the army,

investing in nature and people,

did something very powerful, too.

It shaped the narrative,

the narrative of a small country
with big ideas,

and it was very empowering
to grow up with that narrative.

So the question is,

what is the next big idea
for this generation?

And I believe what comes next

is for this generation
to let go of fossil fuels for good,

just as we did with the army.

Fossil fuels create climate change.

We know that,

and we know how vulnerable we are
to the impacts of climate change.

So as a developing country,
it is in our best interest

to build development without fossil fuels

that harm people in the first place.

Because

why would we continue importing oil

for transportation

if we can use electricity instead?

Remember,

this is the country

where electricity
comes from water in our rivers,

heat from volcanoes,

wind turbines, solar panels,

biowaste.

Abolishing fossil fuels means
disrupting our transportation system

so that we can power our cars,
buses and trains with electricity

instead of dirty energy.

And transportation, let me tell you,

has become an existential issue
for us Costa Ricans,

because the model we have
is not working for us.

It’s hurting people,

it’s hurting companies,

and it’s hurting our health.

Because when policies
and infrastructure fail,

this is what happens on a daily basis.

Two hours in the morning,

two hours in the evening.

I don’t understand why
we have to accept this as normal.

It’s offensive

to have to waste our time like this
every single day.

And this highway is actually quite good

compared to what you see
in other countries

where traffic is exploding.

You know, Costa Ricans call this “presa.”

Presa means “imprisoned.”

And people are turning violent

in a country that is otherwise
happy in pura vida.

It’s happening.

So a lot is at stake.

The good news

is that when we talk
about clean transportation

and different mobility,

we’re not talking about
some distant utopia out there.

We’re talking about electric mobility
that is happening today.

By 2022, electric cars
and conventional cars

are expected to cost the same,

and cities are already trying
electric buses.

And these really cool creatures

are saving money,

and they reduce pollution.

So if we want to get rid
of oil-based transportation, we can,

because we have options now
that we didn’t have before.

It’s really exciting.

But of course,

some get very uncomfortable
with this idea,

and they will come and they will tell you

that the world is stuck with oil,
and so is Costa Rica, so get real.

That’s what they tell you.

And you know what the answer
to that argument is?

That in 1948, we didn’t say
the world is stuck with armies,

so let’s keep our army, too.

No, we made a very brave choice,

and that choice made the whole difference.

So it’s time for this generation
to be brave again

and abolish fossil fuels for good.

And I’ll give you three reasons
why we have to do this.

First,

our model of transportation
and urbanization is broken,

so this is the best moment
to redefine our urban and mobility future.

We don’t want cities
that are built for cars.

We want cities for people

where we can walk and we can use bikes.

And we want public transportation,

lots of it,

public transportation
that is clean and dignifying.

Because if we continue
adding fleets of conventional cars,

our cities will become unbearable.

Second, we have to change,

but incremental change
is not going to be sufficient.

We need transformational change.

And there are some
incremental projects in my country,

and I am the first one to celebrate them.

But let’s not kid ourselves.

We’re not talking about ending up
with really beautiful electric cars here

and a few electric buses there

while we keep investing
in the same kind of infrastructure,

more cars, more roads, more oil.

We’re talking about
breaking free from oil,

and you cannot get there
through incrementalism.

Third, and you know this one,

the world is hungry for inspiration.

It craves stories of success

in dealing with complex issues,

especially in developing countries.

So I believe Costa Rica
can be an inspiration to others,

as we did last year when we disclosed

that for so many days
we were not using any fossil fuels

in order to generate all our electricity.

The news went viral around the world.

Also, and this makes me extremely proud,

a Costa Rican woman, Christiana Figueres,

played a decisive role in the negotiations
of the Paris climate agreement.

So we have to protect that legacy
and be an example.

So what comes next?

The people.

How do we get people to own this?

How do we get people

to believe that it’s possible

to build a society without fossil fuels?

A lot of work from
the ground up is needed.

That is why, in 2014,
we created Costa Rica Limpia.

“Limpia” means “clean,”

because we want to empower
and we want to inspire citizens.

If citizens don’t get engaged,

clean transportation decisions
will be bogged down by endless,

and I mean endless, technical discussions,

and by avalanches of lobbying
by various established interests.

Wanting to be a green country
powered by renewables

is already part of our story.

We should not let anybody
take that away from us.

Last year, we brought people
from our seven provinces

to talk about climate change
in terms that matter to them,

and we also brought this year

another group of Costa Ricans

to talk about renewable energy.

And you know what?

These people disagree on almost everything

except on renewable energy

and clean transportation and clean air.

It brings people together.

And the key to real participation

is to help people not to feel small.

People feel powerless,

and they are tired of not being heard.

So what we do is concrete things,

and we translate technical issues
into citizen language

to show that citizens have a role to play
and can play it together.

For the first time, we’re tracking
the promises that were made

on clean transportation,

and politicos know
that they have to deliver it,

but the tipping point will come
when we form coalitions –

citizens, companies,

champions of public transportation –

that will make electric mobility
the new normal,

especially in a developing country.

By the time the next election comes,

I believe every candidate
will have to disclose where they stand

on the abolition of fossil fuels.

Because this question
has to enter our mainstream politics.

And I’m telling you,
this is not a question of climate policy

or environmental agenda.

It’s about the country that we want

and the cities that we have

and the cities that we want

and who makes that choice.

Because at the end of the day,
what we have to show

is that development with renewable energy

is good for the people,

for Costa Ricans that are alive today

and especially for those
who haven’t been born.

This is our National Museum today.

It’s bright and peaceful,

and when you stand up in front of it,

it’s really hard to believe
these were military barracks

at the end of the ’40s.

We started a new life
without an army in this place,

and here is where our abolition

of fossil fuels will be announced one day.

And we will make history again.

Thank you.

(Applause)

我们如何建立一个

没有化石燃料的社会?

这是一个非常复杂的挑战

,我相信发展中国家
可以在这一转变中发挥带头作用。

我知道这
是一个有争议的声明,

但现实情况是,

如果我们让化石燃料
成为我们发展的中心,我们国家就会面临很多风险。

我们可以做不同的事情。

现在是时候,真的是

时候揭穿

一个国家必须
在发展

和环境保护、
可再生能源、生活质量之间做出选择的神话了。

我来自哥斯达黎加,
一个发展中国家。

我们有近 500 万人

,我们生活在
美洲中部,

所以很
容易记住我们住在哪里。

我们近 100% 的电力

来自可再生能源,其中有

五种。

(掌声)

水电、地热、

风能、太阳能、生物质能。

您知道吗,去年

,我们有 299 天

没有使用任何化石

燃料来发电?

这是一项了不起的成就

,然而,它隐藏了一个悖论,

我们所有能源消耗的近 70% 是石油。

为什么?

因为我们的交通

系统完全
依赖化石燃料,

就像在大多数国家一样。

因此,如果我们将能源
转型视为一场马拉松,

那么问题是,我们如何
到达终点线,

我们如何
使经济的其他部分脱碳?

公平地说
,如果我们不成功,

很难看出谁会成功。

所以这就是为什么我
想和你谈谈哥斯达黎加,

因为我相信我们

是开创
无化石燃料发展愿景的伟大候选人。

如果你知道我们国家的一件事,

那就是我们没有军队。

所以我要带你回到1948

年。那一年,这个
国家刚刚走出内战。

成千上万的哥斯达黎加人死去

,家庭分裂得很厉害。

然而,一个令人惊讶的想法
赢得了人心:

我们将重启国家

,第二共和国
将没有军队。

所以我们取消了它。

当时的总统

何塞·菲格雷斯(José Figueres)

找到了一个强大的方法
,他摧毁了一个军队基地的墙壁。

次年,即 1949 年,

我们在新宪法中永久保留了这一决定

,这就是为什么我可以在将近 70 年后告诉你这个故事的原因

我很感激。

我很感激他们
在我出生之前做出了这个决定,

因为它让我
和数以百万计的其他人

能够生活在一个非常稳定的国家。

你可能会
认为这是好运,

但事实并非如此。

有一种深思熟虑的选择模式。

在 40 年代,哥斯达黎加人获得了
免费教育和免费医疗保健。

我们称之为社会保障。

通过废除军队,

我们能够将军费开支
转化为社会开支

,这是稳定的动力。

50 年代——

(掌声

) 50 年代,我们开始
投资水力发电

,这使我们远离

了使用化石
燃料发电的陷阱,

而这正是当今世界
正在努力解决的问题。

在 70 年代,我们投资了国家公园

,这使我们

远离了你看到其他人所接受的存在严重缺陷
的增长、增长、增长逻辑


尤其是在发展中国家。

在 90 年代,我们率先
为生态系统服务付费

,这帮助我们扭转了森林砍伐

并促进了生态旅游,而生态旅游
如今已成为增长的关键引擎。

所以投资环保

并没有伤害我们的经济。

恰恰相反。

这并不意味着我们是完美的

,也不意味着
我们没有矛盾。

那不是重点。

关键是,
通过做出我们自己的选择,

我们能够
在处理发展问题时培养弹性。

另外,如果你拿一个像我们这样的国家来说

,人均 GDP
大约是 11,000 美元,

这取决于你如何衡量它。


根据社会进步指数,

在将 GDP
转化为社会进步方面,我们绝对是个例外。

废除军队,

投资于自然和人,

也做了一些非常强大的事情。

它塑造

了叙事,一个
有大想法的小国的叙事,

伴随着这种叙事成长是非常有力量的。

所以问题是,

这一代人的下一个大创意
是什么?

我相信接下来的事情

就是让这一代人永远
放弃化石燃料,

就像我们对军队所做的那样。

化石燃料造成气候变化。

我们知道这一点

,我们也知道我们
对气候变化的影响有多脆弱。

因此,作为一个发展中国家
,在

没有首先伤害人类的化石燃料的情况下建立发展符合我们的最大利益

因为

如果我们可以用电来代替,我们为什么还要继续进口石油来运输呢?

请记住,

这个国家

的电力
来自我们河流中的水,

来自火山、

风力涡轮机、太阳能电池板和

生物废物的热量。

废除化石燃料意味着
破坏我们的交通系统,

以便我们可以
用电力

而不是肮脏的能源为汽车、公共汽车和火车提供动力。

让我告诉你,交通

已经
成为我们哥斯达黎加人的生存问题,

因为我们拥有的模式
对我们不起作用。

它伤害了人们

,伤害了公司

,也伤害了我们的健康。

因为当政策
和基础设施失败时,

这就是每天都会发生的事情。

早上

两个小时,晚上两个小时。

我不明白为什么
我们必须接受这一切正常。 每天

都这样浪费我们的时间是令人反感的


在其他

交通爆炸的国家看到的相比,这条高速公路实际上相当不错。

你知道,哥斯达黎加人称之为“presa”。

Presa 的意思是“被囚禁”。

在一个以其他方式
在 pura vida 中幸福的国家,人们正在变得暴力。

正在发生。

所以很多事情都处于危险之中。

好消息

是,当我们
谈论清洁交通

和不同的流动性时,

我们并不是在谈论
某个遥远的乌托邦。

我们谈论的
是当今正在发生的电动汽车。

到 2022 年,电动汽车
和传统汽车

的成本预计将相同

,城市已经在尝试
电动公交车。

这些非常酷的生物

正在省钱

,它们减少了污染。

因此,如果我们想摆脱
以石油为基础的运输,我们可以,

因为我们现在
拥有以前没有的选择。

这真的很令人兴奋。

但是,当然,

有些人对这个想法感到非常不舒服

,他们会来告诉

你世界被石油困住了,
哥斯达黎加也是如此,所以要实事求是。

这就是他们告诉你的。

你知道
这个论点的答案是什么吗?

那是在 1948 年,我们没有
说世界被军队困住了,

所以让我们也保留我们的军队吧。

不,我们做出了一个非常勇敢的选择,

而这个选择带来了巨大的不同。

因此,现在是这一代人
再次勇敢

并永久废除化石燃料的时候了。

我会给你三个
为什么我们必须这样做的理由。

首先,

我们的交通
和城市化模式被打破,

所以这是
重新定义我们的城市和交通未来的最佳时机。

我们不想要
为汽车建造的城市。

我们希望城市

适合我们可以步行和使用自行车的人。

我们想要公共交通,

很多

公共交通
,干净而有尊严的公共交通。

因为如果我们继续
增加传统汽车的车队,

我们的城市将变得难以忍受。

其次,我们必须改变,

但增量改变
是不够的。

我们需要转型变革。

在我的国家有一些增量项目

,我是第一个庆祝它们的人。

但我们不要自欺欺人。

我们不是在谈论最终
在这里拥有非常漂亮的电动汽车

和那里的几辆电动巴士,

而我们继续投资
于相同的基础设施,

更多的汽车,更多的道路,更多的石油。

我们正在谈论
摆脱石油

,你无法
通过渐进主义来实现这一目标。

第三,你知道这一点

,世界渴望灵感。

它渴望

成功处理复杂问题的故事,

尤其是在发展中国家。

所以我相信哥斯达黎加
可以激励其他人,

就像我们去年所做的那样,当时我们

披露了这么多天来
我们没有使用任何化石

燃料来发电。

这个消息在世界范围内传播开来。

此外,这让我感到非常自豪的是

,哥斯达黎加女性克里斯蒂安娜·菲格雷斯在巴黎气候协议

的谈判中发挥了决定性作用

因此,我们必须保护这一遗产
并成为榜样。

那么接下来会发生什么?

人民。

我们如何让人们拥有它?

我们如何让人们

相信建立一个没有化石燃料的社会是可能的?

需要从头开始做很多工作。

这就是为什么我们在 2014
年创建了哥斯达黎加 Limpia。

“Limpia”的意思是“干净”,

因为我们想要赋予权力
,我们想要激励公民。

如果公民不参与,

清洁交通决策
将陷入

无休止的技术讨论,以及

各种既定利益集团的大量游说。

想要成为一个
以可再生能源为动力的绿色国家

已经是我们故事的一部分。

我们不应该让任何人
把它从我们身边夺走。

去年,我们邀请了
来自我们七个省的

人们谈论
对他们来说很重要的气候变化

,今年我们还

邀请了另一组哥斯达黎加

人谈论可再生能源。

你知道吗?

除了可再生能源

、清洁交通和清洁空气之外,这些人几乎在所有方面都存在分歧。

它将人们聚集在一起。

真正参与的关键

是帮助人们不要感到渺小。

人们感到无能为力

,他们厌倦了不被听到。

所以我们做的是具体的事情

,我们将技术问题翻译
成公民语言,

以表明公民可以发挥作用,
并且可以一起发挥作用。

我们第一次跟踪对清洁交通
做出的承诺

,政客们
知道他们必须兑现承诺,

但是
当我们结成联盟——

公民、公司、

公共交通拥护者——时,转折点就会到来

这将使电动汽车
成为新常态,

尤其是在发展中国家。

到下次选举时,

我相信每位
候选人都必须披露他们

对废除化石燃料的立场。

因为这个问题
必须进入我们的主流政治。

我告诉你,
这不是气候政策

或环境议程的问题。

这是关于我们想要的国家

和我们

拥有的城市以及我们想要的城市

以及谁做出选择。

因为归根结底,
我们必须

表明,可再生能源的发展

对人民、

对今天还活着的哥斯达黎加人

,尤其是对
那些尚未出生的人来说,都是好事。

这是我们今天的国家博物馆。

它明亮而宁静

,当你站在它面前时,

真的很难相信
这些是

40 年代末的军营。

我们
在这个地方开始了没有军队的新生活,

有一天我们将在这里宣布废除化石燃料。

我们将再次创造历史。

谢谢你。

(掌声)