The best stats youve ever seen Hans Rosling

but ten years ago I took on the task to

teach global development to Swedish

undergraduate students that was after

having spent about 20 years together

with African institution studying hunger

in Africa so I was sort of expected to

know a little about the world and I

started in our medical university

Karolinska Institute an undergraduate

course called global health but when you

get that opportunity you get a little

nervous I thought these students coming

to us actually have the highest grade

you can get in Swedish college system so

I thought maybe they know everything I’m

going to teach them about so I did a

pretest when they came and one of the

question from which I learned a lot was

this one which country has the highest

child mortality of these five pairs and

I put them together so that in each pair

of country one has twice the child

mortality of the other and this means

that it’s much bigger the difference

than the uncertainty of the data I won’t

put you to test here but it’s Turkey

which is high as there Poland Russia

Pakistan and South Africa and these were

the results of the Swedish students I

did it so I got the confidence interval

which is pretty narrow and I got happy

of course at one point eight right

answer out of five possible that means

that there was a place for a professor

of international health and for my

course but one life late-night when I

was compiling the report I really

realized my discovery I have shown that

Swedish top students know statistically

significantly less about the world than

the chimpanzees

because the chimpanzee would score half

right if I gave him two bananas with Sri

Lanka and Turkey they would be right

half of the cases but the students are

not there the problem for me was not

ignorant it was preconceived ideas I did

also an unfair unethical study of the

professors of the Karolinska Institute

that hands out the Nobel Prize in

medicine and they are on par with a

chimpanzee there so this is where I

realized that there was really a need to

communicate because the data or what’s

happening in the world and the child

health of every country is very well

aware so we did this software which

displays it like this every bubble here

is a country this country over here is

this is China this is India the size of

the bubble is the population and on this

axis here I put fertility rate because

my students what they said when they

looked upon the world and I asked them

what do you really think about the world

huh well I first discovered that the

textbook was Tintin mainly and and they

said the world is still we and them and

we is Western world and them is third

world and what do you mean with Western

world I said well that’s long life in

small family and third world is short

life in large family so this is what I

could display here I put fertility rate

here number of children per woman one

two three four up to about eight

children per woman we have very good

data since 1960 to 1968

on the size of families in all countries

the error margin is narrow here I put

life expectancy at birth from 30 years

in some countries up to about 70 years

and 1962 that was really a group of

countries here that was industrialized

countries and they had small families

and long lives and these were the

developing countries they had large

families and they had relatively short

lives now what has happened since 1962

we want to see the change or the

students right it’s still two types of

countries or have these developing

countries got smaller families and they

live here or have they got longer lives

and live up there let’s see we stopped

the world and this is all UN statistic

that has been a

here we go can you see that it’s shiner

they’re moving up against better health

are improving their or the green

latin-american countries they are moving

towards smaller families your yellow

ones here are the Arabic countries and

they get larger families but they no

longer life but not larger families the

Africans are the green down here they

still remain here this is India

Indonesia is moving on pretty fast and

in the 80s here you have Bangladesh

still among the African countries there

but now Bangladesh it’s a miracle that

happens in the 80s the moms start to

promote Family Planning and they move up

into that corner and in 90s we have the

terrible HIV epidemic that takes down

the life expectancy of the African

countries and all the rest of the mall

moves up into the corner where we have

long lives and small family and we have

a completely new world

let me make a comparison directly

between United States of America and

Vietnam 1964 America had small families

and long life Vietnam had large families

and short lives and this is what happens

the data during the war indicate that

even with all the death there was an

improvement of life expectancy by the

end of the year the Family Planning

started in Vietnam and they went for

smaller families and the United States

up there is getting for longer life

keeping family size and in the 80s now

they give up communist planning and they

go for market economy and it moves

faster even in social life and today we

have in Vietnam the same life expectancy

and the same family size here in Vietnam

19 2003 as in the United States 1974 by

the end of the war I think we all if we

don’t look in the data we underestimate

the tremendous change in Asia which was

in social change before we saw the

economical change so let’s move over to

another way here in which we could

display that distribution in the world

of the income this is the world

distribution of income of people $1 $10

or $100 per day there’s no gap between

rich and poor any longer this is a myth

there’s a little hump here but there are

people all the way and if we look where

the income ends up the income this is

100 percent of world’s annual income and

the rich is 20%

they take out of that about 74 percent

and the poor is 20 percent they take

about 2% and this shows that the concept

developing countries is extremely

doubtful we sort of think about aid like

these people here giving aid to these

people here but in the middle we have

most a world population and they have

now 24 percent of the income we heard it

in other forms and who are who are

released these where are the different

countries I can show you Africa

this is Africa 10% of world population

most in poverty

this is oacd the rich country the

country club of the UN and they are over

here on this side and quite an overlap

between Africa and oacd and this is

Latin America it has everything on this

earth from the poorest to the richest in

Latin America and on top of that we can

put East Europe we can put East Asia and

we could South Asia and how did it look

like if we go back in time to about 1970

then there was more of a hump and we

have most who lived in absolute poverty

were Asians the problem in the world was

the poverty in Asia and if I now let the

world move forward you will seem that

wild population increase there are

hundreds of millions in Asia getting out

of poverty and some others get into

poverty and this is the pattern we have

today and the best projection from the

World Bank is that this will happen and

we will not have a divided world we have

most people in the middle of course it’s

a logarithmic scale here but our concept

of economy is growth with percent we

look upon it as a possibility of percent

increase if I change this and I take GDP

per capita instead of family income and

I turn these individual data into

regional data of gross domestic product

and I take the regions down here the

size of the bubble is still the

population and you have the OECD there

and you have sub-saharan Africa there

and we take off the Arab states they’re

coming both from Africa and from Asia

and we put them separately and we can

expand this axis and I can give it a new

dimension here by adding the social

values they shall survival now I have

money on that axis and I have the

possibility of children to survive there

in some countries ninety-nine point

seven percent of children survive to

five years of age others only seventy

and here it seems that Z is a gap

between oacd Latin America East Europe

East Asia Arab States South Asia and

sub-saharan Africa the linearity is very

strong between child survival

and money but let me split sub-saharan

Africa health is there and better health

is up there I can go here and I can

split sub-saharan Africa into its

countries and when it bursts the size of

East country bubble it’s the size of the

population Sierra Leone the down there

mo reaches up there now reaches was the

first country to get away with trade

barriers and they could sell by sugar

they could sell their textiles on equal

terms as the people in Europe and North

America there’s a huge difference

between Africa and Ghana is here in the

middle in Sierra Leone a humanitarian

aid here in Uganda development aid here

time to invest there you can go for

holiday it’s a tremendous variation

within Africa which we very often make

that it’s equal everything I can split

South Asia here India’s the big bubble

in the middle but huge difference

between Afghanistan and Sri Lanka and I

can speed Arab states holiday same

climate same culture same religion huge

difference even between neighbors Yemen

Civil War United Arab Emirates money

which was quite equally and well used

not as the mythos and that includes all

the children of the foreign workers who

are in the country data is often better

than you think

many people say data is bad there is an

uncertainty margin but we can see the

difference here Cambodia Singapore the

differences are much bigger than the

weakness of the data East Europe Soviet

economy for a long time but they come

out of the ten years very very

differently and there is Latin America

today we don’t have to go to Cuba to

find a healthy country in Latin America

Chile will have a lower child mortality

than Cuba within some few years from now

and here we have high-income countries

in OECD and we get the whole pattern

here of the world which is more or less

like like this and if we look at it how

it looks the world in 1960 it starts to

move 1960 this is mouths a tomb he

brought health to China and then he died

and then things your pink a man

brought money to China and brought them

into the mainstream again and we have

seen how countries move in different

directions like this so it’s sort of

sort of difficult to get an example

country which shows the pattern of the

world but I would like to bring you back

to about here at 1960 and I would like

to compare South Korea which is this one

with with Brazil which is this one the

label went away from me here and I would

like to compare Uganda which is there

and I can run it forward like this and

you can see how South Korea is making a

very very fast advancement

whereas Brazil is much slower and if we

move back again here and we put on

trails on them like this you can see

again that the speed of development is

very very different and the countries

are moving more or less in the same rate

as money and health but it seems you can

move much faster if you’re healthy first

than if you are wealthy first and to

show that you can put on the way of

united arab emirate they came from here

a mineral country they catch all the oil

they got all the money but health cannot

be bought at the supermarket you have to

invest in health you have to get kids

into schooling you have to Train health

staff you have to educate the population

and sheikh zayed did that in a fairly

good way and the inspite of falling oil

prices he brought this country up here

so we got a much more mainstream

appearance of the world where all

countries tend to use their money better

than they used in the past now

this is more or less if you look at if

you look at the average data of the

countries they are like this now that’s

dangerous to use average data because

there’s such a lot of difference within

countries so if I go and look here we

can see that

Uganda that today is where South Korea

was 1960 if I split Uganda there’s quite

a difference within Uganda these are the

quintiles of Uganda the richest 20% of

Ugandan czar there the poorest are down

there if I split South Africa it’s like

this and if I go down and look at

Nigeria where there was such a terrible

famine lost Lee it’s like this the 20%

poorest of Nigeria is out here and the

20% richest of South Africa is there and

yet we tend to discuss on what solutions

they should be in Africa everything in

this world exists in Africa

you can’t discuss universal access to

HIV for that quintile up here with the

same strategy as down here the

improvement of the world must be highly

contextualized and it’s not relevant to

have it on regional level we must be

much more detailed we find that students

get very excited when they can use this

and even more policymakers and the

corporate sectors would like to see see

how the world is changing now why

doesn’t this take place why are we not

using the data we have we have data in

the United Nation in the National

Statistical agencies and in universities

another non-governmental organization

because the data is hidden down in the

databases and the public is there and

the internet is there but we have still

not used it effectively all that

information was so changing in the world

does not include publicly funded

statistics there are some web pages like

this you know but they take some

nourishment down from the databases but

people put prices on them stupid

passwords and boring statistics and this

won’t work

so what is needed we have the databases

it’s not a new database you need we have

wonderful design tools and more and more

I added up here so we started a

non-profit venture which we called

linking data to design we call it

Gapminder from London Underground where

they warn you mind the gap so we thought

gap mind was appropriate and we started

to write software which could link the

data like this and it wasn’t that

difficult

it took some person years and we have

produced animations you can take a data

set and put it there we are liberating

you and data some few UN organizations

some countries accept that their

databases can go out on the world but

what we really need is of course a

search function a search function where

we can copy the data up to a searchable

format and get it out in the world and

what do we hear when we go around I’ve

done anthropology on the main

statistical units everyone says it’s

impossible this can’t be done our

information is so peculiar in detail so

that cannot be searched as other can be

searched we cannot give the data free to

the students free to the entrepreneurs

of the world but this is what we would

like to see isn’t it the publicly funded

data is down here and we would like

flowers to grow out on the net and one

of the crucial point is to make them

searchable and then people can use the

different design tool to animate it

there and I have a pretty good news for

you I have a good news that the present

new head of UN statistic he doesn’t say

it’s impossible he only says we can’t do

it and that’s a quite clever guy

so we can see a lot happening in data in

the coming years we will be able to look

at income distributions in completely

new ways this is the income distribution

of China 1970 this is the income

distribution of the United States 1970

almost no overlap almost no overlap and

what has happened what has happened is

this the China is growing it’s not so

equal any longer and it’s appearing here

overlooking the United States almost

like a ghost isn’t it it’s pretty scared

but I think it’s very important to have

have all this information we need we

need really to see it and instead of

looking at this I would like to end up

by showing the Internet users per 1000

and this software we access about 500

variables from all the countries quite

easily it takes some time to change for

this but only accesses you can quite

easily get any variable you would like

to have and the thing would be to get up

the database is free to get them

searchable and with a second click to

get them into the graphic formats where

you can instantly understand them now

the statisticians doesn’t like it

because they say that this will not this

will not show the reality we have to

have statistical analytical methods but

this is hypothesis-generating

I end now with a world where the

internet are coming the number of

Internet users are going up like this

this is the GDP per capita and it’s a

new technology coming in but in

amazingly how well it fits to the

economy of the countries that’s why the

$100 computer will be so important but

it’s a nice tenders it’s as if the world

is flattening off isn’t it these

countries are lifting more than the

economy and will be very interesting to

follow this over the year as I would

like you to be able to do

with all the publicly funded data thank

you very much

但十年前

,在

与非洲机构一起研究非洲饥饿问题大约 20 年后,我承担了向瑞典本科生教授全球发展的任务,

所以我有点期望

对世界了解一点,所以我

开始 我们的医科大学

卡罗林斯卡学院有一

门名为全球健康的本科课程,但当

你有机会时,你会有点

紧张

我要教他们,所以

当他们来的时候我做了一个预测试

,我从中学到很多的

一个问题

是这五对中哪个国家的儿童死亡率最高,

我把它们放在一起,这样在每一

对 一个国家的儿童死亡率是另一个国家的两倍

,这

意味着差异

比我不会让你知道的数据的不确定性

要大得多 在这里进行测试,但土耳其

和波兰俄罗斯巴基斯坦和南非一样高,这些

是瑞典学生的

结果 五分之五这

意味着有一个地方可以让

国际健康教授和我

的课程,但是当

我编写报告时,我真的

意识到我的发现我已经证明

瑞典的顶尖学生在统计学上知道的

更少 世界

比黑猩猩好,

因为

如果我给黑猩猩两根香蕉,

斯里兰卡和土耳其的黑猩猩会得分一半,他们将是正确的

一半,但学生

不在那里对我来说问题不是

无知而是先入为主的想法我做了

也是对卡罗林斯卡学院教授的一项不公平的不道德研究,

他们颁发了诺贝尔医学奖,他们与

黑猩猩相提并论 因此,我

意识到确实有必要进行

交流,因为数据或

世界上正在发生的事情以及

每个国家的儿童健康都非常

清楚,所以我们做了这个软件,

它像这样显示它这里的每个气泡

都是一个 国家 这个国家

这里是中国 这是印度 泡沫的大小

是人口 在这个

轴上 我把生育率放在这里是因为

我的学生他们在看待世界时所说的话

我问他们

你的真实想法 关于世界

嗯嗯我第一次发现

教科书主要是丁丁,他们

说世界还是我们和他们,

我们是西方世界,他们是

第三世界,你说西方世界是什么意思?

我说好的那是长寿

小家庭和第三世界

在大家庭中的寿命很短,所以这就是我

可以在这里展示的内容 我把生育率放在

这里 每个女人的孩子数量

一二三四到

每个女人大约八个孩子

自 1960 年到 1968

年关于所有国家家庭规模的非常好的数据

这里的误差范围很窄 我把

一些国家的出生时预期寿命从 30 岁提高到 70 岁左右,

而 1962 年这确实是一组

国家 工业化

国家,他们有小家庭

和长寿,这些是

发展中国家,他们有

大家庭,他们的寿命相对较短

现在自 1962 年以来发生的事情

我们希望看到变化或

学生对它仍然是两种类型的

国家或有 这些发展中国家的

家庭较小,他们

住在这里,或者他们的寿命更长

,住在那里,让我们看看我们停止

了世界,这就是联合国的所有统计数据

我们去吧,你能看到

他们正在向上移动吗? 反对更好的健康

正在改善他们的或绿色的

拉丁美洲国家他们正在

向更小的家庭移动你的黄色

国家是阿拉伯国家

他们得到了l 更大的家庭,但他们

不再生活,但不是更大的家庭

非洲人是绿色的,他们

仍然留在这里这是印度

印度尼西亚正在快速发展,

在 80 年代,孟加拉国

仍然是那里的非洲国家之一,

但现在孟加拉国是一个 奇迹

发生在 80 年代,妈妈们开始

提倡计划生育,她们

走到了那个角落,在 90 年代,我们遇到了

可怕的艾滋病毒流行病,降低

了非洲国家的预期寿命,

商场的所有其他地方都

进入了 我们有

长寿和小家庭的角落,我们有

一个全新的世界

让我直接

比较美利坚合众国和

越南 1964 美国有小家庭

和长寿越南有大家庭

和短命,这就是发生的事情

战争期间的数据表明,

即使在所有死亡的

情况下,到年底计划生育开始时预期寿命也有所提高

n 越南,他们追求

较小的家庭,而

美国则追求更长的寿命,

保持家庭规模,到了 80 年代,现在

他们放弃了共产主义计划,他们

走向市场经济,

即使在社会生活中也发展得更快,今天我们

有 在越南

19 2003 年和美国 1974 年

战争结束时的预期寿命和相同的家庭人数 我认为如果我们

不查看数据,我们都会低估

亚洲的巨大变化

在我们看到经济变化之前的社会变革中,

所以让我们转移到

另一种方式,在这里我们可以

显示

收入世界的分布 这是世界

上人们的收入分布 每天 1 美元 10

美元或 100 美元 富人之间没有差距

穷人不再是一个神话

这里有一点驼峰但

一路上都有人如果我们

看看收入最终收入

是世界年收入的100%

而富人是20%

他们拿走了大约 74

% 穷人是 20% 他们拿走了

大约 2% 这表明发展中国家的概念

非常可疑 我们

拥有世界上最多的人口,他们

现在拥有我们所听到的其他形式的收入的 24%

,谁被

释放了这些在哪些不同的

国家我可以告诉你非洲

这是非洲世界人口的 10%

最贫困

这个 OACD 是富国

联合国的乡村俱乐部 他们就

在这边

非洲和 OACD 之间有很大的重叠 这是

拉丁美洲 它拥有

地球上从拉丁美洲最贫穷到最富有的一切

其中我们可以

放东欧,我们可以放东亚,我们可以放南亚,

如果我们回到 1970 年左右,那会是什么样子,

然后有更多的驼峰,

我们大多数人都生活在绝对视角 如果

是亚洲人,世界上的问题

是亚洲的贫困,如果我现在让

世界向前发展,你会

觉得人口数量急剧增加

,亚洲有数亿

人摆脱贫困,而其他一些人则陷入

贫困,这就是 我们今天拥有的模式

,世界银行的最佳预测

是这将会发生,

我们不会有一个分裂的世界我们有

大多数人在中间当然这是

一个对数规模,但我们

的经济概念是增长与我们

看的百分比

如果我改变这一点,我把

人均GDP而不是家庭收入作为增加百分比的可能性,

我把这些个人数据变成

国内生产总值的区域数据

,我把这些区域降下来

,泡沫的大小仍然是

人口,那里有经合组织,

那里有撒哈拉以南非洲

,我们取消了阿拉伯国家,它们

来自非洲和亚洲

,我们将它们分开放置,我们可以

扩展这个轴,我可以

通过添加

他们现在应该生存

的社会

价值观来给它一个新的维度

五岁其他人只有七十岁

,这里似乎 Z 是

oacd 拉丁美洲 东欧

东亚 阿拉伯国家 南亚和

撒哈拉以南非洲

之间的差距 儿童生存和金钱之间的线性非常强,

但让我分裂撒哈拉以南

非洲的健康就在那里,那里的健康状况更好

现在reach是

第一个摆脱

贸易壁垒的国家,他们可以用糖

出售他们可以

像欧洲和北美人民一样平等地出售纺织品,

这是一个巨大的差异

非洲和加纳之间的关系

在塞拉利昂的中间 乌干达的人道主义

援助 发展援助 这里

是投资的时间 你可以去那里

度假 这是非洲内部的巨大差异

我们经常

把它等同于我可以分裂的一切

南 亚洲在这里 印度是中间的大泡沫

,但

阿富汗和斯里兰卡之间的巨大差异,我

可以加快阿拉伯国家的假期相同的

气候相同的文化相同的宗教

甚至在邻国之间也有巨大的差异也门

内战阿拉伯联合酋长国的

钱相当平等且很好地使用了

作为神话,包括在该国的所有

外国工人的孩子,

数据通常

比您认为的

许多人说的数据不好,存在

不确定性,但我们可以在

这里看到差异柬埔寨新加坡

差异要大得多 比

东欧苏维埃经济疲软的数据

很长一段时间,但他们

走出了十年非常ver y

不同的是,今天有拉丁美洲

,我们不必去古巴就

可以在拉丁美洲找到一个健康的国家,

几年后智利的儿童死亡率将低于古巴,

而我们在经合组织中拥有高收入国家

我们在这里得到了世界的整个格局

,或多或少

像这样,如果我们看看

它在 1960 年的世界是什么样子,它开始在 1960 年

移动,这是一张嘴,他

给中国带来了健康,然后他死了

然后是你的粉红色的东西,一个男人

把钱带到中国,又把它们

带入了主流,我们已经

看到国家是如何像这样朝着不同的

方向发展的,所以

很难找到一个

展示世界格局的榜样国家,

但是 我想带你

回到大约 1960 年的这里,我

想将韩国

和巴西进行比较,巴西是这个

标签从我这里消失的地方,我

想比较那里的乌干达

和我 可以像这样向前推进,

你可以看到韩国是如何取得

非常快速的进步,

而巴西则慢得多,如果我们

再次回到这里,我们

像这样在他们身上开辟道路,你可以

再次看到发展的速度

非常不同,各国

的发展速度或多或少

与金钱和健康的速度相同,但

如果你首先健康,那么你的行动似乎

比你首先富有并

表明你可以前进的速度更快

阿拉伯联合酋长国 他们来自这里

一个矿产国 他们捕捞了所有的石油

他们得到了所有的钱 但健康

不能在超市买到 你必须

投资于健康 你必须让

孩子上学 你必须培训

卫生人员 你有 为了教育民众

,谢赫扎耶德以相当好的方式做到了这一点,尽管

油价

下跌,他还是把这个国家带到了这里,

所以我们得到了一个更加主流

的世界外观,所有

国家都倾向于使用 t 继承人的钱

比他们过去使用的要好,现在

这或多或少,如果你看看如果

你看一下国家的平均数据,

他们现在这样

使用平均数据是危险的,因为

国家之间有很大的差异,所以 如果我去看看这里,我们

可以看到

今天的乌干达是 1960 年韩国

所在地

分裂南非是

这样的,如果我下去看看

尼日利亚,那里发生了如此可怕的

饥荒,失去了李,就像这样

,尼日利亚最贫穷的 20% 在这里,

南非最富有的 20% 在那里,

但我们倾向于 讨论他们应该在非洲采取什么样的解决方案

这个世界上的一切都存在于非洲,

你不能

在这里用与这里相同的策略讨论这个五分之一的人普遍获得艾滋病毒,

世界的改善必须是 高度

情境化,与

区域层面无关 我们必须

更详细 我们发现学生

可以使用它时会非常兴奋

,甚至更多的政策制定者和

企业部门希望

看到世界现在正在如何变化 为什么

这不会发生为什么我们不

使用我们拥有的数据我们

在联合国的国家

统计机构和大学中拥有数据

另一个非政府组织

因为数据隐藏在

数据库中并且公众在那里并且

互联网就在那里,但我们仍然

没有有效地使用它所有这些

信息在世界上如此变化

不包括公共资助的

统计数据有一些这样的网页

你知道,但它们从数据库中获取了一些

营养,但

人们会定价 他们愚蠢的

密码和无聊的统计数据,

这不起作用

所以我们需要什么我们有数据库

它不是你需要的新数据库我们已经

赢得了 我在这里添加了越来越多的设计工具,

所以我们开始了一个

非营利性企业,我们称之为

将数据链接到设计,我们称之为

伦敦地铁的 Gapminder,

他们警告你注意差距,所以我们认为

差距思维是合适的,我们开始了

编写可以

像这样链接数据的软件,这并不

,花了一些人几年时间,我们

制作了动画,你可以把数据

集放在那里,我们正在解放

你和一些联合国组织

一些国家接受的数据 他们的

数据库可以发布到世界各地,但

我们真正需要的当然是

搜索功能 搜索功能,

我们可以将数据复制到可搜索的

格式并发布到世界各地,

当我们四处走动时我们会听到什么 我

对主要统计单位做过人类学,

每个人都说

不可能,这不能做我们的

信息是如此详细,

以至于无法搜索,因为其他可以

搜索我们无法提供

对学生免费,对世界企业家免费,

但这就是我们

希望看到的,不是公共资助的

数据在这里吗?我们希望

花朵在网上长出来,

关键点之一是 让它们

可搜索,然后人们可以使用

不同的设计工具在其中制作动画

,我有一个好消息要

告诉你我有一个好消息,

现任联合国统计局的新负责人他没有说

不可能,他只是说我们

做不到,那是一个非常聪明的人,

所以我们可以看到

未来几年的数据会发生很多事情我们将能够以

全新的方式看待收入分配这

是中国 1970 年的收入分配这是收入

分配 1970 年的美国

几乎没有重叠 几乎没有重叠

发生了什么 发生的事情是

这样 ared,

但我认为

拥有我们需要的所有这些信息非常重要,我们

需要真正看到它,而不是

看这个,我想

最终显示每 1000 名互联网用户

和这个软件,我们从所有人中访问大约 500 个

变量 这些国家很

容易为此需要一些时间来改变

,但只有访问你才能很

容易地获得你想要的任何变量

,事情是

建立数据库是免费的,让它们

可搜索,第二次点击即可

获得 将它们转换为图形格式,

您现在可以立即理解它们

统计学家不喜欢它,

因为他们说这不会 这

不会显示我们必须

拥有统计分析方法的现实,

但这是假设生成

我现在以一个结尾

互联网即将到来的世界

互联网用户数量正在像这样增加

这是人均GDP,这是一项

新技术,但

令人惊讶的是它与

欧盟的契合程度 这就是为什么

100 美元的计算机如此重要的原因,

但这是一个很好的招标,就好像世界

正在趋于平缓,不是这些

国家的提振幅度大于

经济增长,而且

在这一年中遵循这一点将非常有趣 我

希望您能够

处理所有公共资助的数据

,非常感谢