Voting doesnt need to be so hard. Lets redesign it

Transcriber: Eunice Tan
Reviewer: David DeRuwe

Voting can be hard.

It’s been hard -

sometimes painful, sometimes impossible -

since the very beginning
of our democracy.

This year and years prior,

we’ve seen voters wait in line
for five, six, and seven hours.

And the issue hasn’t been fixed.

Now, some people
may see these images and think,

“How patriotic,

how impressive that someone would wait
in line for seven hours just to vote.”

But to me, it’s not impressive at all.

It’s disrespectful to these voters.

Making voting difficult goes against
the very core of our democracy.

If we could redesign the system

to make it more convenient,
more accessible, and easier for voters,

why wouldn’t we?

Now, the short answer is political will.

Many established politicians
would not actually benefit personally

from a reformed voting process
that’s inclusive for all voters.

Politicians are the players in the game,
but yet they set the rules for the game.

Election policy must be
about who votes, not who wins.

And the more complicated answer

is that our voting system
and election system in the United States

is highly decentralized and inconsistent.

Over 10,000 different local
election officials administer this process

in cities and towns and counties
across the country.

They might vary in size
from 400 voters to 4.7 million.

There’s also 50 different
state legislative bodies

that set the rules of the game

[Vote at Home Status by State]

and over 50 different
chief election officials and entities

that oversee those rules
and how they’re administered.

So voting may vary greatly
from state to state.

Best-case scenario,
you’re in a state like Colorado,

and a ballot is mailed to you proactively
before each and every election.

No bureaucracy, no extra paperwork.

The ballot comes,

and the government is responsible
for delivering democracy to you.

Worst-case scenario,
you’re in a state like Missouri,

where your options are limited,

you have overly restrictive
voter registration deadlines,

and if you can’t get off work

or you don’t have childcare

or you’re sick,

that’s too bad.

And most American voters
don’t fall into the best-case scenario.

Now, in my career as an elections official

for many years,

and now leading the National
Vote at Home Institute

and our work to improve the voting process
across the United States,

I’ve talked to thousands of voters
about their voting experience

and thousands of election officials
about the process.

I also co-authored a book
called “When Women Vote”

that outlines a roadmap and a playbook
for how to improve the process for all.

And so I ask you:

What would you choose?

Which scenario would you choose?

Now, the 2016 election

was the most highly watched,
most anticipated election in US history.

And yet only 60 percent
of eligible Americans actually voted.

100 million people -

over 100 million people -

did not vote in 2016.

And when they were surveyed as to why,

over 40 percent indicated
it was due to a barrier:

missing a deadline, couldn’t get off work,
couldn’t wait in line for hours.

If “did not vote”
was on the ballot in 2016,

“did not vote” would have won
in a landslide.

What we end up with is a system

where a minority of eligible Americans
are choosing the politicians

that make decisions
for all of us collectively.

Trust in the US government
and politicians is at an all-time low,

and the ballot box isn’t helping.

If we can’t even cast a vote easily,

why would we ever trust the process
or trust politicians?

We must put voters first.

I’ll say that again:

We must put voters first

in election policies
and designing a system that serves them.

Just ask any successful business.

We live in an era of same-day shipping,
free delivery, Lyft and Uber,

and take-home cocktails.

And consumers, especially
in the height of the pandemic,

are choosing their experiences

in the comfort of their home
and on their schedules.

So why can’t we design a voting process
that is as convenient as that?

Luckily, we don’t have to speculate.

In Colorado, we’ve already
designed that process.

And Colorado is now
one of the best states to vote in

and also one of the most secure.

In 2013, I worked with a group
of dedicated leaders

to redesign our voting process

and pass legislation
that put voters first.

In Colorado, every voter
receives a ballot ahead of each election,

they’re automatically registered to vote,

there’s no overly restrictive deadlines,

and with BallotTRACE,

voters can track their ballot
just like they would a package -

through the process
from the moment it’s mailed

to the moment the election official
receives it for counting.

Now, that system was pioneered
in Denver now 11 years ago.

And when we designed it,

we were able to reduce
our call volume by 70 percent

and infuse transparency
and accountability into the process.

Now, when you get that ballot at home,

you can vote it and then mail it back in
or drop it off in person.

And if you want to vote in person,
you can do that too,

and you’re not confined
to the government-assigned polling places

on one day.

You can go to any vote center -

close to your kid’s school,
close to work, close to home -

and you can do so over a few weeks
prior to the election.

It’s been seven years

since we passed that legislation
and implemented that model.

And the results are incredible.

Colorado increased turnout significantly

and now is one of the top states
for voter turnout

and also one of the most secure.

We also saw a reduction in costs.

So because more people
were voting at home,

we didn’t need as many poll workers,

and we saw that reduced
by over 70 percent.

When we went to buy a new voting system,
we no longer needed as much equipment.

And instead of spending
$150 million on a new voting system,

we as a state spent $20 million.

We also saw voters
go farther down the ballot

to local races and ballot issues,

and we saw turnout increase
on those down-ballot races and issues.

Those races include mayor
and school board and city council,

and they also include the long -

the really long legalese ballot issues
that take forever to figure out.

Voters now have a laptop
in reach at their home,

and they can research candidates
and issues on their own time.

We also have research now that shows
that voting by mail and voting at home

makes voters more informed

because they have all of that extra time,

as opposed to being in person

and worrying about the long line
of voters behind you

while you’re trying to rush through.

And the final, most important aspect

of the results that we’ve seen
out of Colorado

is about civics for future voters.

And I want to share my story
with my two elementary children.

Every time my ballot comes
before each election,

one of my kids gets it,
and they always start asking,

“When are we going
to fill out Mom’s ballot?”

We sit down together,

they read the instructions to me,
they read the candidate names,

and they ask me questions like,

“Mom, what does the governor do?

What does the mayor do?

Maybe I want to be a mayor someday.”

We research those issues together,
we talk about it,

and it takes me forever
to complete my ballot.

But I know that I have created
lifelong, civically engaged voters

and future voters

that understand that the choices
they make on that ballot

impact their communities and their world.

This is the type of voting experience

that we want for every voter
across the country.

Many other states have taken notice,

including California,
Vermont, New Jersey, Hawaii.

All have expanded options
for voting at home this year, in 2020.

Americans are resilient.

We need a voting process
that is also resilient -

from a pandemic,
from burdens and barriers,

from inequities, from unfairness,

from foreign adversaries,
and from administrative deficiencies.

Across the country, voters are choosing
to vote at home in record numbers.

It is safe, it is secure,

and we have built-in security measures

to deter and detect bad actors
who try to interfere with the process.

Today, voting at home means paper ballots,

but in the future,
that might look very different.

Voters deserve an awesome
and safe voting experience,

free from barriers and burdens.

It’s the politicians that serve us,
not the other way around.

You deserve excellence.

Expect it, demand it, and advocate for it.

Thank you.

抄写员:Eunice Tan
审稿人:David DeRuwe

投票可能很困难。 自从我们的民主开始以来,

这一直很艰难

——有时是痛苦的,有时是不可能的

今年和前几年,

我们已经看到选民排队
等候五个、六个和七个小时。

而且问题还没有解决。

现在,有些
人看到这些画面,可能会想,

“多么爱国,

多么令人印象深刻,有人
为了投票就排了七个小时的队。”

但对我来说,它一点也不令人印象深刻。

这是对这些选民的不尊重。

让投票变得困难违背
了我们民主的核心。

如果我们可以重新设计系统


让选民更方便、更容易获得、更容易,

我们为什么不呢?

现在,简短的回答是政治意愿。

许多老牌政客
实际上不会

从改革后的投票程序中受益,该程序
对所有选民都具有包容性。

政治家是游戏中的参与者,
但他们为游戏制定规则。

选举政策必须是
关于谁投票,而不是谁获胜。

而更复杂的答案

是,我们
在美国的投票制度和选举制度

是高度去中心化和不一致的。

超过 10,000 名不同的地方
选举官员

在全国各地的城镇和县管理这一过程。

它们的规模可能
从 400 名选民到 470 万不等。

还有 50 个不同的
州立法

机构制定游戏规则

[按州进行在家投票],

还有 50 多个不同的
首席选举官员和实体

负责监督
这些规则及其管理方式。

因此,投票可能因州而异

最好的情况是,
您在科罗拉多州这样的州,每次选举前都会

主动向您邮寄选票

没有官僚主义,没有额外的文书工作。

选票来了

,政府有责任
为你提供民主。

最坏的情况,
你在像密苏里这样的州

,你的选择有限,

你的
选民登记截止日期过于严格

,如果你不能下班,

或者你没有托儿服务,

或者你生病了,

这太糟糕了。

大多数美国选民
并没有陷入最好的情况。

现在,在我作为选举官员多年的职业生涯中

,现在领导全国
家庭投票研究所

和我们改善全美投票过程的工作

我已经与成千上万的选民
谈论了他们的投票经验

和成千上万的 选举官员
关于这个过程。

我还与人合着了一本
名为“当女性投票时”

的书,其中概述
了如何改进所有人的流程的路线图和剧本。

所以我问你:

你会选择什么?

你会选择哪种场景?

现在,2016年的

大选是美国历史上最受瞩目、最受期待的大选。

然而,只有 60%
的符合条件的美国人实际投票。

1 亿人——

超过 1 亿人——

在 2016 年没有投票。

当他们被调查原因时,

超过 40% 的人表示
这是由于障碍:

错过最后期限、无法下班、
等不及 排队几个小时。

如果“未投票”
在 2016 年的选票上出现,

“未投票”将会
以压倒性优势获胜。

我们最终得到的是一个系统

,其中少数符合条件的美国人
正在选择

为我们所有人共同做出决定的政客。

对美国政府
和政客的信任处于历史最低点,

而投票箱也无济于事。

如果我们甚至不能轻易投票,

我们为什么要相信这个过程
或相信政客?

我们必须把选民放在第一位。

我再说一遍:

我们必须

在选举政策中将选民放在首位,
并设计一个为他们服务的系统。

只要问任何成功的企业。

我们生活在一个当天发货、
免费送货、Lyft 和 Uber

以及带回家的鸡尾酒的时代。

消费者,尤其是
在疫情最严重的时期,

正在舒适的家中
和日程安排中选择他们的体验。

那么为什么我们不能设计一个
如此方便的投票流程呢?

幸运的是,我们不必推测。

在科罗拉多州,我们已经
设计了该流程。

科罗拉多州现在
是投票的最佳州

之一,也是最安全的州之一。

2013 年,我与
一群敬业的领导人

合作,重新设计了我们的投票程序,

并通过
了将选民放在首位的立法。

在科罗拉多州,每位选民
在每次选举前都会收到一张选票,

他们会自动登记投票,

没有过于严格的截止日期,

并且使用 BallotTRACE,

选民可以
像跟踪包裹一样跟踪他们的选票——

从投票的那一刻起就完成整个流程 邮寄

到选举官员
收到它进行计数的那一刻。

现在,该系统是
11 年前在丹佛开创的。

当我们设计它时,

我们能够将
通话量减少 70%

,并将透明度
和问责制注入到流程中。

现在,当您在家中拿到选票时,

您可以投票,然后将其寄回
或亲自投递。

如果你想亲自投票,
你也可以这样做,

而且你一天也不
局限于政府指定的

投票站。

你可以去任何投票中心——

靠近你孩子的学校、
靠近工作单位、靠近家

——你可以
在选举前几周这样做。

自我们通过该立法
并实施该模式以来已经七年了。

结果令人难以置信。

科罗拉多州的投票率显着提高

,现在是选民投票率最高的州

之一,也是最安全的州之一。

我们还看到了成本的降低。

因此,由于更多的
人在家投票,

我们不需要那么多的投票工作人员

,我们看到这
减少了 70% 以上。

当我们去购买新的投票系统时,
我们不再需要那么多设备。

而不是
在新的投票系统上花费 1.5 亿美元,

我们作为一个州花费了 2000 万美元。

我们还看到选民
在选票

上走得更远到地方种族和选票问题

,我们看到
这些选票不足的比赛和问题的投票率有所增加。

这些竞选包括市长
、学校董事会和市议会

,他们还包括漫长的

——真正漫长的法律投票问题
,需要永远弄清楚。

选民现在在家中可以使用笔记本电脑

,他们可以
在自己的时间研究候选人和问题。

我们现在也有研究
表明,通过邮寄投票和在家投票

可以让选民更了解情况,

因为他们有所有额外的时间,

而不是亲自

去担心
你身后排长队的选民。

冲过去。

我们在科罗拉多州看到的最后一个最重要

的结果

是关于未来选民的公民问题。

我想
和我的两个小孩子分享我的故事。

每次我的选票
在每次选举之前

,我的一个孩子都会得到它
,他们总是开始问,

“我们什么
时候填写妈妈的选票?”

我们坐在一起

,他们念给我看的说明,
念候选人的名字,

然后问我这样的问题,

“妈妈,州长是做

什么的?市长是做什么的?

也许有一天我想当市长。”

我们一起研究这些问题,
我们谈论它

,我花了很长时间
才能完成我的选票。

但我知道,我创造了
终身参与公民活动的选民

和未来的选民


他们明白他们在选票上做出的选择会

影响他们的社区和世界。

是我们希望全国每一位选民都能获得的投票体验

许多其他州已经注意到了,

包括加利福尼亚、
佛蒙特州、新泽西州和夏威夷。

今年,2020 年,所有人都扩大了在家投票的选择。

美国人有韧性。

我们需要一个具有弹性的投票过程
——

免受大流行病
、负担和障碍

、不平等、不公平

、外国对手
和行政缺陷的影响。

在全国范围内,选民正在
以创纪录的数字选择在家投票。

它是安全的,它是安全的

,我们有内置的安全措施

来阻止和检测
试图干扰该过程的不良行为者。

今天,在家投票意味着纸质选票,

但在未来,
情况可能会大不相同。

选民应该获得令人敬畏
和安全的投票体验,

没有障碍和负担。

为我们服务的是政客,
而不是相反。

你值得卓越。

期待它,要求它,并倡导它。

谢谢你。