Sustainability In The Digital Age

yeah thank you very much for having me

here i’m going to talk about

sustainability transformations in the

digital age

so i’m coming from the field of

sustainability transformations i’m

interested in climate change i’m

interested in tipping points in the

earth system

and today i would like to discuss how

the digital transformation might help us

to get these things done

and this is why we did from the german

advisory council on global change i was

the

chair of this advisory bodytalk german

government we did a study

towards a common digital future where we

tried to understand

the potentials but also the risks of

digital transformations

towards sustainability and you might not

believe it but in 2015 when we decided

upon these sd the sdgs the 2030 agenda

the sustainability goals

this was not only this was not even a

debate

the discussion about digitalization

artificial intelligence

was not existent and today this is

changing obviously you might have

listened to was lavender line the

commission president of the european

union

in her talk about the future of europe

she talked about the decade of the 20th

as the decade of digitalization and

sustainability

but how are we going to bring this

together this is what i would like to

reflect upon and i’m focusing on two

main questions here

and presenting then to you and heuristic

how we could

think about bringing these two mega

trends in our societies together

the first question which i would like to

ask is how could we use the powerful

technologies to change

our economies and societies towards

sustainability

and the second even deeper question is

we need to understand

how digitalization as a driver of

fundamental and deep change in our

societies

is creating a new context and we also

need to reflect about

next generation of sustainability

thinking itself so it is a paradigmatic

change needed

also on the side of sustainability

research

this slide is only show only showing

that digitalization is not a sector

digitalization is everywhere

if you look into the economy if you look

into our societies if you

reflect upon our democracy everywhere

digitalization artificial intelligence

is driving transformative processes of

change

i’m now coming to the heuristic i talked

about so a heuristic which helps us

to understand and to reflect upon the

drivers of

digitalization artificial intelligence

and how this should be brought and could

be brought together

with sustainability transformations

because as i said at the beginning

until now these two spheres are not well

interlinked

here is the heuristic we are talking

about three dynamics of the digital age

the first one is and i’m moving into it

in a second

how we can use digital technologies

to make sustainability happen the second

wave and the second dynamic girls goes

further it is about how

digitalization artificial intelligence

will change

entire societies and economies and how

we can learn

to think about a sustainable digital

society

and the third dynamic then is about the

future of humans

and you will see that for some this

debate sounds a bit utopian or dystopian

and i will tell you that all these kind

of things are already on its way in

science so we need to think about it

and we need to understand what’s going

on there to define rules of the game

towards a digital and sustainable

society

so let’s move into the first the first

dynamic here where we are asking how we

can bring together

sustainability challenges which we

define with the 2030 agenda the climate

agreement from paris

and digital dynamics and digital trends

the most important starting point i

would say is that there is no

automatism at all that digital

technologies

might help us to solve our

sustainability challenges

these technologies already started 20

years ago right

but still we do have a very resource

intensive and energy intensive and

climate destructive growth pattern

so we need to bring these trends

together to

solve the sustainability challenges we

are confronted with

our assessment is showing the following

two major observations the first one is

that

if we talk about a green economy we need

to think about decarbonization we need

to think think about

circularity of our economies we think

need to think about dematerialization

resource efficiency climate efficiency

and then monitoring and protecting

ecosystems

so if we look at the technologies now

available and emerging

our assessment is that the potential to

solve all these kind of

issues with these technologies is bigger

than without these technologies

so our assessment shows that the

opportunities are there but we need to

build the missing links

between digitalization artificial

intelligence and sustainability issues

but because still

it’s not interlinked there is a second

observation here regarding the first

dynamic when we try to think how to

bring digitalization and sustainability

challenges

together there are some risks i call

talk about

sleepy grounds no and i see four of

those and i will only mention those

what we can see is that very often

digitalization triggers new kinds of

inequalities

digital divides of many kinds we also

can see that

important parts of the economies and

industries are

from a power perspective very

concentrated this is not very good for

our democracies obviously

then there is a third dimension where we

all know that we need to find solutions

it is about privacy the right of

regarding our data

anything needs to move forward here if

not we lose privacy issues

and we lose the basic conditions for

making democracy work

and then the last element when it comes

to the risk is about governance

i can tell you because i’m working with

and for governments

that the knowledge about digitalization

artificial intelligence

blockchain machine learning in our

administrations

is very limited if we don’t get this

right we will not govern

sustainable these technologies towards

sustainability because

you cannot govern what you do not

understand no so this is

the first dynamic in which we already

are and these are the pros and cons the

opportunities and the challenges

then when i move to the second dynamic

this is about deep changes in our

societies

driven by these kind of technologies

artificial intelligence machine learning

these are not only instruments to solve

any kind of problems

these are drivers of fundamental change

and

we argue that the changes we will see

will be

evolutionary long-term and deep

shifts comparable with the industrial

revolution

comparable with the neolithic revolution

a big shift in human civilization is

what we have in front of us

and when we think about that we have

five characteristics which we found

which will make this digital

societies moving forward and i’m driving

you very rapidly

through these five main characteristics

because you will feel listening to me

how deep the changes are going to be and

my main point here is that we need to

bring these new kind

of societies which are emerging there we

need to bring this kind of thinking and

trends

together with sustainability thinking we

also need to develop further

our sustainability thinking so here are

the five characteristics

interconnectedness cognition

autonomous systems virtuality knowledge

explosion

and i’m going through that

interconnectedness is something which is

very easy

this is about internet of things this is

about quantum computing

this is about we can connect everything

around the globe with any other thing

about the

around the globe people planets

technical systems

anything and this will change our

economies it’s already changing our

economies but also our societies

the next important element the next

important

characteristic is then cognition this is

about machines and technical systems

which are going to change fundamentally

our life in the past we have been

building

machines which have hp have been helping

us physically

now we are building machines which are

themselves learning

which are having cognition which are

having intelligence

and developing its own intelligence

further we thought in the past and we

have been right for

299 000 years this is the existence of

human beings homozapians

that we are those who have cognition and

intelligence now we are building

machines capable of that

so here are some examples what machine

learning and

artificial intelligence can do already

today and we are at the beginning of an

exponential learning curve here so

ai is better in chess than we are ai is

also better in go

playing gold than we are voice

recognition and face recognition is

moving forward

we have programs translating any

language in any other language

all already today technical systems can

produce texts

you can see on the right hand side on

the bottom a book about this is a

scientific publication

by springer published and it is about

the stand of research

in battery research and this

book has been written by beta writer

beta writer as a technical system

it has not been developed by a human

being this book

and the synthesis of the work which we

brought together in this book

on battery research is being produced by

a technical system

so think about all of that you feel that

our our societies will change

fundamentally

the roles between technology and

technical systems and human beings

need to be rethought obviously at this

slide only one figure is interesting and

this figure is showing us that

ai researchers estimate that in 2040

2050 with a probability of 50 percent

the level of cognition and the level of

analytical skills

of technical systems of ai will be as

big as our own human capabilities in

this regard

and 90 of these colleagues are

estimating that

in 2075 with a probability of 90 percent

machines technical system will reach

this kind of cognition level

which human beings are representing this

will change everything which we know in

our societies production democracy

what is human-centered development about

in this kind of context

rethinking is needed then the third

element is about autonomous systems we

talk about autonomous

driving autonomous mobility but

autonomous technical systems

with autonomous decision-making systems

behind are also being used in industry

and courts in policy

policy work in human resource

processes in weapon systems and in the

management of social processes there are

some arguing that

democracy old fashioned you know our

autonomous decision making systems are

much more intelligent than

people sitting in parliaments so how far

are we going to go

and how far would we like to to drive

these kind of new technical

instruments in our social processes

optimizing

technical systems in firms in the

private sector

is different from using these kind of

instruments for optimizing our societies

so how to use those kind of technical

opportunities and how to embed those in

democratic structures

is a new question which we need to ask

ourselves and answer

the fourth characteristic is virtuality

wonderful

i mean we can visit any person

everywhere

we can drive and organize and control an

operation in a hospital

from berlin in any

country in the world so we virtual

mobility is becoming a reality

and we are moving from a

three-dimensional world into a

four-dimensional world

and this will change our thinking our

global networking

our production systems everything will

change based on virtuality

and then the last element which i will

not drive into all this will result in

an explosion of knowledge and how we use

this knowledge is still not decided no

because you can use

knowledge this is what we did during the

last 150 years you can use knowledge

for producing welfare and at the same

time destroy the planet this is the

situation in which we are in

so learning to use the knowledge and

these new technologies

for solving our problems this is what we

need to think about

but as the moderator said i’m not only

skeptical

and i’m not only mentioning the risks no

i’m also

thinking about a new humanism in the age

of

digital revolutions and here are my main

arguments because because i’m optimistic

that we can develop further our

humanistic system

no and the ideas are here the first one

is that

knowledge explosion using it right based

on education

for example no can help us to understand

much better

ourselves our societies the planet and

help to look for solutions

so knowledge explosion is one driver of

a new humanism

then there is a second very important

element which no one of us should

underestimate

transnational interconnectedness global

communication infrastructures i talked

about

virtuality i talked about meeting anyone

everywhere on earth

in virtual spaces for me this could be

using it right now the technical

infrastructure for building a

transnational global society

and for building what is urgently needed

a culture of global cooperation because

without cultures of global cooperation

we will not get sustainability

challenges right these might be the

technical instruments now to solve the

problem

there is a third element which i would

like to mention here briefly before

moving towards

the last two slides and this last

element is about maybe this

technologies no artificial intelligence

with all the capabilities of being

cognitively and analytically so strong

they might become stronger with a high

probability they will become stronger

or more capable than we as human beings

in this regard

no analytical intelligence and cognitive

capabilities

maybe these technologies help us to

understand

what the last frontier of humans and

humanity is about

no social capabilities social

intelligence

solidarity empathy love no this

is what technical systems cannot

develop this is our last frontier

and as you will remember the last era

of enlightenment was on cognition it was

on reasoning it was on our capabilities

to think

and now we might learn that our last

frontier

what makes us different comparing

ourselves with technical systems with

incredible incredible knowledge is that

we are strong at these kind of things

emotional intelligence solidarity love

how can we build this kind of knowledge

into our systems

how can we develop our development

thinking further human-centered

development

bringing these kind of reflections into

our

debates my last element here is about

the third domain dynamic which i only

would like to talk

about for the last two minutes so the

last

dynamic the third dynamic is about the

future of humans themselves no i talked

about

the first dynamic how we bring together

sustainability thinking with

technological opportunities and i see

many opportunities there

if we bring those two together together

the second one

deep changes in our society and we need

to rethink and develop further our

thinking on human-centered development

and sustainability because our societies

and economies

will be completely different the third

element is the future of humans

for those in the room who know

sustainability thinking

they know about the anthropocene debate

so the anthropocene debate is about

humans became capable of being the most

important driver of fundamental change

in the earth system itself now for

hundreds

thousands of years we have not been able

as human beings to change the

basic structures of the earth system now

we are no

and with digitalization artificial

intelligence

synthetic biology gene editing we are

now becoming

capable of transforming not only the

earth system

we are becoming capable of transforming

ourselves

no the terms which are in the in

discussion are about

artificial evolution we drive evolution

artificially driven evolution human

enhancement

human enhancement moving beyond health

and stabilizing health

asking the question how we could empower

or tune we tune we are tuning cars no

now we are

can tune our brains maybe so how far

would we like to go

and this is a normative question and

this sounds for many people

utopian or dystopian but i’m arguing as

we are already in this race

in many research projects we need to

take this on board when we think about

sustainable development

and people-centered development in the

future in a digital age because

we need to define how far we would like

to go you know

three major elements here and then i’m

done the first one is that

we need to recognize our own last

frontier this is what i already

mentioned

no so we need to develop our own

capabilities further

in the field of emotions our social

intelligence because

this is our strength being confronted

with machines which will be

as intelligent and diligent as we as we

are

the second element is here we need to

think about a.i

as a company of us supporting humans

we need to think about a human-centered

ai we need to

link our normative systems with the

technical systems

of artificial intelligence and machine

learning this is the second important

element

and then we need to decide how far we

would go when it comes to the

blurring boundaries between humans and

technical systems

there are discussions about hybrids

between humans and technical systems

so this is something which we need to

take on board concluding last sentence

you can feel and see here that our

setting and thinking of the 2030 agenda

the 17

development goals is not appropriate to

manage these kind of challenges

to even reflect upon these kind of

challenges we need a renewed

sustainability debate and a renewed

sustainability paradigm for the digital

age

thank you very much

you

是的,非常感谢你邀请我

来这里我将谈论

数字时代的可持续性转型

所以我来自

可持续性转型领域我

对气候变化

感兴趣我对地球的临界点感兴趣

系统

,今天我想

讨论数字化转型如何帮助

我们完成这些事情

,这就是为什么我们从德国

全球变化咨询委员会做我

是这个咨询机构的主席德国

政府我们做了一项

研究 共同的数字未来,我们

试图了解

数字化转型

实现可持续发展的潜力和风险,你可能不

相信,但在 2015 年,当我们

决定这些

可持续发展目标、可持续发展目标、2030 年议程、可持续发展目标时,

这不仅是甚至不是

关于数字化

人工智能

的讨论不存在的辩论今天

显然正在发生变化,您可能已经

听过 o 薰衣草线是

欧盟委员会主席,

在她谈到欧洲的未来时,

她谈到 20 世纪

的十年是数字化和可持续发展的十年,

但我们将如何将

它们结合在一起,这就是我想要的

反思一下,我在这里专注于两个

主要问题

,然后向您

展示我们如何

思考如何将

我们社会中的这两个大趋势结合在一起

我想问的第一个问题

是我们如何使用强大的

技术 为了使

我们的经济和社会朝着

可持续发展

的方向转变,第二个更深层次的问题是,

我们需要

了解数字化作为

我们社会根本性和深刻变化的驱动力

是如何创造新环境的,我们还

需要反思

下一代可持续发展

思维本身 因此,

在可持续性研究方面也需要进行范式变革

这张幻灯片只是展示而已

数字化不是一个行业

数字化无处不

在 一种启发式方法,可以帮助

我们理解和反思数字化人工智能的

驱动因素,

以及如何

将其

与可持续性转型结合起来,

因为正如我在开始时所说的那样,

直到现在这两个领域还没有很好地

相互关联。

启发式我们正在

谈论数字时代的三种动态

第一个是,我将

在第二个中进入它

我们如何使用数字技术

来实现可持续发展 第二个

浪潮和第二个动态 女孩

走得更远 这是关于如何

数字化 人工智能

将改变

整个社会和经济,以及

我们如何 可以

学会思考一个可持续的数字

社会

,第三个动力是

关于人类的未来

,你会发现,对于某些人来说,这场

辩论听起来有点乌托邦或反乌托邦

,我会告诉你,所有这些

事情已经在它的

科学的方式,所以我们需要考虑它

,我们需要了解那里正在发生的

事情,以定义游戏规则,

朝着数字化和可持续发展的

社会发展,

所以让我们进入第一个

动态,在这里我们询问如何将

我们聚集在一起

我们

在 2030 年议程中定义的可持续性挑战

来自巴黎的气候协议

以及数字动态和数字趋势

我要说的最重要的起点

,数字

技术

可以帮助我们解决我们的

可持续性挑战,

这些技术已经完全没有自动化 20

年前

就开始了 h 模式,

因此我们需要将这些趋势

结合在一起,以

解决我们面临的可持续性挑战

我们的评估显示了以下

两个主要观察结果 第一个是

如果我们谈论绿色经济,我们

需要考虑脱碳,我们

需要考虑 想想

我们经济的循环性,我们认为

需要考虑非物质化

资源效率气候效率

,然后监测和保护

生态系统,

所以如果我们看看现在

可用的和新兴的技术,

我们的评估是,

用这些技术解决所有这些问题的潜力

比没有这些技术更大,

所以我们的评估表明

机会是存在的,但我们需要

在数字化

人工智能和可持续性问题之间建立缺失的联系,

但因为

它仍然没有相互关联,所以

当我们尝试第一个动态时,这里有第二个观察结果 想想怎么

带数字 数字化和可持续性

挑战

一起存在一些风险 我称之为

谈论

昏昏欲睡的地方 不,我看到其中四个

,我只会提到

那些 我们可以看到的是,

数字化经常会引发新的

不平等

我们也

可以 看到

经济和工业的重要部分

从权力的角度来看非常

集中这显然对

我们的民主国家不是很好

然后还有第三个维度,我们

都知道我们需要找到解决方案

它是关于隐私权

关于我们的 数据

任何事情都需要在这里推进,

否则我们将失去隐私问题

,我们失去了使民主运作的基本条件

,然后涉及风险的最后一个因素

是关于治理

我可以告诉你,因为我正在与

政府合作并为政府工作

如果我们的政府对数字化

人工智能

区块链机器学习的知识

非常有限 e 做错了,

我们将无法管理

可持续的这些技术以实现

可持续发展,因为

您无法管理您不了解的事物,

因此这是

我们已经处于的第一个动态

,这些是利弊,然后是

机遇和

挑战 当我转向第二个动力时,

这是关于

由这些技术推动的我们社会的深刻变化

人工智能 机器学习

这些不仅是解决

任何问题的工具,

而且是根本性变化的驱动力

我们认为我们将要发生的变化 看

将是

进化的长期和深刻的

转变 与工业

革命

相媲美 与新石器时代革命相媲美

人类文明的重大转变是

我们面前的

,当我们想到

我们发现的五个特征

时 这个数字

社会正在向前发展,我正在

通过这五个主要特征快速推动你 ics,

因为你会觉得听我

说这些变化会有多深,

我的主要观点是,我们需要

这些正在出现的新型社会带到那里,我们

需要将这种思维和

趋势

与可持续发展思维结合起来 我们

还需要进一步发展

我们的可持续发展思维,所以这里

有五个特征

互联性认知

自治系统虚拟性知识

爆炸

,我正在经历

互联性

很容易

这是关于物联网这是

关于量子计算

这是关于 我们可以将全球所有事物

与全球其他事物联系

起来 人类 行星

技术系统

任何事物,这将改变我们的

经济 它已经改变了我们的

经济,也改变了我们的

社会 下一个重要元素 下一个

重要

特征是认知 这就是

关于 正在运行的机器和技术

系统 为了从根本上改变

我们过去的生活,我们一直在

制造

具有 hp 的机器,这些机器一直在为我们提供身体上的帮助

299 000 年

来我们一直

对的

这就是

人类的

存在 在这里处于

指数学习曲线的开始,所以

人工智能在国际象棋方面比我们更好 人工智能在下棋方面也比我们

更好

语音

识别和面部识别

正在向前发展

我们已经有了将任何

语言翻译成任何其他语言

的程序 今天的技术系统可以

产生文本,

你可以在底部的右侧看到

一本关于这方面的书是 Springer 出版的

科学出版物

,它是关于

电池研究研究的立场,这

本书是由 beta writer 写的

beta writer 作为一个技术系统

它不是由人类开发

的这本书

和 我们

在这本书中汇集的

关于电池研究的工作的综合是由一个技术系统产生的,

所以想想你认为

我们的社会将从

根本

上改变技术和

技术系统以及

人类之间的角色的所有事情 显然,在这张

幻灯片上只有一个数字很有趣,

这个数字向我们展示了

人工智能研究人员估计,在 2040 年到

2050 年,人工智能技术系统

的认知水平和分析技能水平有 50% 的

概率将与我们的 在这方面拥有自己的人类能力,其中

90 位同事

估计,

到 2075 年,机器的概率为 90%

技术系统将达到

人类所代表的这种认知水平 这

将改变我们社会中我们所知道的一切

生产民主

在这种情况下以人为中心的发展

是什么 需要重新思考 那么第三个

要素是关于我们的自治系统

谈论自动

驾驶 自动驾驶,但

自动技术

系统背后有自动决策系统

也被用于工业

和法院 政策

政策工作 人力资源

流程 武器系统和

社会流程管理

有人认为

民主已经过时了 你知道我们的

自主决策系统比

坐在议会中的人要聪明得多,所以

我们

要走多远,我们希望

在我们的社会流程中推动这些新技术工具

优化

公司的技术系统多远 私营

部门不同于usi 这些

工具可以优化我们的社会,

因此如何利用这些技术

机会以及如何将这些技术机会嵌入

民主结构

是一个新问题,我们需要问

自己并

回答第四个特征是虚拟性,

我的意思是我们可以访问任何

我们可以在世界上任何国家的柏林驾驶、组织和控制

医院的手术,

因此我们的虚拟

移动正在成为现实

,我们正在从

三维世界进入

四维世界

,这将会改变 我们的想法 我们的

全球网络

我们的生产系统 一切都

将基于虚拟性

而改变,然后我不会推动这一切的最后一个元素

将导致

知识爆炸,我们如何使用

这些知识仍未决定不,

因为你可以使用

知识 这就是我们在

过去 150 年中所做的,你可以利用知识

来创造福利,

同时摧毁 他这个星球这是

我们

正在学习使用知识和

这些新技术

来解决我们的问题的情况这是我们

需要考虑的,

但正如主持人所说,我不仅

持怀疑态度,

而且我不仅仅是 提到风险不,

我也在

考虑数字革命时代的新人文主义

,这是我的主要

论点,因为我很乐观

,我们可以进一步发展我们的

人文主义体系,

不,这里的想法是第一个

例如,基于教育正确使用它的知识爆炸不能帮助我们更好地了解

我们自己的社会和地球,并

帮助寻找解决方案,

因此知识爆炸是新人文主义的驱动因素之一,

还有第二个非常重要的

元素,没有人 我们中的一些人应该

低估

跨国互联性 全球

通信基础设施 我

谈到了

虚拟性 我谈到了在虚拟

世界上与地球上任何地方的任何人会面

对我来说

,现在可以使用它

建立

跨国全球社会

和建立迫切需要

的全球合作文化的技术基础设施,因为

没有全球合作文化,

我们将无法

正确应对可持续性挑战 这些可能是

技术工具 现在要解决这个

问题

,我想在这里简要提及第三个要素,

然后

转到最后两张幻灯片,最后一个

要素是关于也许这项

技术没有人工智能

具有

认知和分析

的所有能力 在这方面,

他们很可能会变

得比我们人类更强大或更有能力

没有分析智能和认知

能力

也许这些技术可以帮助我们

理解

人类和人类的最后边界是什么

没有社会能力 社会

智能

团结 同情 爱不,这

是技术系统无法

开发的,这是我们最后的前沿

,你会记得,启蒙的最后一个时代

是关于认知的,它是

关于推理的,它是关于我们思考能力的

,现在我们可能会知道,我们的最后一个

前沿

是什么造就了我们 将

我们自己与拥有

令人难以置信的知识的技术系统进行比较的不同之处在于,

我们在这些事情上很强大

情商 团结 热爱

我们如何将这种知识

融入我们的系统 我们

如何发展我们的发展

思维 进一步以人为本的

发展

带来这些 对

我们

辩论的反思我在这里的最后一个元素是

关于第三个领域动态,我只想

在最后两分钟谈论,所以

最后一个

动态第三个动态是

关于人类本身的未来不,我谈到

了第一个动态如何 我们将

可持续发展思维与

技术机会结合在一起,我看到了

很多机会

如果我们将这两者结合在一起,就会产生联系。

第二

,我们社会的深刻变化,我们需要

重新思考和进一步发展我们

对以人为本的发展

和可持续性的思考,因为我们的社会

和经济

将完全不同 第三个

要素是未来 人类

对于那些知道可持续性的房间里的人

认为

他们知道人类世辩论

所以人类世辩论是关于

人类成为

地球系统本身根本变化的最重要驱动力现在

数十

万年来我们一直无法

作为人类改变

地球系统的基本结构,现在

我们没有

,随着数字化人工智能

合成生物学基因编辑,我们现在

不仅能够改变

地球系统,

我们也能够改变

自己,

没有

讨论中的内容是关于

我们驱动 evo 的人工进化 解决方案

人工驱动的进化 人类

增强

人类增强 超越健康

和稳定健康

问这个问题我们如何能够增强

或调整我们调整我们正在调整汽车不

现在我们

可以调整我们的大脑

也许我们想走多远

这是一个 规范性问题,

这对许多人来说是

乌托邦式或反乌托邦式的,但我认为,由于

我们已经

在许多研究项目中参与了

这场竞赛,当我们在未来考虑

可持续发展

和以人为本的发展时,我们需要考虑到这

一点 数字时代,因为

我们需要定义我们

想走多远你知道

三个主要元素然后我就

完成了第一个是

我们需要认识到我们自己的最后一个

前沿这是我已经

提到的

不所以我们需要 在情感领域进一步发展我们自己的

能力

我们的社会

智慧,因为

这是我们

面对机器的力量,机器将

同样聪明和勤奋 因为我们

是第二个要素,所以我们需要

将人工智能

视为支持人类的公司

我们需要考虑以人为中心的

人工智能 我们需要

将我们的规范系统与

人工智能和机器的技术系统联系起来

了解这是第二个重要

元素

,然后我们需要决定

在人类与技术系统之间的模糊界限方面我们能走多远 有关于人类与

技术系统

之间的混合的讨论,

所以这是我们需要

采取的措施 董事会结束最后一句话,

您可以在这里感受到并看到,我们

对 2030 年

议程 17 项

发展目标的设定和思考不适合

应对此类挑战

,甚至不适合反思此类

挑战,我们需要重新开展

可持续性辩论和重新开展

可持续性 数字

时代的典范

非常感谢你