How to get serious about diversity and inclusion in the workplace Janet Stovall

Everybody has that one friend –

you know, the single-minded one,

the one who, no matter
what the question is,

always finds a way to make the answer
whatever it is she’s single-minded about.

I’m that friend.

(Laughter)

And the thing that I’m single-minded about

is racism.

If someone were to ask me, “So, Janet,
got any plans for the 4th of July?”

I’m subject to answer, “Yeah,
I’m going to binge-watch ‘Roots.'”

(Laughter)

Or if they said, “Janet,
I’ve got a joke for you:

Why’d the chicken cross the road?”

“Uh, was it a black chicken?

Probably gentrification.”

(Laughter)

(Applause)

But for me, single-mindedness
is not just caring about something.

It’s caring about something enough
to do something about it.

It’s not just thinking, it’s doing.

It’s not just praying,
it is moving your feet.

And the reason I’m single-minded
about racism is because I know

single-mindedness can destroy it.

I learned that many, many years ago.

Back in 1984, I was a junior
at Davidson College

in Davidson, North Carolina.

Now, Davidson is a little-bitty town,

Southern town, split by railroad tracks,

with white Davidson on one side,
black Davidson on the other side,

and, as black students lived
on the white side of the tracks,

we got used to being stopped
in downtown and asked for ID,

until the police memorized our faces.

But fortunately,
that didn’t take too long,

because out of 1,200 students,
only 52 of us were black.

There was one black professor

and one black assistant dean.

Things weren’t a lot better on campus.

Well, I wasn’t OK with this.

And so, I started writing things.

And then I started yelling things.

And after about three years of that,

I got tired.

So I decided to write one more thing;

I wrote something called “Project ‘87.”

Project ‘87 was really
just a challenge to Davidson:

in three years, by 1987,

enroll 100 black students,

hire 10 black professors,

create five Black Studies classes

and hire one black dean.

It didn’t seem particularly revolutionary,

but what was different about it was,

we also challenged Davidson
to say that if you don’t do this,

we will question
your commitment to diversity.

It was a real problem.

We put some real numbers to it.

We gave them some real consequences.

Well, the campus went absolutely nuts.

But fortunately, in the middle of this,

Davidson got a new president,

and that president was
single-minded about racism, too.

And so, he created a task force

to address the issues in Project ‘87.

And several months after that,

we produced a 77-page report.

That report was the foundation
for all the change that came after it.

Now, I wasn’t there to see that change,

because, actually, in 1985,

I graduated.

(Applause)

You are looking at the three
happiest people on the planet that day,

because I am leaving.

(Laughter)

However, the change did happen,

and today, there are 185 black students,

there are 16 black
or multiracial professors,

there are four black deans,

and there’s an entire degree-granting
Africana Studies Department.

(Applause)

Project ‘87 changed Davidson.

But it also changed me,
because what it taught me

was there’s a lot of power
in single-mindedness.

Well, today, I’m an executive speechwriter

for one of the biggest
companies in the world.

It’s a profession that is 92 percent white
and predominantly male,

which makes me a little bit of a unicorn.

But I’m a single-minded unicorn.

(Laughter)

So the thing about speech writing
is, it’s very personal.

So I spend a lot of time
in deep conversation

with the CEO and senior executives,

and a lot of times those conversations
turn to diversity and inclusion,

which, of course, I’m always
happy to talk about.

But after quite a few
of these conversations,

I’ve come to a conclusion:

I believe that business
is in a position to do something

that no other entity can do.

Business can dismantle racism.

Now, colleges can’t do it.

There aren’t but 5,000 of them
in the United States

and only 20 million students enrolled.

Church can’t do it, either –

only 35 percent of us go
on a regular basis,

and when we do,

eleven o’clock Sunday morning
is “the most segregated hour” in America.

But business?

There are a 162 million people
in the US workforce alone –

people of all races,

united in the spirit of wanting a paycheck
and having to show up to get it.

(Laughter)

Now, I’m aware that diversity
is bigger than race,

and racism is bigger than America.

But racial discrimination
is the most prominent form,

and Lord knows America is
the absolute best at it.

So what if, though, what if

we worked in diverse
and inclusive environments

that we had something
to do something with?

And since we spend
one-third of our lives at work,

what if we did that with people
who didn’t look like us?

I think the world would be
a totally different place outside of work.

That can happen if business
gets single-minded about racism.

But the question is:
How is that supposed to happen?

Well, I think there are three things
that business can borrow from Project ‘87:

real problems,

real numbers,

real consequences.

Like it or not,

diversity is not really a problem
for business – yet.

I mean, it’s a nice thing to have,
it’s the right thing to do,

but for decades, we’ve been trying
to make the case

that diversity fuels innovation
and customer insight.

I mean, at this point,
it’s kind of a no-brainer,

a little bit like hearing
a smoke alarm going off

and standing with your hand
on the hot door,

waiting for some data to tell you
that your house is on fire.

Because the data is already there.

Ethnically diverse companies perform
33 percent better than the norm.

Forbes’s best workplaces for diversity
enjoy 24 percent higher revenue growth.

And yet, here we are in 2018,

and there are only three black CEOs
in the Fortune 500.

And if your name is Molly or Connor,

you’ve got a 14 percent better chance
of getting a callback on your resume

than if your name is Shanice or DeShawn.

And all of this, despite
the fact that by 2045,

America is projected to be
a minority-majority country.

Here’s the thing:

the business case for diversity,
as it stands today,

doesn’t really speak to any problem.

And the only way business
is going to get single-minded

about racial diversity

is if it has a problem that is urgent
and relative to somebody

other than people of color.

I got one:

How about employees and customers?

Because no matter what business you’re in,

you’re going to need those, right?

Well, let’s talk about some real numbers.

If you have employees and customers,
wouldn’t it make sense

if they looked a little bit like
the people that work for you?

So if that’s the case, maybe your employee
base should be 13 percent Black

and 18 percent Hispanic,

because that’s what
the population looks like.

Maybe that’s what
your customer base looks like.

But let’s be clear:

diversity and inclusion
are not the same things.

Diversity is a numbers game.

Inclusion is about impact.

Companies can mandate diversity,

but they have to cultivate inclusion.

And if inclusion is what you’re after,

you’ve got to calculate
some slightly different numbers.

How about 30 percent?

Because that’s the point
that research shows

at which the voices of minorities
actually begin to be heard.

If you want a real problem,

you’re going to need
real numbers to fix it,

and if you’re not willing
to set real numbers,

then maybe you’re not real serious
about diversity and inclusion.

That brings me to my third point:

real consequences.

Think about this:

when salespeople forget what they’re doing
and don’t come up with their numbers,

what do we do?

We give them a little time,
maybe we give them some training.

But then if they don’t hit
those numbers eventually,

we fire them.

However, when you start talking
about diversity and inclusion,

we use terms like “accountability.”

And maybe we scold, and maybe
we hold back an incentive or two.

But you know what the best incentive is?

A job.

And you know what
the best disincentive is?

Losing it.

So if companies really
want accountability,

they should assume that that is a given.

Consequences are what happen when you
don’t do what you’re accountable for.

Imagine this:

imagine a place where people
of all colors and all races

are on and climbing every rung
of the corporate ladder;

where those people feel safe –
indeed, expected –

to bring their unassimilated,
authentic selves to work every day,

because the difference that they bring
is both recognized and respected.

And imagine a place where the lessons
we learn about diversity at work

actually transform the things we do,
think and say outside of work.

That is what happens
if we all work together

to fix what’s broken.

That is what happens if we stop
praying for change to happen

and actually start moving
our feet to making it.

That is the power of single-mindedness.

Thank you.

(Applause)

每个人都有一个朋友——

你知道,一个一心一意的

朋友,
无论问题是什么,她

总能找到一种方法来回答
她一心一意的问题。

我就是那个朋友。

(笑声)

而我一心一意的

就是种族主义。

如果有人问我,“那么,珍妮特,
7 月 4 日有什么计划吗?”

我可能会回答:“是的,
我要疯狂看《根》。”

(笑声)

或者如果他们说,“珍妮特,
我有一个笑话要给你看:

为什么鸡要穿越 路?”

“呃,它是一只黑鸡吗?

可能是高档化。”

(笑声)

(掌声)

但是对我来说,
一心一意不仅仅是在乎。

它关心的事情足以
对它做点什么。

这不仅仅是在想,而是在做。

这不只是祈祷,
它正在移动你的脚。

我对种族主义一心一意的原因
是因为我知道

一心一意可以摧毁它。

我在很多很多年前就知道了。

回到 1984 年,我

在北卡罗来纳州戴维森的戴维森学院读大三。

现在,戴维森是一个小镇,

南部小镇,被铁轨分开,

一边是白人戴维森,另一边是
黑人戴维森,

而且,由于黑人学生住
在铁轨的白色一侧,

我们已经习惯了
在市中心被拦下要身份证,

直到警察记住了我们的脸。

但幸运的是,
这并没有花太长时间,

因为在 1,200 名学生中,
只有 52 名是黑人。

有一位黑人教授

和一位黑人副院长。

校园里的情况也好不到哪里去。

好吧,我对此不太满意。

于是,我开始写东西。

然后我开始大喊大叫。

大约三年后,

我累了。

所以我决定再写一件事;

我写了一个叫做“Project ‘87”的东西。

‘87 计划实际上
对戴维森来说只是一个挑战:

在三年内,到 1987 年,

招收 100 名黑人学生,

聘请 10 名黑人教授,

创建五个黑人研究班

并聘请一名黑人院长。

这似乎不是特别具有革命性,

但不同的是,

我们还要求
戴维森说,如果你不这样做,

我们将质疑
你对多样性的承诺。

这是一个真正的问题。

我们给它加上了一些实数。

我们给了他们一些真正的后果。

嗯,校园绝对疯了。

但幸运的是,在这中间,

戴维森换了一位新总统,

而那位总统也
对种族主义一心一意。

因此,他创建了一个工作组

来解决 Project ‘87 中的问题。

几个月后,

我们制作了一份 77 页的报告。

该报告是其后发生
的所有变化的基础。

现在,我没有看到这种变化,

因为实际上,在 1985 年,

我毕业了。

(掌声)

你们看着
那天地球上最幸福的三个人,

因为我要走了。

(笑声)

然而,变化确实发生了

,今天有 185 名黑人学生,

有 16 名黑人
或多种族教授,

有 4 名黑人院长,

还有一个完整的授予学位的
非洲研究系。

(掌声)

‘87 计划改变了戴维森。

但它也改变了我,
因为它告诉我的

是,一心一意有很大的
力量。

好吧,今天,我是

世界上最大的公司之一的执行演讲撰稿人。

这是一个 92% 是白人
且主要是男性的职业,

这让我有点像独角兽。

但我是一心一意的独角兽。

(笑声)

所以关于演讲写作的事情
是,它非常个人化。

因此,我花了很多时间

与 CEO 和高级管理人员进行深入对话,

而且很多时候这些对话都
转向了多元化和包容

性,当然,我总是
很乐意谈论这些。

但经过
多次这样的对话,

我得出了一个结论:

我相信
企业有能力做

其他实体无法做到的事情。

商业可以消除种族主义。

现在,大学做不到。 美国

只有 5,000 人

,只有 2000 万学生入学。

教会也做不到——

只有 35% 的人
定期去,

而当我们这样做

时,周日早上 11 点
是美国“最隔离的时间”。

但是生意?

仅美国劳动力就有 1.62 亿人——

所有种族的人,

本着想要一份薪水并且必须到场领取薪水的精神团结
在一起。

(笑声)

现在,我意识到
多样性比种族更重要

,种族主义比美国更重要。

但种族歧视
是最突出的形式

,天知道美国
在这方面绝对是最擅长的。

那么,如果

我们在多样化
和包容性的环境中工作

,我们
可以做些什么呢?

既然我们
三分之一的生命都花在工作上,

那么如果我们对
长得不像我们的人这样做呢?

我认为工作之外的世界将是
一个完全不同的地方。

如果企业
对种族主义一心一意,就会发生这种情况。

但问题是:
这应该如何发生?

嗯,我
认为企业可以从 Project ‘87 中借鉴三样东西:

真实问题、

真实数字、

真实后果。

不管你喜不喜欢,

多样性对企业来说并不是一个真正的问题
——然而。

我的意思是,拥有它是一件好事,
这是正确的做法,

但几十年来,我们一直在努力

证明多样性能够促进创新
和客户洞察力。

我的意思是,在这一点上,

有点像
听到烟雾

警报器响起,然后把手
放在热门上,

等待一些数据告诉
你你的房子着火了。

因为数据已经存在了。

种族多元化的公司的表现
比正常水平高出 33%。

福布斯最佳多元化工作场所的
收入增长率提高了 24%。

然而,到了 2018 年

,财富 500 强中只有三位黑人 CEO

如果你的名字是 Molly 或 Connor,

那么你
在简历上收到回复的几率

比你的名字高 14% 是 Shanice 或 DeShawn。

所有这一切,
尽管到 2045 年,

美国预计将成为
一个少数族裔占多数的国家。

事情是这样的:

多样性的商业案例
,就目前而言,

并没有真正说明任何问题。

企业对种族多样性一心一意的唯一方法

是,如果它有一个紧迫的问题,并且

与有色人种以外的人有关。

我得到了一个:

员工和客户呢?

因为无论您从事什么业务,

您都将需要这些,对吗?

好吧,让我们谈谈一些实数。

如果你有员工和客户,

如果他们看起来有点像
为你工作的人,难道不是很有意义吗?

所以如果是这样的话,也许你的员工
基数应该是 13% 的黑人

和 18% 的西班牙裔,

因为这
就是人口的样子。

也许这就是
您的客户群的样子。

但让我们明确一点:

多样性和包容
性不是一回事。

多样性是一个数字游戏。

包容是关于影响的。

公司可以要求多元化,

但他们必须培养包容性。

如果包容是你所追求的,

你必须计算
一些略有不同的数字。

百分之三十怎么样?

因为那
是研究表明

少数族裔的声音
真正开始被听到的地方。

如果你想要一个真正的问题,

你将需要
实数来解决它

,如果你
不愿意设定实数,

那么也许你
对多样性和包容性并不认真。

这让我想到了第三点:

真正的后果。

想一想:

当销售人员忘记他们在做什么
并且没有得出他们的数字时,

我们该怎么办?

我们给他们一点时间,
也许我们给他们一些培训。

但是,如果他们最终没有达到
这些数字,

我们就会解雇他们。

但是,当您开始
谈论多样性和包容性时,

我们会使用“问责制”等术语。

也许我们会责骂,也许
我们会保留一两个奖励。

但是你知道最好的激励是什么吗?

一份工作。


知道最好的抑制因素是什么吗?

失去它。

因此,如果公司真的
想要问责制,

他们应该假设这是给定的。

后果是当你
不做你应该负责的事情时发生的事情。

想象一下:

想象一个
不同肤色和所有种族的人

都在攀登
企业阶梯的每一级的地方;

这些人感到安全——
实际上,人们期望——

每天带着他们未同化的、
真实的自我去工作,

因为他们带来的差异
得到了认可和尊重。

想象一个地方,
我们在工作中学到的关于多样性的课程

实际上改变了我们在工作之外所做、
思考和所说的事情。

如果我们齐心协力解决问题,就会发生这种情况

如果我们停止
为改变的发生

而祈祷并真正开始
行动起来去实现它,就会发生这种情况。

这就是一心一意的力量。

谢谢你。

(掌声)